Slashdot Mirror


CIA: Flying Skyhook Wasn't Just For James Bond, It Actually Rescued Agents

coondoggie writes "This had to be one hell of a ride. The CIA today said it added a pretty cool item to its museum archives — the instruction card for officers being plucked off the ground by a contraption that would allow a person to be snatched off the ground by a flying aircraft without the plane actually landing."

123 comments

  1. It's in the Archive so now they use... by NinjaTekNeeks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Teleporter's most likely. Always wondered what you could come up with with an unlimited budget, now we know.

    1. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by jdray · · Score: 4, Informative

      IIRC, the skyhook was featured in "The Green Berets" (1968). I've definitely seen it in some Vietnam War flick. At any rate, when I was in the USAF, as a loadmaster on C-130s, I remember reading about a procedure and rig for the extraction. Definitely a corner case, though, like JATO bottles.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    2. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, if you don't know how to use an apostrophe, your views can't be very educated.

      Your "opinion" doesn't impress me much.
      The apostrophe is an almost useless archaism. I would guess its most important use nowadays is as a shibboleth.
      The OP was making a point (as well as a joke) about what's kept secret versus what is revealed.
      Your post contributed nothing (ditto mine).

    3. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Teleporter's most likely.

      Or, y'know, a helicopter.

    4. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Picass0 · · Score: 2

      Ironic. You're jumping on someone about grammar and you start a sentence with "Jees".

    5. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Sez+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny
      Here's the CIA link I thought this was funny, regarding the development of the system:

      The first live test, with a sheep, failed when the harness twisted and strangled the animal. On subsequent tests other sheep fared better.

      Yes, hard to believe a subsequent test where sheep fared worse, but I'm sure slashdot will oblige.

    6. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeh, but a c-130 is still something like 2x faster and 10x range

    7. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by NinjaTekNeeks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if there was an edit function I could correct the mistakes I made, since I don't have that ability, you will just need to suffer the inconvenience it has caused you and move on with your day.

    8. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by KrackerJax · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also from the CIA article:

      "Fulton first used instrumented dummies as he prepared for a live pickup. He next used a pig, as pigs have nervous systems close to humans. Lifted off the ground, the pig began to spin as it flew through the air at 125 mph. It arrived on board undamaged but in a disoriented state. Once it recovered, it attacked the crew."

      Too funny, I can only imagine what a berserker pig in an aircraft is like.

      --
      Sauer
    9. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Jeng · · Score: 4, Funny

      You might be a computer if you only can only process information that is properly formatted and improperly formatted information gives you a segfault.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    10. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      Helicopters can be refueled mid-flight and have a radar signature that's bit more... subtle.

    11. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and have a radar signature that's bit more... subtle.

      [[citation needed]]

      Those big whirly things on top, and especially that big old flat one on the back, aren't the most stealthy things on earth. A helicopter's advantage comes from being able to hug the nap of the earth and hide from radar, rather than deflect it away.

      True, we used "stealth" helicopters in the bin laden raid, but my guess would be that the concern there was the super secrete stuff was 75% noise reduction 25% radar signature.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    12. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Funny

      especially one inside the confines of an aircraft. I can only imagine how the ground crew and engineers were treated upon landing.

      (Bay door opens)

      Engineer: So how'd it.....(several angry loadmasters exit with torn flight suits and reeking of pig shit).....nevermind. So, uhhhh, pork chops for dinner tonight?

      Loadmaster: Pork chops for dinner tonight.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    13. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Those big whirly things on top, and especially that big old flat one on the back, aren't the most stealthy things on earth.

      The comparison was to a C-130.

    14. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how a person unwilling to *read* has anything to do with a person unwilling to *write* correctly. Perhaps you are aneural? Look it up, it's a word.

    15. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by robot256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it gave him an "itsyourfault".

    16. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sheep was hauled on board and raped?

    17. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TWAT?!??

    18. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Forgive me if I'm not the first to post this, but...
      "I'm tired of these motherf*****g pigs on this motherf*****g plane!

