Slashdot Mirror


Upgrading Hard Drive in Sony HDR-SR1 HDD Camcorder

clarkbox2 writes "Here is an interesting page detailing the cracking open of a $1400 camcorder just released by Sony. The pictures and text describe the opening of the outer shell, revealing the 1.8" Toshiba hard drive within. The HDR-SR1 ships with a tiny 30gb hard drive, allowing for four hours of recording in full HD. Great pictures showing the steps to recording bliss ... now where to get a battery capable of lasting for 12+ hours of full HD video?"

69 comments

  1. Tiny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    30 gram bits sounds heavy enough to me.

  2. Warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hold on a second... Doesn't this void the warranty?

    1. Re:Warranty by eln · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Who cares? If you screw it up, it's only $1400 down the drain.

  3. But they didn't upgrade it. by dopaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article is a little short on details... all they did was removed the cover to access the hard drive. Oh well, its ecks-mass.

    1. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      The article is a little short on details... all they did was removed the cover to access the hard drive. Oh well, its ecks-mass.

      Pity that Sony did not think to make the drive removable by the user. The SATA standard allows this for RAID arrays but its even more logical for laptops and cameras and as a general 'high capacity' storage medium.

      I guess that this is the sort of feature we will have to wait a while on, till the competition has heated up.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by rvw · · Score: 1

      The article is a little short on details...

      Not only that, but he could have edited the pictures a bit. The black is so.... black. Can't see a thing!

    3. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      iLink

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I've never seen an internal hard drive with a Firewire connector; hence the suggestion for SATA (which, sooner or later, should propagate to 2.5" drives).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you talking about, that SATA should sooner or later propagate to 2.5 inch drives? I have a 2.5 SATA drive in my hands right now (from a MacBook).

    6. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by Nexx · · Score: 1

      I think you need to adjust your settings a bit -- my IBM Thinkpad's LCd resolves the different shades and gies me sufficient detail.

    7. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by mwbauers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about most people.........

      But I am waiting for the makers to put out camcorders that have REMOVABLE hard-drives.

      You just have to look just a bit further out and you'll see the market eventually giving us those tiny hard drives in a universal REMOVABLE SATA mount, and Camcorders built to use them.

      I really like the form-factor of the Samsung [sp?] all electronic camcorder that is about half the size of a pack of cigarettes, has a tethered second video head.......... BUT ONLY USES DIGITAL CARDS........... Which give a person 12 minutes of recording at highest settings......... Just doesn't cut it when I am used to 2-hour 8 mm. tapes.

      If they would just advance the design to use any sort of removable hard drive, I would buy one in a minute !!!

      On the Samsung, it would be adding just a fraction of an inch to the very thin cross-section of the body.

      I sure do like the potential of the new HDTV Sonys.

      But I'm sure waiting for the merging of the tiny camcorders with removable drives before I replace my present tape based non-HDTV camcorder .

      Come on Samsung, Sony, and the rest of you makers; put those separate features together as a new standard design for camcorders and you'll have a major flood of new customers.

    8. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      1.8" hard drives are so expensive that I don't think there is a point in making them like field-swappable modules, I think they'd charge $400 for an 80GB module and be about the size of an iPod for best durability. In comparison, $2 DV tapes make a nice archive format in themselves. I know tapes are going away but they still hold their own in my opinion, I haven't had a problem with them.

    9. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      There aren't any 1.8" SATA drives that I've heard. This camera uses the 1.8" size.

    10. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do hard drive camcorders cost so much more (or ANY more) than old fashioned camcorders? Old fashioned tape camcorders had to have a large number of accurately machined parts inside to open the tape protection system flaps, unspool the tape and put it round the head, the head cost a lot of money, all the parts had to be very accurately machined and had to keep working otherwise they'd eat your tape. No way does that cost more than a $2 1.8" hard drive interface and a $30 drive...

      So why are we paying through the nose for what should be CHEAPER?

