Slashdot Mirror


The Machines That Sparked the Beginning of the Computer Age

jjp9999 writes "A war of spies and electromechanical machines that took place beneath the wires during World War II not only played a crucial role in the Allies' victory, but also helped spark the beginning of the computer age. Among the devices was the Enigma, a cipher capable of producing 150,000,000,000,000,000,000 possible code combinations, and a hulking machine, the Colossus, the first programmable electronic computer, capable of decoding the Enigma."

139 comments

  1. 67-bit encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What were they thinking!

    1. Re:67-bit encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, You are simply missing the 3 evil bits ...

    2. Re:67-bit encryption? by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      What were they thinking!

      Actually, 67 bits would have been more than sufficient for a symmetric cipher (which Enigma was), if the algorithm were strong, that is to say, that no successful attack against the cipher could be carried out in less time than a brute force key search attack. In fact, DES uses only a 64 bit key and it was considered good enough for banking purposes well into the 1980's, and certainly could not have been decoded by even the most powerful computers of the World War II era.

      The reason Enigma was cracked was that the algorithm wasn't truly strong, i.e. there were attacks possible that took less time than brute force. It was weaknesses in the algorithm that allowed the successful cracks to take place, but even those needed fairly strong computing power in the day. (The Enigma would be trivial to crack with an average laptop computer today.)

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    3. Re:67-bit encryption? by Stone2065 · · Score: 1

      And who would have thought it was the Poles that did it...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Cipher_Bureau

      --
      Stone
  2. Thanks for the update Big Ben by jhoegl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, everyone who is a computer geek/nerd/dork/wannabe knows this.

    1. Re:Thanks for the update Big Ben by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      No, they skip it because it doesn't run Linux.

    2. Re:Thanks for the update Big Ben by rssrss · · Score: 3, Informative

      But, this does give us a chance to recommend the excellent biography of Alan Turing which explains his role in the evolution of computer science and his role in breaking the German cyphers:

      "Alan Turing: The Enigma" by Andrew Hodges

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    3. Re:Thanks for the update Big Ben by pinkushun · · Score: 2

      My photographic memory film isn't always loaded, so it's nice to be reminded of this again :)

      P.S.
      Nerd = derogatory and not necessarily a geek.
      Dork = slang for a penis.
      Wannabe = someone pretending they know everything and thus so should everybody else.

    4. Re:Thanks for the update Big Ben by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, this does give us a chance to recommend the excellent biography of Alan Turing which explains his role in the evolution of computer science and his role in breaking the German cyphers:

      "Alan Turing: The Enigma" by Andrew Hodges

      You may want to check out "Seizing the Enigma" as well. The cipher was already broken by the Poles before the war broke up. Bletchley Park "simply" helped automate the process to it was useful.

      http://tinyurl.com/3zgwdbh
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biuro_Szyfrów
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biuro_Szyfr%F3w (for the sometimes locale challenge /. code)

    5. Re:Thanks for the update Big Ben by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. A lot of Space Nutters are utterly convinced that the only reason we have computers today is because of Apollo. There was already a worldwide computer industry in the 1960s and space was a tiny part of it. It wouldn't have changed anything at all if Apollo hadn't happened.

    6. Re:Thanks for the update Big Ben by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Wannabe = someone pretending they know everything and thus so should everybody else.

      Really? Where do you take your vocabulary lessons?

    7. Re:Thanks for the update Big Ben by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent book, a sad story of how far mankind stupidity can go discriminating one of the greatest minds of that century because of his sexual condition.

    8. Re:Thanks for the update Big Ben by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA/Apollo drove the introduction of Itegrated-Circuit-based computers. That was novel for the time.

      NASA sucked up most of the yield for IC chips for a long time in the early and mid 60s.

  3. American Crypto better than Enigma by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

    In these discussions it is common to overlook Sigaba, the American encryption machine that was significantly more secure than Enigma.

    SIGABA was similar to the Enigma in basic theory, in that it used a series of rotors to encipher every character of the plaintext into a different character of ciphertext. Unlike Enigma's three rotors however, the SIGABA included fifteen, and did not use a reflecting rotor.

    Electronic Cipher Machine (ECM) Mark II

    The ECM Mark II based cryptographic system is not known to have ever been broken by an enemy and was secure throughout WW II. The system was retired by the U.S. Navy in 1959 because it was too slow to meet the demands of modern naval communications. Axis powers (primarily Germany) did however periodically break the lower grade systems used by Allied forces. Early in the war (notably during the convoy battle of the Atlantic and the North Africa campaign) the breaking of Allied systems contributed to Axis success.

    Cryptanalysis of the SIGABA --- 3.4 Stepping Maze

    While other rotor-based cryptosystems tended to rotate their rotors as an odometer (with the last rotor moving one position per letter, and each other rotor moving one position when the rotor after it completes a full cycle), the SIGABA introduces
    an innovative concept. The movement of its cipher rotors depend on the two other rotor banks, collectively known as the stepping maze. The output of the stepping maze is not seen directly, but rather controls the movements of the cipher rotors. Thus, the SIGABA uses a hidden cryptosystem within another cryptosystem.

    The Germans that beat their heads against it referred to it as, "The big machine".

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:American Crypto better than Enigma by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Wow, I wish I had mod points. That's way more interesting than TFA. Plus, while everyone with a high school education has probably heard about Enigma, I at least had never heard of Sigaba.

    2. Re:American Crypto better than Enigma by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that, I've never heard anything about the American crypto from the 30s or 40s.

    3. Re:American Crypto better than Enigma by ortholattice · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One of the oddest things I saw in the Wikipedia article was "SIGABA is described in U.S. Patent 6,175,625, filed in 1944 but not issued until 2001". I wonder if that is some kind of record.

