Slashdot Mirror


'Eternal' Solar Plane Stays Two Weeks Aloft

An anonymous reader writes "The BBC has a story on the confirmation of the record breaking flight of Qinetiq's Zephyr UAV: 'The UK-built solar-powered Zephyr aeroplane has been confirmed as a record-breaker following its non-stop two-week flight earlier this year. The world governing body for air sports records, the Federation Aeronautique Internationale (FAI), gave Zephyr three records including longest time aloft. Built by defense technology company Qinetiq, the craft completed its two-week flight in the US in July. The company sees applications in surveillance and communications. The July feat led to Zephyr being dubbed the "eternal plane."' YouTube has some footage of the Zephyr in action."

37 comments

  1. first Xmas post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Merry Xmas, /.! XD

    1. Re:first Xmas post by sakdoctor · · Score: 2

      Well done. However you're the only person on slashdot today.

    2. Re:first Xmas post by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the first Xmas post have been approximately 12 days ago?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:first Xmas post by JustOK · · Score: 2

      the 12 days of Christmas start on Dec 25th.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    4. Re:first Xmas post by houghi · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the rest is busy consuming as required and suddenly is also nice to people they ignore the rest of the year.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  2. Free Hat! by MrQuacker · · Score: 1

    Now I have yet another excuse for why I never remove my sombrero.

  3. Also see: Vulture by CrazySailor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While Qinetiq has managed two weeks, DARPA is working on a five-year lifespan for its vehicles through the VULTURE program.
    Additional specs: 450 kg payload, 5kW payload power and flight in the 60k ft region.

    --
    -- Improve Windows - Buy a Mac!
    1. Re:Also see: Vulture by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 2

      The LEMV is way more impressive - it must stay up for a minimum of 21 days and carry a minimum of 2500 lbs and generate at least 16 KW of power - the Zephyr is a nice technology demonstration but has a long way to go to be actually useful - and BTW the LEMV airship is also built by a British company

    2. Re:Also see: Vulture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Zephyr appears to be a more useful tool for the purposes suggested. The LEMV at 250 ft long would be a much easier and more expensive target to hit even at 60,000 ft

  4. Record time aloft? by rossdee · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not even close. What about "Five Weeks in a Balloon"?

    And there have been astronauts and cosmonauts on Mir and ISS for 6 months at a time...

    1. Re:Record time aloft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it. It's all about a concept called "General Relativity".

    2. Re:Record time aloft? by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think there being air around you would be a requirement for "staying aloft." Staying in orbit isn't that hard.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Record time aloft? by Urkki · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not even close. What about "Five Weeks in a Balloon"?

      And there have been astronauts and cosmonauts on Mir and ISS for 6 months at a time...

      I think they're referring to heavier-than-air atmospheric flying machines here. And if you were just trying to be funny, it didn't work...

      But if we accept any flying contraption, then the Moon has been flying for about 4 billion years already. Those clever Swiss, they sure know how to make cheese that works like a clockwork!

    4. Re:Record time aloft? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Those clever Swiss, they sure know how to make cheese that works like a clockwork!

      And yet, ironically, I hear that too much Swiss Cheese will prevent a Swiss Movement.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    5. Re:Record time aloft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's still one type of flying that hasn't been done yet. And I think it could go for some pretty big endurance records.

      I think it'd be neat to fly an aircraft at lower altitude, but have it take advantage of a kite (either a tractor or a gyro hooked to generator) on a tether up in the jetstream. If there's enough windshear across that altitude difference, you'd have a lot more power available than any solar flier.

      Yeah, the idea of a wind-powered aircraft sounds impossible. But a study back in the 1970's said it was feasable. They just lacked the cheap and lightweight automated control systems back then which would make such a system reasonable. And such a system would require close to constant attention in order to make it work.

      I'm just wondering why nobody's tried it yet. It would be a bit more interesting and challenging from an engineering standpoint. Is it the patent?

  5. For finite values of "eternal". by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The irony abounds, even if they could go longer.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:For finite values of "eternal". by Brannoncyll · · Score: 1

      Yeah, someone needs to put a !eternal tag on this story.

  6. Now don't you all go all goey on this announcement by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    Now let's not go overboard here. The basic laws of Physics indicate that any "solar powered plane" is going to be a very iffy thing. You can only get 150 watts per square meter of wing surface, that's when the sun is shining and at right angles to the sun. So you're talking about a very slow and very underpowered airplane, with like at best some pitiful and hazardous climb rate.

    No way it could ever be certificated for carrying humans.

  7. Re:Now don't you all go all goey on this announcem by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

    No way it could ever be certificated for carrying humans.

    Oh, damn. You should tell that to the people working on the Solar Impulse.

    They'll be glad for all the work they wont have to do.

    Also, they can seek treatment for the mass hallucination of
    the 24h+ flight last July.

    We're still talking low power and relatively slow, and you are
    right that this will probably never be a way to power normal
    travel - but "it" (meaning a purely solar powered heavier-than-air
    aircraft) already has carried humans.

