Slashdot Mirror


Atheros Hardware Abstraction Layer Source Is Released

chrb writes "With the recent discussion here on proprietary blobs in the Linux kernel, it's nice to see that today Sam Leffler has released the source for the Atheros Hardware Abstraction Layer under the ISC license, which is both GPL and BSD compatible. The Atheros chipset is used in many laptops, so this is another important step towards running a completely free distribution."

117 comments

  1. YAY by iamwhoiamtoday · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a Macbook from just over a year ago, and it uses a Atheros wireless card, and it's the biggest pain to get running in Linux. Hopefully, with the Source released, it will be easier in the future to get the wireless working on this model of computer.

    1. Re:YAY by porl · · Score: 1

      i have a similar issue. it usually works on mine (first gen intel macbook pro) and i am in fact using it now, but often it won't connect properly and i get the syslog fill with 'calibration' errors. hopefully this will help with that :)

    2. Re:YAY by ch0ad · · Score: 1

      i have a samsung nc1 netbook with a "AR242x 802.11abg" wireless chipset. currently i have to compile the drivers for it to get it to work... does this mean in subsequent releases of the kernel that it will just work?

    3. Re:YAY by noundi · · Score: 1

      Cutting your leg off with a chainsaw is the biggest pain. Compiling the hal source and reboot your machine is just annoying.

      --
      I am the lawn!
  2. Interesting by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is interesting, as there are three Atheros drivers, all different. Madwifi uses the HAL. Ath5 is in the Linux trunk and doesn't (I think). Ath9 was developed by Atheros and probably uses the HAL but I didn't check. Sam was mostly interested in this because he wanted to work on mesh networking - it's good to see he's still involved.

    The argument about BLOBs - binary loadable objects in the kernel - is not new, despite Bruce Byfield's recent report. I guess he just doesn't read the kernel list and other distro internal discussions, where this has been going on for a decade. And FSF did not "redefine" anything, they've always held that opinion.

    It would be nice to draw a line at the hardware bus, with all above that Open Source and all below that whatever the hardware manufacturer likes because we don't deal with it. But BLOBs break that, because they are both above and below the bus. If we're going to handle the code, we can't really deny that there's a computer there running closed-source code. And given the degree to which wifi firmware sucks the world would be nicer if it was Free Software. Now, we just have to drive some sense into FCC, etc.

    Bruce

    1. Re:Interesting by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually ath9k is fully open source by Atheros.
      http://mobile.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/26/2138228
      No firmware, no HAL, nothing.

      I've bought two of the cards to support Atheros even though the drivers arent 100% just yet.
      I also have a older b/g card which works superbly.

    2. Re:Interesting by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a new Acer Aspire One, with Atheros wireless, and have mostly got it running Debian properly - the biggest bugs I'm seeing may be in Debian Lenny rather than anything about Aspire One. A nice thing about this HAL release is that it makes Sam's virtual WAP software unquestionably Free - even from the BSD perspective. Did you ever want to connect to all of the WAPs you can reach at once, and be two or three different WAPs for others at the same time, all without carrying extra hardware? Sam's code can do that.

      Being someone who speaks publicly about Open Source, I want to be seen using 100% Open Source. If you're going to talk the talk, you should walk the walk too.

    3. Re:Interesting by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 1

      Its good to see someone practising what they preach! Bravo

    4. Re:Interesting by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is interesting, as there are three Atheros drivers, all different. Madwifi uses the HAL. Ath5 is in the Linux trunk and doesn't (I think). Ath9 was developed by Atheros and probably uses the HAL but I didn't check.

      I dont quite get the point of this then TBH, i mean it is nice to open source their code, but given that it has pretty much been reverse engineered already, isn't it a bit late!?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    5. Re:Interesting by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Did you ever want to connect to all of the WAPs you can reach at once, and be two or three different WAPs for others at the same time, all without carrying extra hardware? Sam's code can do that.

      This is something that I never knew was possible.
      Thanks for spreading this knowledge!

    6. Re:Interesting by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

      i mean it is nice to open source their code, but given that it has pretty much been reverse engineered already, isn't it a bit late!?

      Especially since the kernel developers aren't going to let anything with a HAL into Linus' tree, entirely for architectural reasons. But it makes the best version of the driver at the moment fully free.

    7. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BLOBs - binary loadable objects

      Idiot.

