Slashdot Mirror


Rupert Murdoch Publishes North Korean Flash Games

eldavojohn writes "You might recall back in June when it was noted that North Korea was developing and exporting flash games. Now, the isolated nation state is apparently home to some game developers that are being published by a subsidiary of News Corp. (The games include Big Lebowski Bowling and Men In Black). Nosotek Joint Venture Company is treading on thin ice in the eyes of a few academics and specialists that claim the Fox News owner is 'working against US policy.' Concerns grow over the potential influx of cash, creating better programmers that are then leveraged into cyberwarfare capabilities. Nosotek said that 'training them to do games can't bring any harm.' The company asserts its innocence, though details on how much of the games were developed in North Korea are sparse. While one of the poorest nations in the world could clearly use the money, it remains to be seen if hardliner opponents like the United States will treat Nosotek (and parent company News Corp.) as if they're fostering the development of computer programmers inside the DPRK. The United Nations only stipulates that cash exchanged with companies in the DPRK cannot go to companies and businesses associated with military weaponry or the arms trade. Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski Bowling if you knew it was created in North Korea?"

186 comments

  1. Good for everyone by alfredos · · Score: 0

    A main problem with North Korea is their isolation. Whatever reduces isolation reduces the problem. So good for them and good for the rest of the world. Under this assumption, I'd be eager to buy stuff from them, rather than the opposite.

    1. Re:Good for everyone by odies · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Exactly. What about just letting North Korea develop their country without interference from US again like with everything else? Just stop the stupid cyberwar bullshit and let them make freaking flash games. US is only making the cituation worse.

      It's also just the usual bullshit and propaganda how bad North Korea supposedly is for wanting to defend their own country. North Korea says US is bad and wants to destroy their country, US says North Korea is bad and wants to destroy their country. It's all just stupid propaganda, and because the other side does it the other has to do. It's like stupid kids playing.

      Truth is North Korea isn't even as bad as US and all news outlets try to draw it as. Take a travel there and see yourself - it's possible, you just have to book your trip maybe a month before and it most likely opens up your eyes. I'm not saying theres nothing wrong with North Korea, but it isn't like US paints it.

    2. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy some Noko Jeans.

    3. Re:Good for everyone by migla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny how there are two distinct ways of handling un-democratic countries. Either you trade with them to make them more democratic or you boycott them for not being democratic. You (A government + business) can't be wrong, either way. Very clever.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    4. Re:Good for everyone by odies · · Score: 0, Insightful

      A little more about traveling to North Korea. I'm living in Asia currently and as it's close to me, I plan to take a trip there this winter. During my life living in many countries I've learnt that prejudices are just those - prejudices. People always give a shittier picture about something, and when you see it yourself it's just different. That's why it's like sitting on your computer all day long and commenting on things you have absolutely no idea about - most news are onesided, and most people tell you onesided stories with extra things that might not even be true. That's why you have to see and do it yourself to actually know anything.

    5. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except isn't North Korea self-isolationist?

    6. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how there are two distinct ways of handling un-democratic countries. Either you trade with them to make them more democratic or you boycott them for not being democratic. You (A government + business) can't be wrong, either way. Very clever.

      Does either of the two ways actually lead to a more democratic country? Boycotts and embargos from governments don't work because they keep the people uninformed and poor. Trade with poor countries usually ends in quasi-slave labour and a few rich managers who exploit people and exert undemocratic influence on their government.

      Anyway, this whole "yay democracy" is nonsense because even the so-called democratic countries are under-cover oligarchies, ruled by the rich and powerful. At least trade might raise their standard of living a little.

    7. Re:Good for everyone by migla · · Score: 1

      >Except isn't North Korea self-isolationist?

      Apparently not to the extent of not developing flash games for the international market, though.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    8. Re:Good for everyone by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Trade <snip> usually ends in quasi-slave labour and a few rich managers who exploit people and exert undemocratic influence on their government.

      Fixed that for you.

    9. Re:Good for everyone by alfredos · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can tell you what did not work for us here in Spain. I'm not old enough to have lived through it, but I sure am to remember how things began to change in the yeas following the death of our dictator and our transition to democracy. Isolation does not work for anybody except, perhaps, for extraordinarily clever (and, more often than not, iron-fisted) dictators.

      You can contend that trading with an undemocratic country can strengthen the dictator. I agree with that. However, the basic needs of the people of the country are more important than the dictator, or lack thereof. First thing is food, health, education, a future; once you have all that, you can go with lesser important details like democracy. Democracy and dictatorship are equally as good if people is starving, or just have no future. However, when people is fed, healthy and working, democracy will eventually find its way. Look at history for a number of examples. It will be slow, but sure.

    10. Re:Good for everyone by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Spot on

      Hard rock, western cosmetics and western films have done more for the demise of USSR style Communism than all efforts of western governments and all "dissidents" combined.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    11. Re:Good for everyone by hedwards · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'd just be encouraging them. The problem isn't that we're not trading with them. The problem is that somebody is providing Kim Jong Il with the luxury goods he desires. Buying these games is just a matter of profiteering plain and simple, the money is not going to get back to the people nor is this going to decrease the isolation of the North Korean people. It's just another way in which Rupert Murdoch profits on the suffering of others.

    12. Re:Good for everyone by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Those are some of the strangest product images I've ever seen. Not to mention the style, are those loose fit jeans the new fashion?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    13. Re:Good for everyone by hao3 · · Score: 1

      It is very clever. It depends on their size, military might, and many, many strategic and other factors. You're always at risk of doing something wrong. However, handling them all in the same way would be very stupid.

      Oh, and News Corp. can rot in hell.

      --
      "Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." - G.K. Chesterton
    14. Re:Good for everyone by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It may not be as bad as the US paints it but its certainly a lot worse than the North Koreans paint it. Your "trip" to North Korea consists entirely of an agenda planned by the government specifically designed to show off the few good parts of North Korea and keep you as far away from ordinary North Koreans as possible. You are forced to bow to a statue of Kim Il Sung. If you go out wandering on your own or say something that could be considered critical of the North Korean government you will get kicked out of the country and your guide will be in for a LOT worse. No other country on the PLANET restricts travel this much. Obviously there is something really, REALLY wrong with North Korea.

      It's obvious you have an anti-US sentiment but you shouldn't let that cloud your judgement of North Korea.They It's a really, REALLY shitty place for those not lucky enough to be born into a wealthy, well connected family(irony!). Famine killed at least 10% of the population in the 1990s, the # of refugees willing to risk their life to escape to China where they pretty much know they will be treated as a slave is staggering, so obviously that tells you how bad it is in North Korea.

    15. Re:Good for everyone by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Informative

      Good luck in North Korea. Remember that you will be allowed to see will be strictly limited, and the North Korean government is well known to go to unusual lengths to present a good image outwards.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    16. Re:Good for everyone by slashqwerty · · Score: 1

      However, when people is fed, healthy and working, democracy will eventually find its way. Look at history for a number of examples.

      Alright, I'll call your bluff on that. What are some historical examples of democracy finding its way when the people are fed, healthy, and working and why would it have been different if the people were not fed, healthy, and working?

    17. Re:Good for everyone by Brummund · · Score: 1

      You forgot the more popular option #3: Bomb them back to the stone age.

    18. Re:Good for everyone by .tekrox · · Score: 1

      Appears people feel differently in these parts mate, Upmod if I had points.

    19. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Take a travel there and see yourself

      That's what this guy did:

      Guide to NK part 1

      Guide to NK part 2

      Guide to NK part 3

    20. Re:Good for everyone by longhairedgnome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The colonies?

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    21. Re:Good for everyone by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      A little more about traveling to North Korea. I'm living in Asia currently and as it's close to me, I plan to take a trip there this winter. During my life living in many countries I've learnt that prejudices are just those - prejudices. People always give a shittier picture about something, and when you see it yourself it's just different. That's why it's like sitting on your computer all day long and commenting on things you have absolutely no idea about - most news are onesided, and most people tell you onesided stories with extra things that might not even be true. That's why you have to see and do it yourself to actually know anything.

      In that little trip of yours, are you going to see the concentration camps they have up North?

    22. Re:Good for everyone by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      No? They have a lot of diplomacy and trade with China and Russia.

      Russia and China, wow, what a global diversity.

      There's more to the world than just US, you know.

      Yes, there is Japan, and South Korea, two flourishing democracies right next to them with whom North Korea has had wonderful relations because of its diplomatic acumen and respect for their border... or wait, scratch those two.

