Slashdot Mirror


Off-Duty Police Officer Steals iPad From TSA Checkpoint

SpaceCadetTrav writes "A recent arrest report shows that an off-duty police officer from Fullerton, CA was arrested on felony grand theft charges for stealing an iPad at a TSA checkpoint in the Miami International Airport. The theft was captured on video surveillance last month and the officer was tracked down just before boarding her plane."

178 comments

  1. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like she thought she was employed by the TSA.

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Looks like she thought she was employed by the TSA.

      Cops vs Smurfs. Whoever loses, we win.

      On one hand, the only reason she was arrested is because TSOs aren't law enforcement officers. The blue wall of silence (standard practice whereby so-called "good cops" cover up for the misdeeds of bad cops) doesn't apply.

      On the other hand, part of me thinks the TSA just hates competition.

      On balance, good job, TSA. You've caught your first criminal in what, a decade? Congrats. Totally not worth the expense and hassle, but congrats anyways on doing the right thing.

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      On balance, good job, TSA. You've caught your first criminal in what, a decade? Congrats.

      Premature celebration. The TSA didn't even catch her. It was the Miami PD.

    3. Re:wow by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      TSA agents were quoted as saying, "Stop right there, criminal scum!"

    4. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first criminal in what, a decade

      [citation needed]

    5. Re:wow by mkiwi · · Score: 2

      Now if only Rockstar would come out with Grand Theft iPad: Miami

    6. Re:wow by tombeard · · Score: 1

      Well, easier if you bring your own.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    7. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:wow by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

      > _TSA_ didn't even catch her. It was the Miami PD

      What, are you NYPD > PANYNJ them? *chiiet*

    9. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the Miami PD.

      YEEAAAAH!!!!

  2. As Nelson Muntz would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA HA.

  3. News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    stuff that matters
    *sigh*

    1. Re:News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      But it is something that matter!

      It speaks about how even low IQ people crave for the single most innovative and powerful device thats bound to rewrite the complete history of computational devices. Obama farts? It's news if he have an iPad in his hand in the moment. Nuclear power plant flooding, is not news because nuclear power plants don't make/use iPads. Get with the program.

    2. Re:News for nerds by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, Slashdotters generally do not like the TSA and are interested in Ipads. So this is really a two for one story for the nerd community

    3. Re:News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But it is something that matter!

      It speaks about how even low IQ people crave things that are shiney.

      There, fixed that for you.

    4. Re:News for nerds by Stargoat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Show me a /.er that likes TSA, and I'll show you someone who doesn't belong here.

      Distrust of government is associated with competence, technical or otherwise. And most of the folks on /. are people who are competent. Competent and or self-reliant people do not feel the need for government to protect them from themselves or imaginary threats. The competent person is capable of feeding and housing himself. He is capable of defending himself as well, when given the opportunity (not disarmed).

      TSA is obviously abusing the 4th Amendment, morality, and good plain sense. TSA (and DoHS) is bad government. TSA needs to be eliminated and its duties returned to the airports. DoHS needs to be eliminated and its duties returned to the Treasury Department.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    5. Re:News for nerds by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      And most of the folks on /. are people who are competent. Competent and or self-reliant people do not feel the need for government to protect them from themselves or imaginary threats.

      Imaginary threats, yes, but competence and self-reliance alone won't get you to realize that foreign terrorism is an imaginary threat. Most competent people I know don't care too much about it, it's an inconvenience when they want to fly somewhere, and if they're not busy thinking of other things, they might realize the line they're in to go through security is more vulnerable and has more bodies in it than the plane would. Even many of the incompetents I know laugh about fingernail clippers being banned. Still, that doesn't automatically translate into a realization that "TSA is just wasting time and taxes."

      And if you don't get to the realization that it's an imaginary threat, there's nothing illogical about wanting the government to deal with it.

    6. Re:News for nerds by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It speaks about how even low IQ people crave for the single most innovative and powerful device thats bound to rewrite the complete history of computational devices. Obama farts? It's news if he have an iPad in his hand in the moment. Nuclear power plant flooding, is not news because nuclear power plants don't make/use iPads. Get with the program.

      It also matters for anybody who travels with electronic devices. The TSA requires you to take your laptop (and tablet) out of your bag and put it on a little tray, out in the open and all by itself, to go through XRAY. Then you have to go through the scanner, so you're separated from your goods for a bit. I'm all for poo-poo'ing an obvious appeal to fanboism for link-bait, but you don't really think that's something important to know?

      Okay, here's how it matters for iPad owners:

      - You'll lose sight of it.
      - Activate the 'find' feature.
      - Don't go to airplane mode until you're on the flight.

      And for non iPad owners, but owners of other tablets or laptops...

      - You'll lose sight of your gadget.
      - Encrypt your device.
      - You should see if there's a built in GPS that can phone home.

      Again, I'm annoyed with Slashdot's use of Apple stories to serve ads, but I just flew recently and I think there's definitely a lot of 'it matters' here to discuss. I'm lucky in that my iPad didn't walk away from me during the security screening. I wasn't too worried about it because it's the cellular version and I have the 'find me' option activated on it. I didn't realize this until this article came about, but I put the iPad on Airplane Mode before we went through security. That was dumb Dumb DUMB of me! The 'find me' option wouldn't work!

      This thread could easily be salvaged.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:News for nerds by SniperJoe · · Score: 1

      You know that you don't have to take your iPad out of your bag when you go through security right?

      http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/20100407/tc_ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1503

      I've flown with mine in my bag numerous times and I've never had an issue.

    8. Re:News for nerds by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      No doubt you're right, but I'm not confident the people they hire to run those checkpoints are fully up to speed.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:News for nerds by Noughmad · · Score: 1, Redundant

      But it is something that matter!

      It speaks about how even low IQ people crave electrolytes.

      There, fixed that for you.

      FTFY

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    10. Re:News for nerds by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      What? More like "ooh, shiny!".

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    11. Re:News for nerds by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think it's a matter of self-reliance, more of a matter of being intelligent enough to realize that the TSA is completely useless, a waste of tax dollars, and (as you said) rapes your constitutional rights.

      However, I think most slashdotters are intelligent enough to realize that government is necessary. Nobody is or can be completely self-reliant. Good luck getting from California to New York without roads and bridges or airplanes, for example.

      Most intelligent people realize that regulation is necessary. I see the occasional railing against the EPA, but these people are obviously too young to remember a US without the EPA. You young people can't imagine how dirty the air and public waterways were before the EPA. The air around a Monsanto plant was so toxic you literally could not breathe driving past one with your windows down (and few had AC in their cars back in those primitive times). Rivers and streams literally caught fire!

