Slashdot Mirror


Robot To Slowly Run Ironman Triathlon Course

itwbennett writes "A robot designed by Panasonic will be running the course of this year's Ironman World Championship triathlon next month. But don't expect it to win. The diminutive robot won't even be competing in the actual race. It will start the Ironman course Oct. 24 and finish in about a week (168 hours), according to its designer. 'Evolta's height is just one-tenth of a grown man, so we figured out that it would take it 10 times more time,' Panasonic design engineer Tomotaka Takahashi told Reuters."

71 comments

  1. Does not compute by Shorty1911 · · Score: 1

    lol

  2. Where's yer Energizer Bunny now? by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Actually, count me unimpressed. Googling for mAh numbers shows that Evolta comes in third behind Eneloop and Energizer rechargeables.

    1. Re:Where's yer Energizer Bunny now? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Would Eneloop be the best? I would love to know who makes the best ones so I can buy a ton of them for around the house. The Energizer ones I have already seen kick the heck out of the Duracell, Duracell doesn't even make them in the same capacity ranges

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. Re:Pictures of the robot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't click that link.

  4. Triathalon by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As far as this "robot" is concerned, it is a toy. It needs floats to swim, training wheels on it's bicycle, and it runs in a hamster wheel. Heck, it's not even the same robot running the three legs of the Ironman! This has nothing to do with robotics. It is a publicity stunt for Panasonic's Evolta batteries.

    Regarding the Ironman triathalon. I agree with my brother. They should put the swimming last. It would be a different race if you either finish, or die trying.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Triathalon by jfengel · · Score: 3, Informative

      As I'm sure you figured out, that's exactly why they put the swimming first. They watch you like a hawk, with literally hundreds of people out in boats and ski-doos. Having the swimming first means that they get it all over with at once, in a couple of hours, rather than having them be out there literally all day.

      Especially for the full-length Ironman, where the finalists don't finish until well after dark. Having to do the swim course in the dark would guarantee deaths.

    2. Re:Triathalon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding the Ironman triathalon. I agree with my brother. They should put the swimming last. It would be a different race if you either finish, or die trying.

       
      I know you're just trolling, but I still have to point out... fuck you asshole. And your brother.

    3. Re:Triathalon by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I'm confused.... are you agreeing or disagreeing?

      Or maybe your idea of 'debate' is just to insult the other person.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Triathalon by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I'm confused.... are you agreeing or disagreeing?

      Or maybe your idea of 'debate' is just to insult the other person.

      Maybe he's politician.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:Triathalon by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for you, but sadly, no points today. That is a true statement that needs some insightful mods :)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:Triathalon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also getting a wetsuit on after running and cycling 140 odd miles is a bit difficult...

    7. Re:Triathalon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. Put the swim last, and make it twice as long.

    8. Re:Triathalon by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      As I'm sure you figured out, that's exactly why they put the swimming first. They watch you like a hawk, with literally hundreds of people out in boats and ski-doos. Having the swimming first means that they get it all over with at once, in a couple of hours, rather than having them be out there literally all day.

      Especially for the full-length Ironman, where the finalists don't finish until well after dark. Having to do the swim course in the dark would guarantee deaths.

      While that's totally true,from a participant view, mass-start swimming *sucks* compared to mass-start running or cycling. I've gotten to race a couple where they did run-swim-bike and it was vastly more civilized: no getting kicked in the head repeatedly while you're in the water.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    9. Re:Triathalon by jfengel · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I've never run one like that. Especially on a hot day, that could be fun, a nice cool-off between the run and bike legs. Especially compared to an in-the-water start, early in the morning, which can be frigid even in a wetsuit and even when the day is going to be blistering.

  5. PSA: Parent link contains gaping ass by spazdor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    warning: goatse

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    1. Re:PSA: Parent link contains gaping ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is goatse? Goats that I must see?

      I'm clinking it anyway, how bad could it be.

    2. Re:PSA: Parent link contains gaping ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH GOD! It's.... so.. arousing..! Quick, someone combine this with tubgirl!

    3. Re:PSA: Parent link contains gaping ass by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is it wrong that I find goatse to be a sort of comforting, nostalgic presence these days? Once it may have inspired revulsion, true. But now I think: ah, a familiar friend from the 1990s Web 1.0 internet! We have had our differences, sure, but at least we are not like those Web 3.0 types, eh? Perhaps we are even allies now? Wouldn't we all like to see the looks on their faces when a goatse link gets thrown into the social-media mix?

    4. Re:PSA: Parent link contains gaping ass by spazdor · · Score: 2

      No, I feel the same way. I've long since hit the point of 'semantic saturation' with that image, so the visceral shock reaction is virtually gone. In its place is the knowledge that, out there, there are millions of people who played the same gross-each-other-out adolescent games as I did.

