Slashdot Mirror
Chinese Lab Speeds Through Genome Processing With GPUs
Eric Smalley writes "The world's largest genome sequencing center once needed four days to analyze data describing a human genome. Now it needs just six hours. The trick is servers built with graphics chips — the sort of processors that were originally designed to draw images on your personal computer. They're called graphics processing units, or GPUs — a term coined by chip giant Nvidia. This fall, BGI — a mega lab headquartered in Shenzhen, China — switched to servers that use GPUs built by Nvidia, and this slashed its genome analysis time by more than an order of magnitude."
Sounds like these newfangled "GPUs" are gonna change the world.
I always wondered what GPUs are. Thanks Slashdot!
"They're called graphics processing units, or GPUs — a term coined by chip giant Nvidia. This fall, BGI — a mega lab headquartered in Shenzhen, China — switched to servers that use GPUs built by Nvidia, "
There should be something like article quality rating system on /.
Explaining what a GPU is in a slashdot summary? Come on.
This is similar to someone telling you a story about something funny happening to them while shopping at the store, pausing mid-story to inform you that a 'store' is a business where goods are displayed and exchanged for a papery substance called 'money'.
I do hope we're not going to see it on the front page every time some random chucklefuck realizes your can run code on GPUs though. No one really cares except ignorant people who haven't heard of the technology yet.
Submitter couldn't find a more technically-oriented one?
You MAY want to check this out (FPGA's have advantages too) -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=FPGA+and+GPU&go=&qs=ns&form=QBLH
* Mind you - Not EVERY kind of "problem" can have GPU's lend themselves as well to solving them too...
APK
P.S.=> Still the Field Programmable Gate Array's have merits too (especially for areas where LOW LATENCY is a mandate - such as robotics!)... apk
Fat American neckbeards use GPU's to "mine" bitcoins and keep creating bubbles that crash every few months.
It reads like some Reader's Digest piece. I can't believe timothy published it like that. :)
It's hardly news that GPUs can be used to speed up parallel tasks/computations, but even so this article is a useful reminder of two things; 1) there are still many important processes that can be sped up by using GPUs, and 2) this can be achieved pretty much anywhere in the world.
I wonder if the AMD use of more cores, whereas Nvidia uses faster cores, would change the time. I have no idea how genetic algorithms work. I do know simple hashes like bitcoins are best on AMD.
Excerpt:
At BGI, he says, they are currently able to sequence 6 trillion base pairs per day and have a stored database totaling 20 PB.
The data deluge problem stems from an imbalance between the DNA sequencing technology and computer technology. According to Dr. Wang, using second-generation sequencing machines, genomes can now be mapped 50,000 times faster than just a decade ago. The technology on track to increase approximately 10-fold every 18 months. That is 5 times the rate of Moore's Law, and therein lies the problem.
Obviously it would be impractical to upgrade one's computational infrastructure at that rate, so BGI has turned to NVIDIA GPUs to accelerate the analytics end of the workflow. The architecture of the GPU is particularly suitable for DNA data crunching, thanks to its many simple cores and its high memory bandwidth.
This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
I get that programmers are offloading certain tasks to the GPU because they are able to perform specific tasks faster, but why is this even necessary. If the GPUs are so good at it then why can't there be a dedicated part of the CPU to perform these same computations in parallel streams the same way the GPU does?
SIMD chips will always show computational gains to any class of problem that makes significant use of matrix multiplication or linear algebra. So graphics, crypto, etc..
What word rhymes with buried alive?
So, a site dedicated to nerds needs to explain what a GPU is? Are we not nerds anymore?
Write boring code, not shiny code!
Or ignorant people who've heard of it, but don't know quite what it stands for. This summary helpfully explains!
Yeah, Wired, what gives?
(Hint: the summary is a direct quote from the enterprise-y TFA.)
Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
And other assorted distro-computing tasks. Hell, my old x1800's stopped being supported for the current Folding software years ago.
A nice list of distro computing projects.
Another nice list of such projects.
Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
See title.
Who cares? We've known about GPU powered supercomputers for years. The Chinese just bought cards from nvidia and made a supercomputer. Any university in the world can build one.
...will it run crysis?
Genomic analysis involves extensive use of recursive techniques, which are well suited to parallel processing and combinatoric problems. GPU's are small independent components originally designed to handle large matrices of pixel elements for video programming very quickly for video display and refresh. Thus, they can when suitably programmed, for example using CUDA, in parallel to compute solutions required to map problems of high combinatoric dimensionality onto a one dimensional space (sequence) very quickly compared to a CPU that would require serial computation on an extremely large combinatoric space. Effectively, it puts massive supercomputers in the petabyte and exabye processing speeds to be built with standard components at modest prices.
The amazing thing about this technology and the responses of the supposedly technologically sophisticated responses on a site such as slashdot, is that the Chinese are picking up on the technology and on genomic data mining far faster and with more intensity than is the broader US tech community. Given the size of their brainpower base and the rate at which they are adapting the technology the Chinese are well on their way to dominating the drug development and physiological/functional genomic sciences in the next 10 years. The race will largely be over before most American tech types even know it happened.
The even more amazing thing is the potential of unlocking the genetics which control human intelligence, memory and learning capacity. Once these are patented and developed for a host of applications all other forms technology will become increasingly inconsequential. While the US is putting its most powerful computers to use cracking into and reading people's email, the Chinese have a more ambitious agenda.
Actually, this is a good thing, since the Chinese are far more cognizant of the dangers posed by imminent global warming due to carbon dioxide pollution to their economy and the the stability of their political system. If you have any doubts about the Chinese propensity to use their wits, I suggest you see the movie Red Cliff, which very dramatically displays the remarkable triumph of wits over shear military superiority. Its based on a true story.
Is there a name for what you did? I mean replying to an irrelevant FP with the same comment an AC without the benefit of karma made nearly an hour earlier. Seems low, somehow.
"GPUs . . . ? . . . I was informed that this project was powered by GNUs . . . ?"
". . . now where is that Apple MAC chip that generates the GPL number that allows the PC to connect to the Internet . . . ?"
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
I hate to say it, but I tend to be a bit skeptical about any research news coming out of China, since so much of it has been falsified in the past few years. So until some Chinese researcher shows me a six-assed monkey, my response to this news is going to be "Meh."
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
Although at least in my field the problem is that no one ever thought to set lower limits on the quality of what you can call a genome. So now we get "genomes" made up of 100,000 contigs (many only a couple of hundred base pairs long) and even counting all of those, the total sequence might account for only 70% of the total size of the genome. But it's still a "genome" paper, which is still an instant ticket to Nature Genetics (or Nature Biotechnology if the assembly is REALLY bad).
BGI is certainly one of the biggest offenders (Cucumber and Pigeonpea are both examples of the sort of terrible genomes-in-name-only BGI puts out) but I think the real problem is that Illumina sequence data is so cheap people keep trying to use it to sequence genomes, thinking if they throw enough raw data and enough mate-pair libraries at the problem it'll eventually make up for the fact that Illumina reads are so short. Illumina data is great for a lot of things. Calling SNPs, measuring gene expression, studying methylation patterns.
But, at least for any genome significant transposon content, it simply does not work.
