Slashdot Mirror


Ballistic Clipboard Holds Papers, Stops Bullets

Zothecula writes "Although police officers in most countries are issued bulletproof vests, they don't necessarily wear them at all times — would you want to heave one of those things around for an entire shift? What they do often carry, however, are clipboards. Taking the "every little bit helps" approach, Ohio's IMPACT Armor Technologies has put two and two together, and come up with something that should actually offer some protection — a Ballistic Clipboard."

161 comments

  1. Ok, so it holds paper ... by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

    And it stops bullets, which means it can probably stop rock too.

    But what about scissors?

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      TFA says it's effective against knives, scissors are a pair of knives together, so yes. No mention of lizards or Spock though...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by Mikkeles · · Score: 2

      If they make a round one with razor edges, they could have the Oddjob Ballistic Clipboard!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      And it stops bullets, which means it can probably stop rock too.

      But what about scissors?

      In Soviet Russia Clipboard stops YOU!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by Surt · · Score: 3, Funny

      I got the impression that was stabby knives. Scissors are slicy knives, and it might make a crucial difference.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0

      Pedants ruin everything.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about Oddjob's flying hats?

    7. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2

      Here at S.H.I.E.L.D., all of our agents carry bullet-proof clipboards, which are a penis-envy substitute for Captain America's large shield and red trunks. We also have rainproof ponchos which are the envy of evil henchmen the world over. However, the ponchos can't stop a 500 foot-pound slug like the clipboards can. Oooh. that's gonna leave a bruise.

    8. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Roshambo is serious business.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2

      I joke that my Model M keyboard can stop a bullet. Haven't tried it yet, though :-).

    10. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by Dewin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Knowing people's fanatical devotion to their model M keyboards, I think they'd rather take the bullet than let the keyboard do it :-p

      --
      Of course nobody reads the FAQ! If people read the FAQ, the Questions wouldn't be so Frequently Asked.
    11. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by GungaDan · · Score: 1, Informative

      WTF is that? Rambo's homosexual African-American cousin, or some kind of Jewish holiday?

      I think the word you're looking for is rochambeau.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    12. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by nschubach · · Score: 3, Funny

      The real question is: If a bullet hits a Model M, would it make more noise than someone typing on it?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    13. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by Surt · · Score: 1, Informative
      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    14. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Meh, the Combinatorics don't work for a 6-player battle. Each person has 5 ways to win or lose, and there's no uniform distribution for the 25 possible non-identity (rock-vs-rock) states. Someone has to have 3 winning combinations or more, someone else gets stuck with at best 2.

      We either have to have a 7th participant (or at least an odd one), or Spock Must Die* (sorry, couldn't resist the TOS reference) to get us back to 5, which had that elegant pentagram diagram that gave each participant 2 wins and 2 losses.

      * yeah, I could have chosen the clipboard to die, but that obviates this whole discussion, and a 6-player game shows everyone else nicely balanced at winning 2 and losing 3 states.

    15. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by WrecklessSandwich · · Score: 1

      Toughbooks can take an assault rifle round. I don't have a link, but the story goes something like this:

      It was early in the Iraq invasion, when unarmored humvees were still common. The soldier was in one of said humvees with his Toughbook at his hip. They started taking AK fire, and a round ripped through the door, went through the laptop screen, and cratered in the keyboard. They replaced the screen and the keyboard and sent him on his merry way.

    16. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute... it's a clipboard (i.e, stiff enough to write on), and bulletproof, but you think your scissors will shear it? Comparison to a thin sheet of tyvek or kevlar probably means they're only at risk to a really big set of shears (not scissors) with massive force. Meanwhile, stabby weapons do pose a piercing risk to kevlar.

    17. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      In a life-or-death situation, I'd probably let the keyboard take the bullet, but only because I still have a stockpile of 7 more.

      It would be a different story if I were down to my last, say, 5...

    18. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by sconeu · · Score: 2

      What about steely knives? Or is it that they just can't kill the beast?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    19. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      Kif, we have a conundrum.

    20. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      In a life-or-death situation, I'd probably let the keyboard take the bullet, but only because I still have a stockpile of 7 more.

      What was your address again?

    21. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Well, the last thing I remember, I was running for the door.

    22. Re:Ok, so it holds paper ... by antdude · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't matter since people, like my female co-workers, would complain. :( See http://aqfl.net/node/5825 for the details and a poll.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  2. Momentum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So instead of getting a bullet hole in their chest, they'll get a clipboard blugeoning their face?

    1. Re:Momentum by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's your point? Tiny piece of metal travelling through body shredding internal organs vs. large surface area of clipboard leaving some bruising. I know which one I'd prefer.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    2. Re:Momentum by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Momentum is, indeed, a problem(yes, you will get some exciting bruises and/or broken bones); but blunt trauma over a fairly large area is more of a "oh Fuck is that going to hurt in the morning" problem, while a bullet hit somewhere specific is a trifle more serious...

    3. Re:Momentum by chill · · Score: 1

      You might not want to use popular media such as television, movies or video games, for accurate representation of physics.

      Getting shot with a handgun bullet won't cause you to flip head-over-heels, nor your head to explode.

      Mass plays an important role here.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:Momentum by wmbetts · · Score: 1

      The bullet?

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    5. Re:Momentum by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Only on the first shot. The officer will drop the thing when the first round hits it. If he was holding it in his strong hand, he may not be able to return fire with his bruised/broken fingers.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    6. Re:Momentum by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A typical rifle will fire a 0.0042 kg bullet at a speed of 965 m/s. The clipboard weighs 0.907 kg (more if it has paper on it, obviously). Assuming an elastic collision, conservation of momentum means that the clipboard will be travelling at a little under 4.5m/s immediately after impact (in the real world, it will be less). If it's held in your hands and are not completely limp wristed, then by the time it impacts with your face it will have significantly less kinetic energy than if someone took the clipboard and hit you in the face with it. Clipboards are very easy to obtain, yet are rarely used as offensive weapons, so I presume that this wouldn't hurt very much...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Momentum by Canazza · · Score: 2

      However, Moments come into play too. With your wrist as the fulcrum, hitting the middle or far edge of the clipboard is still going to send it some distance back towards you. If it doesn't cause bruising to the impact site, it's probably going to sprain your wrist.

      all preferable to a bullet in the gullet.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    8. Re:Momentum by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      Oh, come on! Using actual physics and common sense is just HARSH, people are trying to have a good bashing over completely non-realistic fears here!

