Slashdot Mirror


PadMapper Gets C&D From Craigslist Over Apartment Listing Maps

First time accepted submitter Autumnmist writes "Craigslist has sent a Cease and Desist to PadMapper, a site that does a mashup of Craigslist (as well as Rent.com, Apartments.com) apartment listings and Google Maps. Craigslist is great, but apartment hunting through Craigslist has always been a needle in a haystack proposition, because all apartments for an entire city area are shown in a giant list. PadMapper made Craigslist better by locating each listing on a Google Map of the area. From PadMapper: 'I recently received a Cease and Desist letter from Craigslist, and wasn't able to get a meeting or convince Craigslist's lawyer that PadMapper was beneficial to Craigslist and apartment hunters in general. They allow mobile apps to display their listings if you buy a license from them, but not websites."

140 comments

  1. Why only PadMapper? by t4ng* · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HousingMaps.com has been doing this for something like 5 years. I'm sure there are probably others like it too.

    1. Re:Why only PadMapper? by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      Maybe they did send a C & D to Housingmaps.com, but Housingmaps lawyer's told Craigslist to STFU. I don't think Craigslist has legal standing to stop others from doing similar things.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    2. Re:Why only PadMapper? by rgbrenner · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did you try using the two sites. HousingMaps has a link to craigslist on the front page, and when you click on a listing, it goes to craigslist.

      PadMapper has no links to craigslist, and when you click on a listing, they display the listing on their own site without (as far as I can tell) even a mention of where it came from.

      Go to a site, scrape everything and present it as your own? Enjoy the C&D.

      Seriously, it looks like PadMapper deserved it.

    3. Re:Why only PadMapper? by rgbrenner · · Score: 5, Informative

      I take part of my post back.. they do show the listing in a frame.. so if they had Craigslist's listing on there, it should be clear they are from craigslist

    4. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they show it in a frame, but keep their bar on the side to keep the visitor on their site.

    5. Re:Why only PadMapper? by t4ng* · · Score: 1

      PadMapper looks pretty much the same as HousingMaps, except that PM is connected to more rental sites than just CL. You click on a link and an overview of the listing is shown is a DIV along with a link to the original listing.

      I think rollingcalf has it right. PM just caved. There is little difference between what PM and HM are doing and what any blogger does when they summarize an article from another web site and post a link to the original. Craig's List has no legal standing.

    6. Re:Why only PadMapper? by TehDuffman · · Score: 1

      Cancelling out my mod point.

      Padmapper makes it pretty clear who's ad they are showing.

    7. Re:Why only PadMapper? by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Informative
      Unfortunately I am currently looking for an apartment and housingmaps doesn't seem to be a good substitute.

      I just pulled up the same area with the same price range as I was looking at yesterday in padmapper and housingmaps only shows two apartments for rent where padmapper was showing 30+ (and most of the padmapper results were craigslist based)

      --
      Bottles.
    8. Re:Why only PadMapper? by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      Found something else interesting too: A lot of PadMappers links are to PadLister, a competitor for Craigslist. The about page says:

      PadLister is the side of PadMapper that serves landlords and brokers. It aims to make it easier and less painful to find great tenants for your rental vacancies. It does this in a few ways.

      So not only are they displaying craigslist listings on a frame to keep visitors on the padmapper site, they are also a competitor.

    9. Re:Why only PadMapper? by beelsebob · · Score: 2

      Of course they do, the data on craigslist in © craigslist, they can tell you anything about what you do with it.

    10. Re:Why only PadMapper? by cdecoro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfortunately, HousingMaps doesn't work. If you compare the listings on HM vs those on CL, you will see that HM has only a small, and unclearly-defined, subset of those. In otherwords, it has a bug, and doesn't pull out all the listings. Moreover, it has very limited options for searching, and divides up filters by bizarre factors (for example, I can look for apartments under $750, or between $500 and $1000, but not under $1000.

      Unlike PadMapper, which was a site that actually tried to maintain a useful product, HousingMaps appears to have been only a one-off project by some coder looking for something to do (and to be clear, I give him credit for offering it to the world, but it's not the same as an actively developed project).

      This is a horrible action by Craigslist. If they don't want their site to be useful, that's fine. But the postings are the property of their posters, not of Craigslist. Presumably, the posters would be happy to have anyone in the world coming to those listings. It should be *their* intellectual property rights that are at issue, not those of the intermediary.

    11. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the data, they can tell you anything about what you do with it.

      The law doesn't see it that way. They just need to recharacterize it so it's not saying "this is craigslist data"

    12. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most sites use breakout scripts to deal with framers, but framing is generally considered bad practice and often illegal. C&D well deserved, IMHO.

    13. Re:Why only PadMapper? by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      Data is not copyrightable. The organization, and presentation of data can be copyrighted, and in some instances, the complete collection data can be. If PadMapper is simply pulling key data and rearranging it into a searchable database, CL has a difficult, and likely untenable, claim.

      IANAL

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    14. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the data in craigslist is not pure data, it's sometimes creatively (and sometimes not)- written ads for sales, which makes it no different from modern music lyrics in many respects.

    15. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Of course they do, the data on craigslist in © craigslist, they can tell you anything about what you do with it."

      No, you are quite wrong.

      As recently re-affirmed by the Federal Supreme Court, what is considered "tabular data" is not copyrightable.

      There was a case a few years ago, in which a small-town telephone directory company saw a big-name telephone directory company come to town and take over their business.

      Due to economies of scale, the smaller company could not compete on a cost basis. So what they did, was just use information from the bigger company in their own listings. The bigger company sued.

      Although this was already an established legal principle, it went all the way to the Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court re-affirmed: if it's FACTUAL DATA -- such as names, addresses, phone numberes, real-estate listings, etc. -- it is not covered by copyright and can be used and reproduced by anybody.

      The lesson to be learned here is that you don't want to spend a fortune tabulating data, unless your business model takes into account that if you publish it, others will use it too.

    16. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      But if you check the terms of service there is nothing about copyright assignment, so the copyright for posts will remain with the poster and CL has no grounds to object on that front.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    17. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of similar ones in the UK too, although mainly Gumtree scrapers: kangaroom.co.uk, cravify, nestoria etc etc.

