Slashdot Mirror


Defense Expert: Hire Hackers and Wage War

Phoghat writes "A top defense and cybersecurity expert says the U.S. should stop trying to take aim at expert hackers and start doing a better job of recruiting them. 'Let's just say that in some places you find guys with body piercings and nonregulation haircuts,' says U.S. Naval Postgraduate School professor John Arquilla . 'But most of these sorts of guys can't be vetted in the traditional way. We need a new institutional culture that allows us to reach out to them.'"

157 comments

  1. I got first post :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am guessing that culture doesn't want to be vetted, by any means, traditional or non-traditional.

  2. Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of these hackers inherently distrust the government, that's why they are hacking them. So what is the benefit in hiring them?

    1. Re:Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Principles can be overridden with money. Doesn't even need much. The benefit is that some of those hackers are very highly skilled, and they are used to not playing by the rules - which is good, because the enemies of the US won't be playing by the rules either.

      That's the idea, anyway. I think in practice any good hacker (As opposed to a conventionally, formally trained engineer) is going to be driven half-crazy by the highly conformist military culture, and those that can stick with it are going to need constant micromanaging to keep them on their assigned mission ('You want me to disassemble yet another possible Chinese worm? BORING!') rather than using the available resources to do what they think is best ('Ohh, I'll write a virus that installs HTTPSeverywhere and blocks RST packets! That'll totally screw with China's filtering!').

    2. Re:Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by axlr8or · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, principles can be overridden with ego. Real hackers are about the science. Hackers that are out to damaage things are about their egos. That's actually what mades hiring them fruitless. Once they get bored with the 'I work ops for the FBI' or whatever, they'll move on to, 'I'm a double agent' so and so forth etc...That's why instead of building things they find it much easier and gets them more attention to break things. No, they aren't good bets.

    3. Re:Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you going to get these people that don't play by the rules (which might be proved by multiple court visits) a high level security clearance to look at god knows what from any country? You'll need massive internal changes.

    4. Re:Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1

      That's the idea, anyway. I think in practice any good hacker (As opposed to a conventionally, formally trained engineer) is going to be driven half-crazy by the highly conformist military culture, and those that can stick with it are going to need constant micromanaging to keep them on their assigned mission ('You want me to disassemble yet another possible Chinese worm? BORING!') rather than using the available resources to do what they think is best ('Ohh, I'll write a virus that installs HTTPSeverywhere and blocks RST packets! That'll totally screw with China's filtering!').

      I know they, the military, didn't drive me crazy as I was already there! On the other hand, I do know I drove my command structures more than a little crazy; military behavior was the only down item on my evaluations which were characterized with 4.0's (2.0 in Military Behavior). What I did have was very, very high-level protection. That was the result of turning an (potentially multi-million dollar) IT disaster-in-the-making into a success. After that, if you needed weird, well for the time, from the systems and networks, or pretty much anything else analyst/engineering-related, I was your guy in the Pacific Fleet region. [I'm pretty sure the person they had in Atlantic Fleet was of the same stuff, although we never met.]

      The eventual result was to place me outside the conventional chain-of-command in a branch reporting directly to command, and attach people now and again, under Special Projects [me , I kid you not]. I know they got a hell of a lot more than what they paid for, even discounting a million or so in training costs, and it was one of those jobs where I would have done it for free. Still, the Navy is very tradition-bound and, yet, does have the ability to recognize talent.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    5. Re:Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Principles can be overridden with money. Doesn't even need much.

      Hmmm... are you thinking about US hiring Russian hackers?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by AssholeMcGee+ · · Score: 1

      This article is really bad.. The gov is not going to just come out and ask to begin with, and it is a known fact they quietly have hackers working for them, or they set something up intentionally to get hacked, of course it is a test to see how it was hacked, and what they could do going forward. Not something they do all the time, but it is done..

    7. Re:Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You offer them protection. Recruit the hackers who are hacking the 'enemy' Governments and move them some place that the Governments they are hacking can't touch them. Give them a good wage/lifestyle and keep them safely out of the hands of the other Governments. I'm sure you could hire a number of refugee who have fled other countries who are IT saavy enough and has a hatred of the regime they fled to want to hack their [the regimes] Government computers.

    8. Re:Distrust and lie paved way to these hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most crackers inherently distrust the government, but most hackers may not.

      OK

  3. If this is about cyberwar, by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    I say it's awfully childish. Do we really want the Internet to be an unstable place? Because it's going to be so easy for others to retaliate, and the losers will be those who lose their rights.

    1. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by jimmydevice · · Score: 2

      Isn't that what the man wants?

    2. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I say it's awfully childish. Do we really want the Internet to be an unstable place?

      It is far more childish to think that if we just play nice, everyone else will follow suit. The Internet will not be made secure by covering our eyes, crossing our fingers, and praying. It will only be more secure by making sure that those interested in its security have bigger "guns" than those interested in its instability.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or by actually investing in secure technologies and practices. In real life, it's better to make sure those interested in security are well-armed because there's not much that can withstand a bazooka, but, online, it's very difficult to compromise communications encrypted with 4096-bt RSA.

      tl;dr offense is easier in the real world than it is online.

    4. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Internet Security is a fantasy. Allowing anyone and everyone access to the network makes it almost impossible. I can't believe that servers with secure information would ever, under any circumstances be connected to something so untamed. For starters all my secure computers would never run a disk based operating system. The entire OS would reside in ROM and when it was time for an upgrade I'd burn a new chip. Expensive? Not as expensive as having 1.5 billion dollars worth of research hacked. I don't think network security is nearly paranoid enough.

    5. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

      An organic system is inherently unstable - this is why the global network is so resilient against targetted attacks (such as wide-scale DNS poisoning, root name server outage...). The system will route around the dark spot. Whether or not it's "what the man wants" is irrelevant. If "The Man" wants the Internet to go dark permanently, all "The Man" has to do is cause a global, total and simultaneous blackout of every node, domain and name server, webserver - anything with a CPU and internet connection.

      No biggy.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    6. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by tenco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you hand out bigger "guns" and the internet becomes a warzone, everyone loses. The only way to keep it civilized is by handing out better "armor", making "guns" as ineffectual as possible. Since the military isn't interested in armor only and i don't trust them to use "guns" in a reasonable way (if there actually is one) i don't know why i should put me under their command.

    7. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do we really want the Internet to be an unstable place?

      What makes you think it's stable now? Although I think "Cyberwarfare" is more media drama than actual warfare, networks could be doing a lot more to make them more secure. We don't becuase, users. Users don't want inconvenience. Users don't want two passwords (one email, one login). Users want their desktop on their mobile device. Users want access to confidential data on the same PC their kids play on. Don't get me wrong, without users there's no need for a network but things have gotten way out of hand with security.