    8. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got an A5007 and the ath9k driver still doesn't work with it and I'm still forced to recompile the "hacked" MadWifi driver-with-special-HAL driver every time I install a new kernel.

    9. Re:Interesting by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have an Aspire One as well. Mine is running FreeBSD, with wireless networking via the ath_hal kernel module.

      I had to recompile the kernel using the latest 7.1 source snapshot to get the Atheros card working. The link/activity light doesn't work (no big deal, really!), but the wireless connection 'kill switch' on the front of the case works. I haven't tried running it as a WAP yet, but now I want to give it a try! The ath kernel modules in BSD have supported AP mode for some time now; if it doesn't work that way, I may look into porting Sam's code.

      --
      When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
    10. Re:Interesting by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2, Funny

      BLOBs - binary loadable objects

      Idiot.

      Instrumentation Digital On-Line Transcriber ? Really, you should have been more creative. How about,

      Blathering Retard Uttering Crass Euphemisms -- Probably Expects Responding Erudite Nameless Slashdotters

      Now that sounds like a foolish person ;)

      (with apologies to B.P.)

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    11. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus kernel devs can evaluate the code and maybe make the in-kernel driver better...

    12. Re:Interesting by el+americano · · Score: 1

      I dont quite get the point of this then TBH, i mean it is nice to open source their code, but given that it has pretty much been reverse engineered already, isn't it a bit late!?

      Full feature support
      Support for more chip revisions
      Manufacturer supported testing and debugging

      I'm speaking in general here, since I don't know if the reverse engineered version supported 11n, was stable, and offered high performance, but wireless is one area where I would much rather use a driver developed with full knowledge of the hardware. Also, if an official version attracts more users under the same driver, that will also have OSS benefits.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
  3. Sweet by bsharp8256 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I didn't see this coming, although I have to say I don't keep up with MadWifi news anymore since they fixed 64-bit support for the AR5007 chipset...

  4. Working sleep mode? by Picass0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean the sleep function will finally work as it should without draining the batteries? I have yet to see a laptop running Linux go into hibernate mode and not bleed off the batteries.

    1. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you can prove that it bleeds off the batteries more than Linux, we would like to see numbers, please. Linux isn't in charge once the machine is asleep. It would mean that some device is left in a power-drawing mode. I can't say for sure that Atheros has anything to do with this. Are you confusing it with the other HAL on Linux systems?

    2. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oops, I meant to say "more than windows", of course.

    3. Re:Working sleep mode? by ristretto_dreams · · Score: 4, Informative

      ermm, I think the problem here is that the OP is referring to two different things, "sleep" and "hibernate", but unless I am incorrectly remembering my ACPI (which is quite possible), Linux is in fact, if not "in charge once the machine is alseep", at least in charge of correctly putting all various pieces of the system into S3 sleep mode correctly. I know that for a long time my Thinkpad had powerdrain problems in S3 because of incorrectly suspended wifi. For hibernate mode (assuming true write to disk and power off), then of course Linux isn't in charge.

    4. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I guess the OSPM could leave the wireless interface in a power-draining state.

    5. Re:Working sleep mode? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      No, open sourcing this means nothing much and I doubt that now it's open source any part of the code will be changed because it's firmware.

    6. Re:Working sleep mode? by spazdor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It means that community developers will be able to write a driver that works as well in any OS as the Windows one, in every way.

      It means all those Linux netbooks that were sold with cheap Aths, will soon have completely robust, standards-compliant wireless. And all those sniffing network-trickery programs that the haxors love, will Just Work(tm). And development can proceed with mesh networking on a much wider scope.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    7. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Slashdot article was confusing, and I didn't help. Sorry. It's not firmware in this case.

    8. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right now, there is a larger team working on madwifi than just Sam, and the kernel team is working on ath5, so I don't think you're right this time.

      There is another reason to expect this to result in a code improvement. The same netbooks that have the Atheros wifi often have Intel 3D as part of the chipset. Intel 3D is known to be horrible on Windows. Part of the problem is that desktop vendors don't want Intel 3D to be good, because they want to sell graphics cards. So, Intel has little incentive to make it better.

      Except under X, that is. As far as I can tell, it works great under X. The X team at Intel is either not bothered with marketing hold-back; or because the source is public or satisfies a server market, they can justify a need for quality.

      ATI will improve over time, and they will probably drive most of it themselves. Open Source will help them do that.