    11. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      iLink would work fine for the external Firewire boxes with DV and HDV camcorders because they use that connector. Firestore and other makers have external recording boxes. Unfortunately, the SR1 does not have iLink/Firewire, all transfers are over USB2 unless you go extreme and capture video using an HDMI card.

    12. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >So why are we paying through the nose for what should be CHEAPER?

      It's lighter, it's new, shiny, and sexy, and CEOs of Asian manufacturers need big money.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    13. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What the hell is wrong with you? Big corporations like Sony need a higher profit margin than they had in the past because that is what keeps shareholders happy and keeps their stock price rising. If they had the same profit margin they had back in the 80s with that accurately machined crap, the shareholders would have dumped their stock. And as a consumer, it's your duty to purchase these overpriced gadgets to keep these glorious corporations strong! If you buy from some lower-priced (lower profit margin) competitor instead, think about all the shareholders you'll be hurting! Don't be selfish; buy Sony.

    14. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by dthree · · Score: 1

      Tapes aren't going away yet, there are several HD formats in the pro video world that are tape-based, although they aren't mini-enough for consumer user. That's ok because HDV is pretty good for consumer video. Right now the only removable memory system in pro video uses solid state cards http://panasonic.com/business/provideo/p2/index.as p and they are kinda 'spensive for the size. Panny doesn't have a tape format that can take DVCPRO HD, just these P2 cards.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
    15. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Ah, so it was sooner rather than later! : )

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    16. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I thought DVCPRO HD can be (and is) put on a miniDV tape by someone, but maybe Panny doesn't offer that feature. You only get 15 minutes out of the tape with that format, but that's definitely more you get out of P2. What P2 does though is allow much faster retrieval.

      I do agree that miniDV has some legs in it, it's a mature format that is fairly well established where there is a veritable ecosystem of products and experience around it. HDV extends that. I didn't suggest that it's going away next year, but maybe five to ten years is a reasonable time frame. I do expect a competitive memory or drive system before then though. Four gigs for a hundred dollars is commercially possible right now, just by looking at the USB stick market.

    17. Re:But they didn't upgrade it. by dthree · · Score: 1

      Right, i forgot about varicam. It has 4x the datarate of DV/DVCPRO so you can only fit 1/4 the time on a DVCPRO tape. I used a P2 camera on a shoot a few months ago and it would only put HD on the P2 cards and only DV on the built-in tape drive.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
  4. 30GB is tiny!?! by windowpain · · Score: 0

    I assume the post is referring to capacity and not physical size. These young punks today. Why in my day we had 10MB drives and we were happy with them! And we had to walk to and from school in the driving snow uphill BOTH WAYS!

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
    1. Re:30GB is tiny!?! by bcat24 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You had hard drives?! In *my* day, we stored our data in huge magnetic drums. And we liked it!

    2. Re:30GB is tiny!?! by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
      I assume the post is referring to capacity and not physical size. These young punks today.Seriously, 30gb -> 4 hours in HD! How can anyone complain (although I like the mod)
      Why in my day we had 10MB drives and we were happy with them! And we had to walk to and from school in the driving snow uphill BOTH WAYS!
      I supose you didn't have Eucledian (sp?) geometry back then.
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    3. Re:30GB is tiny!?! by rvw · · Score: 1

      You had hard drives?! In *my* day, we stored our data in huge magnetic drums. And we liked it!

      You had huge magnetic drums? And you like them?! In my days we had paper, and we liked it so much, we didn't even write on it.

    4. Re:30GB is tiny!?! by omeomi · · Score: 1

      You had magnetic drums?!? In my day, we stored our data on an onion, because that was the style at the time...

    5. Re:30GB is tiny!?! by windowpain · · Score: 1

      Euclidean geometry is for wimps. I had to drink my milk out of a Klein bottle!