      Government is necessary (but don't trust it). The TSA isn't.

      The competent person is capable of feeding and housing himself

      Not without help. You need land and tools to grow food, tools, labor, and materials to build a house on that land. You need society, and societies need governments. Anarchy results in monarchy.

    12. Re:News for nerds by rhook · · Score: 1

      It also matters for anybody who travels with electronic devices. The TSA requires you to take your laptop (and tablet) out of your bag and put it on a little tray, out in the open and all by itself, to go through XRAY.

      Not if you have it in a checkpoint safe bag. Those bags are made so that the laptop compartment can be laid flat before the bag goes through the x-ray. Saves a bunch of time.

    13. Re:News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, I'm annoyed with Slashdot's use of Apple stories to serve ads

      You're right. In the future Slashdot should refrain from posting Apple stories to placate you.

  4. A Surprise? by hduff · · Score: 1

    No surprise. Cops are people too, with all the usual failings.

    At least this bad cop was arrested instead of "protecting their own", but let's see how he is prosecuted.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:A Surprise? by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      So the real question is... why was she carrying a bag of chicken?

    2. Re:A Surprise? by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No surprise. Cops are people too, with all the usual failings.

      At least this bad cop was arrested instead of "protecting their own", but let's see how he is prosecuted.

      The fact that they are actually applying the law equally and not regarding the cop as above the law is the surprise.

      If only they'd prosecute police brutality, corruption, and intimidation (particularly of anyone with a camera) with such fervency. Then they might stop looking so much like the thugs they're supposed to protect us from.

      If that sounds too categorical, that's for a well-founded reason. The cops who don't abuse power themselves but keep silent when their co-workers do the same are equally guilty. They sometimes call it "the blue wall of silence". I call it the blue wall of cowardice. It is most unbecoming of such otherwise brave people.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:A Surprise? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Another thieving thug with a badge. You're absolutely right -- no surprise.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:A Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a cop from California who got caught doing the crime in Florida. That's why.

      The cover-their-own stuff happens in other cases because they broke the rules in their own district, thus it's their own department, staffed by their own co-workers, that has the authority to go after them. Yeah, it sounds like a massive ethics violation to me, too. IMO, when a cop is accused of something, it should be the next higher layer up in charge of the investigation (local cop? state investigation. state cop? federal investigation. federal cop? federal investigation from a different part of the country.) There's a reason people ask "who watches the watchers?".

    5. Re:A Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad cop was in the TSA's house, so bad cop is being shown who is *really* above the law.

    6. Re:A Surprise? by erroneus · · Score: 2

      Fuck that. I like fried chicken too. It's damned good... well some of it is. I've had not-so-good fried chicken... you gotta know what you're doing and do it right. Just this talk about fried chicken makes me want some. And Watermelon is good shit too. For that matter, I have even developed an appreciation for collard greens. If you want to bash on black people, go after something else. I like the food a lot.

    7. Re:A Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jorge Bastida what's up man? What's going on here??

    8. Re:A Surprise? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      You apparently do not pay attention to what you read, "off-duty Fullerton police officer" was arrested by "Miami police", so emphatically not one of their own, not even the same state.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:A Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it should be the next higher layer up in charge of the investigation (local cop? state investigation. state cop? federal investigation. federal cop? federal investigation from a different part of the country

      Wouldn't the next higher level up be an international group like the UN?

      Or is the level above the feds more like Goldman Sachs and other bankers?

    10. Re:A Surprise? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Cops are like lawyers -- the bad ones give the 1% of the good ones a bad name.

    11. Re:A Surprise? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well they didn't know when arresting.

      anyways... grand theft for an ipad? what's stealing a bag of diamonds then, super double quoattroporte grandious theft? it's just an ipad - which sort of makes it more shameful.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:A Surprise? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      iPads are $800 now, not including whatever else was in the bag too (even though "grand" may be $2000, taking 3 things worth $300-$800 each becomes "grand" even though it's not over the Dollar limit) . Depending on jurisdiction that's grand theft quite easily. I'm sure there's other modifiers for being in a security location and FAA property as well. Much like getting in an honest ARGUMENT with a stewardess is a Federal crime for what would be barely disturbing the peace in an average bar.

    13. Re:A Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get ahead of yourself. Charges have yet to be brought against her. It would be terribly unfair to fire this officer and upset her entire life just because she made one small mistake (and she's sorry!). She won't end up facing the same penalty as someone who is not a police officer, even though she's betrayed the public trust.

  5. "...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by retroworks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read the arresting officer's police report via the link. In case you don't intend to (it's kind of boring), I think the highlight is the statement that upon seeing the IPad in the TSA bin, that she placed her bag of chicken over it. Aside from that, I guess any story with the word "IPad" and a photo of Steve Jobs is sure to be interesting to someone. So off-duty-police crime + IPad and Steve Jobs + Bag of Chicken is the combination that makes this story "interesting".

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who takes a bag of chicken to the airport?

    2. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll. No one had any idea a chicken was involved, nor did anyone (but you!) care.

      The interesting thing here is a paid public servant got caught on camera stealing a $800 technology device. Instead of protecting us, we have our watchers who are committing highway robbery, depriving someone of their right to property when the public servant could have easily afforded one on their own. This story could have been replaced with a story on any other technology product, whether it was a portable computer, phone, camera, pda, etc and it still likely would have been posted.

    3. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the more interesting part is the fact that she makes $86k as a patrol officer. Holy shit.

    4. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by sconeu · · Score: 1

      People who don't want to pay 10 times the going rate for food?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by tqk · · Score: 2

      I think the more interesting part is the fact that she makes $86k as a patrol officer ...

      And doesn't realize airports, of all places, are now blanketed with CCTV. That's practically scary. Where's she been for the last decade?!?

      Potential future Darwin Award nominee? I'll take bets.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might not be base pay. Overtime (especially on state/federal holidays) can really add up. If I remember right, some areas also pay higher for time spent appearing in court (to encourage the police to actually show up for those traffic tickets), which is also going to add up quickly.

      Actually, just googling "fullerton police base pay", the second hit is a pdf with the details. A police officer in fullerton (or even a trainee) starts at $64,449/year, so hitting $86k with overtime is very doable. Plain old 50 hour weeks would do it, no additional gaming the rules necessary.

    7. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Potential future Darwin Award nominee? I'll take bets.

      What odds will you give me that she exits in a manner which somehow involves an iPad n.0 ?

    8. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I think the more interesting part is the fact that she makes $86k as a patrol officer. Holy shit.

      And at the age of 25. I could understand it if it was someone with a generation of police experience, but a new graduate?

