New Technique For Mass-Producing Microbots Inspired By Origami

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

New Technique For Mass-Producing Microbots Inspired By Origami

Posted by samzenpus on Thursday February 16, 2012 @10:23PM from the here's-your-fold-bot dept.

Zothecula writes "Inspired by origami and children's pop-up books, Harvard engineers have pioneered a means of mass-producing bee-sized flying microrobots. The breakthrough mechanizes the already state-of-the art process of making Harvard's Mobee robots by hand, by mass producing flat assemblies by the sheet which can be folded and assembled in a single movement. The technique, which cunningly exploits existing machinery for making printed circuit boards, can theoretically be applied to a multitude of electromechanical machines."

28 comments

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Bullshit ? by Taco+Cowboy · 2012-02-16 22:57 · Score: 2

This kind of bullshit technology is always featured here on fanboi central, but never turns into anything real.
Bullshit technology?
Never turns into anything real?
Who says it's bullshit? The thing may not be "useful" today, it does not mean the technology can not be adapted to do something very very useful in the future

--
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
1. Re:Bullshit ? by mcgrew · 2012-02-17 03:31 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  Please don't feed the trolls.
  
  --
  Free Martian Whores!
Familiar pattern? by clyde_cadiddlehopper · 2012-02-16 23:20 · Score: 4, Interesting

This demonstrates low cost mass production. Just add mobility, communication, coordination, and sensing. Drop a swarm of these into any dangerous environment and, voila, instant info. Now, think of GPS surveillance, peeking through walls for IR signatures, drone surveillance aircraft, night vision, ... The first use of microbots will be for military or hazardous waste cleanup or such. But microbots, like their predecessors, will ultimately be used to monitor the general public.

--
Obi-Wan: "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were sudden
1. Re:Familiar pattern? by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-16 23:52 · Score: 1
  
  How about a little ricin? Or some very high grade explosive?
  Honestly, why bother with nukes, bombers, aircraft carriers, rail guns etc, when you can simply drop a few canisters of these toys. But wait! Why bother identifing soldiers when you could simply set them to sting ever living being?
2. Re:Familiar pattern? by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-17 00:32 · Score: 0
  
  So... Invest in bug-zapping lasers?
3. Re:Familiar pattern? by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-17 01:34 · Score: 0
  
  Think bigger -- invest in your _own_ microbots.
4. Re:Familiar pattern? by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-17 07:38 · Score: 0
  
  Thing bigger, just enclose your home in a Faraday cage. Something that size wont have a very large battery and/or memory. Then design the internals of your home so that they resemble a complex maze with several loops. If they work hard enough to get your data after that then they can have it...
5. Re:Familiar pattern? by Tyrannosaur · 2012-02-17 08:42 · Score: 1
  
  peeking through walls for IR signatures
  Dude, not only are wallhacks against the rules, they are very n00bish. Please don't. Or you may be banned.
6. Re:Familiar pattern? by Ihmhi · 2012-02-17 08:59 · Score: 1
  
  Or even better, you could build one of these factories into a robotic dog's head, attach it to Big Dog, and have the world's most perfect anti-intruder system.
  
  --
  Random Thoughts From A Diseased Mind (Not For Dummies)
One question. by Robert+Zenz · 2012-02-16 23:53 · Score: 3, Interesting

Does that thing fly? And if yes, how are it's flight characteristics?
1. Re:One question. by psergiu · 2012-02-17 01:35 · Score: 2
  
  Not yet - http://robobees.seas.harvard.edu/research/body
  
  --
  1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
2. Re:One question. by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-17 02:31 · Score: 1
  
  Does that thing fly? And if yes, how are it's flight characteristics?
  The current "pop-up" book version was designed to prove the construction technique not really a flight weight vehicle. However a different prototype of theirs had first flight several years ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1XA7klBiCA since then they have been working on improving other aspects of the vehicle, speed up manufacture, and rehttp://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/02/17/0335246/new-technique-for-mass-producing-microbots-inspired-by-origami#searching proper control laws to flight something like this stably.
3. Re:One question. by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-17 05:06 · Score: 0
  