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
    6. Re:30GB is tiny!?! by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I'm from the same "day", and I remember being painfully aware that digital storage had not reached the levels where audio and video would be possible. What I didn't expect, was that the "plateau of human proportions" would be reached so quickly or exceeded so dramatically (exceeded, that is, in the sense that audio recording quality is so far beyond the threshold of human perception that we don't actually *need* any more advances -- this is yet to come for video.)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:30GB is tiny!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Driving snow on the way to school? You didn't grow up in Soviet Russia by any chance did you? ;)

  5. But they didn't upgrade the geek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The article is a little short on details... all they did was removed the cover to access the hard drive. Oh well, its ecks-mass."

    Welcome to the new geekdom, were taking off the cover gains you membership.

    1. Re:But they didn't upgrade the geek. by jbrax · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia the (national security) cameras take off your cover!

  6. delicate connector be careful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those are easy kinda like a atari cartrage try ribbon cable with the 44 pin or what the hell ever mini ide interface thing
    in other shock mounted apps

  7. Just like laptops by zlogic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like the camera was designed to allow this kind of "hack".
    What next, are we going to get an article about adding RAM to an HP laptop?

    1. Re:Just like laptops by Cylix · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shhh, if HP knew we were modifying their laptops they would probably sue the hell out of all of us hax0rs.

      Shit, just talking like that makes my underground supplier edgy!

      All it takes is one person to ruin the fun for everyone I'm afraid.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Just like laptops by zlogic · · Score: 1

      HP is probably the only laptop manufacturer that publishes COMPLETE disassembly/repair manuals. My nx6310 had a manual with instructions on removing and replacing the keyboard, heatsink, CPU, display and other parts. You may download the manual freely here: http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/C oreRedirect.jsp?redirectReason=DocIndexPDF&prodSer iesId=1839143&targetPage=http%3A%2F%2Fh20000.www2. hp.com%2Fbc%2Fdocs%2Fsupport%2FSupportManual%2Fc00 805752%2Fc00805752.pdf

    3. Re:Just like laptops by BRTB · · Score: 1

      HP isn't the only one that publishes service information for their machines. For example, here's the service manual I've been using recently for Dell Latitude D620s at work:
      http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/latd 620/en/SM/index.htm Of course, similar manuals for most of their other models are on the website as well.

      IBM has their manuals up for download too. Here's one I found real quick for a new(ish) IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad:
      http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/documen t.do?sitestyle=lenovo&lndocid=MIGR-62866

      Now Apple, on the other hand, is usually pretty tight-lipped about how to dismantle their machines, especially the notebooks and the Mini. Not that you still can't find the service manual PDF if you know where to look...

  8. A better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better solution would be to not buy a Sony product until they stop mistreating their customers ...

  9. system design by oohshiny · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe the 30G drive is just in there to keep the price down. But maybe it's part of the overall system design--a good compromise between battery life, size, weight, robustness, etc. So, I wouldn't blindly assume that putting an 80G drive into the device will make a better camcorder.

    Note that the 80G drives that the article mentions are found in iPods are actually in iPods that are substantially thicker than the iPods using 30G drives.

    1. Re:system design by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      A larger drive would just extend the record time, assuming that it can be done. The problem is that page is at best just exposing the drive, no attempt was made to upgrade the drive, so there's no way to know that it would be accepted without hacking the firmware.

      That camcorder is a little ahead of the curve, editing the file format that it records is a pain, you'll need to transcode it.

    2. Re:system design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A larger drive would just extend the record time, assuming that it can be done.

      Says who? You? If the 80G drives are just a drop-in replacement for the 30G drives, then why are the 80G iPods twice as big as the 30G iPods?

      Furthermore, even if it were just a drop-in replacement, it is far from clear that the extra recording time is actually useful for normal usage and warrants the expense. That's what I meant by "system design".

  10. where to get a battery capable of lasting for 12h? by mikelieman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "now where to get a battery capable of lasting for 12+ hours of full HD video?""

    See that jack labeled "DC-in"?

    Google "Battery Belt" and knock yourself out.

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  11. Mod without a mod by MojoRilla · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, this is a mod without an actual mod. All they do is show pictures of the hard drive, and pine for an extra 1.8" hard drive. On one hand, if you spend ~1000 on a camcorder, what's an extra $240 to more than double the recording time? On the other, do you really want to take a chance that you might destroy your ~1000 investment?