    9. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't know if I'd call the story itself interesting, but it is candidate /. material on three points. (1) Slashdot readers do travel by air, probably with more tech bling than average, so this story could be a launching point for a discussion about protecting your geek toys. (2) Geeks enjoy a story that reminds them they're smarter than other classes of people, especially if that class *should* be screened for intelligence but isn't (e.g. cops). (3) People here seem to enjoy an NRA-style "cold-dead-hands" rant when it comes to law enforcement meddling with ... well anything, but particularly mobile technology. So I'm sure that a few thousand readers will manage to squeeze a dram or so of near-beer strength entertainment from this story.

      That said I think it stinks that this got posted an my Lloyd Alexander obituary from 2007 was ignored.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by tqk · · Score: 2

      Potential future Darwin Award nominee? I'll take bets.

      What odds will you give me that she exits in a manner which somehow involves an iPad n.0?

      At $86k/a., she could afford one of her own. A Grand Theft conviction is going to lose her that gravy train so she won't be able to afford to buy one, and now (only now?!?) she knows what happens when she tries to steal one. Will she learn the lesson? Hmm ... Tough call. Can old dogs learn new tricks?

      I expect cops to be a lot smarter and better vetted and trained than this. Silly me. I'll guess she won't learn from this, and she'll be on the docket again in the not too distant future, but not with an iAnything in her posession.

      She shouldn't have skipped the ethics classes. They might have come in handy. I wonder what else she's been up to and has so far gotten away with scott free. One less crooked cop. It's a good day.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by twebb72 · · Score: 2

      I had a cop search my car once -- I was in the wrong place at the wrong time (but minding my own business). I had nothing to hide so of course I said yes to the search.
      He finished the search after about 15 minutes, leaving the interior upside down, shoe prints all over the seats. At the time, I was going to the gym daily, and had taken off my mp3 player only an hour earlier and placed in my console to charge. I get back into the car, drive back home, go for my mp3 player and lo -- the cop absolutely swiped it. I didn't leave my sight but for the 15 minutes he was in my car. My word against his.
      My mistake, I should have bought an Apple product, that way it would have gotten national attention. Instead I get to go around mistrusting anyone in blue, knowing they're only looking out for themselves and will use every opportunity to cheat, steal, and abuse their authority.

    12. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had nothing to hide so of course I said yes to the search.

      This was your first mistake.

    13. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who takes a bag of chicken to the airport?

      I guess you've never observed a herd of fat black women getting on a Southwest Airlines flight. All carrying bags of fried chicken.

    14. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who takes a bag of chicken to the airport?

      People looking to steal an ipad.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    15. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twice I've had my car searched by police. They asked permission, I said no. They said by me saying no that they had probable cause. I don't do drugs, there was nothing illegal in the car. It was a waste of their time bringing out the dogs and all the other cop cars that have to stop to gawk.

      Say no does no good.

    16. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the lesson learned is if the police ask to search your car without a warrant say no, unless you want your things to end up missing without a trace or paper trail.

      But you can continue to assume your $50 MP3 player is worth felony charges of grand theft.

    17. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I think the more interesting part is the fact that she makes $86k as a patrol officer. Holy shit.

      Would you do that job for $86k? I wouldn't. However, like teaching it's an important job. Higher salaries should, overall, mean a more qualified workforce. If it paid $200k you'd have an outstanding police force.
      Try living in a country where the police are poorly paid. It's not so good. You'll get stopped for the sole purpose of extracting a bribe. And that's the best you can hope for.

    18. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "especially if that class *should* be screened for intelligence but isn't (e.g. cops)"

      They are. Apparently if they've got too much of it, they don't get the job.

    19. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by osgeek · · Score: 1

      You were really in the right place at the right time... for the cop.

    20. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You exaggerate a lot. Airport food is only 10-30% more expensive than the same food outside of the airport, especially in cities that have high prices to begin with. The alcohol isn't that bad either. I paid 7.29 for a 22oz glass of Sam Adams. It would have cost nearly that much at most bars or restaurants in the city anyways. At the baseball games, they charge about that for worse beer. I would rather pay the extra dollar or two to get my chicken wings, sandwich, whatever in the airport, than have to eat it before the airport. Eating before the airport would just make me even more hungry when I get off the plane. I love eating at the airport. I don't drive, so the restaurants that are within the airport (all within walking distance), are different than the ones that are normally within walking distance of where I live and work. Plus, in the airport, you can go to a bar and sit alone and not feel awkward, maybe even start up a conversation with the people around you.

      Let's say you wanted a Philly steak sandwich for lunch and your flight leaves at 1PM. It takes you an hour to get to the airport. Let's say you like to be on the safe side and want to get to the airport around 11:30. You have to leave at 10:30. Do you leave at 10AM so that you can make the detour to get the steak sandwich? Then do you eat lunch at 10:15AM? Or do you carry the sandwich with you to the airport, and then eat it when it ishttp://apple.slashdot.org/story/11/06/25/220231/Off-Duty-Police-Officer-Steals-iPad-From-TSA-Checkpoint# two hours old? I would much rather pay the extra 1 or $2 to just buy the sandwich in the airport, eat it fresh, not have to leave earlier, and have something to do in between clearing security and waiting for the plane to board.

      P.S, I bought a bookmark in the museum in the city I was visiting. It was $4.99. At the airport, that same bookmark was $5.99. I consider that extra dollar to be worth the convenience of buying it at the airport, in the case someone was unable to buy that item during their trip before.

    21. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So off-duty-police crime + IPad and Steve Jobs + Bag of Chicken is the combination that makes this story "interesting".

      man bites dog...

    22. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Apparently if they've got too much of it, they don't get the job"

      Very true. Some years back a guy sued the city because he was rejected from the police force because he had an IQ over 100. I don't remember how much over it was, but do remember it wasn't much. Their claim was that he would be bored on the job and therefore not effective.

    23. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      The problem with "ethics" is that most ethics classes are about PERSONAL moral choices... when you start tying your ethical base to just the letter of the law then it's really not "ethics" it's just another form of mindless religion. That's why we can't legalize things because a vast majority of people in the armed forces, legal profession, and police equate "right equals legal" plus what the Bible says. Once you've rationalized away the basic christian rules like the ten commandments, "let your yes be yes, and your no be no", and "do unto others"... the rest is just the rules to the game... Basically we have a society of sociopath RPG-style Munchkins running things.

    24. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by tqk · · Score: 1

      The problem with "ethics" is that most ethics classes are about PERSONAL moral choices... when you start tying your ethical base to just the letter of the law then it's really not "ethics" it's just another form of mindless religion.