Just thing how cool it will be to have cards that can do this on the CPU BUS.
Just think of a Beowulf cluster of these things would...
oh wait. Sorry.
... this is what a Chinese lab looks like.
Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
According to Jackson Lab’s TeHennepe, the feat BGI and NVIDIA pulled off was porting key genome analysis tools to NVIDIA’s GPU architecture, a nontrivial accomplishment that the open source community and others have been working toward.
Can anyone familiar with current efforts shed more light on this? Who is working on open source bioinformatics and how much work has been done?
========== "Hello World" in my programming language of choice: ATG - LET THERE BE LIFE - TAG ==========
No we are D-e-V-o
My first thought as well.
Back in the early to mid 80s (prior to 85) the term GPU was already in use for Graphics Processing Unit.
Of course there was also CPU for Central Processing Unit, SPU for Sound Processing Unit, and also MPU for Math Processing Unit.
I have no idea how they got a generic term that had been around for at least 20 years trademarked or copyrighted, but they did. I guess someone really wanted a blowjob bad or something.
If you want proof, just dig up a lot of magazines from those days, including the platform specific ones for Atari and Commodore.
No, I may be an old time geek, but my copies of those magazines didn't survive multiple moves.
I actually decided to stay out of this one, & see what develops, so have fun!
APK
APK
:)
* :)
:) LMAO @ U WALLY... lol!
Make us laugh and change ur username to waldo, lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW7fZ0etra0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW7fZ0etra0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW7fZ0etra0
Make us laugh & change ur username to waldo, lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW7fZ0etra0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW7fZ0etra0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW7fZ0etra0
"The world's largest genome sequencing center once needed four days to analyze data describing a human genome. Now it needs just six hours. The trick is servers built with...GPUs — a term coined by chip giant Nvidia. This fall, BGI — a mega lab headquartered in Shenzhen, China — switched to servers that use GPUs built by Nvidia, and this slashed its genome analysis time by more than an order of magnitude."
Quit projecting
waldo_134, waldo_392, waldo_216, waldo_49, waldo_666
Q. Where's waldo?
A: Who cares?
MK went to school to get a sheepskin, then dropped out when found out it was only a "figure of speech" for a diploma. BAAAAAHHHH!
feeb!
MichaelKristopeit500 or APK? Changin quote content too?
U AC post now n' MichaelKristopeit500's last one I saw here http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38634706
MK proves it replying ac n' MichaelKristopeit500's last seen-> http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38634706
Except that genomics has as of yet proven minimally useful for drug development. Until they actually develop significant amounts of homegrown technology (which, to be fair, they are actually doing in the bioinformatics arena, as opposed to sequencing), I'm not convinced that they're that much of a threat.
What if they simply avoid competing by patenting the sequence for Caucasians and then pulling an Apple and suing us out of existence? ;^)
Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
First, I didn't read the AC's comment. Then I thought the FP in question was pretty relevant to the quality of the summary. Not a troll in my view and I explained why.
Of course, it depends your point of view I guess. My post was probably badly worded.
Write boring code, not shiny code!
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38634584
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38634584
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW7fZ0etra0
"i have on multiple occasions formally accused you of federal felony copyright violations and conspiracy to commit murder. you're an ignorant hypocrite. you stole my photographs and redistributed them unaltered with a call for my murder attached. you are most certainly a felon. JUSTICE IS COMING. your ".40" that you claim you'll be waiting with will not be as effective as it is in your psychotic dreams. cower some more, feeb. you're completely pathetic." - by MichaelKristopeit347 (1968128) on Thursday January 06 2011, @01:16AM (#34773824)
from - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1929880&cid=34773824
or
"APK, I'm considering going to the police. Those allegations are libelous and I suggest you back off." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday January 06 2011, @05:52PM (#34784134) Journal
from - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1932474&cid=34784134
Where clone53421 http://slashdot.org/~clone53421 was caught stealing from MichealKristopeit and was caught also using clone52431 http://slashdot.org/~clone52431 his OTHER "alternate registered 'luser'" name here for trolling.
Neither clone guise has been seen since APK ran them out of slashdot.
It looks like a new tech nation is getting more and more press here with their tech sector blossoming right under our eyes.
Chinese are constantly building up and improving their educational system. I heard they are de facto building up, from scratch, a few of US-style universities and hiring world's academic talent on about similar terms as in the US (however with a huge difference in living costs). It's smart to go there now (as a bet for the future) as these could become renowned in a decade or so if they succeed in attracting enough of talent.
Imagine if the calculus were processed in a FPGA, it would be another magnitude faster :P
clone53421 (1805862) 1st replies -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1928730&cid=34700970
Then he's caught switching to clone52431 (1310749)
In response to lgw in his subsequent reply in the same thread -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1928730&cid=34702996
Busted clone, busted. Using multiple registered accounts on /. = lame & reprehensible on your part.
i should really get a life.
Yes, you should (I see that you "ran out of gas" last night, lol, & you must have made yet MORE of your "alternate registered 'luser' guises too).
What's a nerd?
See subject-line above - because you've been LIBELLING ME HERE, rampantly, & pursuing me thru 3 diff. exchanges I was having with others (go for it):
First of all - Tell us if YOU, or Thor Schmuck (your "credible reliable reputable source" etc. (not)), actually possess degrees around the art & science of computing (or any really, I am curious on this account).
This is to see if you are this "expert" you seem to THINK you are. I already KNOW you haven't done anything of good note int his field in written respected publications, so that much is taken care of in that regard.
Ask your "Credible Source", Thor Schmuck, if he also lists PING.EXE (because it can or could do a PING OF DEATH), or if he lists SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY on his list (because it alters the HOSTS file, & CA says "that's bad", but, funny they don't list Spybot S&D either, eh?)
I mean, lol, look @ your "legal expertise" here (quoting you):
----
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1607692&cid=31743626 [slashdot.org]
"cower in my shadow some more, feeb." - by MichaelKristopeit330 (1963782) on 2012-01-09 10:19
Oh, really? Care to show me a legal precedent OR ruling of that being the case, were I switching IP addresses to overcome the "10 posts per 24 hour limit" on AC users? I sign off as APK, so I am NOT "misrepresenting myself" here, in case you hadn't noticed, lol!
(Now, on "changing IP addy"? Uhm, who says I am doing THAT anyhow to beat the restriction - and so what IF I did? I could just as easily say I turned off my modem & PC, & upon restarting it?? I have a new IP address... pretty simple - I'd like to see you backup that b.s., with legal evidence to what you said, because, anyone can turn off their modem & upon restarting be assigned a new IP address, assuming they don't have a STATIC IP!)
Produce some US legal documentation of what you just said... thanks! I, for one, would like to see it - because it appaernty wouldn't account for folks that keep their power off when not using a system... so, show us your LEGAL proof of what you stated now above, ok?
NOW - You show me that, all of it, dated before you said this? I'll be glad to abide by it!
Additionally, so you know?
Well - Despite your calling me a malware maker & what not? I have written the most comprehensive security guide there is online, current version built in late 2007, as my New Year's Resolution of "do the right thing" & pay it forward... (&, the FIRST SECURITY GUIDE FOR WINDOWS afaik, back in 1997 @ NTCompatible.com for Windows NT-based systems... so, so much for your libelling me calling me a malware maker!) & it's gone well over 350,000++ views, to good review, testimonials of its efficacy, being made an "ESSENTIAL GUIDE" or "STICKY THREAD" (even MOST VIEWED or top 10 usually) on 15/20 forums its featured on, & more!