    4. Re:American Crypto better than Enigma by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US had networks of rich trustafarian like elites feeding back news pre ww2 and the US gov liked to read all text flowing via its private telco network ie Room 641A like.
      SIGABA was not that great, in great poverty, post ww2, England was able to tell the US of its workings in 1947 and hinted they had used some of the SIGABA ideas. The US was shocked as they thought they had "made in the USA" crypto perfection. The UK suggested working together on a better system, to cut costs in replacing its own Typex as SIGABA was in the past.
      The US said no, then Korea and the NSA changed everything.
      The US finally got crypto in the 1950's and its greatest gift to the world has been ensuring all export quality codes and devices used by friends and other nations where well known to the USA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:American Crypto better than Enigma by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      How interesting!

      This morning I got sidetracked into a past code breaking challenge that involved a substitution cipher.

      Sigaba seems like a 1-digit substitution cipher implemented on a complex rotor system.

    6. Re:American Crypto better than Enigma by kmoser · · Score: 1

      They mailed the patent application in 1944 but it took the USPS over 50 years to deliver it.

  4. Re:First post! by CTU · · Score: 0

    I hope 4chan is not down long. I hate to think what those "people" would do to the rest of the net

  5. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Cyberax · · Score: 2

    Well, you're forgetting insignificant parts where Germans invaded France and the USSR, committing crimes that make every other genocide pale in comparison.

  6. Goatse by ElementOfDestruction · · Score: 1

    Mod down...

  7. Re:The 4004!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do I suspect the above is a goatse link?

  8. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Medevilae · · Score: 1

    Well, logically- oh, nice tin foil hat. All makes sense now. Carry on.

  9. -99999 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Damn! Mod this fucker to hell

  10. Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by Covalent · · Score: 0

    In other news, Superman comics paved the way for other comics, Thomas Edison was a really awesome inventor, and the quantum world is often strange.

    Seriously, how did this get on to the main page. There is no NEWS here...

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by ProfMobius · · Score: 1

      This either not a news, or you are not a nerd.

      --
      EULA : By reading the above message, you agree that I now own your soul.
    2. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thomas Edison was a really awesome inventor

      Thomas A. Edison was a really awesome businessman, opportunist, and quite possibly the world's first patent troll. Very few of the inventions he has been credited for were actually invented by him, the person. Sometimes by employees of Edison, and sometimes these were foreign inventions, bought or outright filched, and then patented in the US by Edison.

    3. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want more paraphrased press releases from Nvidia, Facebook et al?

      Every so often it's nice to step back and get some perspective... this was the real deal when it came to tech stories.

    4. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by GrahamCox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thomas Edison was a really awesome inventor

      No, he wasn't. You've fallen for the hype (mostly created by Thos. Edison himself).

    5. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the correct term for this here is "whoosh".

    6. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      He was just the first successful patent troll. Patent trolling had become all the rage around that time and a lot of 'old money' today was born from little patents here, little patents there, etc.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    7. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by LordSnooty · · Score: 2

      Just this weekend I learned via a BBC documentary that the only reason Hollywood exists was because of the desire of New York filmmakers to get as far away as possible from Edison's patent enforcement (often through the use of hired goons to smash up equipment).

      I found it interesting that in the history of two of the biggest forms of mass media, recorded sound and cinema, Edison was there at the outset, yet his aggressive pursuit of patent infringement meant that people were forced to look elsewhere and his products failed to become the dominant technology. A lesson for modern patent trolls.

    8. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Sometimes by employees of Edison, and sometimes these were foreign inventions, bought or outright filched, and then patented in the US by Edison.

      So we can agree that he invented patent trolling?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Um...isn't this NEWS for nerds? by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Thomas A. Edison was a really awesome businessman, opportunist, and quite possibly the world's first patent troll. Very few of the inventions he has been credited for were actually invented by him, the person. Sometimes by employees of Edison, and sometimes these were foreign inventions, bought or outright filched, and then patented in the US by Edison.

      So pretty much like Gates and Jobs then?

  11. Colossus was *not* used to break Enigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    IIRC Colossus was used to break the Lorenz ciphers, not Enigma. BP were using the Bombs with menus for Enigma.

    1. Re:Colossus was *not* used to break Enigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops, that should have been "bombe" not "bomb". Good info here:

      http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/content/machines.rhtm

  12. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by nickovs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sadly, while the poster is clearly trolling with his deliberately lopsided history, the US did put well over 100,000 Japanese Americans into internment camps. These camps, while offering better conditions in most respects, bore far too close a resemblance to concentration camps for anyone with a conscience. look it up is you need to know more.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  13. Re:First post! by Unoriginal_Nickname · · Score: 1

    Don't worry. There are lots of places on the internet for 24 year old basement dwellers to talk about childrens' toys and Japanese childrens' television.

  14. Re:First post! by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

    Haters gonna hate. I don't judge you for doing whatever the fuck it is you do, so leave my anime out of this.

  15. oooooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    also, apparently you can the internet on computers now [Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net]

  16. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    If I wasn't completely sure that you are a lying troll, I would correct your mistake and say you probably meant internment camps

    Get a grip on a dictionary. An "internment camp" is the same thing as a "concentration camp", neither requires torture, slave labour, or genocide for the term to be applicable. However both require the prisoners to be selected on the basis of ethincity and/or political persuassion.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  17. Why no Colosson? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 0

    Colossus was listed, but why not Colosson?

