Improving the Abilities of Bionic Arm Patients
Al writes "Tech Review has an article about the progress being made on prosthetic arms that can be controlled using nerves that once connected to the missing limb via muscles in the chest. Todd Kuiken, director of the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's Center for Bionic Medicine has pioneered the technique, which has so far given more than 30 patients the ability to control a mechanical prosthetic simply by thinking about moving their old arm. Those who have had the procedure report using their arm to slice hot peppers, open a bag of flour, put on a belt, operate a tape measure, or remove a new tennis ball from a container. The next step is to add sensing capabilities to the arms so that this information can be fed back to the reconnected nerves."
Can you safely whack off with the bionic arm? It's like giving yourself a stranger!
....so it might be hard to get first post!
-
It's shit like this that makes me want to be alive 100 and 150 years from now. Not because I want to live forever but because think about all the cool shit those guys are gonna have.
one of these things cost an arm & a leg!
Mod parent up!
TFA mentions that they have to relocate the remaining nerves(the chest seems to be a popular destination); but doesn't say why. Do the nerves atrophy if they are left in the stump? Is there some sort of feedback mechanism by which a nerve can detect whether or not it is still connected to a muscle?
I'm a one-armed commando in need of a bionic arm. However, I was hoping to acquire one with a grappling hook attachment instead of the ubiquitous mechanized hand replacements. I have reason to believe that Imperialist Nazis are trying to resurrect Adolf Hitler and believe a grappling hook would help me stop them, especially when my underdeveloped leg muscles and inability to jump vertically, diagonally, or horizontally are taken into account. Does anyone know where I might find such a gadget? Any information is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Ladd
Something is missing still. Do we know the language of nerve impulses?
Then you'd get a first cut at this stuff. Are we geeky enough?
This is good progress, but still a kludge because it uses muscles rather than a direct nerve attachment.
It's also worth following the attempts that've been made on the extreme low-end of the budget scale, to upgrade traditional prosthetics. (What is that one type called? Troutman Hook?) I'm more interested in the bionic ones because they're versatile and cool, but it's also important to consider who can afford the tech and to make it as widely available as practical.
Revive the Constitution.
We've got about 20 years (tops) before these things become better than human hands (more powerful, less fatigue, etc).
Singularity, baby!!
If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
I know I'll get modded down for this, but, hmmm...Let's test this out...
Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
Mod parent up!
Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
Audio effects -- zha na na na ...
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
This is good progress, but still a kludge because it uses muscles rather than a direct nerve attachment.
I don't know what you mean by that, because TFA says that the motors are controlled by nerves. For example, the nerves that used to innervate her biceps were just rewired to other muscles after the amputation, so that now they can take those nerves and connect them to the motors that clench the forearm. The motors therefore act as muscles, though obviously in a different physiological manner.
This is good progress, but still a kludge because it uses muscles rather than a direct nerve attachment.
Don't quote me on this, but I'm assuming its because unconnected axons don't fire or degenerate too quickly to be used. I'm more certain that unopposed synapses are unstable and not functional, you don't want neurons just dumping neurotransmitter into nothing. I know that in development, some neurons require functional synapses for survival, and unconnected projections from neurons disappear. So I'd guess that if you have a motorneuron running into an arm that wasn't there anymore, the axon might go through cycles of formation and degeneration, or might not transmit an impulse at all, unless it had a synapse, which it wouldn't have unless there was something to synapse with. I suspect it's more complicated than that, or I'm completely off, since biology is always more complicated than theory, let alone half-informed theory.
If you do need something to anchor the axon like that, you probably wouldn't need to use muscles you use for other things. They were testing a concept here, if it pans out they might transplant some muscle cells to the stump of the limb, re-innervate that, and then use those axons. The muscles would still flex but wouldn't be moving anything. Or maybe not, I really don't know anything about surgery and very little about neurobiology.
This is excellent news. I hope that this gets cheap enough to be common place for people who have lost limbs.
But I cannot help but think that it'll not be long until "We are the Borg."
Good video at 60 minutes about the bionic arms being developed by DARPA for this project.
It's a lot better than nothing, but it's a kludge in the sense that you can see these people's chest muscles contorting whenever they move their bionic arm.
I read that as Improving the Abilities of Bionic Arm Patents ...
can i just say that the dept. tag on this is possibly the worst pun i've ever seen on slashdot?
Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
-kfg