Slashdot Mirror


Ushahidi Crowd-Sources Crisis Response

We mentioned late last year how open source software called Ushahidi — which means 'testimony' in Swahili — developed for election monitoring in Kenya was being used to similar effect in Afghanistan. Now reader Peace Corps Online adds a report from the NY Times that Ushahidi's is now becoming a hero of the Haitian and Chilean earthquakes. "Ushahidi is used to gather distributed data via SMS, email, or web and visualize it on a map or timeline. The program was developed after violence erupted during Kenya's disputed election in 2007. Ory Okolloh, a prominent Kenyan lawyer and blogger, had gone back to Kenya to vote and observe the election. After receiving threats about her work, she returned to South Africa where she posted her idea of an Internet mapping tool to allow people to report anonymously on violence and other misdeeds. Volunteers built the Ushahidi Web platform over a long weekend, and the site began plotting on a map, using the locations given by informants, user-generated cellphone reports of riots, stranded refugees, rapes, and deaths. When the Haitian earthquake struck, Ushahidi went into action receiving thousands of messages reporting trapped victims; the same happened following the Chile earthquake. The Washington Post also used Ushahidi during the recent blizzards to build a site to map road blockages and the location of available snowplows and blowers. 'Ushahidi suggests a new paradigm in humanitarian work,' writes Anand Giridharadas. 'The old paradigm was one-to-many: foreign journalists and aid workers jet in, report on a calamity, and dispense aid with whatever data they have. The new paradigm is many-to-many-to-many: victims supply on-the-ground data; a self-organizing mob of global volunteers translates text messages and helps to orchestrate relief; then journalists and aid workers use the data to target the response.'"

71 comments

  1. Sounds like a great tool by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    How can we monetize it?

    1. Re:Sounds like a great tool by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do you have no soul at all? Or is this supposed to be sarcasm?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:Sounds like a great tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Reads like great sarcasm to me.

    3. Re:Sounds like a great tool by deniable · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your idea sucks.

    4. Re:Sounds like a great tool by deniable · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reads like management to me.

    5. Re:Sounds like a great tool by keeboo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Slashdot should block tags such as and for anonymous posters.

    6. Re:Sounds like a great tool by 2obvious4u · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What is wrong with monetizing it? There is money to be made all along the path of a disaster. Someone still has to transport disaster relief and pay for disaster supplies. Then someone has to rebuild the businesses behind the disaster. There are lots of places to make money while also helping those in need. You may not make huge profit margins like you can selling people worthless crap they want; but you can make a good money helping people using economies of scale. So you make $0.10 a head on 2 million needy people, you also provided them goods and services they needed. Its not like you caused the disaster to make a profit, but you found a way to make a living helping those in need.

  2. Refreshing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks for this. Ive been getting sick of hearing about high profile lawsuits over patents and arguing over why this programming language or that database paradigm. This actually helps humanity, this is meaningful.

    1. Re:Refreshing by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Everything that passes either into the public domain or is open source helps humanity in one way or another.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Refreshing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is a bunch of half-finished projects that maybe 5 people ever use helping humanity?

    3. Re:Refreshing by lordsid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because when you need it, it's there.

      --
      IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
    4. Re:Refreshing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude, I have to tell you, when you have something you want to do, finding a half eaten golden apple on sourceforge that looks like someone took a couple of bites out of the apple you want to build is ... well, golden. It's called sharing. Maybe you don't want to finish or can't, but share it and someone else can. I've done this twice now. Either it was not finished or did less than I required but the code given away like that helped my world, and then as a result the world of others. My latest stab at using someone else's help is on Android. From Hello World to Hello App... it works, and I share it back

  3. mmmmm by edson+at+lies.cl · · Score: 0

    a very useful software, but mobile downtime or zero internet access makes it (i think) low accurate

    (chile's earthquake link is wrong)

    --
    i have found, you can find,happiness in slavery!
  4. What a cool way to block ObamaCare(tm) by approachingZero+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Our goal is to create the simplest way of aggregating information from the public for use in crisis response.' Sweet, I'll send this link to some of my tea party buddies.

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
    1. Re:What a cool way to block ObamaCare(tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sweet, I'll send this link to some of my teabagging buddies."

        - FT4Y

  5. Free software ! by MagicFab · · Score: 1

    /me likes :
    "The beta version platform is now available as an open source application that others can download for free,..."

    We just need to cheat in the annoying form at:
    http://download.ushahidi.com/

    --
    Notepad specialist & FAT administrator, group training available
    1. Re:Free software ! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      /me likes :
      "The beta version platform is now available as an open source application that others can download for free,..."