      Still the world is more than just the US, like Canada, UK, India, Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, and many others with whom the North Korea has had wonderful relations since they are so open and because its "Army First" policy, brandishing of nuclear weapons, kidnapping of Japanese citizens and shooting of rockets on Japanese and South Korean waters is so amenable and sounds like Kumbaya... or wait, scratch that.

      So what was your point again? Or were you just implying the problem is 100% solely a US machination, with the North Korean government having no legal, diplomatic and moral responsibility at all? Please enlighten me with your deep insight in International Relations.

    23. Re:Good for everyone by Trails · · Score: 2, Funny

      You say that now, but North Korea cannot be allowed to acquire vector-based technology. Just think of the explosion gradients and cluster mouse over bombs they could launch.

      You lefties are all the same, crying peace and progress until Kim Jong launches an ActionScript 2 - powered missile up your arse!! Then you'll be begging for Sean Hannity to come save your ass from the anti-aliased koreamen.

    24. Re:Good for everyone by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A little more about traveling to North Korea. I'm living in Asia currently and as it's close to me, I plan to take a trip there this winter. During my life living in many countries I've learnt that prejudices are just those - prejudices. People always give a shittier picture about something, and when you see it yourself it's just different. That's why it's like sitting on your computer all day long and commenting on things you have absolutely no idea about - most news are onesided, and most people tell you onesided stories with extra things that might not even be true. That's why you have to see and do it yourself to actually know anything.

      How wonderful, will you get a chance to take pictures of their concentration ("reeducation") camps where tens of thousands of people (including their families for fuck's sake). If you do, please put them in facebook (and if you don't a facebook account, create one just for this occasion.)

      Oh, I almost forgot, ask your Government/Military pre-approved tourist guide to take you North Korean farmers picking up grass to make soup because they literally have nothing else. Nothing makes a better souvenir than a picture of a emaciated person eating grass.

      Hopefully, when we invent time travel, you might get a chance for a one-in-a-lifetime vacation: a trip back to Auschwitz-Birkenau and Sobibor. Who knows, you might get lucky and the administrators will time their gassing schedule to your arrival so that you can take a picture. Trip to the Bahamas or Hokkaido? Screw that!

      ps. yeah, I went there and broke Godwin's Law, get over it.

    25. Re:Good for everyone by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First thing is food, health, education, a future; once you have all that, you can go with lesser important details like democracy.

      History strongly suggests that you can only have the former when you have the last. Dictatorships have a tendency to channel all resources for the benefit of the dictator, leading to ordinary people starving. It happened in France, it's happening in North Korea now.

      If you lack freedom, chances are that you'll soon lack everything else too.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    26. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are an armchair diplomat talking out of your ass. Get some perspective and a freaking clue before spouting your nonsensical drivel. The problem is not isolation, the problem is a whack-job dictator. You should understand the whack-job part, that is familiar territory...

    27. Re:Good for everyone by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "It's also just the usual bullshit and propaganda how bad North Korea supposedly is for wanting to defend their own country"

      Defend against.... who, exactly? Is anyone invading them? They've been at war with South Korea for almost 60 years because they only signed an armistice, meaning they're going to stop fighting but may resume at anytime. All N Korea has to do is stop screwing around and agree to make peace and they'd be welcomed into the world but they refuse. They're like to stubborn child that's sent to their room for not finishing supper but instead of coming down 10 minutes later to eat they sulk in their room.... for 60 years.

      "North Korea isn't even as bad as US and all news outlets try to draw it as. Take a travel there and see yourself "

      Why would anyone want to go to North Korea?! The last journalists that went there were sentenced to 12 years in N Korea jail just for entering the country. And North Korea isn't like France, where if the US govt said "Hey can we have our people back?" the French would oblige, North Korea can keep you and you're never released and no one rescues you.

      If you think North Korea is a great place to visit maybe you should go there and tell us how it turns out. In fact go to the DMZ and cross, it will be the last thing you ever do

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    28. Re:Good for everyone by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Someone I went to school with said he visitted North Korea once, he and a few of his friends who were journalists at the time. Since they were journalists they probably had it much harder than regular tourists. He said that before they could get into the country, that his group along with 2 dozen other people were taken out to a bar by some Korean correspondants. It was a Korean Bar, go figure. At said bar was their minister of foreign travel, or some position like that. Someone had told my friend before hand, "This night determines whether you get a visa or not. Try to enjoy it." So they drank and partied it up and had a good time. About half the people who went got their visa.

      So once they were in China, it was mostly as you described. A VERY guided tour of the place. What stuck out most though was that they were having some kind of national sports tournament (I think soccer/football, but I don't recall what was said). Before the start of the tournament, they were all escorted onto a pedastal in the middle of the field, with thousands of Koreans all around them, and they sang the national anthem for them, and then the big jumbotron screen said something along the lines of "Welcome, American Visitors!". Absolutely blew everyone's mind.

      Yeah, I had no idea that North Korea was really like that, I had a feeling they had really cut down tourist travel with the way current events are, but nothing like that. After hearing this story from my friend I went online to look up similar stories, and yep - they're all pretty much the same.

    29. Re:Good for everyone by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No fuckwit, I don't watch Fox News, I actually read about the world and don't blindly say, "America lies all the time!". You know what, Fox News also complains about how bad life is in other countries where the reality is a lot different. As they say a broken clock is right twice a day. Fox News complains about how bad life is in Cuba, and yet in Cuba tourists can travel the country for themselves and you have a lot of INDEPENDENTLY verified information on the status of the country(which is not great, but not nearly as bad as a lot of other countries on the planet). Ditto for Iran, Iraq(before during and after the war) etc. Saddam actually let people into the country and they could move around with (general) impunity. The country was in better shape before than war than it was after it. You won't get that report on Fox News.

      You CANNOT do that in North Korea, and I have read TONS of travel accounts(even the stuff on wikitravel) which concur, the only people that claim how wonderful North Korea is are either paid shills or just as fucktaded as you and are so convinced of how "evil" the west is that they will pretty much adopt any philosophy that opposes it, even if said philosophy is 1000000x worse than that of the west. North Korea suffered famine and still suffers severe food shortages, even the UN says that, but all but the most retarded of fuckwits, such as yourself, disagree.

    30. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I doubt it - when I went to Florida they didn't take us on a trip across the water to see the American concentration camp - so if they don't do it in the free world, they're not going to do it in DRPK.

    31. Re:Good for everyone by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alright, I'll call your bluff on that. What are some historical examples of democracy finding its way when the people are fed, healthy, and working and why would it have been different if the people were not fed, healthy, and working?

      Taiwan and South Korea are recent examples. This is happening today in places like Thailand and Iran. The recent riots in Bangkok and Tehran were not bread riots, they were about elections.

    32. Re:Good for everyone by orasio · · Score: 1

      ps. yeah, I went there and broke Godwin's Law, get over it.

      You honoured Godwin's law. Congratulations.

    33. Re:Good for everyone by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Troll

      People enter the US illegally all the time. The buy/rent houses. Get jobs with faked or stolen SS numbers. Pop out babies that become automatic citizens. For the most part they are not hunted down and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
      Fucking lefty. Get it right. You can not run around and defend long prison sentences for crossing a border and use the US as a fucking example.
      Are you brain dead?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    34. Re:Good for everyone by alfredos · · Score: 1

      Alright, I'll call your bluff on that. What are some historical examples of democracy finding its way when the people are fed, healthy, and working and why would it have been different if the people were not fed, healthy, and working?

      A few recent (twentieth century) ones: Spain, Chile, Argentina, Greece. Actually, the definition fits even Russia, the old Soviet republics around, and the old Eastern Europe block. You can argue that these people were not exactly as happy as they could be, but they received a pretty decent education (as it tends to happen in dictatorships) and for the most part enough supply of food and shelter (again, you can't compare with Western standards, but from what I've read hunger and homelessness were not top problems there) Just off the top of my head; there are many more.

      I can quote examples of the opposite, too, places where life is miserable and democracy doesn't find its way. Many African nations, unfortunately, fit that one.

      By the way (although we're digressing a bit), regarding GP post about the Big Brother form of keeping things calm. I happen to have daily contact with people from Romania. I can say many good things about them, but what strikes me is that they never say a word if it is not necessary. And when yes or no is enough, they will stop there and never add further explanations. Talk about efficient education on the ways of Big Brother.

    35. Re:Good for everyone by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Indeed. A lot of people here seem to thin North Korea is a Cuba- or Iran-type country, which the US has some huge problem with and the rest of the world is like, eh, whatever.