  8. Re:Now don't you all go all goey on this announcem by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    No one is talking about human certification - the article and the designers specifically mention it has been designed for small payloads, communications and science duties, not for passenger flight.

    Reading the article, or even the TFS where this is stated explicitly would be useful.

  9. The Record is for UAVs only by jspoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't even close to the manned aircraft record. In the 50s some nuts kept a Cessna 172 flying for more than 2 months. When the generator gave out they hoisted up a small wind generator, taped it to a struct, and ran the power in through the cigarette lighter. Now that's what I call a record!

    1. Re:The Record is for UAVs only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They needed to refuel every few hours though. They did that by flying alongside a car racing down the runway.

    2. Re:The Record is for UAVs only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ome nuts kept a Cessna 172 flying...

      http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/1999/Feb-11-Thu-1999/news/10588716.html

      64 days, 22 hours, 19 minutes and five seconds, in a 172.

    3. Re:The Record is for UAVs only by Urkki · · Score: 3, Informative

      This isn't even close to the manned aircraft record. In the 50s some nuts kept a Cessna 172 flying for more than 2 months. When the generator gave out they hoisted up a small wind generator, taped it to a struct, and ran the power in through the cigarette lighter. Now that's what I call a record!

      I was so sure you were just joking, but it's real, and honestly, compared to today's "hoist a camcorder up in a balloon or RC plane" stunts... Well, there's no comparison :-)

  10. The next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is to give lots of money to SENS so we can start working on eternal humans. Well, more eternal than two weeks, please!

  11. British built by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Defence contractor makes a high-tech unmanned spyplane using a cutting edge "5 blokes in t-shirts" launch system, truly it makes one proud to be British.

  12. Re:Now don't you all go all goey on this announcem by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, a solar-assisted, solar-charged plane might be a really good idea, if these electric airplanes ever become viable. Batteries still suck.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. If you were wondering... by martyb · · Score: 1

    I read the linked article and wondered why they stopped at 14 days. Still not certain, but it appears they made a decision to do so, instead of some malfunction or loss of elevation, according to their press release:

    QinetiQ will today bring Zephyr, its solar powered high-altitude long endurance (HALE) Unmanned Air System (UAS) back to earth after two weeks in the air - smashing a number of long-standing official and unofficial world records.

    Zephyr was launched on 09 July and is currently still flying above the US Army's Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. Today Zephyr will have been aloft for 14 nights continuously, achieving the objective of the trial and setting a number of performance and altitude records. At this point QinetiQ's Zephyr team in Yuma will bring the aircraft back to earth.

    Does anyone have further details? Were they just tired, met the design/test objectives, and wanted to process all of that? I'd think if it were "eternal", it could have just been left there flying and would still be up there today. My *guess* is that it may be unmanned, but not entirely autonomous, so it required people on-site to monitor and control it.

    1. Re:If you were wondering... by garymortimer · · Score: 2

      No its not entirely autonomous, all the pilots hold ATPL licences and are involved in flying other platforms. It met its design criteria and will fly again in the new year for longer. Type in Zephyr at http://www.suasnews.com/ and you will find a video of the take off and landing, sorry I can't seem to paste in a link here. I believe it had enough power left to fly for several weeks more.

  14. Not a record aloft, unless for solar power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys stayed aloft over 64 days in a Cessna 172... In 1959!

    http://m.aopa.org/aircraft/articles/2010/101209world_endurance_flying_record.html

  15. Not just solar; unrefuelled by fnj · · Score: 2

    Much more significant than that. It's a record for unrefuelled flight, regardless of what the source of power is.

  16. Nope; unrefuelled by fnj · · Score: 1

    Wrong. It's not a record for UAV's only; it's a record for unrefuelled flight in a powered vehicle, no matter whether manned or not, and no matter whether heavier than air or lighter than air.

    1. Re:Nope; unrefuelled by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      It wasn't unrefueled. The batteries were topped off every day.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  17. Don't click the link! by nadamucho · · Score: 1

    The video is two weeks long!!!

  18. Toy by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    The plane did not have any of the following:
    1. A payload adding extra weight and extra energy to keep aloft.
    2. Sensors to gather data. These sensors would require power to run decreasing the amount of energy going into the battery.
    3. Transmitters to sends data to the ground. Same energy drain as above.

    With all that extra energy drain will the plane stay up over night.

    I also shake my head when I see that the test is done in Summer when the days are the longest and the nights are the shortest. This way one has the longest charge time and the shortest discharge time. Try the same thing in winter when the charge time is shorter and the discharge time is longer and the plane may not stay aloft through the night. A UAV that can be used only part of the year is not very viable.

    Without an energy draining payload flown in winter all they managed to do was demonstrate a very expensive RC toy not a viable surveillance UAV.

  19. Only two weeks? by dominique_cimafranca · · Score: 1

    Eternity ain't what it used to be.