      We just need to cheat in the annoying form at:
      http://download.ushahidi.com/

      Well that same form points directly to github.

  6. APRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is exactly what APRS does in the ham radio community since a good 20 years, and it does not need any special infrastructure. And yes, it can ALSO use the internet

    1. Re:APRS by tuomas_kaikkonen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not all have amateur radio licenses. Ushahidi can use devices you do not need licenses for (mobile phone SMS, email, web). Some goods links: http://github.com/ushahidi http://ushahidi.com/

  7. Given enough eyeballs, all crises are shallow. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Rainbow's End coming to fruition. Well, the beginning of it, anyway. No more psuedomimiviruses sneaking past!

    Hmm...I gotta go; I'm having a serious craving for some honeyed nougat all of a sudden. Ya gotta believe me!

    1. Re:Given enough eyeballs, all crises are shallow. by bh_doc · · Score: 1

      So close... Rainbows End. It even points out the curious lack of an apostrophe in the book itself.

      Unless you were talking about the album or the amusement park.

      Yeah, I'm nitpicking. :-)

    2. Re:Given enough eyeballs, all crises are shallow. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      So close... Rainbows End. It even points out the curious lack of an apostrophe in the book itself.
      Unless you were talking about the album or the amusement park.
      Yeah, I'm nitpicking. :-)

      Nitpick away, just don't spoil it! I'm only about 30% of the way into the book, so I haven't run into that explanation yet. :)

  8. The Hive Mind Is Your Friend. by Securityemo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only reason I can see for a digital ID, is something like this wired into our governmental bureaucracy. The Swedish gov. is trying to bootstrap such a system, and people seems to be liking it, generally. In fact, my ID card has a digital ID chip - it doesn't do anything at the moment, though.

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
  9. I love this idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I hate being "that guy", but is this system open to abuse -- for example, post natural disaster when people are sending messages like "HELP! DOOR HAS BEEN BLOWN OFF AT " -- couldn't naughty people potentially use this system to find the vulnerable among us?

    1. Re:I love this idea... by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That might happen in the developed world but you have to remember these few things.

      A) In a lot of natural disasters everyone is the victim, there are few people just surfing the internet who are completely unaffected and can go 2 miles to loot

      B) Looting will happen anyways, its generally pretty easy to tell where someone isn't at home and there are valuables left unguarded

      C) Power outages plus the fact that most disasters that would require this are in the undeveloped world means that not everyone can easily have access to the information

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:I love this idea... by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      and I hate being "that guy", but is this system open to abuse -- for example, post natural disaster when people are sending messages like "HELP! DOOR HAS BEEN BLOWN OFF AT " --

      ... goatse.cx?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:I love this idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell phones can be good for a couple of days with low usage, hours with one of the few local 12V generators to run them. Plenty of cars in the second and third world have lighter adapters for cell phone chargers as well: even without gasoline, a car battery has a very robust charge and should be able to recharge quite a few cell phones before being depleted. While cell phones may not be in every household, they're considered a critical necessity in households where reliable telephone lines are few and far between and hideously expensive.

      The cell phone towers are more vulnerable: they can be jammed or destroyed by guerrilla fighters and para-military, and more sophisticated troops can be expected to have equipment to detect and even tap normal cell phones. So they take extra work to be used to report government harassment, such as the genocide of Ethiopia, Afghan reporting of either Taliban _or_ American troops, and Russian military abuses in Georgia.

    4. Re:I love this idea... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      people are sending messages like "HELP! DOOR HAS BEEN BLOWN OFF AT "

      I'm Michael Caine, you insensitive bloody clod!!!!!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:I love this idea... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it can be abused, but so can just about any crowdsourced technology. Wikipedia is prone to abuse, but on the whole is a tremendously valuable and accurate tool.

      This is not meant to be used in the same way that a 911 system gets used, where one person reports something at a location and expects a directed response to that incident. In cases of natural or civil disasters, it is very difficult and not particularly equitable to distribute resources to combat individual problems. Instead, this would be a tool to help determine where to direct broad aid: what section of the city is facing the worst problems, where should the next food depot be established, where should you direct a police brigade to quell violence? As the tools get better and the availability of resources improves, you can start targeting the smaller targets.

    6. Re:I love this idea... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!

  10. Lots of data, sure, but not reliable data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, an anonymous system like this can get you lots of statistical data, but it's not verifiable data. In a scenario where there is emotional or ideological conflict, like an election, it would be trivial to abuse the system to corrupt the data, at the very least. It's also open to abuse by individual pranksters.

