IBM Jazz Edges Closer To Open Source
hhavensteincw writes "IBM is molding its Jazz technology, which helps software development teams collaborate, in the image of its popular Eclipse open source community. IBM said that today's move to open access to its Jazz.net portal to anyone to peruse its code, access bug lists, etc. puts it on the path to completely open-source the Jazz technology."
...when Jazz vertices and faces are also close to Open Source.
I love when I can actually RTFA and still have no idea what the product is. So I found these videos of Jazz which should be helpful. But this is one of those "platform" things where they aren't actually selling anything... But my interpretation is that they're essentially trying to put together a code repository (ala Subversion) with Bugtraq with mailing list with instant message.
--
Educational microcontroller kits for the digital generation.
I miss the "love the ponies" troll.. please return.. we are sorry little pony...
9 out of 10 taggers agree, /. articles are simply omens of our impending doom
I guess no news really is good news to most of us?
That the word "Jazz" comes from creole sexual slang "come jazz me up".
It is also past tense form of "jizz".
How times change...
Most of us haven't heard of it because it has been in a closed private pilot program, now open to all of us.
OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
He's on the jazz man, on the jazz...
It's good to see that Wall Street is starting to take notice of the value of open source. IBM's stock was up over 5 points Monday on this latest news of their ever-increasing commitment to open source software rather than the closed source models of the 20th century.
Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
OMG PONIES!!!
i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
My brother has inquired about the details of this expirement as he may be interested in participating. The experiment administrator told him that the work must be completed on the selected computers in the CS labs as those boxes would be the only place the software is available.
The only thing I could think of when I read this article, was: "IBM is on the jazz again."
80 CC D8 AF AE D3 AB 54 B7 2E CE 67 C7
I saw a demo once. In a nutshell, Jazz is to team performance what Eclipse is to personal performance, it is a platform for collaboration tools. I think it started as an internal project of eclipse developers to better support the Eclipse development process. You can define and enforce your software process and good coding practices. A software process can be a heavyweight pocess a la RUP or a lightweight like XP or any custom process like the Eclipse Process. There are development process building blocks like plans, tasks, roles, versions, (nightly) builds, milestones, releases, bugs, etc.. It supports distributed (multi site) development. It has an embededd chat capablity that is process aware (e.g. drag and drop of references to bug reports, builds and code deltas). There is also a "dashboard" web application with project status screens and bug tracking.
is IBM Jazz released on the Big Blue Note label?
One swallow does not a fellatrix make
Given the tripe that "Rational" products are, this makes my curiosity about this ZERO.
There are several good collaboration tools out there, none made by "Rational"
how long until
On Slashdot, nobody knows what the jazz is all about, y'see!
It's GPL; I'm going to create my own BSDL version called "Free Jazz" - beautiful chaos allowing free improvisation :)
Jazz is the sound of a blues quartet being pushed down the stairs.
I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
since you appear to know what a frosty piss taste like, I am guessing that you are a window's developer.
I like turtles!
It's a simple matter of complex programming.
The
Oh joy. Another poorly written app is being dumped into the FOSS domain in a lame attempt to get some fool to try fixing the bugs (See: Netscape or Java).
I'd ask why the FOSS community doesn't just come up with their own solutions... but that's like asking a committee to solve all the world's problems. Been there and done that for over 200 years, it doesn't prove viable.
As much as people hate them, you need a monopolistic tyrant like Microsoft or Apple to get anything accomplished. Think of change as dragging a carpet- the bigger the carpet gets, the bigger the person pulling it has to be in order to create any change.
But then you have companies like Sun, IBM, etc living on past glories and thinking it will just magically "be their turn" again, rather than going out and making something people want. And a lot of that is because their culture is one with lots of people involved, they probably have a ratio of like 4 vice presidents per engineer, etc. And let's not even talk about the goofiness of the upper management, the golden/platinum parachutes, etc. There's no incentive to succeed... so they don't. It's not hard to figure out.
And that's why FOSS fails so hard. There's no incentive for success. You aren't going to have "the next Bill Gates" be some guy who writes FOSS, unless he's capable of billing a few billions of hours per year. Even the best Lunix consultant can't double-dip his billable hours THAT much (although it's definitely not for lack of trying).
So, sadly, all FOSS is good for is trying to polish the turds big corporate failures dump (both literally and figuratively) on their laps.
Quote, with own emphasis: