Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Researchers Develop Permanent Anti-Fog Coating

cylonlover writes "Tired of your glasses fogging up on cold days, or of having to spit in your dive mask before putting it on? Those hassles may become a thing of the past, as researchers from Quebec City's Université Laval have developed what they claim is the world's first permanent anti-fog coating. Just one application is said to work indefinitely on eyeglasses, windshields, camera lenses, or any other transparent glass or plastic surface."

146 comments

  1. Have they heard about bandages? by MrEricSir · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by atari2600a · · Score: 1

      I wonder if silicone beads work the same in goggles

    2. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      You mean those packets of DO NOT EAT that we all have laying around?

      Dunno, isn't it a short step from DO NOT EAT to DO NOT PUT IN EYES?

    3. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by atari2600a · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not like I said to remove it from it's original packaging, grind into a fine paste, & apply topically to your cornea...

    4. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't need to put them in your eyes though - build a bridge just above the nose of the goggles. Side mounted vents with a cotton cover, some kind of clip frame so you can change the sachet, and there you go. ...

      Maybe I should patent that? :)

    5. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late, just did...

    6. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Dunno, isn't it a short step from DO NOT EAT to DO NOT PUT IN REMAINING EYE?

      Fixed that for you.

    7. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except most stuff you see on YouTube doesn't actually work, just like bandages.

    8. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Why not go all the way and seal the eye socket? Just like Molly in Neuromancer.

    9. Re:Have they heard about bandages? by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Did you see all those names in the credits?

  2. Swimming goggles by lul_wat · · Score: 1

    Swimming goggles would be a go for this. Every time I see someone spitting into them in the pool I want to drown them.

    --
    Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    1. Re:Swimming goggles by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Why? Do you truly believe a swimming pool would be saliva-free if it weren't for those people?

    2. Re:Swimming goggles by itsdapead · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...but all that saliva spoils the taste of the chlorine, urine, dead skin cells and dilute human faeces...

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    3. Re:Swimming goggles by 1u3hr · · Score: 2

      Every time I see someone spitting into them in the pool I want to drown them.

      Right, Because having someone spit INSIDE their goggles pollutes the pool. Unlike those swimming with their mouths open. Or those standing quietly taking a piss.

    4. Re:Swimming goggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if you're THAT concerned about the water in your pool not being 100% pure, maybe you shouldn't go swimming in public pools in the first place.

    5. Re:Swimming goggles by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      spit is the least of your worries, you know how much piss and ass matter is in that water?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Swimming goggles by timeOday · · Score: 1

      What about people who swim vigorously enough to sweat?

    7. Re:Swimming goggles by bmo · · Score: 1

      Q: Why do they put chlorine in the pool?
      A: Because Mark Spitz

      Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all evening. Please, try the veal and tip your waitress.

      --
      BMO

    8. Re:Swimming goggles by lul_wat · · Score: 1

      I'm in denial about those two items.

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    9. Re:Swimming goggles by Plekto · · Score: 1

      That's why our grandparents were so disease and cold resistant, though. All of that time growing up at the local lake or pond with god-knows-what in it.

    10. Re:Swimming goggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about smegma? how's the denial o'meter looking on that one?

    11. Re:Swimming goggles by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Fish?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    12. Re:Swimming goggles by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      If you're sweating while underwater, the water is waaay too hot, or there's something wrong with you...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Swimming goggles by cdpage · · Score: 1

      but all that saliva in the pool is helping make your goggle less foggy too!

    14. Re:Swimming goggles by oncebitter · · Score: 1

      Long distance swimmers face constant dehydration issues while training in pools due to sweating. Of course, they also "train" by sitting bathtubs full of ice-water to acclimatize to expected water temperatures...

    15. Re:Swimming goggles by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      It's very easy to work up a sweat in water. You can burn more calories swimming than running. It's just that you usually don't notice the sweat because you're already wet.

    16. Re:Swimming goggles by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Please, try the veal and tip your waitress.

      I'd rather try the waitress and tip the veal, if you don't mind.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. sure... by YoshiDan · · Score: 2

    Just like the "scratch proof" and "anti glare" coatings they ripped me off for when I bought my glasses. Neither work!

    1. Re:sure... by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 2
      I agree about anti-glare, that wears off pretty fast, especially if you use anything but water and a lens cloth to clean your glasses.

      But the scratch proof stuff is truly magic! I had a chance to compare my eight year old glasses with some cheap glasses one of my relatives' children had, and man, was there a world of difference. And I'm not really careful with my glasses either, I've lost them tons of times when playing football or skiing.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    2. Re:sure... by YoshiDan · · Score: 1

      Mine have the scratchproof coating and they are scratched to shit and they're only 6 months old :( I'm fairly careful with them too... Not to mention that the coating bubbles sometimes; I had that problem with my old glasses.

    3. Re:sure... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Your glasses should come with a multi-year delaminating damage warranty if they come with specialized coatings.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:sure... by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      All coatings are not equal. I've had some bad ones, but the current glasses are damn nice.