    Hard drive camcorders might be the wave of the future. However, removable flash based memory is also interesting, and avoids mechanical parts all together. 8 gig SD cards are here, though still expensive. The question is, will the convenience of having no moving parts and removable media outweigh the inconvenience of smaller media? Ultimately, flash (or some successor) will probably win. But in the short term, hard drives look good.

    The Sony HDR SR1 has a serious problem, in that it records using AVCHD, which is uneditable by third party products at this time. Things should be better come spring (when Sony Vegas will support AVCHD).

    1. Re:Mod without a mod by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The Sony HDR SR1 has a serious problem, in that it records using AVCHD [wikipedia.org], which is uneditable by third party products at this time. Things should be better come spring (when Sony Vegas will support AVCHD).

      I don't think "Third party" means what you think it means.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  12. 12+ hours by Cylix · · Score: 1

    12+ hour with a camera that size shouldn't be that difficult...

    Unfortunately, the power supply upgrade will have to be belt mounted.

    I don't know why they made it sound so difficult as we can do 5 hour sprints on a single battery with cameras consuming much much more power.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  13. not true hd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This camera uses 4:2:2 chroma subsampling, and is therefor not 'true' HD. Although it is a great camera for the price they indicated, as there aren't any 4:4:4 cameras for under $10k

    1. Re:not true hd by dthree · · Score: 1

      Its a $1000 consumer-based camera with double the color resolution per pixel compared to DV, so I don't think the thing has good enough optics for anyone to notice the difference between 4:2:2 and 4:4:4. Also, nobody said that HD requires 4:4:4 although I'm sure sony would like everyone to think so since they are the only one with a full aquisition solution (HDCAM SR)

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
  14. AVCHD codec support in Linux by linuxguy · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Does it exist for playback and/or editing?

  15. Re:where to get a battery capable of lasting for 1 by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

    Amen, not to mention that I've been recording 12+ hour streches for years...all it took was getting a laptop with a firewire in an WinDV. It's never been film capacity that's the problem. Battery is a little harder but....I'm never just holding a camera for 12 hours in my hand. Which means I'll be using a tripod. Which means I'll have time to setup. Which means I can run and tape down an extension cord from the outlets that 99% of all places have somewhere to run the buffer or power washer.

    I would buy this thing in a hearbeat except for Sony's current hardon for 1080i, which is crap. I don't want it on a PS3 and I don't want it on a camcorder. I'm done with interlacing. My current camcorders are all progressive scan (even though a miserable 480p) but I've never been happier or had better looking video. If someone can make a 720p version of this then I'll take a look.

    - JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  16. Destroying a HD Camcorder... HV10 external mic mod by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    I'm going to add an external mic jack to my Canon HV10. It's the only feature missing from an otherwise sensational HD camcorder -- the ability to use a dynamic shotgun mic or condensor mics and a phantom power mixer to pull in professional-quality audio which matches the brilliant HD picture. I've not yet cracked it open, but it should be as simple as adding a stereo 1/8" audio jack wired in parallel with the factory mic, a DPDT switch, a sharp drill and nerves/balls of steel (needed to crack open a $1000 toy and start drilling/soldering and undoubtedly voiding the 1-year warranty).

  17. Re:where to get a battery capable of lasting for 1 by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    JVC makes 720p HDV camcorders. They are not hard drive based, but if you are recording straight to a notebook computer, then you wouldn't need to use tapes.

  18. I'm still on DV tapes -- for good reason by Roblimo · · Score: 2, Informative

    That reason is the motion artifacts and image noise that seem to go along with the AVCHD format. And that's just *one* of the reasons why, instead of buying an HDR-SR1, I paid an extra ~$1200 for a Sony HVR-A1U that does not only standard DV and HDV but also DVCAM format.