      I think it's a good sign that some places in the tech industry are starting to realize they could be doing better. Maybe they will finally get around to listening to real experts instead of paid-for marketing shills.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    8. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I doubt that the USA are the ones interested in the Internet's security.

    9. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      What do you mean "We", white man?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    10. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      The entire OS would reside in ROM and when it was time for an upgrade I'd burn a new chip. Expensive? Not as expensive as having 1.5 billion dollars worth of research hacked. I don't think network security is nearly paranoid enough.

      What makes you think you're going to write an OS without a single security flaw that could be exploited?
      Burning it to ROM is just ensuring the exploit lingers in the wild longer than it should.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    11. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      I can see it now, the war finally winde up in the basement of a 'nuked' building and two groupls of stinky dirty people wark away frantically trying to hack the opponents computer connected by a single ethernet cable. They hurl insults at one another and chide and talk sepremecy of morals and ethics until all the sudden one of them trips on the cable and pulls it from the jack on the back of the computer. It's there they all freeze. Completely confused and not knowing what to do. And they stay there inanimate soiling themselves and pissing down their legs until they starve to death. Long story short? It's funny how addicted people have come to abstraction when it's so easy to wield a pair of wirecutters.

    12. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It makes it impossible to rewrite the software. No worries that your files are infected. Flawed software can be rewritten and another ROM burned. But at least you know that any malware on the chip is your own.

    13. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      I don't think writing an OS to rom has a good cost/benefit ratio when it comes to computer security, not anymore anyhow. There are 100 other things that you could be doing first that are going to go further giving you bang for your security buck. Also I want you to consider the logistics of replacing all these chips, having a tech walk around and upgrade these machines is going to expensive and time consuming. Also you're going to have to account for human error in this process unless you have each one of these machines advertising it's rom version to some central location some machines are inevitably going to get missed.

      Security works by identifying assets and risks and then building rings of security measures around each of those assets in order to mitigate that risk up until you've brought the risk down to an acceptable level given the cost and hassle of your measures. Always ask yourself ok so assuming X is hacked what's going to happen next to minimize the risk? I like to imagine that all my systems are old and buggy with well known remote exploits already and I have to try and make them secure without software updates.

    14. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      This is why we have file permissions, read/append/no-exec only filesystems, and file integrity checking. If there is a 0day vulnerability it's as though your systems are already compromised. Also where are users going to store their documents, emails, databases? What about software that makes changes? Do you really want to rewrite a rom for each system in your enterprise and have some dude walking around swapping it out?

    15. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      This is a system for extreme security. For average stuff I'd say no. If I have a billion dollars in research on file I can't think of any reason not to spend huge amounts of money to keep it safe. Think about it, for 100 grand the local bank is sufficient, how about 1 billion dollars? You want it there or somewhere with loads of guards and high fences.

    16. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      Granted.. once the stakes get high enough it is probably worthwhile.

    17. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by lightknight · · Score: 1

      To have the Defense industry bankroll a witch-hunt to find these individuals, so they can be forced to sign up for a cyber-tour of duty and bureaucratic nonsense which burns their skins, so various corporations / interested parties can hire them away with better offers to engage in industrial espionage? In the name of patriotism and the American way, I'm sure GM / GE is willing to crack into foreign firms and lift their intellectual property.

      The bigger problem here, of course, is that these people are not going to be paid well at all, and the people who want to hire them are exactly the opposite whom they'd work for. Hence the "at gun point" conscription that is likely to occur.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    18. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROM is cheap, you just burn the OS to a DVD and there you go. There's no reason why it needs to be on a chip. And really, the chips themselves should require a jumper on the rare occasion where you need to update them anyways.

    19. Re:If this is about cyberwar, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could make it secure instead of attacking everything you stupid american.

  4. I've heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..finding what they care about and holding it ransom works well. Also I've heard that some nations don't consider waterboarding to be torture so that might be a further way to reachout. Or is 'reachout' not in the same classification as 'collateral damage' and 'illegal combatant'.

    1. Re:I've heard... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out.

  5. That's how they killed it. by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Government sanctioned hacking will lead to enemy government retaliation, and then they'll take the internet as we know it to save us from those damn terrorists.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:That's how they killed it. by jafiwam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's sorta funny to read this type of bleating in a Slashdot article that appears on the same day as one that says the Chinese government has backdoors in 80% of Telecoms to sniff information.

      Look, ya dumb sheep.

      They are already waging war against us, enemy and "friendly" states already use their government resources to steal intellectual property and wage industrial espionage against the United States. You obviously don't actually run any internet-facing services or you would see this shit in your logs.

      The fact that our government doesn't do it aggressively too is the odd part. It's time to man up and fight back or your children (assuming you manage to breed) will be speaking Chinese and working for Russian mobsters for a daily loaf of bread.

    2. Re:That's how they killed it. by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      Better dead than Red.

    3. Re:That's how they killed it. by BurstElement · · Score: 2

      Haha... you really need to take a good look and consider who are the sheep and who is the shepherd!
      Do you honestly believe that the US Govt. doesn't have backdoors / access to backdoors in 99% of US telecoms tech?

    4. Re:That's how they killed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the comments on that article about the Chinese backdoors saying that this claim is bullshit and and a complete extrapolation. Many people commented that the guy making that claim was just playing on our fears to get money for his company.

      Maybe you should start questioning what you hear and stop believing everything you're told.

    5. Re:That's how they killed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the same logic that Climate Change deniers use? Wouldn't it be more prudent to assume the worst case scenario and act upon it, since that worst case scenario has dire consequences?

    6. Re:That's how they killed it. by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Informative

      > The fact that our government doesn't do it aggressively too is the odd part

      How do you know our government isn't already doing the same?
      Look at Stuxnet... we have the capability.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:That's how they killed it. by aekafan · · Score: 0

      I can't figure out whether commenters like this are just dumb or funny. I would guess that it's both. How about I let you pay for your governments perpetual wars? I want no part of them, You can keep your government, too, while you are at it

    8. Re:That's how they killed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The fact that our government doesn't do it aggressively too is the odd part

      How do you know our government isn't already doing the same?
      Look at Stuxnet... we have the capability.

      Given the US government's recent penchant to crow about their cyber espionage efforts, if there were more than Stuxnet and Flame(r), I suspect the world would know of them.

    9. Re:That's how they killed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you promoted an article about a man making a *claim*, to an article stating a fact about China having backdoors.

      I am starting to wonder about the interests behind the constant claims that China (and Russia!) are enemies of the US, while ignoring the massive scale of Israeli espionage against the US.

    10. Re:That's how they killed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese government has backdoors in 80% of Telecoms to sniff information.

      Yes, and we must close that bomber gap. I mean, we must close that ICBM gap before it is too late!! Oh wait, now it is the internet backdoor gap!

