Slashdot Mirror


A Conversation with Rob Malda - Part One of Three (Video)

Slashdot's Glorious 15th Anniversary (link to bad fireworks video) is coming up in October, so Jeff 'Soulskill' Boehm and Rob 'samzenpus' Rozeboom decided to have a chat with Rob Malda. Back in 1997 Rob founded a website named Chips & Dips that later morphed into something called Slashdot, which has been (as the saying goes) "often imitated but never duplicated." Since leaving Slashdot, Rob has been doing this, that, and the other, but we'll let him tell you what he's doing in his own words. Note: This is an audio interview with some semi-interesting photos laid over it as a slide show, so you might want to listen to it rather than watch it. Parts Two and Three of the interview will be along in the next few days.

72 comments

  1. Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) by drinkydoh · · Score: 1

    Why you proposed your wife via Slashdot?

    Read all about how governments use brain pattern matching abusively.

    1. Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      Why you proposed your wife via Slashdot?

      Read all about how governments use brain pattern matching abusively.

      Just ask the government.

      --
      Donate free food here
    2. Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because it was Valentine's Day, he wanted to do something both geeky and romantic, he knew Kathleen would see it, and she said "yes".

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

    4. Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) by Meski · · Score: 1

      Just as well she didn't have mod points.

  2. Chips and Dips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good to see Soulkill and Samzpenis still keeping the Dips part alive.

  3. Sorry, Did Not Listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why post an audio interview without a transcript? Way to know your audience.

    1. Re:Sorry, Did Not Listen by avandesande · · Score: 1

      RTFA == WTFV

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Sorry, Did Not Listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They know nobody will RTFA, so probably they know their audience very well.

    3. Re:Sorry, Did Not Listen by noh8rz6 · · Score: 0

      tl;dr. I can't stand real-time information flow - too slow, I get impatient.

      --
      Don't be a h8r.
    4. Re:Sorry, Did Not Listen by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      Plus, I'm pretty sure a transcript would result in a TL;DR, so I'm concurring.

  4. I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who really cares? And there seems to be a lot of retrospectives about him and Slashdot lately.

  5. can't watch vid (Linux Mint) by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Running Linux Mint 13 (Mate ed.) and it plays neither on firefox or midori. Is there another source to watch this? wget -O taco http://player.ooyala.com/static/cacheable/444fd7076af0334709af3684f7f0e127/player_v2.swf -- (fail). Any suggestions?

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    1. Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Here we talk all day long about open formats but even Slashdot shows that at the end of the day Flash is the bees knees.

    2. Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Might just be an awkwardly configured system on my part, but youtube and even vimeo work well enough. I'd never heard of ooyala before posting the parent.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    3. Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? What? That's nonsense. It's not a configuration issue. Haven't you heard? Linux is the most advanced OS and it works out of the box everytime. Don't question it, it's teh Linux!!!!onehundredeleven!!! You must be a big Windoze l0z3r....

    4. Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually use 'this poop'. Different distro - and it's totally the shit.

  6. No One Give a Shit by sexconker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No one gives a shit
    Slashdot is the pits
    Why are you such a tool?

    Fuck your ugly face
    You fucking sold this place
    And now you
    think you're cool?

    One last question now
    Can you tell me how
    To profit
    off of fools?

    Is it astrotruf?
    Paid-off trolls and smurfs?
    UI that
    ignores the rules?

    I've got hate and spite
    For this shitty site
    Slashdot sucks
    AC RULES!

    1. Re:No One Give a Shit by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      "That's why Slytherins all sing, Malda is our king"

  7. Who? by jfengel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, it's all so 2011.

    1. Re:Who? by jokkebk · · Score: 2

      I have to say I'm not certain why all these "Rob Malda gets a job" and "Rob Malda discusses Reddit" articles that have appeared since he resigned from Slashdot are relevant news for nerds. I've been following the site since the nineties, and with the exception of few posts (like the proposal mentioned earlier), the editors were never a focus in the posts, but the news instead.

      I would assume the people who wanted to follow CmdrTaco more carefully could, like, follow his personal website or something. At least to me, the Slashdot culture has never centered around any figureheads, but the community and commenters (and of course Rob Malda was an integral part of both for a long time).

      At least this three-part interview series could've been timed to occur more closely with the 15 year anniversary, now it just feels like free PR push.

      --
      http://codeandlife.com
  8. Transcript, please. by heptapod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Enough with the video.

    1. Re:Transcript, please. by avandesande · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, like you were going to RTFA anyway ;-)

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  9. Will there be meetups like we did for 10? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Just checking.