    18. Re:Why only PadMapper? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      No, you are quite wrong.

      The fact that there is an argument about this is proof that the system is broken.

      What is "factual data"? What is "tabular data"? Is it factual to say that the chords to a famous song are C, F, G? Is it factual to say that there is a whole note of A followed by a half note of C# followed by...? How granular can those "facts" be before they comprise the actual song? The completely broken music publishing industry is an example of how this issue can become such a mess that the corporations suffer (a lot less sheet music is sold today) and the customers suffer (because it's a major pain in the ass to buy sheet music, and then you have to download some cockamamie applet that makes it so you can only print the downloaded sheet music once (and you can't print it to a file). Everybody suffers because an industry clings to an outmoded way of doing business. And now, ways of doing business can become outmoded almost immediately, thanks to technology.

      Interestingly, there is no free market solution to the problem of intellectual property. Because customers don't care who the data comes from. Further, the user isn't even the customer (there's probably an advertiser who's the real "customer") so you've got one of these third-party transactions that the Internet is so full of (just like old-fashioned TV!).

      Maybe, not everything that's worth something should be "own-able". Maybe not everything that's "sell-able" should be "own-able". And maybe information just can't be property any more and we have to all learn to live with that.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      What is "factual data"?

      It is actually fairly well-defined by the courts. While I do not pretend this is verbatim (I could look it up but I have other things to do), it is something like:

      "Factual data" consists of facts that anyone could discover on their own given due diligence, with no judgment, interpretation, or other value added by the author. Typically this consists of physical data, or public information about individuals or things."

      That is not exact, I promise. But they do have a pretty clear, and even reasonable, definition.

    20. Re:Why only PadMapper? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      "Factual data" consists of facts that anyone could discover on their own given due diligence, with no judgment, interpretation, or other value added by the author.

      OK, so your definition (or I should say, "the courts definition") means that sheet music is factual data.

      I could come up with a perfect transcription of a piece of music from a recording and reproduce it as sheet music. However, if I tried to share that sheet music on the internet, I would be sued, and I would lose. But I guess the original composer "added value" so then it can't be factual data. If I make a painting of a house, is that factual data? What if I were one of the hyper-realists and was trying to depict it perfectly? That cannot be factual data because the architect added value.

      And what does it mean to "discover on my own with no due diligence, no judgement, interpretation, value added, etc"?

      I guess this is why I couldn't hack it in a court room. Those words can be pretty slippery. For example, what does it mean to "discover something with no judgement"? Or "discover something with no interpretation"? Is that like finding a dime on the street? Or is the act of looking at the ground in case there's a dime there an act of judgement? And didn't I have to use my judgement to interpret the shiny silver object as being money so I would bend over and pick it up? Maybe I'm a little effed up from being out in the sun all day today, but I'm not getting "pretty clear" or even "reasonable" from that definition.

      So wait, I've got it: "Factual data" is like a meteor that hits you on the back of the head! Am I close?

      Intellectual property is a crime against nature.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:Why only PadMapper? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      OK, so your definition (or I should say, "the courts definition") means that sheet music is factual data.

      So what if is is? Sheet music (and other forms of music) is specifically covered by copyright legislation. Your slasdottish creative interpretation of a law you haven't even read doesn't take priority over legislation that refers specifically to copyright on musical works.

      Really, asking rhetorical questions about a law you've never read just because a slashdot article mentions it, and trying to use that as an argument against IP? How utterly specious.

    22. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm [as] certain [as I'll ever be] that pope is making the clear point that law can be as well defined as you would like to say it is, and whether it is or isn't, doesn't change the fact that we have to rely on how that law is to be interpreted given the circumstances. There are just too many variables and [is] too much volatility in that regard, even with the tradition of Common Law / Precedent. You very well have some salient points, but in the end, both of you two are arguing in favor of two non-existent extremes, while the nearest accurate extreme is that, as mentioned by other posters, IP Law is nearly-irreparably broken if it so depends on rulings like that of [The Honorable] Judge William Alsup in Oracle v Google and of [The Honorable] Judge Richard Posner in Apple v Google in order to tell patent trolls what they've all needed to hear for decades: to go fuck themselves. Apple may has well have lived up to their long-lived joke of attempting to patent the rectangle, and Oracle is just outright stupid for the sheer concept of attempting to enforce not only copyright but patent on an API, which is just one of many ways to interface with someone's library/program. The idea of not tolerating, hell encouraging, other developers and teams writing APIs to interface to your project is about as sane as expecting nobody to manufacture aftermarket car parts.

    23. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tl;dr All those definitions are flawed, whether they are clear-cut or not.

    24. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/may has/may as/g

    25. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      However, if I tried to share that sheet music on the internet, I would be sued, and I would lose.

      Maybe. In practice, guitar tab (a form of sheet music, really) sites have proliferated like rabbits since Harry Fox smashed OLGA with legal threats, and AFAIK the question of whether posting one's own by-ear transcription of a song is fair use has never been taken to court.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    26. Re:Why only PadMapper? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Maybe. In practice, guitar tab (a form of sheet music, really) sites have proliferated like rabbits since Harry Fox smashed OLGA with legal threats, and AFAIK the question of whether posting one's own by-ear transcription of a song is fair use has never been taken to court.

      Good point. And wikifonia stays up (though it seems under attack).

      But the question is are lead sheets and fake books the same as fully-arranged sheet music?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    27. Re:Why only PadMapper? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Really, asking rhetorical questions about a law you've never read just because a slashdot article mentions it

      I didn't ask my stupid questions because the slashdot article mentioned something, but because the parent commenter mentioned it.

      I say this as someone who made his living for his entire professional life (and still has income from) his "intellectual property": It's a bad system, and the more that is done to try to prop it up with increasingly draconian laws and enforcement, the worse it will be for everyone (especially the artists themselves).

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Craigslist has legal standing to stop others from doing similar things.

