Slashdot Mirror


Racist Facial Recognition Software

An anonymous reader writes "A black man found that his HP facial-tracking recognition software wouldn't work. Then he discovered it worked fine for a white co-worker. From the article: 'HP's Tony Welch thanked Desi and Wanda, the video's creators, and promised that he and the team at HP were looking into why the camera was behaving the way it was. "The technology we use is built on standard algorithms that measure the difference in intensity of contrast between the eyes and the upper cheek and nose," he said. "We believe that the camera might have difficulty 'seeing' contrast in conditions where there is insufficient foreground lighting."'"

49 comments

  1. Black / white or male / female? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With this extensive testing performed on the camera (only 2 subjects), i wouldn't dare to say for sure that it is because he is black. They two are different on more things than skin color (i.e., sex).

    Anyway if I had to bet I would also bet on "blackness", but I'm just pointing some flaws in their straightforward conclusions.

  2. Contrast to speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I do not think HP is out right racist. But his skin color does have an effect. His eyes, cheek, and nose are of similar color.
    Therefore the recognition software will interpret no difference in variables, because it can not see any contrast. This makes triangulation impossible. Simply a bug in software design.

    A possible solution would be an adjuster to the contrast ratio for the recognition points. Allowing the user to adjust it. Though hard to teach to people who prefer plug-n-play style of settings.

    1. Re:Contrast to speculation by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This isn't even a bug in software design -- it's simple physics. Darker skin = less contrast = software has a harder time seeing him.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    2. Re:Contrast to speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In related news, it also discriminates against people with camo facepaint.

    3. Re:Contrast to speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't even a bug in software design -- it's simple physics. Darker skin = less contrast = software has a harder time seeing him.

      Uh. It's facial recognition software. If it can't recognize a face, that's clearly a bug. The fault is with (horribly) inadequate testing, not physics.

    4. Re:Contrast to speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, unless programming can magically improve the quality of the hardware and lighting conditions, uh, it's not. There is no control in this test. Perhaps if the subjects were front lit instead of rear lit, the camera would not distinguish her features as they would be "whited-out". Would that, then, be racist? The camera and software are not racist. Stop anthropomorphizing objects.

    5. Re:Contrast to speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not a bug, its a feature

    6. Re:Contrast to speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well obviously physics is racist.

    7. Re:Contrast to speculation by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      This isn't even a bug in software design -- it's simple physics. Darker skin = less contrast = software has a harder time seeing him.

      Watch the video again. Clearly there is MORE contrast between the background and the black guy than with the white woman because the background in that video is the light colored ceiling.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    8. Re:Contrast to speculation by dmizer · · Score: 1

      Watch the video again. Clearly there is MORE contrast between the background and the black guy than with the white woman because the background in that video is the light colored ceiling

      It's not about contrast between the face and the background. Its about contrast within the face itself. The facial recognition feature is programmed to triangulate differences in contrast on the face itself. This way, the software can tell the difference between a face and something else that just happens to be around or near the camera.

      You can't create more contrast on a dark face. So unfortunately, this means that the software cannot recognize a dark skinned face from something that just happens to be around or near the camera.

  3. Clearly by geekoid · · Score: 1

    it just doesn't trust white people and need to keep an eye on them~

    It's also pretty clear the the creators of the software where white.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  4. Don't be quick to complain by mechsoph · · Score: 5, Funny

    When the robot wars come, then we'll see who's laughing...

    1. Re:Don't be quick to complain by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Best. Comment. Ever.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    2. Re:Don't be quick to complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's. Not.

    3. Re:Don't be quick to complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was pretty good though

    4. Re:Don't be quick to complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahahahah. like, " get embarased " . best comment ever.

  5. Quick to judge by diamondsandrain · · Score: 1

    Notice how slashdot jumps on the item as inflammatory of a way as possible.... calling it racist. Way to be fair slashdot.

    1. Re:Quick to judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people are just having fun with it. No one seriously believes HP or the computer is raciest simply because it has a problem detecting a dark skinned face.

      There is very little contrast in that situation and it probably can't see the facial features that make tells it that a face is present. They might be able to fix it by artificially cranking the contrast way up in software.

      Sorry, just the nature of the problem. Dark contrasts are always going to be hard to make out. It's hard for humans to do it too.

    2. Re:Quick to judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that was the article. And even the original article put it in quotes as they were mocking the idea. Take a joke kid.

    3. Re:Quick to judge by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      MSNBC article calling software "racist" in 3,2,1...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Quick to judge by blhack · · Score: 1

      Or it could be that they're quoting what the guy...you know...said in the video.

      "I'm going on record...Hewlett Packard computers are racist, there I said it!"

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    5. Re:Quick to judge by diamondsandrain · · Score: 1

      I had heard about the item before slashdot so I was aware of the situation. Although the way it is phrased here on Slashdot is a shock headline to get you to read it. Seems to be a standard slimy practice. Not strange for Slashdot though.

    6. Re:Quick to judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is "They all look alike anyway"?

  6. TV to the rescue by Krishnoid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Luckily, a similar situation was addressed and resolved in a Better off Ted episode.

  7. Viola-Jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're describing the Viola-Jones algorithm. Because it doesn't use colour (frames are converted to monochrome and normalised to account for different lighting conditions) it usually works well regardless of skin colour.