    19. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      RTFA This was not the (Scottish|Irish|Australian|Kiwi) air-force. So no.

      Although I propose a new meme. The logistics command way. Like the Scottish|Irish way except instead of a cliff you use the edge of a load ramp on a C-130 at altitude.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Genda · · Score: 1

      Oh! Now you went and done it... Now they're gonna go make "Pigs on a Plane" starring Samuel L. Jackson, and its all your fault. I hope you're happy with yourself.

    21. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      IIRC, the skyhook was featured in "The Green Berets" (1968).

      You are correct: extraction method

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    22. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, "stealth" in helicopters is a relative term. Not really silent and invisible to radar, but more like, not so fucking loud and obvious that you break a crown when one flies within a hundred yards.

    23. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Brings to mind Arthur C Clarke's short story Travel By Wire where the experimenters turned a rabbit into a pile of 1 cubic centimetre 3D pixels, and decided they had to up the resolution. The next test subject died of fright and the one after that lived because it had been blindfolded.

    24. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how a person unwilling to *read* has anything to do with a person unwilling to *write* correctly. Perhaps you are aneural? Look it up, it's a word.

      If you are unwilling to read (that is, actual books) it is fantastically unlikely that you will be able to write properly.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teleporter's most likely.

      Teleporter's what? I don't understand!

      OOHHHHH, sorry, I see, you have used a word that ended in 's' so of course it _absolutely_had_to_have_ an apostrophe.

      Why not use two next time? I hear redundancy is a good thing in engineering circles!

    26. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's where King got the inspiration for "The Jaunt"?

    27. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Not knowing how to use an apostrophe has nothing to do with grammar, it has to do with basic literacy.

    28. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      You might be a computer if you only can only process information that is properly formatted and improperly formatted information gives you a segfault.

      I was about to reply that this is the worst Jeff Foxworthy joke ever.

      Then I realized, no, it isn't.

    29. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Not knowing how to use an apostrophe has nothing to do with grammar, it has to do with basic literacy.

      Too true.

      Here's a memorable guide to proper apostrophe usage. Also, IMO all of these guides should literally be required reading for anyone wishing to post to teh interwebs (in English, that is).

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    30. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those big whirly things on top, and especially that big old flat one on the back, aren't the most stealthy things on earth.

      The comparison was to a C-130.

      Don't worry, you're still wrong. A helicopter at altitude is still a big, glaring IADS target. A C-130 at 100' AGL would be a lot more "stealthy".

    31. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      especially one inside the confines of an aircraft. I can only imagine how the ground crew and engineers were treated upon landing.

      (Bay door opens)

      Engineer: So how'd it.....(several angry loadmasters exit with torn flight suits and reeking of pig shit).....nevermind. So, uhhhh, pork chops for dinner tonight?

      Loadmaster: Pork chops for dinner tonight.

      Nah. Engineers are an important part of the crew (Flight Engineer). Here's the more likely version:

      (Bay door opens)

      Loadmaster: Pork chops for dinner tonight.

      Crew chief (seeing mess): Shit! I am NOT cleaning that up! HAZMAT!!!!

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    32. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      So much for realism :( need some edit buttons. I meant to replace "Bay door opens" with "ramp and door open" before I posted.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    33. Re:It's in the Archive so now they use... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      That is the most interesting error code I have ever read.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  2. The Unit... by bhlowe · · Score: 2

    They showed this extraction method on The Unit. Season 2, episode 1 "Change of Station".

    1. Re:The Unit... by j-pimp · · Score: 5, Informative

      They showed this extraction method on The Unit. Season 2, episode 1 "Change of Station".

      Also, Morgan Freeman used it to get Batman out of China without taking the bat boots off for the TSA.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:The Unit... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I also saw it in an older war movie, possibly "Bridge over the river Kwai".

      They used it to extract a high ranking POW, if memory serves.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:The Unit... by MrWin2kMan · · Score: 2

      'The Green Berets' starring John Wayne was the first time I saw it in film.