  18. Book by PPH · · Score: 1

    For those who want to do a bit more reading on the subject (of the Bombe machines, Colossus, etc.), there's Colussus: Bletchley Park's Greatest Secret by P. Gannon.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  19. Enigma emulator on linux by ProfMobius · · Score: 1
    Speaking of Enigma (or SIGABA from a previous post), does someone knows any good emulator/decoder for Enigma on linux ? I found this http://users.telenet.be/d.rijmenants/en/enigmasim.htm but it is a bit too visual for me (you have to drag and drop the rotors yourself, etc), it doesn't decode and it is for windows.

    I'm more interrested in an open source command line tool, with decoding abilities.

    --
    EULA : By reading the above message, you agree that I now own your soul.
  20. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Really?

    Japan's seizure of Manchuria and invasion of China wasn't a provocation? The rape of Nanking? 22 million Chinese civilans killed vs 960,000 Japanese civilians dead makes the allies the villains?

    How about the Jews and Gypsies killed by Germany, that's surely the fault of the allies.

  21. NSFW by TapeCutter · · Score: 0

    Link is self portrait of slashpotter.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  22. Connections - Faith in Numbers by peterofoz · · Score: 4, Informative
    Anyone who is serious about computing should watch this Connections episode by James Burke that takes you from the water wheel and jacquard loom to modern day computing. Its simply amazing.

    Connections - Episode 4 - "Faith in Numbers"

    1. Re:Connections - Faith in Numbers by Anrego · · Score: 1

      The Connections series is indeed timeless! They need to start making documentaries like that again... with real scientists/historians and not actors reading lines... and the assumption that the audience has an IQ of at least room temperature. Also the production values of that series are still impressive by today's standards. It blows my mind how they seem to have constructed entire elaborate sets with lots of extras and costume, just for these 10 second clips between segments. Just James Burke talking in front of a podium would be enough, but the high quality of the show makes it extra watchable.

      Would also recommend "The Machine That Changed the World" as worth checking out! The first 3 parts make a fairly comprehensive overview of the history of computing.

    2. Re:Connections - Faith in Numbers by robmclarty · · Score: 1

      Best comment I've seen all month. lol

    3. Re:Connections - Faith in Numbers by hedronist · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Connections (the original, not Connections II) and a few of others (The Ascent of Man by Jacob Branowski) set the bar for what really educational TV should be like.

    4. Re:Connections - Faith in Numbers by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that; I had not thought about the possibility of Connections being on YouTube (silly me). These things are still surprisingly enthralling . . .

    5. Re:Connections - Faith in Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ahh... Back when The Learning Channel was actually about learning...

      The most fun part (until you've seen an episode already) was trying to guess where it would go next when the next connection was coming in a series. In a way it was like trying to play along with Jeopardy, but in a historical timeline/storyline form. It was also neat when they'd do the jump-back sections with seemingly unrelated stuff in order to do the A+B=C things that they'd occasionally throw in.

      I do kind of miss shows like that. They were fun.

    6. Re:Connections - Faith in Numbers by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 2

      I have no idea why this comment was modded down. I,too, enjoyed TLC before it became the "Paint Your House" channel. James Burke will always be a on a pedestal for me. He had other series and books besides "Connections". Pick up a copy of the "Pinball Effect" and you'll be mesmerized for hours reading and re-reading his prose.

      There's still hope for good programming. Unfortunately, it's not coming from network or cable tv. I've setting IPTV. TWIT.TV and Revision3 are highly bookmarked on my system.

      Now, how do we convince someone to put Connections on the air again? Those Youtube versions are pretty grainy...

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    7. Re:Connections - Faith in Numbers by cavebison · · Score: 1

      I love those old 80's docos and their huge lapels!
      Much better quality than what passes for a lot of docos these days.

  23. Re:First post! by creat3d · · Score: 1

    It's not just anime when it involves child porn and mutilated corpses in between a thousand memes that most sane people can't fucking stand anymore.

    --
    Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
  24. Re:First post! by CTU · · Score: 0

    I don't judge anybody, but you have to admit some of them go way to far and can be scary.

  25. "computer wannabe" by doti · · Score: 2

    who the hell wants to be a computer?

    --
    factor 966971: 966971
    1. Re:"computer wannabe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kraftwerk

    2. Re:"computer wannabe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whether they wanted to be or not, plenty of men and women were computers during WWII. The machines of the war helped to change the meaning of the word from "A person who makes calculations or computations" to today's exclusive meaning as an electronic computing device.

    3. Re:"computer wannabe" by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      Wow, we really have come full circle now. link

    4. Re:"computer wannabe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep

    5. Re:"computer wannabe" by calzakk · · Score: 1

      No; they sure loved their computers, but they didn't want to be them. That was Ultravox.

  26. Re:First post! by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 0

    Deal with it.

  27. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

    Sure is a good thing those nice Germans didn't target any civilians.

    Oh, wait, we're back in the real world here! The sad part is, I'm not even entirely sure you're trolling. The Americans didn't have entirely clean hands in the whole affair. Very few countries have fought a major war without doing some things they've later come to regret, one good reason not to have the damn things. And the internment camps were a travesty, but they pale beside Auschwitz or Birkenau. The majority of Japanese-Americans who were put into internment camps did, at least, come out of them alive, and weren't sent there with the deliberate purpose of mass slaughter.

    That doesn't by any means make it right. But it's nothing like the Holocaust.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  28. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Trailwalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At no point in history has the United States of America run a concentration camp. EVER.

    We called them "Reservations".

  29. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 0

    Except that reservation don't have walls or fences nor does the US have internal passports (like the Soviet Union did) restricting travel out of the reservations.

    Reservations have their own tribal law for everything from traffic to misdemeanors while Federal Law deals with Felonies.

