Slashdot Mirror


Physical Pain and Emotional Pain Use Same Brain Networks

Antipater writes "To the brain, heartbreak and emotional torment are no different from having hot coffee spilled on your hand, reports CNN. They cite a recent study from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in which 40 recently-dumped men and women underwent fMRI scans while having their arm burned or being shown a picture of their ex. The stimuli produced nearly identical brain reactions."

154 comments

  1. In other news... by artor3 · · Score: 1

    ...scientists found to be dreaming up bizarre study purely to satisfy their own schadenfreude.

    1. Re:In other news... by petteyg359 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of inspiration can be found in seemingly bizarre experiments.

    2. Re:In other news... by SomeJoel · · Score: 3, Funny

      A lot of inspiration can be found in seemingly bizarre experiments.

      For instance, with the properly constructed experiment, we could finally figure out "How many marketing people does it take to change a lightbulb?"

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A lot of inspiration can be found in seemingly bizarre experiments.

      For instance, with the properly constructed experiment, we could finally figure out "How many marketing people does it take to change a lightbulb?"

      While standing barefoot in a puddle of salt water....

      And another experiment where we have bleeding Wall Street lawyers in a pool of sharks to see if there really is professional courtesy between the two.

      And I for one truly believe, as God is my witness, that Congressmen can fly by flapping their arms if they are released from a high enough altitude,

    4. Re:In other news... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      It's a joke. If the mental image of a bunch of dudes in white coats with clipboards sticking a guy in a big humming machine, and proceeding to burn his arm with a hot iron doesn't amuse (or terrify) you, then you are officially a zombie.

    5. Re:In other news... by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      It's a joke. If the mental image of a bunch of dudes in white coats with clipboards sticking a guy in a big humming machine, and proceeding to burn his arm with a hot iron doesn't amuse (or terrify) you, then you are officially a zombie.

      You should see how they inflicted the emotional pain!

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    6. Re:In other news... by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      You should see how they inflicted the emotional pain!

      "Yes, miss, we understand. Yes, he has been a loving, honest, and decent boyfriend. He has treated you with respect, and he has been there for you in some difficult times, like when your dog died. He brought you chocolates and flowers on Valentine's day and he even cooked you dinner. He tolerates your mother and your father thinks he's a stand-up guy. But you see, you still have to dump him. You have to dump him for science."

    7. Re:In other news... by grouchomarxist · · Score: 2

      "Of course, after this experiment is finished. I have another experiment for you. In my pants."

    8. Re:In other news... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I don't find this story bizarre, quite the opposite in fact. I think this research might be able to shed light on some; as-yet poorly understood, sources of pain, such as Fibromyalgia. Right now, the only real treatment for Fibromyalgia is an anti-depressant called Cymbalta. In the words of my doctor "for a large minority of cases, this drug helps, but we don't know how or why" (for the record, I am among those for whom it is not very effective unfortunately)

      In my opinion, any ethically run study on the mechanisms of pain and how they might be linked or related to the mechanisms of depression are a Good Thing

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    9. Re:In other news... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      In addition to the medical utility, such work likely has a fair amount of basic research value. The brain is monstrously complex and we don't understand it all that well. The demonstration that one phenomenon is actually a slightly modified version, re-using much of the same tissue, as a quite different seeming one likely has interesting implications. We know in broad strokes that the brain is a giant pile of hacks and ad-hoc extensions of prior function; but that isn't nearly the same thing as knowing the exact shape of the tangled mess.

    10. Re:In other news... by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Not a drug, and there are no guarantees, but did you try Tai Chi Chuan? Last yeara small study found that it helps with some of the symptoms. My mother-in-law, who suffers from fibromyalgia, reports that since she has taken up Tai Chi the symptoms improved and, maybe even more importantly, she feels much better emotionally. As a Tai Chi Chuan practitioner of 14 years myself, I would say that regardless of any effects on fibromyalgia it is worth taking up TCC anyway for the many general benefits it brings. But from to my experience with the art and from the little I know about fibromyalgia I can very well imagine how it helps, as TCC is very much about regaining control over one's body (and mind), which includes stuff like learning how to relax muscles that are habitually tense.

      It can be taunting to find a good TCC teacher/school, and bad ones abound. You want someone who treats TCC as the martial art it is, not some kind of dance or gymnastics. If you email me I may be able to give you advice in this area, depending on where you live. Good luck in any case.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    11. Re:In other news... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      A lot of inspiration can be found in seemingly bizarre experiments.

      For instance, with the properly constructed experiment, we could finally figure out "How many marketing people does it take to change a lightbulb?"

      We started this experiment back in 1972, as of 8 am today, we have no results.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:In other news... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Just because you can't understand the perfectly reasonable basis and implications of a study like this doesn't make it "bizarre". It makes you anti-intellectual, or at least it does when you dismiss it out of your own ignorance and lack of imagination.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:In other news... by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      As a psychology major, I am amused, but I also see the merit of this experiment.

    14. Re:In other news... by yomammamia · · Score: 1

      The neural activity monitored may not be related to the sensation of pain at all, but to the action of blocking or resolving it neurologically. The study is interesting but it only tracks blood flow. It is very imprecise and can only lead to guided guesswork.

      If the researchers are so confident in their determination of the role of those brain regions, perhaps they should lobotomise themselves in the same regions and never feel pain again.

    15. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a geneticist as well?

    16. Re:In other news... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the suggestion Knuckles, but I have tried Tai Chi, as well as Reikki and Shiatsu massage. About the only thing I haven't tried is medical marijuana. So far, the only noticable relief has been from Cymbalta combined with another anti-depressant and melatonin to make sure I get plenty of deep restful sleep. When I am physically active, even that isn't enough to prevent crippling and depressing flare-ups.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    17. Re:In other news... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. Nature has a habit of reusing "hardware" for multiple functions, especially in the brain.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    18. Re:In other news... by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Pity :( Of course I have no idea about your condition and the quality and duration of training you tried, so I trust that you had a reasonable teacher and gave it a chance for sufficient time. If you reconsider at any time, feel free to email me; I'll remember this conversation. Otherwise, you *should* give the marijuana a try I guess ...
      Good luck once more!