PROOFS/EXAMPLES OF ITS EFFICACY? Ok:
----
HOW TO SECURE Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003, & even VISTA/Windows 7 (+ make it "fun-to-do" via CIS Tool Guidance & beyond):
http://www.tcmagazine.com/forums/index.php?s=568d95985ad83ef4add94de09f6026d3&showtopic=2662 [tcmagazine.com]
----
It works, & is based on the concept of what many computer security folks the past few years have been calling "LAYERED SECURITY"...
----
http://www.xtremepccentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=672ebdf47af75a0c5b0d9e7278be305f&t=28430&page=2 [xtremepccentral.com]
"I recently, months ago when you finally got this guide done, had authorization to try this on simple work station for kids. My client, who paid me an ungodly amount of money to do this
Posting & editing in/out things or altering what I said in the past AC troll? Please...
Why don't YOU point us to an ACTUAL URL where I said things then, instead of just quotes, hmmm?
Because YOU DON'T DARE, because it'll show differently as to who said what, case in point is the link next!
(IF I even SAID what you posted that is, I don't even READ it because you put Mike's name into posts I may or may NOT have said here earlier -> http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38634646 )
LOW!
Especially how you put in MichealKristopeit into things I said long ago here (or not, you probably altered my old posts' content in doing so too).
APK
P.S.=> This "by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 09, @02:54PM (#38640930)" worm? Not worth bothering with... he's FAR worse than MichealK is (I at least give MikeK credit for having the balls to post as he, & you impersonated MichealKristopeit TOO here apparently -> http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38638754 )... apk
Attempted impersonating me in this exchange here http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38634646
and here also
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38640930
(I can show TONS of others times the AC "stalker troll" as I call him has tried to impersonate me & I caught it, posting right after as you are NOW, that it was NOT I!)
APK
P.S.=> See mike, this is the "why" of WHY I posted what I did to you here in my 1st reply to you -> http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38632150 & in its "Point #1" enumerated there, specifically...
Folks here on /. DO give you a lot of shit, as they do myself, but I never tried to with you & I have "stuck up" for you before in fact because of it!
(That is, until you do with me, FIRST, as you did here: attacking me for NO reason I can tell in fact... & you have done that here mind you - I only defend myself's all!)...
... apk
WoW - so you DO speak! Heh - I thought all you EVER said was the "cower feeb" etc. stuff you kept repeating, lol...
* I dunno Mike - I've actually TRIED to be nice to you, but it doesn't work, oh well...
( & this time per my last post? It wasn't a "1st" for you attacking me when I was actually being nice! OH well!)
APK
P.S.=>
"so, by your ignorant logic, if someone responds to you in a timely fashion, and then i respond to you in a timely fashion, then i must be that someone. you're dumber than i thought. if you believe you're being attacked, you're even dumber than that... but considering i merely responded to your idiocy with a statement of fact concerning it's idiotic content, it's already clear you're an idiot and an ignorant hypocrite."" -
No different than YOU immediately 'attacking me' now, OR, when I posted to you here!
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38633970
(Because I largely DID stay out of this one, just to see "what develops" & they're impersonating yourself & myself, trying to "play us" - no thanks to THAT much, here @ least)
... apk
The explanation isn't even correct. When I wrote a Super Nintendo emulator in the 90s, various documents referred to its GPU as a, er, GPU. The SNES predates NVidia itself, so let's not call it a "term coined by chip giant NVidia".
GPUs are nowhere near new. What's relatively new is GPGPUs (General-Purpose computation on Graphics Processing Units).
Yup, there's NO reasoning with you... oh well!
APK
P.S.=> Now? Well, now, I can see why folks like to "rib on you" - you really DO "bring it upon yourself" man!
(Then again? Well... That's also JUST assuming on my part, that you're just not someone's stupid alternate registered 'luser' experiment here, lol, seeing how many of those they can use to troll others with etc./et al! Wouldn't surprise me @ all on that account, with some of the "shenanigans" these kids *think* is "clever" to try pull etc.)
E.G.-> Yes, I've caught clone52431/clone53421 doing it, you know THAT much ( & also others like TomHudson & the "trolltalk.com" crew cheating the mod system here too)... apk
you're worthless.
you're worthless.
you're worthless.
you are NOTHING
Paid in full & taxes up to date. How about you MichaelKristopeit? Somehow, I doubt it.
Paid in full & taxes up to date. How about you MichaelKristopeit? Somehow, I doubt it...
Paid in full & taxes up to date. How about you MichaelKristopeit? Somehow, I doubt it!
Paid in full & taxes up to date. How about you MichaelKristopeit? Somehow, I doubt it....
Paid for in full, & taxes up to date also. How about you? Somehow, I doubt you do.
Paid up in full & taxes current. How about you? Somehow, I doubt you do.
Paid up in full, & taxes current too. How about you? Somehow, I doubt you do.
We've all known for a while now that GPU's are far more powerful than CPU's - nothing new.
Now, I'd love to see what Intel (or any of the major chip manufacturers for that matter) could produce if they were not limited by the backward compatibility issue! If they could simply sit down and design a new CPU from scratch with no "limits" to the design - with all that the manufacturers have learned over the decades, such a new CPU would be one hell of a beast!
Do you have a degree in CSC or CIS MichaelKristopeit497? No?? We thought not. You're by no means an expert to comment on anything in the art and sciences of computing then!
MichaelKristopeit497 the no CSC or CIS "degreeless expert" who talks a lot, but when it comes to showing proof he's ever done anything in the way of computer programs that were rated well by others, he strangely has to 'take the 5th', lmao. Do you think you're fooling anyone, talker? Answer = no. MichaelKristopeit497 you're just another done nothing with his life slashdot dime-a-dozen wannabe expert with no degrees or visible provable accomplishments, period, lol!
Why do you avoid the simple questions asking you to tell us if you have a CSC or CIS degree, or proof that you've actually written computer programs (not just websites, I know 6 yr. olds that can do that much after all) that did well in international contests like Microsoft's Tech Ed or that were rated well by others in the art and science of computing then, since your comments "stand on their own"? Because all you have is your bullshit talk, and no degrees in the computer sciences, lmao. You're just another slashdot pseudo expert talker and a ne'er do well.
MichaelKristopei330sure talks a lot, until you ask him if he has a degree in computer sciences and also when you ask him to prove existence of programs he says he has written, lol, but we all know he does not actually have or done for anyone (let alone have them rated well):
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1640368&cid=32096038 [slashdot.org]
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1640368&cid=32096066 [slashdot.org]
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1640368&cid=32096094 [slashdot.org]
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1640368&cid=32096232 [slashdot.org]
Sure a lot of mod downs though, so keep blowing your mod point, "Sir Talk A Lot" (LMAO). You're doing a wonderful job of showing everyone here just how "expert" (not) you are in computers, you ne'er do well MichaelKristopei330.