    1. Re:Lots of data, sure, but not reliable data by grcumb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, an anonymous system like this can get you lots of statistical data, but it's not verifiable data. In a scenario where there is emotional or ideological conflict, like an election, it would be trivial to abuse the system to corrupt the data, at the very least. It's also open to abuse by individual pranksters.

      Everything you've said above can also be said of Wikipedia. These shortcomings are real, but they do little to reduce its overall usefulness.

      As long as the volume of data is significant enough and it's mostly honestly derived, the service will work.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:Lots of data, sure, but not reliable data by timmarhy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it's not at all like wikipedia though (wikipedia has shit loads of problems, probably best not to use it as an example). if someone has an axe to grind and starts reporting 10 rapes a day in a certain area, how do others edit or even verify it in this model? atleast in wikipedia you can examine facts.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:Lots of data, sure, but not reliable data by grcumb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's not at all like wikipedia though (wikipedia has shit loads of problems, probably best not to use it as an example).

      The fact that wikipedia has shitloads of problems is precisely my point. Any crowd-sourcing application will have similar problems, but they still work, by and large.

      if someone has an axe to grind and starts reporting 10 rapes a day in a certain area, how do others edit or even verify it in this model?

      In this model? I don't know. I can't get to the site right now; it must be slashdotted. That means I can't comment on the specific implementation. One would hope that a simple design would allow the typical strengths of crowd-sourcing to come through, though. As a general rule, if the preponderance of data is good (i.e. honestly derived), the service has value.

      The 10 rapes a day example would play out one of two ways:

      1. In a low-violence situation, the aberrant data would stand out like a sore thumb.
      2. In a high-violence situation (e.g. armed insurrection, etc.), it would disappear into the noise.

      In either case, the bad data wouldn't significantly debase the overall value of the service itself because, as I said in my original post, most people are honest about these things most of the time. That would make the service mostly useful.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    4. Re:Lots of data, sure, but not reliable data by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      Statistical analysis.... Given enough data, you should be able to see a pattern in real data. Then you can filter for anomalies. Either investigate the anomalies or dismiss them. For example, the recent spate of "My Prius drove at 94 MPH" reports are anomalies that don't jive with the reported facts.

      You will always have people falsely reporting data, but at least you will have overall patterns and outliers, which is more than you have now.

      If you have 10 rape reports a day coming from a gov't owned IP block, all using similar wording, that's a good indicator that may be false. If, OTOH, you have 10 rape reports a day coming from different ISP blocks, diffferent wording, different spelling errors and grammar, those are probably legit.

  11. I am in business by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    I could use it to sell real estate on the cheap!

  12. I'm skeptical by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Open platforms are built on a trust model that can be easily broken by a small* group of motivated individuals.
    So just wait until /b/tards decide to get their lulz by spamming the site with misinformation.
    Suddenly rape is everywhere and the database is polluted.

    *for the internet

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I'm skeptical by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I could easily be wrong but I can't recall an instance of /b/ misusing a worthwhile system like the Haiti or snowmageddon applications.

    2. Re:I'm skeptical by deniable · · Score: 3, Funny

      /b/, American Media, easy to confuse the two, I guess.

    3. Re:I'm skeptical by Jeff-reyy · · Score: 1

      This is also explains the current state of America's democracy.

    4. Re:I'm skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Open platforms are built on a trust model that can be easily broken by a small* group of motivated individuals.
      So just wait until /b/tards decide to get their lulz by spamming the site with misinformation.
      Suddenly rape is everywhere and the database is polluted.

      *for the internet

      Lessons learned from previous deployments have led to work on this: http://swift.ushahidi.com/ - a filter and verification system. It's still in its very early stages though.

    5. Re:I'm skeptical by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could easily be wrong but I can't recall an instance of /b/ misusing a worthwhile system like the Haiti or snowmageddon applications.

      I can't think of any off the top of my head either (which isn't to say that no trolling happened).

      But to expand on my original statement, if this system ever becomes widespread like 911/999/119/other emergency number, then it's going to attract the pranksters, cranks, and time wasters that every emergency system has to deal with... Except for one major difference: there will be almost no consequences for frakking with the system.

      Replace "pranksters" with "government organization" and you can easily see how this could be misused as a means for pyschological operations (rape and looters everywhere!) or to misdirect rescue resources.

      The model requires trust and it isn't much of a stretch to imagine how that trust could get misused.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:I'm skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even if that does not happen, people are biased. They'll very easily rate their own family's situation with an excessive rating, just to get help earlier. You can't expect objectivity from the people themselves...