      Shame on you, next time leave any common sense back home when you're venturing to ./

    9. Re:Momentum by Co0Ps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can make the comparison even simpler. Stopping a bullet with the clipboard takes just as much energy as resisting the recoil from the gun you fired with, so with a steady grip on the clipboard you can take the bullet with no problem.

    10. Re:Momentum by mr1911 · · Score: 1

      Except that the majority of rifle bullets will pass right through the clipboard. You may have a chance against a handgun bullet.

      This is a ridiculous idea anyway. Folks killed wearing body armor are often struck at an angle where the armor does not offer protection - along the sides and/or the armpit area. Do you really anticipate a cop that decides not to wear body armor that day will walk around with a few clipboards positioned appropriately around their body to offer protection?

      Clever marketing gimmick? Yes. Real protection when someone decides to shoot at you? No.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    11. Re:Momentum by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Getting shot while wearing a bullet proof vest HURTS A LOT!!!

      All the vest does is stop the bullet from penetrating, it does not absorb much of the energy. Getting shot by a pistol while wearing a bullet proof vest will knock you on your ass and you will be in pain. Getting shot in your clipboard, painless.

      This would be the bullet proof vests that a standard cop would wear, not the hard plate ones like the military uses.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    12. Re:Momentum by mr1911 · · Score: 1

      So the clipboard absorbs all the energy? Hint: not unless you are holding it very firmly completely perpendicular to the path of the bullet. The clipboard and/or bullet will go somewhere.

      The "knock you on your ass" phenomena is a TV/movie taught thing that has actually come to pass in many cases because people learned that is what is supposed to happen. It will not feel good, but it will not knock you down. As far as the pain/knockdown goes, it is probably more with body armor than without. A full metal jacket bullet will pass through soft tissue unless it hits bone -- it is not uncommon for someone to not know they have been shot and the wound often bleeds little or not at all. The body armor will stop the bullet and transfer the energy to the wearer's body similar to being hit with the end of a baton -- it will be hard to miss, but it won't knock you down like you see in the movies.

      The difference between soft body armor and the armor with plates is that the plates are designed to stop higher velocity (rifle) rounds. They both have limits, and neither of them is "bullet proof".

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    13. Re:Momentum by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It spreads the impact and does actually absorb quite a lot of the energy. Think of it as a cone radiating from the impact point and you'll get an idea as to why they are so thick. Since they are not a continuous single material a shock wave can't go in a direct path either so what hits you on the far side of the vest is very different to getting hit directly with a bullet.
      The miltary ones appear to be similar to civilian bulletproof material only with extra metal plates on the outside and extra polycarbonate on the inside. If you shoot a guy wearing nothing but thin steel plates the shock wave gets transmitted far more than only thin sheets of polycarbonite plastic because the plastic is better at absorbing energy. The metal is to stop sharp objects that don't spread and would cut through the plastic (eg. metal fragments or bayonets). If it was all solid metal you'd need something as thick as a BBQ plate to stop the bullet and absorb enough energy to handle being shot at by 19th century pistols at range. Something with more powerful bullets is likely to put a big dent in the metal that goes out the other side, transmits a barely reduced shock wave to your body and turns your flesh to mush at the point of impact. The armour will be barely damaged but the wearer would be a mess. That's why the military stuff is metal AND plastic fibres with lots of layers to break up the path of a shock wave. A lot of energy from an impact is expended just moving plastic fibres around instead of turning the wearers flesh to mush.

  3. How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can even buy sth like that from thinkgeek (which is a sister company of slashdot) for quite some time now: http://www.thinkgeek.com/interests/dads/e769/

  4. Simpsons did it. by eparker05 · · Score: 1

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/supplies/e769/?srp=1

    Even if Thinkgeek wasn't already selling a similar product, how is this news?

    1. Re:Simpsons did it. by Thruen · · Score: 1

      Damn, beat me to it. As far as how this is news, you must have been absent from Slashdot for the steady decline it's taken. The new slogan is "News is for nerds, f**k you guys."

    2. Re:Simpsons did it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you not watch the video!?!?! It has a handle!!!

    3. Re:Simpsons did it. by Amouth · · Score: 3, Informative

      it's also 2/3 the weight with a higher rating. i'ts also 3 times the price..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    4. Re:Simpsons did it. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure it got shortened to just "Fuck You" a couple years back.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:Simpsons did it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause these douchebags charge 3 times as much and have a government contract. Now that is news.

      Government over pays for more shit, film at eleven.

    6. Re:Simpsons did it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but can it blend?
      uh i mean can it stop a magnum?

  5. Vibranium by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Wonder if Captain America ever used his shield as clipboard (i think he actually did in the movie), if so we have prior art if they try to patent this.

    1. Re:Vibranium by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Wonder if Captain America ever used his shield as clipboard (i think he actually did in the movie), if so we have prior art if they try to patent this.

      I remember Politeness Man wielding similar devices, perhaps this would be the perfect device for Bureaucrat Man or Safety Inspector Man or any of dozens of new super heroes - the comic book biz really needs them, they've been beating to death the heroes they've got.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Vibranium by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      It's still innovative to make it functional. Sure, the concept of a bullet-proof clipboard may be obvious, but actually figuring out how to layer the materials so that it's a) flat, b) rigid enough to write on c) flexible enough not to shatter from a bullet, and d) light enough to carry easily could still easily be a patentable process.

