Slashdot Mirror


NFL's IT Chief Gears Up For His 25th Super Bowl

BobB-nw writes with this excerpt from NetworkWorld: "NFL IT guru David Port claims he doesn't have a favorite football team, but on Sunday he'll be working his 25th Super Bowl. As the league's vice president of information technology, Port and his IT staff are responsible for building a temporary network to support NFL staff and thousands of journalists during Super Bowl week. Port starts preparing for each Super Bowl two years in advance, working with the city and venues where IT operations and media professionals will be based. More intensive planning starts about 11 months before the big game. Port explained that the NFL essentially built a small data center with IBM blade servers at the temporary headquarters in a local Marriott near the Super Bowl site. 'We built out an infrastructure with approximately 300 computers, PCs and laptops, and wired and wireless networks that are used for NFL core operations, for game production and business operations. Much of it is also for media,' Port said." CNet is running a related story about the technology behind the Super Bowl, focusing on some of the visual effects viewers will see, as well as the hardware that makes everything happen.

82 comments

  1. Silly IT boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nerds aren't allowed to participate in sports!

    1. Re:Silly IT boy by andreyvul · · Score: 1

      As I have no mod points, I only say this:
      Go back to /b/.

      --
      proud caffeine whore
  2. Dave is a great guy by Controlio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having personally worked with him on SBXL, I can tell you that Dave is a great guy who knows what he's doing. The level of planning is amazing, not to mention the equipment they travel. They bring their own phone network (refusing to use even brand new state-of-the-art switches the house may own), a ridiculous amount of fiber, have fatter data pipes than some small countries, and are completely flexible to individual needs. It's completely night-and-day from any other sports event (including the World Series, Stanley Cup, and the Final Four).

    He also has a bunch of really cool toys. Between him and the FCC, they can pinpoint an unlicensed RF transmitter within 5 feet in under 3 minutes and have it shut down. And yes, this happens multiple times in each super bowl, usually with foreign media.

    1. Re:Dave is a great guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, guys, we're going to have to cut down our university's science funding, there's football to be played!

      Great idea! Start your own football league and instead of serving the viewers that make it money, cheap out on everything and use the income to pay for science funding.

      I'm sure that with your attitude it'd go really well.

    2. Re:Dave is a great guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, I was going to skip the Super Bowl, but you're making it sound kind of interesting.

    3. Re:Dave is a great guy by Myrcutio · · Score: 1

      so this toy you speak of, what exactly do you call an illegal RF detector?

    4. Re:Dave is a great guy by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      So why not just transmit over the cell network?

    5. Re:Dave is a great guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lack of bandwidth and cost

    6. Re:Dave is a great guy by Leetum · · Score: 3, Informative

      Handheld portable radio, tuned to the frequency in question, and a directional antenna. When signal's stronger, antenna's pointing at the source of the issue. Get two or three people working it, can triangulate the source pretty quickly. A lot of amateur radio operators do this sort of thing for fun, its called a "fox hunt".

    7. Re:Dave is a great guy by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      You obviously do not realize that here in the US most universities would not exist without the income generated by their football(US) teams.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    8. Re:Dave is a great guy by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You obviously do not realize that here in the US most universities would not exist without the income generated by their football(US) teams.

      Actually, most, if not all, college athletic depts. lose money. See "Beer and Circus" or any of the other books on the subject. They use some real creative accounting to hide this.

    9. Re:Dave is a great guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously are an idiot. I could argue in 1939 that the trains wouldn't be running on time in Germany if it weren't for the Nazis, since by your sort of logic we can assume that Nazis are the only being able to make trains run on time, and that if they weren't around to prance around the place in their tight black uniforms, no alternative system would crop up to get trains running on time.

      This is, of course, why there are very few universities outside the USA. The whole European education system is basically fucked because it lacks the funding generated by American football.

      Having said this, I'd rather see an American football stadium in Cambridge than Microsoft "Research".

    10. Re:Dave is a great guy by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Handheld, "body block" is as good or better than a directional antenna. Only one null, and no big things to carry.