      That limits the utility of those ethics classes, but I agree. Which suggests to me the law is broken. If ethical != legal (and unethical != immoral), HTF will anyone be able to determine what's legal or illegal, unless they're a trained lawyer? Ordinary mortals don't expect to be born with a law degree.

      If I can't walk into a potential client's office and reasonably expect them to treat me honestly and they can legally get away with that, the system's busted. Flimflam is the name of the day and the Bernie Madoffs of the world are the only ones who can prosper.

      Trust, but verify, sure but if they're just mumbling legalese jargon, how do you do that without dragging your lawyer along into every interview, especially when there's five other applicants in the outer office trying for the position who're more desperate to land the position?

      The Golden Rule is irrelevant in 21st century USA? Time to kill all the lawyers, to start.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    25. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by twebb72 · · Score: 1

      Your response, while a bit tongue and cheek, is pretty spot on. In hindsight, I would have removed the articles I cared about from the car before he tossed it.

    26. Re:"...She placed her bag of chicken over it" by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Most restaurants or bars I can get 22 oz of Sam Adams for $5 or less. Not sure where you go, even in the city. I also would never get beer at a game of any kind, they never have anything worth drinking. Plus there's a reason certain people have more money than others even though they don't necessarily make more. They don't pay more money if they don't have to.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  6. Yes would have been here by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    If the item in question the officer allegedly stole was anything other than an iPad, would this story have been posted to slashdot?

    Come on, it was a police officer stealing something at an airline checkpoint. Yes of course that would have been on Slashdot, lots of people here have a fundamental distrust of law enforcement and an (admittedly earned) burning hatred of airport security lines designed to separate you from your belongings.

    My real question is why the hell anyone making $86k/year would risk throwing everything away to steal something she could have easily bought? She has problems I think beyond just one theft.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yes would have been here by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      My real question is why the hell anyone making $86k/year would risk throwing everything away to steal something she could have easily bought? She has problems I think beyond just one theft.

      Not everyone becomes a thief to get loot/money. Hell, not everyone in general does stuff for the money. Haven't you ever given up / risked giving up the opportunity for a lot of money because there's something else you'd rather do? Your job isn't "everything", I hope. And never count the sunk cost, right?

      Of course, she might have had a reason to think that particular iPad had valuable data on it, so the exercise might have been just for cash.

    2. Re:Yes would have been here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      she might have had a reason to think that particular iPad had valuable data on it

      Are you kidding? Show me a single iPad that contains "valuable data."

    3. Re:Yes would have been here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she took it just for the lulz...

    4. Re:Yes would have been here by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      All the iPads owned by hot college girls who use the camera for its primary purpose (enabling remote gynecology).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Yes would have been here by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Not everyone becomes a thief to get loot/money.

      That was entirely the gp's point. They likely have a mental disorder which motivated the crime for a reason other than to benefit financially.

      So you disagreed by agreeing and then turn it on its head by offering they may have done it for a reason other than the reason you first offered by disagreement. WTF?!?

    6. Re:Yes would have been here by S.O.B. · · Score: 0

      For every hot college girl there are 10 not so hot college cows. The odds are not in your favour.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    7. Re:Yes would have been here by zippyspringboard · · Score: 1

      Umm... I totally understand what you are saying, but I feel compelled to give you a heads up, call it a bit of a warning. You see, your comment clearly reveals your age. As you get older those numbers will start to shift. Be forewarned, It wont be an unnoticed shift, in fact it'll be disturbing. I prefer to think that with maturity one gains the ability to appreciate the finer and previously un-noticed qualities of those other girls... Could just be that as you grow old you get a permanent case of beer goggles...

    8. Re:Yes would have been here by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      In other words, when you get older, a twat is a twat, tits are tits, and you'll stop minding the jiggly bits in between as much.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    9. Re:Yes would have been here by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      The point was to highlight the false dichotomy: wants money / has a mental disorder.

      I'm reminded of the way the USSR categorised people who didn't love the state and all its glorious leaders as surely being mentally ill.

    10. Re:Yes would have been here by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Risk throwing everything away? She's a cop. She'll be given administrative leave while they figure out some way to keep her employed.

    11. Re:Yes would have been here by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      Easy. Check out how hot the person is before you hack/steal their devices to see if there's any self-made amateur porn on it.

    12. Re:Yes would have been here by saderax · · Score: 1

      I read this three times trying to get it to rhyme. Turns out its not a limerick... Hrmph

    13. Re:Yes would have been here by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      It was just a joke that, for you, lost something in translation. Next time I'll put tags around it so there won't be any confusion.

      And I suspect I'm a bit older than you assume.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  7. ObCaruzo by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So this time a watchman...

    (puts on the glasses) ..was watched.

    YEEEEEEAAAAHHHH!!!!

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  8. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd have to be mentally defective to steal at an airport. They're the most tightly secured and monitored civilian areas.

    1. Re:Seriously? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Unless you're actually part of law enforcement (like a TSA agent), in which case it's like a shopping spree at Best Buy.

      I don't question why slashdot posted this story because of it's loose association with technology, I question it because TSA stealing stuff is so commonplace, I would have thought it was simply an uninteresting fact of life at this point.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TSA isn't law enforcement. If a situation is bad enough they have to call a LEO.

    3. Re:Seriously? by causality · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You'd have to be mentally defective to steal at an airport. They're the most tightly secured and monitored civilian areas.

      No, you just have to think you're above the law. That the cop was wrong about this is the exception and not the rule.

      The norm is that cops who break the law, including those who engage in unprovoked violence against innocent civilians, receive a paid vacation known as admistrative suspension.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:Seriously? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Right and as private security they lack the legal authority to conduct the types of invasive searches they've been conducting. That's the domain of genuine LEOs.

    5. Re:Seriously? by shentino · · Score: 1

      It's more like consent by contract.

      You buy an airline ticket and agree to bend over.

    6. Re:Seriously? by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most of the thieves who work for the TSA are actually a lot more sophisticated than this idiot. My co-worker had a macbook pro stolen from him at the airport. He put one into his checked baggage and when he got it back inside he found the love letter from the TSA saying they had inspected the bag and no laptop. What we did find upon closer inspection was a small, but certainly noticeable incision on the top left corner of the bag. We hypothesize, though obviously cannot prove, that this was essentially a signal to the person who took the bag from the inspection point(where there are tons of cameras) to the loading dock for the plane. The area in between is bound to have significantly fewer cameras and is most likely where the theft took place. He complained to the TSA but got the standard note that they take things like this very seriously and how theft is very rare etc. Basically they said "sucks to be you" and he never heard from them again.

    7. Re:Seriously? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      The norm is that cops who break the law, including those who engage in unprovoked violence against innocent civilians, receive a paid vacation known as admistrative suspension.