      The way you're doing it, a company that invents a warp-drive wouldn't be able to patent it because Star Trek thought of it!

    3. Re:Vibranium by Bosconian · · Score: 1

      Furthering this line, it's too bad the Sanctuary TV show ran very weird with "The Adjuster" and IMO squandered a rich concept with pantomime plots and cardboard characters...

      Here are a few more likely candidates for the use of such a super-weapon:

      "The Accountant" in a 3-piece navy blue suit with black spats and shiny patent leather shoes. Gadget pens galore and a HUD in '50s style astro-man Ray-Ban prescription spectacles. Ultra-tech (TM) crime-fighting 10-key adding machine back at the office. Secret identity is a common unkempt thug.

      "The Auditor," able to detect the finest discrepancies in figures, measurements, weights, language, or amounts. The detectives detecting.

      "Coach." Woe to the "player" he calls off the field with his debilitating Ampli-Sonic (TM) whistle attached to a whiplash lanyard. Airjet track shoes let him run laps around evildoers and shout inspirational insults about their lack of motivation and worthiness to be on his field. Good Game!

      Unfinished ideas- The Manager (or Super PHB), The PollTaker / SurveyMan, and The Activist.

      --
      Scarce, scared, scarred, sacred... -Col. Bruce Hampton
  6. Can you say... by Microlith · · Score: 1

    Slashvertisement?

    I knew you could! This one isn't even interesting.

    1. Re:Can you say... by Pope · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's worse, IMO: a blog copied from a blog copied from a blog copied from a press release. The web is turning into nothing but content farms.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:Can you say... by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 1

      It's worse, IMO: a blog copied from a blog copied from a blog copied from a press release.

      I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!

      The web is turning into nothing but content farms.

      Everybody knows you never go full retard.

  7. Census-takers nationwide breathe a sigh of relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bringing the census to rough neighborhoods just got a little safer.

  8. old news by pbjones · · Score: 1

    been done before, using recycle body armour plates. Can't be exported to other geek filled countries, IIRC.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  9. ThinkGeek by Real_Reddox · · Score: 1
    --
    I spent five minutes stealing cool sigs and all I got was this.
    1. Re:ThinkGeek by kalel666 · · Score: 1

      It goes back waaaaayyyyy farther than that: http://youtu.be/ezBdC6l3LRU

      Yikes.

      --
      I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  10. Interesting.. by Mordermi · · Score: 2

    This is the second article I've seen recently about a product that has been on Thinkgeek.com for a while. First the caffeinated jerky and now this. The one on Thinkgeek seems to be different but the concept is the same, holds papers and stops bullets. It seems the Thinkgeek one doesn't stop .357 and .44 mag though.

  11. Tactical clipboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...perfect to go with your tactical pen.

    You think I'm kidding.

  12. RTFA ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is also said to protect against knives and blunt weapons."

  13. Yeah, but does it run on Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there such extension for the X buffer? I don't think it's a good idea if this feature is limited to the clipboard of Windows.

    1. Re:Yeah, but does it run on Linux? by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Yes. But you have to edit xorg.conf, and we all know what that means.

    2. Re:Yeah, but does it run on Linux? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      It means I'd have to create xorg.conf first. ;)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Yeah, but does it run on Linux? by Zinho · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes. But you have to edit xorg.conf, and we all know what that means.

      That your day is ruined and the next week is going to suck?

      --
      "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  14. How it'll work. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    1) Law enforcement sees product, laughs at the idea.
    2) Manufacturer lobbies Congress to pass bill with massive federal grant for their new toy
    3) Law enforcement brass around the country buy these with federal funds
    4) Law enforcement rank-and-file take them home and give them to their kids
    5) Repeat

    1. Re:How it'll work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got several cops in my family, including my father, and the only freebies I ever got were promotional cards featuring the local NFL franchise and a couple free rides in parades. No, not true. A friend of mine who worked as a volunteer for a gang task force gave me some "junior deputy" stickers, too.

      If you think a department is going to use federal funds for something so small, you're confused. They're going to buy their SWAT guys a tank they'll never use.

      They might *mandate* them, but it will be up to the officers to purchase them, just like uniforms.

      Also, even though the cops I know all hate wearing their bullet proof vests, they all wear them because they, you know, don't want to die. So this solves a problem I don't think really exists. Not to mention, do cops even use clipboards? I've never seen that.

  15. most useful purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sucking tax payers money from the police budget ...

  16. Copyright violation? by WoOS · · Score: 1

    Unless Zothecula=Ben Coxworth (which one never knows nowadays) this looks very much like a copyright violation. It is a 1:1 copy of the first paragraph of the referenced article from Ben. And Ben at least took some effort to reformulate when he took it from http://www.ohgizmo.com/2011/11/08/this-clipboard-could-save-your-life/.

    But then, does crowdvertisement care about copyright?

    1. Re:Copyright violation? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It can be argued as fair use. Considering it's a news article, that only an excerpt was copied and that there's a link to the original work, and that damages to the original author seem hard to justify, it's not clear whether it's a copyright violation or not.

  17. Proof Again by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once more proof that there is a real solution to every imaginary problem.

    As we have watched violent crime rates plummet, it makes perfect sense to be thinking about how to protect the ever increasing number of police on the streets, from all of the violent crime that would have endangered them 25 years ago when violent crime was a really serious issue, and the crack wars had bullets flying in the cities.

    Yes, yet another brilliant solution to a totally nonexistent problem. Now that we have a police force that primarily goes around directing traffic on details, pulling people over for the most minor infractions of the letter of the driving rules, and spending copious amounts of time sitting by the side of the road gabbing on their cell phones, or texting (the most common activities that I see cops working diligently at), its clear that we need such devices to protect them from the nearly infinite numbers of bullets which are not flying towards them.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:Proof Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed, the only reason why the war on drugs will never end is the huge number of people and companies that depends on it to keep they jobs and business

    2. Re:Proof Again by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Not just that, even pot. Once they legalize pot (which, has seen such a demographic shift that I think its likely to be a problem for them big time) well... pot users make up a group more than twice as large as the next 3 major illicit drugs combined. The war on drugs really is a war on pot users more so than anything else.

