Slashdot Mirror


Finland To Try Scanning Snail Mail

will_die writes "In an effort to cut carbon emissions and reduce costs, Finland's postal company, Itella, has begun a pilot program wherein snail-mail letters are converted into PDFs and made viewable online by their addressees, instead or in advance of physical delivery. The effort is volunteer only — a little over 100 people and around 20 business as of last month — but it has already sparked concerns in Finland about privacy and government overreach. The volunteers will have images of all their letters viewable on a computer or phone. The postman will still arrive twice a week to deliver the scanned letters, as well as any packages or attachments. Additionally, the postal service will filter out junk mail."

152 comments

  1. Kind of like something that already exists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... but no one cares. (since it's too long to title as such.)

    This seems like Zumbox on crack.

    While the idea of receiving mail digitally has some appeal to me, forcing everyone to receive mail originally sent in a non-digital format as a set of 1s and 0s is... not quite the best idea.

    I wouldn't mind receiving my electric, water, and cable bill as a digital sending each month (and I already do via email), but certain things (bills from collections agencies come to mind) are things that I, and ONLY I need to see.

    Now, with something like this, if the ability to respond electronically to the mail were there and available to us, even if there's some sort of digital postage (at a reduced cost, preferably, if we choose to not send a dead tree copy of the same letter) that was needed, maybe it would start to appeal to more.

    Best case for that would be when my doctor sends me paperwork to fill out before I come in. If I can log into a secure server, receive the forms, type in the data (memo: we need to have something other than Adobe for forms, ffs. Plain old HTML forms should be fine), and submit that electronically...
    If the doctor needs a dead tree version at that point, they can print it.

    1. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by datapharmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words, avoiding the mail system altogether, which shows that the postal system is slowly becoming antiquated. This program is just a dying industry trying to remain relevant.

      --
      Get a web developer
    2. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe you are amazingly shortsighted that you think postal systems are irrelevant. Can you think of any other completely effective way to physically deliver large quantities of physical items to households covering a large geographical area, without the expense of storefronts etc?

      I quite disagree that postal systems are dieing - I believe that in this day of internet shopping postal systems are becoming far more widely utilized than ever.

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    3. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you think of any other completely effective way to physically deliver large quantities of physical items to households covering a large geographical area, without the expense of storefronts etc?

      Ocado seem to do it well in the UK (www.ocado.com)

    4. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Obligatory quote: I think you're severely underestimating the bandwidth of a 747 full of BluRay discs.

      Other than that, I like to receive some mail in pre-printed, signed and ready-to-archive-forever version. Preferably when larger sums of money is involved.

      And I like the peace of mind knowing that no ECHELON or whatever read my mail. GPG-encrypted email would work, but I can't even get my coworkers to use that, let alone mom and grandma.

      Until Big Government is cut back far enough to actually respect email privacy as good as snail mail, I'm counting on the dead tree envelope. Both are protected by the constitution, but somehow They only care about paper security.

    5. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between a postal system and a package delivery system. Postal delivery is dying, but package delivery is another story. FedEx and UPS don't do postal delivery. IIRC, it is technically illegal for them to handle mail. That is protected for the subsidized USPS. They will still send a single sheet of paper if you want (like resumes/legal paperwork that has to be there by 4pm the next day) but they handle it as a package and charge way more than USPS would.

    6. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      The USPS is completely self-sustaining and has been since the 1980s (although back then, yes, it was a money hole). It receives no funding from taxes.

      I would say USPS is not subsidized, except that you are right about the monopoly on letter post. The law itself is interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Express_Statutes

      From my experience and tales from others, USPS is far superior to Canada's privatized post, so I am suspicious about the social value of privatizing the mail.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    7. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A series of Pneumatic tubes :-)

    8. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by hab136 · · Score: 1

      It's actually like Earth Class Mail, which scans your mail, and has a government postal service outsource program. Notably, they do this for Swiss Post.

      After reading Zumbox's site, I'm still trying to figure out why I would open an account there. It seems not only do I have to sign up for it, all my service providers do too. If my electric company is too dumb to offer e-bills, why would they offer this?

    9. Re:Kind of like something that already exists... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      UPS/FedEx? That's their business. The USPS (and a lot of other postal systems throughout the world) has been putting more emphasis on their 'added services' like package shipping and money transfers to adjust for the diminishing returns of snail mail delivery. I actually get mad when people send me snail mail letters on dead tree - it's bad for the environment and e-mail is a lot simpler and easier.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  2. ORLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    april fools...

    1. Re:ORLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jTlosv9uqU7jQUMPogpOKouzppMA

      It's even in the link! April Fools' Professional.

    2. Re:ORLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was on Finnish news media before April Fools, and the trial begins in few weeks in a small village.

    3. Re:ORLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut carbon emissions of printing on paper and mailing it. Instead keep a mainframe or two online, so that when you fire up your quad core computer and 25" monitor to read your mail, you'll have less of a carbon footprint. Of course, you may print out some of the mail, to be able to read some outside, or on the train.

    4. Re:ORLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      april fools...

      I'm feeling stupid when typing this but did you happen to look at the date when blurting that out?

  3. Why not? by Animats · · Score: 1

    Why not? What comes in by snail mail today?

    1. Bills from companies that don't handle online billing.
    2. Junk mail.

    And they're filtering out the junk mail!

    1. Re:Why not? by rotide · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if you get a birthday card with money in it? Who is to say you didn't get two 20's in that letter. The postal service was only able to locate one of those!

      Or, say it's a private letter about financial information and now they have all your account information, oh and all your other personally identifiable information was in other letters that week so your identity is safe with you, and the person that opened all your mail.

      It's just not a good idea in the long run. Maybe as an opt-in service for those who _know_ what is/isn't showing up in snail mail?

    2. Re:Why not? by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      How are they going to transmit those crappy Discover credit card offers with the fake and completely unshreddable plastic credit card in it?! Oh noes!!

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    3. Re:Why not? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I've gotten one piece of non-junk mail in the last year. I'll happily tell people not to send money in exchange for cutting off the junk. Who the hell mails cash instead of a check anyway?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Why not? by Itninja · · Score: 1

      3. Letters from Grandparents
      4. Checks
      5. Legally binding documents (i.e titles, deeds, contracts)

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    5. Re:Why not? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Bills from companies that you don't trust to handle online billing.

      FTFY.

      Bills in the mail aren't exclusively from companies that don't handle online billing. Some of us choose to continue with paper versions of bills because we do not trust putting our credit card and/or bank account information into commonly used, high profile websites on a monthly basis.