      I kind of miss the guy who posted the "brown rope" scat-porn stories about Pres. Obama too.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    5. Re:PSA: Parent link contains gaping ass by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Whatever happen to good ole tubgirl, that's what I want to know. She just doesn't get any love any more.

  6. Re:the tail is too big/bloated to wag the dog anym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. Watch for the exciting highlights on ESPN49? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Not me - I only watch the "Ocho"

    1. Re:Watch for the exciting highlights on ESPN49? by CaptainJeff · · Score: 1

      The Hawaii Ironman is broadcast on NBC Sports.

  8. Another bullshit story by oldhack · · Score: 2

    It's a stupid plastic toy robot.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  9. IRONman Triathlon by CentTW · · Score: 1

    This Evolta robot may not be fast. He may need to switch out bodies at every leg of the race. He may need to switch out batteries "as many times as necessary" during the race (even though the only reason he's in it is to promote how good his batteries are). He isn't a particularly impressive robot/publicity stunt.

    But by golly, he's the only man made of iron* in the ironman race. That's good enough for me.

    *Yes I know, it's actually made from plastic

    1. Re:IRONman Triathlon by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Today I've learned that the human body contains about 4-5 grams of iron. Thanks.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:IRONman Triathlon by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 1

      That plastic roboter probably contains less than that.

      --
      (+1, Disagree)
  10. Weird logic by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They should build a robot 120 times taller than a human. It could run a marathon in a minute, or LA-NY in an hour and a half.

    1. Re:Weird logic by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      They should build a robot 120 times taller than a human. It could run a marathon in a minute, or LA-NY in an hour and a half.

      If they made it a few hundred miles high, it could finish the whole race in a few seconds just by leaning forwards and touching the end flag while its feet were on the start line.

      Now THAT' would be awesome.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  11. What's the point of all this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there something I'm missing? It will be impressive when a robot competes on the same terms as the human competitors. This means:
      Navigating itself
      Being one robot, not three (!)
      Running on two legs, swimming in some sense (I'd tolerate leeway here), cycling a bike that would be eligible for entry
      Powering itself for the duration of the competition

    I don't care how well it does, I would consider it news if a robot could do - or almost do - that.
    This, however, is not news. Boo.

  12. From a triathlete's perspective by jockeys · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is interesting. It's not surprising that the triathlon boards are on fire about this today, mostly with triathletes (on average, very type-A and way too competitive) concerned about the robot breaking a variety of rules:

    1. it doesn't wear a helmet out of T1 and continuing into T2. Result: DQ
    2. it doesn't have a chinstrap to keep buckled. Result: DQ on the bike, time penalty in T1 or T2
    3. it will be receiving outside assistance from people other than sanctioned volunteers or medics. Result: time penalty
    4. if it has any open tubing it is potentially violating the no open bar-end rule. Result: time penalty
    5. if it drafts off anyone on the bike leg, it will be penalized and called out on internet forums as a cheater and a sissy
    6. headphones and personal audio devices are banned, if this thing can play an MP3, it's not allowed on the course
    7. depending on water temperature, it may not be allowed to wear a wetsuit
    8. if it drops batteries or parts on the course it is guilty of equipment abandonment. Result: time penalty
    9. if it doesn't finish in 17 hours, it absolutely doesn't count.
    10. finally, it must have a valid USAT license or risk being banned from the sport.

    Disclaimer: this is a bizarre inside joke for triathletes, don't take it seriously.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:From a triathlete's perspective by black+soap · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with triathlons etc., but surely you could have worked in a steroid or doping reference?

  13. Metric by pjt33 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thanks for converting the Imperial "a week" into "168 hours" for us metric users. Weeks are, after all, even more obscure units than hogsheads.

    1. Re:Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome, asshat.

    2. Re:Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but my week has 40 hours you insensitive clod.

    3. Re:Metric by bernywork · · Score: 2

      Now you bring in hogsheads?!!?! I was still trying to get my head around Libraries Of Congress and velocity of sheep in a vacuum....

      This was originally covered by thereg in 2005:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/24/vulture_central_standards/

      Updated in 2007:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/28/additional_reg_standards/

      And again in 2010 it seems by the BBC:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/10/dollar_coins/

      Yes, this is all UK centric, but it's amusing anyway,

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    4. Re:Metric by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Thanks for converting the Imperial "a week" into "168 hours" for us metric users. Weeks are, after all, even more obscure units than hogsheads.

      I expect all the Americans here thought the European metric week was a hundred hours, which is why we only work 40 of them instead of the standard US 70,

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Metric by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      What is that in seconds, I thought seconds was the SI measurement...