      Of course they do. The C&D says that PadMapper has violated Craigslist's terms of service and must therefore stop using Craigslist immediately. That is well within their right to do if they so choose. This is just about what Craigslist says you can and cannot do with the data they provide through their service. If you don't abide by that then Craigslist can say to GTFO.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    29. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      Craig's list surely is copyright able. Precisely because it constantly changes. Also Congress specifically included "database run sites" under copyright a few years back. Hence one slashdot post would be fair use, but the collection has its own copyright because somebody has to maintain it. Sports stats, musc charts, etc it's all affirmed to be locked down.

    30. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      Want ads posted Daily clearly wouldn't qualify as "just facts" if all you did was skim them from a site.

    31. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could go even further and adapt a book a little too faithfully

    32. Re:Why only PadMapper? by gstrickler · · Score: 2

      But they're not copying the site, nor even a major portion of it. They're extracting certain data and making it searchable, much like google and other search engines do, only they're taking only a specific subset of the data.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    33. Re:Why only PadMapper? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You could go even further and adapt a book a little too faithfully [coldbacon.com]

      Ah, you know my weakness.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:Why only PadMapper? by jthill · · Score: 1

      "Particular selection and arrangement". Notes can't be copyrighted. Particular selections and arrangements can be. Same with words, addresses, topographical data, what not. The selection and arrangement can't be mechanical, if there are parts that are, those parts can't be copyrighted either.

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    35. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL

      No shit.

      The content on Craigslist is absolutely copyrightable. It's all original content, not mathematical data. Pulling data and rearranging it into a database is called reproduction and derivation, both of which infringe on copyright.

    36. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And there is no right for Google to do so. That's why you can exclude the Google crawler from your site and sue them if they don't comply.

    37. Re:Why only PadMapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Factual data only covers the address, contact number, and price. The text of the listing, any photos, the selection and arrangement of which listings to put on offer, and all of that is not tabular.

      The lesson here is that scraping sites and reproducing the content is not a viable method of protecting yourself from infringement. If they were dumping the data and pulling the price, contact number/email, and location of the listings, they'd be fine. But if they're reproducing the descriptive text, the included photos, and the other elements of the Craigslist listing, they're liable.

      Put into context, you can look at the data in the big phone company's phonebook to build your own, but you can't just scan the phonebook into a PDF and redistribute that.

    38. Re:Why only PadMapper? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Particular selections and arrangements can be.

      So how can guitar tablature of songs (for example) be OK, but a lead sheet might not?

      It's kind of confusing, which I guess is the point, because it allows for scary lawyer letters to have their desired effect.

      I've gotten takedown notices for music that I composed and recorded and for which I owned all of the rights. And the international website (one of the biggest) complied with the takedown notice even though I provided sufficient proof of my ownership. Because the RIAA has lawyers that can make the people who own the website miserable.

      If you just look through the articles here on Slashdot with the tags "intellectual property" or "copyright" or "patents" or similar terms, you can only conclude that the system is broken, only helps a very very very few people (and the wrong people at that) and that thanks to the unlimited money in politics, there is no political will to fix the system.

      So I cannot blame anyone who simply decides to ignore the whole thing and who has no respect for the rights of intellectual property.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    39. Re:Why only PadMapper? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      If all they are using is the price, the location, a few details (house color, number of bathrooms, etc) and a link to the original posting, none of that is copyrightable unless they copy the descriptions word-for-word. If they are simply saving details into a database and presenting it in their own original layout, then copyright was not broken because everything they have shown you is factual data.

    40. Re:Why only PadMapper? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Sheet music is not something you can "discover", it is something you can "create". Factual data is something that is the same no matter how you express it.

      Take the following made-up-by-me copyrightable housing listing:
      "I am selling my green 2-bathroom house on 12345 main street for $500,000".

      If you were to copy-paste that onto another website, I (or slashdot if I had agreed to give them copyright) could sue you. If you extracted the DATA into a database (or some other data storage system like this:
      Color: green
      bathrooms: 2
      address: 12345 main streent
      price: $500,000

      Then I would NOT be able to sue you because everything there is a simple provable fact.

      Where it gets fun is that if you were to use an algorithm (or a basement full of writters) to take that factual data and reword it into something like:
      "There is a $500,000 house for sale at 12345 main street with 2 bathrooms and green exterior walls"
      and a 3rd website copied THAT word-for-word then technically YOU can sue THEM, but I can't because it contains YOUR creative content, not just facts/data.

    41. Re:Why only PadMapper? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That clarifies things a bit more.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of people doing stuff for free. If you want to do something, you should have to pay for it.

    1. Re:Good! by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Well, had you bothered to read before posting you'd notice that they would pay, if they were allowed to.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop breathing until you're paying someone for it... let me know how that works out for you...

    3. Re:Good! by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Normally I'm in agreement with this sentiment. But in this case Craigslist is asking its users to post its content. So why should *MY* posting be copyrighted by craigslist? I want to sell/rent my shit--whoever wants to scrape my listing and repost it is more than welcome.

    4. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can start by paying an idiot tax for your existence.

    5. Re:Good! by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Stop breathing until you're paying someone for it... let me know how that works out for you...

      We are already.

      We breathe out that nasty pollutant carbon dioxide that we are paying the EPA to regulate, and paying more for the things that those EPA regulations regulate as a consequence.

      I told people ~40 years ago that we'd end up paying the government to breathe if government size, scope, and power weren't limited.

      Sadly, I was right.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    6. Re:Good! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      So... just how much do you pay each month to breathe air?

    7. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spurious logic at its best. Are you going to rail against fiendish fluoridators of our precious drinking water next?

    8. Re:Good! by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Spurious logic at its best. Are you going to rail against fiendish fluoridators of our precious drinking water next?

      OK, so you've got...nothing.

      Thanks for playing.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    9. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So post it outside of Craigslist, too. It's your content, but it's Craigslist's service. They don't have to support your wide-dispersal wishes.

  3. Why bother? by SlowTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not only is this a major bummer for me, as I love using PadMapper, I don't see why craigslist would do this. Not only did it make craigslist apartment listings actually usable, but it must be driving a fair amount of traffic to them as well. Perhaps if craigslist was about to launch something similar I could understand, but I think we all know that is not going to happen.