      Expensive as hell though... about 500 bucks per lense. (-10.5 / -10.75)

    5. Re:sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which the industry will make sure, if you try and claim it, will cost you more than a new pair of glasses. Optometry is one big closed scam, these days. Yet another example of how noone is trying to maintain a competitive market.

    6. Re:sure... by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Dunno what they sell you, but the scratch-proof anti-glare coating of my glasses is still finee after 3 years. And I am not treating my glasses well.
      Might be a result of German customer rights. If these coatings would not last for two years, this would fall under waranty and I would demand a replacement for the glasses.

    7. Re:sure... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      My glasses are completely scratch-free, they're about 18 months old. I think the anti-glare coating is fine too.

      I'm careful-ish with them. I rarely drop them, but I often clean them just by rubbing them on my clothes. They were about £80 (or maybe £40, I can't remember if I got two pairs for the price of one), but they're only -1.25-ish diopters.

      Maybe ask friends and colleagues for a recommendation? A few people have recommended online companies (you just give them your prescription), though I haven't used one myself.

    8. Re:sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience is that it depends on the retailer. When I bought my current Specsavers glasses I asked about warranty protection should my lenses become scratched, and I was told that they're marketed as 'scratch resistent', not 'scratch proof', and so scratches wouldn't be covered.

      On the other hand, my previous pair were from D&A, and one of the lenses suffered a very deep scratch right in the centre of my field of vision just under a year after I bought them. I didn't even have to ask about the warranty (I didn't actually know about it), they offered to repair it for free.

    9. Re:sure... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Decent anti glare will last forever unless you clean with sandpaper.

      The cheap crap that is on the garbage lenses (yes if you paid less than $260.00 a lens your glasses are garbage) does wear off and smear and scratch easily. but the good stuff on the high end super thin lenses is a miracle. I even have the dirt repelling coating and it's amazing how much cleaner the lenses stay.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:sure... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.zennioptical.com/

      I get decent quality stuff on the midgrade lenses for the price the optometrist pays.. whenever I get a new set of glasses, I order 3 more sets from this place.

      Nothing like having 2 sets of spares and one set of "grunge glasses" to use when getting sweaty or really dirty to keep the expensive nice ones looking new.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:sure... by maxume · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what their manufacturing quality is, but Zenni Optical charges between $20 and $80 to upgrade both lenses to higher refractive index materials (photochromatics push that towards $180 for both).

      Even if Zenni is really bad, it seems like there might be some markup in that $520.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:sure... by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      Agreed on that, I had historically always gotten cheap polarized sunglasses and had them die on me annually from the frame breaking and the lenses being all scratched to hell even with their "scratch-proof" coating. I finally got tired of it and got a nice pair of Native sunglasses. They ran me $150 but I've never had a pair of sunglasses that was as comfortable, durable and the scratch-proof coating really works. I have had them over a year now and if I wipe them off, I can't tell they aren't brand new. (And I treated them exactly the same as the old pairs I used to get.)

      --
      AJ Henderson
    13. Re:sure... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If your prescription is -10.5/-10.75, $1000 a pair is steep but not outside the realm of feasible. $500 a pair, if that's what you meant, is cheap. (I'm a -13/-12.75.)

    14. Re:sure... by kyrio · · Score: 1

      If 'noone' is trying to maintain a competitive market, who is trying to stop him in order to create the scam?

    15. Re:sure... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      When I bought my current Specsavers glasses I asked about warranty protection...

      I nearly stopped reading at that point, but courtesy prevailed. :-)

      Specsavers, Just Spectacles and all those other two-for-the-price-of-one bandits are the biggest lot of crooks unhung. A few years back when I was more ignorant as to what to expect from an optometrist, I went to Just Spectacles (in Hay St., Perth Western Australia), when I realised my vision wasn't so great. Since my health insurance is generous, I returned the next year and bought a new set of glasses, new lenses for the old frames and a pair of prescription sunglasses.

      They fucked up every single pair. Some lenses arrived scratched, and others just did not fit the frames properly. I sent them all back twice, with the same result, then gave up and went to Abernethy Owens nearby.

      It was then that I found out that their prescription wasn't all that accurate, and that the optometrist had not performed any of the usual checks for health of the eyes. They do charge like a wounded bull for your glasses, but the prescription is better and they look after you.

      I've looked at buying glasses online occasionally, but while the choice of frames is sometimes adequate (never great), the choice of lens material is poor. I know it is unfashionable to say so, but you get what you pay for.

    16. Re:sure... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Decent anti glare will last forever unless you clean with sandpaper.

      Incidentally, by far the best way to clean your glasses is not to bother with any of those stupid little spray-bottles or wipes.

      Simply use warm dihydrogen monoxide straight from the tap with a good hand soap and your fingers to clean lenses and frames, rinse and wipe off gently with a Kleenex (and NOT scratchy recycled paper loo-roll).