    1. Re:Viola-Jones by gravisan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have worked with Viola-Jones before - it is extremely robust to lighting conditions. However what it is not robust to is angular changes (twisting of face sideways). It is possible that HP are using some kind of naiive algorithm to achieve face tracking, an easy one for e.g. is simple edge analysis for eye recognition (easier if you have a infrared emitter - to exploit the red eye effect) and then using this extrapolate facial dimensions then to facilitate tracking. It is possible they use Viola-Jones for the initial stage to locate the face region and then begin tracking, so even though the VJ tracker is very good, the processing further in the chain isn't so robust. Part of the reason for doing this might be that the VJ tracker is expensive in terms of compute cycles.

    2. Re:Viola-Jones by Nova77 · · Score: 1

      VJ is expensive?? Is one of the cheapest type of face recognition algorithms out there!
      I implemented my own for my ML class in 2004 and it was running on 60fps on a supercheap laptop.

  8. blame testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    software developed and tested on the faces of pasty white software engineers.

  9. Not racist at all - here's why by MindPrison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The recognition software is looking for contrast spots, such as shadow from the nose, eye-sockets, and ultimately the head shape, if these criteria isn't met - then it has a problem.

    It's the same with eg. Sony PS3's Playstation EYE - and eg. the new game EYEPET, you try that on at home against a dark floor, dark carpet, no matter how much light you put on, the pet won't react to you.

    Same with me - I'm a white guy, and unfortunately my floor is sorta white colored (wood, flesh like...if you're slightly yellow in the skin, don't worry - bad indoor light WILL look pale yellowish) ;)
    Even with 200 watts of lighting - I had problems with my EYEPET and PS camera, it's virtually useless and incredibly annoying.

    Trust me buddy, there's no difference with HP's camera software, the same stuff. Wait until MicroSofts Project NATAL comes out, then you're going to be pleased, it will reckognize ALL colors! Because it has an extra infrared camera!

    You're kind of funny though ;) You have a talent for talking on tv, not everybody have that gift, you do!

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  10. hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I was watching this, I got "Find an African Date" AD from Youtube... Something strangeis going on here.

  11. Not Racist, But... by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    ...this was an "edge case" they obviously did not test for!

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  12. Missed the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, this is funny and ironic. It isn't inflammatory. Most racism singles out "people of color", and this facial recognizer matches only white faces.

    1. Re:Missed the Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This system is a stroke of genius: use it at a security checkpoint for your favorite gated community. Set it so that all detected faces will open the gate for one single person. If anyone complains about racism, blame insufficient technology and a constrained budget. Enjoy a peaceful neighborhood.

  13. The only racism by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    is the person that submitted this. It is DIFFICULT to get this kind of thing done correctly. Heck, America has spent BILLIONS since 9/11 trying to handle facial recognition. And we are still nowhere near close. To the original submitter, please keep your racism to yourself.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. Oh, please by new+death+barbie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SOMEBODY developed this facial tracking software, and HP vetted it for installation on thousands or millions of computers.

    Either this problem will come as a complete surprise to them, or they knew about it and released it anyway. Both alternatives are pretty upsetting.

    Because either there were no test cases involving black people -- for an algorithm that depends on skin contrast, you'd think this would be a no-brainer -- or they knew there was a problem, but never expected black people to buy it.

    --

    It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

    1. Re:Oh, please by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Or they had enough lighting on their black people and it wasn't a problem.

    2. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't notice, they were only using fluorescent lighting mounted what looks like 60 feet above them. Put a light bulb in from of the guy and it should work. You are just jumping to conlusions, and pointing out to everyone you have racist tendencies. Besides, the guy in the video is obviously just having fun with it, and thinks it is funny. He was sarcastic, if you didn't notice.

  15. Seriously? by msgyrd · · Score: 1

    A project that doesn't get outsourced to India and look what happens.

  16. What, no GNAA trolls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think this story would bring them out of the woodwork...

  17. This is a good thing by vvaduva · · Score: 1

    When in fact Skynet becomes self aware, this will be a good thing for the dude :)

  18. PROFIT!!! by pyromega · · Score: 1

    1. get a HP laptop
    2. tell ppl the laptop track ppl's soul
    3. claim u can get their soul back for them for a fee
    5. ???
    6. PROFIT!!!

  19. What? it doesn't even have a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beer tap?

    What kind of entertaining robot doesn't serve beer?
    I mean come on this is 2010.

  20. Glare? by ins0m · · Score: 1

    Not to be offensive, but how greasy is this guy's face? You'd think there would be *more* contrast between his skin and his corneas and teeth, which would make a general "face" easier to pick out (even if it were a Cheshire-cat caricature, it's a baseline). However, there's a noticable glare off his forehead that I'd imagine would skew the results (as it'd significantly take a chunk out of his otherwise-round head to the point it wouldn't even hit on a fuzzy match).

    My suggestion is to get this guy some Noxzema and try again.

    --
    Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
    1. Re:Glare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's not offensive, that's old-fashioned rude.

  21. Natal had same kind of problems too by Deneidez · · Score: 1
  22. lmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lmao

  23. Also not racist for another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    racism

    1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

    I haven't asked the camera but I don't believe it has such a belief.

  24. Re:What? it doesn't even have a by scott666 · · Score: 1

    Since when does all-in-one PC = robot?

    --
    Thank you for helping us help you help us all.