Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Invites Hackers To Attack Its Network

An anonymous reader writes "Nearly a year ago, Facebook introduced its bug bounty program, inviting security researchers to poke around the site, discover vulnerabilities that could compromise the integrity or privacy of Facebook user data, and then responsibly disclose them to the company. Still, when the social network's security team received a tip from a researcher about a vulnerability in the company's own network which would allow attackers to eavesdrop on internal communications, they made an unprecedented choice by broadened the scope of the bug bounty program and inviting researchers to search for other holes in the corporate network. Nobody expects malicious attackers to have a change of heart and hand over information about a vulnerability for a few thousand dollars when they could sell the stole information for much more. It should, therefore, come as no surprise that Ryan McGeehan, the manager of Facebook's security-incident response unit, stated that if there's a million-dollar bug, they will pay it out."

157 comments

  1. stay frosty, bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u know how we do

  2. Grammar! by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Holy hellbore, editors! At least read through the summary before letting it out onto the page teeming with grammatical errors. It reads like it was written by a grade schooler.

    --
    Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    1. Re:Grammar! by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Well that escalated quickly...

      "Troll" moderation? Oh please, if anything, this is "Offtopic", but certainly not trolling. The summary is badly written, a grammatical wreck, there's no denying that. There's no denying that there are editors, either. And there's also no denying that as editors, verifying the accuracy, correctness, sources, and presentation of the summaries posted is their responsibility in the end. In this case, they failed their job, and I'm right to call attention to that.

      As for your ad hominem attacks, you're going to have to do better than that to even faze me. Try going to logical, coherent arguments, and skip that part about the redundancy of language due to context, bad grammar is bad, redundancy or not.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    2. Re:Grammar! by bryonak · · Score: 1

      Seems like you're being trolled by someone with mod points copy-pasting the same ad hominem stuff anonymously and downvoting reasonable replies. Don't worry, it'll correct itself.

      Personally my French writing sucks and I'm thankful for people pointing out possible corrections - they help me improve. Reading a correct and nicely formulated writeup is simply more efficient than having to figure out what the author is trying to convey. It's the editors' job to pay attention to that, so yes, your kind is welcome here.

  3. VERY GOOD/SMART by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is using the enemy against "himself", & at the same time, strengthening themselves also.

    APK

    P.S.=> I've said this before & I'll say it again: The 1 "good" thing hacker/cracker types do, is show what needs "shoring up" (but, admittedly, that's about it). Just making "lemonade out of lemons" on that note...

    ... apk

    1. Re:VERY GOOD/SMART by Teresita · · Score: 1

      I'd say Facebook was doing a very good job annihilating itself with their $38 IPO now down 37% and the clunky Timeline UI. I'd be hard pressed to think of an external black-hat operation that could top those two self-inflicted wounds. Maybe porn site ad popups with loud audio of womenfolk enjoying themselves which you can't turn off, even when you are at Mass or in a very important interview. That might be a worthy hack.

    2. Re:VERY GOOD/SMART by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the IPO a good thing for facebook?

      Just think about it. They managed to trick people into putting much more money into the company then what it was worth. That money is still in the company now, even if the stock price crashed.

    3. Re:VERY GOOD/SMART by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that most of it went into the pockets of early investors like Goldman Sachs.

  4. There's a bug by vawarayer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Annoying Facebook Games.

    1. Re:There's a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a billion dollars, instead of instagram they could have figured out how to not piss off users. The bug is fixing what isn't broken

    2. Re:There's a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reported facebook.com as a bug. I can't wait to be paid for this million-dollar bug.

  5. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A PhD in English is certainly not required to ensure good communication. You've fallen victim to the Fallacy of Grey - "not a professional in English teaching" is not the same thing as "unable to communicate well". Strive for perfection in everything you do, as Sir Henry Royce tells us.

  6. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have an account? Nope. Go away troll, your kind is NOT wanted here.

    Of course, neither do I!

  7. I can log in with someone else's cookie. by DerUberTroll · · Score: 1

    Plain and simple.

    1. Re:I can log in with someone else's cookie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DerUberTroll stole the cookie from the cookie jar.

    2. Re:I can log in with someone else's cookie. by DerUberTroll · · Score: 1

      It is true. Make several accounts and try it. You'll see. I don't take credit for this find. I was told this and I tried it.

    3. Re:I can log in with someone else's cookie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that humor? Of course, one can login with someone else's cookie. That's true of every website out here!

    4. Re:I can log in with someone else's cookie. by John+Holmes · · Score: 1

      Without providing credentials?

    5. Re:I can log in with someone else's cookie. by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      One remotely feasible attack to get someone's cookie?

      Easy to do on your own computer. Trickier on any larger scale.

  8. A million is pandering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...It should, therefore, come as no surprise that Ryan McGeehan, the manager of Facebook's security-incident response unit, stated that if there's a million-dollar bug, they will pay it out."

    Wow, a whole million, eh? Nothing like devaluing your company's lifesblood down to chump change.

    It should come as no surprise to Ryan McGeehan when someone sells out their data for 10 million, or perhaps 20. And if Facebook doesn't think the value of that data is worth it, they're either being very naive or downright stupid.

  9. cost vs risk = capitalism? by SpzToid · · Score: 2

    OK, so I'm the Facebook corp. and I run a cost vs. risk analysis and come up with the numbers and resulting decision we see here today. Clearly they have the money, and the relative risk plus technical infrastructure so they figure this works out for them.

    OK, let's say I'm a Blackhat criminal hacker, poking around the Facebook network doing nasty stuff all the time, as best as I can, because this is what I do. And one day I get caught by Facebook or someone else along those lines. I am so busted. But wait, I can explain I was really a white hat all along, just trying to feed my family the best I can. Whatever happens next can't be too bad, and I'll live to fight another day. So then I figure capitalism rocks. Also maybe I'll see what Facebook offers when I really find a big hole worth exploiting.

    Win, win, and so captilism = security?

    There must be something I am not seeing here. Could such pure capitalism do something about all those evil Chinese and Russian and Ukranian hackers too? That which laws and police cannot really do very well at this time?

    To look at this another way, the US/Israeli State Resources behind Flame and Stuxnet (etc.) seem to have been fairly successful doing harm.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    1. Re:cost vs risk = capitalism? by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      There must be something I am not seeing here. Could such pure capitalism do something about all those evil Chinese and Russian and Ukranian hackers too?

