Slashdot Mirror


Low-tech Inventions That Help Change Lives

angelaelle writes "The current issue of Popular Mechanics is featuring their Breakthrough Awards program for inventors. Some of the winning inventions help improve the living conditions for people in third world countries using low-tech materials and assembly methods. Technologies like this cookstove for people in Darfur, and in the case of this Windbelt developed by Shawn Frayne, could be used to provide cheap, clean energy alternatives. The website features fascinating, inspiring videos talking about the inventor's 'eureka moment', focusing on the inventor as well as the technology."

174 comments

  1. KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Like most things that have changed life for the better, the bulk have been from a simple premise, such as removal of the handle from the Broad Street pump.


    Provide countries with the simple necessities, and life will get easier and more productive.


    Cheers



    "You've got a chart filling a whole wall with interlocking pathways and reactions to shock and the researcher says "If I can just control this one molecule/enzyme/compound I'll stop the whole negative physiologic cascade of post haemorrhagic shock." Yeah, right."

  2. Drill-style water pump by phorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of my favorites was the water-pump that was essentially a spiral "drill" type shape enclosed in a tube. As you rotate the drill, it water in the spirals would be moved upwards through the pipe and - eventually - out the spout at the top.

    My understanding was that it's a lot better than many of the bucket+rope configurations used with wells.

    1. Re:Drill-style water pump by dan4surf · · Score: 0

      Yes the water-pump is great. :) By dan from The gadgets site http://www.gadgets-club.com/

    2. Re:Drill-style water pump by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 4, Informative

      It sounds like you're talking about Archimedes' screw.

      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    3. Re:Drill-style water pump by Telvin_3d · · Score: 4, Informative

      I do believe that this invention is known as an Archimede's Screw.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes_screw
      The fact that it is named after a dead Greek should tell you how well known the principles of it are.

    4. Re:Drill-style water pump by tmasssey · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called an Archimedes' Screw. It has advantages (especially in high-torque applications), but it is not very useful for moving water a long distance. Out of a ditch (a few meters), yes. Out of a *well* (tens of meters), no.

    5. Re:Drill-style water pump by jfengel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is that different from the Archimedes Screw, which has been used for well over 2,000 years? It's pretty clever but it's not exactly new.

    6. Re:Drill-style water pump by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      Unless you bring it up to temporary reservoirs, then move it with another screw to the next level, and so on.

    7. Re:Drill-style water pump by maggard · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, no.

      Archimede's Screw is not a replacement for a rope & bucket. Or at least, not for the sort of deep well seen in many parts of the world where surface water is unavailable or contaminated.

      Archimede's Screw requires substantially more run then rise; making it suitable for moving water up and over from a river to a settling pond or canal. Wikipedia has a good explanation of the mathematics; for the casual reader just figure about a 30 degree angle or less.

      On the other hand a rope & bucket is all rise and very little run; it just brings water up, on the very close order of 90 degrees.

      So they're substantially different sort of devices, and not interchangeable at all. Nor is either particularly new, Archimede's Screw dates back 2,500+ years, the rope and bucket considerably further.

      All of that said, I have to note that not knowing about Archimede's Screw is a pretty spectacular gap in a decent education.

      The six classes of simple machines - wedge, ramp, screw, lever, wheel & axle, and pulley, are fundamental to how the machanical world works. I'd have hoped this is covered early on in anyone's education, particularly anyone with any sort of interest in 'how the world works'.

      If your educational system neglected this material perhaps a note to them detailing this gap, and resulting gaffe, might inspire the current generation of educators to review the curricula and see if that can't fit it in somewhere.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    8. Re:Drill-style water pump by Calinous · · Score: 1

      I've found about the Archimedes' screw reading some thing or another on the Internet, a couple of years ago. Had no idea of its existence before

    9. Re:Drill-style water pump by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No. We're talking about the one invented by Archimedes. I don't even know who this Archimede character that you're talking about is.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Drill-style water pump by maggard · · Score: 1

      Thank you, you're right, I don't know what I was thinking: Archimedes.

      I can only claim lack of sleep (and hope readers also forgive the spelling errors.)

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  3. video warnings please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The links mentioned have heavy video on them. Thanks.

  4. my favorite.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:my favorite.. by the_tsi · · Score: 1

      Agreed, that's the one I was thinking of when I read the summary.

      Best. name. ever.

    2. Re:my favorite.. by quick_dry_3 · · Score: 1

      that sounds very much like a coolgardie safe

      (and I remember reading ina kids book when I was little about keeping things cool using a wet terracotta pot - is the pot in a pot really that big a leap?)

    3. Re:my favorite.. by PresidentEnder · · Score: 1

      Nope, but I didn't think of it, and I'd guess you didn't, either. I'm clever, and I'll assume that you are, too; it's invention-worthy.

      --
      I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    4. Re:my favorite.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolgardie_safe

      Over 100 years older, and it would seem to more effective (wind + water cooling) as opposed to just water evaporation.

      Don't these award people have the internet?

    5. Re:my favorite.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      We improvised something like this on scouts camp.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:my favorite.. by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      I have to say that I'm not a big fan of a refrigeration device to be used in the dessert that uses water instead of electricity.

    7. Re:my favorite.. by hey! · · Score: 1

      People can live without electricity. They can't live without water.

      It follows that even amongst desert dwellers, nobody lives where a substantial supply of water is unavailable.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:my favorite.. by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      I have to say that I'm not a big fan of a refrigeration device to be used in the dessert that uses water instead of electricity.

      True. It seems that in that living situation, sugar extraction might yield the most abundant resource, and consuming the available water might leave the dessert with an unsavory hard texture.

  5. Hexayurts by StCredZero · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of these sorts of technologies were aggregated (PDF) by the Hexayurt folks. The hexayurt is itself one of these technologies. A roomy shelter costing just over $200, takes just a few hours to build, and has the R-value of a typical house.

    http://hexayurt.com/

    1. Re:Hexayurts by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "A roomy shelter costing just over $200, takes just a few hours to build, and has the R-value of a typical house."

      Apparently longer than they spent on their website. Seriously, why does it read as a random gob of sentences about the Hexayurt, yet not answer my basic questions?

    2. Re:Hexayurts by replicant108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fascinating videos. The last one especially is excellent.

      Ghandi+Bucky Fuller+FOSS = interesting stuff!

      This is a page with more info on the Hexayurt:

      http://www.appropedia.org/Hexayurt_Project

    3. Re:Hexayurts by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

      Great - paint it camoflage - add sand bags around the sides (for incomming rounds) ----- the perfect post apocolypse dwelling

      --
      Its not the years, its the mileage .....
    4. Re:Hexayurts by vkg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry you were having trouble with the web site. I'm Vinay, the guy who designed the hexayurt. What did you want to know that you couldn't find there?

    5. Re:Hexayurts by replicant108 · · Score: 1

      Hi Vinay,

      You should take the summary information from this page - http://www.appropedia.org/Hexayurt_Project - and put it the front page of your site. I'd also like to see a summary of how your project borrows from Ghandi, Bucky Fuller and FOSS.

      FWIW, I think what you are doing is really interesting - and I disagree that you suck at video!

      --
      R108

    6. Re:Hexayurts by vkg · · Score: 1

      Ah! Yes, I'm so close to it I forget that people are seeing it for the first time!

      I'm going to be overhauling and reorganizing the web sites soon, make things like http://disastr.org/ and http://cheapid.guptaoption.com/ more visible.

      Will bear this in mind then!

