Slashdot Mirror


DragonFly BSD 2.2 Released

An anonymous reader writes "DragonFly BSD 2.2 is now available. The second release to feature the HAMMER (versioning, among other things) filesystem — now considered production-ready — it includes 'major stability improvements across the board, new drivers, much better pkgsrc support and integration.' Apart from the CD ISO, this release has a DVD ISO with 'a fully operational X environment,' as well as a bootable USB disk-key image."

44 comments

  1. First by Nethead · · Score: 3, Funny

    First post to say it's NOT dead!

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      386BSD is very dead much, as is 4.4BSD.

    2. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't think so, Mr. Shuttleworth...

    3. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes but looking at the number of comments for a front page slashdot story: wow, no one really cares.

      To be honest, it's surprising. It seems like they are doing a lot of interesting things, and it's a usable system, not just purely experimental.

    4. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Elegy For *BSD


      I am a *BSD user
      and I try hard to be brave
      That is a tall order
      *BSD's foot is in the grave.

      I tap at my toy keyboard
      and whistle a happy tune
      but keeping happy's so hard,
      *BSD died so soon.

      Each day I wake and softly sob
      Nightfall finds me crying
      Not only am I a zit faced slob
      but *BSD is dying.

    5. Re:First by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      BSD isn't dead, BSD is dying. There's a difference.

    6. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      FreeBSD is practically the same code as 386BSD. DragonflyBSD is practically the same code as FreeBSD.

      Hence DragonflyBSD is the same as 386BSD.

    7. Re:First by YAGNI · · Score: 0

      Could this be taken as a proof that the Slashdot readership does not represent the demography of computer users? Indeed, news for nerds.

      It is always luscious to observe that with the 1 % market share, the users of a particular operating system feel strong enough to downplay other systems.

      It is even more groovy to observe that the 1 % market share actually turns out to be 99 % market share. Only in Slashdot.

      This all leads to a question: how much of that 1 % market share is represented by the awkward socio-economic group called "fanboys"?

    8. Re:First by BOFHelsinki · · Score: 1

      Not by a long shot. All three kernels are vastly different.

    9. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is always luscious to observe

      Hmmm. I would've used a different word there.

      Anyway, you seem to be upset that people don't care about DragonFly BSD. Maybe Linux is just better.

    10. Re:First by arogier · · Score: 1

      horrendously different.

  2. Good to see by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...that somebody in BSD land is doing something genuinely different, and making it work.

    1. Re:Good to see by auric_dude · · Score: 1

      Lots of BSD http://daemonforums.org/index.php and a few BSD liveCD http://daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=1505 to try before you buy.

  3. Slashdotted :) by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmmm, 4 posts and it's slashdotted? I hope their server isn't running on BSD, for the sake of its publicity :)

    1. Re:Slashdotted :) by portscan · · Score: 1

      hardly slashdotted. don't you think that all the people downloading ISOs might have something to do with it?

      And of course it's running BSD (Netcraft confirms it.)

    2. Re:Slashdotted :) by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      don't you think that all the people downloading ISOs might have something to do with it?

      Most people that can are probably torrenting.

    3. Re:Slashdotted :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > FreeBSD Apache/2.0.63 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.63 OpenSSL/0.9.8j DAV/2 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.4.3

      Epic fail :D

  4. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to see something new. BSD > Linux

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSD > Linux

      Yeah, just keep on telling yourself that, all-star.

  5. Where have you been? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Someone in BSD land already DID do something different and something that works. In fact, it is so different, and works so well that it is now the most popular version of Unix ever made, eclipsing every other version of BSD and Linux by many orders of magnitude. It is used by anyone who has work to do and is sick of the hassles of the "open sores" development model and the unreliability of Windows.

    It's called "OS X", and it is made by Apple.

    1. Re:Where have you been? by Predius · · Score: 2, Informative

      OS X (Which I love as a workstation) isn't doing BSD any favors... they still don't have threading right...

    2. Re:Where have you been? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OS X is a kludge.

    3. Re:Where have you been? by not+already+in+use · · Score: 2, Informative

      OS X is a kludge.

      Freakin' Word. But it looks pretty.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    4. Re:Where have you been? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OSX benefits from a foundation of Open Source software and a userland developed with a centralized control that holds the developer's paychecks.
      The scratch-an-itch method of development works great for the kernel, but can get a little messy in the GUI.
      That is one reason I think MS could survive doing the same thing Apple did with OSX.

    5. Re:Where have you been? by trouser · · Score: 3, Funny

      What version of Perl are you running?

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    6. Re:Where have you been? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wasn't aware Internet ran on MacOSX - I always thought it was mostly Linux and various free *BSD...