      North Korea is run by a lunatic, not a pretend lunatic we like to claim all leaders of countries we don't like are, but an actual one. It's channeling almost all it's production into military, and, yes, it kidnaps people.

      And, while it technically has 'diplomatic relations' with China and Russia, well, I urge everyone to go read about them. Neither of those countries like North Korea at all, both are only trying to keep the region stable. China doesn't want a flood of refugees, and Russia doesn't think the problem is solvable except via invasion (Whereas the west and China thinks the regime might collapse) by itself, which they really don't want to do, so they're trying to force NK to stop the nuclear program by themselves proposing sanctions to the UN.

      Anyone who thinks China and North Korea, or Russia and North Korea, are friends, is sadly mistaken. And while Russia does somewhat care what the US thinks, China doesn't give a damn. It's not acting under pressure from us. They're both actually worried about North Korea, it's just that they don't think 'withdrawing diplomatic relations' is a useful idea.

      And, frankly, I agree with them. Although normal diplomatic relations with North Korea would be tricky for the US seeing as we're technically at war with them. (It was an armistice, not a peace treaty.)

      North Korea is the kind of country the US pretends Cuba is, and pretended Iraq was. We didn't just invent those demonization out of nowhere, you know...this has happened before in history. It's right up there with Burma in fascism, except less people are starving in Burma, and the country does not threaten it's neighbors, as the military junta there is not actually crazy and actually does attempt to run the country.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    36. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it! Separate passport arrangements for whites and the coloreds..

    37. Re:Good for everyone by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      ...as it's close to me...

      Can you see it from your front porch? Sorry... Look, if you want to see how prosperous a country is, just take a look at how much energy it can waste

      Oh, the night life,
      It ain't no good life
      But it's my life

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    38. Re:Good for everyone by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      Dunno if anyone has posted this yet. But this was an interesting video I saw an book marked about a trip to North Korea.

    39. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot - we take your posts about thinking for yourself instead of mindlessly believing everything you read on the news, and moderate them "-1, Insightful".

    40. Re:Good for everyone by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 1

      A little more about traveling to North Korea. I'm living in Asia currently and as it's close to me, I plan to take a trip there this winter. During my life living in many countries I've learnt that prejudices are just those - prejudices. People always give a shittier picture about something, and when you see it yourself it's just different.

      That's a very true observation. Lots of terrible things were said about the Nazi's, but when the allies finally got to Germany things were just different. Only in that case, they were different in the most horrific of ways, and the horror of what the Nazi's were actually doing was even worse than the picture that had been painted.

      The pictures of North Korea are in that same category. Very few people have ever been allowed in to see the country, but of those that have escaped the stories are completely consistent. North Korea is a slave state, still officially run by a dead man. A nation whose forced labor camps are so cruel, that attempting to catch mice for food is a punishable offense. This isn't a propaganda picture, it is the exact same account given by every single person that has ever managed to escape it's horror.

    41. Re:Good for everyone by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      You're calling someone who just defended prison sentences for those that cross a border illegally a lefty ?? Are you fucking serious?

    42. Re:Good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Concentration camp usually refers to a camp for humans. Jawas don't rise to that level.

    43. Re:Good for everyone by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Troll

      What I am saying is that idiots that believe that North Korea is just another country. No better no worse than others is a fucking left wing nut job. So I pointed out the inconsistancy of that type of thought.
      So. Yes. I am serious.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    44. Re:Good for everyone by mjwx · · Score: 1

      This is happening today in places like Thailand and Iran.

      Dead on about Iran, especially after having Persian Rap translated to me by an Iranian born Aussie (it was almost as bad as English Rap and production of "western" forms of music is banned in Iran, which includes Rap).

      Thailand is a very different situation and far more complex. The conflict between the red-shirts (mostly rural Thais) and the government is a very old conflict between rich Thai's. The main bankroller of the red shirts was ousted PM Thaksin Shintarawa who was overthrown by a military coup in 2007 and stripped of all his assets in Thailand, his party was re-elected in 2008 and ousted by the yellow shirts (mostly mid-upper class Bangkok residents) in 2009 after they took over the Bangkok international airport. The current government is the result of that. Back to the point at hand, for both sides there is a lot of corruption, both literally paid people to protest both at the BKK international airport and the more recent Silom protests. The current Thai government is far from oppressive and the red shirts are far from the liberating hero's although this represents a division that has always existed between rural working Thai's and urban middle class Thai's. If the red shirts had of toppled the current Thai government, Thaksin Shintarawa would have returned to rule and there'd be just as much corruption as before, just a different kind of corruption. Thailand is a country that has had 20 coups since 1932 when the Monarchy gave up absolute power and things will only get worse when the current King dies (which is likely to be soon). Often, Thai Democracy is just rich Thais fighting each other, that is definitely the case with the latest protests, Shintarawa wants his assets back.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    45. Re:Good for everyone by boutell · · Score: 1

      Okay, so what should we do with North Korea, exactly? They have nuclear weapons, complete control of the information available to their populace, a crumbling food production system and a huge army as well as hordes of mortars aimed at Seoul. Good luck...

      I am a constant critic of my own country's policy but when it comes to North Korea I rarely point the finger because I really don't know what can be done.

      (I made an exception when Bush actually taunted them without the slightest ability to back it up. THAT actually managed to make matters worse, which is an accomplishment.)

      --
      Check out the Apostrophe open-source CMS: http://www.apostrophenow.com/
    46. Re:Good for everyone by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I have to say that all my independent looks at North Korea through the eyes of non-American news sources have always concurred with what American news sources report: that North Korea is a prison for starving, brain-washed, frightened Koreans who are subject to cruel rule by a paranoid despot that truly is a bad person. I disagree that the US paints a worse picture than what's true. I will boldly and notorious say that the US paints a rosier picture than what is true for lack of not discussing North Korea enough.

      News Corp should be punished harshly for doing any business with that despot. North Korea is one government that should routinely be fucked with. It isn't the stabilizing regional force that Saddam Hussein's Iraq was. North Korea has more in common with Sudan and Somalia.

    47. Re:Good for everyone by fanmaoyiyi · · Score: 1

      Dear sir/madam, Having obtained your name and address from the Internet. We are writing to you in the hope of entering into business relations with you on our mutual benefit basis. We are engaged in shoes,dvd,watch,glasses,hat and so on.you can retai and whloesale.If you are interested our products, replicahandbagyou can sign in to the address,and then send message and calling for me. Your early reply will be highly appreciated. Best wish for you Tel;13950756204 MSNfmaoyi@yahoo.com Web: www.replicahandbags-mall.com http://www.abuydvd.com/ http://www.newsoftware-mall.com/ www.getchristianlouboutins.com www.abuyugg.com

  2. No suprise here by Pojut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Murdoch owns one of the largest media empires in the world. Why wouldn't he work hand-in-hand with "the enemy"? Never mind the fact that Fox News has trounced the idea of speaking to dictators...but doing business with them is a-ok!

    1. Re:No suprise here by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Same with China.
      Rants on Fox over democracy and freedom, $ in reality.
      http://www.slate.com/id/2184197/

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:No suprise here by hedwards · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you get technical about it, his ownership of Fox was completely illegal when he bought it. It wasn't until he started buying Republican politicians that he got proper permission to own media in the US. They've since gone even further and allowed him to own more than one outlet per market.

    3. Re:No suprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fox News specifically and News Corp in general exist to serve the agenda of their master, Rupert Murdoch and nothing else. It amazes me how many hate-spewing, pseudo intellectual, know-it-alls Fox news has generated in the US. Sensationalization and Fear mongering (Hannity & Beck) make for great ratings and revenue, but are they good for us as a society and do they improve humanity? If the state of discourse in the United States as any indication, the emphatic answer is "NO".

      Imagine the extent of damage of these so-called flash games on the Internet and networks connected to the Internet if they had a malicious intent, which is very sobering if you consider that Nosotek is supported by elements of the DPRK regime! I hear the sound of sucking machines diverting funds from online banking accounts to DPRK quickly changing their status from destitute to cash-rich nation. Brought to you by the not-so-good folks at News Corp.

    4. Re:No suprise here by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In all fairness, speaking to dictators and hiring some of the dictator's subjects as a labor force are somewhat different things.

      However, fox News pundits seem to be willing to bite the hand that feeds them, given that one of the major News Corp owners is also a big financial backer of the "Ground Zero Mosque".

    5. Re:No suprise here by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, speaking to dictators and hiring some of the dictator's subjects as a labor force are somewhat different things.