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    19. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe that Cymbalta is a real treatment for anything outside of the pharmaceutical industry's lust for money. And that is relevant to this study, because it sounds like the same kind of science - marketing science. George Bush wanted the citizenry to be examined for mental illnesses, and it is just phenomenal how today's science has found so many people mentally ill, as compared to years ago. There are so many new "diseases" and so many new treatments, for both normal human emotions and behaviors. Fibromyalgia is real, in my opinion, but the medical industry does not understand it in any scientific way outside of being able to use the patients as subjects in peddling new pharmaceutical inventions.

    20. Re:In other news... by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      I deal with Fibromyalgia as well (though mine is much tamer than that of anyone else I know) and so when these things come up I pay keen attention. I've seen elsewhere that certain drugs like dextromethorphan (found in cough syrup) can help by disrupting a different set of pain receptors than typical painkillers. Much more recently, I've been looking into "EFT" - a practice related to acupressure that assumes to relate physical and emotional pain.

      Regarding Cymbalta: a friend of mine had horrible reactions to this drug. She went from being in constant pain to simply being suicidal. I cringe when I hear its name.

  2. Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 2

    but the same brain you are talking about has a "would you rather" processor - and mine would rather suffer an emotional heartbreak than a boot to the head

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
    1. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by ustolemyname · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yet I, having suffered both, would rather the boot to the head.

      Different people value equivalent things differently. News at 11.

    2. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by barlevg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      agreed. pain from a boot to the head fades faster.

    3. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but the same brain you are talking about has a "would you rather" processor - and mine would rather suffer an emotional heartbreak than a boot to the head

      I have suffered tremendous psychological pain because of mental illness and I think I'd prefer physical pain... hell, one way of making your brain let go of mental anguish is to hurt yourself, cut, burn, whatever. Then you can focus on the throbbing pain of the cigarette burn, overriding the mental pain, and it is heaven compared to severe anxiety/panic.

    4. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      boot to the head, agreed. but kick in the balls, that's a whole different story...

    5. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Yet I, having suffered both, would rather the boot to the head.

      Amen to that. Thankfully I have only experienced a real broken heart once, and I suspect that many people are lucky enough to never have the full experience. The closest thing I can think of was having my father die, a tooth crack, and a broken pelvis all at the same time. But I'd rather take all that again over a heartache, cause that put me out of commission for months, and decades later, I'm still having flashbacks.

    6. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Parent is fucking nuts and deserves a boot to the head.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    7. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by petman · · Score: 1

      A boot to the head can kill you or leave you brain damaged. Not, always, but there's the possibility.

    8. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by definate · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This remind's me of something a teacher from primary school used to say...

      "Sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will always hurt me."
      - Penny Sinclaire

      I remember this profoundly affecting me at the time, because people had always stated the converse (that "names will never hurt me"), blew my mind at the time.

      It must have affected me so much, that to this day, I still remember it some 20+ years later.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    9. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is an effective remedy. I really don't care that it offends some women, it is far better then slowly killing yourself. what this guy ^^^ said.

    10. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Killer+Orca · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are having flashbacks decades later over some "broken heart"? Sorry, but you sound like a pussy who really needs to grow a sack. Women are simply holes for men to relieve themselves into, much like public toilets. Never forget this.

      Take heed gentlemen, this anonymous internet commenter has all the traits women desire but chooses to bestow his wisdom onto us.

    11. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2

      Still fades faster. A solid kick and, what, you feel sick, nauseous, just want to curl up and die?

      For how long? Five minutes?

      Yeah, a bad breakup can have at least those symptoms, but for weeks, at least.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    12. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by doug · · Score: 2

      Everybody deserves a boot to the head. Sometimes we know why, sometimes not.

    13. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Then you've never suffered a real heart ache. A real heartache is torture so painful that its effects can last for years, whereas a boot to the head merely hurts, and even surgery is just very painful for a few days. Nothing compared to a real heart break.

    14. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      So can a bad breakup

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    15. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest thing I can think of was having my father die, a tooth crack, and a broken pelvis all at the same time. But I'd rather take all that again over a heartache

      Wow. I could understand the other guy - he would rather be kicked in the head than, say, have his partner who he loves leave him. Got that. But you'd rather have your father die than that? I guess if he's already dead that makes it rather hypothetical but still, it seems a little cold. I'm sure I'd pick heartbreak over someone dying.

    16. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      The effects of Limerence can last for 2-3 years.

      It took me about two years before I stopped waking up every morning, crushed, upon realizing that I had been dreaming, and that we weren't together again, laughing and kissing.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    17. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by somersault · · Score: 2

      Heartbreak is worse than someone dying. I've had both heartbreak, and my father dying. I wasn't on the best of terms with my father when he died, but my brain worked it out and let it go because there is nothing that can be done. After a bad breakup with an ex, I still worked it out eventually, but it was much harder knowing that she was still out there. We eventually did start talking again too and worked out our own issues. Rather annoyingly, a lot of the stuff that she initially blamed me for, and I tried to accept was my fault, she now admits was her fault.. so I put myself through a lot of pain for nothing.. though I feel it has made me a better person, able to be truly self critical. Most people try and block it out when they are criticised, whereas I take it seriously.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by somersault · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who's either never lost anyone, or who doesn't love very deeply.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    19. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, staying with the twat ALSO can cause brain damage.

    20. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Had a colleague of mine that slammed his head good, he was on sick leave almost a year before he was back 100%, dizzy spells, light sensitivity and throbbing headaches... so I wouldn't underestimate the boot to the head.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    21. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      You should always live through the effects a bad breakup (unless you kill yourself or your partner does).

      Not so with a boot to the head.

      That solid kick to the head may cause lasting bodily damage - spinal injury, brain damage, death, etc.

      Don't underestimate a boot to the head - it could be the last thing you do.

    22. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by mldi · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who's either never lost anyone, or who doesn't love very deeply.

      Or they're just able to manage it more efficiently and not whine about it for 10 years.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    23. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by somersault · · Score: 1

      If they can get over it completely as quickly as a bruise on their head (couple of weeks), or even a crack in their skull (say 3 months), then it can't have been much of a "heartbreak". That's more of a "we went out for a couple of months and then one of us got bored".

      --
      which is totally what she said
    24. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was married for 10 years and found out I had a cheating spouse. Sure, it hurt. But I got over it pretty damn quickly. That long enough of a relationship for ya?

    25. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      True as well. Life's damn risky, isn't it :)

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    26. Re:Yeah - maybe if you look at it in a silo by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      That's why I was talking about a kick in the balls, not a boot to the head.