    1. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, PadMapper makes searching for Craigslist apartments actually, well, possible and damn near enjoyable. I can understand if PadMapper was just stealing Craigslist postings, but in reality the site links to the Craigslist advert after only two clicks. Makes me wonder if the Craigslist team even tried to use PadMapper: if they did, I don't see how they would see it is anything other than a useful filter on their own site that _targets_ traffic (instead of randomly haphazard listings browsing) to their listings. The only logic I can see in this is what you mentioned - that Craigslist will release their own similar service. But my advice at that point is just to buy out padmapper and redirect it to their site and enjoy much faster API calls.

  4. Market Share Abuse, Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The more people using Craigslist the worse craigslist will abuse it's market share.
    No doubt if Craigslist was some how paid before hand, they wouldn't care to send their sharks.

    Best advice, people should convince their friends to stop using Craigslist and start using something else.

    1. Re:Market Share Abuse, Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pad mapper is owned by padlister, a competitor to Craigslist. Why should Craigslist let a competitor take their content without payment?

    2. Re:Market Share Abuse, Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is Craigslist abusing its market share? It is simply not letting competators scrape the site. Everyone does this. Google doesn't let Bing steel its search results. MapQuest doesn't let Google Maps scrape its maps. It seems there isn't a problem here. In the summary PadMapper listed two alternatives to Craigslist. If PadMapper really adds value then Craigslist will lose market share and the problem will fix itself. Craigslist isn't trying to be all things to everyone. It is tryting to be super simple to use and maintain. For something more complex go elsewhere.

    3. Re:Market Share Abuse, Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why should Craigslist let a competitor take their content without payment?

      Because it's not their content. If people didn't post ads, Craigslist would turn to an empty wasteland and disappear.

      This seems to be the standard method nowadays of monetizing a site in the "information economy." Get people to contribute stuff for free, then charge for admission or slap ads all over it.

      Remember Gracenote? They started out as CDDB, the free CD Database. People uploaded their CD track listings voluntarily so we could all benefit from mutual knowledge sharing. Then they starting charging us to access the information we provided them, about CDs they don't own the rights to.

      Greedy bastards to a man.

      (captcha: intubate)

    4. Re:Market Share Abuse, Nothing New by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      The more people using Craigslist the worse craigslist will abuse it's market share. No doubt if Craigslist was some how paid before hand, they wouldn't care to send their sharks.

      Best advice, people should convince their friends to stop using Craigslist and start using something else.

      I fully agree. Know how many times in my life I have looked at Craigslist? Once. Just out of curiosity to see what it looks like. I cannot believe that for a large number of people it is the only site they look at if they want to buy something. My favorites are the people who believe that they simply cannot get cheated on Craigslist and then when they do, they act completely stunned as if such was completely impossible to happen.

  5. Do they actually own a copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not being a craigslist user myself (wrong continent), do Craigslist actually own the copyright for the listings? My understanding is that when I put an ad in a paper, the paper might get copyrights to the typesetting (if they did that, ie, classifieds), but the actual content was mine and I'm effectively giving them reproduction rights to that ad.

    If this holds true on CL, the third party site wouldn't require a license to reproduce the content of the listings, only the formatting.

    Now, I've checked CL's TOU and frankly, it's just confused me more. It's saying that users grant CL the rights to reproduce and sublicense the content the users post, but then goes on to state that the user also gives them the right to pursue unauthorised copies. At no point does it actually say that the user has assigned the actual copyright to CL - which would put this is the same category as the Righthaven situation. IE, without the actual copyright, CL wouldn't have standing to sue.

    Any thoughts?

    1. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      It's not a copyright violation, it's a terms of use violation. RTFA.

      Craigslist is a business, albeit a non-profit one. It is not a government service or a birthright to all.

    2. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reason they can license the content is because of Copyright..

      So, it is about Copyright after all...

    3. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      Uh no, it is a tos violation. RTFA!!!!

    4. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Whether or not it's about copyright, the fact of the matter is that the PadMapper guy probably couldn't afford a lawyer even if he was in the right, so he just bowed out.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    5. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That someone is listing an apartment located at xxx on Craigslist is a fact and not subject to Copyright.

    6. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Informative

      TERMS. OF. USE. VIOLATION.

      Nowhere in that statement is anything to do with copyright, trademark, or patents.

      "If you want to use our service, you will not do the following..." - "Oh, you violated our agreement. Stop it."

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      But could padmapper even be bound by TOS?

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    8. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Comes down to whether TOS is binding. I think that until an explicit protocol forces you to read a TOS before using a service, TOS are not binding as the information is being publicly displayed prior to acceptance of the TOS.

      Using a site should not constitute acceptance of TOS. That's fairly close to entrapment if you ask me.

    9. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TERMS. OF. USE. VIOLATION.

      Which doesn't matter if there has been no agreement of the terms of use. One can use the site just fine without ever agreeing to anything. The data istelf is not copyrighted by craigslist.

    10. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which doesn't matter if there has been no agreement of the terms of use. One can use the site just fine without ever agreeing to anything. The data istelf is not copyrighted by craigslist.

      Are you dense? The use of a site implies intrinsic agreement to the terms of use.

    11. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    12. Re:Do they actually own a copyright? by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as civilian entrapment.

      If the infringing company was not aware of its violation, it is now, having posted the C&D letter...

  6. It like the 80's never ended in San Fran by hemp · · Score: 1

    Why is craigslist still stuck in the 80's with their user interface?

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    1. Re:It like the 80's never ended in San Fran by Ossifer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, why don't they have seven different competing nav bars and three layers of epilepsy-triggering flash ads?

      The plain text UI is *exactly* why CL is popular.

    2. Re:It like the 80's never ended in San Fran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cringe*.

      Don't call it "San Fran"

    3. Re:It like the 80's never ended in San Fran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah - call it Frisco because this will annoy them even more. (Writing this from "Man Jose")

    4. Re:It like the 80's never ended in San Fran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No no, it's just The City!