      In order to get objective information, rather than just a flood of semi-garbage, you'd need to let authenticated impartial people confirm individual reports, or demand photographs or videos attached to each report. This should be very essential for helping those most in need first. Also, if we're thinking about missions such as Haiti with a lot of seperate groups working, I guess it would be important to display who amongst authenticated users is taking care of what incident...

    7. Re:I'm skeptical by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      There are no lulz to be had in messing with an emergency management system. Now if Twilight fangirls set up an instance to help them stalk Robert Pattison (sp?) it would be a different story.

      You should be worried about good ol' fashioned outlaws abusing the system - pay no attention to the looting, look at all the FIRE over there! Oh and rape over here! Oh and other looting all over the place!

      Obviously some kind of reputation + confirmation system should be used to help deal with this.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:I'm skeptical by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound like a /b/tards type attack. They normally target assholes. I could see them posting 1000's of rapes at Tom Cruises house or something, but I really don't think they would pick on Haiti. Now New Orleans that might be a different story. When you have a 300lb person complaining they are starving and haven't eaten in 2 hours since the storm, that is a more appropriate target. /b/tards are malicious in a good way. Kinda like Denis Leary in Demolition Man.

  13. Example post: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (rickroll)

  14. Useful by LingNoi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can see this being quite useful when the inevitable zombie / robot invasions happen.

  15. communication lines down by POds · · Score: 1

    What happens when communication lines are down? I assume they just fall back to first principles?

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  16. It never takes them long to adapt.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see the map now...

    o - Help, emergency, need water here

    o - Coke! The drink that refreshes. Just $1 a can!

    o - Looting at this location!

    o - Grubb, cheap security services!

  17. Ushahidi was centrally involved by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I head the digital department at a nonprofit at the heart of the Haiti earthquake relief effort. The moment the earthquake hit I remembered reading about Ushahidi last year on the African tech blog White African written by Erik Hersman, one of the co-founders of the crisis-mapping tool. At the time I thought it might be an interesting way to source stories from our many staff on the ground in Africa, South America, and other places where internet coverage might be sparse but where cell coverage was robust. Spoke to them once, but didn't follow up on it further at the time.

    The moment the news came out about Port-au-Prince, I called Erik up to ask if they could set up an instance to help coordinate first responders and disaster relief; he and they were, and even had a team of Creole-speaking volunteers to handle incoming reports and translate back and forth from English. Watching reports pop up on the map from people who were texting SOS'es from inside collapsed buildings, the hair stood up on the back of my neck because I was seeing something altogether new, different, and important.

    Then reports started appearing from friends and relatives abroad, looking for loved ones who had been staying in the Hotel Montana and other major hotels for foreigners, or from expat Haitians desperate for news of their families back home. 5 days out from the event I participated on conference calls with the US State Department, Whitehouse, Red Cross, USAID, and UN Logistics Cluster and realized Ushahidi had the best actionable intelligence, bar none, and that all the other agencies had gravitated toward using it accordingly. They shared stories of the US Marines stationed on the USS Bataan anchored off Port-au-Prince begging the Pentagon for more satellite bandwidth so they could load the graphics properly, because they were scrambling missions to dig out people trapped in the rubble.

    10 days out the folks at Ushahidi got hold of the owner of Haiti's cellular provider, Digicel, and he gave them the ability to push SMS back out to Haitian subscribers with official, verified locations where people could get medical attention, food, water, shelter, etc. It was incredible.

    It's not often you witness something game-changing in action, but this was such a moment, and the tool was saving lives.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:Ushahidi was centrally involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I head the digital department at a nonprofit at the heart of the Haiti earthquake relief effort. The moment the earthquake hit I remembered reading about Ushahidi last year on the African tech blog White African written by Erik Hersman, one of the co-founders of the crisis-mapping tool. At the time I thought it might be an interesting way to source stories from our many staff on the ground in Africa, South America, and other places where internet coverage might be sparse but where cell coverage was robust. Spoke to them once, but didn't follow up on it further at the time.

      The moment the news came out about Port-au-Prince, I called Erik up to ask if they could set up an instance to help coordinate first responders and disaster relief; he and they were, and even had a team of Creole-speaking volunteers to handle incoming reports and translate back and forth from English. Watching reports pop up on the map from people who were texting SOS'es from inside collapsed buildings, the hair stood up on the back of my neck because I was seeing something altogether new, different, and important.