  30. 1st posessed frankenputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The unfortunate inclusion of decoding algorithms taken from John Dee's manuscripts - possibly with apocryphal additions by Edward Kelly - cause ... "malfunctions" which continue to plague classically named supercomputers up to the present day. We need only to remember what happened to the movie COLOSSUS computer, the HECTOR, The PROTEUS ... not to mention others. ;)

  31. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by artor3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the case now, but back when the reservations were set up, they were absolutely analogous to concentration camps. Entire civilizations were rounded up and sent on a death march to tiny parcels of low-value land, resulting in obscene high mortality rates. If it were done today, it would rightfully be called ethnic cleansing.

    I'm not at all the sort to hate on America -- modern day Americans are in no way responsible for the actions of people living close to two centuries ago. Heck, while I don't know the statistics, I'd be willing to bet that the majority of Americans aren't even descended from the English settlers who were living here back then. But we do need to acknowledge that what was done was wrong.

  32. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how you weeabos call it "anime" instead of what it really is, a cartoon. It's like you're trying to disguise the fact that you watch shit that's made for kids.

  33. GOATSE : Do not open link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GOATSE : Do not open link

  34. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I care about WW2 is that the Germans gassed/baked a bunch of Jews, the Russians crushed the Germans, the Japanese proved they were dishonorable cowards and the USA nuked the shit out of Japan for it. Anything else is irrelevant.

  35. Colossus was not used for Enigma by ivaradi · · Score: 2

    While Colossus may have been capable of breaking Enigma (though it is not sure, as it was a highly specialized computer), it was actually used for breaking another, more sophisticated cipher produced by a Lorenz-made machine connected to a telex machine. When encoding, the telex machine emitted a 5-bit code, which was encrypted using the Lorenz machine. For decoding the process was reversed. This type of traffic was called Fish or Tunny in Bletchley Park.

    1. Re:Colossus was not used for Enigma by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      It is slightly embarrassing (especially in light of all the "Don't nerds know this already?" traffic upthread) that yours is the first comment I've seen to mention this.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    2. Re:Colossus was not used for Enigma by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Would this have been possible? My understanding was that Colossus was essentially a solid state Lorenz with some statistical analysis electronics.

    3. Re:Colossus was not used for Enigma by ivaradi · · Score: 1

      Yes, the wheels of the Lorenz machine were simulated by some logical circuits made of vacuum tubes. But the book I read on the subject claimed, that the circuits were quite generic (some registers and logical operations), so if wired differently, one could make the computer to perform other combinations of operations. Of course breaking Enigma is quite a complicated matter, so it is entirely possible that Colossus was not flexible enough to be wired to do that.

    4. Re:Colossus was not used for Enigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding was that Colossus was essentially a solid state Lorenz with some statistical analysis electronics.

      Certainly not solid state, since transistors were not invented until after the war.

    5. Re:Colossus was not used for Enigma by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. Seems I misunderstood the meaning of "solid state".

  36. Article omits relevant information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amazingly the article omits to tell us about Konrad Zuze:

    "Konrad Zuse (German pronunciation: [knat tsuz]; 22 June 1910 Berlin – 18 December 1995 Hünfeld near Fulda) was a German engineer and computer pioneer. His greatest achievement was the world's first functional program-controlled Turing-complete computer, the Z3, which became operational in May 1941. He received the Werner-von-Siemens-Ring in 1964 for the Z3.[1] Much of his early work was financed by his family and commerce, but after 1939 he was given resources by the Nazi German Government.[2]
    Zuse's S2 computing machine is considered to be the first process-controlled computer. In 1946, he designed the first high-level programming language, Plankalkül.[3] Zuse founded one of the earliest computer businesses on 1 April 1941 (Zuse Ingenieurbüro und Apparatebau).[4] This company built the Z4, which became the world's first commercial computer."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konrad_Zuse

    1. Re:Article omits relevant information by DarkDust · · Score: 1

      I also find it totally amazing that Konrad Zuse's Z3 is always and consistently omitted by americans when it comes to determine which one was the first real computer. My guess is most of them simply don't know about the Zuse and the Z3. It's quite sad, because the achievements of this man are astounding.

    2. Re:Article omits relevant information by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      It is an amazing device, but I think the reason it's omitted is that it didn't have a conditional branch, so although theoretically Turing-complete, it was in practice impossible to program and use in the same way as a modern computing device; i.e. it was effectively a very clever calculator. Later machines, e.g. ENIAC, were programable in the modern sense, even though initially using plugboards. I had always thought that Colossus wasn't a true programable computer, but having browsed around a few descriptions, it seems that it was, so it is fair to give it credit as the first modern computer.

  37. Re:The 4004!!! by Lanteran · · Score: 1

    'cause the same guy's been posting those links for a few days at least.

    --
    "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  38. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    There was one "death march", the Trail of Tears, that only affects the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee-Creek, and Seminole.

    The only other forced relocations in the history of the United States were General Order No. 11 (1863), the Japanese, German and Italian internments in World War Two and removal of the Aleutian Islanders in World War Two.

    It wasn't just "English settlers" who were living back then, English, German, Dutch, Scottish and Irish.

    My European ancestors got here in 1631 and 1895, my American Indian ancestors got here, oh about 10-45,000 years ago.

    I'm from an Indian Reservation, studied the American Indian Wars in grad school and nothing I've experienced or learned tells me that anything the Americans did to the American Indians was any worse than what the American Indians had done to each other for thousands of years.

  39. Re:First post! by Securityemo · · Score: 1

    How can something that's just ink, colour and imagination "go way too far"? It's not like anyone's forcing people to see it. Not that I watch a lot of anime, but still.