      Yah but dude. We're not talking about some minor bullshit like tasering a pregnant woman seventeen times before climbing on her back for an impromptu rodeo on CCTV here. An *iPad* was STOLEN!!!!

    8. Re:Seriously? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      You'd have to be mentally defective to steal at an airport. They're the most tightly secured and monitored civilian areas.

      Secure? Maybe. Maybe not. But if you're referring to secure from theft, then definitely not.

      Example. I'm attempting to clear security in Houston. I'm selected for extra-secure security searching. So my stuff is extra security-secure, right?

      If you said, "yes," you'd be wrong.

      Actually, all my stuff is at the end of a conveyor 30 feet away. I'd like to keep an eye on it, but I've either got to look away for half a minute while being irradiated, or be distracted for even longer by some guy touching my junk. Do they give a shit that my stuff is just sitting there? Is it "tightly secured"? Why, no, it is not. When I'm done with my extra secure-security, I go to find my stuff and it's gone. All of it.

      Good thing I was travelling with my wife. She'd grabbed all my things and was waiting at a bench. But of course someone made sure that she had a right to take my stuff, no? Glad you asked. No. No, she was not hassled as she schlepped away two travelers' worth of carry-ons, outerwear and shoes.

      Seriously, if someone can walk away with two pairs of shoes, one pair of which is not for their size or gender, then boosting an iPad is a piece of pie. Easy as cake.

      P.S. Wife's colleague only managed to hang on to her passport through outbound checkpoint in Chicago due to helpful stranger seeing unaccompanied passport and looking for matching traveler.

      P.P.S. Enhanced pat-down did not detect full tube of Carmex in my jeans pocket. I can't see how a full tube of Carmex poses any threat to air travel, but if you're gonna put your hands in my pants and still don't notice the stuff in my pockets, you may just be there for show. Just sayin',

      Now, perhaps you'd say that you need to keep better track of your belongings. Fine. But I'm responding to the parent, so why no go ahead and read that first, um-kay? Especially the "tightly secured" part. I'd also suggest you give that a try and let us know how it works out.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    9. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it sucks that it was stolen, but who puts a laptop into checked luggage? The odds of losing that approach 100%.

    10. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked for TSA. I took time around my programming job to do it just for kicks for a couple months. I don't like TSA and I wanted to see why they do it. They work hard to bring in a paramilitary atmosphere. They're very open about it. They like to hire ex-military, security guards and people who have that security fetish.

      Most aren't thieves but it happens. Laptops go through without being stolen. It's amazing how many people just toss them in with their clothes all the time. No case, no trying to keep it from moving around. I'd watch TSA employees go through laptops and cameras out of boredom. Playing guitars, waving dildos every single time they came through. Flipping through porn and purposely breaking things in bags. If it said "fragile" that would be taken as "Throw it into the air until you hear things break". They'd catch and fire people stealing drugs, jewelry and the caddy cash in golf bags. Not all of course, but some.

      It's a bunch of high school grads gone wild. It has a very high turnover rate. Lots of injuries and if you work for the Feds they won't pay unemployment or medical injury bills unless you're very lucky. I'd watch TSA employees with bad backs and shoulders struggling to pick bags up. People also left for police jobs or rejoined the military.

    11. Re:Seriously? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      He had 2 laptops and this was in the middle of "oh noes laptops can be used as bombs!" scare, so he figured that rather than get stopped by security because he was trying to bring 2 laptops on board, he would just carry one on and put the other in his luggage..... now he's sold on virtualization :P

    12. Re:Seriously? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      You buy an airline ticket and agree to bend over.

      ... and have your stuff stolen by a TSA agent. I guess the interesting part of the story is that it wasn't a TSA agent, just a generic, run of the mill, corrupt cop. Don't get me wrong, I believe most police officers are great, doing a job for relatively low pay that few people appreciate, but when one is corrupt it's ten times worse than when an average citizen is corrupt.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  9. Re:A simple theft by dtmancom · · Score: 1

    Well, it is SORT OF news since it wasn't the TSA stealing, this time.

  10. Grand Theft? by bazald · · Score: 1

    I'm inclined to believe that iPads are overpriced, but not to the extent that stealing one should qualify as grand theft. Did the owner have the "I Am Rich" app installed, or what am I missing?

    --
    Insert self-referential sig here.
    1. Re:Grand Theft? by hedwards · · Score: 0

      I had to look that up as well. Apparently in CA grand theft is for goods or labor valued over $400.

    2. Re:Grand Theft? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Heh, screwed that up. This was in FL, not CA.

    3. Re:Grand Theft? by ViableDreams · · Score: 1

      Grand theft varies by state but often starts as low as $400. In California it seems to be $950 but they never have trouble inflating the value to charge it as such.

    4. Re:Grand Theft? by idobi · · Score: 2

      In Miami, Grand Theft is >$300

    5. Re:Grand Theft? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I thought that was in Vice City...

  11. Grand Theft iPad? by sehlat · · Score: 0

    There has got to be an idea for a game in there somewhere.

    1. Re:Grand Theft iPad? by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Grand Theft TSA...You drive around various international airports on a golf cart and shoot/run over tourists and steal their luggage. Bonus points of they have any liquids greater than 8oz.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    2. Re:Grand Theft iPad? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      You'll probably need to license that behavior from the TSA so as to avoid infringing on their patent.

  12. Tables will turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll probably just arrest the entire Miami TSA force for videotaping a police officer.

    1. Re:Tables will turn by shentino · · Score: 1

      Yeah, arrest the feds for doing their job?

      That'll work really well :P.

      The next move will be several cops landing on the no fly list.

    2. Re:Tables will turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      next move, TSA bod getting shot resisting arrest for 'obstruction'. Should be fun - just let me get some popcorn first.

  13. Is this one of those places... by digitig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this one of those places where we can expect to see the airport prosecuted for filming a police officer?

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    1. Re:Is this one of those places... by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Hahahha. Oh, god, you kill me!

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
  14. Re:A simple theft by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    News yes, front page news, no.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  15. The Not So Real Surprise by Cylix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While checking through at the airport a few months back I was going through the standard scans. After placing my items in the bins (o so many bins, damn you electronic devices) I'm left to stand while they take a peek at my penis (to determine if it's worthy of flight).