    5. Re:It like the 80's never ended in San Fran by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      Allow me to politely disagree. CL is popular for apartments because that's where the broker's list. It is a horrible search UI (want to find a place with a washer and dryer? There's no way to specify it is in the apartment, so you end up with listings with shared washer dryer's, washer dryer's on the same block, etc). Brokers in NYC regularly abuse the system, posting falsely under "by owner" and often hiding the broker fee they want to charge. (Even the broker fee disclosure varies significantly, from 1 month to 15% of the annual rent). Also, if you aren't searching in Manhattan, it is difficult to separate out listings by neighborhood, since broker's regularly toss in text of "nearby" neighborhoods. The final straw is all the broker's who put in hidden text, so no matter what you search for, their listings come up. It is a huge pain using craigslist to find an apartment, and they could fix the problem (while retaining a simple UI) in a few easy steps:


      1. Do not allow any embedded html other than "a" tags and images.
      2. Update the forms to allow postings to specify common amenities/features, and update search accordingly. (Dishwasher, Laundry in Unit, A/C, Floor, Neighborhood).
      3. Have a broker fee section, separated from application fee, so broker's must disclose precisely how much of a fee there is.
      4. Put text into ANY ad posted under "by owner" stating that brokers posting in this section agree to forgo any broker fee. Make that statement BOLD and on the ad itself, and every step up to the ad's submission, requiring broker's to explicitly acknowledge this. Remove the "broker fee" section, so if they post a fee apartment in the "by owner" section, they are failing to disclose the fee.

    6. Re:It like the 80's never ended in San Fran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you want to add a 's to a word - like broker - ask yourself: do I want to specify that something belongs to the broker? or do I want to say "broker is" ?

      This simple exercise will make it a couple seconds faster for everybody who has to stop for a moment while trying to figure out what you really mean.

    7. Re:It like the 80's never ended in San Fran by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can get all the functionality you ever wanted except distance search by using user javascript. I am using Craigslist Fusion to get more functionality. It's still not pretty but it sings and dances. I only use it on my multicore desktop, though, not on my subnotebooks.

      With that said, I really want distance search, and craigslist is actually designed to prevent it. The theory is that it will encourage local shopping. But if what I want isn't available here, then I'm still going to want to go get it from somewhere else, and I'm still going to look at other craigslists for it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Padmapper makes Craigslist useful!!! by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Padmapper is the first site I've ever seen that makes apartment hunting on Craigslist actually useful!!!!

    WTF?!?

    I'm looking for a house in a specific neighbourhood and it's absolutely impossible to do via Craigslist directly!!! If Craig offered a map, I would at least understand why they might issue a C&D, but seriously...

    Padmapper links directly into craigslist and displays the full-screen whenever you click on the listing. It's not like they're aggressively scraping content! It's just a searching service.

    This is terrible, Craigslist!! Terrible!

    1. Re:Padmapper makes Craigslist useful!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Padmapper does NOT link directly to Craigslist. They display it in a frame with their nav bar on the side

    2. Re:Padmapper makes Craigslist useful!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your relatively high ID and excessive use of exclamation marks would have me thinking you're shill, but you're right about craiglist being a bitch to use for apartment hunting.
       
      In the cities I've lived, craigslist is the only legitimate option for finding an apartment and yet it has absolutely no facility for geographic searching other than hoping the agents use neighborhood or area names in their listings -- and of course, plenty of agents use popular neighborhoods in their listing to generate hits for their listings in shitty neighborhoods. Keyword searching in general on there isn't very useful, because it's basically like 1999 days of people stuffing the right keywords into unrelated listings. They're so detached from the reality of apartment hunting that their default page always includes surrounding cities. Including the south bay and east bay in San Francisco listings makes about as much sense as including Pennsylvania in NYC listings.
       
      You also can't limit the number of bedrooms, which fills your results with extra bedrooms in worse areas or worse condition rather than the exact number you want. How fucking hard would it be to let people search for a particular number of bedrooms, and not that number+everything above it?

    3. Re:Padmapper makes Craigslist useful!!! by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Craigslist is the quintessential "worse is better" website. It's awful and underfeatured in so many ways, yet at its core it is usable and people flock to it.

  8. In the middle of apartment hunting right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck everything about this. I've been using padmapper to hunt for my first apartment in a city I've never lived in before. Thankfully I got a lot of my stuff over the past week, but what about new stuff? I'll say it again: fuck those useless craigslist pieces of shit.

  9. Change Your Domain, where sharks can't get reach. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the things craigslist tried to do on their "epic" war against bots is hunt down domains, sending the C&D and then getting the ICE to shutdown the site. The site-ops just changed their domain from .com to .net. Those guys are still up. So why not trying something similar, both the Doman and Server offshore.

    This really shows how much craigslist is a racket. And is now exploiting the courts to enforce their racket on user-contributed information.

  10. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whores

  11. What's the legal basis of C&D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If its copyright, then Craigslist is shit out of luck because its not a creative work.

  12. pad mapper is a great service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used padmapper quite a lot, I wonder what brought about the C&D. Perhaps their crawlers were a little more aggressive than is reasonable?

  13. Re:Wait by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 2

    Wait, are you serious?

    The volume of garage sales in major cities dropped substantially in recent years, according to a study I saw, most likely due to Craigslist (and to some extent, eBay).

    Classified advertising in most major newspapers declined by 90% or more, almost exclusively due to Craigslist.

    Most real estate listing services have gone to a free-to-view model because of (primarily) Craigslist. Most use car listing services have gone out of business or to a free-to-use model because of (presumably) Craigslist.

    Who the hell doesn't use Craigslist?

  14. What Do You Use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Craigslist is still around? Who the hell keeps using it?

    If not Craigslist then what do you use for free classified advertising?

    Last I checked, Craigslist was free/cheap classified ads with the largest user base/viewership of them all. Has this changed?

    1. Re:What Do You Use. by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      I use Kijiji. It's run by the same people who run eBay.

      Around Winnipeg Craigslist is, frankly, a waste of effort. Few advertisements and if there is one, it's on Kijiji too.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
  15. Just because you can doesnt' mean you should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is craigslist still stuck in the 80's with their user interface?

    Who says ?

    Just because everyone else has to use every single latest scripting language, technique, eye-candy, whatever doesn't mean it is actually useful.

    I can't tell you how many times I've tried clinking on a navigation link only to have some whiz-bangy thingy pop-up and block my mouse click - yeah no matter how you maneuvered your mouse, it triggered the pop-up and you were somewhere you didn't want to be.