    6. Re:Why not? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      and completely unshreddable plastic credit card in it

      You need a better shredder. And no, no business grade. $40 at OfficeMax, and it eats cred cards, CD's, anything. I don't even open the junk mail..just shove the whole envelope in.

    7. Re:Why not? by Zephiris · · Score: 1

      Grandmothers. Grandpas. Aunts. Uncles. The people who aren't close enough to you to care, and not with-it enough to do robust things like check, credit transfer, or god-forbid, an actual thoughtful gift. ^^;

      --

      "A Goddess rarely smiles for she is forced by others to be an island unto herself." - Zephiris
    8. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my dope come by snail mail

    9. Re:Why not? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Oh I think money is plenty thoughtful- they're thoughtful enough to let me get something I want, rather than guessing wrong. But hasn't the post office warned people for decades not to send cash by mail?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    10. Re:Why not? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Who is to say you didn't get two 20's in that letter.

      Don't everyone's grandparents put steganographic checksums for enclosed money in the text of their letter? :P

    11. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Because it's stupid. If it's urgent, it isn't sent just by snail mail. If it's important to have the paper (real signatures, etc.), the scanned version doesn't suffice. Consequently they have to deliver the paper version anyway (which they do), but then the sender could just send a PDF by email in advance and the paper version by snail mail, and thereby completely avoid third party involvement. The privacy problem involves two sides: The recipient can agree to the procedure, but how is the sender's privacy preserved? Another new problem: What if the scan arrives and the snail mail with an important signature is lost en-route?

    12. Re:Why not? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Its no more likely to happen with it being done this way than it currently is.

      Its really not hard to open an envelope, fuck with the contents, and reseal it without anyone noticing after the fact.

      The fact that the places that are going to be doing this are most certainly monitored to all hell and back like most postal sorting facilities already are.

      You are being paranoid about a problem that would already exist if it were actually going to be a problem.

      Like it or not, this is the way things are going. The transition is going to happen and when it does there are going to be initial issues that need to be worked out, but thats not an excuse for not doing it.

      The pony express riders could read your mail and steal your money too, far easier than now where most of the work is done by machines rather than hands on by people ... but it was still a good thing to have wasn't it?

      People have always had their hands on your mail and had this ability. They've had scanners for years that would make it easy to spot money in something and to stick that one aside. Hell, a hand held high power UV light in your palm being held over the envelopes will get you enough of a reflection to detect the plastic strip in american bills so you only have to open the ones with money in them, making it pretty much identical to this in every way. If you trust your mailman, this is no different, he can already do this if he wants to.

      Fortunately, most people find it easier to just do their job than to try and scam people via the mail and end up in a federal prison ... at least here in the states. I doubt its really that much different in Finland.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    13. Re:Why not? by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      And if you get a birthday card with money in it? Who is to say you didn't get two 20's in that letter. The postal service was only able to locate one of those!

      RTFA. It says the system is voluntary. If you send money in your birthday card (and it is never a good idea to send cash in the mail), then don't volunteer to have that piece of mail scanned!

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    14. Re:Why not? by mattack2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Btw, you can still pay these paper bills online for free. I pay the small part of my dentist bill that insurance doesn't pay (have gone there forever, should find in network dentist) online. Plus, anybody you mail a check to has all of the info to get money out of your account.

    15. Re:Why not? by Dthief · · Score: 1

      Sending money via the mail system is not legal (in the US, maybe it is in Finland,...and I'm sure people will jump on me if I'm wrong). And if you read the article it IS and opt-in only program, they aren't forcing anyone to do it.

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    16. Re:Why not? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who is to say you didn't get two 20's in that letter.

      Don't everyone's grandparents put steganographic checksums for enclosed money in the text of their letter? :P

      Who's your Grandfather? Alan Turing?

      Oh wait...

    17. Re:Why not? by stonedcat · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but you're dead wrong.
      While it is a bad idea to send cash through the mail in the US it is in no way illegal.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    18. Re:Why not? by rotide · · Score: 1

      Definitely wrong. Case in point, when I got the letter from Nielson (sp?) for tv ratings they sent me a total of 5 $1 bills through snail mail.

    19. Re:Why not? by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "RTFA. It says the system is voluntary. If you send money in your birthday card (and it is never a good idea to send cash in the mail), then don't volunteer to have that piece of mail scanned!"

      RTFA yourself. The system is currently voluntary for the recipient, for whom all of their mail will be scanned. It's neither (1) optable by the sender, nor (2) optable per piece of mail. On top of all that, this is a test for a universal (presumably non-optable) rollout.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    20. Re:Why not? by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      RTFA yourself. The system is currently voluntary for the recipient, for whom all of their mail will be scanned.

      Well, it's the recipient who would be out the twenty bucks, so I think my point still stands.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    21. Re:Why not? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Some of us choose to continue with paper versions of bills because we do not trust putting our credit card and/or bank account information into commonly used, high profile websites on a monthly basis.

      Yet you choose to send paper checks through the mail that have your name, address, and bank routing/account number on them and are handled by god knows who many people along the way (postal employees, customer service reps accepting the payment at the destination, etc). Interesting. I think I'll stick to trusting the online method.

    22. Re:Why not? by weicco · · Score: 1

      You are not supposed to send money over mail in Finland. Post's own web pages says that it is forbidden. There's no law about it though (in Finland we have laws about almost everything!)

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
  4. no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess everyone has to GPG and OCR their private letters now ...

  5. Sounds fine to me by monoi · · Score: 1

    With the exception of contracts and suchlike (which would obviously be outside this scheme), I can't think of anything sensitive that I receive by snail mail these days.

    Everything I really care about the security of (bank statements, personal messages etc) comes over the web, via TLS.

    1. Re:Sounds fine to me by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I can't think of anything sensitive that I receive by snail mail these days.

      Dear So-and-so,
      The results of your AIDS/STD tests are in.
      Please contact us for a follow-up appointment ASAP.
      Sincerely,
      Your Doctor.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  6. 1 day ago by xerent_sweden · · Score: 1

    Posted 1 day ago, is this a late april fools joke?

    1. Re:1 day ago by Orbijx · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem so. Following a few links through the article, they genuinely appear to have a site set up for receiving digital mail.

      Requires either a user/pass set, or a (government issued? possibly as part of the ID?) smartcard read by the site to get logged in.

      I'm nowhere near there, so I lack a user/pass or ID for login, but it seems to be legit.

      --
      One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.
    2. Re:1 day ago by Orbijx · · Score: 1

      A derp-a-derp-derp.
      Would help if I actually linked what I discovered.