      Bruce

    9. Re:Working sleep mode? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      WTF! i mean WTF!!! how did this get modded insightful? Any Linux system that is properly configured can hibernate there is no need for any hardware support for hibernate to work, all dodge drivers can just be unloaded reloaded!

      Now if you meant suspend to ram, well madwifi has never given my system any problems when suspending to ram but this does (in theory) mean that the developers can delve deeper into the code should there be any.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    10. Re:Working sleep mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well considering it stores memory into a file then turns off when a machine hibernates under Linux (at least under all of my experiences with making Linux hibernate on laptops) then I find it pretty much impossible to do that...
      Now sleep on the other hand, yeah.

    11. Re:Working sleep mode? by andyn · · Score: 1

      Draining batteries only while in sleep? Luxury! My old Fujitsu L1300 will drain its batteries in a day even when it has been completely shut down. Removing the battery makes it last for weeks.

    12. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, i wonder if anyone has done any benchmarks with intel graphics comparing linux/windows/osx?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    13. Re:Working sleep mode? by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      The only time i've seen intels integrated chips neglect to tear the screen when things move is under OS X, it does it in Vista, and has done it in X under Linux for as long as i've had the machine.

      I think this has more to do with the windowing system or perhaps the drivers integration with that windowing system than the hardware though.

      For 3D the 945gms are acceptable in a few games for casual stuff, i've even played GTA san andreas on mine a few times.

    14. Re:Working sleep mode? by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hi, I joined X.org after ATI released docs, and helped add support for an entire line of video cards, including the one I'm using right now to type this.

      Your defeatism is kinda silly, if you stop and consider how much work we've done in the open source world.

      --
      ~ C.
    15. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      Isn't OS X using X? I'd assume it's the same Intel driver.

      Tears the screen... you mean the monitor loses horizontal sync?

    16. Re:Working sleep mode? by lakeland · · Score: 1

      No, OSX doesn't use X, although X is easily installable.

    17. Re:Working sleep mode? by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      OS X uses something they developed specifically to avoid using X11 :D There is a comment here on slashdot from a few years back about why, the guy who was involved in developing it had a LONG list of reasons.

      By tearing i mean, move a window, watch a video, anything that moves across the screen tears. Basically if you move a window, it should remain solid and not move across the screen in segments etc.

    18. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      It's probably failing to render the entire movement in a frame, then. I'll try to make that happen with mine. On Intel architecture, the thing that most often slows down that chipset is insufficient availability of MTRRs. That has halved the render speed on my desktop when it happens. Look in /proc/mtrr on Linux when X isn't started, if 8 are already used, there's a problem. This is actually happening on my Aspire One, and there seems to be redundant use of the MTRRs. I enabled the kernel MTRR cleaner, but don't have it working yet.

      This may no longer be a problem if X can use PAT, the modern replacement for MTRRs. But I'm not sure it does.

    19. Re:Working sleep mode? by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      The only time i've seen intels integrated chips neglect to tear the screen when things move is under OS X, it does it in Vista, and has done it in X under Linux for as long as i've had the machine.

      I have Linux running on an Intel 950 running Compiz and the only screen tearing that ever happens is when I try to run Blender, which is a known Compiz issue. Other than that it's rock solid.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    20. Re:Working sleep mode? by omuls+are+tasty · · Score: 1

      Really? I was under the impression that the Intel video drivers (either the X or the kernel ones, don't know which) kinda suck? I know I always get complaints for missing GL extensions with my 945GM.

    21. Re:Working sleep mode? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      What GL extensions are you missing? I haven't seen this.

    22. Re:Working sleep mode? by omuls+are+tasty · · Score: 1

      Off the top of my head, I think it was texture_from_pixmap. Most programs using 3d wouldn't work unless I set LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT, which reverts to indirect rendering. Compiz wouldn't work, nor would 3d games under wine (they work after setting the parameter, but painfully slow)

  5. DVD and Blu-ray by NinthAgendaDotCom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Cool. Now we need free DVD and Blu-ray decryption. That always made me feel funny when I would try Linux. Totally free OS... but if you want to watch DVDs, you download an illegal DVD decrypter. (I know there are legal ones you can pay for.)

    --
    -- http://ninthagenda.com/
    1. Re:DVD and Blu-ray by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      One was code that a company always had the right to release. The will take repeal of misguided law.