      --
      Nothing to see here but us trolls...move along...
    4. Re:The Unit... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He even described it accurately:

      Lucius Fox: Now for high altitude jumps you're gonna need oxygen and stabilizers. Now I must say compared to your usual requests, jumping out of an airplane is pretty straightforward.
      Bruce Wayne: And what about getting back into the plane?
      Lucius Fox: I'd recommend a good travel agent.
      Bruce Wayne: Without it landing.
      Lucius Fox: Now that's more like it, Mr. Wayne. The CIA had a program back in the 60's for getting their people out of hot spots called Sky Hook. We could look into that.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    5. Re:The Unit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was going to comment on that as well, was friggin awesome :-)

    6. Re:The Unit... by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Um, I don't think that could have been Bridge on the River Kwai. William Holden escapes into the jungle on foot at the beginning, and the movie ends before there's any extraction of what's left of the demolition team.

      Also, the movie came out in 1957 (winning Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Director, and 4 other Oscars that year), and TFA says the first use of the skyhook was 1962.

      Excellent fucking movie though.

    7. Re:The Unit... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Also in The American Way.

    8. Re:The Unit... by khallow · · Score: 1

      You might be referring to The Green Berets which had the abduction of a North Vietnam general as part of the plot.

  3. Is this a surprise? by Lester67 · · Score: 4, Informative

    They practiced this, pretty regularly at Hurlburt Field, Florida... within view of the general public. Several of the MC-130's were fitted with the catch arms. (It's even had a wikipedia page for awhile now.)

    So, yeah, it's cool... but it's hardly new or a secret.

    1. Re:Is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't notice anything until it's shoved in their face. How many people do you think knew who Joe Kittinger was before yesterday's stunt? Fairly few it seems.

    2. Re:Is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knew who he was.

      But didn't know that more than 10 years after he performed that feat, he spent 11 months in the Hanoi Hilton.

    3. Re:Is this a surprise? by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's still an MC-130E at the entrance of Hurlburt (at the museum, so findable using GIS) still outfitted with the sky hook last time I was down there. I believe the later CT1s have all had the functionality removed, but I'm a CT2 (MC-130H) guy. Sadly, the E model is being phased out and even the development team has been shifted to other duties.

    4. Re:Is this a surprise? by jdray · · Score: 2

      Sadly, the E model is being phased out...

      Sadly? Really? Those things were getting difficult to maintain when I was in (happily crewing H models) in the late eighties. My friends at Little Rock, who were stuck with E models, cussed them regularly.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    5. Re:Is this a surprise? by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, no doubt they're getting up there in years. It's time I suppose.

      It looks like they're going to be replaced by J-models, which I personally don't care for due to how the vendor has a lifetime contract for the main mission computer. That in itself isn't so bad, but we still have to have a full government team working concurrently to develop the plane-specific OFP. Nothing to do with the functionality, but it's pretty wasteful. Personal preference.

    6. Re:Is this a surprise? by G-Man · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep, the Fulton Recovery System - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_surface-to-air_recovery_system

      I get the impression it was similar to ejecting from an aircraft: Yes it worked, yes it was fairly safe, but you only did it if you really had to.

    7. Re:Is this a surprise? by Klinky · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a great quote from the wiki:

      "Fulton first used instrumented dummies as he prepared for a live pickup. He next used a pig, as pigs have nervous systems close to humans. Lifted off the ground, the pig began to spin as it flew through the air at 125 mph (200 km/h). It arrived on board uninjured but in a disoriented state. Once it recovered, it attacked the crew."

    8. Re:Is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know that this is a surprise. This is a neat, new item for the CIA museum.

      That said, the same kind of thing was developed by others. Nate Saint , (also) one of the 5 missionaries martyred in the Ecuadorean Amazon, developed a similar device for raising and lowering items. They picked up a parrot in a bucket from a Piper Cub, according to the books "Through Gates of Splendor", and "The End of the Spear".