      Then reports started appearing from friends and relatives abroad, looking for loved ones who had been staying in the Hotel Montana and other major hotels for foreigners, or from expat Haitians desperate for news of their families back home. 5 days out from the event I participated on conference calls with the US State Department, Whitehouse, Red Cross, USAID, and UN Logistics Cluster and realized Ushahidi had the best actionable intelligence, bar none, and that all the other agencies had gravitated toward using it accordingly. They shared stories of the US Marines stationed on the USS Bataan anchored off Port-au-Prince begging the Pentagon for more satellite bandwidth so they could load the graphics properly, because they were scrambling missions to dig out people trapped in the rubble.

      10 days out the folks at Ushahidi got hold of the owner of Haiti's cellular provider, Digicel, and he gave them the ability to push SMS back out to Haitian subscribers with official, verified locations where people could get medical attention, food, water, shelter, etc. It was incredible.

      It's not often you witness something game-changing in action, but this was such a moment, and the tool was saving lives.

      UN Logistics Cluster Info Mgmt never heard about it.

  18. add some meta-data and make it powerful by ThinkOfaNumber · · Score: 1

    This is a really interesting concept. Not only from the demanding perspective (eg earthquake, blizzard) but think of the planning possibilities.

    If you add some metadata about the input (eg. a snow blocked road would be a requirement for clearance, and a snow plough would be a method of clearing) and a higher level system could start to organise resources accordingly, with or without human intervention.

    Of course, a "humanitarian crisis" would have human involvement anyway, but think about traffic for example. Cars could send their current speed and location to a network that redistributed traffic in peak hour. This is more than just traffic avoidance, it's highway load balancing...

    There are doubtless many more opportunities!

  19. Hmm... by MICHICAUST · · Score: 1

    If this is "becoming a hero of the Haitian and Chilean earthquakes" - is this good or bad for the people affected by these quakes?!?

  20. Why /b/tards? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Legitimate criminals and psychos will LOVE this.

    "OMG! There is looting and raping and pillaging and war and famine and AIDS and cats raining from the sky OVER THERE! Quick, everyone, run to help and block police and news channels with calls - while we rob this bank over here. Then, we will create another "alert" for our getaway."

    Just imagine if Joker had access to this.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Why /b/tards? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Even worse, imagine if instead of needing a fancy web browser or text messaging cellphone, it had an audio interface you could just talk to, maybe over a phone. And instead of texting 40404 you called a shorter number, like maybe 911, in this post 9/11 world that sounds like a good number for crisis reports. Then instead of distributing the map as a pic on the internet, you had someone read the locations and activities over a radio, that anyone could listen to with a "scanner".

      As far as criminal applications go, I'm totally unimpressed. They've got better tools right now, that they don't use.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  21. crowd sourced traffic data apps by dyshexic · · Score: 1

    crowd source traffic data seems an obvious use anybody interested in writing iphone/android/s60 apps that give you a press to send SMS "big red button" to inform of being stuck in traffic? it would have significant advantages over existing fixed point traffic data and would link very usefully into OSM map based tools. Could someone cross-post this idea into the OSM talk space and/or on cloud made? (that someone might be me)

  22. Evangelist.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe some of you are a bit dumb, but the controversial connotations in some localities of this term are pretty obvious.

    Sometimes US companies get all bogged down with the language that seems to be common currency in the US (I cringed in horror durin the infamous Bush speech going in a "crussade").

    Advocate is culturaly neutral and appropraite for a company with global reach.

  23. Ushahidi also means "martyrdom" by Theatetus · · Score: 1

    Just as a warning.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
  24. I saw it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am with Linus on this one
    Linus is right
    The man makes sense
    He is absolutely correct on this one

  25. Thanks for publishing this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's important for information on resources like Ushahidi to be publicized.

  26. also check out sahana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sahana is another fine bit of kit.

    "Sahana is a Free and Open Source Disaster Management system. It is a web based collaboration tool that addresses the common coordination problems during a disaster from finding missing people, managing aid, managing volunteers, tracking camps effectively between Government groups, the civil society (NGOs) and the victims themselves."

    http://www.sahanafoundation.org/

    volunteer coders welcome!

  27. What is really cool about this software... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    ...is that is was born in Africa, under dire circumstances regarding connectivity and developer skills. A look at the PHP code, however, would never make you suspect this. RESPECT.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  28. Could you instead... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...make a simple script that would do all that, with the system that you propose?
    With various voices (IPs), coming from various addresses (geolocation), with varying but similar descriptions of the same situation?

    You know... like it was actually coming from hundreds of people in dire need of assistance.
    Or would you just hire hundreds of actors to do all that dialing and talking over that radio-thing you mention?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens