Slashdot Mirror


30 Years of the TRS-80 Model 100

An anonymous reader writes with this "interview with John R Hogerhuis, one of the key players in the still suprisingly active community for the TRS-80 Model 100 portable computer. As the Model 100 approaches its 30th birthday, John talks about what has kept the machine popular for so long, current software and hardware work that is keeping it relevant, and what modern developers could learn from spending some on a computer from 1983."

143 comments

  1. Apparently running the website, too by msobkow · · Score: 5, Funny

    No comments yet, and the server is already slashdotted...

    It must be running on one of those old beasties. :P

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Apparently running the website, too by Announcer · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Willie...
    2. Re:Apparently running the website, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      TRS-80 Model 100: Interview With John R. Hogerhuis
      Tom Nardi April 21, 2012 2
      TRS-80 Model 100: Interview With John R. Hogerhuis

      Last month, on something of a whim, I wrote up an introduction and guide to working with the TRS-80 Model 100, one of the first ever “notebook” computers, released in 1983. The Model 100 was something that had always interested me, and I thought I would share some of my experiences with getting software installed on it, and maybe introduce this nearly 30 year old piece of hardware to a new audience.

      Much to our surprise, the Model 100 guide quickly became one of the most popular pieces the site has ever run, completely dominating the site traffic in March. Clearly there is a lot of interest in this device, but why? We’re talking about a machine that’s older than many of this sites readers (and indeed, a few of the writers).

      To try and get to the bottom of the Model 100s continuing popularity almost three decades after its release, we spent some time talking to John R. Hogerhuis, a key player in the Model 100 community. John’s unique perspective gives us an inside look at this extremely dedicated and knowledgeable community.
      Getting Involved

      John Hogerhuis

      The Powerbase: John, thanks for taking the time to answer a few questions for us. Why don’t you start by telling our readers a little bit about yourself?

      John: First of all Tom, thank you for your initial introduction to the Model 100.

      I’m happy to answer your questions, and gratified at the interest in the Model T and our community.

      I grew up fascinated by computers. I had a TRS-80 Color Computer, and later a Tandy Coco 3 (still have the Coco 3). I learned to program by reading books and typing in BASIC program listings which, once upon a time, appeared in hobbyist computer magazines. I went on to get a degree in computer science from Cal State Fullerton. After working as a programmer I went back to school and got my MBA with a focus on entrepreneurship. I make my living by doing contract software development.

      I’m married and have three kids which get most of my free time. What is left goes to reading and my retrocomputing hobby, primarily Model T discussions and projects.

      The Powerbase: How are you involved with the Model 100 community?

      John: I run the mailing list and the Bitchin100.com web site and wiki. I write and maintain software for the machine and share it with my friends in the community. I try to maintain the friendly list culture that has developed over the years on the mailing list. Via the list and private email, I work with other folks across the globe to encourage new projects and assist with testing and development when I have spare cycles.

      "Fun and Useful Stuff"

      I am the author of DLPilot, LaddieCon, HTERM, and TBACK.

      DLPilot and LaddieCon are “external storage” services that simulate a Tandy Portable Disk Drive.

      HTERM is a terminal program that implements hardware flow control, UTF-8 character set mapping, and baud rates up to 76800bps. It is my first major bit of 8085 assembly, with some of the code (a perfect hash function for the UTF-8 mapper) generated by a Perl script. My current goal is to add Zmodem support to it.

      TBACK is a command line swiss army to manage a Model T’s RAM file system without having to install a disk service on it. Very much a work-in-progress.

      HTERM and LaddieCon are available in source form via Git repositories hosted at Bitchin100.com. TBACK is not currently shared other than with those who have asked to see it.

      The Powerbase: Between the mailing list, Wiki, and your Model 100 software projects, it seems pretty safe to say you are a serious devotee to this nearly 30 year old computer. What’s kept you interested for so long?

      John: Well I didn’t actually own a Model 100 until about 2004. As a Coco kid, I salivated over Model 100 ads in the magazines and Tandy catalogs. I thought it would be great

    3. Re:Apparently running the website, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Actually no, that's the sad part. We use Dreamhost and pay for their premium services and they can never handle the heat. We are switching to HostGator and we were hoping to finish the move before we got Slashdotted again!

    4. Re:Apparently running the website, too by Faffin · · Score: 1

      Not completely, took about 2 min to load though. You beat me on the "It must be running on one" thing by several minutes though. All I can say is imagine a Beowulf cluster of these :P

    5. Re:Apparently running the website, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is imagine a Beowulf cluster of these :P

      I have a few boxes of these sitting in my closet, along with accessories. I could actually make a Beowulf cluster of them.

    6. Re:Apparently running the website, too by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Says anonymous coward paid by the second company to pretend to be the operator?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  2. I've one of those on my desk at work. by PotatoHead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Great curio. It runs forever on a set of AA batteries, and I've written a few BASIC programs to show it off. Once in a great while, I'll take notes on it, transferring back to PC via serial cable.

    Love the keyboard, and the BASIC environment is the last OS type code that Bill Gates wrote.

    1. Re:I've one of those on my desk at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get off-the -shelf serial-to-bluetooth adapters, so you could probably transfer it to most laptops and phones.

