Slashdot Mirror


Physicists Propose "Perpetual Motion" Time Crystals

First time accepted submitter b30w0lf writes "It is commonly understood that crystals exist in a state of matter that is periodic in space. Meanwhile, relativistic physics tells us that we should think of time as being a physical dimension, given similar status to the other spacial dimensions. The combination of these two ideas has lead researchers at the University of Kentucky and MIT to propose special manifestations of matter which would be periodic in both space and time, dubbed 'time crystals.' Time crystals would continually transition between a set of physical states in a kind of perpetual motion. Note: the articles stress that this kind of perpetual motion in no way violates the established laws of thermodynamics. While time crystals remain theoretical, methods have been proposed for creating them. The most obvious application of time crystals is the creation of very precise clocks; however, other applications to time crystals have been proposed, ranging from quantum computing to helping us understand certain cosmological models."

153 comments

  1. Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So it should have been flux time crystals, not the flux capacitor...

    Now, where's that Delorean???

    1. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Found it!
      Here you go.

      As a finder's fee, please share tomorrow's winning lotto numbers.

    2. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Doc had it right. Many capacitors use crystal for their dialectic medium.

    3. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the flux capacitor has a temporal crystalline structure? That, or the year 1985 did...

      Now, where's that Delorean???

      If you lost yours, they are popular enough that you can still buy them new or refurbished (at least here in Texas). They've got electric models too.

    4. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      No, time crystals -- no flux involved. Just like in Napolean Dynamite, when Napolean and Uncle Rico electrocuted their balls on the time machine.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    5. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe Doc had it right. Many capacitors use crystal for their dialectic medium.

      Crystals are periodic in space. Fluctuations of EM in an oscillating dielectric crystal is periodic in time...

      In short: The Flux Capacitor IS a Time Crystal.

    6. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 2

      It was some combination of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and 9s.

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    7. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      There's only one way to defeat such awesome predictive powers...lotteries are going to have to start using hexadecimal.

    8. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you reverse the polarity, do they stop forever?

    9. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      We secretly replaced his regular capacitor with these sparkling time crystals

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    10. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Or zeroes.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    11. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

      Blasphemer! This new concept of zero is a heresy against Ra!

      Too soon?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      My hovel for a Slashdot admin account. You'd be +15 Hilarious and -10 Buy Me Another Dr. Pepper and Keyboard!

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    13. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Excellent!

      My first ticket will be xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    14. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      No zeroes?

      ...

      No, wait, even I can't be bothered to work out how much that would improve my chances.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    15. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      My MAC address is FE:ED:FA:CE:DE:AD:BE:EF, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    16. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      I was told zeroes mean nothing

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    17. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was some combination of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and 9s.

      Hey! That's the combination to my luggage!

    18. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      ...And how many of those crystals are in your police box, Doctor?

    19. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, a flux capacitor is a device. This is a material. I'm thinking Thiotimoline. But who knows, maybe the flux capacitor is full of thiotimoline?

    20. Re:Doc Brown had it all wrong... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Sure.. But never introduce opposite polarity time crystals to each other... Most of you won't remember what happened last time. Lets just say, it was really really bad.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  2. Time crysals. What Timecubes are made of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.timecube.com/

    1. Re:Time crysals. What Timecubes are made of by Dreen · · Score: 1

      What the HELL is this website about?!

    2. Re:Time crysals. What Timecubes are made of by davewoods · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, I never thought I would see someone link to Timecube
      I once read through that entire site just to understand what the writer was talking about. I think by the time I was able to wrap my head around it, it had jacked up my world view, and I had to spend a day watching Youtube videos of cats to get back to normal.

  3. Seems reasonable by roidzrus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm pretty sure this is what the Power Rangers used to beat Lord Zedd.

  4. It'll make lots of sense by future+assassin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure when I re-read it after smoking a couple of joints.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:It'll make lots of sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      nope, way ahead of ya mate.
      Vodka's not working either.

    2. Re:It'll make lots of sense by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      Not sure about that. It doesn't seem like a whole lot new.

      All matter already has a 'perpetual motion' setup anyway. It's often called 'zero point energy'. I believe it's related to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, but can be ound without assuming the HUP. At the lowest possible vibrational state, an object still has vibrational energy - meaning it is still vibrating. Even if the direction is random, this is perpetual motion.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  5. Hmm... well, be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't want any unforeseen consequences.