    The agent nearby asks me to keep an eye on my items as they pass through. I suppose if I'm busy watching my things they are free to do other things (like giggle at my pictures). I thought it was kinda odd because who in the right mind would dare defy the TSA under their noses. Still, nearly 20 seconds after the agent mentions me watching my belongings some chick snatches my ipad out of the bin and proceeds to start to walk off. Unfortunately, I can't leave my position of shame and I keep raising my voice while repeatedly saying, "HEY LADY, THAT IS MY IPAD." Eventually, when about 3 or 4 people are staring her down she sets in back in the bin and states she thought it was hers. Ignoring the fact that it was crammed between three other bins that had my possessions and I don't recall her actually picking up an ipad from her newly radioactive items.

    In the end, I kept my things and the TSA laughed at my penis some more. Still, it's quite frightening how easy it really is to both nab someones things and then write off what you were attempting.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    1. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're supposed to watch your stuff, but more often than not you lack line of sight, are too far away, are being distracted by them and can't move if you need to.

    2. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't actually have to take your iPad out of your bag when going through a screening. The TSA makes an exception for the Kindle and the iPad because they are sealed devices. I've gone through airport security many times with both devices without a problem.

    3. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Handy tip: you can leave all electronic devices except laptops in your bag as it goes through the x-ray. This includes iPads. I do this all the time and I've never had the TSA search my bag. I've done it at least a dozen times now and have never had a problem. Your stuff is much less tempting if it is out of sight in a bag.

    4. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I spent a little time as a TSA screener. Take it from me, most of them don't like their jobs and would rather be doing something else. They are barred from using their brains and are likely to lose their jobs if they do anything that resembles "sensible." The best way to get through a checkpoint is to quietly make it known that you know they don't like what they do or how they have to do it and that all you are interested in is getting out of their way and on to your destination. Also, it doesn't hurt to treat them like people and offer a little small talk. You will never see or meet the people making the real decisions. All you get to see are people who probably couldn't get a better job somewhere else.

      And while it is known that TSA people have stolen things, it is actually quite difficult to do that. I know in my time there, things were pretty well watched. The real threat was and still is, the baggage handlers and civilians who go to the airports to steal luggage.

      I'm a long way from defending the TSA, but I know what it's like to do things I didn't like doing. Searching people and their things is interesting at first, but after the first few days, it's meaningless and endless. If you think for a moment that someone's there snickering at your "whatever" you would be wrong. Only newbies would be like that.

    5. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent a little time as a TSA screener. Take it from me, most of them don't like their jobs and would rather be doing something else. They are barred from using their brains and are likely to lose their jobs if they do anything that resembles "sensible." The best way to get through a checkpoint is to quietly make it known that you know they don't like what they do or how they have to do it and that all you are interested in is getting out of their way and on to your destination. Also, it doesn't hurt to treat them like people and offer a little small talk. You will never see or meet the people making the real decisions. All you get to see are people who probably couldn't get a better job somewhere else.

      And while it is known that TSA people have stolen things, it is actually quite difficult to do that. I know in my time there, things were pretty well watched. The real threat was and still is, the baggage handlers and civilians who go to the airports to steal luggage.

      I'm a long way from defending the TSA, but I know what it's like to do things I didn't like doing. Searching people and their things is interesting at first, but after the first few days, it's meaningless and endless. If you think for a moment that someone's there snickering at your "whatever" you would be wrong. Only newbies would be like that.

      I know a bazillion people who would like you to come to their houses so they could shoot you as an intruder. Not me. I wouldn't do that.

    6. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Since you completely missed the point of anything there and went on a random rant in reply...

      What's the difference between a post apocalyptic thermonuclear wasteland and Kansas? At least among the rubble and mutants in the wasteland there is something to do!

      In fact, the whole conversation seems so misplaced it seems like a robotext running on keywords. I believe it's worth a shot to give it a test, no?

      As a TSA representative how many penis's have you witnessed? I want to compare it with the number of breasts I've seen on the internet. (I'm still thinking I lose on this one and I've seen a lot of tits!)

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    7. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

      sorry you have such a laughable penis!

    8. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      The best way to get through a checkpoint is to quietly make it known that you know they don't like what they do or how they have to do it and that all you are interested in is getting out of their way and on to your destination. Also, it doesn't hurt to treat them like people and offer a little small talk.

      You know, I really have better things to do. I don't feel like offering small talk to people who do meaningless searches and enforce utterly pointless regulations (e.g. confiscating bottled water). The job may be unpleasant for both sides (I have my doubts), but in any case it's a lot more unpleasant on the passengers side - and only one side is getting paid for the job.

      Personally I just avoid traveling to the US. Of course other countries have security checks and pointless regulations, too - but most manage to remain reasonably civil and professional about it. (Others are just as bad, of course - but we were talking about the TSA specifically.)

    9. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just doing their job. That's the excuse the Nazi's used at the Nuremberg trials, they were executed and imprisoned anyway.

    10. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope. They don't treat me like a person, so I refuse to show them one ounce of respect. Go flip burgers. Get some GD dignity.

    11. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/TSA screener/Auschwitz camp guard/g

    12. Re:The Not So Real Surprise by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Another handy tip: I always forget to take out the liquids and gels bag from my carry on. They have never said anything about it. Last time I flew, I didn't forget. . . I just didn't bother.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  16. Yet, recording police is still illegal someplaces. by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is really the only argument that ever need to be voiced when arguing against laws that make it illegal to record police in public:

    Who are Police? They are people. Some people do wrong things sometimes. Thus, some police break the law. Making it illegal for others to record the police only makes illegal behavior by corrupt police easier.

    In this instance the officer was not on duty, but it shows that just because you are employed as a Police officer or Government agent doesn't mean your morals are always intact.

  17. TSA will steal your stuff too by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    and cover for each other. According to a local Atlanta radio host he watched as one of the officers took an iPod and other items then left the area. When he tried to confront them they said he had gone home or such. In other words, if they want stuff they know to cover each other and intimidate the flying public with arrest.

    http://mydailykona.blogspot.com/2011/06/tsa-stealing-from-passengers.html
    http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-new-york/former-tsa-supervisor-at-newark-jailed-for-stealing-from-passengers

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:TSA will steal your stuff too by osgeek · · Score: 1

      It's nice to know that Ben Franklin was so incredibly right:

            "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

      We've done this to ourselves. We've given these goons so much money and power to make us all safe from terrrrusts, and now our liberty and our safety are greatly diminished.

  18. Typical Cop by Nehmo · · Score: 2

    Fullerton Police Patrol Officer Kelly Mejia used the well-known stealing technique of placing a bag (in this case, a bag of chicken) http://www.fullertonsfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Mejia-Arrest.pdf over the item and then removing both. People steal cell phones using this method all the time. It happened to me on a bus in Kansas City, MO.
    Kelly Mejia makes 86K$US/year and has been an patrol officer for 6 years. When confronted about the pad, she said she was going to keep it.
    I have found that most people on the internet assume police are honest, and people are going to say this officer was just the unusual bad apple. The opposite is true. If a person is a cop, the person is a lier and a thief. This officer was so used to stealing she assumed she was going to get away with it (because she was a cop) and was indignant when confronted.
    What's actually amazing about this story is that the fellow officers chose to arrest her. She must have done or said something to anger them.
    I'm taking bets. I say she doesn't do a day in jail.

