Slashdot Mirror


Paralyzed Woman Uses Mind-Controlled Robot Arm

MrSeb writes "Using BrainGate, the world's most advanced brain-computer interface, a woman with quadriplegia has used a mind-controlled robot arm to serve herself coffee — an act she hasn't been able to perform for 15 years. BrainGate, which is being developed by a team of American neuroscientists from Brown and Stanford universities, and is currently undergoing clinical trial, requires a computer chip to be implanted in the motor cortex of the patient, which it then transmits to a computer for processing. Like all brain-computer interfaces, the user must train the software — but once this is done, you simply think of a movement, and the software moves the robot accordingly. Moving forward, the researchers would like to miniaturize the system and make it wireless — at the moment, BrainGate users have a box attached to their head, and they're tethered to a computer — which is OK for robot arm use at home, but obviously doesn't grant much mobility. The work was partly funded by DARPA, with the hope of creating more advanced prosthetics for wounded war veterans." This comes on the heels of a 71-year-old man regaining motor function in his fingers after doctors rewired his nerves to bypass the damaged ones.

43 comments

  1. Hollywood taught me this! by durrr · · Score: 2, Funny

    This will end with a mind controlling robot army.

    1. Re:Hollywood taught me this! by durrr · · Score: 1

      Though seriously, this was done in monkeys a long time ago, it's about fucking time it happens for humans.

      Now we just need to take it a few steps further, and use a larger implant to get more bandwidth and from different regions, and implant it in healthy academics to computer-enchance their intellectual capacity in order to establish a self-reinforcing feedback loop.

      And if someone bothered to get that fucking optogenetics-for-humans-project off the fucking ground that would be splendid.

    2. Re:Hollywood taught me this! by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Why don't you do that?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Hollywood taught me this! by durrr · · Score: 1

      Because I still have three years left of medschool. But yeah sure, if it isn't solved after that I may put it on my achivement list second to paying of my student loans.

    4. Re:Hollywood taught me this! by geekoid · · Score: 0

      OK, you want to do other things, but then you give an attitude that no one else will make the time.

      Why not start a company and do that. Use that to make your money to pay your loans.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Hollywood taught me this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may put it on my achivement list

      Does this list include learning to spell?

    6. Re:Hollywood taught me this! by skids · · Score: 1

      Though seriously, this was done in monkeys a long time ago, it's about fucking time it happens for humans.

      Well, had they picked a more decent FA to link you might have noticed that this actually is a report of results from a year ago, and moreover a major point of this study was to investigate brain implants that last a long time. That neurotransciever had been in her head for five years. The news here is that it still worked (and the publication of the study, where they describe the various components.)

    7. Re:Hollywood taught me this! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He's going to be a doctor, with their handwriting it doesn't really matter.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Hollywood taught me this! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Now we just need to take it a few steps further, and use a larger implant to get more bandwidth and from different regions, and implant it in healthy academics to computer-enchance their intellectual capacity in order to establish a self-reinforcing feedback loop.

      Did I just get wooshed?

  2. She Never Asked For This by IndigoParadox · · Score: 2

    "The work was partly funded by DARPA, with the hope of creating more advanced prosthetics for wounded war veterans."

    Yeah, sure, that's what it's for, Mr. Sarin.

  3. braingate2 by itamihn · · Score: 2

    "Moving forward, the researchers would like to miniaturize the system and make it wireless"

    And that is the purpose of Braingate2: http://www.braingate2.org/

    1. Re:braingate2 by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      [insert get-haxored-stop-punching-yourself jokes here]

      would be great to find a whistle in your cereal box that can make people's robotic arms slap themselves. or hand you money.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  4. Re:TO WORK HER DILDO I BET !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt she has any feeling in her cooch, jackass.

  5. Cyberpunk... by Kergan · · Score: 1

    Maybe the 80s cyberpunk authors weren't so off the mark, between the economic recession (depression?) and this kind of medical/cybernetic development...

  6. 20+ years ago... by Brad1138 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    20+ years ago, I saw an episode of a show "Beyond 2000". They had someone hooked up to electrodes of some sort, there was nothing implanted. She was controlling an avatar, in first person, in a 3D environment with her thoughts. I always thought if we could do that 20 years ago why, has it taken so long to see anything more. Even now, this really isn't any more impressive. If we could even control a mouse pointer and "click" with our mind it could be very useful. It wouldn't be much more to then be able to text with our minds, which then opens up a form of telepathy.

    I just wonder why this tech seems to have been stuck in its tracks for so long.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:20+ years ago... by virgnarus · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a lot of obstacles that need to be overcome that would ultimately explain the slow progression. First of all, the brain is still being understood, and continues to surprise scientists with how it operates. In addition to this, you also have the deal with the body's reaction to invasive brain implants like this one, which they are attempting to avoid through use of more bio-friendly materials to substitute the gold and silicon. There's a lot of studies being conducted on attempting to workaround this through less invasive or noninvasive interfaces (like the consumer brand Emotiv product), but signal output at these levels is very noisy and vague. Don't forget that research is fragmented on this as there's several ways to achieve the same goal, such as either a replacement limbs that moves on neural stimuli, or the use of an external robotic arm as seen here.

      Intel is now just getting serious about putting heavy money towards brain interface research, so it's good a big microchip computer like them are putting their vested interest in this, and that will indeed expedite the process, but there's just so much that's still left to be learned and all of it must come together in an affordable package. It's no different than quantum computers - researchers are learning more on the mechanics behind it while at the same time creating working products on what they've learned so far. Things are going to start rudimentary, yes, but one needs to be positive on this that there's actually progress being done.