      From TFA, I followed a link over to a blog at the Telegraph that contained links to the Netposti interface (link set to english. På svenska, Suomeksi are options for .fi, .se).

      What shows up after logging in, I have to leave to someone who actually has a login for the service. It'd be an expensive, expensive trip overseas just for me to get an answer (passport, plane, time off from work, sedatives, rental vehicle, ...), so I'll leave it to someone who might just be able to walk down the road and get set up.

      --
      One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.
    3. Re:1 day ago by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1
      AFAIK this scanning thing is a trial only for a small community. At least for now. But it's not April Fools, that's for sure.

      Finnish postal service already provides a service for companies, institutions, etc. to send mail electronically to the postal service, who print out the stuff and deliver the snail mail to the end clients. This probably does save a bunch of CO2, and makes life easier for said companies.

      NetPosti you refer to is an interface for receiving such mail electronically, opting out of the snail mail part altogether. Possibly the scanning service uses the same interface.

      The scanning service mostly sounds insane to me, but I could imagine someone already using NetPosti wanting to archive everything there. (Like images of the 20 euros your grandma sent you. Eh.) I guess the people would still receive the snail mail, but maybe in batches once or twice a week instead of every weekday.

    4. Re:1 day ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finland is a small community. It works this way, since the biggest tech campus in nordic countries is in Finland things get tested there because of quite uniform demographic.

      Then the EU wide testing goes to whole Finland for same reason. Finland has a very tiny population base that's very novelty friendly in general. So the thing that would cause a riot in France would just cause Finns to shake their heads 2 seconds and go about with their business as usual.

      There is a joke about a French president asking a Finnish MP, you call this a demonstration, happens every Friday at home. Where the Finnish MP comments "You don't understand, last time this happened it ended in the Russian empire to collapsing"

  7. I would prefer this... by the1337g33k · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If I could get my actual mail scanned and delivered by e-mail that would be awesome. There are some bills I have that don't have online pay functions yet, and regardless of privacy (since I already sold it to google a while back) this would actually be more private and secure then actually having it delivered. My mail gets stolen from time to time. (yes, I RTFA and I know they still deliver the scanned messages too)

  8. Twice a week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The postman will still arrive twice a week to deliver the scanned letters, as well as any packages or attachments.

    Twice a week? Post is delivered daily here..
    If it was only delivered twice a week it would be even more useless!

    1. Re:Twice a week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They deliver the original letters (which were scanned and emailed earlier in the week) twice weekly. He's not coming round twice a week to hand you a CD or something, and I presume if you're not in this pilot you still get your mail daily as before.

      I just don't see the point -- the only reason I'd ever hard-mail someone something is if I wanted a reasonable level of privacy for non-criminal matters.* Since I want privacy, but it's not criminal, presumably it's something that would be embarrassing or harmful, hence the protection that they'd (no doubt) get fired if they kept a _copy_ does me little good -- they're still relatively free to gossip about it, since there's evidence for that.

      * If it were something criminal? Hard-copies are evil, since they _will_ show up in court. Use encryption for that, and real-time communications (IM, or better VoIP) so there's no cached copies generated as part of the mailing process. Fortunately I don't _do_ anything more criminal than light copyright infringement, but us geeks have to consider wierd scenarios.

      Not that that's a bad thing in the long run -- maybe people would just move to encrypted email for everything, the government could eventually shut down the letter side of the postal service, and just haul packages (The USPS, of course, would get their butt handed to them by Fedex and UPS in this scenario, but maybe the Finnish post is more efficient.)

  9. Finland has geographic issues by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Finland is really a very small country population-wise, but decently sized in landmass. Under 6M people in the 8th largest country in Europe. This has to make mail distribution very expensive. Add in the weather (I've been to northern Finland in February- well below 0 with snow banks over your head) and I can see why they'd want to minimize or eliminate physical delivery. Its barely economical in the US, I can't see how it could be there.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:Finland has geographic issues by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      How does Norway manage 6 days of delivery then? The mountains in the middle certainly haven't impacted the postal service.

    2. Re:Finland has geographic issues by xerent_sweden · · Score: 1

      Probably the same way Sweden deals with it. With a series of tube... I mean, with a truck. There used to be a train going from north to south and back again all day long but it turned out that having trucks was more profitable. Strange.

    3. Re:Finland has geographic issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its barely economical in the US, I can't see how it could be there.

      Isn’t snail-mail, you know, paid for? I mean, if it’s hard to deliver just, you know, raise the price...

    4. Re:Finland has geographic issues by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because raising the price causes the demand for mail to go down. Perhaps enough so that you actually make less money than you would at the original price. Which when you have high fixed costs in employees and post offices or the startup cost is the driving factor in cost rather than the marginal cost of production, can actually mean you lose money by raising prices. Business can be weird. Like I said, mail is barely profitable in the US, and it only remains so do to high quantities of junk mail. In the past the post office has been subsidized by Congress. I can't imagine its profitable anywhere in Scandanavia.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:Finland has geographic issues by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      Because raising the price causes the demand for mail to go down

      Econfag here, ready to nitpick. Saying "demand goes down" implies that nobody wants mail delivery anymore, at any price. What you mean is that less is demanded at the higher price than the current price.

      Like you say, raising prices can easily lead to less profit. But, how much more or less profit you make depends on the shape of the demand curve for mail delivery, not whether or not you have high variable costs or sunk costs. (Assuming you are still covering your marginal costs.) I'd suspect that the demand for mail delivery is rather inelastic; a slight bump in prices probably wouldn't cause people to boycott package delivery.

      And if it's already unprofitable in Scandinavia, none of it matters anyway. If profit isn't the primary reason to provide mail delivery, the post office won't be disbanded because it was slightly less profitable this year than last.

      Other than that, you have a point. You can't just ratchet up prices to a million dollars a package because you want to save money by "delivering" only scanned mail.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    6. Re:Finland has geographic issues by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      8th largest country in Europe

      Well okay but thats not very big by world standards.

    7. Re:Finland has geographic issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8th largest country in Europe

      Well okay but thats not very big by world standards.

      It's scarcely populated, even by world standards.

    8. Re:Finland has geographic issues by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      8th largest country in Europe

      Well okay but thats not very big by world standards.

      It's scarcely populated, even by world standards.

      It has seven or eight times the population density of Australia and nowhere near the issues of distance which we face in au.

    9. Re:Finland has geographic issues by drolli · · Score: 1

      Because Norway if fucking rich by selling their gas/oil.