    7. Re:Hexayurts by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2
      I have a few hexayurt questions:
      • How do you tie the hexayurts down so they don't blow away in the first breeze? I don't see any hard points to tie a rope to.
      • Your site has patterns for the 6 footer, and the stretch 6. Any patterns for the bigger ones?
      • What tape are you using? I saw passing references, but I'm not sure of the details.
      • Have you given any thought to ways to scale this up slightly and make it more permanent? Maybe using structural insulated panels? I realize that's totally off-topic for your immediate purpose, but it might help win acceptance if it were seen as more mainstream.

      And a few hexayurt comments:

      • This could work well in a cold climate, if you could tie it down. Mound up dirt over a barrel stove, with the stove on one side of the mound and the stove pipe running level through the dirt and up out the far side. Put the hexayurt on the level top. People have lived through Fairbanks winters in a wall tent that way; a hexayurt would be luxurious in comparison.
      • A clever pattern to tie or cut a blue tarp to fit over the top might be the answer to the tie-down problem. A UV-resistant blue tarp would be a real god-send, too, if you could find such a thing.
      • This looks as if it could have a lot of utility in the larger sizes as a temporary shelter for scout jamborees, hunting camps, and so on. A more permanent version could be a storage shed, a workshop, a studio, a recreational cabin ...
      • Getting back to the troubles in the tropics, you mention using cardboard honeycomb material for cheap shelter. Have you looked at wax-impregnated cardboard? There might be some problems with fire resistance and tape adhesion, but the material is wonderfully water resistant and strong.
    8. Re:Hexayurts by vkg · · Score: 1

      * How do you tie the hexayurts down so they don't blow away in the first breeze? I don't see any hard points to tie a rope to.

      Tape anchors. The straps of tape that go up and over the point of the building terminate in these:

      http://www.appropedia.org/Hexayurt_playa_checklist#Assemble_the_Roof_Cone

      http://www.archive.org/stream/Hexayurt_Clips_From_Combined_Endeavor/Hexayurt_Tape_Anchors_Old_Method_256kb.mp4

              * Your site has patterns for the 6 footer, and the stretch 6. Any patterns for the bigger ones?

      We found the roof cones were more or less impossible to document like the building process for the smaller hexayurts, so we switched to video instructions. It might be somebody skilled with making instructions could do it, though.

              * What tape are you using? I saw passing references, but I'm not sure of the details.

      Any bidirectional filament tape - 3M 8959 is one good option. Regular filament tape may also be enough. 3" wide or wider in all cases.

              * Have you given any thought to ways to scale this up slightly and make it more permanent? Maybe using structural insulated panels? I realize that's totally off-topic for your immediate purpose, but it might help win acceptance if it were seen as more mainstream.

      Yes. If you go to regular SIPs this geometry is probably not optimal any more, but (for example) Thermax HD is a plausible lightweight SIP for this application, or we could go to hexacomb cardboard, which was used for making SIPs in the 1980s.

      I haven't looked at wax impregnated cardboard - do you have somewhere to start learning about it?

      Thanks!

  6. #1 invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The condom should be at the top of that list...

    1. Re:#1 invention by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem is that invention can be countered by the Roman Catholic! :-P

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    2. Re:#1 invention by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't. It's not something that is made by primitive techniques from low-tech materials. Clay pots are just that, condoms aren't. Unless, of course, you consider polyurithane a low-tech material.

    3. Re:#1 invention by Mikachu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong on that one. Condoms have been in use since ancient Egyptian times. The oldest known physical condom was found in 1640, made of animal intestine. I'd hardly call that high-tech.

    4. Re:#1 invention by OneSeven · · Score: 1

      The oldest known physical condom was found in 1640, made of animal intestine. I'd hardly call that high-tech.
      I hate to be pedantic, but come on - is it so much to ask just to look at the title of the posting?.... I agree that this invention would not find a place on the list, but more due to the fact that it's not mechanical (considering TFA is by 'Popular Mechanics').
    5. Re:#1 invention by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0

      Condoms have been in use since ancient Egyptian times.
      Most slashotters have one in their wallet that's at least as old as that.
      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
  7. Chimney starter by Vrallis · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The "high efficiency stove" is just a chimney starter using pots the right size to fully close the top. Yeah, I applaud them for trying to find ways to help, but these really aren't "inventions," just re-applications of existing items and concepts.

    1. Re:Chimney starter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      these really aren't "inventions," just re-applications of existing items and concepts.
      Um, what? 99.99% of inventions are "just re-applications of existing items and concepts", including such boring and inconsequential devices as the car, the airplane, and the atomic bomb.
    2. Re:Chimney starter by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Informative

      They went out, and studied the needs, and the current stuff they used, every thing from the size of pots, to the long stick they use to stir it, and that women would leave villages for hours looking for wood, and get their arms chopped off by bad people. So, they tailor made and engineered something stable, cost effective, designed for the size/style of equipment they already use, and it uses 1/4 the fuel, meaning less trips out into the dangerous woods.. they are not just a store bought BBQ starter..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:Chimney starter by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >just re-applications of existing items and concepts.

        Cars are just horseless carriages. The web is just a BBS with better graphics. Heart surgery is just hand surgery with more blood.

      Reapplication of existing items and concepts it almost the definition of invention.

    4. Re:Chimney starter by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And everything is just an extension of Object. So what?

    5. Re:Chimney starter by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I applaud them for trying to find ways to help, but these really aren't "inventions," just re-applications of existing items and concepts. Isn't that what all inventions are?
      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    6. Re:Chimney starter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Essentially nothing is really an "invention" by your own metric (you're likely just unaware of the history in some cases, perhaps). Actually, you've hit upon the Big Lie of the patent system.

    7. Re:Chimney starter by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      In keeping with the Slashdot culture of pointing out when things have been done before I'll note that there are scads of similar stoves all over Africa, and scads of relief organizations who have done what you describe. Why Pop Sci picked out these particular ones I have no idea.

      I've seen a lot of Hedon stoves. Someone developed something they call the Ugandan Rocket. Both of those came about from some effort to design a more effective stove. Any town close to an abandoned mine or oil facility will have communal stoves made from 55 gallon drums, and smaller jinkos made from cut down drums that are great to carry into the bush.

      Since everything gets recycled in Africa they are quite skilled at fabrication.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    8. Re:Chimney starter by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I rememeber something siimilar in one of Victor Papanek's books. It was made of old car plates, IIRC. (No, not the book).

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. "Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Twenty-five years ago, my mom bought a commercial bbq grill that looks exactly like the "Save Darfur Stove" in the article. The only thing that makes this "newsworthy" in the eyes of Popular Mechanics is the association with "the poor" and the current crises in Darfur. Which is dumb: The biggest reason African countries have problems (HIV AIDS, hunger, poverty, suffering ) is because of the Africans themselves. From http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/africa/10/11/africa.billions.ap/index.html:

    Report: African wars cost billions
    October 11, 2007

    Story highlights
    Report: Africa's wars in recent decades have cost about $18 billion a year
    Report examined 23 African nations in wars between 1990 and 2005
    Report estimates fighting cost at total of about $300 billion
    Report excludes Somalia, in war since dictatorship overthrown in 1991

    DAKAR, Senegal (AP) -- About $18 billion a year has been drained from Africa by nearly two dozen wars in recent decades, a new report states, a price some officials say could've helped solve the AIDS crisis and created stronger economies in the world's poorest region.

    "This is money Africa can ill afford to lose," Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf wrote in an introduction to the report by the British charity Oxfam and two groups that seek tougher controls on small arms, Saferworld and the International Action Network on Small Arms.

    "The sums are appalling: the price that Africa is paying could cover the cost of solving the HIV and AIDS crisis in Africa, or provide education, water and prevention and treatment for tuberculosis and malaria," Sirleaf added. "Literally thousands of hospitals, schools, and roads could have been built."

    That war makes economies suffer is nothing new, but few have tried to estimate the real cost across Africa.