      Maybe if someone doesn't want any Chinese backdoors, maybe, just maybe, they may want to limit sourcing of their chips to companies of allied nations, or perhaps, *gasp* US companies that have fabs in the US

      China is building their own CPU instead of whining about foreign-only CPUs "with backdoors".

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loongson

      China uses Linux with its Loongson processor family to achieve technology independence.

      And US? Bitching and fearmongering that China is building stuff and they are not. Require all gov't contracts to be sourced from friendly nations and then you don't have to scaremonger about backdoors.

    11. Re:That's how they killed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking Chinese and working for Russian mobsters..

      Problem?

    12. Re:That's how they killed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might be speaking Chinese anyways due to China owning most of the United States debt.. in essence by owning the debt they own the country.

  6. Easy by santax · · Score: 4, Funny

    Buy Blizzard. Threaten to close WoW account of said hacker. Et voila, you've got yourself a hacker that you can count upon! (Give them a free flying mount once in a while and you keep them happy too!)

  7. This is nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of the most talented technical people I know are also the most clean-cut and athletic. Some of the worst, show-offs who know the talk but little else, fall into your usual hacker stereotype with their appearance. I think the former is more realistic, and the latter is more romantic fantasy— brought on by people who idealize Gibson. In other words, why bother? The first group is more likely to give you a well-rounded individual who actually knows her material. The second group is a total crapshoot.

    1. Re:This is nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know a few nerds who are also fitness geeks but you're highly delusional if you think that most hackers fall into that category. Most of us are not fit, unhealthy, and are weird looking.

    2. Re:This is nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed my point.

    3. Re:This is nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The clean cut guy is clearly more of a conformist, likely less hostile towards authority, and because of that potentially less likely to be a whistleblower.

    4. Re:This is nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us are not fit, unhealthy, and are weird looking.

      Most of the ones YOU know about. And that is because the government has been paying the fit, healthy, stable ones to stay out of the spotlight and work on classified projects.

      There is a huge misconception that the majority of "hackers" are anti-authority social deviants. There are a vast amount of highly educated, professional, stable people who can do everything the deviants do and at the same time remain out of public scrutiny.

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but you are not special. For every underground hacker, there *is* a more stable, healthy, better paid, and equally talented version already working for the government.

    5. Re:This is nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What retarded shit-eating fuck modded this insightful?

    6. Re:This is nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hackers (not some web developer) have a problem with authority that's why they hack. one little background check on these guys will pull up many crimes and unwanted qualities. For example maybe one liked pot when he was younger, maybe one got caught driving without a licence, maybe he is a wiki leaks supporter, maybe his ip and handle are connected with some anonymous deal, ect ect, all of these things will easily keep him out of a high level security clearance, no matter how clean cut he looks now. they want people that break the law so they will do it to other countries law, problem is they aren't allowed to hire those kinds of people due to national security.

    7. Re:This is nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and much less likely to be an actual hacker and probably some it tech or web developer rather than the kid that's been doing since he was 12 and already found a back door into whatever on his own.

  8. No trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have worked with some of these types. They for sure do not trust the government and the government could not and should not ever trust them.

    1. Re:No trust by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Use them at arms length.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  9. hackers by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most of those guys are clueless about the outside world so they may be hard to motivate. Maybe sex will work. Hire some hookers.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    1. Re:hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am only interested in the "interview" involve in cracking an encryption while getting a blow job at the same time.

    2. Re:hackers by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Offer them free Mountain Dew and Skittles.

    3. Re:hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skittles? Are they black? Should we shoot them?

      No.... not skittles... cheetos or doritos would be much more suitable for hackers.

    4. Re:hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hash

    5. Re:hackers by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      too salty, need sweet and tangy.

    6. Re:hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of those guys are clueless about the outside world so they may be hard to motivate. Maybe sex will work. Hire some hookers.

      I can see it now - a new marketing campaign from the US Government ...

      Hookers for the Hackers

  10. It takes one to know one by cheros · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that vetting the ethics of a hacker needs someone who has insight in the cultural framework as much as the technical capabilities of the person under review, and that is MILES beyond your average HR setup.

    I know from my own experience that the best reviewer for tech is someone who is either a former hacker him/herself, or has a personality that borders on Aspergers. You cannot understand technical people if you do not have the required mental tools, and especially the brighter hackers do not exactly conform to the standard employee model.

    So, use one to know one, and forget about your average corporate HR droid doing anywhere near a sensible assessment. Oh, and forget about standard management techniques either - not only does it take one to know one, it certainly takes one to manage them.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:It takes one to know one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Solution: Use the usual HR droids that tech companies use, but go through the discard pile of applicants instead.

    2. Re:It takes one to know one by hoggoth · · Score: 2

      > forget about your average corporate HR droid
      So what you are saying is these aren't the droids we're looking for?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:It takes one to know one by cheros · · Score: 2

      Actually, that's how I got hold of the first security admin for a company I had just helped setting up. After an internal move (prior to official launch) I inherited a desk that was obviously HR. It had a stack of CVs in, all with "no" across the top. 4 CVs in I see the perfect candidate, so I got him in. He stayed there for 3 years or so..

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  11. stereotypes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While we're at it, could we please also *not* assume that l33t hackers come only in one visual package (piercings, ink, etc.)?

    1. Re:stereotypes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could we please also *not* assume that l33t hackers come only in one visual package

      Or that they're more competent than security professionals. Yea, there are a few who know what they're doing, but most are just copycat/script kiddies. Whoever wrote Stuxnet and Flame was way beyond the level of a l33t hacker, so I'm guessing at least one government already employs some very capable people.

    2. Re:stereotypes by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      I know that the vast majority of "hackers" are script kiddies.. but to say they're less skilled than our offering of security professionals is not true. Talk to your average CISSP you'll see that the skill distribution on the other side of the fence is equally matched. It's funny because most CISSP study material provides these frauds their excuse for lacking technical knowledge by chapter one.
      Golden nuggets like:
      "I don't need to know the details because I'm a manager"
      AND
      "Saying hackers are going to provide the best advice for stopping attacks is like asking a drunk driver how to keep the roads safe" (Implying that a guy who draws diagrams on a whiteboard but can't configure the network settings on a windows box is a better choice)

      Sadly 20% of test takers fail their test the first time they take it and the MAJORITY have demonstrated 5 years of infosec experience prior to taking it.

  12. Alternative by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    Or, instead of spending all that money on institutional reach out plans, why not kidnap their wife/son/grandma to entice them to work for you? You can lock them overnight in a room with no contact to the outside except for a 1994 style beeper and a blunt swiss pocket knife. Oh, and some chewing gum, an out of work WWE wrestler guarding the door, and a red Ferrari parked in the back parking lot. Trust me, details matter.