    10. Re:Finland has geographic issues by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Check out Canada then... We've got a slightly higher density compared to Australia, but we have COLD winter (-20C isn't uncommon). Postal delivery at those temperatures isn't enjoyable at all.

    11. Re:Finland has geographic issues by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Well we have HOT (+60C isn't uncommon) and I have always felt that its easier to stay warm in the cold than cool in the heat but one thing we should agree on is that 1000km in the back country in AU or CA will be harder than 100km in the back country in Finland.

    12. Re:Finland has geographic issues by the_womble · · Score: 1

      8th largest country in Europe

      Well okay but thats not very big by world standards.

      A greater land area than Malaysia or the Philippines and nearly as big as Japan or the Congo is small by world standards.

      Its not "very big" by world of Europeans standards, the point is that it has a small population relative to its size. Its population density is similar to that of New Zealand or Sudan. There are very few European or Asian countries with lower population densities, and its population density is much lower than India, or China or almost all other big countries (apart from Russia), so it is very lightly populated by world standards.

    13. Re:Finland has geographic issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway has oil and gas and that makes the country very rich, as in they can afford to deliver the mail six days a week through the mountains (yes they have tunneled through most of their mountains long ago). Everything in Norway is also at least 1,5 times as expensive as in Finland.

    14. Re:Finland has geographic issues by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Finland has a lot of land that it's basically uninhabitable. Yes, Australia has lots of desert, but there your big problem is lack of water, not that it's basically impossible to build infrastructure there. Large areas of Finland are basically swampland because it's so wet.

      There's no way to build roads, houses, or any kind of infrastructure on it due to the extreme ranges in temperature. Anything built on it would basically either sink, or the yearly rounds of freezing and thawing that cause massive ground expansion and contraction due to ice formation and ice melt, would tear anything built on it apart.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    15. Re:Finland has geographic issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an unfeasible idea to raise prices. If you introduce pricing that makes even the hardest domestic locations profitable, it would be extremely high when compared to what people accept as price for delivery between two cities. And since the pricing system already requires people to take into account the weight of letters and how speedy delivery they want, it would simply be too complicated, if they had to look at the location more closely than the country it's sent to or whether it's domestic. Nobody would bother with a list of every tiny village. Thus some deliveries just aren't profitable but it's no different than e.g. some "all you can eat" prices. Some customers aren't profitable to serve but to make it more appealing for the majority, you have to accept that.

    16. Re:Finland has geographic issues by shentino · · Score: 1

      Reliable postal service FOR ALL ADDRESSES is a public good.

      I think it's entirely appropriate for the government to be in charge of it.

  10. If I wanted to send a PDF, I would have by kg8484 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I call bull on the "effort to cut carbon emissions" - this is purely about the costs and the carbon emissions are a byproduct (gas costs money). When I send a letter, I mean to send a letter. Not an electronic document. Now, this does not happen very often, so usually, I do communicate via email. I don't need the post office tampering with the mail. Furthermore:

    "This (secure digital mailbox) is totally different from e-mail. It is comparable to web banking," said Tommi Tikka, development director at state-owned Itella, which runs the Nordic country's postal system.

    So people's mail is stored on some server, probably totally unencrypted and requiring only a login to get in. Cue the hacking and government abuse - I can imagine it now; "We don't need a warrant, it's already in this database. People have no expectation of privacy when sending letters." (IANAL - or rather, "I Am Not A Finnish Lawyer" and really have no ideas of the laws in that country).

    Luckily, this is all on a volunteer basis (for now), and I think from a cost-cutting perspective, it does make sense to reduce the number of deliveries by postman for non-express mail to twice a week since the volume of mail has probably shrunk (I have no statistics for this, solely based on personal experience).

  11. Sparked concerns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    already sparked concerns

    Has it? Really? Don't `they' publish the annual income of every citizen on-line in Finland, as a matter of public record? Or is that some other European whitebread workers paradise? Either way I seriously doubt there are any actual fins concerned about this.

  12. Junk Mail by Itninja · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Political Dissident: Hey, I sent out my anti-government newsletter to 1000 people. But only a few got it. What gives?
    Government: I guess it was mis-tagged as junk mail. Our bad. Sorry it's already been deleted. No, we don't back up junk mail.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Junk Mail by blair1q · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The government doesn't interfere with such things.

      They just log them, copy them, pass the copy along to the analysts, and deliver the mail, so as not to arouse the suspicions of people who are already paranoid.

      (Kids, if you think there's any reason in the world for the US Government to be running a delivery service, other than that it simplifies intelligence gathering immensely, then you probably didn't go to business school.)

    2. Re:Junk Mail by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      First way to tell if its junk mail: does it say 'resident' (or whatever your language happens to be) in the addressee? Yes? Its junk.

      No? Maybe junk, maybe not.

      If you just throw out the ones with the wrong addressee name for the address or ones that say 'current resident' or variations on that then you've already cut down on 99.9% of the problem with junk mail.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Junk Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that Benjamin Franklin, he was a wily one... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postal_Service#History. In addition to scientist, inventor, statesman, and first postmaster general, we can now all safely add Super Spy.

    4. Re:Junk Mail by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Actually, the real problem with junk mail (in the US at least) is that it's the largest source of revenue for the USPS (over 50% of volume!) So it's actually in their interest to keep allowing the horribly wasteful and inefficient practice.

    5. Re:Junk Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does it say 'resident' (or whatever your language happens to be) in the addressee? Yes? Its junk.

      Or it might be a voter registration form. Or notification of a planning application to build an abattoir next door to your house; or a new railway over your house. I'll continue to take the "resident" mail thanks.

    6. Re:Junk Mail by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      In the US "junk mail" PAYS FOR THE POST OFFICE DAMMIT. It pays. It pays. It damn well fucking pays. It is one of the few reasons rural post offices can remain open.

      Couple that with the BTU's that marketers send and it is a double economic whammy!

      In one months time I get enough 'junk mail' that is safely burnable to lower my heating bill about $30. Eh carbon schmarben.

      Some of it is perfect for the masking needed for electrolytic etching of brass and the masking needed for other metals.

      What is not safely burnable can be in some way recycled or has other uses. There's a process that can turn newsprint to micarta like laminate which is durable and other than the paper is non-toxic. It's final toxicity is dependent on the paper.

      I know it's a hideous thought but you can get more junk mail.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    7. Re:Junk Mail by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The stories of a toad like Franklin being a "ladies man" while in France mirror the stories of Henry Kissinger flying hotties on dates to Paris, which was later admitted to be a cover for Kissinger attending secret peace talks there with the Viet Namese.

      So, while your sarcastic reply is not likely to be true, it's also not impossible.