  6. Oh No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is how it starts. First we get some time crystals, then the next thing you know some asshole is creating a race of genetically engineered aliens to destroy earth by manipulating the time stream.

    1. Re:Oh No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, its time to split

    2. Re:Oh No by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Well, when you phrase it like you make it sound like a bad thing. :-)

    3. Re:Oh No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, they don't start bothering with that until the 4th spin-off, so you know nothing can really "change" all that much.

  7. They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by KBentley57 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If one reads the article, in the last paragraph the statement occurs: "Time crystals may sound dangerously close to a perpetual motion machine, but it is worth emphasizing one key difference: while time crystals would indeed move periodically in an eternal loop, rotation occurs in the ground state, with no work being carried out nor any usable energy being extracted from the system." They aren't proposing "mechanical perpetual motion" like we are probably all thinking at first glance. The crystal isn't doing anything abnormal. No energy is to be gained from the system, so at least mechanically, nothing is happening.

    1. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perpetual motion is one of Newton's Laws: an object in motion tends to stay in motion.

    2. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so at least mechanically, nothing is happening.

      It's like calling electrons around a proton a "perpetual motion machine". You get perpetual motion, so long as you don't extract energy from it. In fact, from that definition, the heat death of the universe is itself a perpetual motion machine, as everything will be vibrating/moving in entropy. No work may be extracted.

    3. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      so at least mechanically, nothing is happening.

      It's like calling electrons around a proton a "perpetual motion machine". You get perpetual motion, so long as you don't extract energy from it. In fact, from that definition, the heat death of the universe is itself a perpetual motion machine, as everything will be vibrating/moving in entropy. No work may be extracted.

      By that definition everything is a perpetual motion machine.

    4. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is literally the meaning of perpetual motion. What they don't claim is free energy.

    5. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I will upset somebody here but Newtons 1st law relating to motion clearly defines perpetual motion, because the only way motion is altered is by action of an external force. Literally it will continue forever unless acted on by an external force.

      Now as to doing work. If you can by simple process extract energy stored in any level say temperature (molecular motion) to direct actual work and the molecular motion while reduced by your actions regenerates itself spontaneously due to ambient radiation, then you can do work without fuel. This would appear to be what is called "perpetual motion". This can actually be demonstrated using a thermo-electric device which receives IR signals and converts them to electrical impulses. CCD devices will do this. As a result the CCD then generates electricity (trivial as it may be) which does work and is continually regenerated by ambient heat. Guess what, this is perpetual in action and requires no fuel. Similar devices can be built using permanent magnetic fields as source as well.

      Now that I have ticked off the unscientific guardians of "fact" in /. have a nice day!

    6. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's heat death when work can no longer be extracted from something?

      Because I think some of my coworkers have come down with that....

    7. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a lot like a piece of copper wire that could be conducting or not conducting... Am gettting tired of pseudo science

    8. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by jfengel · · Score: 1

      In what way is it different from the periodic motion of a pendulum or a planet?

      Periodic motion is nothing new. The conservation of momentum and energy in the absence of friction or other forces is also old hat, and nobody thinks it's anything akin to perpetual motion. So what's going on here that's actually novel?

    9. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by radtea · · Score: 1

      It's like calling electrons around a proton a "perpetual motion machine".

      There's actually a book from the '50's or '60's by physicist Alan Stewart called "Perpetual Motion" that uses exactly this hook to talk about atomic physics (long out of print, and I can't find anything about it via the Great Search Engine, so perhaps it's all in my imagination.)

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    10. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by radtea · · Score: 1

      The last paragraph also suggests that universe might be in such a state of bi-periodic motion, and then asks, "if such a state requires an observer to make it work, who is the observer in the case of the universe?" or something like that.

      The idea that "observation" of a quantum system requires consciousness is controversial at best, and generally not held by working physicists, although mathematicians like Penrose sometimes argue for it.

      Beyond that, the question seems like an open invitation to answer in terms of various Bronze Age myths, as if "X requires a conciousness observing the universe; my favourite Bronze Age Myth posits a conscioussness observing the universe; therefore the conciousness observing the universe must be the one identified in my favourite Bronze Age myth" was an argument rather than a logical fallacy to the tune of "Humans crossed the Atlantic Ocean in the late 1400's; I believe humans in the late 1400's could fly by flapping their arms; therefore humans must have crossed the Atlantic Ocean in the late 1400's by flapping their arms."