      Mobile, you'll have an array and some DSP to get that nice arrow on your dash. Combine two cars or just multiple measurements over time with GPS and you can get the location before you even arrive.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:Dave is a great guy by Dude23 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm sure Dave is a great guy and Dave has a job unlike many of us. As far as the Superbowl and the NFL it sucks! The sport sucks, the media coverage sucks, the sports commentators that never shut up and talk about stupid stuff suck. The amount of money they waste of this whole event sucks. The amount of money dumb ass morons who run, throw and catch the ball sucks! In fact there is nothing about NFL that is good anymore.... hasn't been for a very long time.

    12. Re:Dave is a great guy by gtbritishskull · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am sure that the football programs lose money. They are not intended to fund themselves from ticket sales. But, a lot of alumni come back to the colleges to watch the games. This makes them more connected to the college and more likely to donate money to the college. I do not have a cite, but I remember reading about the correlation between alumni donations and football wins and it was definitely a positive correlation. I don't think that we wouldn't have colleges without football, but they would have to find some other way to get their alumni involved to get them to donate or raise tuition.

    13. Re:Dave is a great guy by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      The books might show that they lose money, but if you look at what it costs to be allowed to buy a ticket at some schools, this is far from the truth. The minimum 'donation' for my father's football tickets comes to about 300 a game. These are 30 dollar tickets. (Which he scalped for 600 a piece _).

      On the other hand, this is a very successful athletic program, so its possible your claim that most (but not all) schools lose money is true.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    14. Re:Dave is a great guy by bru_master · · Score: 2, Informative

      I Worked for Dave and crew at the last Superbowl in Phoenix. I was the wireless vendor that the Superbowl hired for the outdoor wireless. Everything that Controlio says is true. He is a great guy, they have there act together and he is a good man to work for. He led the entire site from weeks before to the week after. Three weeks later I received a hand written thank you card and a gift from Dave. In a world of thankless days, I have kept the thank you note on my desk from Dave Port, He seems to have this game plan down.
      I guarantee he did not watch any of the game tonight, he was running the show. Next week he will sleep!!

    15. Re:Dave is a great guy by vishbar · · Score: 1

      And YOU don't realize that the funding generated from the football teams stays within the athletic department of the college. It doesn't go outside to the rest of the school...

      --
      Ride the skies
    16. Re:Dave is a great guy by finster-baby · · Score: 0

      I have not worked with Dave so can't judge the veracity of the great guy assertion, but I did want to point out that he knows 2 years in advance where the Super Bowl will be held. The Stanley Cup and World Series happen in 2 cities with less than one week's notice where they will be held. Also there is often a necessity to travel back and forth across an international border.

      I recognize that the Super Bowl is the granddaddy of all sporting events but a direct comparison with the other 2 events is apples to oranges.

    17. Re:Dave is a great guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you suck

  3. Color me unimpressed by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    It takes him two years? Wow. Not.

    MLB does this with just a few days of notice for the Division and League playoffs and a week or so for the Series.

    1. Re:Color me unimpressed by Kaleo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The SB is the most watched entertainment even in the US. Every year. And you want to compare it with MLB? What a joke. Color me unimpressed.

    2. Re:Color me unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even" in the US? Try *only* in the US. I'd bet the earliest World Cup matches beat the Superbowl in worldwide audience.

    3. Re:Color me unimpressed by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 0, Troll

      Looks like in the U.S. nobody ready embrace the true g33k sport yet.

      The MLS Cup, U.S. Open Cup, CONCACAF Champions League, UEFA Champions League, UEFA EURO, and FIFA World Cup deserve far more greater respect.

    4. Re:Color me unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant evenT

    5. Re:Color me unimpressed by Kaleo · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

    6. Re:Color me unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you aside from the MLS cup.

    7. Re:Color me unimpressed by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Doesn't change the facts, no matter how you spin it. He takes two years, MLB does it multiple times in the span of six weeks. No matter how many people watch it, there's still the same number of networks, newspapers, etc... etc...

  4. Re:Does anybody else not give a shit about Superbo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, yes you are.

  5. I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Port starts preparing for each Super Bowl two years in advance...

    I just knew football was rigged!

  6. Pointless article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Can I please get back the 5 minutes that I spent reading the article?. he article had no details about the uplink to the internet/ISP. No details as to the number of hits the web server can handle. No information (not even looking for details) about the firewall.. just a pointless article.

    1. Re:Pointless article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It truly was... I was looking to get actual info, not OMG we have Blades! What the hell slashdot?