      The things you learn.

      Or maybe the desktop isn't everything.
      *agnostic *nix user*

    7. Re:Where have you been? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn mac fanboy, OSX is crap on a stick compared to most bsd implementations. I use linux and even I know that. I got a mac mini when they first came out for free as a gift from a vendor of mine. I was all excited due to the hype, and after 2 days of playing with it, I realized it was crap and sold it for $500 which was real easy to do cause they had a long waiting list back then.

  6. Release Notes by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was able to get in before it was fully slashdotted (it was crawling when there were only two posts here).

    Here are some US mirrors:
    CA ftp://mirrors.isc.org/pub/DragonFly/
    TX ftp://mirror.evilprojects.net/pub/DragonFlyBSD/
    VA ftp://ftp.theshell.com/pub/DragonFly/iso-images/

    And some EU ones:
    UK ftp://ftp.as6911.net/pub/DragonFly/
    Germany ftp://chlamydia.fs.ei.tum.de/pub/DragonFly/

    Here's the Release Notes:
    Release Improvements

    * A new DVD ISO release image is now available, in addition to the CD release.
    * The new DVD release has a full X environment ready-to-go and many packages pre-installed.
    * A full pkgsrc tar is now available on the CD/DVD in /usr.
    * Full sources tar now available on the DVD (kernel sources only on the CD), in /usr.
    * The nrelease build now trivializes package selection for people creating customized releases.
    * The installer is now able to create a HAMMER filesystem setup.

    Kernel changes

    * First step towards AMD64 support (done by Jordan Gordeev during the Google Summer of Code 2008).
    * The system control intr_mpsafe is enabled by default.
    * Move /kernel to /boot/kernel and /modules to /boot/modules.
    * Add RFC3542 support (done by Dashu Huang during the Google Summer of Code 2008).
    * Add HW checksum support to the loopback interface, which doubles performance.
    * acpi_cpu(4) update. It's now possible to use higher (lower power usage) C states than C1 in modern (multicore) CPUs.
    * First steps to use network threads without the Big Giant Lock (this feature is considered experimental).
    * Fixed CVE-2008-2476 IPv6 security issue with modified patches from NetBSD.
    * bridge_input works now in parallel.
    * Fix bugs in dealing with low-memory situations when the system has run out of swap or has no swap.
    * Major rewrite of usched_bsd4 and related support logic, plus additional improvements to the LWKT scheduler.
    * Major revamping of the pageout and low-memory handling code.
    * suser_* replaced with priv_* implementation from FreeBSD.

    HAMMER changes

    * HAMMER is now considered production-capable. Many bug fixes and other improvements have been made.
    * It is now possible to boot from a HAMMER-only disk. No need for a single UFS partition for /boot. However, for production systems we still recommend a small UFS /boot followed by swap followed by one large HAMMER partition.
    * Add HAMMER read support to the boot loader.
    * Now uses per-mount kmalloc pools for bulk data structures, particularly for inodes and records.

    Hardware changes

    * Add ACPI support module for IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad laptops (from FreeBSD).
    * Add ACPI support module Asus laptops (from FreeBSD).
    * Add acpi_video(4) - a driver for ACPI video extensions (from FreeBSD).
    * It is possible to power down PCI devices during

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  7. HAMMER Time by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

    The second release to feature the HAMMER (versioning, among other things) filesystem

    So what you're saying is that efs2 and ffs/ufs can't touch this.

    HAMMER TIME!

    1. Re:HAMMER Time by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      But I though that "Stop" errors were a Windows feature...

    2. Re:HAMMER Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the younger generation even gets this joke? I feel old.

    3. Re:HAMMER Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, ufs is too legit to quit.

    4. Re:HAMMER Time by wisty · · Score: 1

      It's a reference to xkcd, right?

  8. Re:xfs sucks by setagllib · · Score: 1

    You'll be fine with ext3 created with largefile4 options, and mounted with data=ordered.

    mke2fs -j -T largefile4 /dev/myvg/mylv

    --
    Sam ty sig.
  9. Re:Also check out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoosh?

  10. Re:First - Hail! And Farewell! by the+fronny · · Score: 1

    80MB root is clean. The modem sings
    Its handshake and your tired rant,
    Warm on amber screen, is a comfort
    To me; As perennial as the rain.

  11. Re:xfs sucks by YAGNI · · Score: 0

    You just keep hammering that ext3.

  12. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor Matt sure does take his grudges seriously, doesn't he? 2.2 Versions too seriously, apparently. Another project that was forked out of bitterness and overinflated egos that nobody except the losers making the loud noise care about.