      6.048e5 it looks like (it has been years since I used scientific notation, hopefully I got it right...)
      or
      60 ks

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed a decimal place. 604.8 ks

    7. Re:Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      600 ks, but I understand that this is hard, not as natural as 12 inches to a foot and 5280 feet to the mile where conversion is more natural.

  14. Running or walking? by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In order to actually be running the robot will have to actually leave the ground between steps. Otherwise it is walking. So is it going to walk the course or run the course?

    1. Re:Running or walking? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      So you haven't actually seen the "run" leg of an Ironman, have you?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    2. Re:Running or walking? by AmericanGladiator · · Score: 1

      All I know is that my third leg is the hardest.

  15. Small Animals by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2

    Does this mean that small animals one-tenth my size are easy to catch because they run so slowly too?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Small Animals by berashith · · Score: 1

      if they would go in a straight line. That low center of gravity is a bitch.

    2. Re:Small Animals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004737.html

      Domestic cats run faster than people.

    3. Re:Small Animals by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      How many of those animals run on two legs?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Small Animals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm, chicken!

    5. Re:Small Animals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but animals aren't people shaped. But small people tend to be easy to catch.

  16. You should bring back Kdawson by crossmr · · Score: 1

    2 year old stories, slashvertisements for plastic toys, there really isn't anywhere to go but up at this point.

    I might as well get equally as relevant tech news from TMZ.

  17. 1/10 of a grown man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evolta's height is just one-tenth of a grown man, so we figured out that it would take it 10 times more time.

    I believe what they mean is that it will take 10x *as long as* a grown man. 10x *more* would yield 11x as long, and I do not see how 1/10 size yields 11x time. It might seem an insignificant point, but I wish people would say what they mean and rely less on ambiguous or incorrect wording.

    1. Re:1/10 of a grown man by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      My response would be similar. A pug is about 1/10th my size but catching the little fucker is another matter entirely.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:1/10 of a grown man by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Unless you are morbidly obese, you could easily beat your pug in a 140 mile triathlon. The poor little guy would run for a few miles and collapse. And that's assuming it survived the 2.4 mile swim which, if you've ever seen a pug swim, isn't likely...

    3. Re:1/10 of a grown man by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Hear that whooshing noise artor?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    4. Re:1/10 of a grown man by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Unless you are morbidly obese, you could easily beat your pug in a 140 mile triathlon. The poor little guy would run for a few miles and collapse. And that's assuming it survived the 2.4 mile swim which, if you've ever seen a pug swim, isn't likely...

      How many slashdotters do you think could actually finish a 140 mile triathlon? (In one go, of course)

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:1/10 of a grown man by AmericanGladiator · · Score: 1

      I've done a few Olympic distance tris. I've done a couple of 100-mile bike rides (MN Ironman ride). I'm still not crazy enough to attempt an Ironman distance tri.

  18. gap.zip by tepples · · Score: 1

    I've long since hit the point of 'semantic saturation' with that image [on the front page of Goatse], so the visceral shock reaction is virtually gone.

    Goatse is the third image in a set of 40 (highly NSFW). Do you get a shock reaction to the less familiar pictures among those? What about the "pain series" (so NSFW I won't even link them)?

    1. Re:gap.zip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but no.... Nice try though. After seeing such cultural expressions as stretched ear lobes and lip plates, this seems only a bit more strange. Nothing compared to a first-time goatse exposure.

      'Tis a pretty freaky example of what's possible with human anatomy. I'll give you that. Cheers.

  19. Win! by russotto · · Score: 2

    In a bizarre twist, despite it's obscenely poor time, the robot was declared the winner of the Ironman triathlon, as it was the only iron man who entered.

  20. these fucking Japanese guys are creating the futur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These fucking Japanese guys are creating the future. This is the fucking future, it is so clear on 5 dried mushrooms I took 4 hours ago. It is the fucking future, Now! God bless them.

  21. Other Sports by raymorphic · · Score: 1

    It would be fun to see robots doing other sports.

    1. Re:Other Sports by pmontra · · Score: 1

      It's easy to watch robot horses racing on TV. Those horses have wheels instead of legs and jockeys are fastened and shielded in a protected saddle because of the speed those robots can reach. The historic tracks are Indianapolis, Monaco and Monza. There are also some unofficial steeplechasing races even if those robots don't seem very fit for that.

    2. Re:Other Sports by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Autonomous robots, of course. Otherwise if you allow r/c it just becomes another battlebots fad. How are we going to prevent the problems that have led stock-car racing to become so rule-bound and anything-but-stock?

  22. That would be a Union week, I believe by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    And, technically, that 40 is made up of at least 8 hours of break, iirc.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  23. Size doesn't matter by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    That is what I believe and nothing is going to make me change my mind.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  24. I, for one will root for this robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QWOP, you have my support!