    I lust after the time savings of being able to bang a camera hard drive's contents into a computer at faster-than-playback speeds, but I also like the fact that DV tapes give me an original archive of what I've shot, and for at least the next few years it's likely that DV and HDV (and DVCAM and DVPRO) are going to be the dominant formats for prosumer, event, and a growing amount of ENG video.

    OTOH, if you don't know what DVCAM, DVPRO and ENG mean, you'll probably be happy with the SR1. I would strongly recommend it over the similarly-priced DV-tape HC3, which has neither mic nor headset jacks. (Hint: *always* use an external mic to keep from picking up the camcorder's own mechanism noise -- and noise from your finger/hand movements if you're hand-holding the thing. Or your breating if you're 1' away from the back of the cam and trying to get clean sound from a person 10' away in front of it.)

    Four hours of recording time is a LOT if you're going to be doing around-the-home and local shooting where you can unload the cam into a computer every day (and you have major HD space on the computer). The biggest on-camera battery you can buy for that cam will go about five hours, which is barely enough to get 4 hours of actual shooting.

    I have never shot more than four hours in a single day, myself. In general, I think you will find that for most home, semi-pro, training video, and indie film use, you will rarely (if ever) shoot much more than two hours per day, so a 4 hour HD on the cam ought to be plenty for most people.

    - Robin

    1. Re:I'm still on DV tapes -- for good reason by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I personally haven't had a problem with the internal mic recording the camera's noise, the problem with the internal mic is that they simply don't sound very good and and the internal mics are nearly omnidirectional. Often, the mic doesn't even fully point in the direction of the shot, so if it's not omnidirectional, you are recording better audio away from the shot.

    2. Re:I'm still on DV tapes -- for good reason by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well, the Sony HVR-A1U is in a very different market. Unless you'd like some wear it like some press ID, the rest of us would like camcorders that look at least somewhat like consumers when carried around. Ups and downs for the three contenders

      Sony HDR-SR1:
      + Audio jacks
      - AVCHD format has worse quality
      - AVCHD isn't easily edited

      Sony HDR-HC3:
      + Picture quality
      - Only "accessory shoe" mic input

      Canon HV10:
      + Smallest
      + Great quality in good light
      - Terrible quality in poor light

      Personally, I'm hoping for an upgrade to HDR-HC3 to include the missing connectors - it's come across as the best camera picture-wise, but lacks a few important options. And when can we record in progressive mode, please?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:I'm still on DV tapes -- for good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The A1 can be a monster with accessories but once I remove the XLR module, lens hood, wireless receiver, light, microphone, WA lens, etc... it's actually a fairly smallish consumer looking camera that can easily pass without drawing too much attention.

      You can already trick it into recording progressive by setting the shutter speed to 1/30th -- since the camera cannot capture 60 fields at 1/30th each (not enough time in a second!) it records 30 whole frames and splits the fields when saving to HDV. A regular deinterlace will put them back together to form whole frames. Obviously you wouldn't want to record things with a lot of motion at 1/30th but it's a decent workaround for everything else.

    4. Re:I'm still on DV tapes -- for good reason by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Something that seems to be common for all of the HD based camcorders is a much lower apparent bitrate for their digital encoding, which is why I choose DV myself. (Along with the fact that it's less expensive, more common, and I can simply replace tapes if I'm slow to archive to the computer system.)

      It's my guess that a lower bitrate allows for more power conservation and a lower price for encoding hardware, but that's entirely supposition on my part.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  19. Re:where to get a battery capable of lasting for 1 by c_g_hills · · Score: 1

    If you are going to plug it into the mains, you might as well just add a firewire cable and record straight onto a computer or dvr. I think 30GB is plenty for using it on the go.

  20. Re:Destroying a HD Camcorder... HV10 external mic by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I'm slightly ahead of you on that. While I haven't actually tried to do that mod yet, I have opened the camcorder and it does appear to be relatively easy task for a mod, but I have not actually done it yet. It is not that hard to take apart or reassemble, you just have to keep track of what screw goes where though it's easy to figure out if you put the wrong screw in the wrong place.