    17. Re:sure... by Plekto · · Score: 1

      That said, modern *glass* lenses are almost as lightweight and thin as plastic and don't require any coatings. I'd not recommend it for sports, but it is still an option, though the optometrist won't like to sell them as they hardly make any money off of them. As a bonus, you don't need UV coating either. Glare can be a problem, but a lot of that is mitigated if you get photochromic lenses. These are made by Corning and are better than the plastic "Transitions" brand - but are a bit more money.

      IME, the photochromic glass works better, last longer, and provides better color fidelity than plastic. But at $200 or so for the lenses, it's not cheap, either. Of course, not having to ever worry about sunglasses is a nice trick. ;)

    18. Re:sure... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I have to use a clean cloth. Anything else usually leaves a fine smearing of oil (enough that I can see it). Drives me insane.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    19. Re:sure... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... best make sure the tissues you wipe them with are not lotion-treated, else you'll get nice lotion/oil smears all over your nice and clean lenses.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    20. Re:sure... by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      25% sales tax can be rough ;)

      But yes, it is 500 per piece of plastic.

    21. Re:sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zenni is great, but trying to figure out the bridge measurement is a hit or miss thing, and can result in miserably uncomfortable glasses. I guessed wrong on that, and on my IP distance, but that's not Zenni's fault. Husband bought 4 pair from them that were absolutely perfect.

    22. Re:sure... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I use the old HAAAAAA .... wipe with shirt, other lens HAAAAA ... wipe with shirt. No noticeable scratches, maybe small ones I don't notices. Anti-reflective coating seems fine and although I can grease up a lens like crazy (oily skin) this seems to work well if I apply enough pressure while wiping with said shirt. Lenses are expensive and high power.

      Now if I could just find someone who still offers cable temple glasses for adults.

  4. Uhm... by Superdarion · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    The actual anti-fog coating itself is composed of polyvinyl alcohol, which is a hydrophilic compound that causes the individual droplets of condensation to disperse

    Unless I'm waaaay off, I think they mean hydrophobic, as in "it doesn not bond with water".

    1. Re:Uhm... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 5, Informative

      From TFA:

      The actual anti-fog coating itself is composed of polyvinyl alcohol, which is a hydrophilic compound that causes the individual droplets of condensation to disperse

      Unless I'm waaaay off, I think they mean hydrophobic, as in "it doesn not bond with water".

      Um, you are, indeed, way off.

      A hydrophobic coating would cause condensation to coalesce into droplets minimizing contact area between the condensate and the surface. In other words, it would fog the surface: due to refraction and internal reflection, small water droplets in air are essentially opaque while large droplets act as distorting lenses.

      A hydrophilic coating, on the other hand, causes the condensation to form a continuous film maximizing contact between the condensate and the surface. This would remain transparent and would not greatly distort images viewed through it unless the amount of condensate was very large.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    2. Re:Uhm... by eggled · · Score: 1

      Yup. you're waaayy off. It's hydrophilic. Hence the "dispersing" and not "beading" of the water on the surface. Hence the anti-fog capabilities.

    3. Re:Uhm... by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Ahh, learned something new today. Thanks. :)

    4. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA:

      The actual anti-fog coating itself is composed of polyvinyl alcohol, which is a hydrophilic compound that causes the individual droplets of condensation to disperse

      Unless I'm waaaay off, I think they mean hydrophobic, as in "it doesn not bond with water".

      You quite sure they don't mean hydrophobic, as in "rabid like a mad dog"?

    5. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not intended as a commercial plug, just recounting personal experience.

      There are several a hydrophobic products for car windshields which work wonders. Try them if you can. After applying them the rain does not wet the windshield and requiring the wipers to scrape off the thin layer. Instead, the rain beads up and literally blows or runs off of the windshield, leaving most of the surface dry and clear, at least until another raindrop hits. The products are so effective that when I use them I can generally drive in rainstorms without using the wipers. The distortion caused by the wipers smearing out the water is, in my opinion, worse than that caused by the raindrops. However, do not ever think that putting that stuff on a bathroom mirror will cut down on the fog from the shower. As previously noted, it just causes the fog to become even more dense.

    6. Re:Uhm... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      In my experience, these wipe on products work great, until they stop working and need to be reapplied, then the windshield gets very "smeary" in the rain.

  5. wintersports and motorcycles by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    PLEASE!!!

    I'm one of those people who perspires walking in a blizzard.

    I would pay quite a bit more for a working anti-fog coating than anything that is currently on the market, since they don't work very well for me. I need my snowboard-riding goggles, my motorcycle face shields (and, yes, I have ridden with snow all around; just don't ride on ice) , and ALL of my sunglasses coated.

    1. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even have to be snowing or cold enough for snowing for motorcycle face shields to fog up. If it's cold enough that you can "HAH!" onto a window and have it fog up, eventually your face shield is going to fog up. (Especially, while stopped!)

      Anti-fog for motorcycle face shields is a SUPER must have in any weather at about 50 or colder.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    2. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by dltaylor · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. (oh, you did).

      I very often ride with the smallest face shield opening the helmet will latch. Still get fogging on the sunglasses underneath, though.