      If the payout for playing for white hat team was guaranteed to be better, I could see a lot of those motivated by money to be swayed over.

    2. Re:cost vs risk = capitalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While paying high bounties can make it worth for a blackhat to sell the exploit to you instead of selling it to the Russian mafia (there are some caveats: what guarantees do you have he won't sell to both? what guarantees does he have you won't throw him in jail forever?), on the other hand it acts as an incentive to find exploits in your system. So you end with a potentially expensive (or inexpensive, depending on many variables), secure, and very highly targeted system. As long as you pay better than everyone else, great you're secure. But the moment someone with a bigger wallet comes along (and if you have something of value to exploit they will) you're screwed as you have basically paid to train an army of criminals in exploiting your system.

      Also maybe I'll see what Facebook offers when I really find a big hole worth exploiting.

      Maybe. But considering the number of blackhats who were tricked by companies, if I were you I'd prefer to sell it to (other) criminals instead. Better safe than sorry. Or sell to both criminals and Facebook, and use a different fake identity every time you deal with Facebook.

  10. You've a victim of delusions of grandeur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In your thinking you're certified to critique others writing, when you're clearly not.If you can't gather the meaning of words from within the context in which they are written, it is clearly YOU with the problem. Get out your hooked on phonics and get on topic, troll.

    1. Re:You've a victim of delusions of grandeur by hawguy · · Score: 0, Troll

      In your thinking you're certified to critique others writing, when you're clearly not.If you can't gather the meaning of words from within the context in which they are written, it is clearly YOU with the problem. Get out your hooked on phonics and get on topic, troll.

      English good not need here. Me right any way me can and you no understand than it meen you stupid. me not.

  11. Pot calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get on topic, you off topic troll. Get a life.

  12. I peed a little by houghi · · Score: 2

    I peed a little when I read compromise the integrity or privacy of Facebook user data. If they think that would be the result from a hack, then having an account means you are a hacker.
    If you subscribe and don't use your real name, you must be a 1337 Hax0r

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  13. Fairly cynical view... by mspohr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Nobody expects malicious attackers to have a change of heart and hand over information about a vulnerability for a few thousand dollars when they could sell the stole information for much more. "
    I really don't think that all hackers are greedy. While there are hackers who are willing to take the risks of selling hacks to criminals, there are probably many hackers who would be interested in exploring vulnerabilities for a modest legal reward.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Fairly cynical view... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      And how many actually have contacts to sell that kind of stuff?

    2. Re:Fairly cynical view... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says malicious attackers. I don't believe it's making a blanket statement.

    3. Re:Fairly cynical view... by Capt.+Skinny · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This won't cause black hats to have a change of heart, but it will bring more white hats to the table by giving them more of an incentive.

  14. Inviting crime to our personal data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inviting crime to our personal data, good show facebook, are you trying to drive us away?

    I do not welcome deliberate encouragement and funding of crime on my personal profile.

    Yet more reasons to leave Facebook. This is not the way to test your product, you do REWARD people for ATTACKING the people that are giving you your bread and butter. Without us you HAVE NO INFORMATION TO SELL.

  15. Makes sense by JanneM · · Score: 1

    Just count each successful attack as another active user. I guess every bit helps when your stock value is on the line.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  16. DNS hack by ralferix · · Score: 2

    I tried going to Facebook today, didn't come up so decided to checkout Slashdod since I could see other sites, I find this story about Facebook inviting hackers on DefCON weekend. Well, seems my DNS doesn't resolve them, is this widespread? C:\Users\r>ping facebook.com Ping request could not find host facebook.com. Please check the name and try again.

  17. Severe lack of trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, come hack our site! And if you suceed, we'll turn you in to the police.

    This sort of competition requires a large amount of trust on both sides. I see far too much potential for:
    1) Facebook to claim that legitimate contenders were actual hackers and have them arrested (either unintentially or intentionally).
    2) Legitimate hackers that get caught to claim that they were only taking part in the hacking competition.

    I think that there are few people who trust Facebook, and with good reason. One thing you can be certain of is that they will be logging all hacking attempts.

  18. Not on topic, however... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may be right. Selling "intangibles" like advertising is b.s. that's wrecking the United States (in part), imo at least. Domestic manufacturing & food production kept this nation STRONG via internal employment of the citizenry as well as exports of actual physical goods. We don't DO much of THAT anymore, unfortunately.

    Why? Greed.

    See - I was told that the "service economy" was coming in the early to mid 1980's in my 1st of 2 degrees and I told the professor "It won't work. Most guys want to go do their 6-2/7-3/8-4/9-5 job in a factory (or like environs on those hourly schedules) that's unionized for stability and security, go home, eat dinner, spend time with kids, do household chores & yardwork, drink a beer, make love to the wife, go to sleep and get up the next day and do it again - the familiarity of routine! There's only so many chiefs needed and far more indians to account for and keep happy. A nation's composed of individuals, and individuals form societies. Happy individuals make for happy AND ECONOMICALLY HEALTHY societies".

    He threatened I might fail that economics class, to which I told him

    "When you learn to *think* for yourself, instead of spitting back what "FORBES" magazine is feeding you? Then you can make statements like that, and I have plenty of witnesses here in class to your threat. Try it, let's see what happens when I go WAY over your head if you do that..."

    (Needless to say, I passed that class with a good grade too!)

    * My point is that this ENTIRE fiasco in the economy was being FED TO US as far back as that, & imo in a "seize the youth, seize the future" type thing, and possibly earlier, to aid in creating this mess, today (all so that the "investment class" could profit by the easiest means possible - payroll control!). Take away disposable income (monies beyond necessities like food, rent/mortgage, etc.), you take that away from the people, creating a hand-to-mouth minimum wage ridden "economy", and ruin eventually.

    (Between that & the dishonesties being practiced in government, banking, stock markets, and corporate Amerika? We have, what we have... what a shame, it really is... I've been alive for 1/2 a century now almost & watched things get bad. Really, bad...)

    APK

    P.S.=> I saw this coming a LONG time ago, even as a "green kid" (not that I am the 'wisest guy there is', FAR from it), but even then? I knew we were heading for problems, and here we are, today... unbelievable greed is @ the root/heart of it, imo... apk

  19. Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And WHAT could possibly go wrong?!