    2. Re:DVD and Blu-ray by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      I doubt this will happen. Even mp3 decoders aren't free yet AFAIK and I'm not sure about DVD in terms of relative age, but Blu-ray is a much newer format, way in its infancy in fact. It was engineered specifically with DRM in mind, something that was never thought much of in the Linux community. And when you consider how much money went into making Blu-ray the dominant format over HD DVD, you'd think that they would try to make a little profit from the codecs now that they've won. Ah, how great it is to be king.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    3. Re:DVD and Blu-ray by LingNoi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the UK this stuff is patent free because there are no software patents in England. It depends very much on where you live.

      If Canonical made a UK distribution which included all the patented free software it would also create prior art in case of any changes in UK patent law.

    4. Re:DVD and Blu-ray by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Patent Free and Copyright Free are not the same.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    5. Re:DVD and Blu-ray by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      duh.. Hence why I said patented free software..

  6. Improved HAL by rrossman2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed this on the dd-wrt.com website a couple of months back (dated 8.28.08) We would like to announce the release of a new HAL for Atheros WLAN devices. The new HAL is the result of a collaboration between OpenWrt.org, DD-WRT and MakSat Technologies (P) Ltd. It is the first result of a common effort, and the present collaborators would like to share the product of this work. It is the intention to provide reliable and continued support for other projects using this new HAL for Atheros WLAN devices. The HAL provides a defined API to access and contol Atheros WLAN chipsets, and is an integral part for many drivers such as MadWifi. Comparing it with the HAL that's currently used by MadWifi, the most important changes are: * many known bugs have been fixed * improved noise immunity measures * added support for additional architectures, such as ARM11, MIPS64 and MIPS32r2 * enhanced support for Atheros WiSOC (Wireless System on Chip) * added support for Atheros AR7100 Home of the new HAL will be the website of the madwifi.org project, http://madwifi.org./ Future development will be coordinated here, and the bug tracking facility can be used to report bugs or file feature requests. For commercial requests please contact hal@maksat.deThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it . So with the new news maybe things will really get rolling

    1. Re:Improved HAL by rrossman2 · · Score: 0

      Eh, maybe the formatting got screwed up so it's all crushed, but how is that being a troll? If you combine both the opening by Atheros plus the work the OpenWRT, DD-WRT, and MakSat Technologies on the HAL for Atheros WLAN devices, maybe support plus s extra feature will come about quickly for both dd-wrt and other router firmware, as well as the main linux kernel for laptops, etc. Here's another user that sees the benefits: "I wonder if this could be used to help port OpenWRT over to the atheros chipset. Currently the only routers that OpenWRT (and conversely by that DD-WRT) really work well on are the broadcom chipsets. Many routers that use the Atheros chipset have been written off as impossible to port to. Maybe they could be used if this proves any insight to how they operate."

    2. Re:Improved HAL by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      It was probably modded troll because you posted a spam-protected email in plain text without thinking.

  7. Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by e9th · · Score: 1

    OpenBSD likes the ISC license. deRaadt was a bit unhappy with the old arrangement.

    1. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by e9th · · Score: 1

      So Reyk had the code before Leffler?

    2. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by PenGun · · Score: 1

      One O two Ls and you don't have to wear it ... eh'.

    3. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. If you remove someone else's name and add your own, that's plagiarism, not theft.
      2. If you remove someone else's license, and the license doesn't give you permission to do that, that's copyright infringement, not theft.
      3. If you add a new license and list yourself as an author, and the old license didn't give you permission to do that, that's copyright infringement, not theft.
      4. If you don't enforce your copyright, that's nothing. Copyright gives you the right to sue, if you punt, that's your choice, stop moaning.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by the_B0fh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Very good. You can go take the bar exam. Meanwhile, in the real world, English is my fourth language. I'm a simple man using simple words.

      So, just to double check with you - do you support or do you not support what the madwifi fuckers did with Reyk's code - specifically the reverse engineered bits?

    5. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      If English is your fourth language then I'm sure you won't mind being corrected from time to time. Using the word theft here to describe intellectual property is kind of a hot-button issue; there may not be a distinction to the common man, but there is a legal distinction which people take very seriously here. I'm not defending anyone here for coming down on you like that, but a poor choice of words here is likely to draw that kind of response.

      Since Mr. Reyk hasn't filed suit, it's totally academic what the 'madwifi fuckers' did or did not do. If you have an axe to grind, take it up with them.