      In North Korea, the difference is not so large. It's no garden-variety dictatorship, it's a totalitarian state.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    6. Re:No suprise here by dakameleon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Murdoch became a naturalised US citizen on 4 September 1985, before he bought the Fox predecessor in December of that year. So not by much, but still legal.

      (and this is one instance where the no-newspaper-and-tv-network-in-one-market rule here in Aussieland works pretty well)

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    7. Re:No suprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Murdoch owns one of the largest media empires in the world. Why wouldn't he work hand-in-hand with "the enemy"?"

      Do you really think HE did this on purpose? I'd say it was just one of the holding companies and until this information came out, he probably didn't know.

    8. Re:No suprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not strictly true, it's NewsCorps ownership that mattered not him personally. That was the reason behind the FCC investigation and his purchase of Metromedia was in May that year, they delayed the 'official' handover a year, but that was so that Reagan could give him citizenship.

      He's an extremely dodgy man, and his Fox takeover of the Republican party via the Tea Party movement is typical of the man.

    9. Re:No suprise here by Pojut · · Score: 1

      The man's entire media empire heavily condemned Obama for suggesting that we talk with dictators around the world.

      I don't think he would miss his own company conducting business with one of those dictators. "Money from North Korea" kind of jumps off the page in a tally sheet, know what I mean?

    10. Re:No suprise here by howlatthemoon · · Score: 1

      One amendment... News Corp doing business with North Korea is a-ok. They would roast any other company doing so.

      Think about how Fox News would treat a company that has significant ownership by a Muslim stockholder with that stockholder donating to the group building the Cordoba Center (the one Fox News called the "gound-zero mosque"), and deals with North Korea. My guess is that their description would hint at terrorism. If you have not guessed what corporation might fit this description, that's right, News Corp.

    11. Re:No suprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does "Fox News Co-owner is Funding the Ground Zero Mosque" yet despite pointing out the guy was a Saudi prince Fox News just never could find out the dude's name and make the connection. Face it: Murdoch is an evil fuck who thought he could save a buck by hiring North Koreans. The fallout is negligible since his viewers will never know about it and he's much too important to the Republican Party for them to let anything happen to him.

    12. Re:No suprise here by hey! · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not to mention that the supposedly jihadist Saudi prince who is the bogeyman in Fox News' account of the "ground zero mosque" is never named because he is a close business associate of Rupert Murdoch with connections to the Bush family. Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is never mentioned by name, because a quick google search would show he owns 7% of ... Fox News.

      So, by the Fox News argument that we should oppose the Cordoba House project because it is funded by jihadists, we should boycott Fox News because its revenues *go into the pockets of the very same alleged jihadists*.

      Of course that argument is dependent on the assumption that Prince Alwaleed supports Al Qaeda, for which there is no evidence, whether you are trying to draw a connection between Cordoba House and Al Qaeda or Murdoch and Al Qaeda. It's all bullshit which none of the people who matter take seriously.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:No suprise here by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Look, some restrictions on countries are stupid. Our Cuba restrictions are nonsensical.

      About 25% of Cubans work in the private sector. If we legalized trade with them, and only them, soon more of them would be. The private sector would grow, or, alternately, people would soon be demanding it does and the government would get less support. No trade with the Cuban government, or the government's socialized industries (Which currently means no cigars, as none of that is private.), but no trade at all is stupid. We could use trade with Cuba's private sector as a wedge to loosen government control, but a bunch of Cuban expats think incoherently on the issue and Florida is a swing state.

      It is socialism. People work, they get paid, they buy stuff. They just usually work for the government, and buy from it, but there's an actual functioning economy. It's one that's mostly designed by the government, but there's private hands that money can go.

      Meanwhile, not only is there no private North Korea sector at all, except for the private small farming sector they had to quietly allow to keep people from staving. People don't actually get paid for working at all. You do what the government says, and in turn it feeds you. It's actual outright communism, not the socialism that most 'communist' countries quickly start working under. North Korea does not functionally have any monetary exchanges at all.

      There's a difference between 'The government does not practice much justice or allow free speech and had a large thumb on the economy' vs. 'The government uses the population as slaves and there is no freedom at all'. In Cuba, if you do not show up at work, you get fired. In North Korea, you get shot.

      Which means FOX IS PAYING MONEY TO THE NORTH KOREAN GOVERNMENT TO USE THEIR SLAVES.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    14. Re:No suprise here by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      In Cuba, if you do not show up at work, you get fired.

      I don't know about Cuba, but many of the jokes people living in the eastern bloc made were about low work morale. I don't think they got fired that easily, unless they slacked so much they were actually seen as troublemakers :)

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    15. Re:No suprise here by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      Imagine how low wages would be in a country where no one has money, and anyone who does still can't afford food... I assume it's typical exploitation of labor rather than Murdoch doing something sinister.

      For doing things that are contrary to the interests of the United States, it's much easier to use Fox News to generate worldwide animosity toward the US and its interests. Why bother trying to use a 3rd world country with tiny (50kT) nukes when worldwide opinion is so much more damaging?

    16. Re:No suprise here by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      The FCC Investigation was in 1995, and the fact of the investigation and the laws around television network ownership possibly demonstrates one of the most egregious hypocritical stances of American "free trade" - protectionism at home through tariffs and legal restrictions while fighting for unrestricted access abroad.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    17. Re:No suprise here by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Well, the point is, people in Cuba, like people almost everywhere, can either go to work and get paid, or not go to work and get fired.

      Yes, Cubans have to have permissions to 'change' jobs, as people confusing put it, which actually means they need the government's permission to get another government job (duh), which is about 75% of all jobs. And getting a business license is near impossible, so people can't really strike out on their own.

      So, all told, it's not a very free society.

      OTOH, a lot of the 'employment' is simple make-work, honestly. According to the Cuban government, as many as one in five people employed by it are probably useless.

      So a lot of 'jobs' in Cuban operate, essentially, as unemployment insurance you collect by standing around all day. Part of the Revolution promised 'full employment', and by God, they have full employment. 'You need a job, comrade? Your job is to stand here holding this shovel until that guy needs it, then take it back when he doesn't.'

      There is a Cuban joke: 'We pretend to work, and they pretend to pay us.'.

      That's why they need 'government permission' to change jobs...because, frankly, if someone needs a job they just invent one for them to do. There aren't any unfilled jobs just floating around. It's a somewhat stupid way to run a society, but whatever.

      And there are actual private businesses that operate like in the real world. Hiring workers, buying goods, selling them, etc. Not as many as there could be, the government is stingy with licenses, but certainly enough to create some trade basis, and create a class of people demanding more licenses.

      What Cuban is not is is not slavery, which is what is going on North Korea, and you really will, honest to God, get shot if you quit your job.

      Yet for some reason it's legal to 'trade' with North Korea for non-military stuff, despite the fact that all North Korea stuff is manufactured by forced labor, and every penny goes straight to North Korea (Because North Korea doesn't even use currency for the most part, or at least pretends it doesn't.), and yet not legal to purchase stuff from Cuban's private sector.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  3. The rug is not the issue here by alphatel · · Score: 0, Troll

    Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski Bowling if you knew it was created in North Korea?

    When the chinaman pisses on the rug at gamestart, do they insert a South Korean?

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:The rug is not the issue here by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Cast it from thy sievelike books of memory, Sir Donald; thou art out of thy element.

    2. Re:The rug is not the issue here by alphatel · · Score: 1

      Cast it from thy sievelike books of memory, Sir Donald; thou art out of thy element.

      I certainly hope Rupert doesn't make them roll on the Shabbos!

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  4. Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Dude abides.

  5. Re: Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski. by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    The Dude abides.

    ....Juche?

  6. Programmers by DarkIye · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having coded ActionScript, I can say that the claim their programmers will be improving their skills with the experience is bollocks.

    1. Re:Programmers by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having coded ActionScript, I can say that the claim their programmers will be improving their skills with the experience is bollocks.

      Maybe its a step up from VB but its not going to turn them into elite hackers over night.

      I did wonder about flash based spyware. Could a flash app take a picture from a webcam then phone home?

    2. Re:Programmers by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I did wonder about flash based spyware. Could a flash app take a picture from a webcam then phone home?

      Only if you allow it to - or if your laptop was supplied by an American school board.

      Sure, they can steal some flash cookies. But you already use a cookie blocker that takes care of both flash and regular cookies, right?

    3. Re:Programmers by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I did wonder about flash based spyware. Could a flash app take a picture from a webcam then phone home?

      Depends on if you read stories in the /. fire hose or read the articles they link to.