    3. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      Fog City laminates have never failed me. They aren't generic fits, though.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by Inda · · Score: 1

      Motorbikes -

      I used to wear an open face helmet, with removeable chin guard, foam face protector and googles. The idea was to keep my warm breath off the clear plastic I looked through. Think motor-X style.

      No way perfect but better than a full helmet.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Then buy the stuff we use for motorcycle helmets. I use "cat crap" and it's fantastic.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make no mistake, this was invented for hockey visors. We are talking about Canada here.

    7. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Anti-fog for motorcycle face shields is a SUPER must have in any weather at about 50 or colder.

      My face shield almost never fogs up at 50 degrees C.

    8. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those people who perspires walking in a blizzard.

      You should stop walking in blizzards then. *nods sagely* *smokebomb* *flee*

    9. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 2

      Try Scott No-Fog cloth. Any cycle shop should carry it. You fog up the shield/goggles with your breath and then wipe it dry with the cloth. I've tried everything on the market and nothing compares. The semi-pro off road racers I've met use Rain-ex on the inside of their goggles, but even that didn't work for me.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    10. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It's got nothing to do with the temperature, it's just that as the temp gets lower the carrying capacity of air gets lower and you get more condensation on the shield. I've personally seen my helmet fog up when the whether was well into the 80s. Which is why I promptly bought a permanent fog proof lens for my helmet.

      Which is also why I'm a bit surprised that /. is this many years behind a permanent fog proof coating being developed. I got mine from Pinlock

    11. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's got nothing to do with the temperature, it's just that as the temp gets lower the carrying capacity of air gets lower

      So it has everything to do with the temperature then?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, that should save me having to ride with my visor up in cold ass weather.

    13. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. (oh, you did).

      I very often ride with the smallest face shield opening the helmet will latch. Still get fogging on the sunglasses underneath, though.

      I picked up a smoked face shield, it lets you ride with the smallest face shield openning, _and_ have sunglasses.

      Also, I found not putting my head sock up over my nose keeps the moisture from being blown back up into my sunglasses/glasses. (I have to wear glasses any time I am driving/riding, so moisture on those REALLY bites.) Of course, this also means your nose will freeze a lot, but at least you'll be able to see.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    14. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      It's got nothing to do with the temperature, it's just that as the temp gets lower the carrying capacity of air gets lower and you get more condensation on the shield. I've personally seen my helmet fog up when the whether was well into the 80s. Which is why I promptly bought a permanent fog proof lens for my helmet.

      well, I've really only lived in two places: New Mexico, and Seattle. Both have a pretty consistent water saturation of the air... (NM being almost no where near, and the later being almost always above) So, I'm really only used to temperature being the variant, but now that I remember/realize that other people live in places with varying water content of the air, yes, you're totally right.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    15. Re:wintersports and motorcycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same, and it works on the street, but it's oh so fun when high speed slams the visor shut on a track day as you're braking for a corner. Poof, visor covered in fog, where is that corner again?

  6. Talk about perfect timing by Tigger's+Pet · · Score: 1

    I've just got out of my shower and can't see through my living-room windows as they've all fogged up. On the plus side - it's cold and wet outside, and I can't see it anymore!
    However, to get back on topic, I think this is a seriously cool bit of tech if they can pull it off cheaply enough to enable it to be used widely. How many times have you got in your car in the winter, cleared the snow, turned the heaters on and promptly found that every window in the vehicle steams up so you can't see anyway - how useful would this be? Hell, I'd quite happily pay to have this coating added to my car - much better use of my money than tinting the windows.

    1. Re:Talk about perfect timing by mcvos · · Score: 2

      I've just got out of my shower and can't see through my living-room windows as they've all fogged up.

      That's incredibly convenient if your neighbours live close enough to look into your living room.

    2. Re:Talk about perfect timing by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      If your heater is working, shouldn't the windows clear quickly?

      much better use of my money than tinting the windows

      If it snows enough that you need to clear it off your car, you probably don't need tinted windows in the summer.

    3. Re:Talk about perfect timing by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Well, you don't really NEED tinted windows ever.

    4. Re:Talk about perfect timing by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      In cold climates it can get quite hot in the summer.

      Compare:
      http://www.theweathernetwork.com/statistics/CL6158350/caon0696 - Toronto weather
      http://www.theweathernetwork.com/statistics/C02744/usca0982 - San Diego weather

      The summer highs aren't that different.

    5. Re:Talk about perfect timing by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      25 C isn't hot; it's barely even warm - and those temperatures in SD are from the airport, which is right on the (cold) water. Yes, it does occasionally get very hot in Toronto, but then again it occasionally snows in Montgomery, Alabama. A better comparison would be to, say, Las Vegas, where the average summer high is about the same as the record high for Toronto. Latitude is also important - outside temperatures are much less important than the intensity of sunlight shining in.

    6. Re:Talk about perfect timing by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      *shrug*

      It's all relative. It does routinely get hot in the summer around here. Hot enough that some people find their cars more comfortable if they tint their windows.

