Saturn's Moon Prometheus Spawning Moonlets
astroengine writes "For the first time ever, astronomers have witnessed the formation of celestial objects... in Saturn's rings. As the Saturnian moon Prometheus dashes through the gas giant's rings, it leaves large formations of ice behind, some as large as 12 kilometers in diameter. When the small moon makes another pass, it is not known whether these giant 'snowballs' remain or get destroyed, but according to Linda Spilker, from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory: 'You can think of Saturn's rings as miniature versions of the disks where planets form. The same physical processes are occurring.'"
The Planetary Society blog has further explanation, as well as pictures and a movie of Prometheus' interaction with Saturn's rings. The Cassini team has released some fantastic images of the fans and clumps in the F ring, as well as a simulation showing how the ring's particles are affected by the moon's passing.
It's a space stationlet.
.
Trolling is a art,
Couldn't a space ship or probe come by and pick up one of the "small" moonlets and use it for fuel? 12KM of pre-frozen volatile organic matter sounds like a great windfall if you ask me.
... to create moonlets. This time he's getting lots more eaten by the eagle than just his liver.
...coming out of Uranus.
Summary says 12 kilometers, article says 12 miles in diameter. Is it really that hard to get right? You could always say it's 3,862,425,600,000 beard seconds in diameter...
Am I the only one who pictured something to do with Katamari in regards to flying through the rings forming larger objects?
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
That's not a moon, that's moon poo.
The submitter is currently in Europe, according to his blog, so perhaps he's in do-as-the-Romans mode? He reads every number as if it has a European unit of measure attached to it. Hey, it's a lot easier than actually doing the conversion and ending up with inconvenient fractions....
It's the Fithp
Say did Niven & Pournelle ever write a sequel to that?
Should have included this bit from the article:
"Over time, the disrupted particles -- mostly dense, sticky ice -- can take on a life of their own, clumping together under their own growing gravitational force."
The summary only talks about celestial objects destroying each other, then simply states that scientists are witnessing the "creation" of objects. We've seen stuff smash together all the time. The subject matter at hand is what happens afterward.
Maybe it's just following in the NASA tradition.
I thought they got canned by GM.
*Ducks*
To do list for Windows
Ice is made of water, but it is a solid. So, is this a #1 or #2?
Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.