  13. from hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    FUCK YOU

  14. Lets See... by Phrogman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Take highly competent tech people who are generally speaking somewhat anti-authoritarian, give them the tools to do nasty things to the nations enemies via hacking, malware programming etc, and expect them to keep their mouths shut about it.
    A lot of people don't trust the government - and often with very good reason - why would they want to hack for it?
    How long until the complete log files of everything they and everyone they associate with are sent to Wikileaks?
    Find technical people who are not anti-authoritarian and get them to do your hacking - just hire them for ability and knowledge rather than the traditional military virtues that most military organizations look for. In fact, hire them as civilian contractors and then keep them away from the rest of the military :P

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    1. Re:Lets See... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people he is talking about hiring already have the tools. The trouble is they only want to hire the ones who haven't been using them illegally, and if they are good enough to be valuable it is hard to know if they have been breaking the law.

      I suspect hacking took off among anti-authoritarians partially because it was a tool of asymmetrical warfare that could be wielded against governments. Now the government wants in on the action, China-style, except they've been systematically alienating the audience they hope to woo for the past 30-10,000 years. I've been shocked over the past 4-8 years to see how drastically the industry and government attitude on computer security have shifted. That said, despite the sudden increase in cognitive-dissonance-inducing cheese, the culture itself is still pretty much defined as a counter-culture.

      The government has a hard sell asking the very minority they were racially cleansing less than a decade ago to help them fight a war. A new sucker is born every minute and if people don't have short enough memories to forgive the past, I guess they can always wait for a new generation to crawl out of their diapers in to Uncle Sam's arms.

    2. Re:Lets See... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you say, hacking started mostly among anti-authoritarians and borderline anarchists. People who were quite opposed to the government and the authorities.

      These people will never work for the government. If the government ever manages to hire hackers with their skills, those government hackers won't be the anti-authoritarians - they'll be different people, who just happen to have the same hacking skills.

      It also doesn't matter which generation the government recruits from. Every generation's anti-authoritarians will just try to stick it to The Man, although they will adapt. Today it's hacking, tomorrow it might something else (maybe vandalism - it's hard for the government to spy on people when every public security camera has been spray-painted or smashed). And the government will just be behind again and forced to adapt. And that's the beauty of it - the government is always going to piss off a group of people who have the right skills to fight back. This ensures that no government ever gets too powerful.

    3. Re:Lets See... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      How do these principles differ from the art of recruiting old-fashioned, y'know, spies?

    4. Re:Lets See... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      secret organisations have a similar problem the best candidates are all criminals that have evaded authorities for years in there own or other countries but HR will only let the goodie two shoes in.

    5. Re:Lets See... by Inda · · Score: 1

      I could be convinced to keep my mouth shut for large sums of cash. For an even larger amount, I'd wear pom-poms and chant the company mantra

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  15. Really really old idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in Summercon, Atlanta (1995). Chatted with many of the great hackers of the time, as well as many awesome specialists, legendary people truly. And it was already a consensus at the time. Internet, still in its infancy, wasn't understood properly by gov't forces, and they were ill-prepared, for their true assets, the hackers, weren't being used _with_ them, but instead were in a war _against_ them. That's not something you can learn at school, with the exception of some awesome teachers who are doing a great grunt work of really teaching hacking, even then, I heard of more of these teachers having to fight school administrations to keep their courses.

    The idea seems to start to rub in, but it's 20 years late :) . I'm happy the article pushes the idea to the mainstream, though.

  16. Re:I got first post :P by oztiks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Want to reach the hacking culture? It's like hiring tribes people to help log the Amazon rainforest. Corporations should learn from the mistakes made in those senarios before even thinking of strategies such as this.

    The irony here is although the Govt started the Internet as an official project, it has always rested on the shoulders of academics and the talent of the hacking community, corporations come further down the list.

  17. Same problem for both groups. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    The problem with the Government hiring those "shady" hacker types is they have a hard time trusting them.

    Ironically enough, hackers seem to have that exact same problem with "shady" Government types too.

    No surprise a story like this comes out this close to Black Hat/DEFCON...again, it's not a matter of finding hackers...

  18. And we'll wage a "kick ass" cyberwar.... lulz by devforhire · · Score: 1

    So they want to hire the people that are currently at war with them. A good idea, but not very realistic.

    Maybe they could try and pass some more laws like SOPA or dodge the democratic process with ACTA-like treaties and see if that drums up more recruits.

    The people they will get will be the "retired," mediocre to average hackers who are now married and have too much too lose and can be bought with cool toys.

  19. never going to work, ridiculous principle. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you have to realize that many of the "cyber hackers" the government is eyeballing are the very same people that love nothing more than to leak classified data and hack into defense secrets solely because they view your establishent as the problem.

    speaking as one of the the aformentioned non-regulation pierced guy, i can say that each time i hear a blowhard suit at the anything-department wax prophetic upon anything prefixed with "cyber," i roll my eyes, turn up the hardcore techno, and go back to writing that python interface for the communications receiver I bought on craigslist a few months back.

    no one cares about the next war you're trying to sell america except the mouthbreathing walmartians in the sticks. the people youre trying to "reach out to" explicitly do not respond because they arent stupid enough to nod when told "be all you can be." as knowledge is power they understand enough about your institution to avoid it at all costs. all its done in the past 40 years is act as an engine of misery, destruction and sorrow across the globe.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by roman_mir · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "be all you can be" is not just a powerful message, it is a threat. Realise that what government is really saying there is that all you can really be is only achievable at this point if you are part of that government institution, and people that this message is aimed at cannot get government jobs as press secretaries, congressional staff or even regulators in an executive office. This is a threat and the reason government can issue it is because it is the very institution that creates the conditions, under which this threat is very much a reality.

    2. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      "be all you can be."

      knowing is half the battle

      FTFY

      What I just heard you say is that they need to stop putting out commercials and need to start producing more military-themeed cartoons with public service announcements embedded in them, that way they can brainwash the next generation of kids to become adults who support the military.

    3. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by axlr8or · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute. If your female, EMAIL ME PLEEEAAAZZEEE!!!! Hahahaha

    4. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, everyone, it's roman_mir with yet another instalment in his series, "The Gubmint Is Evil And Everything Would Be Just Peachy If We Got Rid Of The Evil Gubmint". Hooray!

    5. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Which is why they are fighting them instead of recruiting. After they get a hacker, they give him a choice between an unrealistically long prison service and a slap on the wrist provided they join them. Most hackers have chosen the latter.

    6. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      Be all you can be - kill some people.

      That is the message. If that's not 'evil', then what is?

    7. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe that's were all your leaks are coming from disgruntled hackers/employees.

    8. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 0

      Lol, do you dance around the computer while you "hack" with your cool "python" ala Swordfish?

      PS the 'lol' above should be construed as a derisive lol and not a "we're chumming about" lol.