  7. Problem is dirt by snsh · · Score: 5, Informative

    The difficulty with anti-fog surfaces is keeping it clean. For glasses/sunglasses this isn't so hard since you can easily clean the lenses in a sink with soap. For the inside surface of a car windshield it's a totally different story. In most cars the inside windshield fogs up mostly because it's dirty. The windshield glass itself is hydrophilic enough that it wouldn't be fogging up a lot, but there's a layer of goop on the glass that's hydrophobic which fogs up easily. The goop resembles a mix of everything you ever smell inside the car (new car smell, old car smell, exhaust fumes, McDonalds, Starbucks, bad breath). If you try super-thoroughly cleaning one half the windshield, and not clean the other half, you'll get an idea of how bad it is.

    1. Re:Problem is dirt by jamesh · · Score: 2

      If you try super-thoroughly cleaning one half the windshield, and not clean the other half, you'll get an idea of how bad it is.

      Got any tips for cleaning the glass? Whenever I try it just seems to move the layer of muck around, and I only notice that I've done a crappy job when the sun is shining in on the right angle.

    2. Re:Problem is dirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Washing up liquid. Moisten a cloth, apply a small amount of washing up liquid, scrub the surface. Repeat until the whole surface is done. Then completely wrinse out the cloth, dampen it again without any washing up liquid and clean the surface again, to get rid of any remaining dirt and washing up liquid.

    3. Re:Problem is dirt by velinion · · Score: 5, Informative

      1/4 cup vinegar, 1/2 teaspoon liquid soap or detergent, and 2 cups of water in a spray bottle.

      Spray on window, and rub vigorously with terry cloth. Works wonders.

      --
      In life, not all of your questions will be answered; all of your answers will be questioned.
    4. Re:Problem is dirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too have this same issue. I really wish I could find a way to clean it more effectively.

    5. Re:Problem is dirt by snsh · · Score: 4, Informative

      I take a bottle of standard glass cleaner (ammonia + surfactant) and 5% alcohol and 5% acetone. On a warm day in the shade with the doors open, wear gloves, hold your breath, spray on a crumpled newspaper and use that to clean.

    6. Re:Problem is dirt by somersault · · Score: 2

      I used a pack of window cleaning wipes when I bought my car (used) and it worked pretty well. I dried with a clean cloth (better to use one that isn't going to leave little fibers everywhere) after to get rid of any residue. Make sure not to get any finger oils on the part of the cloth you're going to dry the window with otherwise it will obviously just end up greasy.

      If you've got really thick muck, then I'd say give the windows a good old fashioned clean with soapy water once or twice, drying with a towel after each wash. The towel will help to collect up loosened muck that's still sticking to the screen before you go to the next layer. Then you can go with the special window wipes or glass cleaning fluid.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:Problem is dirt by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      That was a good question actually. I just recently obtained my driver's license and a car so this is something I too should probably learn. Since you've gotten already several nice responces I'm just gonna thank you for posing the question in the first place :)

    8. Re:Problem is dirt by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think the "warm day in the shade" advice is what's most useful here. The newspaper advice is BAD, though, because they don't really print newspapers worth a crap and they leave ink on your windshield. At least, any newspaper I can get my hands on does. I usually use paper towels because they are absorbent and because all my cotton rags rapidly end up greasy and thus utterly unsuitable for windshield cleaning... because I don't just clean, I fix stuff too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Problem is dirt by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's a massive, massive PITA. The easiest way to do it is to spend a lot of time getting it clean, and then just keep it clean. If your windshield's super-filthy (it almost certainly is), use Windex or detergent-water for the first cleaning (unless you have tint over your whole windscreen, in which case you skip to the next step and add lots of elbow grease). This isn't going to get it anywhere near the surgical-clean you need to keep fog at bay.

      From there, clean with a damp paper towel (don't let your fingers touch the glass!) and dry it really well with a dry paper towel (you can use wet and dry sides of the same wad once you get the bulk of the dirt off). If the outside of the windshield is freshly washed, you'll know it's clean enough when the glass looks super-clean close up. It's when your friends say "wow your windshield is SO CLEAN!"

      Now if this is a closed-cabin car and you drive with the windows up, it could stay clean enough for 6 months or more. If it's an open car, well you might have bought yourself a few weeks. On my open jeep I used a product called Fog-X by the same company that makes Rain-X, which helped keep the fog at bay a little longer, but you had to keep cleaning the windshield with that stuff so it might not be worth it if you don't live in a super-wet environment.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re:Problem is dirt by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      For glasses/sunglasses this isn't so hard since you can easily clean the lenses in a sink with soap.

      Uh, do you actually wear glasses? Mine need cleaning every day, and I'm not going to take the time to do it in a sink. I mostly use a soft cloth instead.

    11. Re:Problem is dirt by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Glass cleaners like Windex are pretty good at dissolving the goop, but damp paper towels (followed by dry paper towels or terry cloth) are needed afterward to wipe the detergent residue off. This works wonders for the windows in your house, too. And paper towels and water are really the only things I use to clean my monitor and televisions, unless there's some really stubborn deposit.

    12. Re:Problem is dirt by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The newer eco-friendly soy based ink is the problem.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    13. Re:Problem is dirt by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      $15 at a hand carwash place?