  20. I officially hacked Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I became an advertisement company, gave Zuck a fist full of dollars, and now have full access to everything you do!
    Officially I'm even considered "part of the company", and hence "no information was passed on to third parties". :P

  21. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by multisync · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do you have a PhD in English? Are you a certified and licensed instructor in that language in written form with many years of professional experiencing teaching it?? I doubt it. Go away troll.

    I don't have a PhD in English, but I don't need one to tell you "broadened" is the wrong tense. The second sentence should read, in part,

    they made an unprecedented choice by broadening the scope of the bug bounty program

    instead of the way it is currently written.

    This has nothing to do with language "evolving" or grammar police; they made a mistake that breaks one of the syntax rules of the language, and it should be corrected.

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  22. Cheap by Patch86 · · Score: 1

    Although I can see the appeal of something like "bug bounties", I can't help but feel that it's basically testing on the cheap. As an IT professional, it feels a bit like devaluing a highly skilled career; or at best, making testers nothing but self-employed, pay-as-you-go workers rather than full employees or traditional contractors.

    I mean, what Facebook are basically offering is "no win no fee" Penetration Testing. Rather than paying a team of certified, experienced Pen Testers to run a thorough and comprehensive report, they're saying "yeah, do a Pen Test, but we'll only pay you if you find anything wrong". Not only that, but "we'll only pay you properly if you find something really wrong". And if Facebook have actually managed to inadvertently make their system secure, they'll get to find that out via 100's of hours of free testing.

    Bug bounties to encourage end-users to post proper bug reports is one thing, but this seems like a slightly grubby step too far to me.

  23. Another option to consider (custom hosts files) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Custom hosts "hardcodes" of your favorites of their "IP address to host-domain name 'equation'" in line records in hosts can overcome that crap too & help. That's in addition to my initial post reply to you here -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40801585 on filtering DNS servers.

    DNS has KNOWN issues, & can be "redirect poisoned" over ports 51/53. Hosts help "skirt that issue", take a LONG read (but a detailed one as to why):

    I use hosts in the following ways (see my 'p.s.' below, in detail, for your reference) to COMPLIMENT & OVERCOME THOSE PROBLEMS IN DNS & OTHER MECHANISMS LARGELY!

    Custom hosts files gain me the following benefits (A short summary of where custom hosts files can be extremely useful):

    ---

    1.) Blocking out malware/malscripted sites
    2.) Blocking out Known sites-servers/hosts-domains that are known to serve up malware
    3.) Blocking out Bogus DNS servers malware makers use
    4.) Blocking out Botnet C&C servers
    5.) Blocking out Bogus adbanners that are full of malicious script content
    6.) Getting you back speed/bandwidth you paid for by blocking out adbanners + hardcoding in your favorite sites (faster than remote DNS server resolution)
    7.) Added reliability (vs. downed or misdirect/poisoned DNS servers).
    8.) Added "anonymity" (to an extent, vs. DNS request logs)
    9.) The ability to bypass DNSBL's (DNS block lists you may not agree with).
    10.) More screen "real estate" (since no more adbanners appear onscreen eating up CPU, Memory, & other forms of I/O too - bonus!)
    11.) Truly UNIVERSAL PROTECTION (since any OS, even on smartphones, usually has a BSD drived IP stack).
    12.) Faster & MORE EFFICIENT operation vs. browser plugins (which "layer on" ontop of Ring 3/RPL 3/usermode browsers - whereas the hosts file operates @ the Ring 0/RPL 0/Kernelmode of operation (far faster) as a filter for the IP stack itself...)
    13.) Blocking out TRACKERS
    14.) Custom hosts files work on ANY & ALL webbound apps (browser plugins do not).
    15.) Custom hosts files offer a better, faster, more efficient way, & safer way to surf the web & are COMPLETELY controlled by the end-user of them.

    ---

    * & FAR more... read on below IF you are interested (for detail).

    AND, for those of you that run Microsoft Windows 32 or 64 bit? An automated hosts file creation & mgt. program:

    http://securemecca.com/public/APKHostsFileInstaller/2012_06_01/APKHostsFileEngineInstaller32_64bit.exe.zip

    (You simply extract its files to ANY folder you like (usually one you create for it, doesn't matter where, but you MUST run it as administrator (simple & the "read me" tab shows how easy THAT is to do))

    What's it do for you?

    It's a custom hosts file mgt. program that does the following for end users (Calling it "APK Hosts File Engine 5.0++") after it obtains custom hosts file data from 12 of the reputable & reliable sources listed below:

    ---

    1.) Offers massively noticeable increased speed for websurfing via blocking adbanners

    2.) Offers increased speed for users fav. sites by hardcoding them into the hosts file for faster IP address-to-host/domain name resolutions (which sites RARELY change their hosting providers, e.g.-> of 250 I do, only 6 have changed since 2006 - & when sites do because they found a less costly hosting provider? Then, they either email notify members, put up warnings on their pages, & do IP warnings & redirectors onto the former IP address range to protect vs. the unscrupulous criminal bidding on that range to buy it to steal from users of say, online banking or shopping sites).

    3.) Better "Layered-Security"/"Defense-In-Depth" via blocking host-domain based attacks by KNOWN bad sites-servers that

  24. What's worth attacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait... FB has data that's worth attacking? This really is news to me.

  25. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by RicardoGCE · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your kind is NOT wanted here.

    The average Slashdot summary makes this very, very evident.

  26. Downmoderation shows otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Grammar Nazi"/"English Professor" wannabe got downmodded though, lol -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40801239 . Slashdot readers told him where to go and the ratings illustrate that, clearly.

  27. Thanks for proving my point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understood you perfectly, regardless of your writing style (doubtless intentional, but possibly not (as you may have actual difficulties writing English say, due to being a non-english speaker/writer)). So, once more: If you can't gather the meaning of words from within the context in which they are written, it is clearly YOU with the problem! The wannabe "english professor"/"grammar nazi" was put in his place by a TROLL downmod by the community here who by that down moderation has basically stated "go away troll".

  28. PHP by Bengie · · Score: 0
    And here I thought someone was poking fun at FB using PHP. http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/

    Virtually every feature in PHP is broken somehow. The language, the framework, the ecosystem, are all just bad. And I can’t even point out any single damning thing, because the damage is so systemic.

    fun read

  29. This was stated earlier and I agree with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't gather the meaning of words from within the context in which they are written, it is clearly YOU with the problem. You're in no position to critique others' writing either. What exactly qualifies you on that grounds?? Your MERE "opinion"??? Please... get over yourself, and get on topic.