    4. Re:Programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a commercial coder for the last 20 or so years, I must ask what the fuck are you talking about? ActionScript is nothing like 'a step up' from VB.

      In addition to the standard day to day C++, less often C, occasional assembly and (shudder)xcode on that funny platform, I've coded extensively with ActionScript and VB through their numerous different versions. ActionScript provides nothing like the functionality VB. In fact, I'd go as far to say that even the older-school VB's (like 4, 5, 6) are still more functional than ActionScript is today.

      ...Or maybe I missed the class on ActionScript being able to make OS and other subsystem API calls? Build filtergraphs? REAL hardware accelerated 3D through directx? ...and don't forget: ActionScript feels like it's stuck together with chewing gum.

      Seriously, if you don't already know to use the right tool for the job, just stfu. 'Step up' pfffff!

  7. Rupert Murdoch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Terrorist and AMERICA hater.

    He is a traitor and must be dealt with severely.

    I say we should find some backwards, barren, outoftheway continent with a bunch of freaky animals to send him to...but where?!? Where?!?

    Does anybody know of such a place?

    1. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      I say we should find some backwards, barren, outoftheway continent with a bunch of freaky animals to send him to...but where?!? Where?!?

      Antarctica?

    2. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      That bastard has already ridden the wave and he's now a very old man. He's had a lifetime to cause trouble and enjoy his mostly-ill-gotten gains, and is now even worse, because he retains his power, while going senile.

      He should have been dealt with decades ago.

    3. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it can be helped, not back in Australia, please.

    4. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murdoch or Kim?

    5. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Can't it be both?

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    6. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That bastard has already ridden the wave and he's now a very old man. He's had a lifetime to cause trouble and enjoy his mostly-ill-gotten gains, and is now even worse, because he retains his power, while going senile.

      He should have been dealt with decades ago.

      That wasn't 'Nam, benjfowler. There were rules.

    7. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I say we should find some backwards, barren, outoftheway continent with a bunch of freaky animals to send him to...but where?!? Where?!?

      But we already did that, in 1985.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Glad you asked! I know of such a place!

      Right here.

    9. Re:Rupert Murdoch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I speak for all Australians when I say, "We don't want him back!"

  8. Kim Jong Il or Rupert Murdoch? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Frankly, I'm more concerned about News Corp than I am about North Korea.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:Kim Jong Il or Rupert Murdoch? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I'm more concerned about China than either. And the U.S. government certainly doesn't seem to have any problem with U.S. companies exporting all their computer jobs there.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Kim Jong Il or Rupert Murdoch? by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 2

      From a national security standpoint, I'm more concerned with Pakistan than Iran, NK, or anyone else. The majority of experts agree that the most likely national security threat to the US (I'm talking about academics and foreign policy experts, not politicians) is the potential for a radical element to get its hands on Paki nukes. Iran doesn't even have the bomb yet, but we keep on focusing on them, in the meantime, Pakistan has enough material to produce 60 to 100 weapons grade nukes...

      --
      "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
    3. Re:Kim Jong Il or Rupert Murdoch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or letting government contractors use computers made over there...

  9. Feel Differently by necro81 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski Bowling if you knew it was created in North Korea?

    Well, considering I feel that flash games are an idiotic waste of my time, this revelation doesn't change matters much.

    1. Re:Feel Differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski Bowling if you knew it was created in North Korea?

      Yes, definitely. Companies in the U.S and the U.S government have influenced the laws in my country in a way that reduces my freedom. If I knew that I would support North Koreans that have done nothing to harm me instead of supporting American voters that put the dirtbags in charge then I would have a lot more happy feelings for that game.

  10. It could become a military issue. by broknstrngz · · Score: 1

    If they decide to do Minesweeper #2.

  11. Question: Is it illegal? by wonkavader · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it currently illegal for a US company to trade with North Korea?

    Is it illegal for a multi-national which does business in the US to do so?

    1. Re:Question: Is it illegal? by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doubt it. There's actually a huge amount of legal trade going across the border. There's a DMZ, but there's buttloads of trucks going back and forth over it every day.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Question: Is it illegal? by julesh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is it currently illegal for a US company to trade with North Korea?

      Irrelevant. News Corp is not a US company; it is incorporated in Australia.

      Is it illegal for a multi-national which does business in the US to do so?

      AIUI, such a company only submits to US jurisdiction for business activities that occur within the US, so I would guess not.

    3. Re:Question: Is it illegal? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. News Corp is not a US company; it is incorporated in Australia.

      Not true. News Corp was re-incorporated in Delaware in 2004.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3953407.stm

    4. Re:Question: Is it illegal? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Is it currently illegal for a US company to trade with North Korea?

      It is currently illegal for _you_ to trade with North Korea, Murdoch is a law unto himself so he and News Corp can do as they please.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  12. Would you feel differently? by joeflies · · Score: 1
    Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski Bowling if you knew it was created in North Korea?

    well based on the name and that it's flash based, I'm inclined to think that it sucks, horribly. So the answer is No, I wouldn't feel differently knowing that it came from NK because I don't beleve that will make the game any better

  13. Play some North Korean flash games here by My+Iron+Lung · · Score: 2, Informative

    I run a bit of a North Korean news aggregation and info site. I posted a few weeks ago about a state-run newspaper site, uriminzokkiri.com, that hosts a number of North Korean made flash games you can play in your browser. Some of them are actually pretty fun! Links to the games, writeup and game descriptions can be found here: http://www.reasonableman.net/archives/250 The best part is, none of the corporate web blocking apps out there are restricting a North Korean website! :)

  14. sounds like murdoch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As is always the case with Rupert Murdoch, why be content just riling up people on one side of a conflict when you can just as easily be profiting from both side? He does this time and time again, yet people always seem surprised when he does it.

  15. Would I buy? by ledow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would I buy a computer game knowing it came from North Korea?

    Break the question down before you even think about answering it - how do I know if something has been programmed in, made in, assembled in, or had any other part of its production process in North Korea, or anywhere else for that matter? Where was Doom 3 programmed? Does it use code written by slave children in India who are force-fed C++ classes instead of their normal education, paid 1p a day and beaten regularly? I have *no* idea and no real way to prove either way. Thus singling out North Korea makes no sense.

    If it is produced in North Korea, how do I *KNOW* what the funds it generates are used to support? Do you know what ID Software spent your $29.99 on? Maybe they sent it to a Gay & Lesbian support group, or funded investment in an African orange grove, or maybe they actually did use it to buy one of their employees a hand gun - you have NO idea. Thus singling out a particular company in North Korea based on accusations and vague connections makes no sense.

    If it comes to my attention that a game is produced by a company who has other actions I disapprove of, will I stop buying the game? Well, I hate Sony. I disagree with most of their actions. Their involvement on a project might well kill it off in my mind. But it very much depends on their involvement and precisely which actions we're talking about, whether they affect my morals and whether or not that should be related to some other product they are producing. I disagree with Afghanistan growing opium, but does that mean I can't buy fruit from Afghanistan IN CASE some of the drug-money was used to sow the field in the first place? Or, surely, giving them an increased trade in other, more legitimate, goods will provide them an incentive to move away from growing opium? I have no idea. Thus singling out a particular game because of tenuous links to things I may not approve it by a single company in its production chain makes no sense.

    Assuming we KNOW that this software was written in North Korea. Assume that we KNOW that every company along the line knew this. Assume that we KNOW that the North Korean's are then taking those "trained" programmers and using them to program nuclear missiles. Does that mean I'd not buy the game? Still unlikely. The production of the game didn't make them program nuclear missiles (or whatever), someone else did. At some point someone clearly crossed the boundary between making a flash game and funding cyberwarfare. That's the person who is the problem, that's the person who should be asked probing questions. That's the part that the government needs to step in and stop ALL trade with that country, not half-assed this company is "good", this company is "bad" because it employs "X" crap.

    And I take offence at the tone of the submission. Trying to make me feel guilty by association is almost entirely racism. The article is trying to paint *all* North Korean activity (including programming a video game) as somehow evil. Would I buy it? If it was a good game that I was interested in, yes. Sadly I don't have an infinite lifetime in which to research every individual, company, funding source and country involved in the production of even a minor flash game. If you have a problem with North Korea, lobby for a blanket trade ban. Otherwise, please stop spreading such rampant discrimination because a newspaper company has a flash game on its website.

    1. Re:Would I buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are not responsible for things you do not, or cannot, know. You are responsible for the things you do know. When possible, I prefer to not buy things made in North Korea (not hard to do given the dearth of NK exports) because their government oppresses my fellow Christians. Given the nature of their government, exported products provide serious support to their government. You could support trade with NK for exactly the same reason, and we'd both be right.