    2. Re:I've one of those on my desk at work. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Wait! Gates wrote the code for the TRS-80 Model 100 portable computer?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:I've one of those on my desk at work. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, back in the day, Bill Gates got his teeth wet writing BASIC interpreters for ROM chips. They turned front panel switch programmed paperweights into something a hobbyist computer geek could play with and actually do fun stuff, back in the Stone Age.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    4. Re:I've one of those on my desk at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And wayback when it wasn't the OS but mass storage (TRS-II 300 baud? cassette tape) that kept you waiting.
      1 Load assembler, load source (another 30 mins). 2 Assemble, save binary, reboot, load binary(another 30 mins.), 3 test , reboot, load source and edit, save source(another 30 mins.), 4 IF (TIRED EXHAUSTED) THEN goto 1. 5 GOSUB EAT, 6 GOSUB SLEEP, 7 GOTO 1. Repeat and rinse.
      No, I don't use Gentoo today :).
      The function "another 30 mins" should, with a modern OS, be replaced with a fork(toilet_process()) || fork(have_surgery_on_exploded_bladder());.
      At least one would definitely learn to debug first and run _after_ debugging.
      Sheesh...

    5. Re:I've one of those on my desk at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, Bill would check and add code to Windows all the way up until the mid 90's . He's a smarth, if ruthless, guy.

    6. Re:I've one of those on my desk at work. by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Mine's sitting in a closet, some minor battery leak corrosion damage, still works great though. I used it to take notes in Psych 101, rigged a 6-volt lantern battery to it and it ran for probably 2-3 months on one set. When I was at my parents last year, my mom had been cleaning out a closet and found my Disk/Video Interface, which gave you a 5.25" floppy drive, and also found my 3.5" floppy drive for it. I actually had a Lisp system for it, I've never seen a program crash a computer so fast.

      It is probably my one old computer that I will never get rid of. Good memories.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    7. Re:I've one of those on my desk at work. by gatzke · · Score: 1

      I think that is the only laptop I have ever seen with a real full-depth keypress keyboard. I sometimes wish I had picked one up...

  3. Response time by tomhath · · Score: 1

    The nice thing about those old computers was the response time. Type something, hit the enter key, and the prompt was ready for the next line. Of course you couldn't really do anything with them except play the simplest games, but still...

    1. Re:Response time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, what do you mean couldn't do anything. They were a programmable portable computer at a time that not many had computers. I remember writing quiz programs, adventure games, a ... what would you call a lunar lander game except landing on earth? I used it to figure out mathematical formulas since programmable calculators didn't work. I agree that a lot of people use have been taught to respond to computers, just like phones I suppose, phone rings you have to answer it. Personally, computers are tools, and though the equipment I use is more powerful nowdays, the model 100 had lots of functionality there wasn't anything to compete with it at the time unless you wanted to lug around an osborne.

    2. Re:Response time by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Simplest games? I had written several Space exploration games that were quite complex. You had to read your sensor and change your course based on sensor input. you could also input a formula based on the sensor variables and create a type of "auto pilot" as well. It was very cool playing with a text only simulation of the Solar system and slingshot the ship around trying to use the least amount of fuel to land on titan from earth.

      It required a knowledge of Physics and trigonometry to play the game.

      I had also written several combat simulators One was three player using a special serial cable with diodes. I never did find a third person to play with so we used the Old Co-Co as a third player.

      They are highly advanced computers. Even the Sharp Pocket PC was advanced enough to do some amazing things. People are utterly spoiled with their insane levels of computing available today.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Response time by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wha?? Play games? This was a *portable* computer, it was made for serious work. Typing text really hasn't changed (except for that great *cough* HTMLization) and all a serious writer ever really needs is a text editor to do real work.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Response time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I worked for a company where we designed a CNC controlled contact lens lathe using the 102. We made quite a few, then briefly ported the software to the BBC Model B then finally to the PC using GWBasic. The 100/102 was an excellent machine in may ways.

    5. Re:Response time by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      and all a serious writer ever really needs is a text editor to do real work

      Well, that and the ability to store reasonable sized text files. A typical article can be 10-15KB of plain text. The 32KB of RAM in the TRS-80 doesn't leave much left over for the text editor. Having a spell check is also convenient, and that typically requires 1MB or so for the data.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Response time by jhoger · · Score: 1

      Hence the reason why recent hardware projects like REX and NADSBox have been important. NADSBox adds an external hard disk. REX is a completely plug-and-play Option ROM which you can switch OptROMs and save/restore full RAM images to flash.

  4. Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years old. by ihaveamo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All the big-names are 30 years old just now.

    This includes the TRS80 Color computer (The computer that got me into this crazy field in the first place... OS9 for ever!)
    , Commodore VIC 20, 64, Apple II, ZX Spectrum, Amstrad They are all are / going to be in their 30's !!.

    Who feels old now??

  5. Sad state of modern technology ... by Cassini2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Model 100 had a number of features that modern computers lack. If you need a simple computer to make notes, its battery life was in the 20 hours region. It was many many long years before the modern PC laptop was "portable" and had a battery life greater than 3 hours. (I'm thinking of some of the old transportables, which weighed 35 lbs and had no batteries.)

    At long last, with the advent of the OLPC, the Eee PC, the smartphone, and a few of the smaller laptops, battery life has reached the 6 to 12 hours. However, for taking a piece of equipment to strange places with no power, being able to use AA batteries to power your computer is a really helpful feature.

    Really wish the modern laptop could run from batteries longer. It's sad that a 30 year old PC is still competitive with regards to battery life.

    1. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      It really was the first of its kind. Yes, Osbourn had a "portable" computer, which stretched the definition heavily, but the Model 100, well it was pretty much the first laptop.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It revolutionised journalism because it make it possible for articles to be written once and uploaded via a phone line. It must have put a lot of typists out of work.

    3. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Howitzer86 · · Score: 0

      I have a ASUS Transformer with a keyboard dock. It gets 16 hours of battery life, and is pretty good at taking notes. You can also record the lecturer, take pictures of the white board and insert it into your notes (using Evernote).

      Yeah... it took a really long time to get here, but then we had other priorities - like computing power (overheating P3s in 12 pound laptops anyone?), wifi internet access, and modern operating systems.