      That said, this isn't the only neat new item that could go in the CIA museum. There could be all kinds of momentos from governments overthrown, Americans murdered at the behest of international companies(in Chile, for example), the US presidency seized (Reagan / Bush at least through Bush Jr), and wreckage accomplished. Thanks, if I want to go to see a museum, I'll take my kids to see Nate Saint in the stained glass window of the National Cathedral. He, at least, accomplished some good. If I want to go see neat new devices, I'll take a look at things developed by Steve Saint, his son.

  4. Aspect ratio by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Another stupid webmaster who never learned about aspect ratios. In fact, there's also stupid people in television stations, because the amount of broadcasts with the wrong aspect ratio is rather astounding.

    1. Re:Aspect ratio by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Another stupid webmaster who never learned about aspect ratios.

      Or thumbnails.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Aspect ratio by vlm · · Score: 2

      In fact, there's also stupid people in television stations, because the amount of broadcasts with the wrong aspect ratio is rather astounding.

      A little off topic, but I've seen SD PBS analog "basic" cable channels with black bars holding a HD aspect video, that HD aspect video is holding a SD video, inside that SD video is a HD signal. Yes, double blackbar'd. Impressive fail there.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Aspect ratio by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Yes, but was it stable or was it switching every few seconds? There's nothing quite like having aspect on "auto" and letting the station bother you dozens of times before you impose a compromise manually.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    4. Re:Aspect ratio by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      It isn't just the broadcasters. I was at Chili's and all the HDTVs were showing the game in SD. Broadcasters won't fix it if viewers can't even tell if it is wrong.

    5. Re:Aspect ratio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chill, Romney... this isn't the time or place.

  5. They extracted several agents from the USSR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But they had to wait until the end of the cold war to collect their legs.

    1. Re:They extracted several agents from the USSR by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      the catch was actually relatively gentle considering the plane would have been travelling at a couple hundred mph. Something to do with the lift of the balloon and friction on the rope...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  6. skyhook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The concept and implementation has been around for decades and used successfully. probably, although I'm not sure, came out of some of the stunts that the old pre-WWII aviators did to impress people (and make money) at their airshows.

  7. It was also use in The Green Berets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was also use in The Green Berets (1968) when they captured an NVA general.

  8. Cardboard Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take care of your cardboard box, and your cardboard box will take care of you.

    This system was described exactly written during a dialog sequence in Metal Gear Solid 3. Even used similar diagrams if I recall correctly.

  9. Meh. by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

    Pah!

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  10. Necessity is the mother of invention by Tommy+Bologna · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize this flying skyhook technology and its use were doubted by any serious person. Are these the same people who doubt the moon landings?

    1. Re:Necessity is the mother of invention by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why would I believe it existed just because I saw it in a movie? i can't say I gave it a lot of thought, but I generally don't go "Gosh, I saw it in a james Bond movie, it must exist in real lifte."

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Necessity is the mother of invention by Tommy+Bologna · · Score: 1

      I guess I do more than watch movies. I've also seen it described and photographed in a book. This hasn't been a secret and they've been using it for decades.

    3. Re:Necessity is the mother of invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, believe it or not, other people might not give a shit about stuff like this. And, believe it or not, there might be topics other people care about that you don't. Imagine that.

    4. Re:Necessity is the mother of invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I do more than watch movies

      And I guess you're a lying scumbag for implying that your parent poster doesn't.

    5. Re:Necessity is the mother of invention by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      Are these the same people who doubt the moon landings?

      Probably not. The supply of people who will fall for the conspiracy theory du jour seems endless.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    6. Re:Necessity is the mother of invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying James Bond doesn't exist?!

      First Father Christmas. Now this. I'm gutted...

    7. Re:Necessity is the mother of invention by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why would I believe it existed just because I saw it in a movie? i can't say I gave it a lot of thought, but I generally don't go "Gosh, I saw it in a james Bond movie, it must exist in real lifte."

      You know your trouble? You're just too cynical.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:Necessity is the mother of invention by Tommy+Bologna · · Score: 1

      So willful ignorance is now a defense? Good to know. One also ponders why "other people" would visit this topic on Slashdot if they did "not give a shit about stuff like this."