    Had a blast at the last one.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? by clovis · · Score: 1

      And should it be limited to people with slashdot ID's of 4 digits or fewer?

    2. Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? by Fnord666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And should it be limited to people with slashdot ID's of 4 digits or fewer?

      Yes it should. Just be sure to schedule it in time for the early bird specials and wrap it up before 8pm so everyone can get to bed on time.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    4. Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Thanks for that one /sarcasm ...from now until the end of time, Google is going to be aware I searched the android market place for 'grindr' and think I'm a queermo.

      So, which of the following are the reasons that this worries you?

      • You're in the closet and don't want to be accidentally outed by Google.
      • You're violently homophobic and frightened of anyone thinking you might be gay.
      • You are worried by the thought that Google's database about you may contain errors making it less valuable when they sell the use of your personal information to advertisers.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? by sandman71 · · Score: 1

      Way to discriminate against people with 5 digits. sheesh! :P

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away!
    6. Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? by Chas · · Score: 1

      Well SOMEONE needs to call you people out on your conspicuous consumption of extra digits!

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    7. Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? by Anthony · · Score: 2

      Naturally yes. I like the early-bed time, but the sun never sets on Slashdot.

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  10. I know we should not RTFA..... by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    But I guess we slashdotted google+ anyways
    Chips and dips AKA https://plus.google.com/photos/105030465637303791249/albums/5645165571128591969 brings up a blank page

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  11. What does it mean 'what would it become'? by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    I mean what do you think /. is? Maybe it's something that I don't understand at all, it's a forum, it's an advertising platform, it has themes that are supposedly geared towards technology (but also plenty of flaming... well, that's an advertising technique).

    But I don't get it probably, what does Malda mean by 'what it will become'? What could it become, except diluted over time? It's like a newsgroup, maybe it's IRC with memory, but what is he talking about?

    1. Re:What does it mean 'what would it become'? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      He got a class on "Business Speak" somewhere. When you leave a major undertaking, presuming it's not a sinking ship, you speak of it in multi-tenses.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    2. Re:What does it mean 'what would it become'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean what do you think /. is

      well, based on your posts, it is apparently a recruitment board for your cult. a long time ago it used to be a place to talk about technology but then it got run over by the likes of yourself and other like-minded adherents to your religion.

  12. Slashdot's decline and irrelivancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They should ask him what he thinks of Slashdot's decline due to an increasing moronic userbase. This site used to be about open source advocacy, yet now half the people on here are using closed source Apple products. Will Slashdot even be around in a year or two?

    1. Re:Slashdot's decline and irrelivancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should ask him what he thinks of Slashdot's decline due to an increasing moronic userbase. This site used to be about open source advocacy, yet now half the people on here are using closed source Apple products. Will Slashdot even be around in a year or two?

      What? Why with innovations like SlashBI, SlashCloud, and SlashDatacenter I'm sure Slashdot will be around for many years to come!

      But seriously, does anyone read those 'channels'? Each one has one or two guys writing a dozen or so fluff pieces a day, and I'm not seeing much in the way of comments the one or two times I've bothered to check them. and they reek of corporate meddling.

    2. Re:Slashdot's decline and irrelivancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the telemarketers can't spell either!

      FTFY

  13. I miss '97 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gosh remember '97? Back then a post this would have likely read: "this, that, and the other." instead of the grammatically incorrect and awkward "this and that and the other,"

  14. Compressed SWF format not supported by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    It plays here OK on Firefox/Chrome under Ubuntu 12.04. When I try and play in in xine/vlc/mplayer I get "Compressed SWF format not supported".

    --
    AccountKiller
  15. 25 comments @ 2:59 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Just wow.

    In the olden days this would have been a a 1200 post troll-fest.
    Now the trolls don't even care Taco.

    1. Re:25 comments @ 2:59 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight, you gerbil.

      Hugs and kisses,

      Juan Epstein

  16. Re:Do you support the constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or are you going to vote for Obama?

    Do you support the constitution or are you going to vote for either party?

  17. Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Program much?

    The == operator is used for logical evaluation and is not used for assignment or declaration. So, by saying RTFA == WTFV , you're basically asking us to evaluate whether RTFA is equal to WTFV. I'll return zero for that.
     
    This is one of my pet peeves around here. The thoughtless use of the == operator and the annoying @$())(JASDNO CARRIER fad.

    1. Re:Mod parent down! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Get out much?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. As a matter of fact, I have just returned from an evening at the clubs. After the clubs, I spent a half-hour with a woman whom I picked up, and I have now returned to my flat to check email and relax.

      Now for dessert, please munch on my nuts.