    9. Re:never going to work, ridiculous principle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's not 'evil', then what is?

      Nothing and everything.

      Nothing is "evil", because "evil" only exists in your mind.

      Everything is "evil", because somebody somewhere in their mind thinks it is.

      Believing in some absolute, non-relative form of good and evil would just lead to socialism. It leads to people thinking: why, if it's a universal good/evil, why not have the collective do something about it?

  20. This is why you will never be able to recruit them by DerUberTroll · · Score: 1

    Because they fight against everything the government stands for = Oppression.

  21. No age rules, no boot camp, no medical disqualifie by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    No age rules, no boot camp, no / limited medical disqualifies.

    Why should some who say may be in a wheelchair not be able to do work like just because of having to go to boot camp or the same thing about age rules so you have long time pros come in that may be to old to pass boot camp.

    Also there are smart IT people who don't have the mental mindset to handle a boot camp as well.

  22. Do they want older hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm serious, because to-date I haven't seen much recruitment effort of 'seniors', you know, like, 40+ types. But I do see a lot, and I mean a lot of things to disqualify anyone that might apply, (for all the G-Jobs I see), even though folks might apply for all the right reasons. Even people older than 40, perhaps because of their inherit threat, but what do I know? They might even be so old as to be on medical marajuana in another state, and fear drug tests and a permanent stain on their future I.T./data center emplyoment record; and asking themselves, 'is it worth the effort to apply?'

    And in case anyone is wondering, I'm willing to compete for my job dammit. Seriously.

    Posted anon, but thank goodness after much time & effort learning new and up-to-date linux/web stuff, the job outlook in my I.T. sector is ultra-rosey. But I am serious, do they want older hackers and what will they do to get the best for the jobs being offered? Disqualifying a huge lot of experience doesn't seem wise or just; while I think loyalty can be relatively expected in return for the trust and relative security being offered. Especially when it comes to TCP/IP network security experience.

    Since I am already posting anon on /., does it help I don't have a spousal unit to tie me down, and is anyone here even surprised by that? Honestly, how are people like me being actively recruited and allowed to qualify, and for what exactly?

    Oh yeah, I am old at 50 already, with a longer background to check then most people perhaps, but I know where I.T. is going dammit and can seriously compete because I've been on-track for awhile. Can I be recruited for such a g-job?

    1. Re:Do they want older hackers? by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you understand what makes hackers, hackers... Then the threat of 'senior' staff is as follows. Most hackers, narcissist or not, put all of their effort in to one facet. They may be at the top for a few years but as soon as technology moves on so does their interest. They are stuck in the field they started in. It's that kind of commitment that drives a hacker in the first place, it's the same commitment that keeps them from moving to different fields.

  23. Wait by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need a new institutional culture that allows us to reach out to them.'

    Cue MONTAGE featuring Cameron Diaz as cute "brutal" platoon sargeant yelling orders at misfis!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:Wait by ozonearchitect · · Score: 1

      LOL!!! Perfect :)

  24. Again with the military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Americans realize that in most of the world, there aren't people constantly trying to find a new military technology or advantage, and the press doesn't talk about these things every day.

    1. Re:Again with the military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America outspend the rest of the world on what it still calls "defense". It's aggressive Imperial overstretch typical for the end of an era. That rest of the world will not finance this spending spree indefinitely. However still dangerous and out of control while lasts. By the way wasn't it America objecting to "state sponsored terrorism"? Only ideological "American Exceptionalism" will argue that this is different. But those are the Neocons who are still maintaining that the US went to Iraq to create an strong democracy. Guess that Cheney's heart gave out when he heard that.

    2. Re:Again with the military by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Most of the world isn't English speaking, so what do you know about it? Just because you are European or some other nationality (economics considers EU a nation) doesn't really give you the right to speak for the world. Some of which (looking at you, China) are heavily invested in stealing corporate and gov't technology.

      Defense contractors and military sources get pounded with millions of probes from other states each month. And employees are regularly spied on. A couple years ago a company had a bunch of classified information stolen by China from a backdoor passed in by a USB drive, given to them by a vendor at a conference.

      You probably don't hear about these things if you don't work in the industry or if you aren't valued as a target, bu. This is the stuff we deal with on the day-to-day.

      Source: I've work in cybersecurity.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    3. Re:Again with the military by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      America outspend the rest of the world on what it still calls "defense".

      I wonder why. Could it be for the same reason that a jewelry store outspends a hot dog stand on defense?

    4. Re:Again with the military by Johann+Lau · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More like thugs with piles of corpses of corpses in their basement, that are overshadowed only by their needy desire for approval and respect, gang up on anybody looking at them the wrong way, while robbing those they claim to protect blind. Which is exactly the opposite of what you claim it is, defending something of value. It's destroying value, and for pitiful reasons.

      Bill Hicks said it best, why even bother typing when I could quote that:

      The world is like a ride in an amusement park, and when you choose to go on it you think it's real, 'cause that's how powerful our minds are. The ride goes up and down, and round and round. It has thrills and chills, and it's very brightly coloured, and it's very loud. And it's fun, for a while.

      Some people have been on the ride for a long time, and they begin to question: "Is this real, or is this just a ride?". Other people have remembered, and they come back to us, and they say: "Hey, don't worry, don't be afraid, ever, because: This is just a ride". And we kill those people.

      "Shut him up! We have a lot invested in this ride. Shut him up! Look at my furrows of worry; Look at my bank account; and my family. This just has to be real."

      It's just a ride. But we always kill those good people who try to tells us that - you ever noticed that? - and let the demons run amok. But it doesn't matter, because... it's just a ride, and we can change it any time we want.

      It's only a choice, no effort, no work, no job, no savings of money; a choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourself off. The eyes of love, instead, see all of us as one.

      Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, to a better ride. Take all that money we spend on weapons and defence each year and instead spend it feeding, clothing and educating the poor of the world - which it would many times over, not one human being excluded - and we can explore space together, both inner and outer, forever, and in peace.

      Bill Fucking Hicks.

      And if you think a comedian doesn't count, try just about any great mind... they more or less all agree. They either didn't write about it, or they said something to the effect of the above. Anything lower than that is just mediocre BS. People lie to themselves, so they lie to you ("you" as in "the people"), and you drag that cart all the way up the hill... in it? Banal bullshit. Trinkets and lies. Coffins are being flushed down the toilet, while show tunes play.

      War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent.

      George Orwell.

      Could it be for the same reason that a jewelry store outspends a hot dog stand on defense?

      Deadstick.

    5. Re:Again with the military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod the man up.

    6. Re:Again with the military by c0lo · · Score: 1

      America outspend the rest of the world on what it still calls "defense".

      I wonder why. Could it be for the same reason that a jewelry store outspends a hot dog stand on defense?