    4. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Didn't Jerry Pournelle use one and write a lot about it?

    5. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Omineca · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking that the first one I ever saw (in real life, not in the radio shack catalog) belonged to a roommate who was a radio reporter. It was 1990, and there really was nothing that quite matched it even then. I was totally jealous. I couldn't find one and ended up buying a smith corona pwp-something or other... which you could haul around .... but it was bigger than briefcase size and single-purpose.

    6. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't recall that but I wouldn't be surprised.

    7. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      There's always the Dana AlphaSmart. It's sold as a computer for children, but it is a lot like the Model 100.

    8. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Psion Series 5/5mx ran quite long on two AA batteries. IIRC it was somewhere between 10 and 20 hours, which is quite OK - I never had to use the PDA for 20 hours straight. Even if it ran out of energy, a new set of battereis can be bought almost anywhere (I mainly used rechargeable batteries).

    9. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point is that the metrics you quote don't actuually help modern computers. My laptop runs at 1.6 GHz but it still has trouble performing everyday tasks. The software from the model 100 should absolutely fly on my laptop, probably to the point where you wouldn't see a difference. The problem is that programmers now operate in an abstract world where they do their little job and if you have performance issues then that can be blamed on a different layer in the system. I see this in my day job and you wouldn't believe the horrors. There was one guy using XML serialisation as a form of type cast, and building the intermediate xml documents as nested strings as the object hierarchy was traversed. It took a good part of a second to process one record, of which we get a thousand messages per second. Very elegant but the purpose of the job is to stay in business you know?

    10. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And I did more on that 4khz processor than you will ever do on a 20 core 22thz 90tb machine.

      People today dont know how to use computers, they know how to run a toaster.

    11. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the Model 100 had going for it was that for the target market you could put in 4 new AA batteries at 8 in the morning, set the clock (if needed) and start working, and not need to be plugged in again until midnight. For writers, and people doing data gathering in the field, this really does mean that you can work all day. The keyboard pretty much feels comfortable, you don't have extra hardware to keep track of in the field, (where did I drop that wireless mouse again?) and so on.

      No it doesn't have an HD or Wysiwyg display. It's not going to run 3d games very well. etc. You are not going to watch TV on it, or have it read that book aloud to you. It's not the latest and greatest hardware. On the other hand what it did, and for what it was capable of doing, there really was not a lot of competition. It's not the sexy gadget of the week for endgadget or techcrunch. That's OK.

      I don't recall the specs of the model 100, but the model 200 had an Intel 80c85 processor, with 3 26k banks of memory available. Each bank was available to the user as 19k of usable memory. The 200 had a 40 column by 16 line lcd display that folded over the keyboard, and that device gave Tandy a patent on the clamshell design for laptop and pocket computers they earned royalties on for the next 17 years.

      I'm not saying that it was the sexiest device. But you would be hard pressed to find a device in the digital technology sector that has put in as many hours of work in as many fields, as the TRS-80 Model 100 (and by extension 102 and 200) portable computer.

      --
      You never know...
    12. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by gman003 · · Score: 2

      You missed the point.

      He didn't say the 100 had the power of a modern computer, or could run anything approaching modern programs.

      However, go find me a COMPUTER that has a battery life of half a work week, running off the kind of batteries I'd find at Wal-Mart or 7-11. It has to be a complete, self-reliant computer - I should be able to not just install any program I want, but *write* any program I can write, all without needing any other computer.

      I did some looking. There's a few ebook readers with 20+ hour battery lives, but I couldn't find any proper computers, no matter what "horsepower".

    13. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by spookthesunset · · Score: 1, Troll

      Isn't that how it should be? Who gives a shit if you know how to "use a computer"? They are fucking tools. No more. No less.

      If anything, it is amazing how little you need to know to do really cool shit. Like, anybody can start a website using nothing but off the shelf tools... isn't that amazing? We live in amazing times. That 4khz proc is bullshit compared to it. "know how to use computers"... pshaw...

    14. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Still have one, still works like the day I bought it... Paid around $800 for it as I recall, and it was the low end 8K version.. Dug it out and put a set of AA's in it, and it works great...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    15. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For similar reasons a certain Texas lawyer and his two sons gained advantage by using them for oil and mineral rights ownership research and the leasing of said rights. Everything was uploaded to and stored on the drives connected a TRS 80 in the lawyer's office which was used to create much of the accompanying documentation. They used multiple crews visiting court houses and survey offices etc. By their own accounts they were the first to use portable computing for that purpose.

    16. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. It was very popular with journalists, all the way into the 1990's. I remember seeing one at the Radio Shack in 1992, amazed that it was still being sold as an active product. The manager gave the same explanation as to why the computer still sold--journalists. Think about it. It was extremely portable, had a great keyboard, ran great on off the shelf batteries, and had a built in modem. What more could a reporter want?

      I do know someone currently in college who bought one of these at a garage sale and uses it in school, to the bewilderment of all his classmates.

    17. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Did you just call that elegant??

    18. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2

      It really was the first of its kind. Yes, Osbourn had a "portable" computer, which stretched the definition heavily, but the Model 100, well it was pretty much the first laptop.

      The Epson HX-20 got there first in 1981. Granted the screen wasn't as big, but the overall package is similar. It even has a built in printer and an optional micro cassette recorder for data storage. It even featured dual CPUs (one main CPU, the other handled I/O) at a whopping 0.6Mhz. The later PX-4 and PX-8 had a bigger screen and ran CP/M.

    19. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Sure, its all recursion, simple xml DOM tree manipulation, and calls to encode and decode a stream. Its an elegant design but horrible to run. I am sure modern software is loaded with performance sinks like that.

      Oh (and now you got me started) there is a tendency for developers to turn efficient high level languages with strong typing into weakly typed performance sucks like perl by using string keys, root classes (every domain object really is an Object) and type casts all over the place.