    2. Re:Pointless article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pointless game

    3. Re:Pointless article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you just lost it.

  7. Re:Does anybody else not give a shit about Superbo by morari · · Score: 1

    You are not the only uncaring one. Really.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  8. Actually... by Vertana · · Score: 2, Informative

    Offhand I can say that the NFL's needs are FAR greater in respect to media needs during the Superbowl as opposed to the World Series, but just in case, I found a link in about 5 seconds on Google.

    --
    "The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec^2" -Marcus Dolengo
    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I want to add a few things I have noticed. In the world series, you can lose one game by a very large margin, say 20, and still be the winner. And if the teams are equally good, you have SEVEN! games over which the decision is made. In the superbowl, the game will be finished today. That is it, no do over, no bad day. If you want to watch the superbowl, it is one day and one day only. The first few games of the world series aren't interesting to many, and if one team is better, the later games aren't that interesting either.

    2. Re:Actually... by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      That's (in my opinion) part of why the Super Bowl kicks the living hell out of the World Series in the Nielsen ratings, as well as international interest. If I haven't given a shit about baseball all year, I'm not going to start liking it enough to watch seven games. One, sure. Not seven.

    3. Re:Actually... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if your article supported your claim. But it not only fails to support it, it utterly and completely fails to address IT needs at all. (Here's a hint for you: The number of people watching has zip point zero to do with the IT infrastructure required - the same networks, newspapers, magazines, etc... are at both.)

  9. Not me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in pgh and could give two shits about the super bowl or the "stillers"

  10. That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but who's the IT Chef?

  11. errr by stonedcat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What the hell is a Super Bowl? Also what the fuck is an NFL?

    --
    You can't take the sky from me.
    1. Re:errr by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      What the hell is a Super Bowl?

      It's like...y'know...the thing after Net 2.0 and cloud-computing or something. Information gets stored in a pig-bladder and thrown around between nodes...or something...

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    2. Re:errr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bunch of US knuckleheads, wearing body armour, pretending they are sportsmen, and having a break every minute.
        The players are incapable of concious thought, and all the thinking is done by a slightly less stupid coach.

      It is a game for pussies. Real men play tough sports without body armour, such as rugby or Australian rules football, no pussies in those sports.

    3. Re:errr by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No, real men box.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:errr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Football used to be played without pads, you know.

      And it was nearly outlawed because too many people were dying on the field.

      How many people died from "tough sports" like Rugby, that doesn't allow forward passes and does allow interlocking formations? Yeah, playing Red Rover is a lot tougher than full speed collisions between the fastest human beings on the planet.

  12. Ninnle Ad at Halftime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word has it that Ninnle Labs has bought 30 seconds worth of adspace for Ninnle Linux and Ninnle Office, to air during the halftime of today's Superbowl. Rumour has it that it's a reworking of the classic '1984' Mac ad, directed by Ridley Scott. I can't wait to see this!

    1. Re:Ninnle Ad at Halftime? by Nimey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not true. It's really going to be a 30-second showing of Last Measure, complete with the "Hey everybody, I'm looking at gay porno!" soundtrack.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Ninnle Ad at Halftime? by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      It is wrong to tease new linux users with distros that do not exist. I took valuable time from my life to look for this reference only to discover that ninnle linux is a red herring, a joke, a hoax about as stupid as "pull my finger".

      If it exists, post a link, cite an article with a link, do something other the re-enforce a bad meme.

      Why did I search? Because *as* a new linux user I am always interested if the next distro is better, easier, more fun to play with then the last one I tried (or Ubuntu, my current distro).

      Cough up a link!

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    3. Re:Ninnle Ad at Halftime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not my fault you can't find any links. They're all over Google. I have Ninnle Linux running just fine on my system.

    4. Re:Ninnle Ad at Halftime? by andreyvul · · Score: 1

      Gentoo's better and more fun to play with.
      It's not easier than Ubuntu unless the topic is compiling.

      --
      proud caffeine whore
    5. Re:Ninnle Ad at Halftime? by AlHunt · · Score: 1

      It is wrong to tease new linux users with distros that do not exist. I took valuable time from my life to look for this reference only to discover that ninnle linux is a red herring, a joke, a hoax about as stupid as "pull my finger".