  11. simpler system used 50+ years ago by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Interesting

    prop plane flying in special circles could keep a weight at end of winchable cable relatively stationary to ground. this method was used to take and deliver mail at remote locations, and at stunt shows to pick up and leave a stuntman.

    1. Re:simpler system used 50+ years ago by dickens · · Score: 1

      Cool idea - Just like an AC-130 but with a cable instead of a chain of hot lead (or depleted uranium)

    2. Re:simpler system used 50+ years ago by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      video of the "bucket drop"

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRZAwERwHVA

    3. Re:simpler system used 50+ years ago by EricTheGreen · · Score: 1

      No doubt simpler....but whatever the CIA is trying to airlift out in those circumstances probably needs to get itself gone in a hurry....and not require the plane flying around several times to be shot at by whatever angry folks are in pursuit....

    4. Re:simpler system used 50+ years ago by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Simpler maybe - but also much less flexible and much more dangerous for the aircraft in the type of mission that TFA describes. Simpler is not always better.

    5. Re:simpler system used 50+ years ago by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could also lower a (wired) telephone for the person on the ground to discuss things with the aircraft crew, like what stuff needed to be delivered. Phone comes down, ground guy takes/makes call. Phone goes up. Cable with box comes down. Ground guy disconnects the snap. Cable goes back up. Rinse and repeat if you need more than one box.

      Fly the aircraft high enough and it looks like a phone, or a box of stuff, is just being lowered by a cable out of the sky with no obvious source. And the craft has to be reasonably high for the cable to be stable, rather than circling, when it's near ground level.

      I understand this was used by missionaries in remote locations. I wonder how careful they were to let the congregation know that they were talking to / getting stuff from other missionaries, rather than heaven. B -)

      I hear you can also use it to raise (or lower) a guy in a harness.

      The main disadvantage compared to skyhook is that the aircraft has to circle the landing zone for a half-hour or so - at radar-visible height. It's there long enough to shoot down, and puts a big target on whom/whatever you were interacting with on the ground. NOT what you want for a black op behind enemy lines. Skyhook just flies an airplane over the target, with nothing to distinguish that spot from anywhere else on the flight path.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    6. Re:simpler system used 50+ years ago by Everything+Else+Was · · Score: 1

      Skyhook just flies an airplane over the target, with nothing to distinguish that spot from anywhere else on the flight path.

      Except the frickin' balloon with lights on the cable! ;-)

      The enemy just has to follow the balloon to get to the guy. Then the plane crew will be winching up a dead guy.

      --
      My other account has mod points!
  12. See this in a museum by steveha · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can see a display about this in the Evergreen Avation Museum in McMinnville, Oregon. They have an airplane on display with the "catcher" appratus mounted on the nose, and I think they have the other hardware too. (It's been a few years since I went there, and I mostly remember my tour of the Spruce Goose.)

    http://www.evergreenmuseum.org/

    They had some other intriguing stuff. I remember a short-range VTOL device that was basically an airplane engine mounted vertically; it sucked air in from the top, blew it out the bottom, and the operator would stand on a ring that circled the outside of the engine. I remember wondering how difficult that might be to fly, since it was too old to have a computer-controlled active stabilisation system. Also, I think I would want to wear hearing and eye protection if I was riding that thing.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:See this in a museum by steveha · · Score: 1

      Actually, now that I think about it, on that VTOL thing you stood on a platform directly over the engine. I guess the platform must have been offset high enough to allow sufficient air intake into the engine?

      I'll just have to go back to the Evergreen Aviation Museum and look again, one of these days.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  13. aka Fulton Recovery System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  14. Corona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US used a so-called Sky Hook to capture de-orbited film before it hit the water from the Corona spy satellite program.