    20. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Psion 3 & 5.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    21. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you didn't. Grandpa please get back to your rocking chair. I've done plenty on these and modern computers, there is no comparison what a person who know what he/she is doing can do on a modern computer vs these ancient machines. You can get down to just as much nitty gritty as you could with them; you're just not forces to as much

    22. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Osborne weighs 26lbs -- what the heck weighed 35?

      Checking wiki... Kaypro 29lbs (totally worth it), Compaq 28lbs, SX-64 23lbs. The Apple ][c with monitor was 25.5lbs. Hell, an A1000 with the beautiful big colour 14" 1080 is 41lbs.

    23. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      I actually had one of these: http://developer.novell.com/yes/56439.htm (mine was a PIII-800 with 256MB of RAM, but otherwise the same)... It never had problems with heat, and actually still works (though the battery is long-dead, and I don't feel like spending the $$ to buy a new one)

      I know you're making an example for effect, but lightweight powerful laptops that don't overheat have existed for a while. It wasn't that we had other priorities, it was that the power requirements of modern processors was outpacing the capabilities of battery technology. You get 16h of battery life out of your Asus by using a 2nd battery (the keyboard dock is 90% battery), and by using a very low power processor. If you remove the keyboard dock, you only get about 6h of battery life, according to Asus. :)

      Case in point, my current laptop is a Dell Vostro V130n... I have taken it apart to service the hard drive, and the battery itself is not much bigger than a CD jewel case (thinner by about 1mm, but wider in one direction by about 3cm, about the same volume displacement). This is enough to power a dual core processor with a 13.3" LCD, 2GB of RAM, and a spinny platter hard drive for almost 3h. 10 years ago, the same capabilities in a battery would have been 3 or 4 times as large, and the system it drove would not have been anywhere near as powerful.

    24. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it the 100s were popular with reporters who worked in far-flung locales for all the reasons previously stated, plus the modem's 300-baud modem worked on less-than-stellar phone networks - fast enough for text.
       
      .

    25. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kindles with keyboards are running Linux with Busybox, so you use #!/bin/sh instead of BASIC, but you can still write programs. KiTerm lets you get at the shell, and there are python scripts that can get you the root password given the model and serial number.

    26. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      A couple of years ago one of the columnists in the local paper here was waxing on about using on as a sports reporter in the early 80s. It really did revolutionize sports reporting and was better than having to lug around a typewriter and rush back. I would post his column but the stupid local paper puts old articles and columns behind a pay wall and you can't really search for the old ones all that well.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    27. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I think the 100 has benefited from improvements in battery technology. Time was when the joke was that Radio Shack created the Model 100 to _sell_ batteries (and it drew slightly too much for the rechargeables of that era to power it, so one would tape a battery to the outside of the case and wire that in to the others).

      I think I still have an old magazine which has an editorial where they make this joke (including a mention of how many friends one had to sign up for the ``Battery of the month club'' to power one's Model 100).

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    28. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by wintersdark · · Score: 1

      Not really fair; a modern computer with a similar feature set could handily function for an absurd amount of time.

      A RaspberryPi (or similar tiny PC) could run forever on a comparable power supply and offer much more functionality.

      --
      Meh.
    29. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... by metaforest · · Score: 1

      Really wish the modern laptop could run from batteries longer. It's sad that a 30 year old PC is still competitive with regards to battery life.

      In 1994 I stumbled across a model 100 that someone had thrown out. Apparently it had suffered a fresh water immersion at some point, and a few traces on the mobo were damaged. After looking it over a bit and seeing that the damage was really not all that bad. I green-wired the bad traces, replaced a few passives that looked larfy, and was rewarded with a fully functional "toy computer."

      At first I was not terribly impressed with it. Slow. Not very rechargeable. (NiMH was still way to expensive to justify going that route) No sane backup system. No backlight. etc. I messed around with it a bit, scrounged up the manuals, and even found a memory mod for it. However it was a real good icebreaker in the coffee shops. Eventually, it ended up moth-balled in the closet.

      In 1996 I took a break from the tech world and did a stint as a back-country ranger in Olympic National Park.
      Many of the duties that a ranger does involves writing small field reports. After a ten day stint in the back country, the reports were entered into a clunky DB maintained at HQ that had a dial-up interface. All the other rangers kept a logbook or even just a spiral notepad in a ziplock bag for this, but they get trashed, lost, rained on, mouse chewed, folded, spindled, mutilated.

      At first I tried using a Powerbook 100 for this(my first laptop), but though it had decent battery life, I was really uncomfortable about having it damaged, or stolen. Then I remembered the Model 100....

      It was perfect for this: light, rugged, solid-state, redundant memory backup, nearly full-sized keys, fits perfectly in a large zip-lock freezer bag, it can the same batteries as the park issued radio I carried(AA niCad), and it has a built in DBMS, and text editor. With a bit more work I wrote a program that would upload all my reports directly to HQ's database. Posting my tour reports took all of 10 minutes, and I didn't have to wait for the PC in the ranger station to get freed up to do it. I just dialed in directly to HQ's clunky mainframe from the bunk-house.

      OTHO I think the ranger community wanted to see me burned at the stake for practicing sorcery. Something about my solution to the documentation requirements for the job deeply unnerved them. I was constantly getting grumbly jabs about being some slick, rich(?!) city kid who "doesn't get it."

  6. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    I do. My first computer was a TRS-80 MC-10 (a sort of little brother to the CoCo that run a 6803, where I did my first assembly language experiments). The first actual code I wrote was on a Commodore 64 and I mucked around with Integer BASIC on Apple II's at school. And OS9 definitely rocked, and BASIC-09 is still for me the best structured BASIC variant ever developed. I'd take my Pascal programming class at school and with relative ease port the code I wrote over to BASIC-09.