    2. Re:20+ years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know what you mean. lazy ass shit scientisits.....

    3. Re:20+ years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classic fallacy - because it's easy for humans to do mostly without thinking, it should be easy to design a computerized system to do it. Same thing happened with machine translation and the computer vision problem. They thought it would be easy, but it turns out to be really hard.

      In 1954, they thought that machine translation would be a "solved problem" within 3-5 years (lmfao!): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_machine_translation

    4. Re:20+ years ago... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In 1954, they thought that machine translation would be a "solved problem" within 3-5 years (lmfao!): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_machine_translation

      They were right.

      In 3 to 5 years it will be ...drrrrTISH.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. Didn't "Surrogates" start this way? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Just sayin'....

    1. Re:Didn't "Surrogates" start this way? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The thing is, they had a utopian society in that movie. I'd like my own surrogate! Bungee jumping without the bungee? Parachuting without fear of death or disability? Sounds good to me. Willis only destroyed the surrogates because his wife was a crazy bitch, and so was he.

      Odd how I never heard of that movie until I saw it at WalMart.

  8. Money wasted on decades old approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    35 year old work, rehashed because "it's got a computer!!!" The technology has never worked well because electrodes, whether the myocardial skin electrodes or the implanted ones of this new technology, wind up getting a tremendous amount of electrical noise from the area of the elctrode, and the noise is from similar signal electrode signals. To sort out the valid signals from all the noise takes about half a second: digital sampling does not help this, and is in fact counterproductive because it adds its own noise and makes the system take much more power.

    You can write a lot more papers and get more people excited by your "computer control", a low pass filter with an adjustable gain does a much better job with much less power consumption and much less error, and this has been true since the invention of the Boston Arm. Now, if they'd invented a new electrode technology, I'd be much more excited. But this is a rehash of decades, even centuries old work (Look up Voltaire hearing sounds from putting an electrode in his mouth and one in his ear: the electrodes really haven't gotten much better.)

  9. That's a long wait for coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15 years without a coffee? She's going to be bouncing off the walls after that cup!

  10. Well it ain't... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Star Wars, but I guess baby steps are better than no steps.

  11. All smiles here by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    During the early tests of this device one technician was knocked unconscious after repeatedly urging her to shout "Hand, pick up the ball!"

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  12. Progress... by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

    What year is it now? 2012? Hmm...this looks promising, but not quite what I want yet. Wake me up when I can have Doc Ock-like arms attached to me that will function in the obvious intended way (like extra natural arms).

    *back into cryogenic stasis*

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  13. Definitely Watch the Video by IonOtter · · Score: 2

    As it says in the article, it's totally worth seeing the look on her face.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  14. Funded by DARPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The work was partly funded by DARPA, with the hope of creating more advanced prosthetics for wounded war veterans

    They want to create cyborg soldiers

    1. Re:Funded by DARPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The work was partly funded by DARPA, with the hope of creating more advanced prosthetics for wounded war veterans

      They want to create cyborg soldiers

      That's crazy-talk. They just want to create soldiers that can mentally control armies of robotic soldiers.

  15. There's a great moment on the video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...right as the coffee hits her tongue she get the most uncontrollable smile. Brought a teary smile to my face.

  16. If I were a quadriplegic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would control the arm to pick up a gun and shoot myself!

  17. Techno hipster by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    I was serving myself free-trade coffee with a fixed-gear mind-controlled robotic arm BEFORE it was cool.

  18. One step closer... by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 1

    We all know what this research means... we are one step closer to creating Inspector Gadget.

  19. Re:TO WORK HER DILDO I BET !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe she likes it in the mouth but even if not would she rather have that cup of coffee or a fucking orgasm in the morning?

  20. Re:TO WORK HER DILDO I BET !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's a woman, so judging by my experience with them, she'd probably rather have the coffee. The orgasm is usually something she'll ask for to inconvenience you after a full day of inconveniencing you when the last thing you want to do is put in more effort on her.

  21. Re:TO WORK HER DILDO I BET !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fellow card-carrying member of the he-man-woman-haters club - welcome to slashdot - you are amongst friends.

    The captcha once again shows its got some tuning to do: vibrate - that should be, vibrator.

  22. The arm itself by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

    The arm itself was developed by the robotics and mechatronics department of German Aerospace Center (DLR) as explained by this article. The extremtech article fails to mention that.

  23. Obligatory reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new robot overlords.

  24. after the experiment she said by Covalent · · Score: 1

    We are the Borg...we are really thirsty ...we will drink your coffee ...resistance is futile.

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:after the experiment she said by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I am a 'borg, for real. I know other cyborgs IRL. Resistance is futile? When you need a cybernetic implant you'll not resist, you'll pay good money for it.

      Good attempt at humor, but "we are really thirsty" ruined the joke. Coffee doesn't quench your thirst. You should have said "we are really tired".

  25. This is only for women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you simply think of a movement, and the software moves the robot accordingly"

    and:

    "Men don't really think about sex 'every seven seconds' - just 19 times a day
    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2067542/Men-dont-think-sex-seven-seconds-rest-easy--idea-myth-researchers-found.html#ixzz1vDRlvaHi"

  26. Here Come The Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now when she spills scalding hot coffee on herself, she can sue someone else.