    Compared to peaceful countries, war-battered African nations have "50 percent more infant deaths, 15 percent more undernourished people, life expectancy reduced by five years, 20 percent more adult illiteracy, 2.5 times fewer doctors per patient and 12.4 percent less food per person," the report estimates.

    On average, the economies of African nations wracked by armed conflict contracted by 15 percent, and the impact generally worsened the longer a war lasted, the report said.

    The report based its figures on the ill effects on economic growth by estimating what growth might have been in countries if they had not suffered conflicts. During Guinea-Bissau's 1989-99 war, for example, projected growth was 5 percent, but the economy decreased 10 percent, it said.

    "This methodology almost certainly gives an underestimate," the group said in a joint statement.

    "It does not include the economic impact on neighboring countries, which could suffer from political insecurity or a sudden influx of refugees. The study only covers periods of actual combat, but some costs of war, such as increased military spending and a struggling economy, continue long after the fighting has stopped."

    The report looked at 23 African nations that had wars between 1990 and 2005, estimating the fighting cost a total of about $300 billion.

    "This is a massive waste of resources -- roughly equivalent to total international aid to Africa from major donors during the same period," the report said.

    The report did not include Somalia, which has been in a state of anarchy and war since a dictatorship was overthrown in 1991 but for which no statistics were available.

    The group blamed the availability of small arms for fueling fighting in Africa. It said about 95 percent of the weapons used in African wars -- mostly the ubiquitous Kalashnikov automatic rifle -- are imported from outside the continent.

    Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    1. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by Slugster · · Score: 1

      Here's a fun read on the matter, a bit dated now but certain to destroy any optimism you had concerning the African situation-

      Lords of Poverty by Graham Hancock

      http://www.google.com/search?num=30&hl=en&c2coff=1&safe=off&q=lords+of+poverty+graham+hancock&btnG=Search
      ~

    2. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two things: 1) What created this situation? 2) Does the fact that African countries
      have had terrible, brutal, war-mongering leaders mean that we should have no
      sympathy for the majority which would rather live in Peace?

      Also, Africa is composed of many countries, some of which are peaceful and have
      been peaceful for quite a few decades now. For example, Ghana. Ghana has not
      engaged in a war since colonial times, and yet the majority of the population
      is poor, and many could benefit from such inventions, attention and better
      international policies.

    3. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

      I love the way you included the copyright notice at the end, flaunting your evil piracy for the whole world to see :-P
      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    4. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I call their grill a waste of energy, and masturbation at beast. Engineering demands my ass. We learned how to cook with high efficiency like what that crackpot is going on about in the video. It's called a coffee can (or similar size). You simply take some tin snips to it. But then again, it doesn't take someone with a PHD to come up with something like that. I like how at the end they mentioned the stoves cost $20 a piece (vs a couple bucks at best with a coffee can), and the families that got them, had to buy them.

    5. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by Slugster · · Score: 1

      ....Two things I'd point out:
      1. Ghana is the exception. A lot of people wonder why it is, but it is. What "better international policies" would they benefit from?
      2. The book's premise is that (over the last ~30 years, and now we might say the last 45 years) whatever has been done as "international aid" has not had a positive impact on the overall situation.

      I wouldn't claim to know any solution, but would agree that what's intended as aid by foreign countries isn't working.


      From what international news I've seen, there seems to be a tendency towards populist African leaders choosing short-term non-solutions.
      Mugabe's white farm seisure efforts to redistribute wealth have been a glorious, comical disaster by everyone else's accounting. Who is keeping him in power?

      What MOST Africans are still struggling to invent is a slippery little thing called "rule of law", specifically of the non-religious variety.
      ~

    6. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by bingoathome · · Score: 1

      Hi You obviously have spent some time on that and I believe much of what you say could be true. However I do believe Europeans are not with out some guilt for the state of Africa today.

    7. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But i thought America was to blame for everything?????





      or maybe that was Microsoft........

    8. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by PolarIced · · Score: 1
      Someone once said,

      "Charity sees the need, not the cause."

      I can't remember the author; but he posessed a little more wisdom than the parent poster.

    9. Re:"Save Darfur Stove" is stupid by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Charity sees the need, not the cause."

      I can't remember the author; but he posessed a little more wisdom than the parent poster.

      Yeah, right.
      The obvious counter-quote is the old "feed a man a fish....teach a man to fish...." homily.
      Treating the need but not the cause is like draining pustules on smallpox victims. (well, not exactly, but it's equally useless)

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  9. Old is new by wrwetzel · · Score: 1

    I love the belt generator - simple, few moving parts, no bearings, etc. But it is far from new. I remember reading about such a device in a science fiction article back in the late 1960's. The real problem expressed in the story is that these things will make an awful lot of noise when they are scaled up in size or count to practical levels.

    1. Re:Old is new by Slugster · · Score: 1

      The belt generator is far from ideal.
      A wind generator can only extract power from the flow it recieves, which relates to the cross-section that it sweeps. Compared to most other types of windmills, a belt/ribbon generator doesn't sweep very much cross-section.

      ~

    2. Re:Old is new by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      The point, as I saw it, was not to achieve the ultimate in efficiency in terms of converting Watts of wind power to Watts of electricity. It's all about the cost of materials and maintenance - both up-front and down the road.

      Look at it this way: the only reason why automobiles are so popular in the 1st world is that gasoline used to be dirt cheap, and not because cars are particularly efficient at anything. Cheap trumps efficient every time. To that end, the concerns in the "developing" and war-torn places on the globe are much more immediately fiscal and resource constrained than anything else.

      Besides, the design is geared towards low wind applications where turbines are less cost efficient. At that point, it doesn't matter how inefficient you design is since it still gives you more bang for your buck than anything else given the circumstances.

    3. Re:Old is new by James+McP · · Score: 1

      Ideal? Depends. Is it a perfectly scaling source of wind power? Nope. But that doesn't exist, as yet.

      It is, if the article is to be believed, the highest efficiency wind->electricity generator for low power demands. That sounds good. It is made of simple components, most of which are almost cast-offs from the modern nations. You could build these using old walkman headsets (magnets and metal coils) and plastic garbage bags. So it's cheap and simple, both good. It coincides with relatively inexpensive and low power LED lights and radios. Fortuitious timing. In combination with those LED lights does it reduce the risks of harm to individuals(via fire from kerosene lights) as well as benefit the world as a whole by limiting the use of kerosene? Sounds good.

      Ideal in the "universally applicable" sense? No, it's not. Ideal in the "fits an assortment of criteria that results in the general betterment of individuals and the world as a whole" sense? Yep.

      --
      I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
  10. Mousetrap by wandm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you ever tried to catch mice?

    If you have, you will know how brilliant idea the normal mousetrap actually is. It's ridiculously cheap and efficient, and has practically remained the same for almost 100 years. Here is a link to the pantent:

    http://inventors.about.com/od/weirdmuseums/ig/History-of-Mousetraps/James-Doubt---Mousetrap-Patent.htm

    1. Re:Mousetrap by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall seeing a statistic somewhere (Harper's list in utne, mayhaps?) that had the number of patent applications for mousetraps one specific year being around 4. The following year, when the Emerson said the thing about "build a better mousetrap...", there were a ton more.

      Mod me off topic, (karma to burn, yadda yadda...) but I thought this crowd would appreciate it...

    2. Re:Mousetrap by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I read a report where some university or other tried various methods of controlling mice: different designs of lethal and non-lethal traps, poisons, non-lethal repellents &c.

      The best results taking all factors into account were obtained using a cat.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:Mousetrap by turing_m · · Score: 1
      The best results taking all factors into account except allergies were obtained using a cat.