    Gawd I do feel old.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. I had the Olivetti version by Quila · · Score: 1

    With flip-up screen. It was sweet, helped me get through high school. Yes, I was the geek with the laptop, the only kid in school who had one (bought cheap from DAK with summer job money). Gave me and my friend some fun self-wiring a connection between than and his Model 100 until we realized the motherboards and connectors were flipped between the two.

    1. Re:I had the Olivetti version by hawk · · Score: 1

      The model 200 TRS-80 had that screen, too.

      There were three versions of the machine known as the model 100--the TRS-80, Olivetti, and I forget the third. There were minor differences between them.

      hawk

    2. Re:I had the Olivetti version by Quila · · Score: 1

      The third we saw was an NEC. They were all based on a Japanese Kyocera computer.

  8. Trash-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In those days everyone called it the "Trash 80", probably including unit owners (as typical techie deprecating humor). TRS stood for "Tandy-Radio Shack", Tandy being the original name of the company that is now known as Radio Shack, and which would like to be known as "The Shack".

    1. Re:Trash-80 by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia it is still called Tandy, though the stores have gone downhill in the last 30 years.

    2. Re:Trash-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRS stood for "Tandy-Radio Shack", Tandy being the original name of the company that is now known as Radio Shack, and which would like to be known as "The Shack".

      So TRS could also mean The Radio Shack

      73

    3. Re:Trash-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the "80" referred to ZILOG's Z80 microprocessor, NOT Intel's 8080/8085.

    4. Re:Trash-80 by Maxmin · · Score: 1

      Some refer to it as "Rat Shack."

      Whenever I visit one, it's usually in desperation for an electronic component or battery that I can't wait to order online from a cheaper source. I almost always beeline it for the proper store section, but that doesn't stop the sales droids from trying to (up)sell me on mobile phone equipment or contracts.

      --
      O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
    5. Re:Trash-80 by IntlHarvester · · Score: 2

      Zilog's Z80 branding referred to the fact it was an enhanced clone of the Intel 8080.

      But mostly people thought adding "80" to stuff sounded super futuristic in the 1970s. You'd see on all sorts of random electronics, and there was a semi-famous disco studio called "Sound-80".

      And the OP is correct, "Trash-80" was definitely a term of endearment among the owners.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    6. Re:Trash-80 by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Tandy no longer exists, having been re-badged by Woolworths as Dick Smith a few years back.

    7. Re:Trash-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, people are always hard on the poor Radio Shack clerks, but it's really important to note that these guys are essentially paid minimum wage. If they are in a high traffic store, they might make commission, but that's only a handful of stores per districts. You're not going to get any engineers working there for what they pay.

    8. Re:Trash-80 by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      There are a few Tandy branded stores in Melbourne but they feel like a cheap goods outlet for DSE.

    9. Re:Trash-80 by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      They don't do that at my local Rat Shack. In fact, I may be lucky enough that I live in such an out of the way area, that this one still caries DIY radio/astronomy kits, PCBs, etc. along with the normal craptastic RS stuff like over-priced phones and crappy USB headsets.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    10. Re:Trash-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started to appreciate Radio Shack more after I got an Arduino. Where else can you pick up hobbyist electronic parts like diodes, capacitors, resistors? Online, sure, but even there the selection tends to be spotty because these parts are neither high margin nor high volume.

      So no more dissing Radio Shack from me, at least for awhile.

  9. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    TRS-80 Mod 1, Apple ][, then ZX-81 here. It was a great intro as a kid to Basic, several assembly languages, Forth, etc. I still apply a lot of the lessons learned in writing maintainable (or not) code from those first machines and languages.

  10. A historian I hope by sjbe · · Score: 2

    ...one of the key players in the still suprisingly active community for the TRS-80 Model 100 portable computer.

    Reminds me of the episode of the Simpsons where Burns says "have I missed the 4:30 autogyro to Siam?"

  11. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... / HP 200LX by neurocutie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    well the Pocket PCs such as the HP 100/200LX had CGA screen with full 80x25 text and graphics and could run for at least 30 hours, with almost any DOS program you wish, include TCP clients (browsers, telnet, ftp, etc).

  12. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    My trs-80 has a serial number below 250. Not sure exactly what the number is though, I'd have to dig it out of my dad's attic 2000 miles from here to check.

    --
    This space available.
  13. Emulator by Omineca · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a link to the emulator: http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtualt/

    1. Re:Emulator by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      that emulator is incomplete. It does not emulate the keys getting stuck.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Emulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. No "free battery club" card either :(

  14. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    Model 1, neglected to say. There's also a model 4p up there. And a vectrex with all accessories and carts.

    Obsolete tech museum.

    I sold my model 100 and model 102 a few years back.

    --
    This space available.
  15. Lenovo X220 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    23 hours , as long as you use the "slice battery"

  16. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... / HP 200LX by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    On my last DOS machine it was easier to just dial into the local freenet and use links/elinks and the other *nix utilities...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  17. Ah, memories... by bhlowe · · Score: 1

    Used a model 1 briefly (a few weekends when I could borrow it from school) but fell in love with the CoCo. Ah, good stuff....

  18. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thank you for illustrating that you don't know what a TRS-80 Model 100 is.

    Hint: it's not a desktop.

  19. The Z-80 CPU is still in many new products. by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    Retro video game fans know this CPU well but it's still being sold in brand new products with new software being targeted for it.

    I use a Z-80 every day in my so-called car MP4 player. These are cheap car FM transmitter players that are easily found on eBay for a measly six bucks. They're so cheap I hand them out at Christmas to anyone who wants one.