      Everyone knows MythicaLinux rocks the socks off Ninnle Linux anyway. Unless you have NVIDIA graphics, of course.

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    6. Re:Ninnle Ad at Halftime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I missed the ad, because I had to go and fix a server at work...no, not a Ninnle server...but I heard the ad got shuffled out of the way to make room for those USAir idiots, from the sinking A320. Did the ad play? What did you all think?

  13. Re:Does anybody else not give a shit about Superbo by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

    Interested in Superbore? Nope.

    Roll on the Six Nations next weekend. No special teams there....

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
  14. No Ads by bfree · · Score: 1

    This years Superbowl is being shown on BBC 1. Other (non-us) stations coverage of American Football is funny enough with the pundits having to cover up all the extra US ad time. It should be hilarious watching a new BBC team try and fill every second. I wonder if they will resort to showing, and commentating on, the ads that actually attract such a massive percentage of the viewing figures.

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    1. Re:No Ads by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      They should run the ads instead of covering them up, that's half the fun in watching the Super Bowl right there! (Although probably not this year, as companies are [or should be] looking for ways to cut back on expenses.)

    2. Re:No Ads by carlzum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Super Bowl without ads is like an adult movie on American network TV. Even avid football fans find the game boring. The neutral-site stadium is filled with disinterested corporate types, the pace is even slower than a typical NFL game, and the teams tend to play very conservative. The game must be unwatchable for anyone without a rooting and/or monetary interest.

      So why do so many Americans watch it? The ads, parties, beer, salted snacks, and gambling. Don't get me wrong, Americans love football, but Super Bowl Sunday has evolved into a national holiday. Football is as important to the Super Bowl as Jesus is to Christmas.

    3. Re:No Ads by Lershac · · Score: 1

      (Although probably not this year, as companies are [or should be] looking for ways to cut back on expenses.)

      FUCK THAT. If your company is doing well enough, and thinks that investing in some high profile advertising will increase their profits, more power to em.

      This attitude that we should all be looking for ways to cut back is just fear mongering bullshit. If no one takes risks and tries something new different or risky, then progress is retarded. You want the economy to revive? Correct the problems in the laws and then sit back and let business digest the changes. After a cycle of digestion, investment and profit-seeking will resume and the upswing will begin.

      Its all this long period of uncertainty and change that businesses and banks fear, so they hoard what they have, afraid tomorrows law change, or tomorrows sweeping health care reforms will put their business model at risk. Make it cut and dried, fix whats broke and move on.

      --
      Chuck
    4. Re:No Ads by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Do they really show it live, which would be the middle of the night in England? Otherwise, if it's taped and aired the next day they could just edit it down to a more reasonable length.

      I also can't see them showing the ads too. The ads are copyrighted so it's not like they can just rebroadcast them. While many companies probably wouldn't mind the free airtime, it would probably still be a mess to secure all the rights and do everything proper.

    5. Re:No Ads by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      As a Brit, could I please beg you to please find a way to get NFL out of the UK? It's the most tedious, inane sport I've ever had the misfortune to tune into from time to time. Idiotic commentators calling players 'superman' etc. don't help. There are SO many more entertaining, worthy sports that don't get coverage that it's really quite depressing that the BBC has started to cover this utter shit.

    6. Re:No Ads by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most of us Americans feel the same way about soccer (or football, if you prefer). Watching a soccer game is like watching a seemingly never-ending slog towards someone FINALLY scoring a single fucking goal. But, then, we all see our favorite sports through our own eyes. To each his own.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:No Ads by glennpratt · · Score: 1

      I don't know about everyone else, but this doesn't seem so insightful after the game last night.

      I mean, your second point is right, but the game was far from unwatchable.

    8. Re:No Ads by binarybum · · Score: 1

      It's the most tedious, inane sport I've ever had the misfortune to tune into from time to time.

      How have you managed to live in the UK and not accidentally tuned into a cricket match?

      --
      ôó
    9. Re:No Ads by carlzum · · Score: 1

      Well, it was insightful for the first three quarters at least :) This is two exciting finishes in a row, which has to make late-game advertisers happy. With a few minutes on the clock, the conservative game plans went out the window. I live about 10 miles north of the stadium and saw a lot of true Steelers fans there. I'll concede that the game and the crowd were much better than most Super Bowls.

    10. Re:No Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cricket is most probably the second biggest sport in the world after soccer.