      But for the sake of argument, a boot to the head, depending how solid it is... It might kill me, but I also might be fine in a few minutes. A bad breakup is almost by definition going to hurt for awhile. It won't kill me (short of suicide), but there's also no chance that I'll be fine in ten minutes, or one day, or a week...

      If we're allowed to cheat, I'll take the boot to the head because I can probably avoid that a lot more easily than I can avoid a bad breakup. Boot to the head is easy -- step out of the way, or intercept boot. Then twist it and bring them down, twist again until they promise not to try to boot you in the head again.

      Breakups? There isn't a good way to avoid that. You could try not to fall in love in the first place, but that's not really up to you. You could try to never break up, but that's not really up to you, either, because now there are two people involved.

      I don't know why I'm doing this, though. The correct answer to "Would you rather have your heart broken or take a boot to the head?" is "No."

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  3. Bad scans by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Goes to show how crude our current scanning techniques are.

    I've burned my hand before and the sensation was quite different from being dumped.

    Not to say it's magic or not in the brain. Just saying fMRI isn't accurate enough to detect the difference. There most certainly is a difference.

    1. Re:Bad scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you're right. Your anecdotal evidence based on reconstructed memories surely disproves the data the scientists collected. You should win a nobel prize!

    2. Re:Bad scans by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Your anecdotal evidence based on reconstructed memories surely disproves the data the scientists collected.

      So your anecdotal evidence is that you've had a breakup that was the exact same experience as a dermal burn?

      Can anyone remember a breakup that was comparable subjectively to physically being burned?

    3. Re:Bad scans by cupantae · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know why parent is being modded up and the AC down. It's not like the researchers are saying to one another, "seeing as being dumped feels exactly like spilling hot coffee one the hand, we should check if this is backed by brain scans". You say that you know that the difference is, in fact, detectable between the two by adequate brain scanning equipment. You back this up by saying that the experiences feel different. That is as ridiculous as saying that you've rubbed charcoal and diamonds on paper, and you know they're different elements.

      --
      --
    4. Re:Bad scans by ATMAvatar · · Score: 2

      That may simply be due to a difference in intensity and duration. That says nothing about which part of the brain is going to handle each stimulus.

      The idea that emotional pain can manifest itself physically is hardly new, and this experiment reinforces that idea.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    5. Re:Bad scans by barlevg · · Score: 1

      I doubt the researchers are saying that physical and emotional pain are the exact same but rather that one's brain processes them in similar ways. So it suggests that it may be more than just poetic or overdramatic when one says, "It feels like my heart's been cut out" after a messy breakup.

    6. Re:Bad scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reads:"Nearly Identical" in the summary. So, they are different.

    7. Re:Bad scans by c0lo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Goes to show how crude our current scanning techniques are.

      That'n no true. What is however true is the /.-ers seldom read TFA.

      I've burned my hand before and the sensation was quite different from being dumped.

      Now, form the second FA:

      a network of brain regions that support the aversive quality of physical pain (the “affective” component), principally the dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) and anterior insula (AI), also underlie the feeling of social rejection. In contrast, the brain regions that support the somatic representation of physical pain, and are most closely aligned with the “sensory-discriminative” component—including the operculo-insular region [i.e., secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) and dorsal posterior insula (dpINS)]—are not activated by social rejection and do not factor into current theorizing about the neural overlap between social rejection and physical pain (1, 2).

      Translation: yes, the main areas activated in "affective pain" and "physical pain" are different.

      As plausible as this rationale is, here we suggest an alternative: that the neural overlap between social rejection and physical pain is more extensive than current findings suggest. Specifically, we propose that experiences of social rejection, when elicited powerfully enough, recruit brain regions involved in both the affective and sensory components of physical pain.

      Which, applied to your case, seems to indicate that your feeling of social rejection was not powerful enough. That... hints a bit about you or the strength of your relation, isn't it?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    8. Re:Bad scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *raises hand*

    9. Re:Bad scans by williamhb · · Score: 1

      I don't know why parent is being modded up and the AC down. It's not like the researchers are saying to one another, "seeing as being dumped feels exactly like spilling hot coffee one the hand, we should check if this is backed by brain scans". You say that you know that the difference is, in fact, detectable between the two by adequate brain scanning equipment. You back this up by saying that the experiences feel different. That is as ridiculous as saying that you've rubbed charcoal and diamonds on paper, and you know they're different elements.

      No, this raises an interesting question about another possible experiment, testing out philosophies of mind. Under materialism (as opposed to dualism) the experience is believed to be entirely contained within the brain (rather than an additional 'mind'). So, if the vast majority of subjects report the sensations as 'feeling' qualitatively different (that data hasn't been collected), then under materialism [good enough] scanning ought to be able to identify the difference. This suggests a possible experiment, though it wouldn't be conclusive as there are still significant get-out clauses in both directions: if it 'disproves' materialism then someone could claim the scanning equipment simply wasn't good enough or that the difference is not just in what areas are active but the nature of that activity; if it 'supports' materialism, someone could claim that the physical difference isn't the only difference.

    10. Re:Bad scans by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Yes. Both made me almost overdose on opiates.

      Next question.

    11. Re:Bad scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please tell me you aren't actually that stupid. I'm pretty sure that they didn't say anywhere it felt the same, just that it used the same brain networks. Durrr of course it doesn't feel the same, I'm sure they've also burned their hands and been dumped. You're not unique in your experience.

    12. Re:Bad scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like rubbing charcoal and diamonds on paper and finding different results, despite identical scans, then concluding that they are not identical in every way. He then hypotheses that current measurements are insufficient and that closer inspection might show how they are different.

      It's not perfect, but it's not as ridiculous as you suggest.

    13. Re:Bad scans by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      That is as ridiculous as saying that you've rubbed charcoal and diamonds on paper, and you know they're different elements.

      No this is a case of a very vague study with low precision. I'm not saying that the same regions of the brain don't light up... I'm saying even though they light up it doesn't mean the experiences are terribly similar.

      This study was the first to show that rejection can elicit a response in two brain areas associated with physical pain: the secondary somatosensory cortex and the dorsal posterior insula.

      With insufficient precision you can say "Both pain and rejection cause neural activity!" But that doesn't tell you much.

      A more apt analogy to this study would be the researchers taking glass and diamond and concluding they are carbon since they're both hard.

      I could tell you that both anger and arousal elicit an adreneline rush. That doesn't mean they are the same.