  30. Re:Options for "DNSBL filtered 'secured'" DNS serv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good post. Thanks for the info (can't see why you're downmodded though).

  31. Re:Options for "DNSBL filtered 'secured'" DNS serv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't you give me some information about the hosts file? You probably don't know about that, maybe a little too advanced for you.

  32. Stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the hackers who just want the data, not the money? They will be masked by all the script kiddies with dollar signs in their eyes.

  33. Am I missing something? Buy bugs from black-hats? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    If they care about paying the right price for the bugs, why not just buy the existing exploits from the black-hats? Hackers get paid what the bug is ACTUALLY worth (on the black market), you fix even more bugs, driving more folks to search for cracks, driving bug price down, everyone's happy?

    I get that white hatters are beneficial, but I'd still be careful attaching my name to a "bug bounty". They can throw you in jail for white hat hacking at a whim -- It's still illegal by the retarding letter of the law.

  34. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    a big problem with "its not a formal document so FOAD" is that not making the effort can transfer to YOUR CODE the folks that try to use more formal grammar are just not wanting to let that kind of language laziness pass.

    Okay so we shouldn't be arguing between NYT and Yale commas but dumping a complete trainwreck of language in and then claiming Not Formal so I CAN HAZ EROARS is Bollocks.

    (and yes i know that i was not perfect myself but i at least used the Builtin spellcheck and tried)

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  35. You need to be more observant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was already posted long ago here as well -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40802123 FAR predating your post...

    * So much for that from you...

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "Can't you give me some information about the hosts file? You probably don't know about that, maybe a little too advanced for you." - by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 28, @12:48PM (#40802123)

    "Read 'em & weep" above... However, I suspect you don't read well, based on proof of my statements, & your BLATANT error...

    ... apk

  36. You need to be more observant... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was already posted long ago here as well -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40801683 FAR predating your post I am replying to now...

    * So much for that from you...

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "Can't you give me some information about the hosts file? You probably don't know about that, maybe a little too advanced for you." - by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 28, @12:48PM (#40802123)

    "Read 'em & weep" above... However, I suspect you don't read well, based on proof of my statements, & your BLATANT error...

    ... apk

    1. Re:You need to be more observant... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent job APK: Burning a troll with his own mistake.

  37. Funny offtopic TBird can't deny this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40801849

    "Seems like you're being trolled by someone with mod points copy-pasting the same ad hominem stuff anonymously and downvoting reasonable replies. Don't worry, it'll correct itself. - by bryonak (836632) on Saturday July 28, @01:08PM (#40802289)

    Seems like you're another easily made sockpuppet alternate registered 'luser' account of ThunderBird's obviously (like THAT fools anyone around here, as we've seen it many times before) "suddenly defending him" on his obvious off topic wannabe english critic statements (lol).

    Don't worry, it'll correct itself. - by bryonak (836632) on Saturday July 28, @01:08PM (#40802289)

    Oh, it did long ago: Tbird was downmoderated!

    1. Re:Funny offtopic TBird can't deny this by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Check the UIDs: bryonak registered long before I did, and for the record, I don't play dirty like trolls do: everything I do on this site is connected to this single account, be it a good or bad thing, and I responsibly take all replies and karma-deltas for what I do and say.

      However, it's not hard to notice that the replies are all the same, word-for-word, and all are attacks directed against my person, not against my points. As such, they carry no weight, only noise.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    2. Re:Funny offtopic TBird can't deny this by bryonak · · Score: 1

      Note: never directly reply to someone you have positively identified as troll (aka feeding), especially if it's APK... there will be no reasonable discussion and he's wasting a shitload of time twisting words (everyone may spend their time as they see fit though).
      I even will not be going to read all that text in reply to your posting, because I'm sure there isn't anything worthwhile in there.

      The UID thing is trivial enough for everyone to see, assuming the average /.er still has a working intellect as they used to. Those actually interested usually skim through the account posting history to check if there's a rhetorical or topical connection between two accounts.

      And the moderation system seems to work as expected, seeing how your initially downmodded comments are up again.

  38. Absolutely LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for that humor and you're probably correct.

  39. Facebook needs a GOJF card "ap" by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    I if i was going to try for the money then i would detail my efforts and then not give the info to FaceBook before i get issued a GOJF card (i would also have a Trusted Third Party monitor things so FB can't say "you used your hack to steal X from us beyond what was needed to prove the hack")

    If FB won't play ball then the info goes up on "HackBay" on a 12 million dollar reserve

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  40. You're downmodded troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off topic and all: Accept it. Grammar nazis always fail.

    Check the UIDs: bryonak registered long before I did by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @01:44PM (#40802511)

    First - Should we nominate you for 'sainthood' because you're stupid enough to have a registered 'luser' account (many of them as I suspect as do others here) that makes you an easily tracked sheep? Secondly - that doesn't mean you're just he posting under this account this time. Get one thing clear/straight: We all KNOW how many people keep alternate registered 'luser' sockpuppet accounts here!

    I don't play dirty like trolls do: everything I do on this site is connected to this single account, be it a good or bad thing, and I responsibly take all replies and karma-deltas for what I do and say.by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @01:44PM (#40802511)

    See above, "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat"... pretty simple, & yes - the /. community is aware that happens too, and is the dirtiest trick of all. HBGary ring a bell?

    However, it's not hard to notice that the replies are all the same, word-for-word, and all are attacks directed against my person, not against my points. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @01:44PM (#40802511)

    Oh, really? They're directed to the fact you are off topic, and think you're "the great critic" of others' writing (with no real credentials on your part to be able to do so and have a little street cred on that account). Get over yourself. Once more:

    IF YOU CAN'T GATHER THE MEANING OF WORDS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE CONTEXT IN WHICH THEY'RE USED, IT IS YOU WITH THE PROBLEM!

    As such, they carry no weight, only noise.by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @01:44PM (#40802511)

    Ahem: A downmoderation of your blatantly off topic initial post by the community here shows otherwise http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40801239 YOU FAIL! Your person is off topic. No questions asked: Argue with that fact.