      A perfect example of "American Exceptionalism". Wake up, buddy, you ARE a hot-dog joint... maybe bigger than a stand, but still a fast-food establishment. You only need to look for what US tries so hard to sell nowadays... crappy Hollywood movies/music.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    7. Re:Again with the military by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      I love when people anthropomorphize reality. Well, or think there's some evil cabal of "fat cats" forcnig the world into misery and war for profiteering purposes. I'd say both are equally idiotic.

      What Hicks says appeals to a certain sort of person who likes to see themselves as "above it all". All of us "squares", why we're just "Wage slaves" (I _know_ you're a user of that ridiculous phrase) while you've totally seen through it.

      So by all means, sell your computer. Sell your TV. Sell everything but enough to survive on and give it all to the hungry. Don't lock your doors, get rid of all your (lol) trinkets. Totally, like, tune out you deep fucking thinker.

      I'll be sure to feel very banal and ashamed as I work hard to provide myself and my family a comfortable life. Why, I'll really look chagrined when some fucking nimrod comes and espouses his ironically self unaware philosophy of "it's all just a ride, maaaan!".

    8. Re:Again with the military by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      why we're just "Wage slaves" (I _know_ you're a user of that ridiculous phrase) while you've totally seen through it.

      I can't remember using that word ever actually, unless quoting someone. I usually just say "slaves".

      espouses his ironically self unaware philosophy

      Oh, so that's why you parade strawmen, and as your killer argument "you think you're better than others, wahh wahh". Because you totally could debate it, but you just don't wanna. Suuuure.

      This isn't even philosophy, it's more physics and history than anything esoteric, you know? It's just plain fucking observation, and you're just wasting your time by moaning instead of arguing.

      Who the fuck are you, anyway? The "you're not allowed to understand more than I do" police? What kind of shit comfort is this you're bragging about, sir? All you money can't buy you not being a moron, so what is that all about?

    9. Re:Again with the military by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck are you, anyway? The "you're not allowed to understand more than I do" police? What kind of shit comfort is this you're bragging about, sir? All you money can't buy you not being a moron, so what is that all about?

      Aww, that's what's so cute about you! You think you've cracked the case! You're like the Murder She Wrote of life's mysteries!

      As for being a moron - nobody's keeping track so I don't care if I'm a moron, only about quality of life.

  25. Re:No age rules, no boot camp, no medical disquali by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    You expect inclusiveness from the US military? Up until quite recently, their policy was to kick out anyone they determined to be gay. Their policy on women is still to confine them to desk jobs, far away from combat. Perhaps it would be better to strip the DoD from all responsibility for internet security and assign such tasks exclusively to a new agency, answerable directly to congress. They'd work with the military and intelligence services, but not be part of them. No boot camp, no ranks, and a staff of tech-experts and intelligence experts rather than generals who got up the ranks by being good at killing stuff.

  26. Re:I got first post :P by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Want to reach the hacking culture? It's like hiring tribes people to help log the Amazon rainforest. Corporations should learn from the mistakes made in those senarios before even thinking of strategies such as this.

    What the corporate MBAs would immediately deduce is that the tribespeople had been improperly incentivized, and should have been offered different shiny stuff. Numerous case studies would then be performed to find the optimum lowest-cost shiny stuff to offer to induce tribespeople to wreck their environment. Devastation of the rainforest would not be abated, while corporate profits and MBA bonuses would increase grotesquely for a few quarters.

    Similar dysfunctional thinking would be applied to recruiting hackers.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  27. I will take "cyberwar" seriously ... by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    ... when they recommend the US government move desktops off Windows.

    Until they do that, they're not taking it seriously either. It's just a boondoggle to transfer money from the taxpayer to the military-industrial complex.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:I will take "cyberwar" seriously ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you want them to use Linux because it was magically written to be impervious to attack. A dollar say s I can crack your Linux box faster than you can crack win95, assuming you even have the skills to do that? Get past your bias.

    2. Re:I will take "cyberwar" seriously ... by i286NiNJA · · Score: 0

      Can I get a -1 troll?
      Unless you're sitting on some 0-day in the TCP/IP stack, iptables, openssh, or apache I think you're pretty much talking out of your ass because that's all that needs to be exposed on most installs. Microsoft EOL'd win95 and dropped all support for it a long time ago since that time I'm sure new remote vulnerabilities have been found that affect it. There is no way you can be serious.

  28. Time to stop the backdoor culture by hlavac · · Score: 1

    Problem with backdoors is, the insecurity points both ways - you can't have it secure just for you and insecure for others. Once you put the backdoors into everything, they are there, ready to be misused against everyone, including you, whatever noble puropse you thought they were to initially serve. Thinking nobody will find out is delusional. This will not end well :(

    1. Re:Time to stop the backdoor culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Let's get rid of the back doors. Like the 1994 Communications Assistance To Law Enforcement Act. No wonder the hackers don't trust the government. As we try to make systems secure, they demand we make things secure except from them.

  29. Re:This is why you will never be able to recruit t by Skapare · · Score: 1

    They seem to be having success in China, North Korea, and Russia.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  30. Re:No age rules, no boot camp, no medical disquali by Skapare · · Score: 2

    Just don't hire them as members of the military in the usual sense.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  31. He's got the culture clash wrong by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    This presupposes that the cultural clash between the military and the hackers is about their fashion choices instead of being about devoting your life to the more efficient killing of other people in the pursuit of enriching the already rich and powerful.

    He might want to think beyond allowing non-regulation haircuts and piercings.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:He's got the culture clash wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you even knew a service member you would understand just how ignorant you are of our culture.

    2. Re:He's got the culture clash wrong by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Quiet right you can vet hackers the same way you do any one else - OK not all would be cool with the job and what is involved in being vetted for DV / TS. But any one who works in high end tech jobs is probably going to face the decision do I work on defense work. But this guy seems to have zero idea, Gary McKinnon FFS he was caught hacking into NASA looking for info on UFOs - this is a short step from the sort of people who post on Usenet claiming that the BBC is sending them secret messages via the medium of the TV news.

  32. There's NO opportunity by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    Like the opportunity to destroy AmeriCIA from within!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:There's NO opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like the opportunity to get hung out to dry when somebody gets caught. You won't 'retire' from this job.

  33. Off-topic, I know... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    But climate is now demonstrated by data to have been HOTTER in Roman and Medieval times, than now.

    This is in the journal, Nature. If you pardon the pun, this isn't a hotbed of "deniers".

    http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1589.html

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Off-topic, I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point being? The problem isn't that climate's changing, it's that it's doing so at an unprecedented rate and because of humans. The climate is always changing, but it's largely unprecedented for it to happen over such a short period of time and for it to likely be a long term change.

    2. Re:Off-topic, I know... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      It was hotter before - at least twice - and the Anthro-Co2 hypothesis does not accommodate the findings.