    14. Re:Problem is dirt by hawkfish · · Score: 1

      I think the "warm day in the shade" advice is what's most useful here. The newspaper advice is BAD, though, because they don't really print newspapers worth a crap and they leave ink on your windshield. At least, any newspaper I can get my hands on does. I usually use paper towels because they are absorbent and because all my cotton rags rapidly end up greasy and thus utterly unsuitable for windshield cleaning... because I don't just clean, I fix stuff too.

      I had a friend many years ago who worked construction. He said that they always used newspaper to clean the windows because it did not leave dust. I have tried this and found it to be true, but I always wondered about the ink. Still, it seemed to work and any ink residue was not noticeable, but the lack of lint most definitely was.

      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    15. Re:Problem is dirt by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Something else you might want to try is RainX. It's a hydrophobic silicone polymer that you can apply on the outside of the windshield to repel water. It works well enough that I also use it in our home on the glass shower doors to lengthen the time between us having to clean the inside of the shower.

    16. Re:Problem is dirt by operagost · · Score: 1

      OK... first define "washing up liquid".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:Problem is dirt by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I had a friend many years ago who worked construction. He said that they always used newspaper to clean the windows because it did not leave dust. I have tried this and found it to be true, but I always wondered about the ink. Still, it seemed to work and any ink residue was not noticeable, but the lack of lint most definitely was.

      They DO sell unprinted newsprint paper you know. It's the same stuff as packing paper (what packers would wrap around fragile items to protect them).

      it comes in rolls and sheets, in the same off-white color newspapers are. It's newspaper alright, but before the news is printed on them.

      And newsprint ink never dries, so even old newspapers have ink that'll run.

    18. Re:Problem is dirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Visit your local auto specialty store, or a big box retailer, and look for anything labeled "glass polish" or that contains nasty chemicals eco-friendly folk would object to. The polishing product should be rather thick and works by dissolving the crud collecting it in a powdery residue, which can be easily wiped off carrying the crud with it. As an alternative, try a past of baking soda and water. Dry thoroughly with a clean paper towel or rag.

    19. Re:Problem is dirt by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      They make an anti-fog coating as well. Sometimes I use it on the bathroom mirrors. It works wonders, for a few days. Then I get too lazy to re-apply it for a while.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    20. Re:Problem is dirt by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I have a sudden and inexplicable urge to get a pedicure.

      ::checks address bar::

      slashdot.org

      ::shrugs::

      ::schedules pedicure appointment::

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    21. Re:Problem is dirt by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Here's what I do:

      Use Windex or the like. Vinegar works too if you can hack the smell. But you want as little extra gunk in it as possible. Some window cleaners just don't hack it. Spray it on and let sit a moment. Then use newspaper to wipe off the Windex. I think that black and white pages work better than color. Then use a fresh piece to do the final polish.

      Occasionally you can get oily gunk on the outside. Then you'll want to clean with something with a lot of alcohol in it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    22. Re:Problem is dirt by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Ask for Madge - shes the best one there.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    23. Re:Problem is dirt by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I had a friend many years ago who worked construction. He said that they always used newspaper to clean the windows because it did not leave dust. I have tried this and found it to be true,

      I tried it and found it to be false. The paper left ink AND dust on my window. I think you must have a higher grade of paper, with a more toxic grade of ink.

      The best thing to clean the inside of your windshield with is a cotton towel. Or so said the veteran paint and body man of twenty-five years with whom I studied for two. The outside is cleaned with whatever you like, scraped with a silicone blade, and then touched up with the same towel. Sap is removed with a razor blade scraping in one direction and with one side of the blade only.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Canadian researchers... by a_hanso · · Score: 1

    Why is it that when the discovery is made by Canadians, it appears in the story title?

    1. Re:Canadian researchers... by Tigger's+Pet · · Score: 1

      If you read the summary;-
      "researchers from Quebec City's Université Laval" - That's in Canada
      and if you read TFA;-
      "Prof. Gaétan Laroche of Laval's Faculty of Sciences and Engineering led the research" - He's a French-Canadian.

      Hence - "Canadian Researchers Develop Permanent Anti-Fog Coating". Clear enough?

    2. Re:Canadian researchers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly because /. is US-centric? Clears any ambiguity, so when people don't RTFA, they aren't all: U-S-A! U-S-A!

    3. Re:Canadian researchers... by silanea · · Score: 1

      So everyone knows whom to blame.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    4. Re:Canadian researchers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a greater need for anti-frog systems in Canada. Something to do with all the fresh water.

      Also, if it were American researchers, the title would just name the university, with the expectation that people would know where it is. If the headline had said "Laval Researchers Develop Anti-Frog Coating", it would just have confused people.

    5. Re:Canadian researchers... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Probably because this has already been invented. I've got a really nice permanent anti-fog lens for my motorcycle helmet, and it'll easily outlast the helmet itself, which is as permanent as I could use.

