Slashdot Mirror


ESA Ends Attempts To Pick Up Phobos-Grunt Signals

Spaceflight Now reports that hope has faded in the attempts to hear from the troubled Phobos-Grunt probe, and the listening project has been shuttered. After the craft's launch, says the article, "ESA continued trying to establish communications this week with tracking stations in Australia and the Canary Islands, but the 29,000-pound Phobos-Grunt spacecraft never responded. ... The agency's communications site in Perth, Australia, contacted Phobos-Grunt at least twice Nov. 22 and Nov. 23, but the probe has remained mysteriously silent since then." (Similar coverage also at the BBC.) See RussianSpaceWeb.com for a more detailed timeline.

40 comments

  1. Big Fucking Deal by mgabrysPDX · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Who fucking cares. Suck my cock like a Penn State locker room Slashdot.

  2. airmaxtnskosalg.com-nike air max tn kvinder sko by shoxskosalg · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    http://www.airmaxtnskosalg.com/nike-air-max-c-156.html Als de Gunners kapitein, een kleine wet heeft meer dan twee weken uit de buurt van het stadion, en net een prachtig weer om een dergelijke prestaties hebben, hoe kunnen de fans juichten. De eerste vertegenwoordiger van een kleine wet Arsenal begint, of in het 28 oktober 2003 de League Cup derde ronde wedstrijd tegen Ross,[url= http://www.airmaxtnskosalg.com/%5Djakker til kvinder[/url],[url= http://www.timberlandsalgs.com/%5Dkensington parka kvinder[/url], Graham Wing. Na zeven jaar, hij heeft ingeluid in de eerste 250 keer voor de Gunners eerste gelegenheid, is na vijf opeenvolgende tegenstanders versloeg Chelsea zelf. Gezicht heeft een "haat" van Chelsea, een kleine wet niet alleen de song en Walcott de doelstellingen helpt, waren ze nog 51 minuten,[url= http://www.shoxskosalg.com/%5Dair max tn sko[/url], scoorde een doelpunt. Naast de doelstellingen en helpt, een kleine wet te spelen 88 minuten een game-high 74 passen,[url= http://www.max90shop.com/%5Dbillig jakke[/url], het slagingspercentage van bijna 80%. 88 minuten, een kleine wet vervangen door Tomas Rosicky, Emirates Stadium, de fans stonden en applaudisseerde. Warcraft dutje Blues verloren en minder dan onoverwinnelijk jeugd, zullen 32-jarige Drogba niet oud geworden soort van gevoel? Had 13 keer tegen Arsenal, scoorde hij 13 doelpunten, de wedstrijd stuurde een vrije trap slechts assisteert laatste 10 wedstrijden, scoorde slechts twee doelpunten. Chinese fans zullen nog steeds liefkozend genoemd Drogba een "Warcraft", maar nadat de deur wordt genereus om hem afstappen. Lampard slaapwandelen, Drogba niet het doel te vinden, Terry werd een vergiet, is Chelsea is gevallen van de top van de vierde het huidige seizoen de laatste zes Premier League zonder een te winnen. Hoe Ancelotti voelen?

    1. Re:airmaxtnskosalg.com-nike air max tn kvinder sko by subreality · · Score: 1, Funny

      Gesundheit!

  3. QC vs FSB by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Still a few quality control problems. Perhaps Mr. Putin should focus on things that will help grow Russia's future rather than its war machine and faded empire. Besides, it's China that is more likely to take Siberia away from them.

    1. Re:QC vs FSB by toxygen01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      When the tests of the flight sequence finally started, the flight control system reportedly was not able to score a single clean run of its entire flight program without experiencing some sort of problems.

      http://www.russianspaceweb.com/phobos_grunt_2011.html#bku


      So onboard computer which controls the flight basically did not pass any pre-flight test. "Let's try, if it fails also in real, not only during testing..."

    2. Re:QC vs FSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "As a time-cutting measure, the spacecraft developers reportedly discussed the possibility of launching the spacecraft with only partially completed flight software. The rest of the code responsible for later phases of the mission could be uploaded into the spacecraft's memory en-route."