    1. Re:You're downmodded troll by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Says the Anonymous Coward, who's even afraid to show his handle. You don't know anything about people's usage habits and accounts, or if you're a site admin who does, prove it. You can do that by, say, publishing my IP address. You should be able to access the logs if you're an admin and know exactly who are my "sock puppet" accounts. So go on, prove it to everyone that I'm a dirty, cheating, sock puppet-using troll. I'm waiting.
      Of course I'll be waiting a long time: if you do have access to those logs, and look up my IP, you'll see only one account uses it: this one.

      As for being off topic with my initial comment, I accept that, never denied it either. However, I maintain my point that the summary, as it is now, should never have seen the light of the front page. At the very least, the editor posting it should have looked it over and corrected any mistakes to produce a summary befitting the site.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    2. Re:You're downmodded troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's APK - the writing style is quite recognizable, as is the insistence that he is always correct and never the one with the problem. Don't bother with him, you're wasting your time and energy getting that loon to go back on a position once his mind made up.

  41. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no doubt ThunderBird is off topic and clearly has the problem here. That problem? Stated as plainly as is possible as it was here earlier: If you can't gather the meaning of words from within the context in which they are written, it is clearly YOU with the problem. So much for Grammar Nazis, as ThunderBird was down moderated and rightfully so because he is an off topic troll.

  42. Pot calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says the Anonymous Coward, who's even afraid to show his handle. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    Now who's guilty of ad hominem attacks? "Do not as I do, do as I say", eh?? Please... lol - you've only shown us that not only are you a wannabe english writing critic (with no real credentials or qualifications on that account), but that you're a pseudo logician too... lol!

    Have you also considered I may not even HAVE a registered 'luser' account here (much less many of them as I suspect you do along with others replying to your blatantly off topic trolling)?

    You don't know anything about people's usage habits and accounts, or if you're a site admin who does, prove it. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    Hmmm - Awfully 'defensive' there, talk about a DEAD GIVE AWAY (seems we struck a nerve, eh? Nothing hurts like the truth!) - also, as to knowing what is what on that account??

    How do you KNOW I don't???

    (Again - Your logic is weak, and easily overturned by reverse psychology)

    Fact: You don't know that I don't.

    You can do that by, say, publishing my IP address. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    Why would I do that and possibly break laws?

    You should be able to access the logs if you're an admin and know exactly who are my "sock puppet" accounts. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    Ahem: Anyone can use TOR and do that, so once more: Who do you *think" you are fooling?

    (Also, can't you be on topic, ever? Hence, you were downmoderated to TROLL status!)

    So go on, prove it to everyone that I'm a dirty, cheating, sock puppet-using troll. I'm waiting.by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    No need!

    You're "foaming at the mouth" overly defensive replies are doing the job nicely as well as your "defenders" who are, like you, off topic as all hell... lol!

    Of course I'll be waiting a long time: if you do have access to those logs, and look up my IP, you'll see only one account uses it: this one.by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    First of all, we'll be waiting for you to be on topic forevr, lol!

    Secondly/Again: "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" and re-read about TOR above, thanks (you're not doing very well, nor are your "defensive replies", overly so, either). Either your technical knowledge on that account is weak, or you *think* others here don't know how it's done.

    Again: See HBGary online... it's been done, busted, and well known.

    As for being off topic with my initial comment, I accept that, never denied it either. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    About time... With that said?

    Well, perhaps you should be at -1 TROLL then, right? After all, you were down moderated for being off topic and yes, a troll for that.

    However, I maintain my point that the summary, as it is now, should never have seen the light of the front page.by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    First, your "point" is OFF-TOPIC... get it? Oh, that's right - you do and admit it.

    Secondly - That's mere opinion from an off topic unqualified wannabe english writing critic, nothing more... what was it you called it? PURE NOISE!

    At the very least, the editor posting it should have looked it over and corrected any mistakes to produce a summary befitting the site.by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    Once more in regards to your off topic trolling you were down moderated for:

    IF YOU CAN'T GATHER THE MEANING OF WORDS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE CONTEXT IN WHICH THEY'RE USED, IT IS YOU WITH THE PROBLEM!

  43. If you can't gather the meaning of words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Within a framework of the context they're used in, you're the problem. No small wonder you were downmodded to trolldom for being off topic!

  44. AC off his meds by bmo · · Score: 1

    Your meds. Take them. Now.

    --
    BMO

  45. Quit projecting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How "original" (not) and weak. Is the "best defense" you have, that? You FAIL, troll, off topic as usual.

    1. Re:Quit projecting! by bmo · · Score: 1

      I was joking before. I'm not now.

      Take your meds.

  46. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Would you rather be corrected by well-meaning grammar lawyers, or continue making and compounding mistakes until you're writing in a language that may be difficult to receive by the intended audience?

    Consider what a failure to communicate may mean. In the case of the summary, a failure to receive the communication would be more detrimental to the reader than to the writer, but those roles can also be reversed when the author needs to be understood more than the recipient needs to understand. Also consider that some groups of recipients may reject communication attempts out of hand based on the style of the author, permanently excluding the author from interaction with those groups, which may have economic impact for the communicator.

    Dialect differentiation is one of the pillars of the gentrification of society. It offers a way for the elite to segregate themselves from the plebs, limiting social mobility. Those with access to the "rules of grammar" and the the training in them can easily spot others of the like.

    Do you still wish to avoid the pain of being corrected from time to time?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  47. Who was downmoderated? ThunderBird69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why?? He is off topic and admitted it even:

    "Troll" moderation? Oh please, if anything, this is "Offtopic", but certainly not trolling. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @12:05PM (#40801799)

    From http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40801799

    Are you so stupid you didn't see that much?

    As to my being anyone else like APK? Please: Quit trying to play "forensic investigator" already (you're not good at it).

    After all, the fact of the matter here, is this: It wouldn't matter who I was when the poster himself admits he was off topic and the fact he was downmoderated as a troll for it.

    1. Re:Who was downmoderated? ThunderBird69 by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      If you're going to quote my words, please give full context (since you seem to be so much into context), and include the rest of that paragraph, in which I explain just why I commented what I commented.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    2. Re:Who was downmoderated? ThunderBird69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to post here, please be on topic. Can you do that? Thank you.

  48. "Challenge accepted" by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

    Let me guess... 24 hours later the workstation on Mark Zuckerberg's desk had its hostname changed to challengeaccepted.facebook.com?