      Fixed that for you. ;)

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    4. Re:Mousetrap by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      cats have problems of thier own though. The biggest being that some people have allergies to them and they can be a trip hazard.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Mousetrap by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Historically, the most significant improvement ever made to mousetrap technology, at least in terms of having a direct positive impact on sales, was printing the word "disposable" on the packaging.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  11. Appropriate Technology by EaglemanBSA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My master's degree is design of an appropriate technology vehicle -- turns out, the appropriate technology movement was abandoned, even to the point of making the phrase a faux-pas in the engineering community based on the idea that it provided mediocre solutions, and that the modern world was simply trying to placate the developing world with sub-par solutions. After projects like the OLPC however, I think it's become evident that applications of simple technology to problems that demand it deserve just as much attention. Giving someone who can't afford gasoline or buy spare car parts a car is like giving Robinson Caruso a cell phone where he can't get reception.

    --
    Quiz: True or False -- On a scale of 1 to 10, what is your middle name?
    1. Re:Appropriate Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Robinson Caruso" He was also known as "the singing castaway", wasn't he?

  12. You are right, however... by heybiff · · Score: 0

    ...the desired application is low cost, low consumption, lots of wind. Under those conditions, this device seems fine enough. Most of the Carribean recieves a pretty constant breeze year round, sometimes too much. So more area isn't much of an issue assuming efficiency is kept high enough to support the intended current draw.

    Simple, cheap, not very dangerous, sounds like a winner.

    Heybiff

    --
    Even the Sun goes down.
  13. Condoms by ChameleonDave · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read up on condoms. You'll find that they have also been made of lambskin and other materials. They are not necessarily high-tech.

  14. More about Shawn at MIT by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

    here is an article about Shawn at MIT, in a class where they come up with this kind of stuff. Article is by Pagan Kennedy in the New York Times.

  15. even more :More about Shawn at MIT by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2004/10/65276
    A MacGyver for the Third World
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/aidg/612856202/in/set-72157600466239024/
    flickr
    http://instapundit.com/archives2/010388.php
    instapundit is blogging the conference
    http://www.aidg.org/component/option,com_jd-wp/Itemid,34/p,33/
    some blog
    Shawn Frayne is the founder of Haddock Invention LLC and its recent spin-off company, Humdinger Wind Energy, LLC. The mission of these companies is two-fold. First, to create technologies that can address long-standing problems in developing countries; and second, to leverage the novel aspects of those inventions through licensing deals in capital-rich nations such as the U.S., thereby generating a self-supporting revenue stream for the projects.

    His work has so far focused in the fields of solar water disinfection, inflatable packaging, food preservation, charcoal-production, and wind power generation, with several products successfully licensed or sold. It was during his time as a student in MIT's D-Lab that Shawn first became convinced that the key inventions of the next century won't necessarily be born in wealthy countries. Rather, the new industries of the coming years will be founded on breakthrough technologies invented in Haiti or Zambia or Guatemala, where the hardest problems in the world will yield the greatest inventions.

    1. Re:even more :More about Shawn at MIT by khallow · · Score: 1

      His work has so far focused in the fields of solar water disinfection, inflatable packaging, food preservation, charcoal-production, and wind power generation, with several products successfully licensed or sold. It was during his time as a student in MIT's D-Lab that Shawn first became convinced that the key inventions of the next century won't necessarily be born in wealthy countries. Rather, the new industries of the coming years will be founded on breakthrough technologies invented in Haiti or Zambia or Guatemala, where the hardest problems in the world will yield the greatest inventions.

      I disagree with that. The hardest problems remain in the developed world. It's because the problems of the poorer countries have already been solved by the developed world. The inventions above are more ways to help progress to the massive technological infrastructure of the developed world.

      Having said that, I could see in the not so distant future, an extremely wealthy, long-lived person or group taking over one of worst of these regions and carrying it into the future. I think all you need is a combination of low corruption government and significant resources in order to push things forward. The financial gain from the huge increase of value in the inhabitants' labor as well as the increase in value from new infrastructure could make such a plan highly profitable assuming you can put 50-100 years into it.

    2. Re:even more :More about Shawn at MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new industries of the coming years will be founded on breakthrough technologies

      That is, if the fundamental principles behind these inventions were not patented, already.

    3. Re:even more :More about Shawn at MIT by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      Three things you really need to know about patents:
      1. They wear off after 20 years
      2. They are specific to a jurisdiction
      3. Governments can annul them at anytime before that
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    4. Re:even more :More about Shawn at MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Having said that, I could see in the not so distant future, an extremely wealthy, long-lived person or group taking over one of worst of these regions and carrying it into the future."

      Hilarious. Because the BLACKS are so stupid they can't make THEIR OWN countries work... It might have a little bit to do with it, don't you think?

      Care to explain why black countries have ALWAYS been third world shitholes, since time began? After all, the 'equal' blacks had at least 50,000 years (probably hundreds of thousands of years) HEAD START on 'evil' white people, yet soon after a large enough percentage of whites stopped abusing their children (around the 1200s in the U.K.) we invented 99% of the technology that is used to make the Western world what it is today.

      Hmmm....

    5. Re:even more :More about Shawn at MIT by khallow · · Score: 1

      Eh, they haven't always been "shitholes". I think they're quite capable of building a modern culture. Even with examples to work from, it's a difficult problem. My take however is that if they don't do it, then someone will do it for them. Modernization already is a profitable enterprise and I believe it'll become more so as the gap between the worst of the laggards and the technology leaders grow. My take is that in the not-so-distant future we'll see a bout of neo-colonialism coming. It probably won't be like the traditional colonialism where European powers subjugated technologically primitive cultures mostly for resource extraction. My bet is that technologically advanced neighbors will do most of the heavy lifter in this. The wars in Congo or China's ambitions in North Korea or Burma, for example, might be an example of what's to come, where neighbors seeking to "improve" for considerable profit a disfunctional country.

    6. Re:even more :More about Shawn at MIT by catlaine · · Score: 1

      I just posted video from the Breakthrough Conference where Shawn goes into more detail about the design, his thinking and motivation. http://www.aidg.org/component/option,com_jd-wp/Itemid,34/p,819/

  16. Water purification by Amoeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read an article some time ago which outlined a very low-tech way to help purify water in countries with high incidences of Malaria, Dysentery, etc. By painting the surface of huts/housing flat black and placing clear plastic water bottles on them for a few hours. The sun & UV help to kill off most parasites and biological pathogens quite effectively and at a price much cheaper than other filtration solutions. Nice low-tech solution which is cheap, effective, and requires no special equipment.

    --
    Do not taunt Happy-Fun Ball
    1. Re:Water purification by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I read an article some time ago which outlined a very low-tech way to help purify water in countries with high incidences of Malaria, Dysentery, etc. By painting the surface of huts/housing flat black and placing clear plastic water bottles on them for a few hours. The sun & UV help to kill off most parasites and biological pathogens quite effectively and at a price much cheaper than other filtration solutions. Nice low-tech solution which is cheap, effective, and requires no special equipment.

      Several years ago I read an article online about how some group was purifying water will ceramic, clay, pots. Water would be put into the pots then it would slowly seep through, when it did contaminants were removed. I just did a quick Google of purify water ceramic OR clay pots to see if I could find TFA and the first result was Oxfam on the border: Where the crisis in Darfur meets Chad and Central Africa with a paragraph on how pots with sand in them are used to purify water. Those making the pots are able to create an income in making them.

      Falcon
    2. Re:Water purification by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative

      By painting the surface of huts/housing flat black and placing clear plastic water bottles on them for a few hours. The sun & UV help to kill off most parasites and biological pathogens quite effectively

      You've got that wrong, one way or another...

      For UV sterilization, you want a highly reflective surface, that will reflect the UV back through the water a second time, as most organisms are already adapted to handle 1X sun-levels of UV. Better yet, of course, is a solar concentrator that will focus several more times as much UV at the water.