    It's the typical thing that developers fall into time and time again: there's a language or platform feature and they need to use it somehow regardless of its necessity - just because it's a "Cool" thing to do.

  16. Why can't CL provide a map display? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Craigslist should provide this type of map interface for all of their listings. Garage sales, dating,... Why not?

  17. Re:Change Your Domain, where sharks can't get reac by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

    To be fair, it's free to post for many cases, so they make their money from ad revenue. If you scrape their site, you get the revenue not them. That's money out of their pocket.

    Most sites you can't just scrape... Isn't this basically the same thing we were just harping on FunnyJunk for doing to Web Comics sites? It's been like this for years now.

  18. Re:Wait by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    Rednecks. Put an ad up for a used car, and you won't believe the shit you see.

    I had an old beater up a few years ago, I'd been offered $800 in trade, but thought I could do better selling it myself. After a week of dealing with CL people, I just scrapped it for $300 - it was worth the loss just to not have to deal with them anymore.

    Seriously, who emails asking if the car has a fucking engine? Is that a factoid that is typically omitted as a sales tactic or something?

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  19. Re:Change Your Domain, where sharks can't get reac by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

    Craig's list would do this THEMSELVES but they would have to PAY GOOGLE to use Google Maps without properly handing over Ad Revenue and search data to Google.

    Effectively PaperMapper is doing free processing tI feed Google's search engine!

  20. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most on the whores are on Backpage now... And tnaboard.

  21. Craigslist Already Took Action.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you try using PadMapper now that goes to a post on Craigslist.. they'll give you a blank page (assumingly using just referrals to block it). If you open an incognito window in Chrome and you'll be able to get to it.

  22. Re:Wait by espiesp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like you're one of the idiots who posts an ad on craigslist and omits all of the information possible. It's not a newspaper ad limited to 20 words. You can actually tell me a little something about the car you're trying to sell.

    "Van for Sale" does not a good ad make.

    Tell me what works, what doesn't, what year it is, what brand it is, what model it is, how good the tires are, yes, whether it runs or not, how many miles. Don't omit pertinent facts and I won't have to email you to ask stupid questions. And yes, even if this is a $1000 beater. Take the 30 seconds to write a meaningful ad and take decent pictures and your stuff will sell in a reasonable amount of time with minimal hassle. Also use big words that confuse rednecks.

  23. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess how the ad looked:

    CAR FOR SALE

    CHEAP CHEAP!!! COME GET IT> AWESOME CAR ONLY $999.00

    DONT WAIT, YO U WANT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  24. Re:Change Your Domain, where sharks can't get reac by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

    Craigslist does NOT have advertising. Have you ever seen any advertising? Where is it?

    They make their money on Employment listings in major cities. That's what they charge for. It's the only thing they charge for.

    The rest of the site is provided for free, because its "the right thing to do", apparently.

  25. Craigslist wants to remain stuck in the past by JDG1980 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's unfortunate that Craigslist is the most popular wanted-ads site on the Internet, since they insist on remaining stuck in the past, and making it as hard as possible for people to access their content.

    Their obsession with "localism" and consistent refusal to implement an all-aread search feature (and consistent breaking of third-party sites which do this) is especially problematic. I collect electric fans from the 1980s, which often don't show up on eBay because people don't think they are worth anything, but commonly appear on Craigslist. An all-areas search would be extremely helpful, but every time one appears, Craigslist either threatens them or does something on their site to break it. If someone doesn't want to ship (I usually offer them extra money in addition to the actual shipping costs if they are willing to do so), that's fine, but it should be their choice, not Craigslist's.

    1. Re:Craigslist wants to remain stuck in the past by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      "Localism" benefit NO ONE.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Craigslist wants to remain stuck in the past by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "It's unfortunate that Craigslist is the most popular wanted-ads site on the Internet, since they insist on remaining stuck in the past, and making it as hard as possible for people to access their content."

      Others here have said the same thing, and it is difficult for me to express just how ridiculous this point of view is.

      Craiglslist is a "classified ad" service. Nothing more. You don't have a search function in your newspaper. Neither do you have much of one on Craigslist.

      Accept it for what it is, or don't use it. Do you have ANY idea how much trouble it would be for the Craigslist people to add specific data fields, and search functions on them? I do, since that's what I do for a living.

      If you want that kind of functionality, then go somewhere you can pay for it. Craigslist ain't it. The fact that many others use it to post real estate listings does not make your particular desires any more important to Craigslist, unless you feel like paying for them.

    3. Re:Craigslist wants to remain stuck in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most popular wanted-ads site on the Internet, since they insist on remaining stuck in the past

      Yeah totally man, it's annoying. You need to drop some knowledge up in here and show us how to do it right!

      Spend some time and create a mockup of how you think it should look then post it in a 'Show HN" submission on hacker news. Get some adsense love and then sit back and wait for everyone to forget about you. CL is popular because it works. Stop trying to stick your finger in the ass of every successful site on the internet "just because" and learn to do shit the easy way

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=dildo+for+sale+%2Bsite%3Acraigslist.org

    4. Re:Craigslist wants to remain stuck in the past by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

      Yep. They broke http://crazedlist.org/ but http://searchtempest.com/ appears to still work although it is only pulling in results from the last 7 days.

    5. Re:Craigslist wants to remain stuck in the past by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      No, CL is not popular because "it works." CL is popular because of network effects. They had first-mover advantage, and the resulting network effect was impossible to compete with.

      See eBay for another example of a ridiculously-broken user experience that nevertheless cannot be disrupted by a superior implementation alone.

    6. Re:Craigslist wants to remain stuck in the past by onepoint · · Score: 1

      only because they are first on the block does not mean that they own it. they just have some control at this time.

      so all I can say is build a better mouse trap ... look at back page, it's slightly better and they are growing... at the end of the day that's what they are trying to do.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  26. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Personally I don't like or use Craigslist, but I don't like or use classified ads either.
    I've not bought or sold any item or service using Craigslist or classified ads... ... I guess I haven't found the need.