Now we know who the AC stalker trolls are, n' it's squiggledouche, tomhudson (fat ass), and clone! Holding a grudge for over a year and a half there, squiggledouche, clone, or tomhudson (the diabetic wreck)? Pitiful. What was said in the links about you that you posted must have really hit home. I saw that APK also swept the floor with clone, tomhudson, n squiggledouche so badly that they're stalking him to this very day, surreptitiously, via ac posts.
Did you know, that Jeremy Reimer (of you OSY site there @ pegasus3d.com no less) admitted to impersonating me on his website? Right here:
http://www.windowsitpro.com/articles/index.cfm?art icleid=41095&cpage=124 [windowsitpro.com]
--------------
"Anyway the "APK" registered here is just an affectionate clone of the original. In fact I prefer him to the original." - Jeremy Reimer - March 25, 2005
--------------
That's right. See for yourself there, it's plain-jane quotes of his own words (my favorite tactic along with facts)...
Sad!
Read on, that part about him ONLY gets better as we go... This is so others can consider the source & all that... it's arstechnica/osy hilarity, @ its finest! I posted that earlier here anyhow, your ADD mental problems must have prohibited you from recalling it, right?
Well there tis again for your reference!
Plus, all that, in ADDition to his ISP busting him for email harassing me as well... he's touched! Remind YOU of anyone, hehe?
It's ALL there on that page url above anyways.
E.G. -> Some weird stuff, almost as bad as your 'secret admirer' internet weirdo psycho stalker profile you keep of ME on YOUR site... that's creepy stuff man, honestly! I hope you realize that... this from YOUR site, about me:
http://paperlined.org/apps/slashdot/anonymous_APK [paperlined.org] [paperlined.org]
lol! Flaky stuff imo, & as I noted above? Way, way off about me on many accounts!
Some of which like saying I have narcissistic something or other, and you admitting your fruity in the brain with ADD? Hell, that's funny man, it TRULY is!
Jeremy Reimer also wrote childish libellous songs about me, & more too (like edited photos etc.)... & the strange part, the really weird part??
The guy's 33 years of age - the "sheer maturity" of Arstechnica/OSY forums people, lol, eh?
Like I said, it's up there @ that URL!
Ah, anyhow:
Oh & Yea - My job's just fine. I like it! Forensics stuff, & data security etc. in nature MOSTLY...
PLUS, There is no "making up lawyers" in my world, not @ all. I keep one on retainer in fact, it's worth it just in case etc. & for GOOD reasons!
(This is because I enter into contracts & early on a decade or so ago? Well, I got burned once pretty bad, being told I would get one wage, & then being paid, lol (got suckered) minimum wage one time because my headhunter burnt me, I never signed off a contract with him (written one, all verbal)).
Shit like that, lol, (I can laugh about it now, my bad, it was 10 years back now)? Teaches you lessons!
I do have work though, pretty cool job (not coding as much as I would like to be doing) but more "forensics" in nature, & for a HUGE financial firm (which shall remain nameless, I don't give out that kind of info., not until job is done/thru etc. @ least). :)
* Risk mgt./Anonymity & all that... unlike your posting your personal weirdness about me here (which is WAY off base stuff... flaky actually, but coming from you, after I know now you do have mental issues & probably are on somekind of meds (are you?)) here in my P.S. below & the other paperlined.org url about me above... lol, Well, man... I dunno about you! Again - "Dr. Arkham Asylum" would be a GOOD nickname/handle for you imo, lol!
(Especially with YOUR trying to 'diagnose me' medically on your page url up there on your site, lol... that's CERTAINLY rich! Pot calling the kettle black? Oh, lol, hell yea, absolutely!)
I would like to see your PhD in Psychiatry &/or Psychology first though, might lend credence to your bottom-line @ that URL above about me on your site, lol!
* :)
(And, again - if you don't like what I write? Heck, again - ADD & all on your end, so I have to repeat it so it becomes a routine you
subject says it all.
Gave urself away as the ac stalker troll scumbag -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610194&cid=38641004
OK, here goes, you're no longer going to get the "mentally challenged treatment kid gloves" from me, anymore.
"you think it's proper to call me Sir? that is very telling."by MichaelKristopeit409 (2018828) on Tuesday January 10, @07:14PM
So is my penis, ok? LOL, Whatever... I hope THAT is not another of your shortcomings, in being homosexual, because that's ALL I need right now, some nutjob who has THAT problem... & being gay? It's FAR from normal, no questions asked!
Above all: What you write, especially coming from YOU?
That IS TRULY hilarious!
I mean - dude, you're a nutjob (admitted one in interiot no less who knows he's not right in the head)!
One doing the judging of others who aren't 'touched' as he is? Especially about something HE PERSONALLY has issues with due to his "delicate mental condition", no less??
That's rich! OMG...
With YOU being the one having the problems mentally, and apparently ashamed of it, simply because of me posting evidences of your starting things with me here, FIRST?
(Care to deny that? Answer that question...)
No "I have ADD (b.s. crap imo) & did not see it" type avoidance of it either, ok?
Answer THAT question -> Did you, or did you not, startup with me here??
Also - I suppose YOU have elected yourself as "the spokesman for SLASHDOT" & are now 'president of the standards bureau for posting' & how to structure grammar & spelling, here, right???
New news everyone:
'Heck, must be MichaelK is KING of slashdot'
( How I should write/post, man... got 1 thing to say to you, OK mental boy?? Again - drink in & digest this:
You don't like what I write here? Don't read it! (Simple, but apparently NOT for a mentally challenged nutcase like you!)
So, instead of CONTINUALLY hassling me, nutjob? Get a life!
That is what the MAIN point is, here - you're NOT right in the head, you admit it, and then put up b.s. about me (keeping your weirdo profile of me on your site no less, that's sick freak)?
Then, lol, hilariously trying to 'diagnose me' here:
http://paperlined.org/apps/slashdot/anonymous_APK. html
With some condition, & it turns up YOU are the one 'touched in the skull' (with a hammer most likely)??
OMG, the "pot calling the kettle black" shit, ROTFLMAO!
Yes, now there is NO doubt of it - You have mental issues...
You DEFINITELY are not "normal". LOL, I love the "10% of boys have ADD" bullcrap - the 'misery loves company' I am part of the 'team' & 'jump on the bandwagon' shit... Especially after I tried to be understanding of it? You had this coming.
SO, that's it: The "kid gloves" with you? They're just dead-up off!
You mistake my being nice, trying to understand I was dealing with a mentally challenged person in you, for weakness. Newsflash BOY - it's not, & that is done now. You truly are one F-d up human being - a miserable one, that likes to try to bring THAT problem of your being a human wreck, onto others. THAT's in addition to obviously being somekind of a genetic error - a mental aberration.
Hey again - Don't LIKE that?
Then, take my advice - quit hassling me & reading my postings here if you don't like them... right??
Point-blank:
You're being f'd up brain doesn't allow you to concentrate longer than 5 seconds to write a posting, or read one that is longer than 2 sentences fully apparently! OR, allow you to remember promises & statements you make also, like saying you'd cut the crap with me, here:
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157615&thre shold=1&commentsort=0&tid=95&mode=thread&pid=13224 172#13225084
I mean, lol, WHY ELSE THEN, DID YOU STARTUP WITH ME (
APK caught squiggleslash stalking him by ac posts here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610194&cid=38641004
MichaelKristopeit lost badly to apk. Very badly.
i am michael kristopeit. i have 1 face.