      "Black" sounds like an attempt to use solar heat to raise the water temperature, but if so, it's unlikely to confer much of its heat to the bottle of water in this manner, and especially in winter, I doubt it will get near enough to boiling to do a good job of sterilization. Plus, it's not uncommon for such methods to have difficulty killing larger hardier organisms (parasite/insect larva).

      Personally, I'm a much bigger fan of an even cheaper and simpler method; percolating water through a couple meters of fine sand to naturally remove 99% of contaminants. Instead of just killing biological contaminants, it also removes suspended solids and similar contamination that causes water to taste terrible. And it's so simple and uses widely and cheaply available materials (quite unlike paint or polished metal) even the poorest individuals can replicate sand filters.

      The WHO apparently agrees: "Under suitable circumstances, slow sand filtration may be not only the cheapest and simplest but also the most efficient method of water treatment."
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  17. stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Informative

    Which is dumb: The biggest reason African countries have problems (HIV AIDS, hunger, poverty, suffering ) is because of the Africans themselves. I'm sorry, the answer was colonialism . But thanks for playing.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:stupid by khallow · · Score: 1

      Funny how much "colonialism" is self-imposed.

    2. Re:stupid by aztektum · · Score: 1
      It might have, at one time, been an impetus for revolt, but I don't hear of many countries outside of Africa trying to conquer the continent these days and enslave it's population. No, sir, the reality is Africans commiting genocide.

      Third to last paragraph in the link you posted...

      Clearly, Africa does need the world's help. But Africa's destiny can be changed for the better only by Africans themselves. I think that's the point the GP was trying to make and I tend to agree.
      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, the problem is still the white man's fault, not:

      Robert Mugabe, imprisoning farmers and giving their working farms to friends. Zimbabwe will be in crisis in a couple years.

      Omar Bongo, head of Gabon and one of the wealthiest leaders in the world. Has vast estates in France. Nice.

      Blaise Compaore, of Burkina Faso became prez when the previous guy had an "accident."

      Joseph Kabila, of the Congo. A general in the bloodiest conflict since WWII.

      And I didn't even mention: the Janjaweed, AIDS, pirates, and diseases that the Western world has eradicated.

      I'm sure you will still blame all this on white colonialists. Because they are a product of it. But come on, white people haven't ruled in years. What does it take until we are no longer to blame?

    4. Re:stupid by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      At some point you have to take responsibility for yourself. The African nations have been getting progressively worse off since the end of colonialism. It is time to stop excusing bad government in Africa because of what the colonial powers did. The problems in Africa today are a product of bad governments. Much of Asia was colonial as well and doesn't suffer to the same degree that Africa does. If the cause of Africa's problems is colonialism, why is India wealthier today than it was when it was a colony, but Africa is poorer? BTW the article you link expresses a similar sentiment to the post that you are replying to: it is time for the First World (Europe and the US) to stop thinking that it has the duty or the ability to solve Africa's problems; the only ones with the ability to solve Africa's problems are Africans. At least that is what the wrap up of the article reads like to me.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:stupid by MrMarket · · Score: 1

      It might have, at one time, been an impetus for revolt, but I don't hear of many countries outside of Africa trying to conquer the continent these days and enslave it's population. No, sir, the reality is Africans commiting genocide.

      Third to last paragraph in the link you posted...

      Clearly, Africa does need the world's help. But Africa's destiny can be changed for the better only by Africans themselves. I think that's the point the GP was trying to make and I tend to agree. I like an over-simplification that absolves my conscience as much as the next guy, but your cop-out overlooks a few things.

      A lot of these wars stem from arbitrary state lines that combine rival ethnic groups into single states where one group usually feels the need to assert its authority over another. Guess who drew the lines in the dirt, propped up the post-colonial governments, and generally intensified blood feuds by playing various ethnic groups off each other in order to keep the exports flowing? The colonizers.

      Yes, I agree that African leaders need to get their sh!t together, but don't forget who's machinations stoked the flames.
    6. Re:stupid by pla · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sorry, the answer was colonialism. But thanks for playing.

      I know, right? Like those "New World" American colonies. Look what a shithole those ended up as... The UK's little experiment-that-rebelled, barely able to feed the rich, nevermind the poor; Canada, France's version of the same, we have to accept that they always had the climate against them anyway; And the mishmash in South America, man, a real sob-story with the Spanish taking their gold and the Vatican taking their souls.



      Colonialism makes a nice "White Man's fault" excuse. Yet, I'd have to say that we really don't have a lot of examples that do anything but contradict that stance. Europeans found Africa in a state of savagery, and such has it stayed (though they've upgraded the weaponry used in tribal warfare - Though they need to thank (or curse) the Europeans even for that humble advancement).

      The closest Africa ever came to pulling itself out of the mud (Biafra), it excised like a tumor. And how does it view attempts at Western aid to its woes? They seriously believe we've sent them condoms poisoned with AIDS to kill them all off (on a good day - On bad days, they accuse us of witchcraft).

    7. Re:stupid by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative
      But before they were colonized, Africa was still fraught with violence. Violence, war, and general disorder are hardly a uniquely European invention. African tribes have been fighting amongst each other for thousands of years. Their problems are the ancient problems of society and mankind.

      Not that colonization helped or anything.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    8. Re:stupid by feepness · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sorry, the answer was colonialism . But thanks for playing. You did read your own link, didn't you?

      All the same, nearly 50 years since the end of the colonial era, is it time perhaps for us to stop blaming the trauma of that encounter for all our problems? Who truly is to blame for this?

      To my mind, many of Africa's most profound problems stem from the way Africans look at themselves: all too often, Africa suffers from low self-esteem.


      I'm sorry, it looks like you didn't. But thanks for playing.
    9. Re:stupid by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Sure, it makes the aid workers "feel good"

      Africa suffers from low self-esteem

      Is there some kind of bizarre "symbiotic" relationship going on here?

    10. Re:stupid by KJzTMC · · Score: 0

      I know, right? Like those "New World" American colonies.
      Comparing the colonialization of North America to that of the African continent is faulty by default. When North America was colonized the ingiginous people was all but eradicated. When Africa was colonized, boarders were made where none had ever existed - down through tripes, gathering some and spreading others. Just looking at a map of Africa you will clearly see the unnatural borderdesign.

      Colonialism makes a nice "White Man's fault" excuse. Yet, I'd have to say that we really don't have a lot of examples that do anything but contradict that stance.
      First example: When the "White Man", as you gently put it, forced the Rwandan population into two imaginary tripes (from measuring the width of their noses) having the one tripe rule over the other for decades I do believe that some blame is to be put on the western society.

      And how does it view attempts at Western aid to its woes? They seriously believe we've sent them condoms poisoned with AIDS to kill them all off (on a good day - On bad days, they accuse us of witchcraft).
      This is just tabloid BS. From my time working with development aid in Uganda and Tanzania I have never herd but Western media speak of these blames. The are nothing more then the spin of a few local fairytale made up in despair of seeing the world fall apart. Frankly, your points of view are border-lining racism at best.
    11. Re:stupid by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      At some point you have to take responsibility for yourself. The African nations have been getting progressively worse off since the end of colonialism. ...
      ___
      Nations? You mean the arbitrarily made boundaries made with a rule by whities so that many different tribes with different languages, that had been killing each other for millenniums are now called a 'nation' are supposed to work?

      You think it should work as good as the Iraq 'Nation'?

    12. Re:stupid by edittard · · Score: 1

      While history has an influence most African countries have had self rule for quite some time. You might as well blame Julius Caesar for world war one - the difference is only one of degree.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    13. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you propose that the borders are poorly drawn, so we should re-draw them? So they should re-draw the borders. If they don't like their governmental form, they should change it. Where does it become their country, their region and their problem?

