Slashdot Mirror


Dell Releases Ubuntu 7.10-Powered PCs

sjvn writes "The official word will be out any minute now, but in the meantime DesktopLinux has learned that Dell will be releasing Ubuntu 7.10 on a laptop and desktop with immediate availability. And, as an extra added bonus, they're tossing in legal DVD-playback capability. In a word: Neat."

75 comments

  1. Silly Me by Skraut · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here I thought computers were powered by electricity.

    Linux keeps getting better and better every day it seems.

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:Silly Me by Facetious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Electricity! Heavens, no. Windows PCs are powered by bluster, Macs by ego, *BSD systems by antisocial energy, and Linux boxen by the collective goodwill of those yearning to breath free. (Excuse me. My bias is showing.)

      --
      Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
    2. Re:Silly Me by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here I thought computers were powered by electricity. They are. They put Tux on a hamster wheel attached to a generator. Bastards.
      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:Silly Me by LrdDimwit · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll say your bias is showing. 'Bluster' is an interesting euphemism for "souls of the damned".

    4. Re:Silly Me by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      I believe Ubuntu experiments with different animals in variously-sized hamster wheels each release, hence the weird version names: grumpy gibbon, wheezing warthog, faltering fawn, etc.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    5. Re:Silly Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and apparently Ego is what works best, then.

  2. Pitty by caffiend666 · · Score: 1

    Pitty their website doesn't work with Firefox 1.5 in Linux, I can't choose options such as OS. Doubt this qualifies as being slashdotted. Dell, we love you guys, but first things first....

    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
    1. Re:Pitty by osssmkatz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Post this in the firefox forums, but make sure you're running the latest version (the latest patch). It's a bug I encountered on one other site with popup menus not working. You can also order by phone.

      --Sam

    2. Re:Pitty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firefox 1.5.x has been EOL for a long time now. Upgrading Firefox to 2.0.0.11 will probably fix your problem.

    3. Re:Pitty by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      At this point he might as well wait for FF3.

    4. Re:Pitty by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Why? Is it going to take a month or something to download FF2, or is Firefox 2 so hard to install that it'd just be too much effort to install right now?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Pitty by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      No, it's just that he's already waited this long, and FF3 is already in (2nd) beta. Why upgrade just in time to upgrade again?

    6. Re:Pitty by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because there's no downside?

      I mean, honestly, you're making it sound like this is unbelievably hard work. We're talking about downloading a program that installs without any trouble at all, and "just works" when upgrading. It's going to take him all of one minute to go through the upgrade process, if that, plus whatever time it takes to download. Twice in two months? Most people spend more effort switching on their computers in the morning.

      And, honestly, upgrading to FF3 as soon as it is released is probably unwise anyway. I know I'm not going to. I'd prefer to wait a week or two to see the kinks ironed out.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Pitty by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to make it sound hard. It's just that if he felt that upgrading was worth it, he would have done so already.

    8. Re:Pitty by Sudheer_BV · · Score: 1

      Upgrading software is a never ending story. It is very likely that his distro provides Firefox 2.x. It's just a matter of running the update program. Waiting for another release of Firefox doesn't make sense. Well, he can also wait for Firefox 4.x, 5.x, 6.x, ...

      --
      Sudheer Satyanarayana
      www.techchorus.net
  3. that's cool and all... by jollyreaper · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, but does it run Linux?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:that's cool and all... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but does it run Linux? Note to the humor-impaired: that was a joke.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:that's cool and all... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      I they don't find it funny anymore. Those that do don't seem to be getting mad points.

    3. Re:that's cool and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but does it run Linux?
      Note to the humor-impaired: that was a joke.

      Note to the humor-impaired: barely.
    4. Re:that's cool and all... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Mad points? Sounds dangerous. I'll have to watch out for them.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  4. first duke nukem forever now this by kie · · Score: 5, Funny

    The question is which will be first -
    dell actually promoting linux on their front page or duke nukem forever going gold...

    Seriously they must have sold a lot of the linux line to be doing this.
    I bet all the chairs in Redmond are very afraid at the moment.

    --
    living the dream
    1. Re:first duke nukem forever now this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If I was a chair in Redmond I'd be afraid with Steve Ballmer around.....

    2. Re:first duke nukem forever now this by 3on3 · · Score: 0

      you forgot the "hell freezing over" option.