  15. WWII glider yank-recovery by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2

    In WWII we were recovering entire gliders this way, not just people: http://www.silentwingsmuseum.com/pdf/RetrievalSystem.pdf -- a history of airplane/ground retrieval systems specifically relating to the effort to pull Waco CG4A gliders big enough to hold 15 people, from the fields where they'd landed back into the air and tow them back to the launch airbase without the tow plane landing. It was dangerous work and pretty often it ended up just tearing the glider into pieces but it was successful a fair amount of the time.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:WWII glider yank-recovery by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Brings to mind hang glider launches over water where the tow boat would accelerate to full speed as the rope fed out. The glider pilot got to watch the loop of rope in front of him getting smaller and smaller.

    2. Re:WWII glider yank-recovery by ImWithBrilliant · · Score: 1

      Do you have any records of gliders damaged by snatch pickup? An overused towline would, on rare occasion, snap while the glider was still on the ground, and go through the plexiglass windscreen, making the pilot duck. Only in the Dec '48 Greenland rescue did this happen to an airborne glider for an exciting return into the snow. http://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/Stranded.html

      --

      Is it a rule, that there's an exception to every rule?

    3. Re:WWII glider yank-recovery by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I don't have any written records. I talked to a guy who was a glider pilot and he had lots of stories about how well they could have worked and how poorly they did work because of lousy surveying of landing ground. He'd seen ones get yanked into pieces in snatch pickups and was of the opinion that the reason it was rarely used was twofold: risk, and higher-ups were deliberately sabotaging the delivery of snatch-recovery equipment (poles and lines) because they thought the risk outweighed the benefit.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    4. Re:WWII glider yank-recovery by ImWithBrilliant · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for any number of reasons much of the pickup gear delivered to England was removed, pre-Normandy, and few tow pilots trained. It wasn't until post-Market Garden that the European theater got serious about glider recovery, probably because they were needed for the last big operation to cross the Rhine. Burma used snatch pickup a lot, Pacific and Arctic a little; Med was offered to recover out of Siciliy but declined. I would love to talk or write to your glider pilot for the when, where, and how many he witnessed. My research has stagnated. PM to lg_glidr on the army air forces forum, http://forum.armyairforces.com/tt.aspx?forumid=162

      --

      Is it a rule, that there's an exception to every rule?

  16. This reminds me of something else by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    I heard (or I think I heard) about some system where you could play out a rope from a plane and, if the rope was long enough, the plane could circle and somehow the end of the rope would be held over a certain spot on the ground. Apparently (again, if I recall correctly) it could be used to gently lower equipment to the ground, where the receiver could just reach up and unhook the shipment from the rope while the plane was circling overhead. Has anyone ever heard of anything like that?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:This reminds me of something else by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      I heard (or I think I heard) about some system where you could play out a rope from a plane and, if the rope was long enough, the plane could circle and somehow the end of the rope would be held over a certain spot on the ground. Apparently (again, if I recall correctly) it could be used to gently lower equipment to the ground, where the receiver could just reach up and unhook the shipment from the rope while the plane was circling overhead. Has anyone ever heard of anything like that?

      I remember what you describe on TV when I was younger for both picking up and dropping off equipment. I'm pretty sure they even picked up a stunt man using this technique to demonstrate how gentle it was..

  17. Re:poo poo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pee pee

  18. railroads had this for decades by swschrad · · Score: 2

    the mail wagon got its mail from small cities by having a snatch hook grab it from a hanging hook at the edge of the platform, and the snatch hook was then pulled back into the mail car. so the CIA technology is derivative.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  19. Holy Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In The Dark Knight, Batman used it to kidnap a guy in Hong Kong!

  20. Fulton_surface-to-air recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as featured in the Green Berets
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_surface-to-air_recovery_system

  21. Julian Assange by Marksolo · · Score: 2

    This was my bet on the most effective way to get him out of London. Too bad Ecuador doesn't have the equipment.

    1. Re:Julian Assange by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      But the RAF.

    2. Re:Julian Assange by Xest · · Score: 1

      Their budgets have been cut so hard they probably can't afford the jet fuel anymore, I wouldn't worry about that :)

  22. The British used it in WWII by Dr+La · · Score: 1

    The British experimented and used this method already during WWII, to retrieve spies from occupied Europe.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
  23. It was in a John Wayne film by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember that this contraption was used in the John Wayne film "The Green Berets", and since it was way before special effects, I suspect it was really a person being snatched off the ground.