    14. Re:stupid by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Nations? You mean the arbitrarily made boundaries made with a rule by whities so that many different tribes with different languages, that had been killing each other for millenniums are now called a 'nation' are supposed to work?

      You think it should work as good as the Iraq 'Nation'?

      Yeah, you're right. I mean look how bad that turned out for India.
      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    15. Re:stupid by SIIHP · · Score: 1

      "Nations? You mean the arbitrarily made boundaries made with a rule by whities so that many different tribes with different languages, that had been killing each other for millenniums are now called a 'nation' are supposed to work?"

      You mean like Europe, right?

      Yeah that place is a shithole for sure...

      And the Africans have redrawn the "arbitrary" boundaries several times in several places.

      Stop trying so hard to be guilty.

      --
      I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
    16. Re:stupid by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      You mean like Europe, right?

      Yeah that place is a shithole for sure...
      ________

      Yep. The trouble in Belgium right now between the 2 language blocks, Northern Ireland, the basques separatists, Corsica ditto, and and and.

    17. Re:stupid by SIIHP · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you agree that your point was ridiculous.

      --
      I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
    18. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      If the cause of Africa's problems is colonialism, why is India wealthier today than it was when it was a colony, but Africa is poorer? First of all, Africa > India; One is a whole continent, the other is a country.

      Secondly, India was an advanced civilization long before Europeans acquired firearms. It's not like they were at the hunter-gatherer stage when they got colonized, they had a culture adapted to taking over an empire's legacy.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    19. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, the answer was colonialism. But thanks for playing.

      I know, right? Like those "New World" American colonies. In your stupid little world, the American natives are thriving and have not been replaced by the descendants of colonists?
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    20. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      But before they were colonized, Africa was still fraught with violence. Violence, war, and general disorder are hardly a uniquely European invention. African tribes have been fighting amongst each other for thousands of years. Their problems are the ancient problems of society and mankind.

      Not that colonization helped or anything.

      Yeah, Africa was not immune to something that is endemic to every human population, ever. Wow, you got me there?

      From mah link:

      Families and whole tribes had been split up into separate countries. Rival kingdoms, who had for centuries shared borders and warred with each other, suddenly found themselves redefined as one people.

      Colonialism took rivalries and played them against each other. You know the Hutu and Tutsi of Rwanda? The Belgians took one tribe and declared them the aristocracy of the new country they had made. One tribe got the cushy government jobs, the other tribe were just niggers.
      And in 1994, there was a backlash.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    21. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, the answer was colonialism . But thanks for playing. You did read your own link, didn't you?

        All the same, nearly 50 years since the end of the colonial era, is it time perhaps for us to stop blaming the trauma of that encounter for all our problems? Who truly is to blame for this?
        To my mind, many of Africa's most profound problems stem from the way Africans look at themselves: all too often, Africa suffers from low self-esteem.


        I'm sorry, it looks like you didn't. But thanks for playing. I did read my own link, but unlike you I didn't quote out of context to give it a spin that goes counter to the article as a whole:

      Families and whole tribes had been split up into separate countries. Rival kingdoms, who had for centuries shared borders and warred with each other, suddenly found themselves redefined as one people.

      All the same, nearly 50 years since the end of the colonial era, is it time perhaps for us to stop blaming the trauma of that encounter for all our problems? Who truly is to blame for this?
      To my mind, many of Africa's most profound problems stem from the way Africans look at themselves: all too often, Africa suffers from low self-esteem.

      All too often, Africans see themselves mirrored in the eyes of the west - of those rich former colonial powers who like to regard Africans only as victims.
      And, all too often, Africans become the distorted images reflected in these mirrors.


      Funny, you seem to have chosen to mention a claim of a continent-wide low self-esteem, but you skipped over the part where it's blamed on, huhlookadathowweird, colonialism.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    22. Re:stupid by g8oz · · Score: 1

      How did this get modded insightful? The colonies in the Western Hemisphere crushed the natives remember? They are arguably as worse off as the Africans. Logic please!

    23. Re:stupid by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You comment as if India was a unified culture/country when the British colonized it. The British turned India into a single country. It wasn't one when they arrived. Or are you saying that Africa would be better off if it had been turned into a single country by the colonial powers? If your point is that Africa is bigger than India, why aren't at least some parts of Africa comparable to India?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    24. Re:stupid by feepness · · Score: 1

      Families and whole tribes had been split up into separate countries. Rival kingdoms, who had for centuries shared borders and warred with each other, suddenly found themselves redefined as one people. So whose fault is it? They cannot change their borders if they like now? The Soviet Union broke up with a minimum of bloodshed.

      All the same, nearly 50 years since the end of the colonial era, is it time perhaps for us to stop blaming the trauma of that encounter for all our problems? Who truly is to blame for this? To my mind, many of Africa's most profound problems stem from the way Africans look at themselves: all too often, Africa suffers from low self-esteem. Ok, that's my quote.

      All too often, Africans see themselves mirrored in the eyes of the west - of those rich former colonial powers who like to regard Africans only as victims. And, all too often, Africans become the distorted images reflected in these mirrors. And so how Africans see themselves is the fault of how someone else sees them?

      Really, you've done nothing but buttress my argument. The whole article was saying the same thing: Colonialism sucked but it's time to take responsibility for ourselves.
    25. Re:stupid by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Of course, the Tutsi were *already* the aristocracy. You know what the difference between them was? The Tutsi had five or more cows, and the Hutu did not.

    26. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Or are you saying that [...] If your point is that .

      India was an advanced civilization long before Europeans acquired firearms. It's not like they were at the hunter-gatherer stage when they got colonized, they had a culture adapted to taking over an empire's legacy.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    27. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Families and whole tribes had been split up into separate countries. Rival kingdoms, who had for centuries shared borders and warred with each other, suddenly found themselves redefined as one people. So whose fault is it? The fault of those that forced that situation: The colonial powers.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    28. Re:stupid by feepness · · Score: 1

      The fault of those that forced that situation: The colonial powers. And how long does this fault last for? A hundred years? Two hundred? Forever?

      Just because a father abuses their child does not mean that child can blame the father if they should do the same.
    29. Re:stupid by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      So, your saying that all of Africa was at the hunter-gatherer stage when it was colonized?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    30. Re:stupid by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      If you read that link it points out that colonialism has been over for 50+years.
      Both India and Pakistan where colonies for just as long and yet they have made a lot more progress than most of the African nations. I think you are also taking the simple easy answer. But thank you for playing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    31. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      single states where one group usually feels the need to assert its authority over another
      They could, presumably, resist this need. They choose not to. Because at the end of the day, niggers are greedy dumb monkeys.
    32. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The fault of those that forced that situation: The colonial powers. And how long does this fault last for? At least as long as they keep it up.

      Today, Africa is the most war-torn continent in the world. Over the past fifteen years, thirty-two of the fifty-three African countries experienced violent conflict. During the cold war years (1950-1989), the U.S. sent $1.5 billion in arms and training to Africa thus setting the stage for the current round of conflicts. From 1991-1995 the U.S. increased the amount of weapons and other military assistance to fifty of the total fifty-three African countries. Over the years these U.S. funded wars have been responsible for the deaths of millions of Africans, and the subsequent displacement, disease, and starvation of many millions more.