    3. Re:Mod parent down! by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      No, the use of == is correct here. He's certainly not assigning the value of WTFV to RTFA. He's stating the equivalence of RTFA and WTFV. Since the article is in video form, the only way to read the article is to watch the video. If you've watched the video, you've read the article. If you haven't watched, you haven't read. They can both be true, or they can both be false. Either way, (RTFA == WTFV) evaluates to true.

      It would be better to write RTFA â WTFV, of course, but slashdot doesn't believe in unicode and mangles the three-bar STRICTLY EQUIVALENT TO glyph I put between RTFA and WTFV.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    4. Re:Mod parent down! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Wet?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    5. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, dude, that was the joke where you're supposed to pick up on - the fact that they should evaluate the same. Learn 2 humor dude.

  18. Low comment count explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Three hours after this is posted and there's still less than 40 comments, half of them are trolls or off topic. Kinda makes you think that no one really cares about Taco... and that Slashdot is falling apart due to techno-political ramblings that only get comments from fanatics so they can pound their chests.
     
    But, hey, it's all about page hits anyway anymore. I guess Slashdot found it's bread and butter.

  19. Someone needs to learn how to use compression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This audio is RAW - any chance for parts 2 and 3 we can get some compression? I'd be more than happy to help!

  20. Ah, 1997. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 0

    I think I joined in late 1997 or early 1998.

    Four digit user ID club. :)

    1. Re:Ah, 1997. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i could have had 4 digit user id if i hadn't already decided to never sign up to another site that demanded a signup.
      the last straw was when microsoft bought hotmail. and it's all been downhill from there.

      and i've been proudly lurking all this time.

    2. Re:Ah, 1997. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

      Whoa, quite the early adopter of that particular oath! :)

  21. My review of Rob Malda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No intelligence. Less pizazz than a common boor. Lame.

  22. IDIOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The GP already made it CLEAR that the == operator is not a statement of equivalence. Go back to grammar school, you dolt.

    1. Re:IDIOT. by dotbot · · Score: 1

      The GP already made it CLEAR that the == operator is not a statement of equivalence.

      The particular choice of operator for equality in a predicate cannot influence whether the predicate is being logically asserted, i.e. holds for all valuations, or is just a free-standing formula. To make it clear that it was an assertion, it should have been written with a turnstile in front:

      |- RTFA == WTFV

    2. Re:IDIOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You slashdotters are stupid. ITT Tech first-years, all of you. Double equal signs are NEVER used free-standing.

  23. Dumb and dumber by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Malda left after destroying what used to be a good website. Now, we let the resident king of editorial failure go and interview him. What, exactly, do we expect to be learned from this? Or is samzenpus just trying to get interview tips from Rob so he has a chance at a job after this site finally dies?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Dumb and dumber by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      And yet... here you are.

  24. Re:Do you support the constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attention leftist free software hippies!

    You live in a dream world, I'm afraid, and 20 cents is just the beginning. You don't think Papa John's is going to buy them health insurance do you? He's going to pay the much cheaper Fine/Tax. And his employee's still won't benefit one single iota.

    In fact, Obama's 6000 new IRS agents will find these employees and take away their income tax refundable credits because they still won't be able to afford the insurance that is now MANDATORY. If they couldn't afford it before, they won't just suddenly find the money to buy your beloved Obama's individual policies.

    Please try thinking now and then beyond your love for Obama.

    Have you ever noticed the average age of a chain pizza store employee? 18, 23 maybe? These are the young people that Obama is now going to penalize - TAX - for not buying the MANDATORY Obamacare package. They are young and healthy and the only reason Obama and the Spread the Wealth crowd demand their participation is that they will now be paying for insurance that they didn't need before and will not use now.

    It is this very group you see in your "dreams of my father" fantasy world that Obama is going to take money from that they didn't have to pay before. AND THEY STILL WON'T HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE. They'll just have to pay their own fine at tax time.

    For goodness sake, take a step ouside the box!

    You should stop checking your brain at the alter of the first "not completely White" President. Obama is a disaster.

  25. Re:Do you support the constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama is doing fine, disaster presidents were Nixon and George Bush (both of them). Haters gonna hate no matter who's in charge, but I'm sure you could do better job. Just run for president come next round. It's a democracy, after all.

  26. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With sites like Digg (up til a couple years ago) and Reddit (nowadays), Slashdot has become something rather, behind-the-times. Most news stories on Slashdot tend to be days behind what's already on Reddit.

  27. Re:Do you support the constitution by denvergeek · · Score: 1

    Although Nixon gave us the EPA and the Clean Water Act...

  28. The tyrant will by FrontDoors · · Score: 1

    The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny. - The right words, yeah!