    3. Re:first duke nukem forever now this by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Personally I think this story is barely newsworthy. It's the *same* models as previously announced but with an upgraded distro. It means they haven't scrapped it but they haven't expanded it either, and using the latest distro is hardly a surprise. In about 6 months you'll see a switch to Hardy Heron, but don't let me spoil the surprise (whoops, guess I just did). Now, if they decided to keep offering the old distro that'd be big news - see XP vs Vista.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  5. DVD Playback by Poppler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And, as an extra added bonus, they're tossing in legal DVD-playback capability. That's the real new here as far as I'm concerned. This is what needs to be done if they're going to try to sell these things to the home PC market.

    If they're smart, they'll continue on that path and add out-of-the-box support for mp3, aac, and other non-Free multimedia.
    --
    What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
    1. Re:DVD Playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic, but your sig is awesome.

    2. Re:DVD Playback by kellyb9 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not off topic AT ALL. If Linux or for that matter Ubuntu is ever going to become mainstream this NEEDS to happen. DVD playback has been sore spot for Linux for several years, and while it's possible, from what I understand it's legality is somewhat questionable which is why most versions don't include it out of the box.

  6. What if I want to watch a crappy DVD? by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny
    "In fact, one of the key requests from customers interested in Linux is the ability to watch their favorite DVD movies."

    Of course, if it's not your favorite DVD, then the player won't work.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    1. Re:What if I want to watch a crappy DVD? by russlar · · Score: 1

      Of course, if it's not your favorite DVD, then the player won't work. Just MST3K it, it'll work fine.
      --
      Anybody want my mod points?
  7. Is the DVD playback crippled? by WK2 · · Score: 1

    I haven't read TFA (been here a while). Is the DVD playback crippled? Will it refuse to skip previews and such? It doesn't sound like a fully functional DVD player would get the blessing, and the promise not to sue, from the MPAA.

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    1. Re:Is the DVD playback crippled? by webmaster404 · · Score: 1

      Doubt it. Dell just probably paid the patent fees and added deCSS.

      --
      There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    2. Re:Is the DVD playback crippled? by KingSkippus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is the DVD playback crippled? Will it refuse to skip previews and such?

      A DVD player that refuses to skip previews and such isn't crippled, it's working exactly as it's designed to.

      I'm not saying that forcing you to watch commercials is a good thing, I think it's awful. But let's not act like players are supposed to completely ignore PUOs on DVDs, they're not. Those that do are the ones that aren't working as the specs detail they're supposed to, they just happen to be doing so in a manner that's convenient to you.

      In an ideal world, media companies would use PUOs responsibly and not piss off their consumers. In reality, their abuse of PUOs have caused many of us to seek ways around their pig-headedness by using DVD players that ignore elements of the specifications. It's sad, but we need to recognize the situation for what it is, not what we wish it were.

    3. Re:Is the DVD playback crippled? by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But let's not act like players are supposed to completely ignore PUOs on DVDs, they're not. Those that do are the ones that aren't working as the specs detail they're supposed to...

      According to whom? If we're talking the UOP specification, I can't think of many end users that would AGREE to have their control taken from them. I'd also be willing to bet that if asked "Would you like to let the movie studio control what you watch on your legally purchased DVD, or would YOU like to choose?" darn near 100% of the users would indicate the latter. If you check the linked article above, pay close attention to the last sentence in the first paragraph.

      Wonton abuse of a published spec is one of the first steps to render said spec obsolete.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    4. Re:Is the DVD playback crippled? by tepples · · Score: 1

      But let's not act like players are supposed to completely ignore PUOs on DVDs, they're not. What if a DVD player were to honor the first consecutive 15 seconds of a UOP, and then ignore UOP after that? That much time is enough to display copyright notices and the like.
    5. Re:Is the DVD playback crippled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sounds like a specification that includes an antifeature. It's unfortunate that some companies choose to include anti-features in their products and specifications.

      Region-coded DVDs, copy-protection measures, and Apple's optional DRM music store--where users initially paid more for the DRM-free tracks--are also excellent examples. It takes a large amount of work to build these systems and users rarely benefit from or request them. Like blackmail, users can sometimes pay technology providers to not include an antifeature in their technology.

      Adding an anti-feature to a product is crippling, regardless if the anti-feature is written into the specification or not.

    6. Re:Is the DVD playback crippled? by Erpo · · Score: 1

      Adding an anti-feature to a product is crippling, regardless if the anti-feature is written into the specification or not.

      I'm not positive, but I think you have the definition of an anti-feature backwards. At first, I thought an anti-feature meant a bad feature, or a feature that hurts users. However, note the following from the linked article:

      [The availability of RAW format images from a camera] is an example of an anti-feature. Anti-features are sold to customers as features but are fundamental or unavoidable aspects of systems that can only be removed or withheld through technological effort.