      If, alternately, you have a thoughtful and reasoned criticism (and preferably some strong evidence for your allegations), please share it.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    6. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by the_B0fh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since Mr. Reyk hasn't filed suit, it's totally academic what the 'madwifi fuckers' did or did not do.

      For someone who make such strong claims on being intellectually correct, this is an interesting position to take. So, in your world, as long as no suit is filed, any action taken is just "totally academic"?

      If you have an axe to grind, take it up with them.

      I don't really have an axe to grind. It's just two people in the madwifi group that did that "totally academic" but unethical thing. And have not apologized for it.

      If, alternately, you have a thoughtful and reasoned criticism (and preferably some strong evidence for your allegations), please share it.

      Umm... you did not manage to follow the original link that I had originally responded to? Would you like a signed and sealed piece of paper? Go read the link again - note that Theo was talking about the OpenHAL code. http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2007/9/13/259448/thread

      If you want to look for evidence, you can find it yourself. OpenBSD's CVS is open. I'm sure madwifi's repository is available too. Look at code check in dates. Make up your own mind. *big hint* OpenBSD's OpenHAL is dated a year earlier, according to 3rd party reports. Please do not let this *big hint* color your perception or conclusion. KTHXHAND

    7. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by the_B0fh · · Score: 0, Troll

      To all the stupid mods, the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    8. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I support your right to be a cunt.

    9. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      They made something new from something old. I, personally, don't give a shit about the legal issues, or the ego issues.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      Go read the link again - note that Theo was talking about the OpenHAL code. http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2007/9/13/259448/thread

      OK, I read the entire thread. As I did so, I realized that it looked familar. I think that I read the whole thing a year ago in response to an earlier posting here. It struck me then as a tempest in a teapot. It still does.

      Since Mr. Reyk hasn't filed suit, it's totally academic what the 'madwifi fuckers' did or did not do.

      In other words, if a copyright owner chooses not to bring a lawsuit, no one else can bring one on his/her behalf. So yes, any discussion of what happened is academic, just like discussions about Lori Drew or Hans Reiser. You can discuss and argue all that you want, but nothing you say will have any legal standing. Maybe, if enough people scream about something, you can encourage a prosecutor to look into something (as apparently happened with Lori Drew), but since copyright cases are civil suits, not criminal cases, I don't see you making much headway there. I don't know why Mr. Reyk hasn't filed a suit. Maybe he's lazy. Maybe he and the accused have a private understanding that we know nothing about. Who knows? I don't know and I don't care.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    11. Re:Well, this should brighten up Theo's day... by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      OK, I read the entire thread. As I did so, I realized that it looked familar. I think that I read the whole thing a year ago in response to an earlier posting here. It struck me then as a tempest in a teapot. It still does.

      Of course. It's not the end of the free world. However, in the Free Software world, or in the Open Source world, people who are supposed to give a shit about principles, apparently do not. And couldn't understand why other people feel pissed off.

      And who the fuck's talking about legal standing? For some reason, you seem to live in the world where the only thing that matters is a lawsuit.

  8. OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by tecker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if this could be used to help port OpenWRT over to the atheros chipset. Currently the only routers that OpenWRT (and conversely by that DD-WRT) really work well on are the broadcom chipsets. Many routers that use the Atheros chipset have been written off as impossible to port to. Maybe they could be used if this proves any insight to how they operate.

    --
    Procrastinating life a way at a rapid rate of speed.
    1. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Now that's just not right. OpenWrt works well with Atheros chips...

    2. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Thats odd because all the Atheros chips are very open, and I think this is was the last bit that was closed.
      I dont think there is anything left that is closed.

    3. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by belial · · Score: 3, Informative

      When is the last time you've looked at this? The Nanostations, which are atheros based can run OpenWRT, DDWrt, etc. The big thing I see here is that with OSS HAL, maybe adhoc support on atheros will get better. Meraki, FON, and the ACCTON (openmesh.com) routers are all atheros too.

    4. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by camh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Atheros-based access points do work with OpenWRT. It works better than Broadcom-based devices. I replaced a Broadcom-based device with an Atheros-based one so it would work better, and run with the Linux 2.6 kernel. Only very recently has OpenWRT been able to run a 2.6 kernel with Broadcom-based wifi because the open drivers are getting up to scratch, and even then some things still dont work as well as Atheros wifi.
      The Atheros wifi on OpenWRT uses the madwifi driver, so this opening up of the HAL will still benefit OpenWRT in allowing even more sophisticated use of wifi.