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    11. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by c0lo · · Score: 1

      No work may be extracted.

      You sure speak of my workstation... while reading /.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    12. Re:They do not propose "Perpetual Motion" by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Everything is. The problem is that "perpetual motion" is taken to be "perpetual motion, even when work is being done" or "more energy out than energy in". There's nothing wrong with "perpetual motion" A pendulum in a vacuum is a perpetual motion machine, the problem is there is no ideal frictionless string, or perfect vacuum. But even if you did make one, you'd never get any useful work from it.

  8. I have hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While time crystals remain theoretical, ....

    So was the Higgs boson at one time.

    Maybe they'll create or discover these in my lifetime.

    1. Re:I have hope! by narcc · · Score: 1

      So was the Higgs boson at one time.

      Like, right now.

    2. Re:I have hope! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Nah, you can buy them on eBay for $14.95 plus shipping. I have a bunch for sale. Trust me, they're legitimate*.

      * By purchasing said Higgs Boson, you agree to the license which states the clear epoxy cube may not be tested or examined in any sort of way, at any point in time. Any sort of testing or examination will cause a Schrodinger Effect, rendering the particle to either be or not be there. In some rare cases, examination may result in the cube containing a dead cat.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  9. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by dreamchaser · · Score: 0

    Whoosh. That was the sound of the GP's sarcasm flying over your head.

  10. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by mcrbids · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not that we're on topic or anything, but most of the money Romney donated to "charity" was to his church, which gives almost nothing to the poor, but spends an incredible amount of money to send their young members to knock on your door.

    Think about that next time you answer the door and see them. Again.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  11. Metaphysics for 1000 by Empiric · · Score: 1

    Could the postulated cyclic evolution of the Universe be seen as a manifestation of spontaneous symmetry breaking akin to that of a time crystal? If so, who is the observer inducing--by a measurement--the breaking of the symmetry of time?

    Salome?

    Jesus said, "Two will rest on a bed: the one will die, and the other will live."
    Salome said, "Who are you, man, that you ... have come up on my couch and eaten from my table?"
    Jesus said to her, "I am he who exists from the undivided. I was given some of the things of my Father."
    "I am your disciple."
    "Therefore I say, if he is destroyed, he will be filled with light, but if he is divided, he will be filled with darkness."


    --Thomas


    Come on, you know a cat would be among the least-interesting things to have in the superposition box.

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    1. Re:Metaphysics for 1000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dafuq?

    2. Re:Metaphysics for 1000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dafuq?

      I guess Jesus ate the hash brownies from her table.

    3. Re:Metaphysics for 1000 by niado · · Score: 1

      Seems kind of offtopic, but that's a quote from the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas, considered apocryphal by most Christian sects.

  12. It's like Seinfeld. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A energy state about nothing.

    1. Re:It's like Seinfeld. by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      call it the Sien field

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:It's like Seinfeld. by able1234au · · Score: 1

      i will pay that one...

    3. Re:It's like Seinfeld. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      you blew it... Sine Field

  13. Just one question: by Pluvius · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do these crystals have a cubic structure?

    Maybe we were all educated stupid after all...

    Rob

    1. Re:Just one question: by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Come on, this much should be obvious, they have a tesseract structure !

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  14. Life immitates art... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Well, I hope not.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  15. Been there, done that by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's where Krypton keeps their most dangerous criminals, duh!

  16. why stop at time crystals? by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    why not build a time cube?

    i know of a distinguished scientist who has spoken at numerous universities, including MIT, on his groundbreaking work in this area:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Cube#Public_reaction

    note: if you visit http://timecube.com/ for the first time in a decade, like i just did, you discover that gene ray has been experimenting with javascript, but i don't think he got the effect he was looking for. i think he is trying to profit from clicks, but i think he mangled the code and you get a page redirect whenever you try to load his site. i guess deep knowledge of time cubez does not translate into mad html skillz

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  17. You can't read it (without other power) by Sarusa · · Score: 3, Informative

    One key point that makes it not a free energy machine is that you can't actually read it or otherwise do anything useful with it (nor can it do anything) without spending extra external energy.