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  49. Let's use TBird's "logic" (as you post as AC) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quotes from ThunderBird69 (who admits being off topic and wonders why he was downmodded as a troll), from his own words and "pseudo logic" here http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40802713

    Prove it's APK. You're a coward posting as AC too and TBird cut that down also:

    Says the Anonymous Coward, who's even afraid to show his handle. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    and

    You don't know anything about people's usage habits and accounts, or if you're a site admin who does, prove it. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    and

    So go on, prove it to everyone that I'm a dirty, cheating, sock puppet-using troll. I'm waiting.by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    That said, from "the english grammar off topic nazi himself", your hero (lol, sock puppet is more like it) whom you "defend" and fail in? Once more - prove its apk.

    You can't, you fail, and it is hilarious. It is SO easy to get the better of you off topic trolls it is not even funny anymore. You need "brain upgrades", lol!

    (Funny you post as ac now too... lol!)

    Funniest part is this:

    as is the insistence that he is always correct and never the one with the problem by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 28, @02:57PM (#40803021)

    Funny TBird was downmoderated for being off topic and ADMITTING it too:

    As for being off topic with my initial comment, I accept that, never denied it either. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    Hence his downmoderation and continually being off topic. You too, and by TBird's reasoning? You fail yet again.

  50. Would you care to be on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once more so it "sinks in" (drink this in and digest it): If you can't gather the meaning of words within the framework of the context they're used in, you're the problem. Incidentally, the topic here is not english grammar you know! Writing style is pure opinion, like who's resume is better or worse. As long as the audience gets the message that is what is most important.

    1. Re:Would you care to be on topic? by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      Once more so it "sinks in" (drink this in and digest it): If you can't gather the meaning of words within the framework of the context they're used in, you're the problem. Incidentally, the topic here is not english grammar you know! Writing style is pure opinion, like who's resume is better or worse. As long as the audience gets the message that is what is most important.

      Yes, the audience getting the message is the most important thing. Yes, people can get the message despite spelling and grammar. And yes (although you didn't say it) pedantry about grammar is often just snobbery about education, thinly disguised.

      But none of the above dissuades me from prefering to a well-written sentence.

  51. How's this for a quote of YOUR words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As for being off topic with my initial comment, I accept that, never denied it either. by ThunderBird89 (1293256) on Saturday July 28, @02:12PM (#40802713)

    Facts: You admit to being off topic. You were downmodded for it! You can argue all you like but you are proving your detractors points for him since you cannot get on topic!

  52. Decriminalization by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    Now it's legal to hack their network. Which is a nice move for white hats, but it also gives black hats permission to fuck around with people's private data.

    Why not provide a copy of the facebook software with mock up data to which you give permission to hack.

  53. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grammar is important, twat.

  54. Re:Options for "DNSBL filtered 'secured'" DNS serv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I LOL'd. XD

    Well played.

  55. Chinese Characteristics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese do not need an invitation. What the West calls an "invitation" is construed there as a provocation.

  56. Re:Options for "DNSBL filtered 'secured'" DNS serv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I laughed at the idiot who posted this too http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40802123

  57. BMO = "the Projectionist" (lmao) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep projecting:. We can tell you need your meds loony boy!

  58. BMO = Biggest Mentalcase Online (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest Mentalcase Online keeps repeating himself, projecting his own issues in his taking medications to keep his loony brain in check: Hilarious!

    1. Re:BMO = Biggest Mentalcase Online (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha, good one. Fits mentalboy BMO perfectly (BMO = Biggest Mentalcase Online).

    2. Re:BMO = Biggest Mentalcase Online (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hurt the projecting mentalboy BMO's feelings, he quit posting.

    3. Re:BMO = Biggest Mentalcase Online (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll post again. His OCD and rage due to it demands it of him, lol!

  59. AC off his meds by bmo · · Score: 1

    I would taunt you, but taunting the mentally disabled is considered bad form.

    --
    BMO

  60. Important to a pusscake like you mentalboy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know your ADHD n' Dyslexia make it hard for you to read! However, it's not our fault you're a brain-damaged reject either.

  61. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Profanity's a last resort of off topic trolls like you. Take your meds.

  62. BMO = "Biggest Mentalcase Online" (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm taunting you, Biggest Mentalcase Online (lol, BMO) right here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40803801 so take your meds and quit projecting pusscake.

    1. Re:BMO = "Biggest Mentalcase Online" (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO! Love the acronym. Don't mind BMO. He forgot his meds again.

  63. Here's an opinion too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your grammar sucks, so you're not one to talk (or write).

  64. This is why trolls need to learn to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK dusted that troll with his trollish mistake here http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40802407

  65. For someone known as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest Mentalcase Online, don't talk. You attempt to project your own issues onto others and fail like usual. Now, go take those meds of yours you need nutter!

  66. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being on topic's more important. Thunderbird isn't on topic at all. He's a troll.

  67. AC off his meds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talking to yourself either online or offline is one sure way of convincing people that you are indeed crazy.

    Out here you can't point to your bluetooth earpiece and say that you were on the phone.

  68. Hello, Prune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prune, is that you? This aspie rage seems very familiar...

    1. Re:Hello, Prune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you do is go off topic. Why? You're a troll, nothing more. Are you a licensed certified psychiatric pro that has years of professional practice under his belt and a formal examination of myself given by yourself as an actual psychiatric pro in a professional psychiatric environs?? No, of course not. You're just more troll noise.

    2. Re:Hello, Prune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aspire rage is the funniest kind, you know. Thanks for the laughs.

    3. Re:Hello, Prune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you show signs of it and OCD by trying to get the last word, you off topic troll. I won't allow it. Too bad for you. Now go cry someplace else pusscake, lol!

    4. Re:Hello, Prune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O rly?

  69. Re:adv by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

    I am not a mother. Would that affect the chances of me getting paid, sir?

  70. Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is your anti-psychotic prescription talking to you.

    Eat me.

    Sincerely,
    Your Prescription.

  71. Is it true you're called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Biggest Mentalcase Online? LMAO! You called yourself "BMO" after all, and are clearly projecting your own issues with taking "meds". Try be on topic troll: You might actually have successes that way.