      Franklin didn't invent the postal service, and Postmaster General is titular gloss, at best.

      Just as those who vote control elections, those who deliver the mail control information.

      And none of this changes the fact that there's no good reason for the government to be directly involved in the system in any way other than to tax and regulate it as for other businesses, except that it gives the government temporary, secluded possession of the materials being delivered. And the only reasons for wanting to have that capability are to inspect the content of the mail, or to covertly transport mail you don't want anyone else to track.

  13. V-Mail (victory mail) by Duradin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Old idea, new implementation.

    PDFs instead of film negatives.

    1. Re:V-Mail (victory mail) by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Yea, except the general public can actually do something with PDFs, where as film negatives are really a pain in the ass to deal with for this purpose.

      True, old idea, new implementation, but its definitely an improvement over the last one.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:V-Mail (victory mail) by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yea, except the general public can actually do something with PDFs, where as film negatives are really a pain in the ass to deal with for this purpose.

      Especially if you want them to be really private.

    3. Re:V-Mail (victory mail) by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      film negatives are really a pain in the ass to deal with for this purpose.

      Not so bad when you're set up to process it in bulk. The recipient never got the microfilm negative, of course; he got a print of the image produced by the V-Mail facility. The size was still reduced by 60%, though.

    4. Re:V-Mail (victory mail) by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Especially if you want them to be really private.

      There was no privacy in V-Mail, of course. It was wartime, and you were writing to troops in the field (or they were writing to you). Every V-Mail was read and censored before being microfilmed; everybody was very aware this was the case.

  14. You Insensitive Clod. . . by milonssecretsn · · Score: 0

    "all their letters viewable on a computer or phone"

    I only have a dial-tone phone. How am I supposed to view my letters?

    --
    Hey, I was only kidding. You don't have to MOD me "Troll" . . . again . . . .
  15. no junk mail? by paulcone · · Score: 1

    I thought the postal service MADE money from junk mail?

    1. Re: no junk mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they make money to remove junk mail. And will make extra money for AdvertisePlus that by pass junk mail removal. just like the caller id scam.

    2. Re: no junk mail? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Lots and lots and lots of money.

      The one service in the U.S. that will do this mail culling for you charges $19.95 per month for it. And then on top of that, if you actually want something scanned, they charge per-piece fees. And the best one is, if you want them to dispose of the paper copies in a recycling bin it's free, but if you want them to shred the paper copies it's an extra $4.95/month...so if you're doing this to make your bills all-electronic, you have to pay 25% extra or your bills (and the account numbers and other personally identifying info they contain) become the property of the local recycling center...

      So there's plenty of room for the US Postal Service to find a way to profit from charging you not to ever deliver you a piece of junk mail or a bill again.

    3. Re: no junk mail? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Depends on how many assholes like me you have to deal with.

      I have a stack of printed 'return to sender' labels laying next to my door. When I get junk mail I put it back in my mailbox with the RTS label on it.

      While thats a little nutty I admit, its better than my original plan which was to shove it down the post mans throat before lighting it on fire. At least I don't got to jail this way, and I'm pretty sure it eats into any profit they might have.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  16. Filtering.. by hallucinogen · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a Finn. I've already got a filter for spam snail mail. I wrote "Ei mainoksia, kiitos" (no adds, please) to a sticker and placed it on top of my mail slot. The only post I get is postcards from friends and relatives twice a decade or so. Everything else is already digital..

    1. Re:Filtering.. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Couldn't do that in the US. A carrier could be fired or even criminally prosecuted if he deliberately failed to deliver a piece of mail legally posted to you. It's called "interfering with the mail" and it's a Federal felony.

    2. Re:Filtering.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. and you also get religious pamphlets and pizzeria takeout menus and whatever other crap people shove there who don't work for post office.

    3. Re:Filtering.. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      That’s the wrong way around! I have “Kein Einwurf, ausser:” (“No (mail) droping, except:”) on my mailbox. With a list of exceptions below. Which is: Only normal letters, addressed to me personally. Packets have to be handed over to me personally, since they don’t fit in. Everything else (giving them to neighbors) counts as “not delivered”, and assistance of theft by the mail man.

      I hope to completely remove the mailbox in the future, and put a sign there, saying: Packets: Are to be delivered to me in person (signature-proven). Everything else: Only digitally! (Digitally signed, if needed.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Filtering.. by weicco · · Score: 1

      But now after the ParkCom trial you could change your sign to read "Mainoksista laskutetaan 50 euroa kappaleelta. Toimittamalla mainoksen hyväksyt sopimuksen." (Adds will be charged 50 euros/add. By delivering the add you have accepted this aggreement.) and start making money by receiving adds \o/

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    5. Re:Filtering.. by rihkama · · Score: 1

      That only applies to "ilmaisjakelu" (eg. distribution of "free" ads and rarely some local ad supported newspapers). Itella will deliver the ads they are distributing. It's true though that most ads come through the companies doing "ilmaisjakelu".

    6. Re:Filtering.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another Finn here to clarify, it doesn't filter actually cut out all spam, just spam that wasn't personally marked to be sent to you.

      So if the spammers would actually label it as personally to you, it'd get trough.

      But it does cut the volume of mail quite substantially so you don't need to take them out with the trash every week now once a odd month suffices.

      Also for previous asker NOBODY in Finland sends money over with mail. Thats what the banks are there for, seriously.

  17. Just found out, huh? by idji · · Score: 1

    Swiss Post and other Post Companies have been providing these types of services to corporate customers for quite a while now. It's all part of Business Process Outsourcing or adding value to your customers.

  18. Packages? by Chess+Piece+Face · · Score: 1

    Don't know about Finland, but I mostly use the mail system for packages and magazines. Wouldn't be very happy if service on those items was cut back to a couple of times per week.

    1. Re:Packages? by spatley · · Score: 1

      Really? I would happily wait 2 more days for Architectural Digest or the Economist in effort to reduce government spending and national fuel consumption. What possibly are you receiving by regular post that is day-critical?

    2. Re:Packages? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Really, because you get packages and magazines every day of the week? You must be fast, I don't think I could read 20 or so magazines every single month. You really can't wait up to ... 4 days ... to get something that comes ones a month? Would you have a embolism if the publish just shifted the mailing date back by 4 days?

      And you're sending important things you need to get right away via standard mail rather than FedEx or its equivalent? Really?

      $20 says if no one told you, you'd not notice for months.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Packages? by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1

      Don't know about Finland, but I mostly use the mail system for packages and magazines.

      There's parody on this in Finland's main paper today. "The organically grown lamb you ordered arrived as an attachment."