      After reading this, I think an anti-feature in this context would be a lack of DRM. For example, if you are offered a movie at a premium price because it has no DRM, that's an anti-feature. The publisher didn't have to do anything to provide a movie with no DRM. In fact, the publisher had to go through extra effort to take away the benefits of DRM-less media in order to create the inferior DRM'd product.

      Another example of an anti-feature would be a full version of a shareware program that doesn't contain nag screens. The lack of nag screens is good, and it's an anti-feature because it's a fundamental or unavoidable aspect of the system. When you create a new program like "Hello world", it doesn't automatically draw a nag screen when you run it. That's something you have to work to add.

  8. Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had been seriously considering getting a Ubuntu laptop for a while now, but held off because they were still using Feisty. Time to buy myself a Christmas present!

    1. Re:Sweet! by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 1

      I wish they cost less than a comparable windows system. They're acting like they are giving you a free OS, when they're really getting more money off of the Linux machines. Maybe they feel they incurred a greater cost finding and paying people that could support it? *shrug* Might as well continue building my own.

      --
      "Little is much when little you need."
  9. 14" display by gorbachev · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wish they had at least a 15" display on these things. I hate to squint.

    Looks like Ubuntu 7.04 on 15" laptops, for now.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:14" display by ls+-la · · Score: 1

      If you seriously need a 15" monitor, you should get your eyes checked out. I'm posting this from my laptop with a 7" screen, and I don't really have to squint on this. Really, adding a bigger screen like that is just going to make the laptop bigger and heavier, and less appealing to carry around.

    2. Re:14" display by gorbachev · · Score: 0, Troll

      Gee, thanks for assuming to know how I prefer to use my computers better than I do. Excuse me for not preferring a pecker sized monitor like you.

      I guess your eyesight is just better than mine. Congratulations.

      It never, ever ceases to amaze me how some idiots can't understand that people have different preferences, hence it might actually make sense for companies like Dell to give MORE choices to customers.

      But hey, I'm glad you're happy with your laptop. I'm very happy with mine. It has a 17" display. Love it. Wish I could run Linux on it.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    3. Re:14" display by piojo · · Score: 1

      It never, ever ceases to amaze me how some idiots can't understand that people have different preferences. That was well said. Thas aside, small screens would also a problem for coders who absolutely need to multi-task, and whose productivity would be hampered if we couldn't fit multiple windows on the screen at the same time. Well, I guess I should just be writing code on 40 character lines; shame on me for being lazy.
      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    4. Re:14" display by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      "But hey, I'm glad you're happy with your laptop. I'm very happy with mine. It has a 17" display. Love it. Wish I could run Linux on it." What's stopping you? Download Ubuntu and try the live CD, it won't cripple you.

  10. Europe? by BlueParrot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, it doesn't matter too much as there are other options in Sweden, but will these be sold in Europe?

  11. Why is this news? by calebt3 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Besides the DVD-playback, what is so important about this? Vista machines were available from day one of its release. No major OEMs are still selling Win2K. OEMs will always move on to the next OS offered by MS, Canonical, Ret Hat, Novell, etc. Ubuntu PCs being easier to find on Dell's site would be more newsworthy.

    1. Re:Why is this news? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Besides the DVD-playback, what is so important about this? Because it reminds us that a major PC builder is still selling PCs with an operating system not published by Microsoft or Apple.
  12. Gee, thanks by epp_b · · Score: 1, Funny

    And, as an extra added bonus, they're tossing in legal DVD-playback capability. In a word: Neat
    Wow, it's great to know that I can have my computer turned against me, and for it to be legitimate.
  13. Even sillyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought they were releasing Ubuntu 7.10 on PowerPC chipped computers! Hey, maybe they'll get Flash working on Linux for PPC was my first thought... :)

  14. Nvidia graphics ? by klapaucjusz · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    For graphics, the 530N comes with a 128MB Nvidia GeForce 8300GS graphics card.

    So it still needs proprietary drivers, right?

    1. Re:Nvidia graphics ? by StonyUK · · Score: 1

      You can also get it with the Intel X3100 which has open drivers I believe.

    2. Re:Nvidia graphics ? by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      No, you can run an Nvidia card on FOSS drivers. You just won't get the full range of 3D capabilities that you would get with a proprietary driver. Of course, Ubuntu makes it easy to use the proprietaries, as it comes with them pre-loaded on the CD. So it's not a big deal to get them setup and loaded.

      Of course, if you are one of those purists who wants only FOSS software on your machine, I doubt very much you will be buying a Dell laptop anyway, so your opinion holds no weight.