      Yes, that sounds like a great idea!

    3. Re:QC vs FSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "As a time-cutting measure, the spacecraft developers reportedly discussed the possibility of launching the spacecraft with only partially completed flight software. The rest of the code responsible for later phases of the mission could be uploaded into the spacecraft's memory en-route."

      Yes, that sounds like a great idea!

      Well, if it cuts cost enough to be able to afford a second try it is.

    4. Re:QC vs FSB by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is an incredibly damning report. No prototype. Minimal testing. Rewiring the steering controls (and I mean soldering and unsoldering) while the fueled craft is on the pad. Whatcouldpossiblygowrong? If that report is to be believed, hell, if half of it is to be believed, there is no way that probe would have made it there.

      One thing that really bothers me - no description of sterilizing the craft. In fact, if you're rewiring on the pad, that implies that it's not sterile (and your staff isn't particularly sane). It's fine if the Russians want to play around blowing up things around earth. It's what humans do - but it would be much better if they behaved responsibly.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:QC vs FSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Mr. Putin should focus on things that will help grow Russia's future rather than its war machine and faded empire.

      Russia seem to be doing quite well out of their space program. Roskosmos make a healthy amount of money from launching private satellites. Russia are currently the only route to the ISS, and it was Russian RD-180 engines lifting the Atlas rocket that launched the American Mars Science Laboratory last week.

    6. Re:QC vs FSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shoulda put in the bootloader

      maybe they simulated that the loose antenna
      to vibrate into place during launch

  4. in space, by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Funny

    no one can hear you grunt

    1. Re:in space, by Jacobdixon · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      no one can hear you grunt

      HiddenBrains can assist you setup and plan your ODC in India resulting in reduction in time as well as in cost. HiddenBrains has qualified and experienced consultants who can assist you set up your ODC in India. Our consultant can help you with the infrastructure selection, company registration, professionals hiring process, security & operation etc. We can help you reduce the time, cost and risks involved in setting up ODC in India.

    2. Re:in space, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Die in a fire you jingly piece of shit

    3. Re:in space, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a time-cutting measure, HiddenBrains reportedly discussed the possibility of launching the spacecraft with only partially completed flight software. The rest of the code responsible for later phases of the mission could be uploaded into the spacecraft's memory en-route.

      Anyone can Epic Fail. For Galactic Fail call HiddenBrains.

  5. Phobos is in a huff . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    Controller: ". . . Phobos . . . ? Hello, . . . Phobos . . . ? . . . "

    Phobos: No response

    Controller: " . . . Phobos . . . is it something I said . . . ? . . . "

    Phobos: No response

    Controller: "Listen, if you don't tell me what's wrong . . . I can't do anything about it . . .Phobos . . . ?"

    Phobos: No response

    Controller: "I tried to call you . . . really . . . many times . . . but you didn't answer . . . "

    Phobos: No response

    Controller: "Look, I know what you're thinking, but that Chinese Probe means nothing to me. I was just monitoring it . . . Phobos . . . ?"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Phobos is in a huff . . . by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Maybe they should let Siri try and talk to it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  6. They Named It Wrong by Froggels · · Score: -1

    It should have been called "Whimper".

  7. Refusal by United States to help? by macraig · · Score: -1, Redundant

    If what I read at the russianspaceweb,com site is true, that NASA refused (or was prohibited) to help revive this craft merely because of the presence of a Chinese component, well... that has gotta be THE most small-minded juvenile thing my government has done lately.

    1. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by toxygen01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This rumor is not true.

      Please see official answer to this from NASA:
      http://www.marstravel.org/2011/11/response-from-nasa-regarding-assistance.html

    2. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by khallow · · Score: 1

      If what I read at the russianspaceweb,com site is true, that NASA refused (or was prohibited) to help revive this craft merely because of the presence of a Chinese componen

      In NASA's defense, they probably couldn't do a thing about it and probably weren't asked to. I doubt the story is legit.