  19. Already in production in Portugal by wizeman · · Score: 1

    This kind of service is already implemented by the national post office in Portugal for a long time.

    It's called ViaCTT.

  20. How does it cut emissions? by Nidi62 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How are emissions cut when the letters are still delivered? Wouldn't this actually cost more energy since they have to both hand deliver the original mail and use up power scanning and posting the copies? Not to mention the added labor hours required to do so. That looks like a cost increase, not a decrease. And, if they have enough spare employees to where they can actually spend time doing this, would it not be more efficient cost-wise to either just reduce those employees' hours(or move them to part-time) or lay them off altogether?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:How does it cut emissions? by grogglefroth · · Score: 1

      Fewer deliveries, fewer vehicle miles.
       

      --
      Good, Fast, Cheap - Pick any two. - RFC 1925
    2. Re:How does it cut emissions? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If the mail is scanned at the receiving mail sorting facility, it will reduce aggregate tonnage of mail transferred to and from central sorting facilities by a lot. It won't reduce trips by much, but it should reduce fuel usage per trip, and thus reduce emission poundage. The next logical step, once the practice is dominant and hardcopy flow becomes a trickle, will be to aggregate mail from slow days, thus reducing trips, too.

      And it makes sense. I only check my mailbox once a week, sometimes twice a month. Maybe a little more frequently if I'm chain-watching the Netflix. No reason the postie should be there every day, either.

    3. Re:How does it cut emissions? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Did you miss that the mailman would only have to go to all those remote locations twice a week instead of 6 times?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  21. Privacy? The market will set the price by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

    Hey, if you want a guaranteed private mail service then you should be willing to pay more for it. If there really is that demand out there then the free market will set the price and folks who care will voluntarily comply.

  22. Why is this necessary? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We pay all our bills on line - barely any incoming bills, no outgoing checks - I have written maybe 3 checks in the last 5 years. e-mail has replaced most of our correspondence. The only thing that shows up in my mailbox is adverts and the magazines I subscribe to, and very occasionally stuff like property tax assessments and 1099s etc.

    How about the postal service let me opt out of getting junk mail delivered? I keep the garbage bin by the mailbox for a reason - only about 5% of what shows up in my mailbox actually survives the walk up the driveway to the house...

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    1. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What is a check, or a cheque? Living in Finland, I think I saw one in actual use last time in very early nineties - almost twenty years ago.

      I must say this service is largely pointless, and primarily self-promotion of almost-monopoly post office. All the actual mail I get and care about is bills - that I could, with one call, convert to fully "electronic" PDF-only service. Otherwise, I get basically nothing of value, if pizza place menus are not counted.

    2. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three checks in the last 5 years? I don't think I have seen any checks in 15 years, replaced by online banking and debet cards since then.
      I have some vague childhood memories of checks, but...

    3. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is quite useless service, especially in Finland (I'm Finn) sine 98% of our bills are electric already, and we already have filtering system for spam mail - You just place "Ei mainoksia, kiitos"- sign (No adversiting, please) next to your mailbox and you won't get any adversiting :-)

    4. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asking post office to filter junk mail is just like asking TV stations to stop showing ads. That's how they get their revenue.

    5. Re:Why is this necessary? by puhuri · · Score: 1

      What is a check, or a cheque? Living in Finland, I think I saw one in actual use last time in very early nineties - almost twenty years ago.

      Same for me, I guess I signed last cheque in 1989, since then it has been cash, debit and credit cards or electronic banking. Buyers of our apartment paid with cheque in 1999, but they were a bit strange in other ways too.

      All the actual mail I get and care about is bills - that I could, with one call, convert to fully "electronic" PDF-only service.

      And those are not ones I need to get as dead-tree print imitation. Many regular payments are based on direct payments: I get a notification email week or two in advance and I do not need to do anything to get them paid (except to make sure that there is enough money on account). If there is something wrong with those (so far none), and I want to challenge it I can remove it.

      For me that experiment would not work, because about alI physical mail I receive are on physical for a reason.

    6. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Finn i would say checks have been dead for a part of 40 years now. Ive only ever once seen a check in my life, and that was because it was way cooler than giving out a 50 marks for stupid stipends in the lower grades of school.

  23. ViaCTT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Catchy name!

  24. What Bullshit is this? If I want to send a PDF by syousef · · Score: 1

    ....I'll scan it myself and send a PDF. Volunteer only tends to turn into the way it's done very quickly if costs can be cut at all. Glad I'm not Finnish. Tell your postmaster to stop smoking weed.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  25. Not real, it was April's Fool joke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow you believe anything. It was an April's Fool joke in a local newspaper Kaleva.

    http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kaleva.fi%2Fuutiset%2Fkirjeiden-skannaus-herattaa-tunteita%2F847518&sl=fi&tl=en

    1. Re:Not real, it was April's Fool joke! by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1

      The announcement was made March 29th. It's real.

  26. You are a lucky man. Here it is the business model by fantomas · · Score: 1

    You're a lucky man, Here in the UK it's part of the national post service's business model to accept money from spammers to deliver junk mail. So we get loads of junk mail whether we like it or not. The postal workers recently went on strike because they didn't want to deliver junk mail to people but they got told by the employers they have to, and so have had to back down and accept they must deliver it if they want to keep their jobs.

  27. Seriously, not even the first word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The comments on here referring to the UNITED STATES government are amazing. I know most people don't RTFA, I know most people can't even be bothered to finish reading the summary.. but the FIRST WORD OF THE TITLE OF THE POST IS FINLAND.

    I would expect this kind of reading comprehension fail in a youtube comments section, but not Slashdot.

    1. Re:Seriously, not even the first word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The comments on here referring to the UNITED STATES government are amazing. I know most people don't RTFA, I know most people can't even be bothered to finish reading the summary.. but the FIRST WORD OF THE TITLE OF THE POST IS FINLAND.

      I would expect this kind of reading comprehension fail in a youtube comments section, but not Slashdot.

      You must be new here.

  28. You can do this in the USA and other places... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    Some full-service private mailbox facilities will do this for you to - they scan all the snail mail that arrives for you and then email the scans to you. Convenient for maintaining a mailing address if you are on the road a lot or are otherwise far away from your mailing address.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  29. ISO Email standard described this I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recall correctly, it stated that an email system should inter-operate with the physical postal delivery system in both directions. So one could write a physical letter, put an email address on the envelope, place it in the post box, the postman would collect it and the local delivery office scan in your letter, ocr it and then email it to the addressee. In the other direction, you could specify a physical street address in your email header, the system would send it to the nearest postal office to that address, who would print it out, place it in an envelope and deliver it.