Either that's one ugly face or you've been sucking arse, because it looks like there's a bum stuck to it.
LMAO -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrUGYT_gl9I = MikeK, lol...
APK
P.S.=> How many accounts is that you're up to now? Well, lol, let's see: I said 500 on a guess, & MichaelKristopeit412 looks like your 412th, lmao... I was wrong, but (rotflmao)... who cares?? Why??
Well - You're the "Man..." (See song above, lol, same quality as you, lol).. /quote)... apk
Troll fight! Humongous host file vs. pig fucker.
The only possible winner is - everybody else.
Saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit", you have been warned... apk
This site's legal dept.'s been informed on his saying I was raped (false) & MichaelKristopeit's libeling myself http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> "MichaelKristopeit"'s going away pretty soon IF I can help it along with this site's owners/mgt./legal etc./et al... apk
You saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit", you have been warned... apk
You saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit", you have been warned... apk
You saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit", you have been warned... apk
You saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit", you have been warned... apk
You saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit", you have been warned...
APK
P.S.=> Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful...
... apk
Saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit" - time to get rid of you once & for all... apk
Saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit" - time to get rid of you once & for all... apk
Saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit" - time to get rid of you once & for all... apk
Saying I was raped=false & is libeling myself on your part http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116
APK
P.S.=> You're going to regret that "MichaelKristopeit" - time to get rid of you once & for all... apk
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
With you saying I was raped MichaelKristopeit (or whoever you are) here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 .
APK
With you saying I was raped MichaelKristopeit (or whoever you are) here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 .
APK
In your saying I was raped MichaelKristopeit (or whoever you are) here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 .
APK
In you saying I was raped MichaelKristopeit (or whoever you are) here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 .
APK
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2254:hidden-start-run-apps-in-the-background&catid=70:64bit-process-management&Itemid=136
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
http://www.updatapartners.com/news/151/Updata-Partners-to-Acquire-CA-Technologies-Internet-Security-Business-Unit-/
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2254:hidden-start-run-apps-in-the-background&catid=70:64bit-process-management&Itemid=136
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
http://www.updatapartners.com/news/151/Updata-Partners-to-Acquire-CA-Technologies-Internet-Security-Business-Unit-/
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2254:hidden-start-run-apps-in-the-background&catid=70:64bit-process-management&Itemid=136
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
http://www.updatapartners.com/news/151/Updata-Partners-to-Acquire-CA-Technologies-Internet-Security-Business-Unit-/
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2254:hidden-start-run-apps-in-the-background&catid=70:64bit-process-management&Itemid=136
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
http://www.updatapartners.com/news/151/Updata-Partners-to-Acquire-CA-Technologies-Internet-Security-Business-Unit-/
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
See subject-line. Whatever happens, you only caused it for yourself.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
you're an ignorant hypocrite.
having sex without consent is being a party to rape. you claimed, in quotes, that it was your "job"... who said it was your job? are you a registered sex worker? did you have a pimp? either you consented, and stated your desire to engage in wanted sexual contact, and later lied about it; or you were raped. are you a liar?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
did jay little regret you claiming that he libeled you? you said that he would too, but it seems his website is still up after many years, and no action was ever taken..., as well as many other individuals who you've threatened with libel suits that resulted in no action. you're a demonstrated liar. you're a moronic buffoon. you are completely worthless.
searching for "Alexander Peter Kowalski" on google responds with the top result "How to Respond When People Threaten to Sue You on the Web"... full of people mocking your pathetic attempts to invoke legal action where none is warranted. why do you think that is?
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2254:hidden-start-run-apps-in-the-background&catid=70:64bit-process-management&Itemid=136
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
http://www.updatapartners.com/news/151/Updata-Partners-to-Acquire-CA-Technologies-Internet-Security-Business-Unit-/
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
You'll probably end up worse than that.
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38709702 by clone53421 (1310749) on Sunday January 15, @08:16PM (#38709702) Journal
and
"trolllolllollloll" - by clone52431 (1805862) on Sunday January 15, @08:28PM (#38709762)
* There you are... you proved my point for me, that clone53421 = clone52431...
(Appears that I was dead-on correct about you being the same person using multiple accounts for harassing/stalking others on /. )
APK
P.S.=> It is difficult to believe that there are nutjobs like yourself that literally seem to "get off" on harassing/stalking others (call it "trolling" if you wish, but it amounts to nothing more than stalking/harassing)...
... apk
Oh, that reply's SO "clever" & original (not). You always that clever? Thanks for admitting you're one & the same (clone52431 = clone53421), just as I suspected.
* See my subject-line above...
APK
P.S.=> It would suck to be you, or even LIKE you. You're admission of being of "MichaelKristopeit class" (lowest troll types of all are multiple registered account ones like yourself & he)... Doing what you do shows You have no integrity, no honesty, and certainly NO CLASS (because you're a multiple registered 'luser' account troll)...
... apk
It may be that the reason for APK's existence is to serve as a warning to others.
Ever done anything bad, completely unintentionally? Alexander Peter Kowalski fits the bill. He's the author of a tool, apkapp2backgrounddaemonprocessengine, considered malware by a large number of anti-malware companies and organizations. He probably wrote it in good faith, but the reality is that it's a product that can be used easily and effectively to hide spyware on a computer. So many anti-malware organizations have flagged it as majorly dangerous.
CA
PestPatrol
SpywareDB ("Dangerous!")
Freedom Anti-Spyware
Spycheck (Spanish-language) - "Recomendacion: DESACTIVAR Y ELIMINAR"
Spyware No-More ("Threat risk: High risk", "Advice: Remove This is a very high risk threat and should be removed immediately as to prevent harm to your computer and / or to protect your privacy")
To add insult to injury, Kowalski doesn't handle criticism maturely. See here for an example of Kowalski going about dealing with negative material on the Internets in entirely the wrong way.
So if you read material by APK, just remember that while he apparently has a lot of degrees in computer something or other, he's not terribly smart when it comes to the whole forward thinking thing.
It may be that the reason for APK's existence is to serve as a warning to others.
Ever done anything bad, completely unintentionally? Alexander Peter Kowalski fits the bill. He's the author of a tool, apkapp2backgrounddaemonprocessengine, considered malware by a large number of anti-malware companies and organizations. He probably wrote it in good faith, but the reality is that it's a product that can be used easily and effectively to hide spyware on a computer. So many anti-malware organizations have flagged it as majorly dangerous.
CA
PestPatrol
SpywareDB ("Dangerous!")
Freedom Anti-Spyware
Spycheck (Spanish-language) - "Recomendacion: DESACTIVAR Y ELIMINAR"
Spyware No-More ("Threat risk: High risk", "Advice: Remove This is a very high risk threat and should be removed immediately as to prevent harm to your computer and / or to protect your privacy")
To add insult to injury, Kowalski doesn't handle criticism maturely. See here for an example of Kowalski going about dealing with negative material on the Internets in entirely the wrong way.