    3. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by macraig · · Score: 1

      It's good to know that's one Bad Thing my government actually hasn't done. Now if they'd just stop doing the dozens/hundreds of other Bad Things, the forecast would be truly rosy.

    4. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by macraig · · Score: 0

      It's not, read the other reply!

    5. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by khallow · · Score: 0

      I did after I posted my reply. It wasn't there when I started my post.

    6. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least were not china, or india, or thailand, or indonesia, or rwanda, or uganda, or... most places.

    7. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And next:
      Wolves accused of eating sheep!
      This rumor is not true! Please see the official answer from the lead wolf!

      I'm not saying the rumor is true. I'm saying that this is the wrong side to debunk that rumor.

      The best way to find a trustworthy statement, is to get it from the one source that hates saying it most.
      Like the Koch brothers' study showing that global warming exists.
      Or in this case, the Russians.

      Of course you still have to look out for traps, like wolves in sheep's clothing. But... you know what I mean.

    8. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has to be the lamest debunking I've ever read. For those who don't follow the link, it's basically this:

      Blog: "Hey, NASA, did you really refuse to help with the probe?"
      NASA: "Huh? The what now? Oh, no, um, 'course not. But you're asking the wrong group at NASA. You want the Mars division."
      Blog: "Oh, OK. So, Mars division, is it true you refused to help?"
      Mars division: "Huh? Oh, um, no?"
      Blog: "OK! Rumor debunked!"

      It's less a debunking and more a "NASA PR is too incompetent to bother answering your question."

      I suspect the real answer is "NASA refused to help, but not because of the Chinese probe, but because they're jingoistic assholes."

    9. Re:Refusal by United States to help? by macraig · · Score: 1

      I notice your short-list of examples conveniently excludes ALL reasonably comparable nations with similar values, lifestyles, and economies.

  8. This is a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will tell John Romeros head how to get back to Earth if they do that!

  9. Sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was in the control room here in Darmstadt when this conversation was ongoing. It's never a happy moment when you stop trying, but that's nearly 4 weeks now.

  10. This might set back Russian space programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    for another 15 years, just like Mars96 did.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_96

  11. I guess... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    ...the Leather Goddesses got it.

  12. I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    ...it's farming bitcoins.

  13. Doom by iONiUM · · Score: 2

    This sounds strangely familiar..

  14. Pretty sure this covers it by bryan1945 · · Score: 1
    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  15. Coming Down ~ Early January by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From satellite orbit data posted at http://www.n2yo.com/?s=37872 I'm estimating it will re-enter in the first few days of January. Current decay rate is 1 km per day in average altitude from an orbit that is 215 km low x 310 km high points. This will double in about 14 days as it encounters thicker atmosphere, with doubling times cut in half each 20 km of height until it hits 120 km or so on it's last orbit. Since it has a large amount of fuel in tanks not protected by heat shields, it will a unique and spectacular "rapid disassembly" whenever reentry heating causes the tanks to fail. My best guess is around 80 km altitude.

  16. New contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who can hack and re-purpose the probe before it reenters the atmosphere.

    Only one rule;

    1. The probe must escape earths gravity before reentry.

    Let the fun begin!

  17. Bummer. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    It really would be nice to see samples come back. My guess is that the next real choice will be around 2018 by America with red dragon. I would not be the least bit surprised if we send a small probe to phobos and diemos to grab samples. IDEALLY, we would grab from mars surface as well.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. Here's a real mindbender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it was never meant to reach Mars in its current form?

    Send the craft up, make sure it stops at orbit. Then make modifications to it, hook it up with new fuel. Wait for a suitable window and launch it, send it on its merry way. Survey Phobos, survey Mars. Keep the results private.

  19. My ears! My ears! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phobos-Grunt. Most cacophonous satellite name ever.

  20. Our Future in space exploration by Z0mb13M0nkey · · Score: 1

    This is why we need to re-establish our new space crafts. We had them all set up to go and then....NO!! No funding for you. It would create jobs with the manufacturing, and best of all could create revenue with other countries paying us to shoot their stuff into space. Instead we have to rely on these yahoos to shoot it up for us...We're doomed.