  27. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, he's right, the people who respond to Craigslist ads are astoundingly retarded (or so bored they are desperate for human contact).

    Every time I've posted an ad, I've felt like this: http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/305567/Cinder+Block+Craigslist+Ad/

  28. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Who the hell doesn't use Craigslist?

    The Whole Wide World outside of US of A.

  29. C&D Letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Padmapper,

    Greetings! We see you have listings of our house content in your site. Because your site is awesome and benefit to our site, we have sent you a money order for $10000 as a Thank You for increasing business! Unfortunately our accountant accidentally sent you $15000 instead, Could you please wire back the $5000 over payment. You can keep the rest as a present from us!

    Sincerely,

    Craig S. List

  30. This makes CL housing useful! by fsterman · · Score: 1

    This is total fucking bullshit, CL hasn't evolved in it's basic user interaction since it began. PadMapper makes their service useful!

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  31. Re:Change Your Domain, where sharks can't get reac by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

    How does Padmapper "feed Google's search engine"?

    Or did you just make that up?

  32. Re:Change Your Domain, where sharks can't get reac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all data is user-generated and free to use, is there anything wrong with scraping that data and providing better information about the data ?

    Until there is a clear definition on what user-generated information can and can-not be used for, companies will continue exploit the data to their own benefit.

    Are there any rulings on the limit-of-use if that data is free ?

  33. Craigslist is stuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why; but they are *stuck*. It's admirable that they haven't gone nuts with AJAX and advertising; but they haven't worked on the things that really matter either.

    Real estate listings on there are a joke. It was useful a few years ago, but I watched it get swallowed up in a sea of spam. Real estate listings driven by brokers, in turn, became more open and dropped their requirements to register. MLS fragmentation by region is still a problem; but you can work around it.

    A few MLS listings will have errors such as listing trailer homes and condos as SFRs, but on CL you can't distinguish between the two even if you want. It's a real needle-haystack proposition looking at their ads. I hardly ever bother anymore.

    They need to do some serious work on the back-end, add some more fields in the DB, etc. It's not like they have no revenue at all. They need to use it more wisely.

    I think they're stuck between trying to "keept it real" and actually provide a useful service. I'd hate to see it die; because if it does then the AJAX infested ad-monkeys really take over the Internet, as if they hold on... Blam! BLAM! had to kill some monkeys there. Ok, gotta reload. Bye-now.

  34. CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it. by mr.dreadful · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm always amused when I see people, mostly web professionals, bitch about CraigsList.

    The VC and bizdev types hate CL because "CL is just leaving money on the table. They need to understand how to make a profit."

    Webdevs hate them because CL doesn't adopt whatever new design trend comes along, therefore CL "doesn't get UX", or webdevs hate them because of situations like this, where some webdev can't build his business off of someone else's platform.

    This, compadres, is why you don't take your business public. CL has a staff of less then 20 people, they make plenty of bank while at the same time staying true to their own ethos, whether you agree or not. And the consumers seem to be coming back over and over. And yes, I have heard many people say that this is because CL has been around so long, that they are the 500 lb Gorilla that will never be moved. Uhh, are we on the same Internet? Tell that to Yahoo, MySpace, etc etc.

    Here's a Wired article from 2009 that covers the exact topic of CL and site scraping. Maybe PadMapper should have read it first.

    Wired Interview with Craig Newmark

  35. Re:Wait by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's pretty much what the situation was. The ad stated that it was a Mazda 626 that had been owned by a smoker before me, had a falling roof liner and a few rust spots. Had six or seven photos posted, including one of the engine compartment. I listed the things I had replaced recently, including both sets of brakes and the tires. I had the mileage, the trim style, and the options listed (sunroof, power locks, that kind of stuff).

    As an example, a level of detail similar to this ad. I will admit, I didn't think to state explicitly that the vehicle ran, because I just thought that was assumed for a non-collectible car listed at $1500. Clearly this was an oversight on my part. But it probably wouldn't have mattered, because 3/4s of the calls I received asked me questions that were stated both in the title and the ad itself, like the mileage or the year. I honestly don't understand how those troglodytes were able to extract my phone number from the ad without any other relevant bits of data whatsoever.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  36. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm always amused when I see people, mostly web professionals, bitch about CraigsList.

    No, users bitch about Craigslist, because their site lacks distance search, and users want it. And yes, I know this is deliberate, and no, I don't agree that it makes sense. And therefore, if they won't permit scraping, they're assholes and I wish they would go the fuck away so that someone who will do a more functional site has a chance to get enough users to make it worthwhile.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  37. Facebook methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll probably just Facebook it: send C&D, implement the same idea on your own page. Or just buy the site.

  38. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No location based search REALLY doesn't make sense for apartments, as that is by far and away the most important attribute of a place.

    Hopefully this will result in people moving away from craigslist, and posting directly on padlister.com (padmappers own listing)

  39. Must be a recent policy by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    They shut down CraigZoom a few months back. It was a great aggregation site that made it possible to do multi-region searches. As far as I know, it's not possible with CraigsList, so essentially they eliminated a feature.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  40. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

    Um... I hate to tell you this, but ANYBODY is free to create a similar website, with any business model behind it that they want.

    Your argument doesn't hold water, because nobody else has built anything that beats them. Therefore, by simple logic, CL *is* what people want.

    Build it better, make a fortune. Nobody is stopping you. Until then, quitcher bitchin'.

  41. We need mandatory licensing like the British have by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    One of the things we need in the US is mandatory licensing and a commission that determines fair prices.

    Fair use isn't just about usable free stuff. All too often businesses will horde information and IP at unreasonable prices. Information which in the public interest should be available at a reasonable price.

    The public gives IP rights holders it's so called "right". The public does this theoretically because it's in the public's own best interest to promote things such as science, literature and art. But the public also deserves value from those it's gives a copyright or a patent and as such in no way it's it a contradiction for it to set fair pricing because without it the "right" holder could claim no income at all.

    Take patents. Should I be able to patent a medical procedure that will save lives? What if I said I wanted something unreasonable like a trillion dollars per treatment. The fundamental question is what is in the public's own interest! We should not allow information hoarders. We award creativity and achievement not hoarding.