    5. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the flip side of that coin, why is it that Broadcom chipsets work great on OpenWRT and DD-WRT (both of which are Linux based), yet Broadcom drivers for an average Linux distro are shit?

    6. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      Not really. My Fonera 2100 uses Atheros chipsets and DD-WRT works really well on it. It even supports Super-G mode on the Atheros chip.

    7. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my wrt54g v7 then sir. It has been gathering dust ever since the day I purchased it thinking it'd work with 3rd party firmware.

    8. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by klapaucjusz · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this could be used to help port OpenWRT over to the atheros chipset. Currently the only routers that OpenWRT (and conversely by that DD-WRT) really work well on are the broadcom chipsets.

      Just the opposite. Broadcom-based routers work, but they use a binary driver and hence they are stuck with a 2.4 kernel. Which makes them unusable for those of us trying e.g. to build IPv6 firewalls.

      The Atheros-based routers, on the other hand, are rock solid under 2.6.25. I'm running 10 of those in an experimental mesh network.

    9. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by steve_song · · Score: 1
    10. Re:OpenWRT and DD-WRT porting boosted by this? by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

      the v7 problem is likely tied to the horribly low 2MB FLASH, 8MB RAM compared to the earlier versions of the router.

      dd-wrt is indeed supported on many ath systems, I suggest you search the term "redboot"

  9. QA by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    What if it is not just about running a completely free distro, but also about running a completely functional one? The WiFi hardware in my notebook fails to work for a mysterious reason and a certain transparency of hardware internals would not hurt when trying to make it work.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:QA by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Erm...What wifi chip are you using?

      The good thing about manufacturers opening their drivers is you get a completely free distro and its fully functional.

  10. Who is Sam Leffler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article apparaently he had "an agreement with Atheros" to "access to information about their devices". Does that mean he developed the HAL with little help from the company? (And apparaently he'll have no more access since the agreement is "concluded".)

    It is nice to have an open source driver released, but it is NOT nice that an individual have to go jump through hoops and write it himself to make it happen.

    1. Re:Who is Sam Leffler? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is nice to have an open source driver released, but it is NOT nice that an individual have to go jump through hoops and write it himself to make it happen.

      That's how a lot of them happen. What's worse is when an individual, or team of individuals, work for years to make some proprietary code unnecessary, all of the time knowing that only when they are done will the manufacturer of the proprietary code place it in Open Source.

    2. Re:Who is Sam Leffler? by Gazzonyx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless you're on the Samba team ;)

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    3. Re:Who is Sam Leffler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or not. That would be the ultimate mindfuck by Microsoft!

  11. Good news; but blob related? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was under the impression that the atheros HAL is not a binary blob in the sense the summary refers to, but a program executed on the host CPU. That makes this even better news than if it were a blob. It is debatable whether or not a system that needs to load a bunch of blobs onto its peripherals at startup is free or not(personally, I'm inclined to say it is, as long as the mechanisms for loading the firmware and interacting with the peripheral are open and the firmware is freely redistributable); but a system with a big binary lump running in kernel space definitely isn't.

    It is very encouraging to see progress towards removing one of the most common causes of tainted kernels(probably second only to video card drivers); but it isn't really related to the blob question.

    1. Re:Good news; but blob related? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was not firmware for downloading into the embedded processor of the wifi device. That came up because of the Bruce Byfield article recently covered here. There are BLOBs that execute on the main CPU, like nVidia's. I'm not sure if this HAL was ever one of those.

  12. Re:Free OS, free movies by Jamie's+Nightmare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because those movies are shit? Your local library has a better selection of Hollywood titles than the site you reference. Most of these have never been in circulation, and for a very good reason.

    Not to mention some of the movies on this site are in formats that are not "free and open" like Linux. AVI, DIVX, MPEG4? Hell, one I looked at was itself a 4 gig ISO file of MPEG2 video. How far must one dig through the site before finding the OGG format videos?

    --
    "When you see a unixer brainwashed beyond saving, kick him out of the door." - Xah Lee
  13. Re:Free OS, free movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because they are open and free doesn't mean they don't suck.

