Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Three Ground-Breaking Miniature Biosensors

Posted by samzenpus on from the hospital-pill dept.

kkleiner writes "Over the past few years, several research teams have developed increasingly smaller and cheaper biosensors with improved detection capabilities and faster turnaround times. Whether you are a doctor diagnosing patients in the rural areas of Africa or a Homeland Security agent working to thwart an act of bioterrorism, one of these little devices should be your sidekick."

18 comments

  1. Cue obligatory comment... by cappp · · Score: 1

    Perfect combination for every guy out there - gadgets and a legitimate reason to argue that smaller is better.

  2. Ground breaking? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ya' mean like 'multispectral imaging '...? Georgia Tech Creates Palm "Tricorder" Scanner Technology - 2008

  3. One of these doesn't belong by Null+Nihils · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm probably going to get modded down for this, but it needs to be said:

    a doctor diagnosing patients in the rural areas of Africa or a Homeland Security agent working to thwart an act of bioterrorism

    One of these doesn't belong. I'll give you a hint: There are billions of one (that we don't hear enough about from anyone), and like three of the other (that we hear way too much about from certain mainstream media sources).

    1. Re:One of these doesn't belong by LifesABeach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I could, I'd mod you up. Personally, I was considering applications applied to customers, like me. It would be nice to have feed back on how my body is doing, and other applications that would allow me to live a healthier life. I guess 7 billion customers are not as exciting as a doctor or bio freak.

    2. Re:One of these doesn't belong by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "...or a Homeland Security agent working to thwart an act of bioterrorism"

      Thwart an act of bio-terrorism?

      How do ANY of these devices detect biological contaminants before they are released? Wouldn't that be "verifying an act of bio-terrorism"?

      Silly marketing pinheads.

    3. Re:One of these doesn't belong by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I'll go for "give professionals all around the world a cheap way to analyze chemical and biological substances"

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:One of these doesn't belong by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      On a serious note, it would prove a useful way to check if a needle is safe for use by drug addicts. Would cut blood-borne infections in the western world by a lot.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    5. Re:One of these doesn't belong by the_other_chewey · · Score: 2, Informative

      a doctor diagnosing patients in the rural areas of Africa or a Homeland Security agent working to thwart an act of bioterrorism

      One of these doesn't belong. I'll give you a hint: There are billions of one (that we don't hear enough about from anyone),[...]

      Your point is an entirely valid one, and I agree.

      A nitpick though: There are no billions of people in the rural areas of Africa. Not even a single billion.
      The whole of Africa has a population of only a wee bit over a billion, and over 100 million of those live
      in the 50 largest cities alone.
      Including everything down to the level of decently-sized towns, this number more than doubles.

      Africa as a whole (yes, that's a rather invalid viewpoint, but you started it ;-) is way more urbanized
      than you seem to realize. That of course doesn't remove the need for much better health care.

    6. Re:One of these doesn't belong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those things are not going to be sold to big crowds because the possible usage in terrorism, thus the marginals are going to be small, research and development are not going to be done in adequate intensity and the prices are going to be high.

      This is why we can't have the nice things!

  4. Unrelated by TaggartAleslayer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I read this as Three Ground-Breaking Minotaur Binosauruses. I didn't know what it meant, but I smiled and clicked anyway. I dunno. I expected horns and scales or something.

    Then I wondered if there were a dinosaur named Binosaurus, so I googled "Binosauruses" and there was a single return. So I clicked it. After the purple burned my retina, I closed it and RTFA, "Fast, small and cheap. No, I’m not describing the latest compact sports cars..."

    It started with a car analogy. I just gave up at that point.

    1. Re:Unrelated by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      By any chance did you experiment with mind-altering substances in the 60's?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Unrelated by JustOK · · Score: 1

      no, there were at least a hundred he experimented with.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:Unrelated by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      By any chance did you experiment with mind-altering substances in the last 60 minutes?

      FTFY

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    4. Re:Unrelated by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      It looks to me like he's been watching too many Bing commercials. DVR, man!

  5. Are these the new capabilities for cell phones? by Centurix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Biometric monitoring?

    Along with 5MP cameras, compass, GPS and inertia sensors could we start seeing cell phones with heart rate monitors, blood O2 sensors and blood-sugar detectors?

    --
    Task Mangler
  6. gkrellm by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    that would be a cool gkrellm plugin

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  7. Diabetes by plastbox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dream of the day when someone makes (and releases) an implantable blood glucose sensor. In October 2006, a company called Digital Angel was awarded a patent for an implantable, blood glucose measuring RFID-tag. From what I recall they even had a working device. The only downside was that due to scar tissue and encapsulation the chip needed to be removed every 6 months and a new one implanted, something any MD with a scalpel could do.

    "Drive-thru"-surgery every 6 months to have constant blood glucose measurements? Yes please! Anyone know where this tech went? As a Type 1 Diabetic, it'd probably extend my lifespan by 10 years. Oh, and I could buy an RFID-reader and make my own data logger with graphs and biofeedback and everything!

    1. Re:Diabetes by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Not sure why they haven't got more success with stuff like this yet: http://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/03/us/plastic-pancreas-in-diabetic-dogs-brings-human-tests-closer.html

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_pancreas#Approaches_to_an_Artificial_Pancreas

      --