So if you read material by APK, just remember that while he apparently has a lot of degrees in computer something or other, he's not terribly smart when it comes to the whole forward thinking thing.
My single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2254:hidden-start-run-apps-in-the-background&catid=70:64bit-process-management&Itemid=136
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
http://www.updatapartners.com/news/151/Updata-Partners-to-Acquire-CA-Technologies-Internet-Security-Business-Unit-/
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
In fact, Dr. Mark Russinovich &/or Nir Softer of NIRSOFT have had this happen to their applications too (pstools & others M.R. wrote, & many Nir Sofer wrote - but they are "double edged swords" tools, just like ping is!) Write either of them, they won't & DON'T deny it (and they don't like it, neither do I).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit!
APK
P.S.=> There's also a pack of trolls here, literally ADMITTED trolls, they run a domain called "trolltalk.com" in fact!
In THIS case, ac trolling me? Pay attention to "C" below, on gmhowell - he's stalking me via AC trolling posts!
(gmhowell, tomhudson, webmistressrachel, squiggleslash, ountertrolling, mcgrew, & other registered LUSER 'guises'),
They regularly cheat/game the moderation system, literally, in 2 ways:
---
1.) Modding themselves up in collusion/teams
2.) Modding down those they are stalking/harassing/trolling
---
Think it's bullshit? Ok, fine - here's where they LITERALLLY ADMIT TO ALL OF THE ABOVE & how they cheat the mod system here:
---
A.) countertrolling telling others how to moddown opponents as registered lusers 1st, then to logout to save your karma/cookie state of your reg'd luser account, & then to troll others via ac replies ->
My single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2254:hidden-start-run-apps-in-the-background&catid=70:64bit-process-management&Itemid=136
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
http://www.updatapartners.com/news/151/Updata-Partners-to-Acquire-CA-Technologies-Internet-Security-Business-Unit-/
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
In fact, Dr. Mark Russinovich &/or Nir Softer of NIRSOFT have had this happen to their applications too (pstools & others M.R. wrote, & many Nir Sofer wrote - but they are "double edged swords" tools, just like ping is!) Write either of them, they won't & DON'T deny it (and they don't like it, neither do I).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit!
APK
P.S.=> There's also a pack of trolls here, literally ADMITTED trolls, they run a domain called "trolltalk.com" in fact!
In THIS case, ac trolling me? Pay attention to "C" below, on gmhowell - he's stalking me via AC trolling posts!
(gmhowell, tomhudson, webmistressrachel, squiggleslash, ountertrolling, mcgrew, & other registered LUSER 'guises'),
They regularly cheat/game the moderation system, literally, in 2 ways:
---
1.) Modding themselves up in collusion/teams
2.) Modding down those they are stalking/harassing/trolling
---
Think it's bullshit? Ok, fine - here's where they LITERALLLY ADMIT TO ALL OF THE ABOVE & how they cheat the mod system here:
---
A.) countertrolling telling others how to moddown opponents as registered lusers 1st, then to logout to save your karma/cookie state of your reg'd luser account, & then to troll others via ac replies ->
He's NO different than MichaelKristopeit (having many reg'd accounts here) - a piece of trash online, period.
* Note that clone53421 & clone52431 only show up when either "clone" needs support OR to mod others down (or themselves up).
(Trashbags do that, like the Chinese Water Army OR HBGary (multiple trolling accounts)).
APK
P.S.=> There's also a pack of trolls here, literally ADMITTED trolls, they run a domain called "trolltalk.com" in fact!
In THIS case, ac trolling me? Pay attention to "C" below, on gmhowell - he's stalking me via AC trolling posts!
(gmhowell, tomhudson, webmistressrachel, squiggleslash, ountertrolling, mcgrew, & other registered LUSER 'guises'),
They regularly cheat/game the moderation system, literally, in 2 ways:
---
1.) Modding themselves up in collusion/teams
2.) Modding down those they are stalking/harassing/trolling
---
Think it's bullshit? Ok, fine - here's where they LITERALLLY ADMIT TO ALL OF THE ABOVE & how they cheat the mod system here:
---
A.) countertrolling telling others how to moddown opponents as registered lusers 1st, then to logout to save your karma/cookie state of your reg'd luser account, & then to troll others via ac replies -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652
B.) mcgrew stating how he modded up webmistressrachel 5 times, & she's his "partner in crime" around here (probably SAME person with multiple guises is my guess) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2212152&cid=36361542
C.) gmhowell admitting he's trolling me via AC posts (along with getting MichaelKristopeit all riled up & on my case):
http://slashdot.org/journal/276148/now-this-is-entertaining
D.) I've literally CAUGHT a fool named clone53421 posting in the same post as clone52431 (notice the #'s appended, not the same)
---
& plenty more I've caught doing bogus things around here to "fool the system/game the system"... would you like more? I can list them, in seconds!
... apk
Who are you? gmhowell?? Why post as AC then now hmmm??? First here, you ATTEMPTED SHITTING ON ME TWICE as AC POSTS (which my replies disprove easily) here too no less:
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38725916
and the SAME THING here too a SECOND time:
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38725632
AND WHAT I POST BELOW SHOWS YOU LITERALLY SAYING YOU'RE ADDING ON THINGS HERE AS AC POSTS -> http://slashdot.org/journal/276148/now-this-is-entertaining
(Cut the b.s., you're not fooling anyone... your reprehensible behavior shows QUITE otherwise!)
tomhudson's KNOWN & QUOTED BELOW as stalking me via AC replies too!
(tomhudson's your buddy, you're both around each other constantly, even in the link above where you're both saying post things onto this post, as ac's, because I don't see tomhudson OR gmhowell signed on the trolling/stalking/harassing posts... you're "thick as thieves" so don't TRY to "distance yourself" from tomhudson/trolltalk.com ...)
APK
P.S.=> Assuming you're gmhowell, which I am PRETTY SURE you are? Here's some quotes from you in the past regarding trolling myself:
"I've been trolling people for 36 years. Why would I stop now? I've also never denied trolling you. Why would I?" - by gmhowell (26755) on Sunday April 17, @05:03AM (#35846218) Homepage
QUOTED VERBATIM DIRECTLY FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35846218
"I never denied trolling you" - by gmhowell (26755) on Tuesday December 14 2010, @01:55AM (#34543612) Homepage Journal
QUOTED VERBATIM DIRECTLY FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1907528&cid=34543612
gmhowell posts journal on trolling myself, years ago now -> http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk
PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:
"The best thing about trolling APK?" - http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk
QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk
---
gmhowell says he will stop next below (after I got on his case) too:
"But seriously, I may stop" - by gmhowell on Thursday June 16, @09:38PM (#36470452) Attached to: The best thing about trolling APK?
and
"Hmm... Maybe oughta lay off for a while." - by gmhowell (26755) on Thursday June 16, @09:38PM (#36470452) Homepage
I took him @ his word, & then laid off on retrolling he, but?
gmhowell starts up YET again (now by AC posts only)!