    I was thinking of just nixing or disconnecting the internal mic in favor of a standard miniplug because the internal mic is pretty close to worthless. I hope to make a kit or service.

    I happen to make and sell camcorder adapters of various kinds, so that's one reason I've been in there. My business's site is linked from my personal site that you can click above my post text.

  21. Re:Destroying a HD Camcorder... HV10 external mic by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have a timecode system (SMTPE would do fine) on the camera, and a compatable system on an external sound recorder, something that is completely solid-state, and would allow the use of real mics and preamps. If I *wanted* to use a small condensor mic and hang the recorder on the camera, I still could, but I would certainly appreciate the ability to do proper sound recording and be assured that the sound could be sync'd to the video. But then, I am far more interested in audio than video, and, maybe I'm imagining a more professionally oriented camera than what the article is actually about.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  22. Re:Destroying a HD Camcorder... HV10 external mic by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    But so long as you're giving a signal to the camcorder to sample (either @ 16 bit or 24 bit resolution) and don't need more than two tracks, synch is not an issue. It compresses the video in realtime along with the audio track.

    However, if you're needing more than two tracks (for example, recording a musical act or a stage play, etc.) then I could see how you'd need an external multitrack recorder and this camera isn't designed for that. However, you could do it the old-fashioned-way and simply use a snapboard to mark the beginning of the scene.

  23. Tape. Know it. Love it. by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    I have one question: Why have a hard drive in a small, easily-knocked-about video camera? What's better about a delicate, shock-sensitive moving part in an electronic good that's going to be abused? There's a lot to be said for more storage, but how about buying more tapes?

    Call me a Luddite, but I just bought one of these for Christmas, and I went with the tape version. Talk all the smack you want about tape, but it's durable, shock-resistant, and stands the test of time.

    Besides... what's with this site? Did I miss it, or did they not even attempt the mod they're talking about?

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  24. Re:Destroying a HD Camcorder... HV10 external mic by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if you can put 2-channel audio into the camera in the digital domain, that is very, very cool stuff for a consumer device. Just take a 2-channel mix off the board (SP/DIF? It's a Sony, so I hope it has that), and use it as a reference track or whatever, and do multitrack audio however you want.

    I do think very much in terms of multitrack recording, since any video I would be doing, would be of musical acts where the audio is much more than merely incidental stuff. Consumer audio gear already gives us great multitrack digital audio.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  25. 12+ hours? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who can fuck for that long, I mean really!

  26. Proprietary compression? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better question is.. How difficult is it to import and edit the video?

    I don't know about this model but previous non-DV tape camcorders (like hard or flash drive or DVD based) tend to require proprietary applications to import and edit the footage. They also usually use a wonky compression technique (like a slightly "off" version of mpeg2). Sony is of course a major offender but not alone. That means no Avid, no Premiere, no iMovie or Final Cut (in fact no Apple computers at all.) This may not matter to you but not being able to use the standards (which are usually vastly superior to the software that come with the camera) is pretty limiting. It may also mean the footage is useless down the road if you no longer own the camera or have access to the software.

    Me, I'm sticking with miniDV. There will still be a way to import raw DV in ten years.

  27. another viral perchance? by chucken · · Score: 1

    First thing I thought when I saw this page was: another viral from Sony themselves...

  28. battery by wkitchen · · Score: 1
    ... now where to get a battery capable of lasting for 12+ hours of full HD video?
    AutoZone.
  29. Fucking retards by dangitman · · Score: 1

    You know, you don't have to record the 12 hours of footage in a single take. You could even, you know, recharge the batteries and shoot the next scene later, after you have spent the time setting up the location/set/lighting. Gosh, you could even buy more than one battery pack!

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Fucking retards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sometimes the Viagra takes on a mind of it's own....

      and we must be ready...

  30. Re:Tape. Know it. Love it. by dthree · · Score: 1

    Not to mention tape is cheaper than hard drives and you don't have to erase it when you run out of space, just stick another tape in. After capture, put your tapes on the shelf and you already have a backup of your source.

    --
    "I forgot my mantra."