  14. Why are there blobs? by xant · · Score: 1

    Can someone please explain to me what the advantage (presumably to the hw manufacturer) there is by having binary loadable code on the computer? Why not just store it on the hardware? Is the h/w somehow cheaper to manufacture because this is done? I really don't see how that could be.. the things have flash memory already.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:Why are there blobs? by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you make the customer load up the bits, you don't have to do it in the factory.

      If the manufacturers could figure out a way to make the software build the card at install time and still manage to milk the customer of money, they'd do it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Why are there blobs? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Informative

      RAM must be cheaper than ROM. Easier to upgrade the firmware, too.

    3. Re:Why are there blobs? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are confusing blobs with firmware. Firmware is software run by the hardware's processor. It used to be stored in ROM, but ROM is expensive, and if the host has a lot of RAM (which any computer does in comparison to a WiFi card) it's cheaper to just give some of the RAM to the device and let it use that instead. This also has the advantage that it's easier to fix bugs in the firmware - just download a new version, rather than replacing the chip (some old cards had the ROM in a socket for doing this, but it was quite rare for anyone to actually do it).

      This is not firmware, however, it is a blob. The kernel module originally just took commands from a userspace driver and passed them over the bus, much like the DRI modules. Unlike the DRI driver, the HAL was binary-only. It was originally claimed that this was required by the FCC, since with the source code anyone could modify the driver to push the card out of regulatory compliance. It was a far from satisfactory solution, however, since it meant that no one could fix the blob, and it was limited to x86-only.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Why are there blobs? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      There is also the advantage of having less wireless card warranty replacements due to failed firmware upgrades. I imagine this is a source of frustration for both consumer and manufacturer. Kudos to Atheros for doing this ... may I point out that Ralink Technology has been doing this for a number of years now? I have found the Atheros and Ralink chipsets to be equally of good quality. Finally, it's time for Intel to follow suit. They have no competitive edge by keeping their binary blobs. Their stuff must be standards compliant to interoperate with other wireless hardware thereby negating anything really proprietary.

  15. ICS? by gringer · · Score: 1

    What's the ICS license? I think someone may have got their acronyms mixed up... of course, that person may be me.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  16. UK does have software patents by Cato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really wish people would stop repeating this myth that the UK (and Europe) are free of software patents. There many, many software patents here - you just have to write the patent in a certain way that gets around the very weak restrictions. See http://eupat.ffii.org/patents/samples/index.en.html for sample of these patents with summaries, from an anti-patent group.

    1. Re:UK does have software patents by LingNoi · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't say Europe I said the UK.

      because you didn't read it the first time..

      In the UK this stuff is patent free because there are no software patents in England.

      I can't believe you were modded up. What stupid mods.

    2. Re:UK does have software patents by Splab · · Score: 1

      And I really really wish people like you would claim they are valid.

      Yes software patents has been granted all over EU, however, just because it has been granted, doesn't make it valid, it would be thrown out of court if it ever got to that point since as the GP said, they aren't valid (yet).

    3. Re:UK does have software patents by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge the first _ever_ software patent was granted in the UK. See here. Note the last sentence in the abstract - The Specification is confined to a description of the programming method (also disclosed in Specification 1,039,142) which is applicable to any general-purpose digital computer. IANAL, but to me that sounds indeed like patent on the program / algorithm itself. According to Wikipedia, "UKIPO regularly grant patents to inventions that are partly or wholly implemented in software". Their enforceability is another matter though.

    4. Re:UK does have software patents by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      You left out one important fact, that enforceability of patents in the EU is up to each member nation to decide on. This little fact you forgot to mention means that software patents are null and void for the majority of the EU states.

      The sole exceptions seem to be the 52rd state of the US, commonly referred to as the UK and to a lesser degree Germany.

      Still, both German and UK courts are in a great flux regarding the entire software patent issue so the overall state of patents in the EU is that they are more or less a complete waste of money and time for companies to acquire.

      For that reason the PP makes a good point. If Canonical made a European version which ignored the legal minefield currently plaguing the US software market and offered it up to EU citizen with a disclaimer that anyone else may download it at their own peril, then hopefully that would start a debate in the ROW (rest of the world) regarding the damage / benefit balance of software and process patents.

      Unfortunately, politicians have neither the insight nor the time to ponder about hypothetical / abstract situations which means the most efficient way to get through to those people is to *show* them something concrete. When the ROW-politicians see their citizen illegally using a distro variant more capable than what is permitted in the home country, a distro which is legal in other countries btw., they will start pondering why the state of affairs is as it is and the damage the current situation inflicts on their society and economy.