  30. Not for my .... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    birthday cards, valentines, ...

  31. Nokia by pydev · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just let Nokia do it and it will be legally OK.

  32. What they should do... by Uncle+Dazza · · Score: 1

    .. is allow people to sign up for a virtual mailing address (like a PO Box number). Mail sent to that address is scanned and emailed.

    Then I could choose - I can give my virtual mailing address to utilities that still insist on sending me paper bills, and keep my actual address for 'sensitive' material.

    As someone who does personal business in 3 countries and moves relatively often, I'd love to have a service like this.

    The second phase, of course, is to interface to the mail senders as well, offering to take PDF files and the print and send them. Or if the recipient is taking scanned bills, just forward the PDF and save a tree.

    1. Re:What they should do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See swisspostbox.com, offered by Swiss Post in a handful of countries.

  33. Re:You are a lucky man. Here it is the business mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm also a Finn and I use the "no ads please" message on my mail slot, and I seldom get any junk snail mail. The only spam that is slipping through are spam mails that are addressed directly to me in an envelope. I think such envelopes should class ass a criminal act of spamming by the way.

    UK postal workers: the strike was a move in the right direction; no-one should need to put up with that! Please go on strike again, and demand to only volunteerly deliver spam-snail-mail, and DON'T take no for an answer. If no agreement => resign, they'll cave in eventually (or get a more noble job than spamming people... isn't spam activity illegal by the way?? at least on the internet, shouldn't the real world also follow the same rules?) If no-one makes demands nothing would ever change for the better.

  34. A few months ago in a Postal office by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    "Heeeey!!! I just figured out how we can get PAID to read Playboys all day!"

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  35. Norwegian Rail Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it wasn't more economical, the [Norwegian] Postal service couldn't stand the train delays any longer. It has been a troublesome year for rail services in Norway, a lot of problems with train sets, tracks, lack of personnel and so on.

  36. No Spamming Consumers In Any Way by andersh · · Score: 1

    We have the same law(s) in all of Scandinavia (as well as non-Scandinavian Finland).

    It extends to e-mail as well, you are not allowed to spam consumers by phone, SMS, email or mail unless you already have a direct relationship with them (i.e. they're already customers).

    My government provides a website where you can register your reservation against any form of commercial solicitation. It does however not include charities. All businesses have to update their registers every three months to filter out any new reservations, and it's *their* responsibility to do so. If they break the law there are severe penalties available to the relevant authorities.

    1. Re:No Spamming Consumers In Any Way by Tempsi · · Score: 1

      Whether or not Finland is part of the Scandinavia is a matter of opinion and perspective. It isn't and yet it is.

      Anyway, generic junk mail is most definitely allowed in Finland without prior permission. Don't know about the so called "Scandinavian" countries.

  37. Bad Comparison by andersh · · Score: 1

    You're missing the point, this is meant to replace postal delivery to all consumers and corporate customers.

    That's very different from your "outsourcing" scenario which I doubt very many buy into. This would be the standard service for all, not some extra service you buy.

  38. Viewable on phone? by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    The volunteers will have images of all their letters viewable on a computer or phone.

    Wow, I think phones here work differently than those in Finland.

  39. Half-Truth, An Optional Service by andersh · · Score: 1

    That's very innovative of Portugal, but the Finns want to use it by default. That's very different from just offering it as an optional service. The Finns want everyone to use it.

    It's actually very logical that the postal services of the world would want to stop wasting time and money on delivering mere documents. It's the box/parcel/package delivery that is profitable and important today.

  40. You're Not Getting The Point by andersh · · Score: 1

    You're missing the point, the Finns want to use it by default for everyone. That is a whole lot more innovative than offering it as an optional service.

    It would reduce the frequency of physical postal delivery, saving on delivery costs while maintaining service levels.

    We all know how to scan and email documents, the Postal services of the world aren't blind. Lots of countries offer this as a service, it just doesn't reduce the cost structure of the Postal service.

    1. Re:You're Not Getting The Point by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point, the Finns want to use it by default for everyone.

      Lol, thanks for repeating the article summary for me. I don't know how I ever read it and didn't read it at the same time. If we all just stuck to the exact contents of the article summary there would be no posts here.

      I'm pretty sure you can't name a private mailbox facility that does scan and email without seriously googling for it. The point of my post being that most people are unaware that they can get the personal benefits of that service themselves without involving a government agency. Oh look - government abuse of privacy was actually mentioned in the article, I guess that was part of the original point after all.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  41. Dial 1-800-COURIER by andersh · · Score: 1

    "Welcome to DHL, how may I help you today?"

    "Hello, I'm a lawyer, I need these documents delivered to my client in person."

    On a related note this is Europe, we're mostly socialists here, the "free market" is not that interesting to us. We're more interested in social services, and the postal service is not a profitable operation in most countries. It's a basic service required and paid for by the government. Reducing the cost, without reducing the service level is more important.

  42. Simple Answer: Funding by cmseagle · · Score: 1
    >How about the postal service let me opt out of getting junk mail delivered?

    In a lot of places (Britain particularly) the postal service relies on the money paid by junk mailers. No junk mail, no funding for delivering real mail.

    1. Re:Simple Answer: Funding by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Same in the US. The USPS is relying more on junk mail revenue as first class revenue plummets.

  43. This service is available in the US, too... by sotweed · · Score: 1

    .. from a company called Earth Class Mail. They receive your mail, send you an image of the envelope, and let you tell them what to do with it: shred it, recycle it, open and scan contents and send PDF, deposit check, etc. The company was the subject of a sort-of documentary last year.

  44. A useful idea by Sam+Douglas · · Score: 1

    It seems like a genuinely useful service to offer in cases where communicating the information is more important than the physical letter; if implemented as an opt-in service for both sender and receiver. It seems like it would help reduce costs for transporting mail (transport larger amounts of mail at a time less frequently) which could be a big saving for a country with a sparse population and alpine conditions. Perhaps you could choose to have the original destroyed after reading it online if it had not already been sorted/distributed.

  45. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome big brother! Privacy? who needs it, besides we're glad to give up all of our rights to keep us safe from terrorists, right? RIGHT?

  46. Mass mail and private mail by Tempsi · · Score: 1

    There is a difference between "mass mail" and "private mail" in Finland at least... "Mass mail" is generic junk mail that doesn't have YOUR name and address on it, and some of it is delivered totally independent of the postal services, by different companies. So basically some of the junk mail delivery has nothing to do with the postal services whatsoever.