      For the sake of researching long term pain studies then yes I imagine the fact that both use inter-related circuitry is insightful and useful. But statements like "To the brain, heartbreak and emotional torment are no different from having hot coffee spilled on your hand" are terribly misleading.

    14. Re:Bad scans by statusbar · · Score: 2

      This is not really news; there was a different set of researchers last year who found that people taking painkillers like ibuprofin had less emotional hurt when a girlfriend dumped them.... So if you are expecting a messy breakup, take a bunch of ibuprofin as if you had a migrane.

      --jeffk++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    15. Re:Bad scans by Grygus · · Score: 1

      I see your reasoning but I think it's flawed. Your brain goes through the same process for the color red and the color blue, but you get obviously different results. There is no reason to assume that simply because two stimuli are experienced differently that they must be entirely separate processes.

    16. Re:Bad scans by quickgold192 · · Score: 1

      Granted, the "To the brain..." quote was pulled from CNN's analysis, not the scientists'. And like you said, knowing that the "same brain networks that are activated when you're burned by hot coffee also light up when you think about a lover who has spurned you" is one degree of accuracy more than we had before this study.

    17. Re:Bad scans by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Just because it feels subjectively different that doesn't mean it isn't processed by the same part of the brain. I've seen very different things through my eyes.

    18. Re:Bad scans by nusuth · · Score: 1

      Most materialists would accept mental states are distinct from brain states and that mental states are a different level of abstraction from brain activity. Think of a typical desktop computer. If you observe someone else use the computer and simultaneously observe the electrical activity of CPU (and rest of the hardware) at transistor level, you would have a hard time mapping the program function to CPU activity. It would be absurd to hold a dualist position over that hardship, to claim that since you can't tell which program is running and what it is doing from low level analysis of CPU activity, the execution is actually carried out by (or augmented by) something non-CPU (or non-physical.) The program really runs on the physical system, and there is one-to-one correspondence between physical states of the CPU, the software running (i.e. firefox) and state of software (i.e. waiting for /. to load) but understanding what a program does/is doing requires different levels of abstraction. This is actually functionalism but I don't know any hard-line materialists that says mental states are explained away by physical states. Functionalists would be comfortable with many-to-one correspondence of physical states to mental states, materialists may claim one-to-one correspondence, that is as far as the difference goes.

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    19. Re:Bad scans by williamhb · · Score: 1

      If you observe someone else use the computer and simultaneously observe the electrical activity of CPU (and rest of the hardware) at transistor level, you would have a hard time mapping the program function to CPU activity.

      Actually, that's not true -- it turns out that by analyzing the electromagnetic radiation from a CPU you can get quite a lot of information, to the point that electromagnetic snooping of what's going on inside the chip is a published security attack method! But anyway, most of what you were saying is an objection I already suggested -- that a materialist could object it is the nature of the activity that causes the distinction (and so two different activities would scan largely the same).

  4. Broken heart syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Okay, this isn't really related, but it does show that emotional pain can lead to severe physiological effects:
    Broken Heart Syndrome (wiki link)

    Emotional stress can trigger a cardiomyopathy which can kill (possibly from stress-released levels of adrenaline). In fact (quoting from wikipedia), mortality rates in general show that in the year following a loved one's death, women are twice as likely to die than normal, and men 6 times more likely.
    (Though this may have a lot to do with the widower effect.

  5. Not News by mentil · · Score: 1

    I read about this a year or so ago, probably on Slashdot even.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  6. Missing control group by bragr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about the brain activity when your ex burns your arm?

    1. Re:Missing control group by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      I'd say it was a bad deal, and you got burned.

    2. Re:Missing control group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like in: "Oh, joy... The master/mistress is back"?

  7. CNN science articles are for morons by codeAlDente · · Score: 1

    Emotional and physical pain feel different to you, don't they? That means they feel different to your brain. I'm certainly not denigrating this study - it's interesting - but the link to the CNN summary is not fit for nerds. The article's title makes such an irrational claim that it should not be considered for further reading. The journal article's authors realize that a good fMRI scan gets hundreds of thousands of neurons per voxel at best. Even if the data were identical (they weren't) it only means is that physical and emotional pain don't look different in the average of a large functional group of brain cells. fMRI will get you the coarse activity of a brain regions, but not a neural correlate of conscious experience.

    --
    He once inserted random mutations into his code, just so he could have the experience of debugging.
    1. Re:CNN science articles are for morons by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      a burned hand and a kick in the nuts both feel different too

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:CNN science articles are for morons by codeAlDente · · Score: 1

      Not at CNN.

      --
      He once inserted random mutations into his code, just so he could have the experience of debugging.
  8. so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean we can claim self defense for murdering someone who jilted us since our brain physically can't tell the difference between the emotional hurt and real hurt?

    1. Re:so.. by flaming+error · · Score: 2

      "Your honor, it was only in self-defense that I tracked my runaway bride to Michigan and murdered her there."

      Yes, you can claim that.

  9. In other news... by slashqwerty · · Score: 1

    All MRIs look the same...

  10. Morphine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why oh why is there no morphine for my heart?

  11. Physical/Emotional is a bit more complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sometimes Physical pain triggers an emotional response (say, if you were abused as a child, and as an adult, someone hits you, reminding you of the abuse you suffered before). Sometimes Emotional pain triggers a physical response (broken heart syndrome). It's not as clear cut as saying "This is physical, this is emotional, and there are strict limits on how they occur."

  12. selection bias by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    Since only a masochist would agree to participate in such an experiment, the results may not be applicable to the general population.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  13. Losing a Limb by alphatel · · Score: 1

    What showed up on the MRI when the subjects lost their internet connection?

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  14. This is the essence of the human mind. by mtadd · · Score: 1

    If this article tickles your fancy about just what's going on inside the human mind, may I suggest the wonderfully engaging set of lectures on human behavior given by Ropert Sapolsky as part of the Stanford University online lectures available at iTunes U.

  15. Heartbreak and torment by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    heartbreak and emotional torment are no different from having hot coffee spilled on your hand

    If you've seen the price of coffee at Starbucks recently, spilling some would definitely be grounds for feeling emotional trauma.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  16. Now I Feel Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went in for some unexplained pain (later linked to an allergy) and the doctor asked me if I had any stress emotional or otherwise. He said the two can often be linked to physical sensations. I of course handle the latter fairly well most of the time and I responded with the following tune, "Ooo eeee, oooo aaaah aaaah, I went to see the witch doctor and he told me what to do...."