Proof? Ok, this week -> http://slashdot.org/journal/276148/now-this-is-entertaining
---
gmhowell's part of the "trolltalk.com" crew (a domain tomhudson, a total scumbag troll actually keeps no less).
gmhowell hangs around with (or is just another alternate registered 'luser' guise tomhudson keeps) tomhudson, a known troll
(tomhudson = a miserable fat diabetic wreck too that can't program for shit & *thinks* she can but hasn't been noted for it in an
Additionally, "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" -> http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38727706
APK
P.S.=> You trolls are seriously messed up - grow up, get a life, & leave normal people like myself be...
... apk
I always post AC - nothing NEW for me (Not for U either though)
See my 'p.s.' below (you 2 have been caught stalking me via AC posts before!)
APK
P.S.=> tomhudson &/or gmhowell - you're "busted", right here below, in YOUR OWN WORDS:
"Wait until he starts on another kick, then reply to him as an AC. It's the new meme". - by tomhudson (43916) on Sunday May 09 2010, @08:29PM (#32150544) Homepage Journal
QUOTED VERBATIM DIRECTLY FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1646272&cid=32150544
"BTW - if you're going to tell this guy to stop spamming his hosts file crap, make sure you do it anonymously" - by tomhudson (43916) on Saturday April 16 2011, @11:45AM (#35840680) Journal
QUOTED VERBATIM DIRECTLY FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2086920&cid=35840680
---
"I've been trolling people for 36 years. Why would I stop now? I've also never denied trolling you. Why would I?" - by gmhowell (26755) on Sunday April 17, @05:03AM (#35846218) Homepage
QUOTED VERBATIM DIRECTLY FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35846218
"I never denied trolling you" - by gmhowell (26755) on Tuesday December 14 2010, @01:55AM (#34543612) Homepage Journal
QUOTED VERBATIM DIRECTLY FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1907528&cid=34543612
gmhowell posts journal on trolling myself, years ago now -> http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk
PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:
"The best thing about trolling APK?" - http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk
QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk
---
gmhowell says he will stop next below (after I got on his case) too:
"But seriously, I may stop" - by gmhowell on Thursday June 16, @09:38PM (#36470452) Attached to: The best thing about trolling APK?
and
"Hmm... Maybe oughta lay off for a while." - by gmhowell (26755) on Thursday June 16, @09:38PM (#36470452) Homepage
I took him @ his word, & then laid off on retrolling he, but?
gmhowell starts up YET again (now by AC posts only)!
Proof? Ok, this week -> http://slashdot.org/journal/276148/now-this-is-entertaining
... apkb
I can't be bothered to expend too much effort on annoying you or MK today, so if you could fill in the blanks I'd appreciate it. I'm looking for a reply that's long enough that it ends with a "Read rest of comment...." link. It should insult me, make comparisons between yourself and top Microsoft engineers, accuse me of being... I dunno, maybe Jeremiah Cornelius today? You pick... and include plenty of quotes from and links to positive testimonies of APK Tools and the use of HOSTS files. Please be sure to include a derogatory reference to "THOR SCHMUCK" (sic) too.
Thanks,
your pall.
PS: You write software identified by major security groups as malware. Nah-nah-ne-nah-nah.
CA's your source (& for the other minor leaguers, they're not major).
CA was busted in an accounting scandal & sold off their PC tools division (it chewed up emails where I work it was so bad).
So much for your "major security groups" (most of them are stumble bums that only leech data from a disreputable source in CA).
This has happened to Nir Sofer of NIRSOFT & Dr. Mark Russinovich of Microsoft (whom yes, used to be a co-worker/co-contractor of mine) as well. None of us like having wares we wrote get reported as "malware" when in fact they are not.
Why isn't "ping" listed thus? It could issue a "ping of death". Why isn't Spybot Search & Destroy?? It alters a HOSTS file.
APK
P.S.=> Your MAIN source is from a disreputable company that sold off the offending ware no less, & the sources of the others ARE that company (CA).
Again - Your sources are NOT "major security groups" - they're the bottom-feeders that falsely report on decent people's apps that aren't a threat (I passed all 21 questions of CA's tests for it, & they lowered its 'threat' to ZERO threat levels because of this)... apk
"Because there's nothing wrong with software modifying the HOSTS file per-se, especially in the context of actually trying to remove malware." - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 18, @12:28PM (#38739752)
1 of CA's 21 points for removal's HOSTS altering & I passed it & the other 20 questions too - hence ZERO THREAT LEVEL RATING on my app!
So, before you open your mouth stupid? Realize that is one of the points I had to pass for CA's criteria WAS hosts file alteration...
"Your app got blacklisted because it hid running applications" - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 18, @12:28PM (#38739752)
Again - My app's not even SCRIPTABLE for attack! Others are I listed though, & in 64-bit...
Hence why my app is NOT a threat - ZERO THREAT LEVELS RATED you done nothing with yourself ne'er-do-well dolt...
Can't you read, moron? We know you can't code, but reading english shouldn't be "beyond you".
Oh, also?
"No, it can't. Do you even know what the "ping of death" is?" - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 18, @12:28PM (#38739752)
Question is, do you dumbo?
Ping could issue a ping of death too dumb ass (except that's only on OLDER OS' before they patched it).
In case you didn't realize it dumbo, take a read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ping_of_death
"A ping of death (abbreviated "POD") is a type of attack on a computer that involves sending a malformed or otherwise malicious ping to a computer. A ping is normally 32 bytes in size (or 84 bytes when the Internet Protocol [IP] header is considered); historically, many computer systems could not handle a ping packet larger than the maximum IPv4 packet size, which is 65,535 bytes. Sending a ping of this size could crash the target computer.[1] In early implementations of TCP/IP, this bug was easy to exploit. This exploit has affected a wide variety of systems, including Unix, Linux, Mac, Windows, printers, and routers. However, most systems since 1997â"1998 have been fixed, so this bug is mostly historical.[1] Generally, sending a 65,536-byte ping packet would violate the Internet Protocol as written in RFC 791, but a packet of such a size can be sent if it is fragmented; when the target computer reassembles the packet, a buffer overflow can occur, which often causes a system crash."
---
* Most IP stacks are proofed vs. it nowadays though, afaik & since 2000 or thereabouts...
APK
P.S.=> No disputing that CA's a pack of KNOWN criminals caught in accounting frauds/scandals AND their PC tools division was sold off (lol)1
The rest of the "minor leaguers" you list? They get their information from CA, because I've spoken to a few of them in regards to this...
... apk
Ping of death was corrected in most OS around 2000, but there are NT boxes & even 9x boxes out there still - so, ping CAN still issue a "ping of death" - fact!
You don't get my point? No, you just won't ADMIT you were STUPID and you're not aware of what various companies (even disreputable ones like CA & their cronies you listed) list as requirements for removal or downgrades.
APK
P.S.=> Like I said also? Dr. Mark Russinovich of Microsoft, a former co-contractor/co-worker of mine & Nir Sofer of NIRSOFT have even had this happen to them (pstools & others from Mr. Russinovich, & Nir's tools, good as they are, get their share of being listed as "malware" falsely - write him, he & I have had HUGE discussions on this & neither of us like it)...
... apk
LOL, forgot to "stalk me" as AC again, douchebag? You blew it and now, you're going to regret it (think you're the only person that can "play games" like that idiot??)