  72. BMO now posts as AC? Will wonders never cease! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh look: BMO (Biggest Mentalcase Online is posting ac now - "gosh what a surprise" (NOT)). As was predicted here http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40803909 BMO not taking his meds (which he attempts to project onto others only giving himself away as yet another nutball, lol) has him posting yet again. It's his OCD rage, lol!

  73. You were right about "BMO" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Mentalcase Online posted again http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40804167 just as you predicted he would. I suppose that unlike most crazos, BMO is entirely predictable due to his condition (OCD).

    1. Re:You were right about "BMO" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahaha (classic). BMO's living proof of this article http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26044935/ns/health-mental_health/t/shock-therapy-makes-quiet-comeback/ but Biggest Mentalcase Online isn't quiet about it at all! Heck, I've heard to save money on sessions, "BMO" sticks his nose into a 220 line at home to do it himself (lmao). It's not working out TOO WELL as you all can see, but he's trying!

  74. Your shock therapist called "BMO" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Mentalcase Online missed shock therapy again. BMO's past meds being effective for his "delicate condition" people! Hence his "BMO" handle/nickname here (lmao).

  75. BMO missed shock therapy again (lmao) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest Mentalcase Online quit missing your shock therapy sessions already (lol).

  76. Wrong Metaphor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FB should be encouraging investors to invest.

    Sad truth that FB is just a Ponzi Scheme and King Zuck is at the Helm of the H.M.S. FB as the iceberg chips away at the bulkheads.

    An article on MarketWatch lamented that ... well .... perhaps ... FB is worth about $17 a share.

    I'd say from what I've seen is that each employee of FB contributes $0.01 to the share price, i.e. their lives value is the sum total of $0.01.

    That would put the 'value' of FB stock at about $13 a share.

    That might be in this case much more than generous. Since the value of an employee should be judged by what the employee contributes.

    Given the 'Performance', i.e. 'sponging off his parents' of King Zuck, I would put his worth, i.e. value of his life at $0.00000000000001.

    Hard to 'make up' that in summer school hay King Zuck.

    Oh well.

    Worse could happen.

    King Zuck might just apply ... and heaven forbid ... get a real job that his intelligence is evolved for front and square! Delivering pizzas for Dominos!

    Yuck Yuck Yuck for the Zuck Zuck Zuck.

    Piss

    LoL

  77. You have my sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this world who find these things more difficult. If I had known, that this was your case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn't have been "right". Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you.

  78. BMO, Biggest Mentalcase Online "LIVE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Absolutely LIVE" (as in live-wire) http://www.flickr.com/photos/mr_carl/3426106666/ (LMAO!).

    BMO's long past meds nowadays and into shock therapy which isn't helping him much! He first tried saving money by sticking a 220 line to his nose but as you can see, it didn't work out too well, lol and hence, his nickname\handle of Biggest Mentalcase Online!

  79. APK, your psychiatrist called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He says your appointment is moved up to 8am Monday. He would like to speak to you about your abuse of bold type.

    Oh, and, he sent me a pic. I didn't know that doctor-patient relationships were ok. He says you took the photo.

    http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y246/electricpetertork/bears4.jpg

    1. Re:APK, your psychiatrist called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK hasn't posted. Are you hearing voices again?

    2. Re:APK, your psychiatrist called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding APK he's obviously seeing things too not just hearing them, lol. I personally haven't seen APK post yet so this phone call he is ranting about while foaming at the mouth (lmao) also indicates he's hearing things now also. Time for his electroshock therapy again lol! It happens. He missed his appointments and THIS is what we get.

  80. BMO quit doing your shock therapy @ home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't respect the fact you *tried* to save some ca$h or insurance claims by taping a 220 line live wire to your nose to do your own "homegrown" style of electroshock therapy (since we know you're way past meds being effective): See below, they caught you LIVE ("Absolutely LIVE", lol).

    By the way: Love your photo here http://www.flickr.com/photos/mr_carl/3426106666/ LMAO!

    Makes sense now WHY you're called Biggest Mentalcase Online, since you certainly live up to the name!

  81. BMO, you hearing voices again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BMO, "Absolutely LIVE" (as in live-wire) http://www.flickr.com/photos/mr_carl/3426106666/ (LMAO!). You're also "hearing voices" again it seems per your statements, and delusional that I am "APK". Sorry, wrong door. I suppose that's not your fault, entirely, but this was news I heard here today: BMO's long past meds nowadays and into shock therapy which isn't helping him much! I understand that BMO first tried saving money by sticking a 220 line to his nose but as you can see, it didn't work out too well, lol and hence, his nickname\handle of Biggest Mentalcase Online!

  82. Speaking of "challenging" BMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must've been challenging putting a 220 live line up your nose BMO doing your own version of "homegrown" electroshock therapy, lol! At least you *tried* to go as close to your puny brain as possible and perhaps to save some cash or insurance claims, but as we all can see, it's not working out any better for you than meds did (lmao). At least you live up to your own name of Biggest Mentalcase Online, I'll give you that, lol!

    1. Re:Speaking of "challenging" BMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, absolutely classic, with "absolutely LIVE" BMO (we don't call him Biggest Mentalcase Online for nothing! Well, he calls himself that, so he's just being honest, lol!). BMO, you aren't very photogenic here in this portrait of you either http://www.flickr.com/photos/mr_carl/3426106666/ Yea, "live" alright. As in "live wire". How's your nose doing BMO? Putting a hot 220 electric line up into it must have hurt, lol! People, BMO is a clearcut case why trying "homegrown" electroshock therapy is a no-no, lmao! I bet you miss the days when 110 was the standard for homes, right? Hahaha.

    2. Re:Speaking of "challenging" BMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! That's hilarious. Does BMO really do that? Doesn't BMO, the Biggest Mentalcase Online know there's an "energy crisis" going on and "staying 'GREEN'" is the way to go? He ought to reconsider stepping back down to 110 I say, just to be patriotic and a good citizen as well as saving on his power bill and blowing fuses, lol!

  83. Facebook IS the attack by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    I think it's ironic that a company whose CEO has repeatedly made it clear from the start that user's data should not be kept private is claiming to improve security while they themselves have intentionally and willfully made users' private data public again and again by changing default settings and making it hard to change them back. Or has everyone already forgotten? I for one assume everything I post on Facebook is going to become completely public, including private messges. Have you ever read the permissions you grant on any application you use (I don't use FB apps because of this)?