  However a different prototype of theirs had first flight several years ago.
  I'm not sure if the video is lacking, but my definition of flight doesn't include having rails to prevent all movement except vertical.
Skynet should produce more microbots by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-17 00:12 · Score: 0

Why doesn't Skynet think of mass-producing microbots and nanobots? They would have a greater advantage against the humans.
They should also invest more CPU usage into developing bio-weapons. Machines can't get sick and they don't care about the Geneva nor the Hague conventions, because those only apply to those who sign them.
Construction Process by Whibla · 2012-02-17 00:17 · Score: 3, Insightful

An excellent video (and I do not use the term lightly) showing animations and video footage of the assembly of the Mobee...
echo^^

Harvard has filed numerous patent applications associated with the process, and is working with business to "identify disruptive applications in a range of industries."
While I'm sure there will be anti-patent people saying that since the process is "Inspired by origami and children's pop-up books" there's nothing novel or original in it, and prior art should invalidate their patents, for once I'm not sure I agree. I watched the video, and was inspired. Disruptive applications doesn't say the half of it!
1. Re:Construction Process by mcgrew · 2012-02-17 02:47 · Score: 1
  
  While I'm sure there will be anti-patent people saying that since the process is "Inspired by origami and children's pop-up books" there's nothing novel or original in it, and prior art should invalidate their patents, for once I'm not sure I agree.
  I'm sure I disagree. This is novel and new and should be able to be patented. Everything novel and new comes from what came before, "shoulders of giants" and all that. All science, all technology, all art. Everything.
  
  --
  Free Martian Whores!
Wasn't it bad enough... by wbr1 · 2012-02-17 00:40 · Score: 1

....when African Bees got released into the wild in N/S America? Now we can have swarms of mass produced robot bees? I'm telling ya, the Mayan's are looking smarter and smarter by the day.

--
Silence is a state of mime.
1. Re:Wasn't it bad enough... by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-17 01:21 · Score: 1
  
  Smarter for not making robot bees?
2. Re:Wasn't it bad enough... by ch-chuck · 2012-02-17 01:53 · Score: 1
  
  for scheduling the EOTW (as we know it) at the moment of the technological singularity.
  
  --
  try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
3. Re:Wasn't it bad enough... by Anonymous Coward · 2012-02-17 02:44 · Score: 0
  
  They're smarter because their calendar was based on the zodiac signs?
MIT Origami by garthsundem · 2012-02-17 00:49 · Score: 2

Has everyone seen MacArthur winner and MIT prof Erik Demaine's origami? Really, a collection of some of the most brilliant things I've ever seen.

--
GeekDad, TED speaker, Wipeout loser, author of Brain Trust
Hey I submitted this two days ago! by wisebabo · 2012-02-17 02:23 · Score: 2

It was downmodded to oblivion in the "recent" section and the editors didn't post it! I guess people didn't like my nose joke, they're so picky!
wisebabo writes
"Until we have nano bot self replicators* this is a good way to make LOTS of tiny robots cheaply. It leverages our huge technological infrastructure in making 2D chips into 3D bots!
*I guess if you think viruses are nano bots then I guess we already know how to make them already. I was cooking up a batch in my nose just last week!"
Link to Original Source
1. Re:Hey I submitted this two days ago! by WrecklessSandwich · 2012-02-17 16:08 · Score: 1
  
  Try writing an objective, informative summary next time. If you want to make nose jokes, make them in the comments.
Synergies with printable technologies by Blackjax · 2012-02-17 02:39 · Score: 1

It is possible to print solar cells, electronic circuits, capacitors, batteries, and antennas on flat flexible sheets. It seems to me that if you combined those technologies with this you'd be able to make completely functional robots.
Biomimetic Millisystems Lab by nameer · 2012-02-17 02:44 · Score: 1

Berkeley is doing similarly cool stuff in their Biomimetic Millisystems Lab .

--
"Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
What about Lego ? by Latinhypercube · 2012-02-17 05:15 · Score: 1

I was watching this great documentary yesterday:-
(Megafactories Lego)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxqhi-EWYEk&feature=player_embedded#!
and it occurred to me that Lego is a very scalable and flexible model for Nanotech... with each element reusable.
There was a factoid, that just eight standard bricks can be reconfigure in millions of different ways...