      It will not be an overnight change but it would most likely be another spark in the kindle to get a sober discussion going in nations which have completely capitulated mentally on the issue.

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
  17. If anyone at Atheros is reading this by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to say thanks for creating and supporting such a great product. I've been buying and recommending Atheros based wifi cards for years (for both Windows and Linux applications) specifically because of your fantastic support of open systems. They are rock solid and fast.

    Kudos!

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re:If anyone at Atheros is reading this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And please don't let any money grubbing developer who only cares about money do any more "open source" work for you in the future! Sam stood up at Usenix and told the OpenBSD guys to stop their efforts to reverse-engineer HAL or else there would be no open source support at all. Now they've succeeded and not only is there open source support for Atheros, there's more support for it because now Sam's forced to open source HAL in order to keep the money stream coming in from a formerly proprietary monopoly situation. Sam shouldn't be allowed work on open source software, for any organization.

  18. Nice, but can this be built and dropped in? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    As for existing installs, can it be used as a drop-in replacement for an existing blob hal?

    This should have come a lot earlier, not when it is marked legacy.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  19. Open HALs and a bit of history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sam deserves a huge round of applause for all the work he has put in to wireless drivers and support. The long standing criticism of his work, that it was released as a BLOB, was Atheros' choice, not his. Sam stopped direct involvement in Linux drivers a while back, but continued to release BLOBs for many platforms. His release of the HAL source was accompanied by the announcement that his HAL was no longer the reference. Thanks a Whole Lot, Sam, you sure took a lot of grief that wasn't rightfully yours.

    In the last couple of years,the Madwifi team undertook the initiative to negotiate opening the HAL source. Not long after the Madwifi team took up the task, a rework of the old BSD RE effort was used as a legal jimmy and Atheros agreed to accept that work without legal assault, This became the Ath5k driver. Atheros then did something remarkable, and embraced opening the source to several of it's chip lines. They have hired staff, released the 5112 HAL. Madwifi could no longer be written off as a closed source driver, but no one has made an official release of madwifi with the released HAL, so the label remains valid. Recently Atheros has tweaked their NDA rules to permit the HAL certified folks to work on the open drivers, so progress is apace.

    The entire wireless community owes Sam and the old madwifi hands, like Mike Renzmann a world of thanks, and the new HAL coders like Nick Kossifidis and Felix Fietkau all the help one can.

  20. Not only free as in speech, but hassle free by Britz · · Score: 1

    As a user I found open source to be a lot more hassle free than closed source. Usually it open source is supported better and longer. I can download everything from Debian mirrors. When I used Nvidia I always had to do some additional steps.

  21. Rederiving our movies to Ogg Theora and more by tepples · · Score: 1

    Because those movies are shit?

    Linux was shit once, even compared to Windows NT.

    Not to mention some of the movies on this site are in formats that are not "free and open" like Linux.

    The page I linked contained a link to a page titled Rederiving our movies to Ogg Theora and more.

  22. legacy HAL by yupa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note that atheros already release a "legacy" HAL 2 months ago : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122246623707038&w=2

  23. Just say thank you! by psychosmyth · · Score: 1

    If your are like me and you don't want to buy another card because you are broke and you like to distro hop, then this is a great thing! I do get tired of re-installing M/A and the like just to try it out.

  24. Yippee!! Will KisMAC finally work on MacBooks? by wintermute1974 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really hope the programmers behind KisMAC are reading this thread.

    We MacBook users are really hoping that we can run injections and other advanced features using our built-in network cards now. Until now, all our packets were trash and we couldn't work out the SSID.

    Sad days they have been, but now we have reason to be optimistic!

  25. Another really good idea: change the name! by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Another really good idea would be changing the name. Every time I hear "atheros", I think of atheos, beos, skyos, and then, eventually, remember it's some obscure wifi driver.

    1. Re:Another really good idea: change the name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another really good idea would be changing the name. Every time I hear "atheros", I think of atheos, beos, skyos, and then, eventually, remember it's some obscure wifi driver.

      In fact, Atheros is neither obscure nor a driver.

    2. Re:Another really good idea: change the name! by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks -- I didn't know that was a company. Thought it was a chipset family, to be precise. I still think it sounds too much like an OS though ;)