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
  40. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by arth1 · · Score: 1

    He's also right about the US de facto starting the war against Japan. Prior to Pearl Harbor, the US had given Japan an ultimatum which was technically impossible to comply with. Basically, it demanded full and immediate withdrawal of all Japanese forces from Indochina by the end of the year, which was clearly logistically impossible (how long as the US taken to withdraw from Iraq now?). The Japanese interpreted this as war being impossible to avoid, and attacked Perl Harbor on December 7th, 1941, where the US really was building a war machine for attacking Japan. So they weren't wrong about that.

    This seems to be a reoccurring tactic by the United States - a similarly impossible ultimatum was given to Saddam Hussein, where it was demanded that he prove that he didn't have weapons of mass destruction, and proving a large scale negative is, of course, quite impossible.

    One can only speculate in why the US uses this tactic - it certainly won't fool the people the ultimatum is given to, nor historians. My personal speculation is that it's meant to fool the US population, in order to gain popular support, and may even be fairly successful at that.

    Anyhow, it's at this point just an interesting historical footnote. The war happened, and US trickery doesn't in any way detract from the war crimes done by the adversaries, nor exonerate their actions.

  41. Colossus was Not for Enigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colossus was not developed to decrypt Enigma traffic; it was developed to assist in decryption of a much more complex German cipher called "Tunny" by the Brits.

  42. Often overlooked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A german engineer started out in computer-technology way before that and without any military-driven background. Konrad Zuse was a pioneer. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konrad_Zuse)

  43. Z Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the german Z series computers? They were the first working example ...

  44. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Most of the time I love the crazy shit on the Internet, but the ignorance in this thread is appalling, even by Internet standards.

  45. Funny how none of these computers were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... invented by AFRICANS, isn't it...

  46. It goes waaaaaay further back than this... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    There is evidence that some of the first computers ever produced existed as far back as 150 BC, A device found in 1901, called the Antikythera mechanism, is a mechanical computing device believed to have been used to chart astronomical positions. It's overall design rivals the complexity of an early mechanical watch.

    Another fun item, the japanese Karakuri ningy, or clockwork doll. They are some of the earliest known examples of robotics, going back to the 17th century. The Karakuri ningy was primarily used by wealthy dignitaries for ceremonial purposes, like serving tea. One of these clockwork doll would be placed upon a table, holding up a small tray. When a weighted object, such as a tea cup, was placed on the tray, the weight of the object would set the mechanics in motion, causing the doll to turn 180 degrees from the server and would then begin walking toward the guest at the other side of the table, to deliver the tea. Once the weight was removed from the tray, the action stopped and the mechanism would reset itself for the next use... allowing both server and guest to repeatedly serve each other as a form of entertainment.

    Although much of this has been replaced by electronic devices, such as the Sony Aibo and the Honda Asimo, the old style Karakuri ningy design is still in use today, but mostly as large scale devices in factory settings as carts for moving large, heavily-weighted objects, like car engines to different parts of an assembly line, as a cheap way to conserve power by using an object's own weight to move it.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:It goes waaaaaay further back than this... by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      japanese Karakuri ningy, or clockwork doll.

      It's "ningyo" not "ningy".

  47. This article is typical mass-media slop by Rich+Rostrom · · Score: 2

    A few bits of truth floating in a frothing stew of errors.

    As noted elsewhere, COLOSSUS was not used to break Enigma; it was designed to break the cipher of the Lorenz machine (Geheimschreiber). If the Allies had needed COLOSSUS to break Enigma, the war would have been much longer and bloodier. COLOSSUS was not even operational until February 1944. The Allies had re-broken Enigma in early 1940, by hand methods. They read the main Luftwaffe key (RED) from then until the end of the war. They read the main navy key (HYDRA) from mid-1941 on. In 1942, the Germans adopted a special high-quality key for U-boats only (TRITON) which was not broken for 10 months (during which the Battle of the Atlantic was nearly lost). TRITON was finally broken by Turing himself.

    Use of the Enigma machine did not "spread through the German military". Enigma was adopted as the standard cipher machine for all branches of the German armed forces by 1929.

    The "Turing Machine" was not "one of the earliest modern computers", it is a theoretical model of a computing device.

    The Germans did not "[strengthen] their system by changing the cipher every day.” They had more than one "cipher" - more precisely, each branch or sub-branch of service had its own daily settings for the Enigma (its "key"). There were about 50 Enigma keys in use by the end of the war.

    ULTRA was the code term for any intelligence from decrypted enemy signals. Enigma signals were not decrypted with COLOSSUS - nor with the electromechanical "bombes" used to crack Enigma. The function of the bombes was to find the settings for a key. The key-finding process tested settings against a "crib": ciphertext for which the cleartext was known or guessable. The testing went on until a setting produced the expected cleartext. Then all messages on that key could be decoded using a copy of the Enigma.

    The article is a muddled retelling of stuff that has been known for many years. As others have written, it's not fit for SlashDot.

    1. Re:This article is typical mass-media slop by fnj · · Score: 1

      Just to elaborate a little on your excellent summary, it wasn't the Allies who broke the Enigma ciphers, and it wasn't in 1940. The Polish Cipher bureau first did it in 1932. Then in 1939 they provided techniques and equipment (actual working reverse engineered Enigma machines, the reverse engineering being helped by theft of secrets) to French and British intelligence. Without that singular act, the war would have been longer, and gone worse for the Allies. And it certainly would have been longer and gone worse, had the British intelligence service and scientific resources been unequal to the herculean task of further evolving the techniques and equipment, and sustaining a decryption effort so demanding that the Germans dismissed it as impossible.

      In practice, as you point out, there was not a single "breaking," after which the deed was done and only the crank had to be turned every day. It was a battle to the end to discover new keys as the keys changed constantly, and this battle was mainly done by British intelligence. It was won using enormous intellect, ingenious mechanical machines (the Bombes), and prodigious effort constantly throughout the war. The U.S. contributed some manufacturing capacity but not all that much else to this particular effort.