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    1. Re:It was in a John Wayne film by icebraining · · Score: 1

      No movie after Metropolis (1927) can be said to be before special effects.

    2. Re:It was in a John Wayne film by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Actually, Georges MéliÃs accidentally discovered the stop trick in 1896 and used it to create magic tricks in his films. Later, he also invented a number of other classic special effects techniques, decades before Metropolis was made. The film history shown in the movie Hugo was quite accurate, as was its depiction in his later life as a toy salesman.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:It was in a John Wayne film by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that this contraption was used in the John Wayne film "The Green Berets", and since it was way before special effects, I suspect it was really a person being snatched off the ground.

      Yes, because obviously they couldn't have used a dummy.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  24. Skyhook? I thought, by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    ..The article was referencing this version: http://qbit.cc/cia-money-behind-wi-fi-positioning-system-wps/

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  25. It works - CIA pages sky-hooked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the links on the CIA site give a 404!

  26. Recycling old news in a new wrapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is kind of silly. Devices of this type were used in glider recovery operations during WW2 and recovery of people was no secret. This is simply a new exhibit at an interesting museum but hardly a major discovery. Does the CIA museum mention that they have used automobiles to extract people as well or can that be next year's "discovery?"

  27. The Green Berets by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    The 1960's movie with John Wayne had a Fulton recovery system used in it, toward the end of the movie.

  28. The skyhook was in the movie "Green Berets" by dtjohnson · · Score: 0

    The skyhook was used in the 1968 John Wayne movie "The Green Berets." I think they used it to skyhook a communist agent that they had captured.

    1. Re:The skyhook was in the movie "Green Berets" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you are the 100th person to make exactly the same post in this thread, so you get a special bumper sticker.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  29. It was just on the military channel by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    http://military.discovery.com/videos/top-secret-weapons-revealed-sky-hook.html

    Seems like they found a few good uses for the system.

  30. News for 1960 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading & seeing pictures of this system in use in 1960s.

    Obama is raping the US of A, making us another socialist plunderland & /. has news from 1960s.

  31. This has been well known for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it? In other news, King tut had a nice casket. Check out the pics!

  32. it was called snatch pickup by ImWithBrilliant · · Score: 1

    I’ll be driving the author of that article next week to the annual WWII glider pilot’s reunion. It was called snatch pickup or “the snatch”. About 1-in-8 WWII gliders were launched this way: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA516653 The tow plane’s winch grew out of airmail pickup in the Alleghenies, with the goal posts first used by the Marines in 1927 (there’s a display at the National Museum of the Marine Corps). The physics of a 1946 launch of a 25,000-lb cargo glider into flight: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2009.00190.x/abstract A towed variation retreived telemetry tapes off tracking ships after rocket shots in the 1950’s, and a mid-air version caught spy satellite film. Today only aerial-towed banners are picked up this way.

    --

    Is it a rule, that there's an exception to every rule?

  33. Not one mention by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    Not one mention of MGS: Peace Walker? All Fulton, All The Time.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  34. Saw it in the mid 60's by dizzy8578 · · Score: 1

    I saw this demoed by the 5th Special Forces Group at Fort Bragg on the mid 60's at the "Gabriel Demonstration" area (Dedicated to an early SFG member captured and killed in 1962 in VN) They used a dummy and I think a c-130

    History of the 5th SFG and SP5 Gabrial: http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=77533

    --
    *"Cogito Ergo Liberalis"*
  35. Testing didn't always go so well.... by MasT3quila · · Score: 1

    In "When the Bullet Hits Your Funny bone" http://amzn.com/1606190660 One of the "funny" stories talks about this device and a SEAL being whisked away from a card game. Unfortunately, something went wrong and he released just before reaching the plane. He flashed the bird to the plane as he fell to his death. That was the one tale from that book in which I didn't quite see the humor. Just goes to show how routine this stuff is for those who live it.