  47. Winland.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..strikes again!

  48. Just Facts - Scandinavia does not include Finland by andersh · · Score: 1

    The Americans/Australians/South Africans are no more British than you are Scandinavian just because you were a colony.

    Scandinavia consists of the three Kingdoms of Denmark, Norway and Sweden.

    I know you Finns like to think you are Scandinavians, but we Scandinavians don't think of you as such - and that's the only opinion that matters.

    German, British or general European ignorance of who is what does not make you any more Scandinavian. You're Nordic, get over it.

    I tend to think you have more in common with your Russian neighbors than us, not the Finns in present day Russian territory, but the real Russians. Or perhaps more like our Sami friends in some ways.

    Either way you're not ethnically, linguistically or historically (see: Vikings/Kalmar union) related to us Scandinavians. You're still very nice people, but you're not part of our family. Just our extended "family" of Nordic friends.

  49. Re:You are a lucky man. Here it is the business mo by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    The only spam that is slipping through are spam mails that are addressed directly to me in an envelope.

    Hey, I believe Itella has a form which you can fill at the post office to ban this kind of junk too.

  50. V-mail delivered on paper not film by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Yea, except the general public can actually do something with PDFs, where as film negatives are really a pain in the ass to deal with for this purpose. True, old idea, new implementation, but its definitely an improvement over the last one.

    The public never saw v-mail films. Film was just the transocean transport media. V-mail was printed on lightweight paper once it got to the U.S. The letter was also folded up to be its own envelope. Or at least thats how the single sheet v-mail based letters my grandmother received were. IIRC it looked like the original letter was written on a special v-mail form not on general purpose paper. Perhaps that made for automated processing. Other letters my grandmother received that were on regular paper and/or were multiple pages were shipped as the original paper rather than v-mail. Or course that might be an army/navy thing. The letters on regular paper were from the navy, the v-mail was from the army.

    --
    Perpenso Calc for iPhone and iPod touch, scientific and bill/tip calculator, fractions, complex numbers, RPN

  51. UK junk mail and why the unions objected by fantomas · · Score: 1

    You guys are so lucky. Actually I think you have a generally cool country and I think I'd happily try living in Finland if I wasn't so rubbish at languages! - thoroughly enjoyed my visits to Helsinki.

    So this junk mail problem. Until recently the post workers had to deliver "unaddressed mail" to houses - junk mail/spam which is addressed "Dear Householder/ To The Owner" etc. Usually this is from insurance companies, double glazing companies etc, people selling us stuff. They don't even know who lives in the house.

    Currently, the cap on the number of these items is three per house per day. But with the ratification of the new agreement between the Communications Workers Union (CWU) and the Royal Mail, that cap will be lifted. The postal workers represented by their unions weren't happy about this, they don't like carry the extra weight on their backs every day and know that they aren't popular with house owners for delivering junk mail. If they didn't have to carry so much junk mail they could carry more real mail and get round more houses in the same time.

    So already you can get 18 junk mails a week (no Sunday deliveries) but now we might get as many as the junk companies want to post us.

    We do have a junk mail opt-out system you can sign up for "Mail Preference Service" but this only stops you from receiving *addressed* mail, stuff with your name on it (so if you joined a competition for a prize and gave them your name and address and they send you junk afterwards). It doesn't stop the *unaddressed* mail.

    I think Finland sounds a more civilised country than the UK in this respect.

    The problem is our country is short of money so the national services like the post are looking to find ways of making money and being paid to deliver junk mail is something they will do...

  52. Buggie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from finland, and i don't see the point in this. We already have workin electronic billing system. We have fairly advanced, secure, fast and wide internet banking too. I get most of my bills straight to my bank account, where i can easily review them and click "pay" on my own computer when i want. Most of the companies provide a copy of the bill to my e-mail, and i can choose to not have the paper version at all. I don't even remember when was the last time i had a traditional paper bill, most of the mail is just spam nowadays. And if i remember correctly, our government is working on a system where all the ofiicial mail (pension, social security, unemployment etc.) will be availabe online starting 2011. No need for postal workers to scan my mail, when there is no important mail to scan at all. The occasional postcard, magazine etc. can wait a few days if they want to cut delivery costs. After the new system is in place, i really can't see any good reasons for the scanning your mail -service.

  53. Re:You are a lucky man. Here it is the business mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As yet another Finn with the same sign on my door, I can say that it stops almost all junk. The only ones that don't respect the sign are pizza delivery men - whenever they deliver a pizza to a neighbour, they shove their menu into all mailboxes nearby. I even changed my sign to read "No ads. No pizza menus." to make it as clear as can be but despite that they've kept coming and once I even happened to see a pizza guy put down a menu in my mailbox and asked him "can't read?" and pointed at the sign but he was arrogant enough to reply "what you gonna do? Call the police?" (in broken Finnish since they're always from the middle east or so). I just wonder whether he thinks I'll ever order pizza from that joint - especially when you can order on-line from elsewhere :b

  54. Kramer had it right by kid_wonder · · Score: 1

    There was a Seinfeld episode where Kramer went into the post office to stop sending him mail - got me thinking. Why do we have to receive all this crap in a box in our front yard? I pay my bills online or schedule checks from my bank each month. There are few items that I actually open up every month, most go straight into the trash. The items I do open I end up scanning into PDF anyway as invoices or paystubs.

    I actually pay for a service like this: Earth Class Mail, there are few others like this too. They receive your mail and scan the envelope which you access online just like your e-mail, then you can pick it up (inconvenient) or scanned, forwarded or shredded/recycled. It's a bit expensive and I've only been doing it for a couple months but so far so good.

    I have a real street address (no PO Box) which so far no one has balked at: the DMV, my insurance company, voter registration.

    Of course, the reason I am doing this is so that I can live anywhere I want without having to change my address every time I move -- except for magazine subscription (which with the new iPad/eReader devices will hopefully not be needed anymore). I work remote and can take my phone number anywhere I go (skype, vonage, etc) and make or receive calls from my laptop.

    --

    "Oh, you hate your job? There's a support group for that, it's called everyone, they meet at the bar."
  55. I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So these cheap bastards want to scan my porn and my inflatable dolls? Buy their own I say.

  56. Godwon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know you Finns like to think you are Scandinavians, but we Scandinavians don't think of you as such - and that's the only opinion that matters.

    Boy, do I know how you must be feeling!

    We had a similar crowd over here. We knew them gays, communists and Jews liked to think they belonged, but we didn't think of them as such - and that's the only opinion that mattered to us.

    Ignorance of who was what didn't make them belong any more. They were hardly human, get over it.

    Yada yada yada.