    --
    (||) Nehmo (||)
    1. Re:Typical Cop by Nehmo · · Score: 1

      Fullerton Police Patrol Officer Kelly Mejia used the well-known stealing technique of placing a bag (in this case, a bag of chicken) http://www.fullertonsfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Mejia-Arrest.pdf over the item and then removing both. People steal cell phones using this method all the time. It happened to me on a bus in Kansas City, MO. Kelly Mejia makes 86K$US/year and has been an patrol officer for 6 years. When confronted about the pad, she said she was going to keep it. I have found that most people on the internet assume police are honest, and people are going to say this officer was just the unusual bad apple. The opposite is true. If a person is a cop, the person is a lier and a thief. This officer was so used to stealing she assumed she was going to get away with it (because she was a cop) and was indignant when confronted. What's actually amazing about this story is that the fellow officers chose to arrest her. She must have done or said something to anger them. I'm taking bets. I say she doesn't do a day in jail.

      Before someone pounces on my spelling, allow me to provide my own correction: a cop is a "lier" if she lies in wait for an ipod to steal. She is a "liar" if afterwards she claims she innocently found it.
      I should have used "liar" in the sentence of my earlier post. Corrected: If a person is a cop, the person is a liar and a thief.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    2. Re:Typical Cop by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Fullerton Police Patrol Officer Kelly Mejia used the well-known stealing technique of placing a bag (in this case, a bag of chicken) http://www.fullertonsfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Mejia-Arrest.pdf over the item and then removing both. People steal cell phones using this method all the time. It happened to me on a bus in Kansas City, MO.

      That is a very interesting arrest affidavit. Did you see the "Ethnicity" blank on the form they have in addition to the actual "Race" blank? It has two check boxes. "Hispanic" and "Not Hispanic".

      Racially profile much, Florida?

    3. Re:Typical Cop by vaporland · · Score: 1

      That's interesting if only because NCIC does nor list 'hispanic' as a race. Black, Caucasian, Asian, Native American, yes, but Hispanic is officially a characteristic, not a race.

      I know this because our company did a web app for tracking unsolved cold cases, and the investigators we worked with were quite explicit in making this distinction.

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    4. Re:Typical Cop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US government considers hispanic-ness to be separate from race. And yes, there are Black Hispanics (think Jamaican, mon).

    5. Re:Typical Cop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's interesting if only because NCIC does nor list 'hispanic' as a race. Black, Caucasian, Asian, Native American, yes, but Hispanic is officially a characteristic, not a race.

      I know this because our company did a web app for tracking unsolved cold cases, and the investigators we worked with were quite explicit in making this distinction.

      Hot damn! Does that mean I'm white again, like I was in the early 70s?

  19. Re:Is anybody else not surprised.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  20. Another day, another airport, another crime... by CelticWhisper · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://travelunderground.org/index.php?threads/list-of-tsa-crime-stories-since-december-2010-part-1.127/
    http://travelunderground.org/index.php?threads/list-of-tsa-crime-stories-since-december-2010-part-2.128/

    Granted this one wasn't actually committed by a TSO but as was mentioned above, airport security checkpoints are prime locations for theft because many seem (or are) deliberately designed to separate you from your belongings.

    Tip: You are NOT required to use a TSA-friendly lock to lock your carry-on bag. Keep your valuables inside your bag as it goes through the X-ray and lock it with a secure, TSA-unfriendly lock. If you want to take your laptop out as they insist you have to (many have said they've left the laptop in the bag and the TSA troglodytes haven't said anything about it), lock it to your bag handle with a Kensington locking cable. These steps will help ensure that you're there to watch them if they claim to need to look through your belongings. It also helps prevent them from trying to force you into a private room for a gropedown by picking your bags up and walking off with them.

    And yeah, this is a shameless plug, but the site in my sig is a good resource for tracking TSA civil-rights abuses and coordinating political action to fight back against them. There's good advice to be had for putting TSOs in their place at the checkpoint too.

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    1. Re:Another day, another airport, another crime... by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      Just replying in case I change my sig in the future - the site in question is the same one the links pointed to - Travel Underground, at travelunderground.org

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  21. Re:Is anybody else not surprised.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong, Internet sleuth. The Kelly Mejia in the article is only 25 years old.

  22. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't give a damn whether or not they snicker. They are still violating my personal sovereignty for no damn good reason. Those scanners do not protect us from terrorism, and methods exist that are cheaper, more effective, and less invasive.

    They can hate their jobs all they want...so long as those body scanners are there I refuse to fly.

    1. Re:I don't care by phayes · · Score: 2

      I don't give a damn whether or not they snicker. They are still violating my personal sovereignty for no damn good reason.

      But your personal sovereignty is sooo small !!!

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  23. How ironic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How ironic! I just started reading "The Conservative Assault on the Constitution" by Erwin Chrminsky (http://goo.gl/iCO5p). In his introduction, Cherminsky writes about his frustrated effort to get a new sentence for people sentenced effectively to life in prison in California for petty theft as a consequence of the "Three Strikes" law. Most of those convicted this way are Black and Latino. The Supreme Court consistently upholds these convictions in 5-4 majorities despite the clear violation of the Eight Amendment. This gal will probably get a slap on the wrist, then she'll agree to "get help" or she'll go to work for a security firm.

  24. 86K ? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

    I guess for me, the real shock is a cop can earn that much money. Even in California this figure is quite generous for someone with possibly an Associates degree (guessing, as most cops are in this range) and some time at a local academy (also normally hosted by community colleges).

    There are people a lot better educated and arguably more productive to society making about that figure.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
    1. Re:86K ? by SeaFox · · Score: 1, Troll

      There are people a lot better educated and arguably more productive to society making about that figure.

      Yes, but do those people have "getting shot" on their list of likely risks while on the job?

    2. Re:86K ? by Requiem+Aristos · · Score: 1

      Yes, but do those people have "getting shot" on their list of likely risks while on the job?

      You mean like taxi drivers?

      The risk of "getting shot" as a police officer is not nearly as great as some people seem to think. Most officer fatalities come from car accidents. Most cabbie fatalities come from assaults.