      Conscious reasoned actions are better than blind brain dead actions.

    2. Re:Would I buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Id Software. The proceeds of Doom III went towards Armadillo Aerospace, for the development of martian exploration and colonization equipment. United Astronomics will acquire Armadillo, which will acquire Composite Systems. The result of the merger will be UAC.

    3. Re:Would I buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing: we don't have an absolute embargo against any country, even Cuba.From http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/programs/nkorea/nkorea.pdf:

      Goods of North Korean origin may not be imported into the United States either directly or through third countries, without prior notification to and approval of the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

      I have no idea whether Murdock and company got that approval; what I do see is that approval is possible to get.

      That said,

      Would I buy a computer game?

      No, actually.

    4. Re:Would I buy? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2, Informative

      how do I know if something has been programmed in, made in, assembled in, or had any other part of its production process in North Korea

      In this specific case, you do know, so I don't see what your point is.

      If it is produced in North Korea, how do I *KNOW* what the funds it generates are used to support?

      If it's produced in North Korea, then it's a pretty safe bet that the money is used to support the North Korean government. Otherwise, the government would have never agreed to export it.

    5. Re:Would I buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      And I take offence at the tone of the submission. Trying to make me feel guilty by association is almost entirely racism.

      Racism? Really?

      Probably a quarter of the electronics in my house are Korean. My washing machine is, the optical drives in my computers are, the stereo amp is... the list goes on. I don't think twice about buying Korean goods.

      South Korean goods. Never North.

      Is that racist? Against whom, exactly? 'North Korean' isn't a race, it's a political demarcation. I'm not aware of any major genetic differences between the two Koreas having developed since the armistice, and last time I checked, a fundamental belief in genetic inferiority was the very definition of racism.

      I won't buy this game, period. I wouldn't hesitate to buy a Hyundai if it looked like the best car for me.

      Precisely whom am I being racist against?

    6. Re:Would I buy? by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      If it's produced in North Korea, then it's a pretty safe bet that the money is used to support the North Korean government. Otherwise, the government would have never agreed to export it.

      Any foreign money going into North Korea directly supports the North Korean government. It's illegal to have foreign currency in North Korea, so in order to pay workers, Rupert needs to exchange US dollars for North Korean Won (KPW), which are just colored pieces of paper. The only way to do that is through the government. KPW are essentially worthless, since whenever there is the threat of a middle class developing in North Korea, Kim voids all outstanding currency and issues new currency. So anyone with any cash (or anything in a bank account) is suddenly bankrupt, and has to start from zero like everyone else.

      I'm sure Murdoch salivates at the idea of developing such a system in the U.S. (with him as dictator, of course).

  16. I think that by MC68040 · · Score: 1

    The dude would abide!

  17. All your game are belong to us. by captainpanic · · Score: 4, Funny

    In A.D. 2010
            Flash game was beginning.

            America: What happen?
            Slashdotter: Somebody set up us the bomb.
            Operator: We get signal.
            America: What!
            Operator: Main screen turn on.
            America: It's You!!
            North Korea: How are you gentlemen!!
            North Korea: All your base are belong to us.
            North Korea: You are on the way to destruction.
            America: What you say!!
            North Korea: You have no chance to survive make your time.
            North Korea: Ha Ha Ha Ha ....
            Operator: Captain!!
            America: Take off every 'Zig'!!
            America: You know what you doing.
            America: Move 'Zig'.
            America: For great justice.

    In commie Korea, games create you!

    1. Re:All your game are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, too soon.

  18. "redefining outsourcing" by sosume · · Score: 5, Insightful

    MEMO --

    New ownership means new rules. Therefore:
    - each bug found in production code, means a month of hard labor for the responsible engineers and their entire family
    - no more internets for you!
    - each comment in your code should contain a reference to our glorious leader

    We hope these new rules will everyone more happy and more productive!

    -- K. Jong Il, VP

    1. Re:"redefining outsourcing" by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Made me think of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpF5-mBmI0c
      I code you!

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:"redefining outsourcing" by Torvac · · Score: 1

      must be great to have your own death as motivation

  19. noko by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    noko

  20. sage by nstlgc · · Score: 1

    sage

    --
    I'm Rocco. I'm the +5 Funny man.
  21. North Korea has a substantial role in animation by Froomb · · Score: 3, Informative

    Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski Bowling if you knew it was created in North Korea?"

    How would you feel about Pocqhontas and the Lion King? In some fields, North Korea has surprising expertise.

    1. Re:North Korea has a substantial role in animation by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Suddenly Flash gaming makes a whole lot of sense for them -- Flash isn't programming, it's animation + glue logic.

      North Korea will soon dominate the market, and Jobs will rebrand the iOS Flash ban as a blow for democratic freedom.

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:North Korea has a substantial role in animation by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Not that surprising. Some skills are in high-demand in a totalitarian state. I know the moment it opens up, I'm going to pick up a couple of mass demonstration coreographers for cheap.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    3. Re:North Korea has a substantial role in animation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains why Pocahontas looked more Korean than Native American.

  22. So, what will Fox News say? by DaRat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What'll be interesting to me is what, if anything, Fox News has to say about this offshoring. I suspect that if one of the other media companies would do the same thing, there would be considerable outrage. In the case of one's parent company, well...

    1. Re:So, what will Fox News say? by AHuxley · · Score: 1
      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  23. Not sure about that by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not so sure about that. From what I can gather, most of the anger against the governments in Eastern Europe -- at least after the point where Stalin died and his ham-fisted brutal oppression was replaced by a more "big brother is watching you!" kind of approach -- had to do with shortages, queues to buy just about anything, etc. And to make it seem even worse, an illusion carefully maintained by western propaganda (e.g., Radio Free Europe) that basically the western world is a land of milk and honey where there is no poverty, no problems, everyone is happy, and generally it's freaking rapture on Earth.

    But the point is, most people didn't care all that much about democracy or freedoms or such. Most except a few idealists were actually pretty ok with a sort of an implied "covenant" so to speak, that if you don't rock the boat too hard, the secret police will probably leave you alone. If you could give them enough food for their children and a decent life standard -- and maybe stop that propaganda machine, if you're now friends with their government and happy to let it manufacture your shoes and iPods -- I think most people could have lived just as happily without democracy or private initiative at all.

    You also have to understand that after Stalin keeping them in line was more based on chilling effect than anything. Stalin's brutal purges and mass executions had been replaced with a more passive-aggressive game, where the government has a dossier on you somewhere, and it's unpredictable when, if or how it will bite you in the arse. Big brother knows if you're drinking with comrade Piotr, who swears at the government lots, and you don't know how you'll be shafted by that... maybe you'll get a one-way all-expenses-paid trip to Siberia, but maybe just your kids will never get promoted past a point, or maybe you'll just never get to travel abroad any more, or maybe nothing at all if you stop it now. That uncertainty actually seems to have worked better than the Pavlovian immediate repression that Stalin used.

    The governments there also used agents provocateur big time. The more perverse implication wasn't even that that's how that dossier happens, but basically that you don't know who's one, who can you trust, and how hard a kick in the pants you can expect if you just join the first guy shaking a fist at the beloved president. If comrade Piotr can curse at communism so much and nobody did anything, hmm, maybe he's actually filing a report about your listening to him. It majorly prevented people from getting organized.

    In fact it worked so well that even a major, vocal, anti-government critic like Sakharov didn't really need to be silenced. They only "exiled" him to another major and well supplied city, he still had a job, and other than a few "we're still watching you" shows of force by the police, really he was free to shoot his mouth some more. It didn't matter any more. People didn't rally around him anyway. They had been already conditioned that you don't join someone who's that vocal, because either he's an agent provocateur himself, or he's being watched and you don't flock around him like you don't flock in front of the Eye O' Sauron. Better stay out of that kind of spotlight.

    My take is basically that if the USA and USSR had gotten over the Cold War (yeah, I know, unlikely) and started trading happily, and letting the Russians manufacture their Nike shoes and laptop batteries, and all, there wouldn't have been any changes at all. There would have been no need for the Glasnost, and no pent up frustration to blow.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Not sure about that by sourcerror · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a Hungarian I approve your post :)
      (no mod point yet, sorry)

    2. Re:Not sure about that by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      From The Patriot: "An elected legislature can trample a man's rights just as easily as a monarch." Why can't I smoke a joint in my own home legally? My rights are indeed being trampled by my elected American legislature, and it is depressing, disgusting, and rediculous.