  42. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you familiar with the term "network effect," by any chance?

  43. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    ANYBODY is free to create a similar website

    Great. How do you propose that they convince people to use their similar website now that craigslist has become a household word, and when people generally go straight there rather than trying to google for items in their area? Nine times out of ten if I see something interesting by googling craigslist the listing is already deleted by author by the time I get there, so search engines are no help anyway.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. Re:Wait by Raenex · · Score: 1

    As an example, a level of detail similar to this ad [craigslist.org]. I will admit, I didn't think to state explicitly that the vehicle ran, because I just thought that was assumed for a non-collectible car listed at $1500.

    How well a car runs is pretty damn important -- you wouldn't believe the crap people try to sell for $1,500 that doesn't run. When I sold my car on Craigslist I explicitly stated how well it ran, including that it reliably started every time, and also listed a problem it had with shifting.

    Yes, one kid asked me stupid questions that had answers listed right in the ad, but most callers were reasonable. I priced it to move and sold it in two days for $700 (this after calling a used car dealer who wouldn't even make me an offer). The car was over 10 years old and I only paid $13k when I bought it, so I was happy.

  45. Re:Wait by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

    I thought we weren't using FunnyJunk this week?

    Did the internet win? Can we go there now?

  46. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2

    well, maybe Craigslist is awesome where you live. But here in Los Angeles, and probably in most of the big cities, Craigslist sucks donkey dick due to spam and scammer posts.

    I'm looking at the Los Angeles apartment/housing section now, and it's about 70% spam, 15% scammer (con artist) and 15% legitimate posts.

    Now the sections that they require payment to post ads - such as jobs - are fine and spam free. But for much of CL, trying to find something is a royal pain in the ass. Makes you wonder why they don't require at least a small payment for posting an ad. That would end pretty much all spam instantaneously.

    Not only is the low barrier to entry for posting an ad (actually there is no barrier) causing a spam-fest, it also has a negative effect on legitimate posts. Since it costs nothing to post an ad, and you can post as many as you want for as long as you want, sellers develop a tendency to price their items ridiculously high in hopes of landing a sucker. The Motorcycle section for instance, is full of guys dreaming... seriously. And they post the same ads again and again (because their overpriced items don't sell).

    Example: back in late April, a guy advertised his 2007 VFR800 for $8500. I remember it well because that was one of the models I was searching for. The guy was dreaming, $8500 is well above Blue Book value and a realistic price would be $6500 for a *pristine* bike in excellent condition. Since nobody bought it, he would keep reposting the same ad again and again every few days. Once in a while he would lower the price a bit.

    The ad is still there, 2 months later. The price is now $7500. Nobody's bought it yet still.

    Back in the days of paid classified ads, this would never happen. Sellers would price their items realistically, since they paid money for the ad and wouldn't want to waste it on a very low percentage gamble.

    Another interesting bit is how spamming on CL has become a cottage industry. If you go to Freelancer.com or Elance.com (sites where you can hire programmers from India), you'll see many projects for Craigslist scrapers and auto-posters and so on.

    So yeah... CL isn't the wonderful unicorns and flower petals some people think it is. I wish it would die already and something similar (but more sensible) take its place.

  47. Re:Wait by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    If it had any trouble running, I would have thought to mention it in the ad - but it ran and shifted perfectly fine (I had just wanted a car that was under 180K miles before taking a 2000-mile road trip). Calling and asking, "Does it run okay?" is perfectly reasonable. But I am being honest-to-God-serious when I say that multiple people asked if it had a fucking engine.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  48. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a challenge, yes, but the world of business is no kindergarten where the world owes you success. So they need to find a way to convince people.

    Or they can do like so many other businesses that look for Easy Street do, lobby Congress to create regulation that benefits them.

  49. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    That's a challenge, yes, but the world of business is no kindergarten where the world owes you success. So they need to find a way to convince people.

    Great. I would like to convince people that CL is crap and actually harmful to the market and to users as compared to a service that wasn't so stupidly obstinate, so that a competitor has a chance to enter the market. I'm only one guy, but I could use a little help.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  50. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by mr.dreadful · · Score: 1

    Great, then CL is ready for disruption. I'm not saying that CL is awesome, I'm saying this is why you don't take your company public. You can do whatever you want. And if the CL audience is as sick of CL as you and others claim, then it's time for someone to start typing.

  51. Padmapper wouldn't be comprehensive by ffflala · · Score: 1

    I'm looking for a house in a specific neighbourhood and it's absolutely impossible to do via Craigslist directly!!! If Craig offered a map, I would at least understand why they might issue a C&D, but seriously...

    In the past year used CL to find a new apartment within a 1/2 square mile area of a specific neighborhood of a major metropolitan area.

    When apartment ads are filled out properly, there's a direct link to both a google map and a yahoo map for the specific ad. It's trivial to create your own customized neighborhood map using these links. Those that disregard the provided map links are usually agency redirect spam posts. HOWEVER, sometimes they're from people who just filled it out improperly, or not at all. Padmapper would miss these listings.

    I don't see how you can claim that padmapper saves you so much time: you need to review each link. It's not difficult to create your own custom map, and it's not particularly time consuming. You'd have to review the ads individually *anyway*, and it's a trivial matter to discard those outside of your area.

    I wasn't in a rush so I had weeks to search, but even spending perhaps 15 minutes a day browsing ads I was able to map several dozen apartments in and immediately around my desired area. My point is that finding the ads isn't the part of apartment hunting that consumes the most time: it's the follow up. Calling, viewing, visiting, etc. I suppose padmapper *might* have saved me an hour or two, but it also would have missed about a sizeable portion of the CL-listed apartments in my desired area.

  52. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by supermank17 · · Score: 1

    Eh, I don't really agree. For certain types of sites, having an existing community and userbase is a massive boost, and overcoming that is very difficult for a new player in the area. A new site could come along with all the features I could want in a listings-site, but I would probably still use Craigslist (despite all of the irritations it comes with) for selling something, because the larger user-base of Craigslist means I'm more likely to get the most money off my sale.

  53. Re:CraigsList is awesome, even if you don't get it by alexo · · Score: 1

    Try kijiji