    He wasn't exactly amused, but some levity never hurt any situation.

  17. pretty harsh study... by itchythebear · · Score: 1

    It's like the scientist where like "oh, sorry to hear about your breakup. You know what would make you feel better? Let me burn the shit out of your arm and study your brain. Had enough burning? Here is a picture of your ex to look at. What's that? Oh no, it only seems that she's wearing nothing but my lab coat in that picture.. your prob hallucinating form that lsd we gave you earlier."

    --
    If what I just said sounded like a troll, it was probably just a failed attempt at humor.
    1. Re:pretty harsh study... by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Ha. I've had nightmares like what you described, but they weren't quite that bad.

      This study also makes me curious what effect emotional and neurological disorders might have on the results. Being bipolar, I've experienced quite lot of emotional turmoil in my life (some of it my own fault, admittedly), and what you describe is sometimes how my life feels. Later on, I can see my perceptions and reactions were irrational, but it always feels normal, at the time. I can be philosophical and resilient about an emotionally traumatic event, yet fall to pieces because a friend didn't call me back at the set time. It's weird.

  18. Masochism by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 2

    How does this explain how masochists feel pleasure from physical pain, but do feel hurt from emotional pain.

    1. Re:Masochism by the_raptor · · Score: 1

      The key is "nearly identical brain reactions". I have suffered tremendous emotional pain in my life and it is similar but different to physical pain. Also masochists are abnormal so there is no guarantee they process pain the same way as non-masochists.

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    2. Re:Masochism by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      I call them "Sensationalists" since they enjoy all the sensations life has to offer... Pain releases endorphins, repeated or prolonged pain can cause desensitization or numbness -- Mixed with a bit of pleasure, it's not hard to see how someone may enjoy sex + runner's high == more powerful stimuli.

      Emotional pain is part of the sadist/masochist power exchange as well. Being disrespected, dehumanized, used, and abused (emotionally) is also enjoyed by many of the same masochists. This study would actually support this correlation.

  19. Different kind of pain by lavagolemking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Think of pain in a psychological, adaptive sense, where it's an undesirable stimulus that lessens the chance we will perform some kind of behavior again. I think that's what is being picked up by an MRI. Not the immediate reflex that causes you to pull your hand away from the glowing red thing on the stove, but the part that causes it to hurt afterward, leaving a strong memory of the situation.

    However, I did have a psychology professor last quarter tell the class you can lessen the effect of a break-up by taking pain medication. He said that most anti-inflammatory medications are believed to affect a certain part of the brain, which is incidentally the same place triggered by a break-up. He told us this right after Valentine's day, apologizing for not getting to that point in the curriculum a day sooner.

    1. Re:Different kind of pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the immediate reflex that causes you to pull your hand away from the glowing red thing on the stove, but the part that causes it to hurt afterward, leaving a strong memory of the situation.

      That's no surprise. The withdrawal reflex happens in the spine, not the brain.

  20. I know this seems anathema to /. by painehope · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But I've actually been through a lot or relationships. Everything from one-night stands to one-week stands to three-month torrid affairs to engagement to even one marriage. And I've had a lot of injuries (two shootings, about a dozen stab wounds, gone face-first through 2 windshields, caught on fire twice, etc. ; I've been in a lot of fights [including the knife fights, whether I had a knife or not...and, yes, I came out on top in all of those or I'd be dead], not all of which I won [but the majority of them I did, but when I lost, I lost pretty badly...most real fights are over in less than 10 seconds, regardless of what Hollywood would have you believe], combat, you name it).

    And while a one-night or one-week stand going bad isn't a big deal, finding out that the women that you've fallen in love with over the past 3 months to 3 years is either (a) leaving or (b) done something so off-the-reservation that you can't stand to have her around anymore, love or no love, is more painful than any injury I've ever sustained. Hell, I carried a torch for 12 years for one woman (and even got back together with her when we met up again after about 11 or those years), and it almost drove me insane when I broke up with her for the second time. Something that no amount of physical pain has ever driven me to, that experience almost did. It took me about 10 months to get to the point where I realized that everything bad I saw coming out in her (self-centered, inconsiderate, unwillingness to concede that she might be wrong no matter what evidence was stacked against her, unreasonable demands, etc.) that caused me to break up with her 12 years ago had changed from simple flaws to dominant personality traits in the intervening time. Until I realized that, I dreamed about her, wrote about her (one of my hobbies is writing), and she was never far from my thoughts (except for the rare times that I was with someone else who ensnared my heart the way she had, and none of those lasted longer than a few years).

    I would most definitely say that (and other similar events) that is far more painful to me than getting shot, stabbed, or caught on fire. Physical pain is nothing compared to the hell that one's emotions and attachments can put one through. Think about it - when torturing someone, it's often far more effective to work on their emotions and mind than it is to cause them physical injury. Ask any vet whether waiting for something bad to happen (pre-battle jitters, being in a precarious position, walking into a potential ambush) is worse than anything that happens to you when the shoe drops. Everyone I know (and I can't think of a single man in my family that I know of that hasn't served in the military at one time or another, and in every single war of the past 100 years in many cases) that's been in those situations will tell you that your mind can do worse things to you than anything else.

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    1. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing. Seriously.

      Negative emotions can wreak all sorts of havoc on the body. Acupuncture can be a good adjunct to therapy, especially for long held emotions. You might consider it, if you haven't already found other ways to move on.

    2. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lt. Dan, is that you?

      and I can't think of a single man in my family that I know of that hasn't served in the military at one time or another, and in every single war of the past 100 years in many cases

      They all fought and died, amirite?

    3. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I've actually been through a lot or relationships. Everything from one-night stands to one-week stands to three-month torrid affairs to engagement to even one marriage. And I've had a lot of injuries (two shootings, about a dozen stab wounds, gone face-first through 2 windshields, caught on fire twice, etc. ; I've been in a lot of fights [including the knife fights, whether I had a knife or not...and, yes, I came out on top in all of those or I'd be dead], not all of which I won [but the majority of them I did, but when I lost, I lost pretty badly...most real fights are over in less than 10 seconds, regardless of what Hollywood would have you believe], combat, you name it).

      I don't always drink beer, but when I do..........

    4. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine why you have trouble maintaining a relationship. In spite of the fact that I am happily married I don't know a lot about women, but I'm pretty sure a propensity for knife fights isn't on their hot list. Then again, neither is anger management counseling, so you're kind of stuck I suppose. Best of luck to you, and thanks for your service!