      When I have the freedom to do anything I damned well please as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else, THEN I'll trumpet democracy, but until then I'll remain a cynic and vote against the present corporate legislature.

    3. Re:Not sure about that by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      While you raise a good and insightful point, I think I can even one up that, at least for the purpose of the point I was trying to make there. I was reading at one time about some poll about the first amendment, where it turned out that more Americans thought it means they can swear at a neighbour's party, but the government is perfectly allowed to tell them what not to say, than the number who knew what it actually means. So effectively most Americans thought they _don't_ have freedom of speech, and I don't see anyone proposing to revolt over that. So essentially I'm cynical that the Chinese or North Koreans or whatever would revolt over it, if their other needs were satisfied.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    4. Re:Not sure about that by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      Why can't I smoke a joint in my own home legally? My rights are indeed being trampled by my elected American legislature, and it is depressing, disgusting, and rediculous.

      What you are talking about is tyranny of the majority. And our founding fathers had concerns about it. It may have been one of the concerns when the Electoral College was created, it has definitely been a concern in discussions to eliminate it.

      In the US the problem is that the majority is simply the majority of people who vote, not the majority of the populous. That sets the bar pretty low. I'm personally frustrated by freedoms that are limited simply due to different views of morality. You see it with pot, which doesn't seem to be any more dangerous than cigarettes or alcohol. The recent Craiglist censorship is another case. The constant assault on adult industries. Even the bans on prostitution when you remove underage and trafficked women from the equation.

      This is a primary reason I have trouble voting for Republican even when I agree with some of their core agendas. They constantly wrap their candidacies in a blanket of morality whose only purpose is to limit freedoms of people who don't agree with them. And you seriously have to wonder about the hypocrisy of people who will trumpet military spending in the name of building a stronger nation while at the same time refusing to find a way to provide all the citizens with medical care. You'd at least think they'd want those poor peasants for cannon fodder.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
  24. A duh moment for me... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    '“Most companies are still reluctant, which we think is unfortunate,” he said.'

    Not really, why send people to a country known for arresting people and holding them until a former president swoops in and frees them? I bet that costs a pretty penny and I wouldn't want my business billed for it.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  25. Name one boycott that has worked by mbone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please name one boycott / trade restriction that has worked. We (the USA) have been embargoing Cuba for almost 50 years, Iran for 30, North Korea for almost 60 years. We boycotted the People's Republic of China for some 25 years (and that was a real strict boycott, comparable to the current one against the North Korea). And, of course, our oil boycott of Japan in the early 1940's lead directly to Pearl Harbor.

    After literally centuries of cumulative experience running boycotts and embargoes against various bad actors, have they ever served their purpose ? These are the foreign policy equivalent of the drug war - most people know that they are doing no good, but for some reason it is impossible to act rationally and admit it.

    1. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      This is something I have long wondered. Why do we keep doing boycotts and trade embargoes? It seems to me that, when you restrict trade between nations, (1) people on both sides lose (less competition/choice/availability of products), (2) the powerful will still be able to do and get what they want, (3) you make people angry, (4) you make yourself a target for fingerpointing, and (5) you are going against the idea that trade promotes peace (e.g. China and the USA going to war would be an economic disaster for both, so they are unlikely to do it). Considering that embargoes are often instituted with the stated goal of getting some foreign government to play nice, I wouldn't be surprised if they actually achieved the exact opposite of their stated goal. Am I missing something?

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your definition of 'work'.
      You could argue that they have been successfully 'politically contained'.

    3. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by julesh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please name one boycott / trade restriction that has worked. [...] And, of course, our oil boycott of Japan in the early 1940's lead directly to Pearl Harbor

      Which led directly to the US/Japanese conflict during WWII, which led directly to a change of regime in Japan that eliminated and undid the imperialist/expansionist behaviour that had been the original reason for that embargo. You just killed your own thesis with a counterexample.

    4. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Please name one boycott / trade restriction that has worked.

      The Atlantic slave trade was ended in large part because of a sugar boycott by consumers in Britain.

      South African Apartheid ended after a very long boycott. It is arguable how much the boycott helped.

    5. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Is the goal regime change, or is it to avoid supporting unethical and/or immoral behavior?

      In this particular example, is the problem that News is propping up the regime, or that News is profiting off of the reprehensible treatment of North Korean workers?

    6. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by Nimey · · Score: 1

      We banned trading luxuries with North Korea a few years ago, on the theory that it would stop the Dear Leader from keeping his generals and other senior advisers happy. It got their attention quickly and they quit doing whatever they were doing at the time.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The boycott of GE lead them to cease production of nuclear weapons.

      The boycott of table grapes lead to greatly improved conditions for grape pickers.

      The boycott of Royal Carribbean Cruises lead them to stop dumping toxic waste.

      And don't forget how divestiture from companies doing business in South Africa lead to the downfall of Apartheid.

      And these are the ones I recall before my first cup of coffee. You know, you can still use Google, even if it has those annoying balls.

    8. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The blockade against the USSR worked.

    9. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is embargos are only effective in baiting other countries into attacking us first so we can feel good about nuking them?

    10. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Please name one boycott / trade restriction that has worked.

      Iraq, by 1997 we had Saddam eating out of our hands. This is why Bush chose Iraq, it was a soft target or so he thought.

      South Africa, this took decades of embargo but things changed.

      Boycotts or Embargoes (on an international scale) are not about toppling regimes but keeping them pliable, under thumb and dependent on you. Obviously this doesn't work with Cuba, Iran or North Korea where you have powerful allies willing to step into the trade gap (read: China or Russia, also India now) but when they dont trade restrictions work. This is the same tactic the Soviets used to keep the eastern bloc in line, by controlling supply and trade they had comparatively few rebellions.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    11. Re:Name one boycott that has worked by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Except it wasn't the boycott that change the government, but a war. Apples to (holy shit that was stupid) Oranges.

  26. Nothing, really. by panda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fox News is a subsidiary of News Corp., but you know that. They won't mention it.

    It would be funny if this is illegal and Murdoch and his corporations are brought up on charges of providing aid and comfort to the enemy. It would be very funny, but it won't happen.

    I think every news network should trumpet this news. That the parent corporation of Fox News is doing business with .... Communists! And not the "good" communists in China, either, but the crazy, "We want to nuke the world," "our leader is a divinity to be worshipped," communists of North Korea.

    --
    Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    1. Re:Nothing, really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whose enemy?

      Which delusion are you under; that NewsCorp is an American corporation? Or that North Korea is considered an enemy to everyone outside the US as well?

  27. New Axis of Evil by Diamon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FOX has now been linked with North Korea and the Ground Zero Imam. They've clearly taken over Iraq's place in the Axis of Evil. When do we invade?

    1. Re:New Axis of Evil by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FOX has now been linked with North Korea and the Ground Zero Imam. They've clearly taken over Iraq's place in the Axis of Evil. When do we invade?

      Maybe North Korea will make a game that lets you bomb NewsCorp and Fox.

      Do you play the game or not? Some people would be *so* conflicted ...

    2. Re:New Axis of Evil by c0lo · · Score: 1

      FOX has now been linked with North Korea and the Ground Zero Imam. They've clearly taken over Iraq's place in the Axis of Evil. When do we invade?

      At the "News at 11" time?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    3. Re:New Axis of Evil by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      FOX has now been linked with North Korea and the Ground Zero Imam. They've clearly taken over Iraq's place in the Axis of Evil. When do we invade?

      Maybe North Korea will make a game that lets you bomb NewsCorp and Fox.

      Do you play the game or not? Some people would be *so* conflicted ...

      I'd pirate it or disable the ads to ensure they made no direct revenue off of it... then I'd get totally addicted to it.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  28. It's a complicated situation by boxwood · · Score: 1

    a lot of ins a lot of outs... a lot of wha-have-yous... a lot of strands... a lot of strands in the old duder's head.

  29. when india and is too expensive ... by Torvac · · Score: 1

    and china too complicated - get your things done in north korea. just fair ...

  30. Good for no one, except Fox and Rupert Bullshit. by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    I know many media companies have ringers on /. to catch news stories and push the corporate-propaganda. This /. topic has a few Fox-NK dogma propagandist.

    The rulers of NK are very bad/evil. NK has a large border with China and a small border with Russia. IOFW+IMFO: NK is intentionally closed and oppressive, and dummy Fox-Rupert either lies or has an agenda to assert the rights of global-companies to have their own internationally recognized Fox-Rupert State Department.