    And in any normal situation, like sitting in a room on Earth, you might even have to spend energy keeping it undisturbed by things like thermal jostling (i.e., cooled to near absolute zero).

    1. Re:You can't read it (without other power) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      One key point that makes it not a free energy machine is that you can't actually read it or otherwise do anything useful with it (nor can it do anything) without spending extra external energy.

      Well, even if you can't, I think it would be cool if you routed your car's power through a perpetual motion machine, just to say one was involved.

    2. Re:You can't read it (without other power) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One key point that makes it not a free energy machine is that ...

      One would think the key point that makes it not free energy, is that no one claims it is (except one lone slashdot submitter who didn't even read the article... Probably the slashdot editor too. But no one else!)

  18. Had these on Land of the Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, this is old news, they had these on Land of the Lost.

    http://www.tvacres.com/metals_pylons.htm

  19. ZPM by Ryan101 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Stargate SG-1 called; they want their ZPM back.

    1. Re:ZPM by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      ZPM's aren't even perpetual motion devices, they have limited (but extremely high) energy capacity.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  20. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's hilarious is that blue states by and large subsidize red states. Hey Alabama, how do you like those roads and welfare California paid for? The political climate in this country is so screwy that you basically have one set of Americans (blue states) saying 'hey rural poor people we really want to help you out by paying taxes for basic needs like infrastructure and food' and red states saying 'damn communist let us live in third world conditions'. Well, it'd be hilarious if it wasn't so fucked up.

  21. Yet Another Sci-Fi Time Crystal by JoeRandomHacker · · Score: 1

    Back to the 70's, and ancient Atlantis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Time_Monster

    1. Re:Yet Another Sci-Fi Time Crystal by lennier · · Score: 1

      Back to the 70's, and ancient Atlantis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Time_Monster

      I initially misread that as "... and ancient Ataris".

      Which was even scarier than the Doctor Who premise.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    2. Re:Yet Another Sci-Fi Time Crystal by JoeRandomHacker · · Score: 1

      Back to the 70's, and ancient Atlantis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Time_Monster

      I initially misread that as "... and ancient Ataris".

      Which was even scarier than the Doctor Who premise.

      As long as you have a decent supply of Epyx 500XJ joysticks, I don't see anything to be afraid of. (You'll need to replace them periodically 'cause the little plastic bit inside holding the guts in place tends to break.)

  22. Disappointed by EdIII · · Score: 1

    I was expecting to see the article authored by Rick Marshall.

  23. time is not a dimension by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 2

    it is a co-dimension.

    if you don't understand the difference, go study

    1. Re:time is not a dimension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have studied, understand difference, recognise complete horse pucky when it's produced.

    2. Re:time is not a dimension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      oh, so now dimensions with the other sign are called codimensions. Got it.

      Not sure what textbook that came out of, I've never seen that convention before.

    3. Re:time is not a dimension by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Informative

      Links please!

      Conversely, for those interested in the other half of the equation -- namely understanding the spatial dimension -- a new paradigm such as bivectors, trivectors, antiscalar, wedge product is necessary.

      A Bigger Mathematical Picture for Computer Graphics (Eric Lengyel)
      http://www.terathon.com/wscg12_lengyel.pdf

      A Unified Language for Mathematics and Physics
      http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.134.6311&rep=rep1&type=pdf

      Clifford Algebra and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
      http://www.montgomerycollege.edu/Departments/planet/planet/Numerical_Relativity/Geometric_Algebra/caiqm.pdf

      The Unified Family of all physical quantities
      http://www.naturics.eu/?page_id=1068

    4. Re:time is not a dimension by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 1

      You are moving at the speed of light through time. If you accelerate in space, you slow down in time.
      That's the difference. You cannot change your velocity through spacetime, you can only alter your direction.
      If you manage to go at lightspeed through space, you'll be standing still in time. Codimension.

    5. Re:time is not a dimension by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 1

      Thanks for these.

    6. Re:time is not a dimension by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > If you accelerate in space, you slow down in time.
      Yes, I agree, time and space seems to be inversely related.

      > You cannot change your velocity through spacetime, you can only alter your direction.
      Hmm, that's not quite right as that doesn't explain Time Travel.