      The Enigma machine itself, particularly the fully evolved Naval version, had the capability to have stymied even the British decryption efforts, but the overconfident and careless German operators sabotaged 99.9...% of the protection of their own Enigma technology due to naive shortcuts in its use.

      At the peak of the operation, Enigma intercepts were being routinely deciphered by the British within hours. The routine was not in the sense of turning the crank, however; it was due to the sustained tireless efforts from top to bottom of a sizeable staff, involving intense dedication, amazing cleverness in developing and applying methods of human ingenuity and insight to the problem. Even with the important assistance of the Bombes, it required vast backbreakingly repetitive intellectual labor to break each intercept.

      Hopefully I have done some slight justice to this most amazing feat without getting too many of the particulars misrepresented. The Enigma machine itself was jaw-droppingly clever for its time, but this was dwarfed by the genius of men like Alan Turing and the almost incomprehensible dedication of a small army of workers, including many women.

      For his priceless efforts, Turing was driven to suicide at age 41, nine years after WW II. In 2009, Prime Minister Gordon Brown publically apologized on behalf of the British government for the way Turing was treated after the war.

  48. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by WillKemp · · Score: 2

    We called them "Reservations".

    In Australia, the concentration camps were called "missions" - and run by christian missionaries.

  49. Beginning of the computer age? by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    It's strange that an article with that headline says nothing about the postwar period. So here's what's missing.

    In the UK, Colossus was kept secret after the war. But the knowledge gained in its construction was used to develop the first British postwar computers (the Manchester Baby, an experimental design, leading to the Ferranti Mk.1 commercial computer). Alan Turing and others who were involved with Colossus worked on the Manchester series.

    In the US, ENIAC was commissioned by the Army for ballistics calculations.
    As far as I can find on short notice, the Americans didn't use computers in their WW2 codebreaking efforts.

    1. Re:Beginning of the computer age? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The US did truly amazing things with the codes used by Japan ~ around/before Pearl harbor. Let It Happen to cover the progress made and bring the US into the war... ?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konrad_Zuse is also very interesting in pre/war war Germany and post war Switzerland.
      But who wants to read about the first functional program-controlled Turing-complete computer (1941)?
      Best to stick to Colossus, bombe, Enigma ect :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  50. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suck a dick, little faggot

  51. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Whenever this debate kicks off both sides start listing things the other did wrong, but there are two important points that are usually overlooked.

    1. All parties did regrettable things. Internment/POW camps, bombing civilian targets with incendiaries and nukes, maltreatment and disregard for human rights and the Geneva Convention, sending soldiers on suicide missions... You can argue that one side was worse than the other, which is certainly true, but the real question is did the situation at the time justify those actions?

    2. At the time most people in Germany were not aware of the holocaust, most Japanese were not aware of the abuse going on in China, most Americans were not aware of the atomic bombings or the nature of life in internment camps. Accusing ordinary citizens of being guilty of supporting those actions is unfair. In fact it is the justification used by the 7/7 London bombers, which to my mind made little sense because most people were against the wars they were accused of supporting. 2 million of us even marched against them... But anyway, the situations that lead to these things are complicated and they were usually kept secret until after they had happened.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  52. Other precursor by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Another precursor of computer development is Konrad Zuse and his work on his Z serie of machine (a series of binary floating point computer with increasing programability, reaching peak with the Z3 being Turing complete).

    It's interesting because unlike all the precursors mentioned in TFA, it was not some secret monster developed by intelligence services to crack codes, but a publicly available project with practical industrial applications (to ease the massive calculation in some engineering fields).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  53. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sadly, while the poster is clearly trolling with his deliberately lopsided history, the US did put well over 100,000 Japanese Americans into internment camps. These camps, while offering better conditions in most respects, bore far too close a resemblance to concentration camps for anyone with a conscience. look it up is you need to know more.

    Have you ever heard of the German American Bund? It was one of several organizations of German Americans in the 1930s-40s. It was a significant pro-Nazi force in the United States. If you watch this video, you will think your eyes are tricking you. But yes, that is the United States, and yes, the giant figure you can see in the back of some of the stages is George Washington. Was the Bund potentially dangerous? How could the government not believe it was a possibility? There were a large number of reports of "Fifth Columnists , such as the Sudetendeutsches Freikorps in Czechoslovakia, and the Selbstschutz in Poland that aided the German invaders. There were similar reports out of Norway, Denmark, and other places.

    This is Time magazines description of how things looked in 1940 as the US watched country after country fall to Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, and Fascist Italy and be brutalized in a terrible fashion.

    WAR & PEACE: Science of Treason - Monday, Aug. 26, 1940
    > The German-American Bund,* with 71 units strategically located in industrial centres or near munitions works, with 25,000 drilled and disciplined members, is only the most widely publicized of Hitler's U. S. supporters. There are in addition 10,000 other Hitler-heiling Germans in the U. S.; 400,000 Germans who support Hitler but keep quiet about it. There are lecturers, writers, organizers, technical experts, economists, historians. A German professor of history at the University of Hawaii has contributed articles on the U. S. Navy to the Nazi magazine Zeitschrift für Geopolitik, to which professors of the University of California and of Miami University in Ohio also contributed.

    > There are some 200,000 Italian fascists in the U. S.

    > Not counting fellow travelers, there are 100,000 U. S. Communists who are now actively collaborating with Nazis and Italian fascists, and who are more strategically placed than either in U. S. industry and trade unions. **

    > With native-born fascists included, the fifth column numbers more than a million. The main task of cleaning it out is a job for the FBI; laymen can take little direct action beyond reporting suspicious behavior to the Government. But every citizen can contribute to a change in the national atmosphere—"not of lethargy, not of fear, not of defeat, but invigorated by the defiant faith which we have known in the past as typically American."

