Slashdot Mirror
Rocket Racing League Showcases New X-Racers
FleaPlus writes "The Rocket Racing League demonstrated two of their new 'Mark III' X-Racer rocketplanes at an air show in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Besides making for a fun show, the League also pushes the boundaries for reusable and easily maintainable rocket engines. (The X-Racer's liquid oxygen and ethanol rocket engine was made by John Carmack's Armadillo Aerospace, which recently released a video showcasing some of the rockets they've launched and landed in the past year.)"
In other words, the Rocket Racing league found a way to make the most common form of space propulsion marketable to the general public: entertainment. Well played. If this rocket racing league takes off, it will certainly spurn advances in chemical based propulsion and reusable rocket engines since entertainment seems to be a great way to generate R&D money for technology (see NASCAR). I'm impressed.
Motorcycles, Robots, Space Gossip and More!
Try this one instead: http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/rocket-racing-tulsa-demonstration-100426.html
What is the purpose of the contract for the hovering rockets? Is NASA planning landers that will have to hover somewhere - like Mars - or something?
RIP America
July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001
It's called the Lunar Lander Challenge. Does that tell you anything?
The masses want to see blood.
NASCAR is a 500 mile left turn, hoping somebody makes a right turn.
Airplane Photos, Airline News, Planespotting Guides
> What is the purpose of the contract for the hovering rockets? Is NASA planning landers that will have to hover somewhere - like Mars - or something?
There's a few markets for VTVL hovering rockets, being pursued by companies like Armadillo Aerospace (mentioned in the summary), Masten Space Systems, and Blue Origin:
* suborbital atmospheric science payloads: relatively little is known about the upper atmosphere, and this allows much cheaper and more frequent atmospheric sampling compared to current methods (weather balloons, million-dollar sounding rockets, etc.)
* microgravity flights: you can get a 3-4 minutes of microgravity, which is useful for biology experiments, physics experiments, and testing space systems
* space observing: you can fly instruments above the atmosphere to take some quick photos and other measurements of stellar bodies, as a lower-cost alternative to orbital space telescopes
* pop-up rockets: using the hovering rocket as a reusable booster for a second-stage which goes into orbit
* manned flights: for tourism and astronaut training
* in the future, lunar/Mars landers, for either unmanned or manned missions
* testing systems to be used on landers. Armadillo has mentioned recently that NASA is using their lander as a testbed for some systems which may be used on the "Project M" mission to land a humanoid robot on the Moon within 1000 days.
I am so happy you posted that under the UID: "Areyoukiddingme." Very nice.
Motorcycles, Robots, Space Gossip and More!
I miss Rocket Racing. It was fun riding on Mongooses and shooting other people off theirs with rocket launchers.
That is, fun as long as you were playing against people who actually played to win instead of just griefing to prevent anyone else from winning. It could have used a rule that expired the invulnerability for players that stayed off a ride too long.
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
When is Barack going to tour John's shop?
"LOx & Bagels"!
-
With high tech sports like this, the fancy stuff gets a lot of press, but I bet the small stuff will really help out space exploration.
Take the 3D virtual race course technology, not super surprising, but super dam useful for future civilian rocket/space flight applications.
Just having a place, such as a the Rocket Racing league, that provides a venue and funding to develop bleeding edge, high risk tech is a massive boon for progress.
Safety systems, rocket aerodynamics, even flight strategy techniques. It will also provide a new employment pool and a place to get experience for new engineers, flight crew and pilots.
And yet humans can barely handle this simplicity.
Bring on the dangerous chemicals, WOOO!
1996 was listening: http://www.theonion.com/articles/nasa-nascar-merge,1051/
Its sort of well...boring.
I mean, the Chinese where doing that way back when people thought rocks where cool.
Maybe its time to throw away the standard model, which missed like 95% of reality about how the universe works, and think about a different way to do things.
First though, to do that we need to:
1) Get rid of the money surrounding rocket contracts.
2) Corrupt congressional leaders which are bought off by these contractors.
3) Maybe getting rid of group think that is required in science today to think exactly the same as everyone else if you want to get published or get funding.
oh yes....then of course there is the powers that be...because they simply will not stand for any kind of power source that will be limitless and pretty much freely available to everyone that would come about through said research because well, it threatens to end thier strangle hold on most of the world.
If you decide that really, rockets are so passe, you might want to look at any of the 4 points above.
But be very careful, trying to chaneg just ONE of the above points could be dangerous to your health.
-Hack
Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
LO2 and ethanol... you can get frost burn from contact, but neither are particularly dangerous or exotic. Certainly not when compared to stuff like hydrazine and other extremely toxic chemicals commonly used for rocket fuel.
Efficiency isn't everything.
T
Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
Okay, so it's rocket powered, so what? ?Rockets are not the best type of engines for atmospheric flight. Consider the Rocket pack's 30 seconds of flight time vs. the jet pack's half hour. Here's the relevant sound bite: "The planes carry enough fuel for a total of two minutes of thrust. So, once real racing begins, the winning pilot will likely be the one who most effectively manages the plane's energy under such constraints". Oh, how exhilarating! And don't forget they don't actually race each other - that would be too unsafe. Each racer has its own virtual track. Forget about Nascar-style collisions! I like space technology and airplanes, but this is just pathetic.
It's nice that Armadillo are continuing the legacy of the DC-X Delta Clipper.
This video shows the DC-X taking off, gaining altitude, dipping it's nose under the horizon, regaining vertical flight and landing. It's pretty amazing.
Shame it got cancelled.
"Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
The venture being considered for financing was a private rocket company. They didn't want to compete with government's subsidized winners the way the government subsidized the Shuttle.
To make matters worse, the likely source of the DC-X support came from Congressman Rorabacher after I met with him in 1991 regarding the Launch Services Purchase Act and mentioned to him that Truax was looking at a trans-pacific shuttle service as a possible business venture.
PS: Armadillo didn't its technology from the DC-X legacy.
Seastead this.