    5. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can attest to this from a similar background. Physical pain can be managed and will Heal. Emotional trauma just keeps hurting and short of drugs, the legal kind, nothing mitigates it.

      As someone who has suffered clinical depression for a long time. The pain from depression eclipses anything physical I've ever experienced. Based on this article I'd go so far as to say that clinical depression could be a short circuit in this portion of the brain.

    6. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pussy.

    7. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by jafac · · Score: 1

      I have no response to that, other than; been there, done that, and completely agree. I would rather be stabbed, beaten and burned, than go through what my ex put me through again.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Ask any vet whether waiting for something bad to happen (pre-battle jitters, being in a precarious position, walking into a potential ambush) is worse than anything that happens to you when the shoe drops. Everyone I know (and I can't think of a single man in my family that I know of that hasn't served in the military at one time or another, and in every single war of the past 100 years in many cases) that's been in those situations will tell you that your mind can do worse things to you than anything else.

      That is one of the morale-killing effects of both artillery, and snipers....waiting for that next one...that may 'have your name on it'.
      Been there, done that, and have the bullet-holed tee shirt.

      There's a reason for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder was formerly known as Shell Shock.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    9. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by painehope · · Score: 1

      I once walked into an acupuncture clinic, for my back and insomnia. They told me to go to a regular doctor. I dunno...

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    10. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by dave562 · · Score: 1

      It is hard to find a good acupuncturist in the States. Unfortunately it is a fairly "new" treatment and is fighting an uphill battle to gain acceptance. If you were in California I could give you a couple of good recommendations.

      You can try to contact these people http://yosan.edu/ and see if they have any graduates in your area. They are the real deal.

    11. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by painehope · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and to top it off that chick I had the torch for is about to get her PhD in Psychology. When we attempted to get back together after all those years, she immediately said "You're just like every other vet/prisoner/whatever I counsel - you have PTSD". I don't care what anyone calls it, I just cope. What else can I do?

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    12. Re:I know this seems anathema to /. by lucian1900 · · Score: 1

      While I mostly agree, there is one aspect of physical pain that I would avoid more than psychological pain: permanent, disabling physical damage.

      I don't wish to belittle what you went through, but you were lucky. You could've been paralysed for life. I would rate that worse than heartbreak.

  21. It sounds fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to know where I can sign up to perform such experiments on people and get away with it.

    1. Re:It sounds fun by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1
      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  22. Correction by davidbrit2 · · Score: 2

    That should read "Proceedings of the National Academy of Scientists Who Are Assholes".

    Reminds me of one of the opening scenes from Ghostbusters. "The effect? I'll tell you what the effect is: it's pissing me off!"

  23. Study Poetry by nightcats · · Score: 2

    Read the poetry of Shakespeare, Rumi, Chaucer, Keats, Coleridge, Goethe, Wordsworth, Rilke, Tennyson, Eliot (I could go on), and the same theme arises: poets have known this for ages and have patiently waited in their graves for science to catch on. It is a very ordinary sort of knowledge, based on near-universal experience. I just think the poets do a far better job of expressing it.

    --
    Development is programmable; Discovery is not programmable. (Fuller)
  24. Weird. by pclminion · · Score: 1

    There's a definite trend in this thread of people saying they'd prefer physical pain to emotional pain. And yet our society looks at corporal punishment like something from an alien planet. "Cruel and unusual," and all that. Caning a thief? Unimaginable. But putting him in a cage for a number of years, subjecting him to degradation and humiliation? That's CIVILIZATION, baby.

    Seems like we ought to admit that the reason we don't use physical punishment on criminals is not because of some moral imperative but because imprisonment actually hurts more.

    1. Re:Weird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like we ought to admit that the reason we don't use physical punishment on criminals is not because of some moral imperative but because imprisonment actually hurts more.

      Either that, or that inflicting physical punishment bothers us (the 'inflicter', if you will) as well, and not just the criminal ('inflictee').

      Humans are predominantly empathetic, and physical pain might be easier to identify than emotional pain. So we prefer to ignore the mental pain (which is easy to do, especially when we don't have to interact with the criminals), than to ignore the fact that someone is being caned or tortured (even if I don't have any interaction with the victim).

      Hell, even in movies or tv-shows. Seeing a guy lead away in cuffs doesn't cause any response in me, but watching a guy get tortured (even though I know it is acting) causes me to flinch a bit (or change channels, if the screams/blood gets too graphic).

      Even in my life, the worst physical pain I felt (stomach cramps that had me screaming) pales in comparison to the emotion trauma I suffered when a loved one passed away. But when I had physical pain, my co-workers were doing all they could to make me feel better and doing little things for me for weeks after. But my co-workers found it easy to ignore my emotional loss once I stopped having any outward reaction, even though I felt hollow inside for months.

    2. Re:Weird. by xkuehn · · Score: 1

      I can't mod you up, so I'll just say that yours is the most true comment on the story.

      It is also a fact that negative reinforcement is ineffective if not applied quickly. Locking someone up over a period of years is less than useless, but a "caning" might actually achieve something.

      And if someone is truly so dangerous that we can not let him out again, is execution not less cruel?

      I find our society disturbing.

  25. Emotional Pain Vs Physical Pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emotional Pain lasts forever while physical pain is mostly temporary.

    1. Re:Emotional Pain Vs Physical Pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emotional Pain lasts forever while physical pain is mostly temporary.

      I'm going to call BS on that one. My brother died back in '77 (when I was 12) and I remember feeling pretty distraught about it back then (especially when viewing the body). However, I barely even think about him nowadays and, when I do, no tears well up, I remember few shared experiences, and so forth. Hell, I can't even remember what he looked like (other than sideburns, the fashion of the day). Ditto for my dad, who died in '89. Time may not heal *all* wounds but it does a pretty damn good job on some of them.

      Of course, it may be that I'm just a heartless bastard. That's certainly a possibility :-)

  26. Bad science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That article wasn't too bad, with control groups and such. Right up to the point where it blurted out "Participants rated how they felt after each task trial using a five-point scale, with lower numbers reflecting more distress".

    WTF? Involving the subjectivity of the target in the measurement process is an instant indicator of poor science. Hell, I'd lie just to bugger up the results of a crappy experiment like that.

    If they'd stuck to just measuring specific objective things, it may have had some merit. FFS, don't any medical people know about the scientific method?