    I've heard a report that 60,000 Germans & German Americans were arrested, and apparently at least 10,000 were held in camps. There may have been more. This story doesn't seem to get much attention, and the documents seem to be harder to come by.

    As to the Japanese, there were many of them that, like the Germans, also had patriotic organizations tying them to Japan.

    From: Bainbridge Island Japanese American Memorial Ignores Wartime Realities

    Before the war many thousands of Japanese Americans and Japanese citizens living in the U.S. belonged to militant and patriotic organizations such as the Imperial Comradeship Society and the Japanese Military

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  54. unfortunately it's completely wrong by decora · · Score: 2

    the real 'pioneers of computers' were the Census machines, and the vast bureaucracies like the Social Security Administration.

    and yes, even the machines in the Nazi concentration camps, which IBM Germany worked on.

    dare i mention that the Soviet Union was a huge punch card customer through the 1930s?

    and that punch card machines are, well, basically, like gigantic electromechanical SQL devices?

    oh, and the Japanese fascists were pretty good customers too.

    ahhh

    but of course, lets forget about all that. everyone knows the first computers were codebreakers built to help stop hitler. yay us.

    1. Re:unfortunately it's completely wrong by Conare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For punch card machines you can go all the way back to the Jaquard Loom in 1801 which used punch cards to set weave patterns. Again, probably 95% of you readers knew this, but no one else had mentioned it yet so...

      --
      Stop Continental Drift! Reunite Gondwanaland!
    2. Re:unfortunately it's completely wrong by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I sometimes find myself wondering what some of the great minds/inventors/engineers of the past could have done with the technology we now have.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  55. Tommy Flowers by JacksonG · · Score: 1

    Sadly yet another article that talks about collossus and seems to give all the credit to Alan Turing without mentioning the contribution of Tommy Flowers :(

    --
    I am not a Frog. I am a Free Womble!
    1. Re:Tommy Flowers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly yet another article that talks about collossus and seems to give all the credit to Alan Turing without mentioning the contribution of Tommy Flowers :(

      Yeh- If Tommy Flowers had not put his hand in his pocket and paid for some of the Colossus development himself it might never have been built.

  56. Nah ny toilet was first computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 9 of them in a row. I read result in Hex. It had error detection!!! VEry advanced. 9th bit.

  57. COLOSSUS didn't decrypt Enigma by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 2

    It was designed to break the next German threat: encrypted radio teleprinter traffic...the Germans' version of SIGABA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_computer

  58. Dodgy Math by KeithIrwin · · Score: 1

    The Enigma may have had 150,000,000,000,000,000,000 encodings which were theoretically possible before it was built, but, the actual real Enigma machines had quite a bit less. They had 3 rotors each with 26 positions and those three rotors were chosen (with some specific order) from a larger set of at most 7 (differing numbers depending on when in the war we're talking about and which branch of the German military). In addition, they used up to 2 patch cables. This gives a total number of possible encodings for a real Enigma machine of 26*26*26 (rotor postions) * 7*6*5 (rotor selection) * 26*25/2 (first patch) * 24*23/2 (second patch) / 2 (adjustment for the patch cables being interchangeable in the order) = 165,539,556,000 actual possible encodings at best (and less than that through most of the war due to smaller numbers of rotors being used). This is a lot, but, for example, not so many that you can't carry out a brute-force attack, which is exactly what the allies did. The bigger number from the article is only sensible so long as the rotor layout remains secret, which it didn't as some of the machines fell into allied hands.

    In short, it's confusing the design space (possible choices at design time) with the key (parts which can be changed while in use). It's like calculating the number of encodings for DES by assuming that any S-Boxes could be chosen. The Enigma machine was a particular machine, not the set of all possible similar rotor machines which could have been manufactured.

    1. Re:Dodgy Math by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      They used more than 2 patch cables. 10 cables were supplied with the machine, and as of 1939, 7-10 cables were used. See e.g. here, which arrives at 10^23 practically possible encodings.

    2. Re:Dodgy Math by Webcommando · · Score: 1

      I don't know if the math is dodgy but I do know the use of the Enigma was also a good example of how poor use of the device can lesson the effectiveness.

      Many of the messages sent between stations using the Enigma had similar sets of characters. For example, messages would end with praise to the fuhrer or start with something related to weather (that's two I can recall). This gave the allies a chance to have a known set of plain text and would greatly limit the problem space.

      I actually wrote an Enigma simulator for the iPhone because it is a fascinating device (e.g.. being a symmetric code/decode machine). It is a little dated and might not work on modern iPhone OS's but I did it as a labor of love and how cool the machine was.

      There is a great little tool to teach students about the Enigma machine as part of a WWII curriculum call the Paper Enigma.

      --
      I love the sound of distortion in the morning -- webcommando
  59. Re:The 4004!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF you fucking asshole.

  60. Antikythera was not a computer by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    It is actually a lot more complicated than a watch, though. It is an analogue time representation machine relying on planetary gear systems. It is also completely deterministic, i.e. it can be wound backwards as well as forwards, so it is in no sense a computer.

    However, its existence asks a big question - did the Roman Empire hold technical progress up for nearly 1500 years? It seems likely that it was the Roman takeover of the Hellenic world that put paid to the skills and thought needed to produce things like this. The maker(s) of the Antikythera mechanism were as skilled as Galileo, and about as capable astronomically. The Romans were militarily effective, but otherwise uncivilised, like the Normans.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Antikythera was not a computer by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      The Roman empire did *not* hold progress up by 1500 years. The *collapse* of the Roman empire held it up by 1500 years.