      The rest of us just want our stuff to work, and Dell + Ubuntu = IJW (It Just Works)

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  15. Linux Cost More? by phkhd · · Score: 2, Informative

    So I went through and customized the same model with Windows Vista and with Ubuntu, to the same configuration (better LCD and larger battery, but otherwise stock). The Ubuntu model was roughly $854, and the Windows Model was roughly $824 (I might be off by a few bucks). But why is the Ubuntu model more than the Vista model? grrr.

    1. Re:Linux Cost More? by setagllib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Linux install is not subsidized with hundreds of badvertisement and spyware programs. You get a fixed, enhanced, tested Ubuntu 7.10 without any malware. To many people that's worth a lot more than Vista. Personally? I'd get the cheap Vista license and then replace the install with Ubuntu anyway, and then perform a ritual sacrifice to help a copy of Vista leave this world.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
  16. Ubuntu PowerPCs by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 1

    The PPC zealot in me first read the headline as "Ubuntu 7.10 PowerPCs."

    --
    Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
  17. Too much unregistered shareware by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish they cost less than a comparable windows system. They're acting like they are giving you a free OS, when they're really getting more money off of the Linux machines. Major publishers of shareware pay home PC builders to get the unregistered versions of their products installed on the system before the end user first turns it on. Some Slashdot users have hypothesized that this makes up for the entire price of a high-volume OEM Windows license. The reason you don't get a discount on the PC with Ubuntu OS is that the shareware either isn't available for GNU/Linux (and doesn't run well in Wine) or has a Free counterpart that's as good or better.
  18. Dell PCs probably don't use LinuxBIOS by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So it still needs proprietary drivers, right? Virtually any Dell PC you buy will come with proprietary software on it. After you turn on your Dell PC, a piece of proprietary software called "BIOS" sets the video adapter and much of the rest of the chipset into a known state, does some checks on your RAM, and loads GRUB.
  19. Adhesion contracts by tepples · · Score: 1

    I can't think of many end users that would AGREE to have their control taken from them. Movie with loss of control, or no movie at all. What would most residential end users prefer?

    I'd also be willing to bet that if asked "Would you like to let the movie studio control what you watch on your legally purchased DVD, or would YOU like to choose?" darn near 100% of the users would indicate the latter. "Would you like to let the movie studio control what you watch on your legally purchased DVD, and in return have a wide selection of titles? Or would YOU like to choose and have only obscure films you've never heard of from countries you'll probably never visit?"
    1. Re:Adhesion contracts by WK2 · · Score: 1

      I can't think of many end users that would AGREE to have their control taken from them.
      Movie with loss of control, or no movie at all. What would most residential end users prefer?

      So if UOP became illegal, or for some reason impossible, or too difficult, then all of a sudden all of the movie producers will just pack up and go home and never create another movie again? I don't think so.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    2. Re:Adhesion contracts by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Movie with loss of control, or no movie at all.

      What complete and utter bullshit. Like they never released any movies on VHS or Laserdisc because there wasn't any way to stop people from seeking.

      Do you seriously believe that the studious would rather stop making movies than releasing them on media where you can skip commercials?

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  20. We'll even toss in a few laptop batteries by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Duck!

    I kid, I kid! Love this move on Dell's part. Get me a laptop with a working built-in webcam and I'm sold. Telecommuter? Naaa, just an expat.

    In unrelated news, there's a Duke Nukem teaser. Is it April 1 already?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  21. Studios release on a format whose DRM they like by tepples · · Score: 1

    So if UOP became illegal, or for some reason impossible, or too difficult, then all of a sudden all of the movie producers will just pack up and go home and never create another movie again?

    FBI warnings reduce the likelihood of an ignorance of fact defense, which could reduce the damages that the copyright owner can collect from convicted[1] infringers. If a publisher cannot give FBI warnings on a given home video format, it might significantly raise the price of titles in that format to compensate for the cost of lost opportunity for damages. And if this increased price is not profitable for a given title, the publisher might just not release it in that format at all, instead choosing to release it on the competing format whose digital restrictions management capabilities more closely match the publisher's wishes. You already see this with some studios exclusively releasing on HD DVD and others on Blu-ray Disc.

    [1] If "convicted" applies only to criminal law, what corresponding adjective from civil law meaning "successfully found liable" best replaces it in context?

    1. Re:Studios release on a format whose DRM they like by WK2 · · Score: 1

      FBI warnings reduce the likelihood of an ignorance of fact defense, which could reduce the damages that the copyright owner can collect from convicted[1] infringers. If a publisher cannot give FBI warnings on a given home video format, it might significantly raise the price of titles in that format to compensate for the cost of lost opportunity for damages.

