Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Buys Moxie Marlinspike's Crypto Startup

Sparrowvsrevolution writes "Twitter has confirmed that it's acquiring Whisper Systems, the mobile encryption startup founded by hacker and security researcher Moxie Marlinspike. Marlinspike has built some of the most noteworthy tools in applied cryptography over the last few years, including the encrypted calling app Redphone, the hardened Android OS WhisperCore, and Convergence, a system for fixing the broken SSL certificate authority system. Twitter won't yet say how it plans to integrate Marlinspike or his products."

50 comments

  1. Great by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A social networking company buying a company that makes security & anonymization software, what could possibly go wrong?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Great by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh.

      Maybe between the two of them, they can find a business model.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'm pretty sure Whisper System's business model was finding some stupid, bigger company to buy it. And Twitter's business model is definitely to find a large group of stupid people to buy their IPO. So as my PHB would say, there's definitely a sort of synergy to their respective corporate strategies.

    3. Re:Great by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would have thought Google would be throwing money at him for his Android encryption stuff. It looks very good but is currently only available for a couple of phones. It would have been a fantastic advantage for getting corporate users on Android in a big way.

    4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You do realize that his work on Android detracts from the ad revenue used to support its development, right?

    5. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only some of it does. Stuff like encrypted VoiP and SMS could easily be a value-add.

    6. Re:Great by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Corporate Amerika, Bank robs YOU! :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    7. Re:Great by hardtofindanick · · Score: 1

      Same thing was said for a book seller and cloud services.

      Regarding this story though, first thing that came to my mind was occupying the space that will soon to be created by Blackberry's downfall.

    8. Re:Great by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What could possibly go wrong?

      If you're a totalitarian regime that cripples the communication of your country to beat the shit out of the populace, plenty.

      Twitter has been fucking up countries. Once you get encrypted twitter, it's going to get a lot harder to stay in charge.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    9. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would have been funny if it wasn't true. No actually, it's funny because it's true and so absurd!

    10. Re:Great by defaria · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll change the name... ;-)

    11. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter is actually one of the more useful services that have appeared, sure it is just intended as an extension of SMS but it has enabled lots of things (one being I can instantly send a photo from my phone to the webs). I aren't sure what this aquisition brings the service, but it is good to see they are adapting and planning things.

    12. Re:Great by Hentes · · Score: 4, Informative

      When information was requested about some people associated with Wikileaks they didn't just hand it over silently to the feds, and maybe increment their statistics by one later like Google. They notified the users in question ASAP, and held back the information until the final court order forced them to hand it over.

    13. Re:Great by lonecrow · · Score: 1

      Why in the world do people call twitter social networking like say a faceboook ?

      What makes Micro-bloging? or text message syndication? a "social network". No personal information need be involved, there is no friending or circles or cliques or whatever.

      Or perhaps it IS a social network and what we need is a new name for things like facebook? Like maybe "social disease"?

    14. Re:Great by ewanm89 · · Score: 2

      That and the operators don't want it, if google started including certain things by default, the operators are stupid enough to stop allowing android phones on their networks, then HTC, Samsung... stop making them and bam, no more android.

  2. I know by ManuelH · · Score: 1

    I know where their works come, his name (Awesome and cryptic)

    --
    Mother used to said If you want you find a way But mother never danced through fire shower
    1. Re:I know by DataDiddler · · Score: 2

      Cryptic? What's so cryptic about the best soda ever created?

      --
      Working...
    2. Re:I know by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      You mean the worst cold medicine ever created?

  3. Twitter has confirmed.... by cyberkahn · · Score: 1

    Twitter has confirmed it, but has Netcraft? Until Netcraft confirms it I won't believe it!

    1. Re:Twitter has confirmed.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Old meme is old?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Twitter has confirmed.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newfag is fag.

    3. Re:Twitter has confirmed.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward is Coward, and should go back to 4chan.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. Great by Hentes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Twitter is not a social network but a messaging system with an outstanding record in defending it's customers' private data.

  5. Re:Not so great by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    Yep, it's not moral, he sold out, but who can blame him? While being a security researcher is fun, doing it on a sailboat in your "free" time is funner to just about anyone. What I'm curious is which of projects is twitter after? None of them seem to really fit into what it's currently doing. I don't c a twitter android os in the future, nor do I see them doing telemarketing, so...? :)

  6. Maybe they bought exclusive rights to his name by swb · · Score: 2

    So he'll be forced to use something less grating?

    1. Re:Maybe they bought exclusive rights to his name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Heh.

  7. Re:Not so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    On moral grounds? lolwut? Fucking ungrateful freetards...

  8. Re:Not so great by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really don't agree with him selling his software to such a large corporation, on moral grounds. Will the software stay free and open?