    The knock off second generation iPod Nanos are based on the same thing. Those are like twenty bucks because they have the battery and a bit more hassle than they're worth but what is cool in a geeky sort of way about these two products together is that since they both use the Z-80, they both use the same video compression format. It does work to play videos and the open source package works fine on Linux.

    1. Re:The Z-80 CPU is still in many new products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except the TRS-80 Model 100 used an Intel 80C85

  20. Yep! by PotatoHead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80_Model_100

    You can see many of his early ideas in how the thing operates.

  21. Don't laugh *too* hard by hawk · · Score: 2

    There *are* we servers running on model 100s out there.

    They don't serve much, but they exist.

    hawk

    1. Re:Don't laugh *too* hard by OakDragon · · Score: 3, Informative
    2. Re:Don't laugh *too* hard by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      There *are* we servers running on model 100s out there.

      There are ??

      Wow !!

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  22. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

    Apple ][, then ZX-81 here.

    Ouch. What happened?

  23. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    "And a vectrex with all accessories and carts."

    You do know those things are really rare to come along?

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  24. Retail price? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    What was the original price on one of these? How did it compare to its competitors? By competitors I mean other computers of the time, as this was obviously the first portable. What sort of premium did you have to pay for portability?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Retail price? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      They were expensive. In the EEvBlog teardown video, David Jones says they were north of $1400 USD, depending on options. That was about the same price as a 48K Apple II+ with floppy drive and monitor, so the Model 100 customers obviously paid a real premium for the form factor.

      This thing is more like the ancestor of the iPad than the ancestor of a general-purpose Windows or Mac laptop, IMO.

    2. Re:Retail price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't that much. The cheap ones were around $800 new. That wasn't chump change for the time, but it also wasn't a backbreaking price, either.

    3. Re:Retail price? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I bought one of the 8K units in 1984, and it was $800....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    4. Re:Retail price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you believe in the CPI numbers then http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=800&year1=1984&year2=2012 says:

      That would be $1,766.25 in 2012 dollars. You can get a pretty decent Airbook for that.

  25. Ran on nicads, too by hawk · · Score: 1

    I used to run mine on nicads. I think I got 4 or 6 hours: I forget.

    Many folks carved space and jerry-rigged a fifth battery to get 6 volts; I ran on just 4--which gave me longer battery life than on the correct voltage (with that type of CMOS, current dissipation was proportional to voltage).

    It never occurred to me before, but it likely would have run on 4.5v from three alkalines, and boosted battery life. I'm not likely to put enough hours on ever again to ever find out . . .

    However, when the low pow light came on, instead of 20 minutes, yu had 20 seconds . . .

    hawk

    1. Re:Ran on nicads, too by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      My uncle had his rigged similarly to what you described, only he didn't worry too much about the low-power bit - he had rigged a switch and a second bank of batteries to automatically flip on when power went low. This gave him time to replace the first batch and keep working.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  26. I wonder by gman003 · · Score: 2

    Battery technology has gotten much better, as well as tricks to lower power consumption. I wonder what sort of battery life you'd get if you took the same basic design, die-shrunk the chips to 32nm to lower the voltage, and used a large monolithic Lithium-Ion battery instead of a pack of AAs. Maybe add some dynamic frequency scaling, if that would get you anything.

    I would not be surprised if you got a battery life measured in weeks.

    1. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of the power consumption would be in the display, if you're talking about applications like word processing. I work with 8-bit microcontrollers all the time, and it's not hard to get one down to 1 mA at low clock speeds or when it's spending most of its time idle, waiting for input. I think 5-10 mA for a display is reasonable. A set of 4 AA batteries could probably manage about a month.

    2. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like the kind of battery life an e-reader gets these days...

    3. Re:I wonder by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      A very important trick for low-current devices is what the Palm Pilot did. It ran on two AAA batteries but it would suck them down to less than 1 volt each. How did it manage such a feat? Well, the key was a DC voltage converter that would take the battery voltage and output 3.3V to run the device. It eliminated the regulators and such completely and it would operate down to something less than 2V from the batteries.

      This resulted in a battery life of around 3-4 weeks with a lot of usage. Sure, the display was 4-level monochrome with a green electroluminescent backlight - very, very low current - but it got the job done. The impressive thing is that similar devices, using the same batteries, would get anywhere from a few days to a week of battery life. I used to joke that if you held the Casio (maybe it was an A-11) up to your ear you could hear a whistling sound - the sound of the batteries being sucked dry.

      I am not sure if this would work with current rechargable batteries as most of them drop rather suddenly from 1.2V per cell to about zero in the span of minutes. The slow taper down of battery voltage is a thing of the past.

    4. Re:I wonder by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I think the 100 didn't have a backlit display, so the display shouldn't draw much power at all.

      This was possible because its display was little better than the 7-segment mono LCD you'd see in an early digital watch, and those work well with reflected light.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  27. McDonald's ? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    Unless my memory is playing tricks on me, Weren't those used at McDonald's behind the counters ?

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    1. Re:McDonald's ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely. It's possible that IBM PC's (or compatibles made from one of many manufacturers, including Tandy) were, though. For many years, one of the most popular business applications for the IBM PC was the 3270 terminal emulator for communication with an IBM mainframe. In essence, the powerful personal computer was used as an emulation of a dumb terminal that painted characters sent to it from across the network and, in turn, relayed keystrokes pressed by the user.

    2. Re:McDonald's ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McDonalds used or may still use SCO Xenix. Low end x86 unix from microsoft back in the early 1980s before they invested in DOS and IBM compatibles.

  28. Easy by sjbe · · Score: 1

    However, go find me a COMPUTER that has a battery life of half a work week , running off the kind of batteries I'd find at Wal-Mart or 7-11. It has to be a complete, self-reliant computer - I should be able to not just install any program I want, but *write* any program I can write, all without needing any other computer.