      1) there is no reason the movie company can't display the FBI warning anyway.
      2) Everybody has seen the FBI warning. Most hundreds, maybe even thousands of times. That is why we skip it. Seen it already. The judge or jury would never believe they hadn't seen it.
      3) The movie studios don't even go after people who share their DVDs, etc with friends. They would like to, but there is just no way. They don't get any damages for court cases they don't even persue.
      4) The FBI warning has nothing to do with fact. It claims you can't do this or that under any circumstances. Which is simply not true.
      5) UOP isn't used for FBI warnings. It is used for commercials. If it was just for the warnings, it would have been done differently.

      You already see this with some studios exclusively releasing on HD DVD and others on Blu-ray Disc.

      Both HD-DVD and Blu-ray support UOP. They have nothing to do with this thread. The exclusivity is due to multi-million dollar agreements, not because they prefer one or the other.
      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    2. Re:Studios release on a format whose DRM they like by tepples · · Score: 1

      5) UOP isn't used for FBI warnings. It is used for commercials. Your Honor, if we weren't able to force viewing of the commercials, our advertisers would not pay us as much, and selling these discs at this price would be unprofitable.

      Both HD-DVD and Blu-ray support UOP. Because they don't want movie studios defecting en masse to the other format.
    3. Re:Studios release on a format whose DRM they like by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      The annoying thing is they insist on showing (localized) copyright notices even in locales where ignorance of the law is not a valid defense. Besides that, skipping it means you have seen it at least once, as otherwise you wouldn't be wanting to skip it.

  22. DVD Prayback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If they're smart, they'll continue on that path and add out-of-the-box support for mp3, aac, and other non-Free multimedia."

    What do you mean? Non-free?

  23. VHS was tape. There's a difference. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Like they never released any movies on VHS or Laserdisc because there wasn't any way to stop people from seeking. VHS and other tape media never had random access, only fast play. Laserdisc already commanded a premium price that DVD generally does not match, especially after correcting for the increase in nationwide wages since the Laserdisc era.
  24. You're still off the mark by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

    According to whom?

    According to the people who came up with the DVD format.

    I'd also be willing to bet that if asked "Would you like to let the movie studio control what you watch on your legally purchased DVD, or would YOU like to choose?" darn near 100% of the users would indicate the latter.

    I'd be willing to bet that if asked "Would you rather go work and earn $100, or would you like to have it for free from UncleTogie's personal bank account?" darn near 100% of the people would indicate the latter. Majority rule is completely irrelevant in some cases, such as what the DVD specifications say.

    If you check the linked article above, pay close attention to the last sentence in the first paragraph. Wonton abuse of a published spec is one of the first steps to render said spec obsolete.

    I read it, and I saw the last sentence. Here it is for reference: "Some publishers run protected commercials on their DVDs, which is widely seen as an abuse of the feature." I don't disagree, and I also see it as an abuse of the feature. Maybe the spec is obsolete. That still doesn't change the fact that according to the specification, players that ignore PUOs are not working correctly. They may be broken in a way that is convenient to you, and you might like the way in which they're broken a lot, and I would never argue that you shouldn't use a player that works how you want it to.

    But acting like DVD players that work according to the specification are broken only masks the real problems: companies that force you to watch stuff you don't want to because of greed, and maybe a specification that has parts in it that allows such companies to engage in such abuse, although there ARE valid uses of PUOs (some of which are also outlined in the Wikipedia article). Whining and complaining about the DVD players is pointless.

    Wonton abuse of a published spec is one of the first steps to render said spec obsolete.

    Actually, not buying DVDs that abuse the practice is the first step to make the situation better. If you get a DVD home and are forced to watch a crapfest of commercials, return it to the store and explain why. If companies start seeing an impact in their bottom line because of their abuse, they'll stop. If you keep buying DVDs from them and working around the PUOs, their profits will continue to go up, their abuse will appear to be profitable, and it will encourage even more abuse.

    1. Re:You're still off the mark by Gunstick · · Score: 1

      on the Web we had popup blockers, on DVD players we have commercial skippers.

      It's all the same. Industry abuses their own specs so they get abused back from the consumers.

      --
      Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
  25. Dell seems to have started well by leftcase · · Score: 1

    According to 'El Reg, Dell has sold around 40,000 Ubuntu powered PCs. To be fair, that's not too bad for an operating system that isn't Windows or Mac....

    Dell isn't a dumb company, if they're investing time and money in improving Ubuntu and making it more appealing to the user I guess they must think it can make them money.