      Once that ends, and more than half of the "problem" is now legalized.... well.... thats an aweful lot of prison gaurds, cops, judges (federal and state), etc who all.... will have little to do but twiddle their thumbs.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Proof Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to this article, you are entirely wrong.

        Excerpt:

      Variances in the number of police officers killed from year to year are common. In 2009, 117 were killed, a 50-year low, compared with 160 killed in 2010 – 59 of them in shootouts. But in five of the past 10 years, the number of police officer deaths topped 160, making the decade almost as dangerous for police as the street wars of the 1970s, when the average number of officers killed per year hovered around 200. And in the gangster heyday of the 1920s, about 150 died every year.

    4. Re:Proof Again by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      How many of those 160 killed last year were shot through a clipboard?

    5. Re:Proof Again by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Ok, however, I said overall violent crime:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Violent_Crime_Rates_in_the_United_States.svg

      So.... as we can see...pretty nice drop since the early 90s, almost 20 years now.

      I am pretty unimpressed by the articles overall treatment of possible reasons, since, I would think that such a long term drop in crime would tend to indicate that sucha spike in one area must have some sort of underlying cause. They mention, for example, the increase in police deaths due to auto accidents and mention distraction but.... none of these numbers are calibrated for the number of police. Realistically, if you were to say.... double the number of police on the road (for example), you would expect a doubling of the numbers that die due to auto accidents. They talk of "slashed budgets" but... are they correlating slashed budgets with deaths? Are they happening in the same places?

      How about mexican drug wars? They seem like likely candidates to supply these new "hardened criminals" and are already known for violence.

      In any case.... overall violent crime has gone from ~800 incidents per 100,000 people down to under ~500, which is a a per capita decrease of almost 50% so I wasn't "completely wrong". It just so happens, that we have a couple of years where that number was higher.... not enough to really call a trend yet tho.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    6. Re:Proof Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you tie overall violent crime to police deaths? Except that police deaths are a (small) component of violent crime, they have little to do with each other. For instance, it would be great if rape (a violent crime) was down, but that has nothing to do with the chances of a cop getting shot during a traffic stop.

    7. Re:Proof Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that all those would-be violent criminals, that have been absent for a few years, will soon be returning from Afghanistan and Iraq.
      While it's true that some will take up arms with local police forces, most will just go back to bashing people, robbing stores and banks and running drug operations.

    8. Re:Proof Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once more proof that there is a real solution to every imaginary problem.

      As we have watched violent crime rates plummet, it makes perfect sense to be thinking about how to protect the ever increasing number of police on the streets, from all of the violent crime that would have endangered them 25 years ago when violent crime was a really serious issue, and the crack wars had bullets flying in the cities.

      Yes, yet another brilliant solution to a totally nonexistent problem. Now that we have a police force that primarily goes around directing traffic on details, pulling people over for the most minor infractions of the letter of the driving rules, and spending copious amounts of time sitting by the side of the road gabbing on their cell phones, or texting (the most common activities that I see cops working diligently at), its clear that we need such devices to protect them from the nearly infinite numbers of bullets which are not flying towards them.

      Ok, well go join the san francisco police department. I hear they make $100,000 just to sit on their asses all day.

  18. I've worked in offices... by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...where this would have come in handy. Some of my coworkers are, um, grumpy.

    1. Re:I've worked in offices... by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Don't you want an offensive clipboard rather than a defensive one?

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    2. Re:I've worked in offices... by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      Are you offering to paint goatse on it or something?

    3. Re:I've worked in offices... by need4mospd · · Score: 1
      John, if you don't get that TPS report on my desk by 5 instead of surfing slashdot, you're gonna wish you had one of these clipboards!

      -Your boss

    4. Re:I've worked in offices... by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      But boss, I couldn't finish the TPS report because my computer is down! -John

  19. Ballistic protection vs weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite simply, alot of police work doesn't involve any danger. In most cases, the weight it just unwarranted.

    That said, it's a good idea just to have that option. If they could somehow carry it around their chest/heart, it can save their lives against small arms which is something they might see. Though how many cops on patrol do you see ever carrying a clip board... much less bring it along with them when chasing down someone.

    1. Re:Ballistic protection vs weight by 517714 · · Score: 1

      If they added a donut holder would it be worth the weight penalty? It would provide incentive towards carrying.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  20. Statistics by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Ok, so how likely is this thing to be used?

    What previous data do we have? How many police clipboards are hit by bullets in any given year? How many non-police clipboards?

    What is the likelihood that someone will be able to position his clipboard to the proper position when someone is shooting at him? Test it by having one of the developers hold one up while someone else randomly shoots at him, and see how many of the bullets he can stop.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:Statistics by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Not at all.

      Police don't use clipboards for anything anymore. Because most of them in the western world have moved to terminals of some kind, with very few exceptions where the dinosaurs are hanging on at the top trying to stop things from going forward.

      As for the comment about cops not wearing bullet proof vests all the time? They wear them all the time, at least in Canada. They have to, it's required under the officer code of conduct. And yes, they're heavy, and bulky, and they weigh you down. But it's much better that, than some punk taking a stab at you, especially with the new ones that are puncture resistant.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Statistics by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      you're right. They should make AFIS terminals bulletproof...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    3. Re:Statistics by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Might be a good idea, except in some cases where they're bolted into the cars, and all you take is a hand terminal that's linked to it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  21. Strange re-interpretation fo a WW2 analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess no cops came back with shot up clipboards.

    http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/09/counterintuitive-world

  22. Is that Oxford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0:15 - Bridge of Sighs in Oxford, England. A city well known for its gun crime, obviously.