  27. As a man thinketh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so he is. Read the Bible and you would "discover" things a lot earlier.

    1. Re:As a man thinketh... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if by "discover" you mean "associate with a totally vague and nearly useless other fact". And then "after which some idiot would use it to boss around your entire life". You bible people really would think that "existence is mental" = "physical and emotional pain are neurologically the same", if someone waved a bible at you and said "what god really meant to say was..."

      You can "discover" even more things pretty early from the day's horoscope, too.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:As a man thinketh... by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 0

      I read the bible and discovered that it is a bunch of fairy tales concocted by sheep herders to control other sheep herders. Is that the discovery you were talking about?

  28. John Sarno figured this out by dave562 · · Score: 2

    The man has written a couple of books about the role that the mind plays in back pain. When the book first came out it was pretty revolutionary. Now the ideas are pretty widely accepted as being fairly obvious. The man has not said that ALL back pain is related to the mind. However he has laid out a very plausible hypothesis to explain how the mind uses chronic pain to distract itself from deeply repressed emotions.

    1. Re:John Sarno figured this out by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There was an interesting programmed on BBC Radio 4 a week or two ago. Sorry but I forget the name. They talked about an American study where they tried giving people placebos and actually telling them that they were not real pain killers. Despite the subjects knowing they were taking nothing but sugar pills they reported feeling less pain. The current theory is that just having the attention of a sympathetic doctor prescribing the placebos seems to have an affect.

      The difficulty with these studies is that there is no way to objectively measure pain. I suffer from chronic pain and when the doctors ask me to rate it on a scale of 1 to 10 I never know what to say. I have had it all my life so don't know what normal is, and I have never experienced really severe pain like childbirth or serious injury. Any number I give is meaningless anyway because there is no scale, although it does give some indication of how badly it affects me.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:John Sarno figured this out by dave562 · · Score: 1

      For last nearly two years at this point, I have been dealing with chronic sciatic nerve pain. I have a couple of herniated discs (L4/L5, L5/S1) that are impinging on the sciatic nerve. I was not really aware of how my emotions and overall levels of stress impacted the pain until after I read what Sarno had to say. Although there is an undeniable physical component to my pain, it definitely fluctuates based on the amount of stress I'm under.

    3. Re:John Sarno figured this out by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I get that with arthritis too. I have learned not to rely on emotions or decision made when feeling bad because the pain clouds everything.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  29. This has been known for awhile by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

    Psychiatrists know, for example, that certain painkillers can be effective in treating some symptoms of emotional distress, and in lessening the pain of rejection, isolation, or loss.

    For the person who posted the WTF? response, this is an important result because it means that mechanisms for dealing with physical pain can also address some aspects of emotional pain (although as I've pointed out, it wasn't really a new result, but confirmation of something we already knew).

    1. Re: This has been known for awhile by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Following up to my own post, pain, both physical and emotional, affects the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and can be treated with something as ordinary as Paracetamol (clincally, acetaminophen), which I believe is sold in the US under the brand name Tylenol. If the CNN story isn't technical enough for you, try "Acetaminophen Reduces Social Pain: Behavioural and Neural Evidence", Psychological Science, 2010 (this was earlier work, not what CNN is reporting at the moment).

      (That's *Dr* arglebargle_xiv to you).

      >Slow Down Cowboy!
      >
      >It's been 40 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

      What is this, rate-limiting for stoned people?

    2. Re: This has been known for awhile by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Actually, many in emotional pain do seek the relief that a bottle of Tylenol can bring... and liver death quite stops emotional pain in its tracks.

  30. your ex burns your arm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good question. You go first.

  31. Old News by ldobehardcore · · Score: 1

    Hasn't this already been done at least 2 years ago?

    I'm pretty sure I read somewhere (possibly PopSci SciAm, or maybe Nat'l Geographic) that emotional pain looks exactly the same as physical pain in an MRI in 2009 or so.

    Sorry for not linking. I'll look it up and see if I can find corroborating evidence or a counter to my gangrenous mind.

    --
    Hectice, baby, Mercator says hello to you
  32. In the words of Sid Vicious.. by msevior · · Score: 1

    ... violence doesn't hurt.

    Compared to emotional pain, I totally agree.

  33. Also... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Balls (or head) usually don't start to hurt again when you remember you were kicked some time ago.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  34. Crime of depression? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    I mean... hey... this gets to be "proven medical fact", we might as well may start giving out guns and shovels to emotionally sensitive people.
    Also, it becomes A-OK to ram someone off the road if they annoy you.
    And just think of all wonderful implications to self-harming yet externally induced emotions like jealousy?

    Either Kevlar-yellow will become the new black, or we'll start putting antidepressants into drinking water.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  35. No They Don't by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2

    Physical pain and emotional pain are very clearly distinguishable sensations, even if they feel similar. That means that they are not using identical pathways. Because the pathway and the experience are just two sides of the same thing. Identical pathways = identical experience. Since the experiences are not at all identical, the pathways cannot be.

    There might be a lot in common. But they are not the same.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:No They Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for bestowing your knowledge on us. I'm sure the researchers would love to know as well. They clearly don't know anything.

    2. Re:No They Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if you read the article, you'll find that the post drastically overstates the findings. The study actually found that both negative stimuli caused higher activity (than neutral/pleasant stimuli) in some areas of the brain that other imaging studies have associated with pain.

      tl;dr You're right, the post's wrong.

      p.s. imaging studies tend to overstate their findings anyway. Anytime you see some story saying "scientists have identified where ____ occurs in the brain!", you should restate it as "scientists have identified an area that seems to be correlated with simulating ____ while in an fMRI".

    3. Re:No They Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you figured it out! Those scientists don't know what they're talking about, right? fMRI scans are for fools and the ivory tower know-nothings.

    4. Re:No They Don't by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup, imaging studies are only useful because of just how ignorant we are about how the brain works. Their resolution isn't very high. When you think about, individual neurons are what carry messages around, and an fMRI voxel probably contains tens of thousands of them easily, and it isn't like the resolution is really one voxel either.

      An imaging study is analogous to measuring the EMF output of 10 undersea cables and trying it relate it to individual phone calls. Sure, the calls go through the cables, but each cable contains thousands of individual wires. And yes, let's assume fiber optics haven't been invented yet...