    I realize you probably aren't trying to be hypocritical (and aren't strictly speaking), you probably just didn't realize how hypocritical this sounds. Of course you are free to "disagree" with him selling his software... but it's his, and as his, he is free to do with it as he likes. That is fundamentally a part of freedom. And, ultimately, the goal of most human productivity is to profit by it (or at least one of the goals: it doesn't have to be the only or even the main one).

    Also, it is most probable that Twitter realized their security is crap and wants tools, and / or people, who can improve that. Whisper Systems provides both. The moderately recent high-profile Twitter hacks have brought this problem to light, I cannot find fault with Twitter in trying to fix that problem. In fact, I laud them for doing so, if that is why they bought his company (and that seems extremely likely).

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  9. His projects have disappeared by Bradmont · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, all his projects seem to have disappeared from the web. Redphone is nowhere to be found on the android market, and Whispercore has a little note on his website saying, "temporarily unavailable."

    1. Re:His projects have disappeared by loftwyr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From their updates page:

      "The Transition:

      The Whisper Systems software as our users know it will live on (and we have some surprises in store that we're excited about), but there is unfortunately a transition period where we will have to temporarily take our products and services offline. RedPhone service will be interrupted immediately, but FlashBack users have a month to pull off any backup data they would like before that service also goes offline. "

  10. "Arab Spring" by bsDaemon · · Score: 2

    Possibly Twitter is buying into all the hype about how they're basically responsible for revolution and social change in the Middle East and is doing this to become further entrenched as the tool of choice for political dissidents? I'm pretty sure that's the type of business model that lands your products on trade restriction lists prettt quickly, but I can't see what else they want this for.

    1. Re:"Arab Spring" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe to give features to their users? some companies do still try to improve their products...

    2. Re:"Arab Spring" by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      ...social change in the Middle East...

      What social change? The cops are still shooting at people. And, as the old cliche goes, the 'new boss is the same as the old boss'. Individuals come and go. The system stands forever.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    3. Re:"Arab Spring" by bsDaemon · · Score: 2

      I think things are going relatively well in Tunisia at this point, if not Egypt/Syria/Yemen.

    4. Re:"Arab Spring" by makomk · · Score: 1

      Apparently this is actually harming attempts at social change in the Middle East, because people there that were previously using RedPhone to communicate have found it totally disabled without any advance warning.

  11. Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are they the Borg? "Twitter won't yet say how it plans to integrate Marlinspike"

  12. Re:Not so great by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    seconded

  13. Re:Not so great by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Also, it is most probable that Twitter realized their security is crap and wants tools, and / or people, who can improve that. Whisper Systems provides both. The moderately recent high-profile Twitter hacks have brought this problem to light, I cannot find fault with Twitter in trying to fix that problem. In fact, I laud them for doing so, if that is why they bought his company (and that seems extremely likely).

    I can find no fault with the sentiment (find a fix for our security problems) but I might find fault with their methods....
    FWIW, I find your line of reasoning quite insightful. I'm picturing the management pow-wow (called after the umpteenth "high profile" account was hacked) ending with the directive "fix it now" and someone suggesting that "That hippie dude, Moxie Something-or-other is really good with security...", and the corporate wallet was whipped out with nary a further thought.

    On the other hand..., the thought of a seriously promising fix to SSL's shortcomings now residing in those particular hands to be more than a little troubling.

  14. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "how it plans to integrate Marlinspike or his products."

    How many times can you say "resistance is futile" in a tweet?

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Trademark by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well besides the talents of Mr. Marlinspike and associates which will no doubt be useful, there is the trademark "Whisper" that Twitter is gaining.

    So in addition to Tweeting you will be able to Whisper.

  17. Re:Not so great by Calos · · Score: 1

    Please, explain how this is a moral issue, or how his actions are amoral. I'm genuinely curious to understand where you're coming from with that.

    --
    I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
  18. He is the bomb with the ladies... by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

    Did that guy come from a blaxploitation movie?

  19. Re:Not so great by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical;

    It is my belief his research and tools would have faired better without twitter intervention, Moxie's is a private security firm, twitter is a corporation. Moxie will have little say in the long term as to the direction of his projects, thereby he chose to sell out, which most people would consider amoral.

    This is equivalent to me making a website / forum kind of thing, supporting it, building the community and then selling it to google w/o care for my supporters, or users.

    Just my opinion, but you genuinely asked :)

  20. Re:Not so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why twitters got a good history with privacy, and they'd likely benefit from any fix to SSL, and the propagation of that fix.

    I think they'll be fine.

  21. Re:Not so great by emc · · Score: 1

    This is equivalent to me making a website / forum kind of thing, supporting it, building the community and then selling it to VA Linux w/o care for my supporters, or users.

    Fixed it for you...

  22. Re:Not so great by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    Well, convergence isn't actually under the whisper systems banner, so it's probably staying with Moxie.