  23. So.... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If someone takes a shot at you, how likely is it that you'll be able to hold on to that clipboard in a position where it actually protects something? Better than just dropping the clipboard and running/diving for the nearest cover, exit or whatnot. The only way I can see you manage to keep this in a reasonable position is if you're standing still, in which case you'll look like Adam with the fig leaf because it's hardly a riot shield. What's next, a bullet proof donut box?

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next, a bullet proof donut box?

      Shit, I'd better go apply for a patent...

    2. Re:So.... by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      The idea is probably more that the cop is writing up something on the clipboard when the suspect or some other assailant pulls a gun and shoots at center mass. Since the cop is using the clip board actively it's probably already in center mass territory, intercepting the first bullet or two before the cop can respond. Since aim quickly deteriorates when firing repeatedly the first shot or two are probably the most likely to incapacitate the cop, so just improving the chance of preventing those from hitting is a good idea.

      Also, this only costs $150 and is a weight the cop is carrying around anyway to do his job. Even if it's a marginal improvement in safety, it's far better bang for your buck than $1000 in body armor sitting in a locker at the precinct.

    3. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically it comes down to this...
      If you hold it in front of your face, you get shot in your chest.
      Hold it in front of your chest, and you get a bullet in the head.

    4. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the biggest point to be had here is that the most risky time period for an officer is when he's walking up to the window of a car he's pulled over. He has 0 visibility of what he's about to walk into, and the guy in the car has already made up his mind as to if he's going to shoot or not, and if he is, he's already got his weapon ready to go - whereas the officer is not going to have weapon drawn on a routine stop. But he DOES have out his clipboard. Think also about the tactical value of it more than just "being at center of mass" or such - in the aforementioned situation, there is only a car windows size area to be shot through. The clipboard, if moved towards the window, can easily cover the majority of that area, buying the time necessary for him to draw down. The other major use I can think of, is an officer in cover could use this like a riot shield - using the handle area as an eyehole while looking out from behind cover. Would make the difference between eating a headshot or not. Plus, for what it's worth, the size is good enough that if you weren't carrying your vest and had to respond to a situation, you could easily place it inside your uniform shirt. Sure, it's not 100% coverage, but it'll cover the essential major organs, which is a hell of alot better than nothing.

    5. Re:So.... by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      If you're wearing a bullet-proof vest, the clipboard can presumably protect your head, which the vest doesn't. This way all basic vital organs will have some protection. (Well, you still have to choose between your head and "down there", depending on which you think is more important...)

    6. Re:So.... by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can get it for ANSI E (ISO A0) paper?

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    7. Re:So.... by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

      Police officers are already trained to cover their hearts with a hand in the event of a shooting. A clipboard may already be in-hand, it offers a larger surface-area, and if it catches bullets, the officer stands a better chance of surviving.

    8. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next, a bullet proof donut box?

      Okay, that reminded me of the "bulletproof pizza box" myth.

      Adam Savage: (holding 5 full pizza warmers to his chest) Ohh!! Check out my new bulletproof vest, man!

    9. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, this only costs $150

      Only? Yep that's the news story I want to read "Local precinct spends $150,000 on clipboards"

      Do we have any evidence this will save any lives? How many cops have been shot through their clipboards?

    10. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pulls a gun and shoots at center mass. Since the cop is using the clip board actively it's probably already in center mass territory

      You're such a dark, worldly character, using that "gun lingo". Wow, I hate it when desk jockeys use that term.

    11. Re:So.... by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I know a few current and former law enforcement officers. One of them talked about how a driver said to him that if he had a gun that he'd be dead by now walking up to the car like he did. He just smiled and agreed. What the driver did not know is that while his right hand was in his pocket he was holding on to a .38 special hammerless revolver. The uniform trousers at the time had a holster for the revolver sewn into the pocket. He did not even have to draw the gun but just point and shoot through the fabric. That is part of the reason why the visible revolver was a cross draw, so that it would not interfere with the operation of the concealed revolver.

      The mention of revolvers gives some indication to the age of this story and of the officer. I don't know if today's officers do the same but since I see officers carry their pistol on the strong side I doubt they do. This change might have something to do with relative the cost and effectiveness of body armor from then to now.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    12. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the idea is that the clipboard would already be in place. Surely we can look back over the last decade at police shootings and see how many included a bullet that passed through a clip board? I have real doubts that the evidence would support the case. Alternatively, how many of them passed through an area that his armour would have protected had it been worn. Add on the protection from knife and blunt implements provided by the body armour and I'm confident that getting them to wear the armour would be a lot more effective.

      If you must, spend the $140 dollars a cop on either buying lighter weight body armour or on research into producing lighter weight bodyarmour (potentially alongside military funding). I've worked in dangerous enviroments and the solution to people not liking to wear protective gear is not to swap it for an ineffective alternative.

  24. Waste of money since... by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

    not even Cat like reflex's will help you since most handgun murders are within 5 meters. So with a 9mm traveling at 335mps you have about 2msec to get the clipboard into the bullet path and here is a hint, no ones limbs can move that fast. This wont help you against a pro since they will simply pop you in the melon from behind and you will never even know it happened. But hey if it makes you sleep better at night.

    --
    Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    1. Re:Waste of money since... by jittles · · Score: 1

      So with a 9mm traveling at 335mps you have about 2msec to get the clipboard into the bullet path and here is a hint, no ones limbs can move that fast.

      What about Neo? I sure wish they would have made more than one Matrix movie...

    2. Re:Waste of money since... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2

      not even Cat like reflex's will help you since most handgun murders are within 5 meters. So with a 9mm traveling at 335mps you have about 2msec to get the clipboard into the bullet path and here is a hint, no ones limbs can move that fast. This wont help you against a pro since they will simply pop you in the melon from behind and you will never even know it happened. But hey if it makes you sleep better at night.

      True, but you figure when you're reading from a clipboard you're holding it around your center mass... which is where (A) most people aim for and (B) statistically the place you'd get shot since that's where so much of your mass is anyway.