    Ok, I've got a HP calculator in my desk drawer that roughly fit that description and are VASTLY more powerful than the model 100.

    The problem isn't making a computer that does what you are talking about. The problem is making one you'd actually want to use for more than extremely limited uses. We don't make general purpose computers like the model 100 anymore because we don't have to and because people don't want them, not because we couldn't. We could easily create a device today that outpeforms the model 100 for a narrow range of tasks.

    1. Re:Easy by spookthesunset · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but this is slashdot... home of the luddite. Everything was perfect back in 1970 when computers were more useful, less bloated, and (clearly) more open.

    2. Re:Easy by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you posit, essentially, that the M100 was succeeded not by laptop computers, but by handheld calculators?

      That's interesting, and maybe even a bit true. The only thing they can't really do is communication - the most my old TI could do was a VERY rudimentary device-device or device-computer link. All that's really needed is a high-end calculator with either WiFi or Bluetooth, or perhaps some USB-type connection (able to function as both host and device - is there a standard for that already?).

    3. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but this is slashdot... home of the luddite. Everything was perfect back in 1970 when computers were more useful, less bloated, and (clearly) more open.

      Yes, but now we can use them for porn.

  29. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... / HP 200LX by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

    Those HP palmtops were interesting machines. At one job, a Finance Director would carry one around and whip it out if he wanted to do some quick calculations using the built-in Lotus 123. I think they may have been largely forgotten because this was about the time when 'everyone' started using Windows & Excel.

    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  30. TRS-80, that brings back not-so-good memory by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0

    There were stuffs that brought back really good memory, but not the trash-80s

    Of course, we read all the manuals and hand-coded some programs, but I didn't put in too much time for it, for there are other machines that offered much more flexibility and robustness

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:TRS-80, that brings back not-so-good memory by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey what was wrong with the Trash 80? Not everybody had Apple money back then ya know. I had both the Trash and the VIC (Remember the Shatner commercial, complete with beam in?) and frankly they were great little machines for the time. Sure they weren't that powerful but then again a $10 cell phone is more powerful than the biggest computers were back then.

      I think we would all do good to remember that the Trash, VIC, C64, BBC Micro and Sinclair changed a lot of folks lives and gave them a lifetime love of computing. Just think how different the world would be if those little guys never came out? if the only computers for sale in the 80s cost thousands of dollars? it would probably be a lot more empty place, with a lot less programs, tinkering, and DIYers out there.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:TRS-80, that brings back not-so-good memory by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 2

      I think we would all do good to remember that the Trash, VIC, C64, BBC Micro and Sinclair changed a lot of folks lives and gave them a lifetime love of computing. Just think how different the world would be if those little guys never came out? if the only computers for sale in the 80s cost thousands of dollars? it would probably be a lot more empty place, with a lot less programs, tinkering, and DIYers out there.

      Indeed!

      I managed to get my father to buy a $99.00 Vic from K-Mart back in the day, and it was a godsend. What was kind of funny is that for my birthday or Christmas, he'd buy me a cartridge for it (yes, like everybody I had the requisite Omega Race and Gorf.. both excellent), but I kept trying to explain to him what I really wanted was a datasette and a programmer's reference manual (a memory expansion was in the wildest dreams category). I never got either, and like many of us learned by playing with BASIC, figuring out that it was far too slow for games, then POKEing in machine code using magazines and the users's guide it came with to assemble some sort of memory map. Then the little sister would come alone and touch something (or my RTS didn't work out) and *poof* all gone. Wrote my first bubble sort on that machine.

      By the time I was old enough to get a part time job I ended up buying a new Atari 130XE and a second hand 1050 drive off of some kid who was upgrading to the (then) very new Atari ST.

      I would trade those experiences for NOTHING.

    3. Re:TRS-80, that brings back not-so-good memory by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Exactly! my first real taste of computing was tweaking accounting programs for my dad on a Trash and being able to get magazines and actually understand the guts really helped me to appreciate the wonders of those little guys, so I asked for and got a VIC for Xmas the year they came out (1982? God it was so long ago. thank the Federation for the Shat commercial because my mom was a Sci/Fi lover and that swayed her) and a lifetime love of computing was born.

      While others sat there staring at their NES and SNES I went from the VIC to a C64 to getting a steal on an IBM that was running the original OS/2, I went through a good dozen OSes, probably just as many different kinds of CPUs (I even had a Cyrix and a WinChip for awhile, remember those?) and through it all had a blast and it can all be traced back to the Trash and the VIC giving me something I could actually control and manipulate instead of blinding consuming.

      so lets give credit where credit is due and celebrate the little guys of computing. sadly it looks like we are gonna get to see what happens when the little guys don't exist as the rise of locked down pads and phones seems to be creating a whole generation of little consumers, that all just take what they get without question and have no desire to know anything about it or how it works. As much as I'd enjoy being 20 again I really wouldn't trade my experiences for theirs, their tech may be more powerful but they have zero control.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:TRS-80, that brings back not-so-good memory by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 1

      As much as I'd enjoy being 20 again I really wouldn't trade my experiences for theirs, their tech may be more powerful but they have zero control.

      Word, brother!

  31. Re:Nostalgia by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    Scriptsit was DA BOMB back in the day, just like VisiCalc was for an Apple spreadsheet.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  32. Good times... by evil_aaronm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Model 100 came out about the time I turned 18 and got an inheritance from my grand-father's estate. It was about five thousand bucks. Money was really tight and my new wife and I went round after round "discussing" whether it was more important that I get one of these devices or pay for something more "realistic" like things for the baby soon to arrive. I got one, but it wasn't pleasant. I still remember driving home from RS - had my wife drive so I could play with it - and being utterly enthralled with my new purchase.