    6. Re:Canadian researchers... by dakohli · · Score: 1

      Most likely this was submitted by a.....Canadian. And we Canadians are known for our fervent patriotism. Canadians are also known for having a national inferiority complex. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_cringe#Canada http://madcanuck.blogspot.com/2004/10/canadas-national-inferiority-complex.html So, whenever we do something noteworthy(or not so noteworthy) we tend to publicise our connection to it.

    7. Re:Canadian researchers... by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      National inferiority complex eh? As a kid I worked in a fast food joint in Alaska. It puzzled me that sometimes a Canadian customer would say something self-deprecating like, "Don't mind me, I'm Canadian." Or, "Sorry, I'm Canadian." And I'd be like, "Sorry for what? Here's your chicken wings."

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    8. Re:Canadian researchers... by dakohli · · Score: 1
      Yep, what did the Canadian say when you bumped into him by accident?

      "Sorry"

  9. Hate to be pedantic but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    indefinitely != permanently

  10. Why is this permanent? by jpeaton · · Score: 1

    OK, from the actual article (http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/am1010964 ), the researchers made a polymeric coating on glass surfaces. They proved that it can resist 24hrs immersion in water. how does this mean that it is "permanent"?? It could be easily removed by repeated cleaning procedures, which is the major problem with current antifog coatings as well. Secondly, the idea that it will work with ANY plastic surface is ludicrous...since they only made it on glass..I can think of many polymers it is unlikely to work with. But I don't KNOW because I did not try it either!

    1. Re:Why is this permanent? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      I suppose they mean 'permanent' in the sense that is it doesn't wear off by itself, you need to actively scrub it off to remove it. That is indeed quite a good definition of permanent in the sense that you most likely consider for example house paint permanent, but it too comes off if you actively scrub it long enough.

    2. Re:Why is this permanent? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Well they are depositing a silicon layer on to the surface, which is pretty permanent, the PEMA bonds chemically to the silicon, then the PVA bonds chemically to the PEMA. The whole process sounds pretty permanent, I suppose you could polish off the coatings if you got aggressive with the cleanings, so permanent doesn't mean impervious to any assault. You can also deposit a layer of silicon on to just about anything with the right equipment so it should go on plastic lenses too.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:Why is this permanent? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Except that there are already products on the market that do just that. I've got one for my motorcycle helmet that will out last the helmet I've got it installed in.

  11. You can't stop water condensing on a cold surface by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I used to use Rain-X anti-fog on the inside of my windshield, and the only result was that the water condensed into larger droplets, ran down the windshield behind the dashboard, and caused mold. My insurance company had to total the car because of the health hazard.

  12. Coating by ledow · · Score: 1

    No coating of any kind has ever worked on anything I've bought. I'm very careful with everything but coatings just don't last if you use the item often enough to get it dirty, need to clean it, etc. There is no such thing as a "permanent coating" when it comes to glass and plastic that are flexible enough, or under such force, that they move.

    Glass-fogging is also not a major problem except in a closed environment (e.g. a camera lens). You carry a tissue. Low-tech but it means your glasses cost less than 1/2 of what the "coated" ones cost for the 2 seconds of inconvenience maybe one or twice a day only during winter.

    However, glass-fogging is pretty easy to solve. Heat the surface. It doesn't need to be hot-to-the-touch, just as warm as the hottest air around it. This is how car demisters work and nobody whinges about them "wearing off" or "needing a reapplication", etc. It only takes a minute for them to clear the screen at best and then you don't need them for a long while after. The only reason it takes a minute is because you have to clear a huge area.

    You can buy heated gloves. You can buy heated vests. You can buy heated socks. You can buy heated hats. They are cheap, warm things up nicely, and run off AAA's. If "fogging" is such a problem in these sports/activities/uses, why not replicate the greatest, most prevalent, most effective solution known to man - the demister or "warm the surface up a bit". Anything else seems liable to just causing little puddles at the bottom of your windscreen, in your glasses / cameras etc. because the water has to go somewhere - at least if you evaporate it, it's likely to escape.

    Motorcycle visors - more than enough room and tech to warm them up a bit. Ski Goggles - same. Camera lenses - same (in fact, some do just that already). Car windscreens - gosh, wonder what we can do there.

  13. Re:You can't stop water condensing on a cold surfa by Combatso · · Score: 1

    did you also use armorall wipes on your ass? i use the defogger setting on my climate controls to clear fog on the inside of my windshield

  14. Do I want hydrophobic or hydrophilic then? by kooky45 · · Score: 1

    I cycle and it rains here a lot so I want a hydrophobic coating on my lenses so the rain runs off. But it's also often cold and humid so I don't want fogged lenses and that needs a hydrophilic coating. Which one do I really want, or do I need different coatings on either side of the lenses?

    1. Re:Do I want hydrophobic or hydrophilic then? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      do I need different coatings on either side of the lenses

      Yes.

    2. Re:Do I want hydrophobic or hydrophilic then? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      yes

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  15. The goggles... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... will finally do something!

  16. Elbow Grease by jdevivre · · Score: 1

    Use any of the other methods here, or any window cleaner, then get a clean dry cloth and work it. Push hard, polish the glass. Transparency.