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
    1. Re:Facebook IS the attack by elflord · · Score: 1

      This is right on the money. FB's security model is poorly thought out, and the indifference of the CEO to privacy concerns probably has a lot to do with it. In generally, the ad-hoc revisions of their privacy settings (which have at times forced users to opt out of more permissive settings) are indicative of a poorly thought out security model. The kind of "attack" that is effective (and has been used against FB users) is the "viral app" -- basically, the typical facebook "app" requires that the app is able to perform actions on behalf of the user and see the users data, so most users don't think twice about checking these boxes.

  84. APK in da house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad to see APK back.

    There is only one APK, even though APK has more than one voice living in his head.

  85. Where has APK posted? I haven't seen it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop missing your electroshock therapy and taking your meds! So far, You've shown us that not only do you hear voices on the phone that aren't there, but that you're seeing things now also. See subject, and first line of this reply above

    (And I don't mean the 220 "hot" line you stick up your nose to try do "homegrown" electroshock therapy on yourself either!)

    Did you do that to *try* save ca$h or insurance claims? It had to have hurt, and the results are not good for you either, as you're hearing voices and seeing things nowadays too, lol!

  86. APK and intimate knowledge... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem obsessed with shocking one's self with 220 as opposed to 115. Do you do this? How does it feel? Enjoyable? I would like to hear your thoughts on this, however they may be.

    Your faithful servant,
    The other voice in your head.

  87. BMO does it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask BMO (Biggest Mentalcase Online). Sure, BMO probably started out his "homegrown" electroshock therapy on 110, but needed a better "kick" (lol) so he stepped it on up, and we see the results (too bad we're stuck with him around here though) and when housing standards went up to 220? Well, being the in style guy he is, he just HAD to try it (lol).

    As far as hearing anyone's thoughts as you stated, tell us why you hear those voices (that aren't there anymore than APK posting here as you seem to have illusions on that account also)? Perhaps you ought to consult with "certified self-administered home electro-shock therapist" (lol), BMO? He's "certified" alright (certifiably nuts).

  88. I am BMO's neighbor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's got the entire neighborhood pissed since he shorts out local powergrids sometimes during his "homegrown" electroshock sessions, and can't seem to stop. The local power company's tried to prosecute him even to no avail. He keeps getting off on insanity pleas! I saw him cutting into the "hot" wires in the local transformer once (he must have been really in need of a "dose", or locked himself out of his house or basement where the fusebox is)! Afterwards, man" BMO looked just like Bill the Cat http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s34/GHERU/fun/BilltheCat.gif when he stuck that wire up his nose I tell you. I called the cops after the entire area blacked out but the bastard snuck into a Mickie D's bathroom and combed his hair really well and wormed out of it again. BMO really needs help. I respect he's trying to help himself, but that is NOT the way to do it, lol!

  89. Bill the Cat n' BMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha. Question: What do BMO n Bill the Cat have in common after his "homegrown" self-administered electroshock sessions? Answer = Looks http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s34/GHERU/fun/BilltheCat.gif LMAO!

  90. Re:Options for "DNSBL filtered 'secured'" DNS serv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lego blocks are too advanced for you.

  91. Thanks, but it's trivially simple to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once I challenge the trolls to disprove every point here -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40801683 which they've tried & failed on MANY times here on /. alone over the years? They always run (or fail miserably, not even being able to disprove a single one of them, & there's roughly 21 of them).

    (Every single time, without fail too... it's very amusing, but, a bit like picking on a retard!)

    * That's really what I like to see though, them running away after trolling me by ac posts... happens a lot!

    APK

    P.S.=> It's not my fault either that they're trolling simpletons, but someone's got to do it, so... might as well be them (they just end up making me look good, which in the end? I thank them for!)...

    ... apk

  92. Found one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Zuckerbug. Show me the money please.

  93. bmo you're a transparent asshole troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You trolled him here http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40803011 and here http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40803561 and here http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40803811 and doubtless others by anonymous coward reply options you have and now you're trying to play victim and saint? Grow up, asshole.

    1. Re:bmo you're a transparent asshole troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Grow up, asshole

      Who are you talking to? All I see are anonymous posts. BMO only posted a few times and left. You are here raging at anonymous posts.

      Seek help.

  94. Aw, poor little troll's trying to get pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read bmo's garbage and put him in his place here http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3011387&cid=40810879 and now you're all sore that the person you cry like a little girl about a person (allegedly apk) that got the best of you with facts of your being off topic the entire time, then for trolling them, and then he used your own methods against you and you cry about it? Haha, what a little beyotch you are. Grow up little girl. Trying to play victim or saint when you're off topic and just wrong is so transparent it is not funny. No, you will not get the last word out of your troll mouth. I won't allow it. Scumbag trolls like you go off topic and then harass others, and now you're accusing ac posters here of being apk too? Plenty of ac posts were against those you accuse of being apk. Take a look. I did. You're doubtless one of them you mindless little trolling piece of online trash. If you were on topic just once here I might have given you some sympathy, but you were not, not once. Fuck off loser.

  95. Hahaha, knew that'd get your OCD rage goin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n' you'd have to reply, lol! So predictable, just like most trolling monkeys like yourself usually are.

    1. Re:Hahaha, knew that'd get your OCD rage goin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't very parsimonious with your words.

    2. Re:Hahaha, knew that'd get your OCD rage goin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You proved yourself a stalking anonymous douche with OCD issues.

    3. Re:Hahaha, knew that'd get your OCD rage goin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot, allow me to introduce you to kettle...

  96. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you on topic? No. Go away troll.

  97. Google deliberately crowd sources testing by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    Along with some interesting revelations, the interview of James Whittaker about his book, How Google Tests Software, included some discussion about effective crowd sourcing of software. Part of his argument is that even the best test engineers are going to miss things that end users find easily, so one way to leverage this is to make it as easy as possible for end users to provide high quality bug reports. He also has a lot of interesting things to say about scaling the testing process.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  98. You can't read can you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He proved bmo started trolling him n doubtless is doing ac posts along with other moron trolls around here.

    1. Re:You can't read can you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, what? What are you going on about? Obviously you are mistaken

  99. Get out your hooked on phonics douche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  100. Re:Have you ever considered being on topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooh, someone got mod points and decided to go back to a comment from more than a week ago and settle a score.

    Sorry about your penis :(