      In June of 2002, leaders from the eight most powerful countries in the world (the G8) met to form a New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) as an "anti-poverty" campaign. One glaring omission, however, is the consultation and representation of the African nations. Not one of the eight leaders was from Africa. The danger of the NEPAD proposal is that it fails to protect Africa from exploitation of its resources. NEPAD is akin to Plan Columbia in its attempt to employ Western development techniques to provide economic opportunities for international investment. Welcomed by the G8 nations, this development plan reads like a mad dash to grab up as much of Africa's remaining resources as possible.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    33. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      So, your saying that all of Africa was at the hunter-gatherer stage when it was colonized? No, I'm saying you're a troll without a point, simply nitpicking for something to flame me about. FO&DIAF.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    34. Re:stupid by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      No, my point is that if Africa is such a mess just because of colonialism, why isn't India? You still haven't given a reason why all of Africa has become poorer since colonialism ended and India has become wealthier. I would suggest that the reason is that Africa and wealthy nations have accepted the idea that Africans are bot able to fix what is wrong in Africa, while India has aggressively rejected the solutions that wealthy nations sought to implement and acted to solve its problems itself. You seem to think that Africans are not able to determine their own destiny.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    35. Re:stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      all of Africa has become poorer since colonialism ended [reference needed]
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  18. Duct tape by so+many+toms+(me+too · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeesh... enough said.

  19. imagine what we could find by SoyChemist · · Score: 0, Troll

    So much great science could come from sifting through old peer reviewed literature and picking up where old scientists left off.

  20. Chinese Type 72 by hedley · · Score: 1

    This nefarious landmine I wound not say has 'helped' but it surely has changed lives. Its a plastic mine very little metal content, inexpensive and is the most widely seeded mine in the world. This is the kind of change the world did not and should not ever have needed. Perhaps one day, a high tech soln can dispose of these low tech scourges. There has been a lot of progress but still, its the de-miner with the stick and a face shield that gets them out today.

    1. Re:Chinese Type 72 by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Why do you need a high-tech solution for de-mining? All you need is a fast-breeding nuisance animal that is heavy enough to set off the mines. Release a few of them into the minefields, and wait. As the minefields get emptier, you sterilise the animals (two housebricks will do, if there's nothing better available) before you release them ..... that way you don't replace one problem with another.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  21. Use them NOW by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Use these energy saving systems NOW in countries like the USA and Europe. Conserve energy NOW, especially oil and natgas. Oil can be made into all kinds of amazing substances and burning it up as fuel is like making logs out of $20 bills. Natgas is great for making into fertiliser. We need oil for materials and natgas for food. We need to use Other Technologies for electrical generation (Solar, Wind, hydro, nuke, geothermal, whatever) so we can stretch out our supply of petrochemicals as long as possible.

    People can do their part by using these personal conservation technologies in their own lives.

    A few times a week, I set out a big pot of stew or chili or soup in my solar cooker. Even in the dead of winter, I come home to a hot meal at the end of the day. It Works. And it's awesome.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Use them NOW by barocco · · Score: 1

      I thought corporations and free market took care of optimal usage of fossil fuel and only big-govt Democrats'd advocate subsidies for ethanols and all those bullshit alternatives... oh, wait...

    2. Re:Use them NOW by shomon2 · · Score: 1

      Where did you get, or how did you make the solar cooker?

    3. Re:Use them NOW by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      I bought a book. It has instructions. You can buy it on Amazon

      It's called Cooking With the Sun" by Dan and Beth Halacy.

      Go for it! They're dead cheap to make and if built really well and cared for, can last a lifetime. The energy savings are absurdly huge, and the experience of "slow food" cooking is good preparation.

      I would also recommend learning about hay box cooking... it's not solar, but it uses an order of magnitude less energy - all you do is heat up the contents to a high degree of temperature, and then stick the whole thing in a highly insulated box. Come back a few hours later and bingo: food is cooked.

      I want to make a "hay box" out of space shuttle tiles...

      RS

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  22. condoms by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    It shouldn't. It's not something that is made by primitive techniques from low-tech materials. Clay pots are just that, condoms aren't. Unless, of course, you consider polyurithane a low-tech material.

    Ah but as with many other things made today condoms used to be made by "primitive" materials. At one tyme condoms were made from rubber, which spawned their nickname, "rubbers". And originally rubber, like plastics, were made from plants. Rubber is the sap of trees, and plastic was made from plant cellulose. Kodak, the photography business, did some research on making plastics from trees. After all film was made from plastic.

    Falcon
  23. Gotta say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That wind belt generator is pretty damn clever.

  24. Other Great Low Tech Stoves by codeknitter · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Stoves BioEnergy Discussion List (web site http://www.bioenergylists.org/) is a really great resource if you are interested in the global effort to build better, cheaper, low tech cooking stoves. Appropriate technology isn't dead, it's thriving in a lot of these areas where there are limited resources, and not a lot of press coverage. This is My favorite Darfur stove: http://www.bioenergylists.org/en/taxonomy/term/909 It can be built in the refugee camp instead of shipped there, and it can easily be modified to handle charcoal. Fuel flexibility is important when there are limited resources.

  25. low tech invention harms lives by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    The lowest of them all: politics.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  26. I prefer by n6kuy · · Score: 1

    ... Popular Mechanic's older, hi tech solutions.

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    1. Re:I prefer by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why does a computer need a steering wheel?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:I prefer by MLease · · Score: 1

      For driving on the Information Superhighway, obviously!

      -Mike

      --
      I'm sorry; I don't know what I was thinking!
  27. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the better story than the submitted one.

  28. 2D and 3D printing by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    TFA showed an open-source 3D printer. Hell, I cannot even get a decent 2D printer that does not con me into buying a new ink cartridge every 6 months whether I use it or not. I'm still waiting for a 2D breakthru.

  29. Winiarski Rocket Stove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is a very inexpensive stove design that can be produced for around $1.

    http://www.repp.org/discussiongroups/resources/stoves/apro/designp/Design%20Poster.pdf

    It's basically a chimney stove, but adds insulation to keep the temperatures
    higher in the combustion chamber which causes complete combustion (no smoke)
    and tries to keep the cross sectional area of the chimney constant even as it flows
    around the pot by making the hot gasses pass very close to the pot.
    This results in higher heat transfer

    These principles can be used in many different stoves. Here is one
    cleverly developed by Ken Goyer which uses 6 bricks made from local
    clay, fired and then wired together and can be produced for around 1 dollar. He has
    produced 10,000 of these.

    http://www.aiduganda.org/cgi-bin/s-mart.pl?command=showpic&currpic=Stoves/lira01454.jpg&start=0

    More information can be found at the approvecho research institute

    http://www.aprovecho.org/ or by googling for "rocket stove"

  30. Ancient Chinese Condoms by evought · · Score: 1

    Wrong on that one. Condoms have been in use since ancient Egyptian times. The oldest known physical condom was found in 1640, made of animal intestine. I'd hardly call that high-tech.

    I cannot find an online reference for this, but I read a (dead tree) journal article a good while back about archaeologists in China who found a (relatively) well preserved oiled-silk condom in the bottom of an old latrine on the order of a few thousand years old. There was speculation on whether it was effective for anything or used more as a fetish.

  31. Time for some new contracts by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

    Has anyone informed Halliburton of any of these things ..... I'm sure they can fluff them up and make a tidy profit.

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
    1. Re:Time for some new contracts by bestiarosa · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up. I mistakenly modded it flamebait. It obviously isnt. Sorry, parent.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
  32. African dictators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet, I'd have to say that we really don't have a lot of examples that do anything but contradict that stance.

    Most of the post colonial/post independence Africa was cursed by dictators supported by Western powers - which meant even the independence granted by the West was not useful in institution building, free and fair elections and so forth. Mobutu Sese Seko is a good example. South Africa became independent recently. So it is indeed a "White Mans Burden".

    If you reimburse Africa and other colonized Asian countries for the plundered loot, most of the Western Europe would be bankrupt.

    1. Re:African dictators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe will be bankrupt, and instead of enriching the African poor, the great African leaders will simply use the money to buy MORE weapons and fund MORE wars and buy MORE US$2 million cars while their populace die of AIDS.