  36. fMRI is bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm no expert, but my impression is that pretty much all all fMRI studies, certainly the ones reported in the popular press, are bullshit. My reasons: 1) fMRI records traces of oxygen metabolism, not neural action potentials; 2) it can not distinguish between metabolism in neurons and glia and 3) it requires integration of signals on the order of seconds. It *does* result in pretty brain pictures and gives us all the warm fuzzies about thinking we know something about how the brain works when we really don't. Any experts please refute.

    1. Re:fMRI is bullshit by rts008 · · Score: 1

      While I'm no expert, I have recently read about a recent paper submitted to "Science" journal, and the debate it caused. (I think it was from 2006?)
      I don't know if the debate has been resolved since then...

      Basically the jury is still out on debate on this one.
      The point(1) is correct, (2) is also correct. However (3)has been resolved somewhat. That was the subject of the paper mentioned above.

      Someone figured a way to better the resolution than 'every couple of seconds'.
      Their results pointed to more anaerobic metabolism happening than aerobic. Many others rushed out to confirm/disprove, and I have not heard anything newer than this.

      How does this relate?
      Until 1970 it was widely believed that during 'heavy processing', the brain used more oxygen. In 1970, a couple of researchers presented data that suggested the increase in oxygen used was small(around 5-7%), and the brain relied on anaerobic(lactase) to work.
      The consensus slowly drifted towards this view until recently(within the past 15 years) when the debate was re-ignited by research findings that suggested that the increase in aerobic activity was higher than singe-digit percentages, and was more on the order of around 30%. What seems to be consistent in the debate is that both aerobic and anaerobic metabolism jump significantly with increased brain activity, and that the jump in anaerobic metabolism happens almost immediately, the aerobic metabolism shows around a 2-3 second lag behind the anaerobic.
      Most of the debate seems to be centered on two things:
      1)What is the actual rise in aerobic metabolism?
            different studies show widely varying results for this.
      2) What is the ratio of aerobic/anaerobic metabolism actually happening here?

      My own inexpert hypothesis is that 'under load', the brain depends on anaerobic metabolism until more oxygen can be supplied.

      While my reply was not meant to refute, I hope it provided some useful information for you. :-)
      While I don't think that fMRI is bullshit, I do think we don't know enough about the brain to use fMRI for the ultimate diagnostic tool.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  37. Long known by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    This is news? I've taken over-the-counter pain remedies for emotional pain for decades. And why do they think opiates are attractive to people who become addicts? Duh.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  38. Not Even Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they left you because even their daddy complexes wouldn't keep them around a psycho like yourself.

  39. Who knew?... by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    Stress kills.

    Common knowledge I believe...

  40. So much for sticks and stones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...will break my bones but words will never hurt me. :-(

  41. The two have always been related. by cavebison · · Score: 1

    In other words, the brain doesn't appear to firmly distinguish between physical pain and intense emotional pain.

    Isn't this a flawed assumption? Maybe what they're looking at in the brain, when physical pain occurs, is the *emotional* reaction to the physical pain (ie. distress). So when purely emotional pain is felt, the same areas light up.

    I mean do they know for sure that the brain signals they're seeing for physical pain are just that - signals for physical pain? You'd have to then ask, why would the brain wave a flag to say "my arm hurts" it there wasn't a reason for it - and that reason being to provoke a strong reaction to attend to the cause of the hurt. That is, an emotional reaction.

    So it seems to me the two are kind of linked anyway. You feel distress when in pain. Surprise. So why shouldn't there be similar or related signals going on when feeling purely emotional distress?

  42. A masochist or... by helios17 · · Score: 1

    A grad student sharing an apartment with 5 other grad students, not sure if he's gonna have enough money for his monthly allotment of Ramen

    --
    Windows assumes you are an idiot...Linux demands proof.
  43. Not too insightful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And? People are neurologically linked to each other the same way an addict is linked to a substance. A stimulus is a stimulus, if it causes the brain to release neurotransmitters, it will eventually create dependence. So, the experiment is misleading. It implies that *withdrawal* and pain coincide. 'Emotional pain'? What does that even mean? The study is spun.

  44. Confirmation of Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This goes a long way towards confirming a substantial element of my own psychological model (c. 2007, John-Paul Miller, "A Unified Model of the Human Psyche", isbn 1435700678).

    In the Post 9/11 aftermath in New York, I was struck by my inability to reconcile the sheer stupidity of many of the responses... yet people aren't really stupid... so I dug deeper looking to resolve the contradiction between what people know if they stop to think about it and their actual behavior.

    Once I made the connection (which arose from neural network projects in software) that the almost all of our brain activity is pattern based, I was able to use physical analogies (such as learning to hit a baseball, or a baby learning to stand up or walk) as parallels to help explain how emotional distress occurs and growth is accomplished.

    Basically, I set out to build a model which is true for all people all the time and explains emotional stimulus, perception, response, dysfunction, and growth. I ended up using physical activities as parallel analogies, and ultimately arrived at a complete functional model that describes in practical terms how we function emotionally. So far I haven't been able to break the model, and I've been trying to prove it wrong for nearly 10 years now.

    It's interesting to see research that shows the connection is more than that "they are similar".

  45. Emotion := experience. by Msdose · · Score: 1

    My theory is that there is a one-to-one correspondence between our emotional state and our experiences. For each experience we can encounter, there is a discrete emotional state. This is possible because emotions are produced by neurotransmitters, whose discrete values in combination are able to produce enough discrete emotions to represent each and every possible experience. So by modulating our neurotransmitter levels we can have every possible experience, since emotion := experience. This can be done through drug therapy, hypnosis, religious bafflegab, brainwashing etc. In fact, the whole universe could be an emotional experience dreamed up by our psychological state.

  46. Pain of all kinds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a little tidbit of info. Your diet play's a very important part in how you feel both physically and emotionally. Not to mention your weight and maintianing a healthy one. There are a million diet plans that help you lose weight. But very few that help you lose the weight,and get you both physically and emotionally healthy. Not to mention give you the knowledge to keep the weight off and stay healthy. Science is wonderful and science has proven that for every disease there is a CURE in nature. It all starts with eating right and staying active. I have a natural way for you to get started if anyone is interested. http://ron13146.elite-weight-loss-package.com This site will give you the tools to get healthy. At the same time it will shred off the extra weight. This is the kind of information most weightloss programs don't want you to know. Quite simply it works. So if you are serious about getting healthy and feeling better. If pain is an issue of any kind, then you need this information. Stop hurting and start healing. go to http://ron13146.elite-weight-loss-package.com I know it will help.