      The claims about rate are unsupported by any observed evidence. Only by extrapolative models, with assumptions that are unproven and being challenged by actual observation data.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  34. older pros are needed as just haveing JR's by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    older pros are needed as just having JR's is missing out on people with experience know that the book says this but in the real IT systems doing it this way works better in the good IT classes aka ones at community colleges and tech schools teach like that as well as a lot of them are IT pros and know what it is right.

  35. The problem is money. by Harkin · · Score: 1

    Last I checked I'd have a hard time considering most of the people arrested by the FBI "world class" hackers. The majority of Black Hat hackers are generally scriptkiddies. Most of the best (the ones who do it to see if they can) are either Grey or White already work for a security firm which pays FAR better then the government would. If the gov wants to hire the best hackers then they need to start offering better pay then giving the excuse âoeyou get the warm fuzzy feeling that your protecting your country, isn't that worth at least 20% or more?â

  36. Re:I got first post :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    From what I see, if the US government has to reach to the hacking culture, they need to "atone" for Operation Sun Devil. Right now, at best, they can get contractors because of this. Unlike China where their citizens will happily go to a computer room and start doing their work.

    The pogrom against Steve Jackson Games and other sites forever made any person with non-tivial skillz not interested in any way to work for the US, just for fear that they will be labeled a "terrorist" should something happened, and burned at the stake.

    The US government needs to view blackhats and whitehats as the same as soldiers, and give them the same respect. No, a guy doing fake VoIP calls in order to get a network topology so he can scout it with nmap is not as awe-inspiring as a Navy SEAL who racks up body counts. But the guy at the keyboard is as important if not more to an operation.

  37. I don't trust people who are not open by bodhisattva · · Score: 2

    Did anyone see "Catch Me If You Can"? True story. The FBI hired a master conterfeiter and con-man. Trust? Both the CIA and the FBI have vetted guys and moved them to high posts while they were working for the KGB. With a hacker you know what you're getting. They have to decide whether they want to protect their country from enemies, foreign and domestic. Don't expect them to jump on board with massive personal intrusion, expect them to go after bad guys. They have to accept that they are going to watched, tapped, bugged, whatever, as part of the job.

    By the way, polygraph tests are a joke. Aldrich Ames had to take a ploygraph test. His KGB handlers told him not to worry, get a good night's sleep and be friendly with the testers. He passed of course. Anyone can beat it and with some mild drugs they might as well be giving the test to a corpse. Read "Telling Lies" and "Lie Spotting" and you'll be able to do a better job.

    1. Re:I don't trust people who are not open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polygraphs work just fine as what they are - a prop. It's an interrogation technique just like shining a light in the face of the person being interrogated is. Now I agree that if someone is saying that someone "failed" a polygraph test then that person has no idea what he's talking about - you only fail it by voluntarily giving up information that you didn't intend to (possibly even including information that you know to be false but that the interrogator wanted to hear).

  38. Re:No age rules, no boot camp, no medical disquali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    IT / Software folks arent that special, offensive network operations aren't magic, get over yourselves. Everyone in the military learns to function as an infantry man at least at a rudimentary level for a reason.

  39. This is our expert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "[Arquilla] was also a consultant on the 1995 cyber thriller The Net, starring Sandra Bullock"

    I don't know his other achievements, but I certainly wouldn't list this one.

  40. The vetting has already occurred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vetting has already occurred ... but not quite in the intended direction.

    The native experts of the net have vetted The Man and noted that he is the enemy.

    1. Re:The vetting has already occurred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

  41. A Key Realisation Has Not Occurred by DaKong · · Score: 1

    People in the US government have clearly failed to realise it's futile to recruit hackers to fight the enemy because THEY, the US govt., are the enemy.

    --
    If not us, who? If not now, when?
  42. Re:No age rules, no boot camp, no medical disquali by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    so a IT / Software person in a wheelchair can't be part of this due to them not being able to be a infantry man???

    Look at the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT.

  43. Hacker4Hire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We imprison our talent while other governments have already learned to embrace them...

  44. Cyberpanopticon doesn't need hackers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The military-industrial complex wants to scare people into giving them money to protect them against "cyber" whatever.

    The government wants to build out the CYBERPANOPTICON (a word I just coined!) to monitor everyone. They're doing it in the name of the Unholy Trinity, protecting people from copyright infringement, child porn, and terrorism. Later, once the cyberpanopticon is in place, they can use it for anything else they want.

    Where do hackers fit into this!?

  45. stuxnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are doing just fine.

  46. Radical Dude!!! by ozonearchitect · · Score: 1

    Oh wow, really dude? They're going to do like all the dozens of movies that have portrayed this kind of stuff already? Cool dude!!! What a joke the propaganda BS media has become. Very very insulting to our intelligence indeed.

  47. Huh? by ozonearchitect · · Score: 1

    So it's a heinous act of war if it's done to the US (which it has been countless times already unknowingly to the public), but it's business as usual if we do it to other countries? Gotcha.

  48. Re:No age rules, no boot camp, no medical disquali by i286NiNJA · · Score: 2

    You can sign up for SPAWAR as a civilian... many SPAWAR employees end up becoming navy reserve officers and show up in uniform once a month so they can get extra money.

    They're actively recruiting hacking events.

  49. Transcending to a new paradigm by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    "all its done in the past 40 years is act as an engine of misery, destruction and sorrow across the globe."

    Because it is ironic? http://www.pdfernhout.net/recognizing-irony-is-a-key-to-transcending-militarism.html
    "Likewise, even United States three-letter agencies like the NSA and the CIA, as well as their foreign counterparts, are becoming ironic institutions in many ways. Despite probably having more computing power per square foot than any other place in the world, they seem not to have thought much about the implications of all that computer power and organized information to transform the world into a place of abundance for all. Cheap computing makes possible just about cheap everything else, as does the ability to make better designs through shared computing. ... There is a fundamental mismatch between 21st century reality and 20th century security thinking. Those "security" agencies are using those tools of abundance, cooperation, and sharing mainly from a mindset of scarcity, competition, and secrecy. Given the power of 21st century technology as an amplifier (including as weapons of mass destruction), a scarcity-based approach to using such technology ultimately is just making us all insecure. Such powerful technologies of abundance, designed, organized, and used from a mindset of scarcity could well ironically doom us all whether through military robots, nukes, plagues, propaganda, or whatever else... Or alternatively, as Bucky Fuller and others have suggested, we could use such technologies to build a world that is abundant and secure for all."