  33. One example. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    ANGOLA. Particularly as it relates to UNITA and FNLA. You might want to do a bit of reading on how that little fuck-up created that other raging mess that is currently known as Congo and our direct relationship to that evil son-of-a-bitch Mobutu Sese Seko as late as ten years ago. ...and that's just one long-enduring example. I mean, come on, we actively funded and armed them to the teeth to ensure they wouldn't become socialists, which, predictably, wasn't exactly successful, except in totally destroying what little development there was. Hell, even South Africa is now run by a socialist-communist coalition. So, when do we storm the beaches of Durban?

  34. Re:A cook stove: band aid for war torn Darfur by lena_10326 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    To the person who modded me Flamebait, my URL pic is for you.

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
  35. LifeStraw? by egghat · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you meant this one?

    LifeStraw

    or with some critical comments added: Wikipedia: LifeStraw

    Bye egghat

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  36. Hello! by kyshtock · · Score: 1
    What you mean is that europeans haven't yet killed all those africans... like they killed the amerindians.

    Back to your hole, please!

    --
    Bite my shiny metal... oops... Nevermind!
  37. Re: six classes of simple machines by giafly · · Score: 1

    The six classes of simple machines - wedge, ramp, screw, lever, wheel & axle, and pulley, are fundamental to how the machanical world works. I'd have hoped this is covered early on in anyone's education, particularly anyone with any sort of interest in 'how the world works'.
    If these classes are fundamental, what type of simple machine is the cook-stove mentioned in the article? Also which of the 6 types matches a bow, or a sled, or a boat? In reality the six classes are not fundamental at all, but just an arbitrary list of technologies.
    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  38. Way more than 100 years old by SIIHP · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweating

    I think that predates your example by a few years.

    And honestly, that two inventions share similarities does not mean that there aren't also differences. Your "safe" doesn't really resemble the pot in pot refrigerator at all.

    --
    I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
  39. Nope by SIIHP · · Score: 1

    http://www.allerca.com/

    "The best results taking all factors into account were obtained using a cat"

    Re-fixed your "fix".

    --
    I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
  40. Re:A cook stove: band aid for war torn Darfur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "To the person who modded me Flamebait, my URL pic is for you."

    Showing off your counting skill huh? God that bitch is ugly...

  41. Re: six classes of simple machines by E.+Edward+Grey · · Score: 1

    That's not true. The others you mention aren't actually "machines" at all. A machine's true purpose is to transfer work from a high-distance, low-force form into a high-force, low-distance form, or vice versa. The six simple machines are somewhat fundamental, although it could be argued that the wheel & axle are a continuous form of the lever, or that the screw is a particular 3-dimensional use of the wedge.

    --

    ---don't make me break out my red pen.

  42. Re: six classes of simple machines by wed128 · · Score: 1

    The cook stove isn't a mechanical device. A bow is a mechanical source (like a spring), but no advantage, unless it's something fancy such as a compound bow, which uses pulleys to manipulate the force from the bow. A sled or boat has no mechanical advantage either, they just reduce friction.

    These six simple machines can be broken down further, given that a screw is a special case of a ramp, and a wheel and axle is a special case of a lever.

  43. consequences by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    It might have, at one time, been an impetus for revolt, but I don't hear of many countries outside of Africa trying to conquer the continent these days and enslave it's population. No, sir, the reality is Africans commiting genocide.

    Third to last paragraph in the link you posted...

    Clearly, Africa does need the world's help. But Africa's destiny can be changed for the better only by Africans themselves. I think that's the point the GP was trying to make and I tend to agree. Imagine I shoot you in the legs and leave you stranded in the forest... Now it's YOUR problem.

    What? You're not going to blame me for the fact that it's hard to walk when you've been shot in the legs, are you?
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  44. Re:Hexayurt website by IdeaMan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Your page totally stinks. Gives no real information, only fluff marketspeak. This is Slashdot, so consider your target audience.
    http://www.appropedia.org/Hexayurt_Playa
    and
    http://www.appropedia.org/Hexayurt_playa_checklist
    are MUCH better sources of real information.

    --
    They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  45. You're not being pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The oldest known physical condom was found in 1640, made of animal intestine. I'd hardly call that high-tech.

    I hate to be pedantic, but come on - is it so much to ask just to look at the title of the posting?.... I agree that this invention would not find a place on the list, but more due to the fact that it's not mechanical (considering TFA is by 'Popular Mechanics').

    The Title of the Posting:

    Low-tech Inventions That Help Change Lives

    You're not being pedantic, I am. The title doesn't state anything about the inventions having to be mechanical. The article summary only states that the inventions:

    1) Are made using low-tech materials
    2) Use low-tech assembly methods
    3) Improve living conditions is third-world countries.

    Just because the article came from Popular Mechanics doesn't mean the inventions need to be mechanical.
  46. Re:Hexayurt website by vkg · · Score: 1

    Well, do bear in mind that people arriving at the site may be people interested in things like the mass evacuation plan ("Networked Domestic Disaster Relief") or refugee use. I did put the technical stuff just one click off the home page.

    But point taken, I will try and put more technical stuff back up front.

  47. Re:Another idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you could do the world a favor and go kill yourself?

  48. Re:A cook stove: band aid for war torn Darfur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh. Why do people with uid's over 1M get to post anyway?

  49. meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    If you read that link it points out that colonialism has been over for 50+years. In June of 2002, leaders from the eight most powerful countries in the world (the G8) met to form a New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) as an "anti-poverty" campaign. One glaring omission, however, is the consultation and representation of the African nations. Not one of the eight leaders was from Africa. The danger of the NEPAD proposal is that it fails to protect Africa from exploitation of its resources. NEPAD is akin to Plan Columbia in its attempt to employ Western development techniques to provide economic opportunities for international investment. Welcomed by the G8 nations, this development plan reads like a mad dash to grab up as much of Africa's remaining resources as possible.

    According to Robert Murphy of the US State Department's Office of African Analysis, Africa is important to "the diversification of our sources of imported oil" away from the Middle East. The U.S. currently gets 15% of its total oil imports from the African continent. By 2015, that figure will be 25%. Rather than a plan to reduce African poverty, NEPAD is a mechanism for ensuring that U.S. and other Western investments are protected.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:meet the new boss, same as the old boss by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Bkkkkkk. That wasn't an answer good try thank you for playing again. Why did India and Pakistan do so much better?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Bkkkkkk. That wasn't an answer good try thank you for playing again. Why did India and Pakistan do so much better? Moving the goalpost huh? Go fuck yourself.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:meet the new boss, same as the old boss by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Nope it is still the same. Blaming colonialism is just an easy out. India and Pakistan where colonies just as long as any place in Africa. Nice try shifting the blame to the US for Africa on this one.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      India and Pakistan where colonies just as long as any place in Africa. India was an empire as old as recorded history before it fell under the rule of the british empire and the most advanced civilization around for a good long while.

      I am not continuing a conversation with a being that ignores that. Go learn about the world around you instead of trolling slashdot, it'll do you good.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:meet the new boss, same as the old boss by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that India was culturally superior to the Nations in Africa? Or maybe there where other factors involved with the problems in Africa than colonialism.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  50. Engineers without borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, the ATDT (appropriate technology design team) portion of EWB (Engineers Without Borders) is not mentioned in this article. In particular, I personally know this group of engineers in the bay area, who worked hard to improve the functionality of the Darfur stove. No credit is given to them in the article or anywhere else, as far as I can tell. However, we all know the nature of this work is selfless, which is what EWB is ultimately about. What is most important is the proliferation of such inventions wherever they may be needed.

  51. And when ... by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    ... do we see one powering an OLPC?

    It'd have to be a bigger with more, and better, magnets & coils, but that idea would be ideal for the purpose. The man's a genius.