    Yes, the money probably could've been spent more prudently, but that computer helped launch my career in technology which has been, for the most part, very rewarding - my wife's not complaining about money, at least. After nearly 30 years, my wife doesn't argue so much about what I buy, my son has grown up and is doing just fine on his own, and my Model 100 is on the shelf right behind me. Still works, just like the day I got it.

    1. Re:Good times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ugh. vague pronouns and trolls are a bad combination.

    2. Re:Good times... by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2

      Nah, dude, I paid list. The rest I used to have Van Halen play at my birthday bash. It was awesome! /Iwish

  33. Re:Nostalgia by GrahamCox · · Score: 0

    So which one am I thinking of then? It was a TRS-80, it had an integrated monitor and floppy drives and it was "portable", in that it had a foldout keyboard which when closed covered the screen. It had a carry handle. I wouldn't call it portable in the modern sense, but it was portable in the sense that it meant in 1984 - you could tote it around, take it home, etc.

  34. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... / HP 200LX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They still sell on eBay for about their original retail price (several hundred dollars), even though a new one hasn't been made for over a decade. They really were cool machines at the time. An MS-DOS computer, in your hand? Amazing. I had a professor use one as a demonstration for an operating systems class.

  35. Re:Nostalgia by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1
    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  36. Olivetti M10 by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    I have an Olivetti M10, which is exactly identical to the TRS-80 100, apart for the obvious (the logo).

    No laptop has ever had such decadent keyboard as this wee little machine. A joy to use.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  37. Mrs Slocombe by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    No laptop has ever had such decadent keyboard

    People who think that a long word is just a more fancy synonym for a similar but shorter word come across as utterance idiolects.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  38. Scott Oki had one by Ian.Waring · · Score: 2

    I recall Microsofts International VP, Scott Oki, tapping away on his Model 100 when he visited us at DEC in 1983. I had the privilege of taking Paul Maritz, now of VMware, into seeing my CEO in 2011, and while waiting for my CEO, got chatting about iPads. I mentioned Scott Oki, and he said he remembered Scott going everywhere with that Tandy TRS 80 Model 100. Wasn't it actually made by Kyocera?

  39. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by Briareos · · Score: 1

    Ha. My Atari 800XL was released in late 1983, so I'm safe for another year...

    Nah, just kidding - I'm feeling old just the same.

    np: Public Image Ltd. - U.S.L.S. 1 (9)

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  40. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Ha. My Atari 800XL was released in late 1983, so I'm safe for another year...

    Yeah, but that doesn't really count, as it was essentially just an improved version of the Atari 800 which came out in 1979 :-)

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  41. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    The Apple was at school. I bought the ZX-81 myself, and still have it as well.

  42. Re:Actually, ALL big-name home pc's are 30 years o by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 1

    All the big-names are 30 years old just now.

    This includes the TRS80 Color computer (The computer that got me into this crazy field in the first place... OS9 for ever!)

    I have to admit, I had my Atari 130XE running Spartados when I ran into a Coco running OS9 and was pretty much incredulous (and humbled).

    Nowadays companies like Cloud 9 and projects like NitrOS-9 are keeping the fun alive.
    If time weren't so damned finite I'd love to pick up a Coco 3 and pop a 6309 into and get busy.. alas real life intrudes.

  43. Re:Sad state of modern technology ... / HP 200LX by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    The Psion Series 3/3a/3c had similar specs to the HP palmtops, but they weren't crippled by running DOS. EPOC16 (which later evolved into Symbian) ran a multitasking GUI in 256KB of RAM, which was also used as a RAM disk. My 3 had a spreadsheet on an SSD, but the 3A and later came with it built in. There's a DOS-based 3A emulator that runs nicely in DOSBox floating around.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  44. Last Software Written By Bill Gates by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

    This was my first computer! I spent $1,000 on it. It was awesome and I still have it. I'm sure if I popped some fresh batteries in it it would still work. The funny thing is I'm betting Bill Gates also wrote the manual which was famously a mess with references to non-existent sections. Still, this got me into software development. I remember I had a tape-backup drive that I used to store off programs and after I had been storing them on tape for a long while I noticed that I had a variable-speed tape player and I was never able to recover a dang thing from tape. Still, I loved this and eventually got a floppy disk drive for it that would store 250K. Still have all that in a bin.

  45. Re:We don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, the guts are nothing to write home about, but can you imagine a modern version of this with an ARM SoC, GNU/Linux, an e-ink screen, USB, and ethernet? That would still rock pretty damn hard.

  46. Wow- I still have mine by no1home · · Score: 1

    I started way back when with the ZX81, joined with a TS1000. We moved up to the TRS80 models 2-4, then their PC-type Tandy 1000 series. But the TRS80-100 was great. That was something I could lug to school and show off with. I even (OK, this is hard to admit) built programs to help run role-playing games- things like time to distance at various warp speeds for real stars in our galaxy, tracking various character issues, etc.

    I don't use it for much any more. I'm not that kind of hobbyist, I guess. I do have it ready for use when I want to send messages over the ham frequencies. It's part of my emergency kit. I'm proud to say that it isn't some novelty item for me, but still a useful tool. I still love this thing.

    --
    I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

    Persecutors will be violated!
    1. Re:Wow- I still have mine by no1home · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I still have the manual! It's all in good shape. :D

      --
      I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

      Persecutors will be violated!
  47. Teardown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://youtu.be/Prl6D7bqQo8

  48. Re:Nostalgia by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

    Maybe the model 200?

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  49. Re:Nostalgia by jhoger · · Score: 1

    Maybe you're thinking of the TRS-80 Model 4P: http://www.obsoletecomputermuseum.org/trs80_4p/