      So if you're a cop on a call standing outside his/her squad-car reading a warrant, and some wacko decides to take a pot-shot at you from his house, there's at least a *chance* it will be in the way already..

      I'm not saying a great chance, and if you're serving a warrant you should probably wear a vest anyway.

    3. Re:Waste of money since... by Surt · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they're relying on chance, and having the clipboard already covering the area an amateur is likely to shoot at.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Waste of money since... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      I think it's more aimed at something that's naturally between you and the shooter. No ballistic armor is going to keep them safe from a trained shooter with the correct weapon for the job in the correct location. They only rate it up to shotguns no rifles or big hand guns. That desert eagle that gang bangers are so fond of is going through. As to the 2ms that's from when it's leaving the barrel it takes a good deal of time to aim and fire suspect the intention is to get this between you and the weapon it's going to cover a good deal of a car window and should make an effective shield. Granted they could just fire though there door but the guy that's shooing a cop at a traffic stop is not the brightest bulb in the bunch to start off with. Is it worth it I doubt it, but it's not that pointless.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    5. Re:Waste of money since... by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

      In a statistic I just made up (but base on personal experience with friends & family at the firing range), the average person's aim is a foot or so off at that distance, unless they're carefully aiming. I doubt protection from snipers is the target demographic, so careful aiming and being shot in the back are considerably less likely. If you're holding the clipboard at a 45 degree angle in front of you to read/write on it, they have roughly a 1:3 chance of hitting it (and about a 1:6 chance of missing you entirely), if they're aiming for your chest. Most inexperienced shooters will aim for the chest, as it's a bigger target than the head. So yeah, I'd say that a 30% risk reduction is worth it.

    6. Re:Waste of money since... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Which of these scenarios seems more likely to you: cop holding a clipboard gets shot in the back of the head by a pro, or cop holding a clipboard gets shot by a dirtbag in a vehicle during a routine traffic stop? In the likely case, the copy doesn't have to move the clipboard at all, it will already be between his chest and the shooter, greatly cutting down the available target area. And since the guy in the car is going to be moving very quickly, he is not going to be able to take the time to consider his aim.

    7. Re:Waste of money since... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I'm more worried about him capitalizing the C in "Cat like".

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    8. Re:Waste of money since... by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      not even Cat like reflex's will help you since most handgun murders are within 5 meters. So with a 9mm traveling at 335mps you have about 2msec to get the clipboard into the bullet path and here is a hint, no ones limbs can move that fast.

      You're ignoring the perp's reflexes. You don't go from 0 to trigger pulled in an instant. In the time it takes the bad guy to get his gun aimed in your direction and pull the trigger you could very well have interposed the clipboard between you and the business end of the barrel. His reflexes are no better (or worse) than yours.

      Plan A is still "get the hell out of the way" but some protection is better than near certain death.

  25. I hope that they have a decent patent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact is, that if not, Walmart, Target, or K-Mart will quickly go to China and get them to produce this. And they may still do it.

  26. Obligatory Family Guy quote by lightbox32 · · Score: 1

    "I should warn you, I have a tiny bulletproof shield, the exact size of a bullet, somewhere on my body and if you hit it, I'll be unharmed and your plan will be foiled. You'll be the laughing stock of me." Mayor Adam West, in Family Guy.

    --
    A camel is a horse created by a committee
  27. solutions for bad habits by Brigadier · · Score: 1

    I'll get blasted for this but I hate when people suggest solutions for problems which are procedural.

    " I don't like wearing my vest because it's not comfortable"
      Knee Jerk Solution: let's make a bullet proof clipboard.
    Proper Solution: Get used to it, wear it for those who love you, until we come up with a better one.

    I here this same argument with motorcycle protective gear,
    "My jacket gets too hot"
    Knee Jerk: Lets design elbow and knee pads for motorcyclists.

    1. Re:solutions for bad habits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention you see troops wearing heavier armors while deployed in higher temps. I guess if you have the option to wear a vest and you don't that is on you stop wasting money on stupid shit tho.

  28. As G Gordon Liddy said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As G. Gordon Liddy said, "Go for a head shot; they're going to be wearing bulletproof vests"

  29. multishot? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    The first shot would likely break both your wrists. Good luck holding onto it for the other 8 rounds in the clip.

    1. Re:multishot? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. The gunman's wrists will also be broken by the first shot of the hand cannon, so you don't need to worry about the other 8 rounds.

    2. Re:multishot? by Mordermi · · Score: 1

      "The gunman's wrists will also be broken"? How so?

    3. Re:multishot? by maroberts · · Score: 1

      The first shot would likely break both your wrists. Good luck holding onto it for the other 8 rounds in the clip.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezBdC6l3LRU&feature=youtu.be proves you are wrong, even if the demonstration should not really be attempted by anyone! However, it seems women were more expendable in the 1950s....

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    4. Re:multishot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. The gunman's wrists will also be broken by the first shot of the hand cannon, so you don't need to worry about the other 8 rounds.

      But decades of movies have shown me that recoil is a tiny fraction of the huge amount of momentum a bullet transfers to the target. Do you mean to tell me Newton was right?!

    5. Re:multishot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hush you, Newton's third law doesn't apply to guns.

    6. Re:multishot? by Mordermi · · Score: 1

      Nevermind. I took your post too literally and seriously. I don't agree with the parent that the holder of the clipboard will get broken wrists but I think it's very likely that the impact would knock the clipboard out of their hands if they weren't prepared and maybe even if they are.

    7. Re:multishot? by nevermore94 · · Score: 2

      And, if you are holding your clipboard at an approximate 45 degree angle while writing a ticket when someone suddenly pulls a gun on you and shoots, it will probably deflect the bullet down in a perfect angle to blow off your privates. Either way, a really bad day.

