Slashdot Mirror


Terminally Sick Boy Given Truancy Warning

A school has apologized for sending a truancy letter to the mother of a boy suffering from leukemia after she asked to take him out of classes to meet the Pope before he died. Louise Yates asked for permission from St Botolph's School to take her her six-year-old son Travis on a two-day trip to the Vatican in June for a blessing with the Pope. In response she got a letter about truancy and a copy of his attendance record. The school has since apologized and released a statement saying, "We are aware of Travis' illness and have given permission for him to travel to Rome during term-time. Government guidance suggests sending attendance information out with permission letters, but we appreciate in this instance it may not have been appropriate and we would like to apologise if this has caused the family any offence."

20 comments

  1. Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The pope is gonna have some fun tonight.

  2. Doctors Note by Joebert · · Score: 4, Funny
    Did they ask him to bring in a Pope Note when he got back ?

    Please excuse Bobbys' absense from class as he was busy being blessed.

    The Pope

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Doctors Note by unlametheweak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be more curious to know if the Pope faith healed him back to health.

    2. Re:Doctors Note by Genda · · Score: 1

      No, but he was able to share the lovely "Pope Soap on a Rope" he got from the Vatican gift shop at show and tell.

    3. Re:Doctors Note by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      I'd be more curious to know if the Pope faith healed him back to health.

      Easy to answer: no he won't. What do you expect: miracles?

  3. Why is this here? by westlake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An unfortunately worded form letter is routinely sent out by a secretary who had no reason to know - and no right to know - that the kid was dying.

    1. Re:Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Because the school fucked up. All they had to do was tell the secretary "don't send this boy's family a letter, he is excused." No reason necessary.

    2. Re:Why is this here? by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When I first read the title I felt the same outrage you express. After reading the entire thing I can see how it happened. It was a mistake. One the school explained, owned up to and apologized for. It was not done maliciously but through typical bureaucratic red tape. What's rare about this is the apology. I don't know how many times I've seen a screw up like this where when the backlash hits the bureaucrats circle the wagons and start to get defensive, never wanting to admit the mistake.

    3. Re:Why is this here? by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

      owned up to

      Funny, what i saw was "uh.... the Gummint suggested we do it!" and "may not have been appropriate" and "if this has caused the family any offense." Moar qualifiers and excuses plz!

      It's your responsibility to know what automated frickin' processes kick in, and to know when to flag an exception and stop them. "Gee, we don't really run our own systems any more, the Computer did it" is the modern version of "i was just following stupid orders." No. Ignorance of your own operations is not an excuse; it is, in fact, a further indication of incompetence.

    4. Re:Why is this here? by The+Mysterious+Dr.+X · · Score: 1

      I've seen quite a few community events designed to help terminally ill children in some way, like fund-raisers for trips to see the Pope, bone marrow drives to find a donor match (which may or may not apply in this case, depending on type of leukemia), or to raise money for other expensive treatments. I don't know if it's the norm, since terminal patients who don't have such publicity would be unknown to me, but people frequently do these things to "raise awareness," not to protect their right to privacy. The secretary may well have known and done it anyway in order to follow the rules. After all, nobody gets in trouble for following the rules, right?

  4. Wait, what?! by Kokuyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The kid is terminally ill and still has to go to school? Was he Hitler in a previous life or why else would anyone be so heartless as to make him attend such a behaviour correction centre when he clearly does not have a future for which he has to prepare?

    1. Re:Wait, what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the UK. At this point it's a lot like Nazi Germany. Except this time everyone is Jewish! ;)

    2. Re:Wait, what?! by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      Actually, its mostly Pakistani now.

    3. Re:Wait, what?! by mvdw · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a lot of kids in that situation would rather lead a "normal life" than be cooped up at home with no friends, nothing to do but play playstation and watch dvds, etc.

  5. Maybe the secretary _should_ have known by smchris · · Score: 1

    One of the famous comparative studies of how American kids start out on par and decline relative to the performance of other countries was done comparing Japan, Taiwan and the U.S. They concluded, for instance, that Japanese cramming was more of a myth than thought. While the American kids might be occupied with sports after school, the Japanese kids might be occupied with something like calligraphy that was also non-academic.

    The most striking difference between countries was the percentage of kids who were "missing" in American schools. They may have been in the building but the administration just couldn't tell the researcher where they were at any given time.

  6. Why bother with school? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    School is meant to prepare kids for adult life, but this kid is dying and won't reach adulthood, so is there really any point in him attending school? Why not just let him enjoy what time he has rather than trying to force him to learn stuff he will never use?

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Why bother with school? by Adriax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hope that the disease will go into remission or someone will find a cure, or atleast a treatment to prolong his life.
      Legal requirements that ALL children must be registered and attending school if they are physically able to.
      The desire to give the kid atleast a semblance of a normal life, with interaction with others his own age.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    2. Re:Why bother with school? by bsharp8256 · · Score: 0

      Terminal illness is terminal illness. There is no hope of it going into remission. It would also be hard to make a case that a cure for leukemia will be found within 6 months or less (the maximum length of time a terminal patient is expected to live, according to Wikipedia). Let the boy out of school to enjoy his final months, unless he is there because of choice.

  7. Free England by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    We are aware of Travis' illness and have given permission for him to travel

    In England, schools have to give permission for their students to travel? WTF? If they consider themselves legal guardians, perhaps they'd like to take a share of all the other responsibilities of parenting, too?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.