South Pole Neutron Detectors Given New Role in Predicting Space Weather
sciencehabit writes "A team of researchers has found a way to forecast the intensity of solar storms by monitoring neutron sensors at the South Pole. The approach could help give advanced warning to astronauts and satellites, which would otherwise be irradiated and fried, respectively. Smaller versions of these sensors could one day be standard equipment on interplanetary spacecraft."
Neutrino detectors?
In other news, scientists have developed software which allows detection of incorrect spelling, which involves neither sattelites nor satellites.
UD Bartol Neutron Monitor program. http://neutronm.bartol.udel.edu/Welcome.html
Detects high energy neutrons produced by high-speed protons colliding with the Earth's upper atmosphere. TFA is that they have figured out the specific signal for high-energy solar flares.
(Last 30 days.)
Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
The approach could help give advanced warning to astronauts and sattelites, which would otherwise be irradiated and fried, respectively.
"Sattelites"? "Irradiated and fried, respectively" like meat? Respective of what?
[snip]
People get irradiated (ie cells affected by radiation)
Satellites get fried (ie circuts and/or other electronic components get shorted)
Both are common use terms (adjectives if you will) for the respective nouns that they are used to describe.
Respectively, in that sentence refers not to the sense of of the word which pertains to 'honor', but to the sense of the word that defines the order in which the given adjectives apply to the nouns. I.e. the term 'respectively' denotes that Irradiated refers to the Astronauts, whilst Fried refers to the Sattelites.
Your rant at the editor is as ridiculous as the content of your post...
After all, solar storms can knock the 'ell out of satellites.
Have gnu, will travel.
Great idea, because they've totally mastered predicting the weather here on earth...
Who would've thought Timothy has his fanboys? The fate of /. is more dire than I once thought...
One slashdot editor ought to be good enough for anyone!
Why is it hard to accurately detect high energy protons? They're charged; they must leave a huge wake of ionized particles behind them. Is it just that they are so energetic the detectors have to be huge? I'm sure the neutron detectors are actually detecting secondary (charged) particles from neutron interactions, meaning the polar detectors are "tertiary" (protons --> neutrons --> more charged particles).
fuck off, kdawson.