"The same thing goes for the "Spybot SAD" hosts file modification thing." - by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday January 19, @01:27PM (#38750686) Homepage
LOL, don't make me LAUGH you little nobody - you've never even written a program that others use online, let alone one that's done WELL (as many of mine have, in tech shows, respected publications reviews, website reviews, being made into commercially sold code, & FAR more).
---
"You don't understand why CA was asking about modifying HOSTS" - by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday January 19, @01:27PM (#38750686) Homepage
LMAO - bullshit: I know for a FACT it's one of their 21 points for removal of programs or downrating them as to being 'threats' online (I passed every question, & now? ZERO THREAT LEVELS!)
---
"which interestingly enough probably means you unintentionally fed false information to them about the operation of your application. by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday January 19, @01:27PM (#38750686) Homepage
Ahem: Are you FUCKING STUPID or what?
I know you are, but THEY TEST IT THEMSELVES (if not disassemble & step trace it)...
Whoever submitted it wasn't aware it wasn't scriptable for attack & that's the MAIN REASON it was downrated to a zero threat level...
---
"You claim your app isn't scriptable, yet also claim it's "two lines of code" which means it cannot possibly verify that the application its hiding is what you intended it to be." - by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday January 19, @01:27PM (#38750686) Homepage
LMAO - The little STALKING LOSER is now "reaching for razors" but that won't save YOU as "the drowning man" here... lol!
To accomplish what the app does? Only 2 lines of active code... i.e.-> Most Shell/Spawn/Execute functions in compilers have PARAMETERS for INVISIBLY LAUNCHING APPS!
(Gosh - what's next? Declaring most ALL COMPILERS as "threats" online?? lol... )
THIS IS HOW I KNOW YOU CANNOT CODE FOR SHIT & YOU NEVER HAVE!
---
"So it is scriptable, and it is usable by a malware writer. - by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday January 19, @01:27PM (#38750686) Homepage
Dumbo - do you KNOW what argc/argv are in languages like C/C++ or even Python?
My app lacks that - it's IMPOSSIBLE thus to script it, & it MUST be run manually & locally on a system (not remotely).
I saw that much that far ahead... but, I did list a 64-bit version of the same type of thing that isn't "flagged as a malware" on the date I posted it... "strange that" eh? NOT!
Thor Schmuck F'd up submitting my app as a malware, bigtime, lol... based on ALL of the above, hence WHY my apps rated as no threat (zero threat level).
---
"Which is probably why most malware organizations still report the software as malware." - by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday January 19, @01:27PM (#38750686) Homepage
Most? LOL, I don't see you listing the TRUE MAJORS out there like:
AVG
McAfee
Norton
NOD32/ESET
Microsoft Security Essentials
etc./et al
& others of THEIR calibre (not the "bottom feeders" you noted, lol, minor leaguers that got their info. from CA! CA the "fine company" caught in CRIMINAL accounting scandals, & had to SELL OF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (their stuff was subpar compared to the likes of the above list I just put out).
---
"Meanwhile you post here over and over again with increasingly ridiculous assertions about your work and knowledge" - by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday January 19, @01:27PM (#387506
"No, it can't. No mainstream operating system has ever shipped with a version of ping that outputs malformed ping packets, let alone ping packets malformed in a way that would cause a PoD. Ever. Exploiting the PoD requires a specially written tool to output a malformed ping packet. You cannot use the ping command to do that. If I'm wrong, it's fairly easy to prove." - by squiggleslash (241428) on Thursday January 19, @01:27PM (#38750686) Homepage
Squiggleslash has to "eat his words" on PING OF DEATH now:
http://www.iss.net/security_center/advice/Intrusions/2000012/default.htm
---
PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:
"Ping of death can actually be run from older versions of Windows. At a command line, simply type: ping -l 65550 VICTIM"
Just like I said it was, here:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38753762
You STUPID little ignorant NOOB... lol, & YOU SAID I DON'T KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT? LOL, speak for yourself, dimwit... lol!
---
* That all "said & aside", you anonymously stalking/harassing trolling scumbag? U FAIL vs. myself, as always... lol!
APK
P.S.=> Hey stupid, tell us - How does 'eating your words' taste, especially when you stuck YOUR FOOT IN YOUR DUMB ASS MOUTH & ALSO FLAVORED IT WITH "the bitter taste of defeat"?... accept it - you can try to troll/stalk/harass me via AC replies as you have, but you blew it YET again, vs. myself, as always... & you KNOW I've just GOTTA say it:
This? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'", lmao... especially vs. this little ac stalking/harassing little WEASEL of a registered 'luser' named Squiggleslash who'd been stalking/harassing me via AC replies here (proof of that's regarding THIS VERY THREAD & his admitting he's doing it elsewhere -> )
U FAIL TROLL, lol... as usual, vs. myself - even when you TRY to do it "on the down-low/sly" via ac trolling posts, too bad you posted as yourself this time, eh? Stupid, lol...
...apk
Your link is simply wrong. A conforming TCP/IP stack does not allow such a ping packet to actually make it to the Internet if sent via the calls most implementations of ping use. Indeed, the only machines that would not check the size are the machines vulnerable to the PoD in the first place - ie you might be able to use it to crash your own PC, but you couldn't use it to crash another PC.
In any case, your assertion is that the ping utility TODAY could be considered malware because, you claim, it can be used to send the "ping of death".
So let's repeat the challenge.
You have a cmd.exe window open on a Windows 7 PC. Or a Windows XP PC. Or Vista. Or a terminal window with a bash prompt on any version of Mac OS X, or any version of Ubuntu, or any version of OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD.
Tell me what to type to get ping to send a ping of death.
You can't. It's just not possible. No operating system ships with a version of ping capable of sending the PoD.
If I were you, I'd give up. Let's recap:
1. Ping cannot be used to send the PoD. If it could, you'd demonstrate, and file a bug report, rather than say vague statements about older operating systems that do not even make sense.
2. There's a major difference between an anti-spyware tool making modifications to a hosts file, and a piece of spyware doing the same. Your inability to tell the difference means you've almost certainly passed false information on to CA.
3. Your "two lines of code" is obviously scriptable.
4. You cannot tell the difference between someone ridiculing you, and someone stalking you.
Finally, just a reminder: when we first conversed online, I was trying to help you out by pointing out that you weren't exactly presenting yourself in the best light. You choose to treat such advice in the same way that you've treated virtually everyone else you argue with online. Now I'm making fun of you. As is Tom, GMHowell, and all the others who find you hysterical.
I just logged in and found you responded to all my most recent comments, in many cases, multiple times, with the same ridiculous APKish speal. This is supposed to make people view you positively, and me negatively, how, exactly?
"BUT ME... (nobody..." (see video below, & this link) -> http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2610052&cid=38754490
(Says it all...The Atomic Punk... now THAT's an idea for a "registered 'luser'" name for me, lol... !)
"Nuff Said"... (Yes, Stan Lee - I read your work from the Marvel genre)
:) Oh the irony : My "captcha" is SCHOOL, & you have been SENT there, & schooled by "yours truly"...
APK
P.S.=> "I RULE!" - Do you like Van Halen (especially early late 1970's stuff, post "mammoth" era)?
"On every wall or place my fearsome name is hurled...
If so - this, is ME -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1m-DYM7JvMA , lol... especially vs. you, stalker...
... apk