    3. Re:86K ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Education has little to do with contribution to society.

    4. Re:86K ? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      The theory is, pay peanuts, get monkeys. If you don't pay police officers well you get people willing to accept bribes and to commit petty crime.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    5. Re:86K ? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Like, for example, military personnel, for whom 85K is approximately the pay for an officer with 10+ years of service or an enlistee with about 20?

      Cops are chumps compared to soldiers, sailors, or marines. They should certainly not be being paid more.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    6. Re:86K ? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Yes, just about every junior to mid-level officer (along with many many Non-Coms) in the Marine Corps.

      --
      Loading...
    7. Re:86K ? by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      So we need to pay them more than $86k? Because she was more than willing to commit petty (and apparently grand) theft. Possibly would take bribes as well.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    8. Re:86K ? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Some people will abuse trust no matter what you pay them. But badly paid and unappreciated (in their eyes) police officers are very likely to feel they can start to push the boundaries.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  25. Thats probably 86k w.out overtime.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was pulled over by a Sheriff and we got to talking (he didn't give me a ticket, just got a warning) and he mentioned he makes 150k w/OT. Keep in mind, that when he retires he'll get a pension based on his salary....

  26. Re:A simple theft by Noughmad · · Score: 1

    It wasn't a simple theft, it was a Grand Theft. You know, because Apple products are Grand.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  27. So this it what it has to be like... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    ...every time some Apple device somewhere gets stolen by someone, Slashdot has to create a story about it.

    And some people on here have the audacity to wonder why we non-fanbois hate Apple so much - it's like a badly spoilt child constantly craving your attention and something from you....

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  28. Fraud and Gang related? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    It's rather unclear in the form if this is fraud and/or gang related. Are those tick boxes? They have both yes/no tick boxes and a box in which something that could be an "N" filled in. Whoever made this form, should be sent on a training.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  29. Re:up to speed by music65536 · · Score: 1

    ...I'm not confident the people they hire to run those checkpoints are fully up to speed.

    I agree. We must also remember that agents may push the boundaries to enhance their image. Then when they are called to task, they cite a gap in training. Always assume malice. Errors are a gift.

  30. Re:Failings by music65536 · · Score: 2

    ...Cops are people too, with all the usual failings.

    I disagree. Quality officers are supposed to be beyond the *usual* failings. It is quite clear than an officer who absconds with something feels differently about it than a civilian. The difference flows from their duty to honor. Low level officers who cannot maintain their duty are indeed people, sometimes nearing the limits of their capacity.

  31. Re:Airports, of all places by music65536 · · Score: 1

    Is there any chance we are missing the type of mistake involved? We agree that the income should be sufficient and the officer should have known of the cameras. To me this points towards a psychological error. However it is unclear to me whether it is an error of deriving sensual excitement hoping to elude the cameras, or a subconscious gesture of despair by expecting to be caught.

  32. IQ of cops. by drolli · · Score: 1

    How stupid doe she have to be to be a cop and try to steal something in the single area, which is not only probably videotaped, but the best videotaped area for sure, with the best cameras, and where videotapes will be definitely kept for some time?

  33. Re:"Say no does no good." by j-beda · · Score: 1

    Twice I've had my car searched by police. They asked permission, I said no. They said by me saying no that they had probable cause. I don't do drugs, there was nothing illegal in the car. It was a waste of their time bringing out the dogs and all the other cop cars that have to stop to gawk.

    Say no does no good.

    Well, if everyone said "no", they might be more selective on who they wasted their time on bringing out the dogs, etc.

    I also doubt very much if refusal for permission to search is actually considered "probable cause" in most cases. If so, it would result in completely removing any protections against unreasonable search by the mere application of the magic words "May I search that?" There are many legitimate reasons for not wanting a search to be performed beyond not wanting the police to find incriminating evidence.

  34. FTA - She makes $86k/year as a PATROL officer? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    Kelly Mejia has been working with the Fullerton Police Department for at least six years and earns about $86,000 per year as a patrol officer

    What? Holy crap batman. I have no problem with cops getting paid, but $86k for a PATROL OFFICER? Wow... Guess that iPad was worth it, eh? Lol.

    --
    Loading...
  35. career risks by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    The risk of "getting shot" as a police officer is not nearly as great as some people seem to think. Most officer fatalities come from car accidents.

    A coworker's brother in law was Minnesota Highway Patrol. According to him, "there're very few people out there gunning for a cop, but there're a lot of BAD DRIVERS out there." I would take that as a confirmation...

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  36. Re:Yet, recording police is still illegal someplac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not "people" and have not been since 9/10, once 9/11 hit they are all "heroes".

  37. Bad Cop... No Donuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just get my coat and be on my way ;)

  38. Why Has Janet Napolitano ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mandated that the TSA hire fellony convicted sex offenders to "MAN" the airport security check-points?

    Money?

    Sexual Orientation?

    Pervision?

    Hatrad of the United States of America!

    --

    1. Re:Why Has Janet Napolitano ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hatred of bad spelling perhaps?

  39. Re:I Guessed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From you post I just know you have a very small penis. Same as all racists scum.

  40. Power over others sure can corrupt fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cops don't make a killing (till they get their bribes rolling or get promoted high enough!) but stealing an ipad from the TSA at an airport is just plain brainless.

    Stealing in an airport INVITES capture in this day and age, with so many "eyes in the sky" there now, it seems crooked cops are of even lower caliber today as officer intellectual superstar demonstrated with this instance of petty larceny.

    Most Police Officers response (as well as many powerful members of our society) when caught in the act is to deny, minimize and ultimately circumvent punishment, which is not just unbecoming it is reprehensible. Thankfully someone ensured that justice was served up this time.

    On another note, (feel free to stop reading if police give you that warm and fuzzy feeling inside!) I find most people in general to be blinded by the prevailing mindless correlation of how "heroic" police are because of their choice of employment. Their work, for the most part, is admirable but not "heroic" as I see ordinary people take greater risks for others than police everyday. I also find nothing more deserving of general respect than the most under-appreciated member of our society: the lowly volunteer (aka people who actually give a shit about society).

    At hospitals and foster homes you will find that volunteers try harder than your average cop does in a shift. There are some cops who break the mold and lend a hand but most prefer to take pride in themselves.

    I believe that the time is approaching where the better part of society will eventually assert itself, although not without some form of violence beforehand as history has consistently shown.

    Rant end.

  41. Was she a hottie by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    And was there a strip search involved that involved video?
    What, that would be 10X more entertaining than the government ripping itself off.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  42. Mission accomplished by alexo · · Score: 1

    Who are Police? They are people. Some people do wrong things sometimes. Thus, some police break the law. Making it illegal for others to record the police only makes illegal behavior by corrupt police easier .

    That's the general idea, yes.