      --
      Nevermore.
  30. Physics Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't have to out move the bullet. You just need to outmove the arm and hand of the gunman. At close range you have a better ability to do this than at long range because of the angles involved. With short range the gunman needs to move his arm in a larger angle to change his target from your body to your head. At long range the gunman only needs to move a few degrees.

  31. Old News by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

    They had these 25 years ago.

  32. How many bullets are in a gun? by GoldAnt · · Score: 0

    I don't think a clipboard blocking a bullet is going to stop somebody from continuing to shoot...

  33. Habit and reflexes by Quila · · Score: 1

    If they get into the habit of bringing the clipboard up to the car they just pulled over, a natural reflex when confronted with a gun would likely be to shield themselves with whatever's in their hand -- the clipboard. So why not make it bulletproof?

    I can see this saving a few lives. Why not, unless there are other avenues where the money could save even more lives?

    On the other hand, did they test this against a standard backstop, or in a usage situation? If an officer is holding it at writing length and it's shot, will it just flip back in the officer's hand, letting the bullet continue on to hit him?

  34. I was thinking about motorcycle gear too by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    I agree with you. Each time I think about riding without my full leather pants, I ask myself, "Is today the day I want to get road rash?"

    Yes, it's hot during the summer. Yes, it means an extra few minutes removing pants, boots, etc. when I arrive at my destination. On the other hand, I get the feeling that should I ever spill, the extra time will have been well spent.

    I understand that putting on an uncomfortable, heavy, and hot vest day after day is probably terribly inconvenient. On the other hand, so is getting shot. Or maybe someone could design a better ventilated and more comfortable vest, rather than a clipboard. But unless your patrol route is behind a desk, it probably makes sense to wear the vest you're issued.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:I was thinking about motorcycle gear too by Pope · · Score: 1

      At least there's the option of perforated leather to get some air flow, or vented textiles w/armour if you'd rather go that route. Luckily there's tons of different gear for us two wheelers.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:I was thinking about motorcycle gear too by wreakyhavoc · · Score: 1

      Keep wearing that gear - you'll be glad you did if you ever go down. Even a 3 mph spill will rip through denim jeans at the knee, ditto elbows. I showed up at the cycle store on my 50cc scooter in full leather gear to buy a part for the motorcycle. Clerk smirked and said, "A little overdressed, aren't you?" This in a major metropolitan city - most dangerous place to drive. "Hurts just as bad if you get off no matter what you're riding", I said.

  35. Anti- by 0xG · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that be an "anti-ballistic" clipboard?
    A ballistic clipboard would be a weapon.

    --
    A pox on web designers who feel that window.innerWidth == screen.availWidth
    1. Re:Anti- by Mordermi · · Score: 1

      Not quite. #5

      ballistic (blstk) [Click for IPA pronunciation guide]
      —adj
      1. of or relating to ballistics
      2. denoting or relating to the flight of projectiles after power has been cut off, moving under their own momentum and the external forces of gravity and air resistance
      3. (of a measurement or measuring instrument) depending on a brief impulse or current that causes a movement related to the quantity to be measured: a ballistic pendulum
      4. informal go ballistic to become enraged or frenziedly violent
      5. (of materials) strong enough to resist damage by projectile weapons: ballistic nylon

  36. Not just those! by antdude · · Score: 0

    What about Spock and Lizard?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  37. You say office... by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

    ...do you mean the Post Office?

  38. Some leaked memos by Provocateur · · Score: 2

    Possible next-gen products depending on the success of the clipboard in the market:

    1. Stickers for the clipboard: the word SHOOT on a green background, DON'T SHOOT on red, or the alternative white diagonal slash on top of the word SHOOT, each to be stuck on the appropriate clipboards, of course.

    2. Bullet shaped pens

    3. Angry bulletproof clipboards

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:Some leaked memos by kEnder242 · · Score: 1
      --
      my associative arrays can kick your hash - TCL
  39. Re-inventing or merely gimikery and advertising??? by joeyblades · · Score: 1

    Bulletproof clipboards have been around since the 70s.
    Most law enforcement agencies gave up on them as being of limited value.

  40. Prior Art? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the Engineer units from Civilization II carried these. Can't think of any other way they could repel mechanized infantry units so effectively...

    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Prior Art? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Hey, if spearmen can defeat modern armored fighting vehicles, surely an engineer can plant a few explosives and take out the mech infantry.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  41. Obviously I didn't RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read the article, but how is this different from the item that ThinkGeek (same parent as /.) has been selling for quite some time?

  42. What about the second shot? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    The first shot from a 44 magnum knocks it out of your hand, then whatcha gunna do, Punk?

    1. Re:What about the second shot? by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      Be glad it gave you an extra second or two to react.

    2. Re:What about the second shot? by fonitrus · · Score: 1

      Never mind the 2nd shot. The force of the 1st shot will be coming to you body if you held out the clipboard to protect you in a typical fashiion pushing forward the 2 thumbs are behind the clipboard and the force of the shot is coming to you. So BULLET------->|clipboard| -------thumb...i doubt the thumbs can sustain the kinetic energy of the bullet. i think something is gonna give and it will mot likely be bone, tissue or ligament or a combination. so the pain will likely render you more helpless than if you just dropped to kneeling while pulled your own gun and shoot back. oh and once the clipboard is disloged from your grip it will most likely try to follow the direction of the bullet and come kiss you as well. my cousin does bodyguard work and he reckons by dropping to your knee while pulling your gun increases your odds of survival by a huge amount especially if you manage to get your shot off while transitioning/shooting from the hip and not waiting to get sight picture. relying on a clipboard to protect you is like fortfeiting your life to the perp.

  43. Is it really worth it? by hawguy · · Score: 2

    Is this really worth it? It covers about 25% of the front torso (and 0% of the back) assuming it's held perfectly vertical and not tipped over horizontally for reading. So there's still a 75% chance of getting shot in the torso (or a 89% chance if you include the possibility of being shot in the back).

    In comparison, a bullet proof vest gives nearly 100% coverage of the torso and back.

