Why the US Keeps Minting Coins People Hate
CeruleanDragon writes "In hidden vaults across the country, the US government is building a stockpile of $1 coins. The hoard has topped $1.1bn — imagine a stack of coins reaching almost seven times higher than the International Space Station — and the piles have grown so large the US Federal Reserve is running out of storage space."
I can probably find storage space for a couple hundreds of thousands.
If you want some dollar coins, they are commonly dispensed in vending machines in the post office. After spending some time in Canada, I think that they work well - despite my initial surprise. It would be helpful to have a two dollar coin as well, one that is clearly distinguishable from the one dollar.
I have a few of them laying around - Monroe, Washington, and a couple of Madisons, as well as a few of the Sacagaweas, Eisenhowers, and Anthonys. I think that I'm going to start using them.
Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
and the problem goes away real fast.
I'm sure they could engage the pentagon to create an extremely lethal weapon based around these pieces of ammunition.
Imagine soldiers firing compact railguns with these dollars as ammo at the bad guys... extremly effective if the enemies run to pick up the coins.
One reason Americans have resisted dollar coins is because the Mint has made dumb decisions about the coins.
The Eisenhower dollar was large and heavy. Its diameter made it uncomfortable to put in a change pocket. So when they created the Susan B. Anthony dollar, they decided to make it smaller -- small enough, in fact, that it was easily mistaken for a quarter. People ended up handing out quarters when they were looking for dollars and vice versa. You couldn't easily tell which was which just by reaching into your pocket.
The new dollar coins are gold-colored instead of silver, but they retain the dimensions of the Susan B. Anthony dollar. That's smart in one sense, because it means vending machines that take the old dollar coins can still take the new ones. But it's also stupid, because almost no vending machines take Susan B. Anthony dollars, since nobody uses them (or if they do accept them, they register as quarters). So in the end, consumers see the new coins as just gold versions of the old coins, and they don't want to get burned again -- leading to the problem cited in the article, where customers and businesses alike are reluctant to accept them. Most people I know aren't even totally sure if the dollar coins are genuine legal tender or if they're just some kind of passing fad that will be unusable in a few years, like out-of-date postage stamps (and this doubt is exacerbated by the fact that they keep changing the pictures on the front, so they seem like collector's coins).
Contrast this to the UK and EU, each of which took pains to differentiate their highest-value coins from the others. Both the 1 Euro and 1 Pound coins are notably thicker than other coins, in addition to being a unique size, which makes them more easily recognizable by touch. (As an aside, European notes tend to have specific sizes for each denomination, too, while the U.S. notes are all the same size, making it difficult for blind people to choose one from the other.)
If the U.S. Mint would just smarten up, maybe it wouldn't keep wasting money like this.
Breakfast served all day!
With the dollar having lost more than 7X its value in the past 50 years, there's no reason now that dollar coins can't act like quarters and five dollar bills take the lowest-denomination paper spot, relative to how people used to behave. People leave pennies and sometimes nickels behind - that's an indication of value. Trouble is, a decimal system of money makes inflationary policy cumbersome.
The non-use of the coin dollar in favor of the paper dollar, might actually be a tribute to the value of the coin dollar according to Gresham's Law.
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
FTA:
Yet the piles have continued to grow because the law requires the US Mint to issue four new presidential coins each year even if most of the previous year's coins remain in government vaults.
The 50-states quarters that they spent the last decade were a pretty big success, and there were alot of people collecting them (at least I remember seeing alot of special kits for holding all your quarters on sale), so why not do a "44 presidents" set?
Better yet, we could just repeal this stupid law, but that's just too damn logical for Congress.
The wife like me to bring back coinage from when I go to work abroad. I'll have to see if I can get hold of some of these for the collection.
Numismatists of the world, unite and take on those damned scriphophilists!
Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
You can't easily slip a $1 coin into a stripper's g-string.
A lot of people initially resisted the change from paper bills to dollar coins (and later the same for the 2$ denomination), but how did the government make sure usage happened by the public? Simple. They did not give them a choice. Paper bills were retired and new ones were not issued, forcing people to adopt them. While it seems harsh in retrospect, it did make the switch a success. Because there was no other option!
I would personally approve of the construction of a several Scrooge McDuck-style money bins around the country.
So in the end, consumers see the new coins as just gold versions of the old coins, and they don't want to get burned again
Now everyone using the money (ie a "money user" - which is everyone.. but the Amish.. i think) is called a "consumer"!?
why not do a "44 presidents" set?
They are. It's been running since 2007. The article summary even says "the US Mint [issues] four new presidential coins each year". And they're going absolutely nowhere except "government vaults."
I'm starting to think this is a strategy to salvage/prolong our faltering money supply: print/coin huge piles of cash, then stash it (either by creating something the public wants so much they hoard it, or creating something the public doesn't want so it sits in vaults, or just create it and don't even offer it for general use), creating a financial ballast to counteract the ever-extending debt. Don't have the whole theory worked out, but there's got to be something to making that much cash and stashing out of the public's hands.
Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
Why did the mint insist on making dollar coins this UGLY?
Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
"With the dollar having lost more than 7X its value in the past 50 years,"
So, the dollar is now worth -600% of its orignal value? How is that possible?
I don't use cash if I can help it. It is unsanitary, and not having a record of my every transaction in my online bank account login is unthinkable.
New currency, bit shifted to the left. $10 becomes the new $1. Coinage would be still "penny, nickel, dime quarter" just have new issues.
Nobody wants or cares about "pennies" (cent) anymore. nickels and dimes are almost there too. To fill up tires costs $.50 at most gas stations. It HURTS. But if it were ... $.05 why that wouldn't hurt as much. We could simply move a decimal point, issues some new currency over one month, and be done.
And all the counterfeiters would have a brief field day, and all the drug cartels with US $$ stuffed away would be up a creek trying to redeem all those millions in currency.
Okay, it is a simple idea, it would never work, and if it would work congress would never adopt it. Silly me.
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
So long as the slot is big enough for the biggest note then what does it matter?
nb. Compare the size of a crumpled banknote with a new one - the crumpled on is smaller! Oh, noes...!
No sig today...
I'm sure they'll come up with a place for you to insert the coins.
Besides, lots of heavy coins would make underwear droop downwards - more coins=more droop!
No sig today...
...I can say that I truly HATE $1 and $2 coins. Having ten one-dollar bills in my wallet was never a problem. Having ten one-dollar coins in my pocket, (along with other assorted change), is a major PITA. Hold on to your paper singles, America! Folding money rules; one-dollar and two-dollar coins just suck!
'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
Businesses resist the new dollar coins because they are still easily confused with quarters and the costs of accomodating the new coin is high. People who handle money all day do not stop and look at the coins every single time they make change. They go by feel and location. It will cost businesses money to adapt to new coins: They will have to change their cash drawers, coin counting and dispensing devices and eat the costs of mistaking dollar coins for quarters.
The brilliant political decision to make the newdollar the same (or closely similar) size as the quarter is real-world moronic and because it is such a brilliant political move we're stuck with it regardless of the real-world consequences. If the size were different and it were clearly distinguishable from every other coin it may have a better chance of being adopted. Until then don't expect businesses to readily accept them even if the dollar bill goes away.
me. --a by-product of public education