    This is by far the best way to clean mirrors too, reducing the frequency of using any cleaner at all. Polishing usually does the trick.
    At the very least, it'll give some of you a little exercise.

  17. Lemme guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadian researchers eh? I'll bet the number one thing they were thinking about for this was hockey face shields.

  18. Yeah by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    I've got 99 problems, but some fog ain't one.

  19. Re:You can't stop water condensing on a cold surfa by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    "Health hazard"? Unless you're immunosuppressed or hypersensitive, mold isn't really a health hazard. If it were, the US between the Appalachians and the Great Plains would be uninhabitable.

  20. Sweet, I think by osgeek · · Score: 1

    If it splashes in your eyes, will your tear ducts stop working forever?

  21. Yes but can they.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Yes, but can they add this to a bottle of KY lube, I hate when the friction fogs up my girlfriends glasses.

  22. Oops...might be patented... by isopropanol · · Score: 1

    Pentax/Hoya has an oil resistant lens coating that's probably patented...

  23. I thought you said "Anti-FROG coating"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was wondering if they had a real bad frog problem in Canada akin to Australia's cane toads or something...

    1. Re:I thought you said "Anti-FROG coating"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Quebec.

  24. Chlorine smell = caused by poo by Barryke · · Score: 2

    In fact, when you think you smell chlorine you in fact SMELL the saliva, urine, dead skin, and dilute human feces.
    http://ezinearticles.com/?What-Causes-That-Chlorine-Smell?&id=1682675

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
    1. Re:Chlorine smell = caused by poo by Roskolnikov · · Score: 2

      I just didn't need to know that, butt thanks.

      --
      Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  25. polyvinyl alcohol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that mean I could use a little bit of fiberglass mold release agent? 'Cause that's what it is - PVA (or poly vinyl alcohol). I'll have to try it the next time I go diving...

  26. Ice Hockey Visors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is stereotypical but I think this will work wonders for ice hockey visors. The damn things keep fogging up no matter what you put on them.

  27. Its Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The true purpose is clearly for hockey face shields.

  28. Good gravy by jasno · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but who wants to rub poutine all over their nice expensive goggles?

    --

    http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
  29. Pesky frogs by jandoedel · · Score: 1

    Great! I've always wanted an anti-frog coating.

  30. Luxottica possibly! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    > The university is currently in negotiations with a major eyewear manufacturer

      Yeah who could that be!? Luxottica since they own any and all eyeglasses related companies in the world anyway.

  31. A hopeful summary, but ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    ... if you read the researcher's actual work instead of the commentary from the media (and Press Office), you'll see a lot more 'ifs', 'buts' and 'maybes' :

    We report on a polymer-based anti-fog coating covalently grafted onto glass surfaces by means of a multistep process. Glass substrates were first activated by plasma functionalization

    [From the abstract to this researcher's recent work on anti-fog coatings at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21381643%5D

    So, you're going to drag this plasma functionalization equipment around with you to stop your glasses fogging up? Or maybe not ; you're just going to have to take your glasses to the optical lab to have this "permanent" coating applied. Which doesn't sound so bad. Yet.

    The anti-fog coating was then created by the successive spin coating of (poly(ethylene-maleic anhydride) (PEMA) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) layers. PEMA acted as an interface by covalently reacting with both the glass surface amino functionalities and the PVA hydroxyl groups, while PVA added the necessary surface hydrophilicity to provide anti-fog properties.

    Uh huh ... yes ... one plastic to bond to the glass and to the other plastic ; the other plastic to provide a hydrophilic surface. (yes children, hydrophilic not hydrophobic ; this evidently works by constraining the water to form a uniform coating on the surface instead of forming irregular droplets. As a spectacle wearer with a chemist parent, I worked out this aspect of stopping my glasses fogging up long before I left home for university. It is fairly unavoidable.) The hydrophilic surface holds the water to it's surface instead of forming droplets that disrupt the rays of light more than the uniform surface of the glass does.

    Finally, following a 24 hour immersion in water, these PEMA/PVA coatings remained stable and preserved their anti-fog properties.

    So, if you put your coated glasses into water, the coating doesn't fall off. Which is a good start. And if you have to wipe dust off your glasses on a dry day? This is a very restricted meaning of "permanent".

    I do see that the researcher has an additional publication coming out imminently. bt that's what I can find at the moment. I'll carry on spitting on the lenses of my glasses and on my diving mask ; my microscope and camera optics will continue to get rinsed in alcohol, then have the grit and dust licked off them before another alcohol rinse (the tongue can detect grit far more easily than you can see. Seriously.) ; and I'll continue to breathe out of the side of my mouth while framing up a snowscape photograph, to avoid fogging the viewfinder lens.

    My hopes got raised for a few moments there.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  32. Can it be applied - by Geminii · · Score: 1

    - to elections?

  33. Canadians basically... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    got tired of wiping stuff over their hockey visors and having to clean their glasses upon entering the bar each time after going out for a smoke.

    Ingenuity at work!