    If a cop is worried enough about being shot that he wants to carry this shield, why doesn't he just wear a vest and get much better protection (yes, I know a vest is heavy and uncomfortable, but getting shot is uncomfortable too)? Or carry a much bigger shield (with a notepad mount on the back) to give better protection?

    Sounds like it's just a way to get police departments to spend $150 on a clipboard instead of $4. I'm all for spending money to enhance safety, but this sounds like it's just going to provide a false sense of security and perhaps make it less likely that a cop will wear his vest since he has this clipboad.

    1. Re:Is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's a running gag in the US that cops are stupid, but I think even they will realise immediately that this offers nowhere near the protection of proper armour. I find it very unlikely that anyone would forgo real armour in favour of this clipboard. You're not supposed to rely on it as a shield, you just use it as normal and, if some drive-by dickhead decides to take a potshot at you, then your odds of survival go from (chance of the bullet hitting something important) to (chance of the bullet hitting something important) minus (small chance of clipboard happening to be in the right place at the right time). It's not going to be a big modifier, but maybe it could save one life out of a hundred, or a thousand, or ten thousand shootings. How much does it cost to bury and replace a dead cop? If it's more than the cost of equipping all cops with bulletproof clipboads*chance of clipboard saving some cop's life then it's worth it.

      I suspect the numbers don't look favourable at a $150 price point, but I can't say for sure. However I know if I were a cop in a shooty jurisdiction and my employer didn't issue these, I'd be seriously considering buying one out of my own money (maybe I could persuade the employer to subsidise it?) - when it comes to survival I'll take any tiny bit of help I can get.

      Also, one situation where this really might make a significant difference to survival rates is cops doing door-to-door inquiries in the area near a crime scene. Cop rings doorbell and waits at door, holding clipboard up against chest. If the guy who answers the door does so with a gun...

  44. Census by drwho · · Score: 1

    Appropriate for census workers. They have tons of paperwork, and often have to deal with unpleasant, suspicious, insane people.

  45. Not a new idea by Steve+Florkey · · Score: 1

    These guys use a fabric composite; that's probably more effective than the Safariland Ballistic Clipboard made of 3/8" Lexan back in the 70's. I had one. It was big and a bit awkward -- about the size of this one. And the Lexan wasn't expected to be effective against supersonic bullets like 9mm, .357 Magnum or .44 Magnum. This Kevlar sandwich should be more effective and may be a bit lighter, but it still requires another hand. How does it integrate with a flashlight? A good cop will keep his/her weapon hand free -- just in case. At night the other hand will be holding a light. If they want to make a real winner they will incorporate a good LED light with the control(s) where the left hand is holding the clipboard. The hard part will be to make the light control simple and intuitive without accidental on (or off) events. Did they do any research on the name? Did they even offer a deal for the name to Ballistic Clipboard, LLC?

  46. Back in my day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in my day we wore a suit of armor and never complained about the weight.

  47. I wonder how many.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many of these my .270 would penetrate

  48. TG already carries this by zedtwitz · · Score: 1

    Thinkgeek already carries one of these. This is no new technology. Thinkgeek's is just made of kevlar and doesn't have a handle. http://www.thinkgeek.com/interests/dads/e769/

  49. How many clipboards get hit now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming the police are using clipboards right now, the number of shootings where the bullet has passed through the cop's clipboard first will tell you how many lives this invention might save. I guess that number is close to zero.

  50. Not News by greenlead · · Score: 1

    We've had "bullet proof" clipboards on patrol for quite some time now. This is certainly nothing new.

  51. Uhhh, yes? by GrandCow · · Score: 1

    Although police officers in most countries are issued bulletproof vests, they don't necessarily wear them at all times — would you want to heave one of those things around for an entire shift?

    Unless you are retarded, yes you wear a bulletproof vest anytime it's mandated. There's a reason for it, and no you won't have a warning to put it on before it's ~*~REALLY~*~ needed. Anyone who isn't wearing it while required is putting themselves at risk and also the people who will put themselves in harms way to save them when they get hit.

    I say this as a former Marine, and I can't think of a single time that I saw my squad members or even platoon members not wearing protective gear when required. If I had though, I would have chewed them out until they put it on and even after so they didn't do it again. The same is true for local police and actually anyone in any profession that requires protective gear. If you can't be bothered to put on basic equipment, you shouldn't be there.

    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
  52. Ob. Family Guy by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    Mayor West: I should warn you, I have a tiny bullet proof shield the exact size of a bullet somewhere on my body, and if you hit it, I'll be unharmed, and your plan will be foiled. You'll be the laughing stock of me! ...

    I just had to rewatch the episode (4ACX28, Season 4 Episode 25) to find that quote!

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  53. How would this stop a bullet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that the officer would probably be unprepared to be shot at (or they would be wearing their vest) they would be unlikely to be braced for the incoming rounds. Also, consider the force most bullets strike at, does anyone really think someone is going to be able to hold an object firmly enough to really keep it from being knocked out of their hands or back into them? Even if they could, it would require both hands stopping them from reaching for their gun.

    This is a placebo solution looking for a problem. It won't solve any real problem. If it's implemented I predict it's only going to delay the officers real response time and actually cost lives due to the false sense of security it offers.

  54. Tech been around long time by cyberfringe · · Score: 1

    This kind of thing has been around a long time in the diplomatic community. I'm familiar with one company in California that provides these in various styles to governments world-wide. The briefcases carried by most high profile State Dept. employees are armored and they are taught to cover their torso with them if a shooting incident unfolds. Clipboards are a great idea. Maybe we should give them also to teachers, convenience store clerks, etc. I'll wage that some OWS protestors in Oakland and elsewhere could have used the armor too! I say armor power-ups for everyone.

    --
    There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about. -- John von Neumann
  55. iPads armored up by cyberfringe · · Score: 1

    Put the armor on the back of an iPad. Also works as an area light if turned around.

    --
    There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about. -- John von Neumann