    IOW: It is a fyck US and EU, because NK has always been a China and Russia Proxy state.

    Don't eat the Fox-Rupert BS-dogma.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  31. Fox News by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Always taking shots at Fox News. By the way, News Corp owns the Wall Street Journal; National Geographic Channel; IGN; and part of Hulu. IGN is way more notable than Fox News, never mind WSJ.

  32. Frothing Moonbats by emh203 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh god, Rupert Murdoch among the moonbats at slashdot has now reached the same level of the "Illuminati" in the conspiracy nut circles.

    1. Re:Frothing Moonbats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why don't you make some "Slashdot Patriots" to fight these moonbats. They mustn't be allowed to smear good ol' Murdoch's name like this!

  33. They believe in nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say what you want about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.

  34. rupert murdoch is basically the capitalist version by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    rupert murdoch is basically the capitalist version of kim jong il, so why would he give a crap about any of this, as long as he gets the dollars

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  35. Hardly, FCC was 3:2 in favor of Democrats in 95 by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Informative

    There were three Democrats on the FCC, Reed Hundt (chairman), James Quello, and Susan Ness. The two Republicans were Andrew Barrret and Rachelle Chong. So blaming Republicans for change in ownership rules is pretty silly, typical though. It seems that too many rely on ignorance to allow their views to be supported. After all, we know the Republicans had control of Congress then, but the fact remains, they did not have a majority on the FCC.

    So if you want to blame Fox's ascendancy on anyone, put the blame on the party who held control over the governing organization that permitted the change.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Hardly, FCC was 3:2 in favor of Democrats in 95 by hey! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're mixing up the chronology here. Deliberately?

      Murdoch had to become a citizen under the old FCC rules. Once he was naturalized the FCC had no legal basis to deny his acquisition of Fox. He was just as American as any other US citizen, legally speaking.

      Ownership concentration rules were further relaxed by the deregulation provisions in the Telecom act of 1996, passed by the 104th Congress (Republican control of both houses) and signed by Bill Clinton (Democrat, DLC wing).

      The elimination of concentration of ownership regulation was completed with minimal public comment allowed in 2003, after Republicans got control of the FCC in 2001 under Michael Powell. This same set of commissioners quashed two internal studies showing the impact of deregulation on concentration of ownership, but those studies were subsequently leaked.

      So it's very clear that the current media ownership situation is almost entirely a product of deliberate Republican policies. That doesn't make them bad, but if you support the policies you shouldn't be weasely about it and claim they were Democratic policies.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  36. Pwn to Own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.linux.com/archive/articles/131059
    Flash was the vulnerability used to crack em.
    Not surprising that a scumbag like Rupert Murdock and North Korea are using flash.

    Scary, exploits was the captcha.

  37. Cynicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even a story clearly stating that News Corp. was directly funding the North Korean nuclear weapons program would have no effect on the average Fox viewer. Many wouldn't believe it and think it's a publicity stunt. Others wouldn't understand it. The ones that did believe it would think Murdoch is doing the right thing because he's helping to prepare North Korea to liberate us from the evils of the Obama administration. *sigh* I think I'm in a dark mood.

  38. Republican outrage by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real question is where is the Republican outrage that a US megacorp is dealing with a crazed nuke-happy communist regime?

    Right-wing media outlets would be all over any "liberal" organization (US or otherwise) that would dare deal with North Korea, or even the relatively benign Cuba, the rationale being that any business run in a communist country is majority-owned by the government itself so paying them therefore directly aids and abets that government.

    Hello? Republicans congresscritters and their supporters? Can I get some outrage here? Just a little bit?

    1. Re:Republican outrage by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      As a Republican, I've always thought Rupert was despicable. He's a national sell-out, including his own soul if he has one. So yes, I fully expect Fox News to cover this story. Will they ever? I doubt it. Not a single mega news corp will ever bite the hand that feeds. Not one!

      And you all thought there was still journalistic integrity? Ya right, not in my lifetime. Look up "Drive by media".

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  39. so how many hacks / trojans are in the flash games by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    so how many hacks / trojans are in the flash games they make?

  40. Calling BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry for the harsh title, but this is a complete BS. I understand that western world would like to see it this way, but the truth cannot be further away.
    The people who started the revolutions were always young people-students who were idealist about freedom. Than other idealist regime opponents joined them.

    I can guarantee you, none of the guys standing at the place, waving with lit candles would risk being put in prison and his whole family being persecuted for their whole life, just because they wanted more sorts of toilet paper in the local market. That's complete bullshit, I know, I was there.

    1. Re:Calling BS by sourcerror · · Score: 2, Informative

      When the youth has risen in 1956, Hungary still had a ham fisted dictator (Rákosi and co.).
      The Tianmen square thing was organized by students, who had lived abroad long enough to just forget where the invisible boundaries are.

      Look, Hungary was governed in the last 8 years by the same people who cracked down the 1956 revolution. (And they were elected democraticly.)

  41. Feeling different by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Would you feel differently about Big Lebowski Bowling if you knew it was created in North Korea?

    Not really; however, knowing that Rupert Murdoch makes money from it certainly does.

  42. Its like Microsoft by slapout · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is a large corporation with many divisions. Sometimes these divisions operate with competing goals. That's the way most large companies are. And when Bill Gates was CEO, there was no way he could know everything that was going on in the company. Likewise, News Corp is a company. And there's no way the Murdoch keeps up with everything that every dept is doing. Putting his name in the title of this story (instead of "News Corp" or "Nosotek") is just flamebait.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  43. MPAA to invade North Korea by JimWise · · Score: 1

    With unlicensed games based on movies like "The Big Lebowski" and "Men in Black" the MPAA is sure to invade with platoon after platoon of lawyers until North Korea completely backs down and turns over every piece of electronics that could possibly have been involved with creating the games or been touched by those who made the games. They may feel a bit of a conflict of interest about going after News Corp for their role, so they will probably settle out of court.

  44. The real reason Steve Jobs won't allow Flash by kriston · · Score: 1

    A-ha! So *this* is the real reason Steve Jobs won't allow Flash on the iPhone and iOS devices.

    --

    Kriston

  45. North Korea tourism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  46. boo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "don't bet on any right-wing tv or radio jocks under my employ will be talking or reporting on this subject! the bottom line says i'm not a hypocrite! " - r. murdoch

  47. so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sanctions aren't working and we should invade?

  48. Murdoch hates America by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    Murdoch supporting north korea proves it.

  49. Would The Dude truly abide? by I+Like+3.14 · · Score: 1

    I'm less upset and surprised about Fox's link to North Korea than I am about Fox having anything to do with the Big Lebowski. Is nothing sacred?

  50. Check your facts by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    You may be correct that News Corp may be an Australian corporation, and by way of that, out of reach of US law against aid to enemies in war.

    However, the Korean war never ended - it is simply at a truce, a cease-fire, so the countries involved can still be considered enemies. Indeed the North Korean government still considers much of the world as its enemy - including the government of South Korea.

    If you look at the list of belligerents, you'll note that Australia is indeed listed as being on the same side of the conflict as the USA and South Korea, along with a whole bunch of other countries.

    So it's not too far of a stretch to imagine the the US government (or Australian government) might suggest to News Corp that they knock it off.

    The issue is further clouded by the joint ventures that have taken place between North and South Korea, but if anything those situations cast doubt that anything of substance will be produced. Generally these have been pawns for North Korea to use in negotiations, or as a way to import manufacturing technology or materials.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Check your facts by TheSync · · Score: 1

      You may be correct that News Corp may be an Australian corporation

      Except you are wrong, as per Wikipedia, "News Corporation is a publicly-traded company listed on the NASDAQ, with secondary listings on the Australian Securities Exchange. Formerly incorporated in South Australia, the company was re-incorporated under Delaware General Corporation Law after a majority of shareholders approved the move on November 12, 2004...News Corporation's global headquarters is...[on]Avenue of the Americas (Sixth Ave.), in New York City."

  51. Flash game titles for NK games... by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Sim-Nuke
    Missile Command
    Border Defense (version of Tower Defense)
    Whack-a-Dissident (version of Whack-a-Mole)
    Great Leader (third person, role fantasy game)
    ...

  52. Die Another Day (SPOILER) by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    In James Bond's film "Die Another Day", the villain is a media mogul that is actually a North Korean hidden agent.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  53. MurDuck by sinisterish · · Score: 0

    The most polite way I can put it, Murdoch is a cunt.

  54. South Africa by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    ...a boycott helped to end Apartheid.

  55. I don't care ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... just as long as they don't piss on my rug.