  15. Re:Does anybody else not give a shit about Superbo by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    You're not; I used to be there with you, but I've gotten into it in the last few years. Ever watch an American football game? If you look closely, there's a wider game being played than it first seems - a huge amount of tactics and trying to out-think the opposing team goes into nearly every play.

  16. Great name by Hexact · · Score: 1

    Although the reference is nerdy, he has a great name for a guy in charge of networking.

  17. At Super Bowl - How is Power Backup Handled? by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

    I've long been curious as to whether major stadiums truly have reliable backup power? I know from first-hand experience many minor league stadiums certainly don't.

    It would be interesting to read what they do (or don't do) to handle unexpected power interruptions at the Super Bowl.

    While I figure the IT folks have their end covered, what about the TV folks (I assume they run their own power?), and more to the point, the field lighting and other equipment in the stadium itself, which draw massive amounts of power ... is all of that on backup? ... or do they just hope the local utility doesn't experience any problems during the event.

    I've been in some major venues, such as malls and even a casino, that, despite having some backup power, were not fully prepared resulting in closure / patrons being forced to leave.

    And most instances, it's often something simple that causes the power failure, such as a vehicle knocking down a utility pole or a blown transformer.

    Ron

    1. Re:At Super Bowl - How is Power Backup Handled? by sahonen · · Score: 1

      TV trucks for major shows like this have backup generators. Cameras and microphones are powered from the truck, so the whole show can keep going if the stadium blacks out, though with no lights in the stadium or the announcer booth there wouldn't be much to look at.

      "Routine" shows will run off stadium power since it's cheaper. I've got a couple stories of this backfiring, one of which I was present for... First story is a major entertainment awards show, the truck required 200 Amps of service, so that's what they ordered. During setup all of a sudden their breaker trips and the trucks go dead. They find out that the hotel lobby is on the same circuit as the loading dock, and the power outage coincided with a cleaning lady turning on her vacuum cleaner. Yup, the hoover put them over the edge of their power service. They got that fixed before the show and it went off without a hitch otherwise. Or at least as well as any live TV production can go.

      Second story is an NHL game during a thunderstorm. Most of the crew was at lunch, I was alone in the truck working. The audio guy had some music playing through the speakers. All of a sudden the music stopped, I looked up, and saw the entire wall of monitors in the truck do a synchronized flicker and all the equipment rebooted. It was quite the image, I can tell you... I ran to the lunch room even faster than normal around then.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  18. outsource the superbowl by weighn · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's my first superbowl (well, could be). Tried to watch before but just couldn't get to grips with all the stops and starts.

    Anyway, go Ben Graham - 1st Australian to play in a superbowl final.

    Next year, how about you outsource all the tech to Putin's Russia. You know, just as an international gesture of goodwill ... MalwareBowl

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  19. nice game by bestart32 · · Score: 1

    hope it will be a nice game

  20. Re:Does anybody else not give a shit about Superbo by hdparm · · Score: 1

    You can skip that crap, better watch Tri Nations mid year. To prepare for it, tune into Super 14 second weekend from today.

  21. Re:Does anybody else not give a shit about Superbo by xSauronx · · Score: 1

    Ive noticed the same thing as well. However, Im still more interested in Soccer, specifically the English Premier League.

    --
    By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  22. NBC, on the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NBC should've maybe let him plan the flashy extended scoreboard thingy they had on their site for the first two quarters. That thing didn't last too long, and it was laggy as hell while it worked. They've obviously never heard of the Slashdot effect.

  23. Not even close, universities are huge. by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    You obviously do not realize that here in the US most universities would not exist without the income generated by their football(US) teams.

    Yeah, that would make a lot of sense... if the yearly operating budget for a large public university wasn't measured in billions of dollars. Major universities are huge institutions, athletic revenues are a drop in the bucket.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  24. college football by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    the football programs lose money

    True at some, but certainly not all, schools. My alma mater made money on football, basketball, and hockey, while losing money on the rest. Of course it helps to have a team that is at least slightly well-regarded, and to be in a big conference.

    Whereas if you pay millions to your football staff, and post regular losing records, your odds of turning a profit are almost nil.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  25. Oblig. Simpsons Ref. by Hellburner · · Score: 1

    "Holds it...holds it....HOLDS IT!"