    See also: http://www.pdfernhout.net/on-dealing-with-social-hurricanes.html
    "This approximately 60 page document is a ramble about ways to ensure the CIA (as well as other big organizations) remains (or becomes) accountable to human needs and the needs of healthy, prosperous, joyful, secure, educated communities. The primarily suggestion is to encourage a paradigm shift away from scarcity thinking & competition thinking towards abundance thinking & cooperation thinking within the CIA and other organizations. I suggest that shift could be encouraged in part by providing publicly accessible free "intelligence" tools and other publicly accessible free information that all people (including in the CIA and elsewhere) can, if they want, use to better connect the dots about global issues and see those issues from multiple perspectives, to provide a better context for providing broad policy advice. It links that effort to bigger efforts to transform our global society into a place that works well for (almost) everyone that millions of people are engaged in. A central Haudenosaunee story-related theme is the transformation of Tadodaho through the efforts of the Peacemaker from someone who was evil and hurtful to someone who was good and helpful. ..."

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  50. Those who fail to learn from history... by Svartormr · · Score: 1

    Like that really worked for Brittain when they failed to properly vette a generation of intelligence officers in the 1930's and 1940's. And ended up having to do it all post-haste in the 1960's and 1970's. And when the United States cheerfully trained and armed a large number of irregular soldiers in Latin America and Asia in the 1980's. And are still fighting their remnants in the Wars on Drugs and Terror.

  51. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they are already doing that. For example the guys who wrote Stuxnet.

  52. You keep using that word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Arquilla makes his living by delivering instruction to US military officers. I am frankly disgusted to know that a person in that position is willing and eager to apply the terminology of war to the task of securing civilian computer networks.

    War, really? Let's see what Dr. Arquilla's distinguished predecessors have to say on the subject:

    War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world.

    To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

    From the Judgment of the International Military Tribunal for the Trial of German Major War Criminals at Nuremburg, 1946.

    Pretty brutal, yes? I would certainly hope that Dr. Aquilla had the sense to consider this before he started spouting off about "cyberwar" to people whose decisions directly shape the military policy of the United States. Not everyone is going to possess the same appreciation for metaphor that he would appear to have.

  53. Vetting? by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 1

    If your security depends on "vetting" you've already lost.

  54. Re:I got first post :P by lightknight · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Any "hacker" worth his / her salt is already being actively scouted by various interested parties offering may more money and morally-casual environments than the Defense industry.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  55. Hacking is a skill, not a culture by hessian · · Score: 1

    What happened in the 1980s may have been a culture, but hacking is a skill, like programming, or spying, or forensics.

    You can teach it, if you find the intelligent and dedicated people.

    The problem is that government alienates such people. First, it's heavy on rules and regulations (a/k/a "conservative"); second, it's designed to reward participation instead of excellence (egalitarianism, a liberal trait).

    If you want to know why hackers, artists and philosophers end up alone in vans down by the river, it's because they can't stand your stultifying society. Don't try to bring them into it and crush what's great about them; instead, fix your society so that it nurtures such traits.

  56. Re:I got first post :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe if they stopped arresting all of them, some of them might like the idea of working for their country, but as long as their country is out to get them you won't find many employees. also you would have to open up your restrictions (drugs, petty crime, image) just for anyone to pass the process and get high level security passes. Now if it was more like china they might stand a chance. I see adds for asio and defence signals here on Slashdot all the time, but i know anyone that could actually pass the selection process would be some stupid goody two shoes who's never gotten there hands dirty, and wouldn't be any use to them any way.

  57. Romantic nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are of course exceptions, but the best hackers in the world aren't the counter culture idiots and traditional stereotyipcal "cool hacker" people.

    For the most part, like anything else, it's giong to be experience, highly educated professionals of the pocket protector variety. They may try to blend in a little bit more these days, but they're still nerds and not hipsters.

  58. Uhh, who do you think wrote Stuxnet? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    It was far more likely to be the pocket protector MIT/Caltech brigade than the idiotic stereotypical "hacker" with his tattoos and piercings.

    The anti-government "Anonymous" type hackers are little children compared to the people the government has access to, I doub't they're looking to slum and are too worried about being unable to hire the anti-establishment set.

  59. read this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20120714134405734&title=us+issues+with+hackers&type=article&order=&hideanonymous=0&pid=991219#c991349

    perfectly explains why they won't hire anyone but the worst greedy money grubbing evil humans that can't be trusted , and yea that will come back to haunt them.....

    ill die first and rather live the rest of my days on disability being poor.....YET HAPPY they cannot use my knowledge for evil.

  60. Stuxnets basic design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hi there back in late 90's me and a lad form the us military worked on a a whole suite a stuff , it was not a pay job just exchanges of knowledge....i got all his work and he mine , i broke that tie a long time ago and it will never happen again.

    I will tell you things like the sony rootkit , and filesharing stuff and virii were all made very very automated and made to hide and do a ton of real world crazy stuff.

    hacking is not a skill. its a lifestyle.....and a mindset....you can't have me work for you cause i do not fit the droned out , stiff lifestyle of a 9-5 job....my ideal of freedom and democracy are far more people orientated while yours are consumer and control driven...i break controls.....i live beyond them and that you cant change.....

    anyone that claims its a skill doesn't have the skills or brainbpower to realize all this and that all the net and all we are and see is but the patterns of the programming....if i change the pattern the program changes just like how i change your programming i change you.

    this level of control over people can never be allowed to happen to be in only one persons hands. IT IS TRULY FORBIDDEN.
    it would be the atomic bomb of bombs....

  61. McKinnon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you dummies remember that hole in pentagon before that was had for 7 years that YOU DIDNT realize and then one idiot got caught in the usa and hired for 6 figures?

    you hire the people that get caught and thats your failing....

    when you want to talk you and your govt know where i am...i do not hide....
    feel free to send one of the 280 + fbi agents over you have stashed away in my nation that our own govt lies about....

    CHRoNoSS

  62. offer made 15 years ago - arrests followed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    main reaosn so few hackers will ever consider workign fo rhtem is this:

    you offered two peeps came they got there and you promptly arrested them
    GOOD JOB you ruined any chance for yourselves for direct work form any legit hacker.

    you want to deal come find me you can compensate our org with large sums a cash we might do some work for you.
    A) WE dont get involved in petty stupid wars
    B) We knew about lolsec almost right after his arrest....think how suddenly other anon's also are or went down too, and its focus has shifted to asia ...odd no?
    C) We will reserve the right to say screw you at any time we feel any action in not in the people's best interest.
    D) read C)

    Doubt we can be of much help...OH and one more demand
    drop all IP related issues from TPP , ACTA, and tell that puppet in canada to drop IP stuff in CETA that resembles ACTA
    DO this and you are starting to get good faith. Ask yourselves what is more import a 30 billion industry or a 6 trillion one ( the rest of the economy ) and start looking like your representing your people and stop taking all the god damn bribes....looks like nixon would have loved to live in this time.

    1. Re:offer made 15 years ago - arrests followed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you chronoss2010...don't worry I'm on your side ;-)