      A *lot* of technological advance happened under the Romans, and perhaps some of the most obvious examples of it are their feats of construction and architecture. (both of which are practical applications of their advances in mathematics, physics, and chemistry). It's quite telling that aqueducts that they built 2000 years ago are still standing while some buildings less than 100 years old are falling apart, or that the Colosseum would not have been possible to rebuild until the early 20th Century because our understanding of architecture and construction methods took that long to catch up with what the Romans were doing.

      We are, today, still using technologies that were invented by the Romans, stuff that you probably take for granted without ever thinking about where it came from... stuff like indoor plumbing, central heating/cooling, glass, and steel.

  61. And Max Newman, and Bill Tutte by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    ...and a whole lot of others. Turing would the last person to approve - he was notably modest about his own contributions. Flowers' contribution was that of a technology enabler - he identified ways that thermionic valves (tubes) could be made reliable (the main one being not switching the heaters on and off.) This was a very important contribution - but without Tutte, Turing and Newman there would have been nothing to contribute to.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  62. The full story will never be known . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The father-in-law of a close friend of mine worked as a technician for the Post Office in England in 1939. Late that year he was transferred to an unnamed organization at an undisclosed location, and for the next six years left home each morning and returned each evening. He had strict instructions to never say anything about his work to anyone. In 1946 he returned to his prewar job with the Post Office, and worked there until he retired in 1965. On his last day at the Post Office an unidentified man showed up and presented him with a gold watch, saying it was "for services to the Nation". He died about seven years later without ever telling anyone in his family anything about his wartime work.

  63. Re:Allies were the villians in WWII by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


    too close a resemblance to concentration camps

    Nonsense. Show me the ovens for the cremation of murdered humans and you might have a point. Indeed, I believe the Japanese detainees were regularly fed.

    The Japanese internment camps were a gross abuse of power for suspect personal gain, a travesty of civil rights for US citizens, and of very questionable strategic gain. But to give them the moral equivalence of the Nazi-run concentration camps is historical revisionist bs.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  64. Turing Machine by wbean · · Score: 1

    From the article: "Work on the bombe was handed to Alan Turing, who was developing a concept of a computing device, the Turing Machine, capable of performing rapid calculations. " Don't you just love technical writing in the media?

  65. industrial control history by decora · · Score: 1

    very interesting... i wonder what other old machines used punch cards?

    the player piano surely can't have been the only thing between the jacquard loom and the Census machine in the 1890s.

  66. And what about Conrad Zuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what about Conrad Zuse?
    He invented what we would call a computer before all the others...

  67. The Full Story... by ddelmonte · · Score: 1

    Probably will never be known. I have - on and off - over time, been cobbling together bits and pieces (some experience, some plagiarism and some wit) to try to make a storyline - hopefully one that kids will find engaging. You can find it here... (http://eclecticplanet.org). I welcome constructive criticism, and some good humours. David DelMonte

    1. Re:The Full Story... by ddelmonte · · Score: 2

      Probably will never be known. I have - on and off - over time, been cobbling together bits and pieces (some experience, some plagiarism and some wit) to try to make a storyline - hopefully one that kids will find engaging. You can find it here... (http://eclecticplanet.org). I welcome constructive criticism, and some good humours. David DelMonte

      it would have been more helpful if I gave the exact link... http://eclecticplanet.org/tech/computer/

  68. Re:First post! by Stone2065 · · Score: 1

    Actually, cartoons ARE made for kids, i.e. those under 18 (hell, under 12, let's be real here), however, Anime CAN be oriented towards a more mature audiance. No, I dont' mean porn, just more mature. Porn cartoons are Mangas. :)

    --
    Stone
  69. How to Recover files from external hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    External hard drives are very useful piece of equipment and due to advantages like portability and operation on plug and play basis it is the first choice to backup and store important data. people are used to store their photos, video and other data on the external hard drive. Then external hard drive certainly brings much convenience in our daily life.

    However, a survey from applexsoft data recovery company shows that the external hard drive takes the largest portion in the storage media from which people often lose their data. That is, the way to restore data from external hard drive is much needed indeed. Certainly, a handy external hard drive recovery tool, like AppleXsoft File Recovery, will be highly recommended to help retrieve data from external drive. Data on external drive will be lost due to various causes like accidentally deleted file, missing/lost partition, deleted Partition, re-formatting the drive and formatting the partition. If you do lose your data, it may not be gone forever. Retrieving data from external hard drive is easy. No matter the files on external hard drive are deleted, formatted or lost.

    If you have lost data from your external hard drive follow these precautionary measures to recover your data successfully:
    1. Stop using the external hard drive till you recover deleted data from it. If you write new data onto the external hard drive, the new data may overwrite the old data, then you can' t recover it.
    2. Connect external hard drive onto another computer as a slave.
    3. Install A Data Recovery Software to this another computer, which is healthy system and has the best of hardware components, and then proceed ahead recovering the data.
    4. Scan the drive and evaluate the recovery results obtained with the trial version.
    5. Save the recovered data to the healthy drive.

    Applexsoft File Recovery for Mac is this kind of external hard drive software to recover files lost due to accidental deleting, formatting, virus infection, improper operation, unexpected power failure, and other unknown reasons. It can recover data from lost, deleted, logical corrupted and formatted external hard drive. Versatile preview lets you enjoy external hard drive in advance.

    http://www.applexsoft.com/howto/recover-files-from-external-hard-drive.html

  70. Get Married at Bletchly Park by cancerIFA · · Score: 1

    Can thoroughly recommend a visit to http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/ which also houses The National Museum of Computing http://www.tnmoc.org/ Of the codes generated by the 12 different ENIGMA-type machines used by the Germans, 2 were never broken. And finally, the museum is used as an intreresting location for corporate events and weddings.