      Looks like we have a paradox ... now the _really_ interesting question is how the hell do we resolved these 2 (contradictory) truths ! Now one possible solution would be that vel > c = -time !? Definitely need to explore this!

      Thanks for the explanation of Codimension BTW !

  24. conway's game of life by slew · · Score: 1

    Somehow, that's what comes to mind when I think about this...

    Of course the reality is that it requires some sort of symmetry breaking field (where the mathematics work out like an oscillating soliton).

    The problem of course is that if such a minimum energy oscillating system existed, you would likely not be able to use it like a clock since once you attempted to measure it somehow, you would likely disturb in a way where it would no longer be accurate going forward.

    Maybe this could be used in some weird thought experiment as a timer in along with Schrödinger's cat? If you look at the timer before it expires, the cat is dead, if you wait until the timer expires, the cat is alive, but if you don't look at the timer, the cat is still in a superposition between alive and dead? Okay, maybe that's just silly ;^)

  25. Re:commonly understood by Jamu · · Score: 2

    There are Quasicrystals. These are ordered in space, but not periodic.

    --
    Who ordered that?
  26. Those damn Sleestaks from the the future... by dugrrr · · Score: 1

    ...they're gonna take all of our jobs!

  27. Crystals by Coppit · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    1. Re:Crystals by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      I still wanna find out whatever that guy was smoking... whoever modded you down has *no* sense of humor!

      --
      C|N>K
  28. Re:commonly understood by lennier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is commonly understood that crystals exist in a state of matter that is periodic in space.

    If your Bullshit Detector didn't go off as soon you read this in the original post

    Mine didn't. Does yours need calibration?

    A crystal structure is composed of a pattern, a set of atoms arranged in a particular way, and a lattice exhibiting long-range order and symmetry. Patterns are located upon the points of a lattice, which is an array of points repeating periodically in three dimensions.

    Periodicity is a well-defined concept.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  29. Isaac Asimov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thiotimoline

  30. Re:commonly understood by lennier · · Score: 1

    There are Quasicrystals. These are ordered in space, but not periodic.

    ... hence the "quasi".

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  31. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To charity? More than Mitt. Mitt donated to a big business that isn't a "charity" in any sense of the word, other than tax write off.

  32. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by AK+Marc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Alabama receives more for roads than Alabama pays for roads. Someone is subsidizing roads in AL. The fact your math is bad doesn't change the facts.

  33. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "young members" pay for themselves to go door knocking.

  34. Final Fantasy had it right all along by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

    Crystals really have amazing and out-of-this-world powers!

    Now where is my mithra porn, damnit?

    1. Re:Final Fantasy had it right all along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now where is my mithra porn, damnit?

      What you're looking for is in that red materia labeled "Shiva".

  35. and radiation means zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does transition form states of matter happen without energy ....remember that lil bit about "things like to do what they already are doing"
    my bet is this will cost you more then its worth in terms of energy or devices we use now...and time is NOT a dimension

    space-time is a dimension that we live in that has 3 dimensions, it can be curved and bent and theoretical pushed through , but it is not separate on its own or we'd have time travel both ways without issues. UGH where do we get these idiots and whose wasting money now.

  36. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by GoogleShill · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What he's saying is accurate. States which typically vote Republican are the states which contribute the least in Federal taxes, but receive the most in Federal aid.

    http://taxfoundation.org/blog/why-do-some-states-feast-federal-spending-not-others

    As for your disillusioned Obama comment... He wants to make people pay their fair share of taxes while Romney wants the middle class to "distribute" their wealth up the chain so it lands in some dudes bank account, not helping the economy at all. Spending money helps the economy, hoarding it doesn't.

  37. TARDIS by Kyrubas · · Score: 1

    One step closer to making myself a functional TARDIS...

  38. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by drkim · · Score: 0

    ... Obama wants to make you broker!

    Hey - nobody makes us broker than Republicans!

    http://www.poolepartners.com.au/images/stories/March_2012/Dow_Jones_Historical_Chart_5_Year.png

  39. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by drkim · · Score: 2

    "Mormon fuck."

    Of course, the intellectual capacity of the leftist drone on full display.

    Thank you for proving my point.

    You left out:

    "...moron Mormon fuck."

    Let's give him credit for cute alliteration.

  40. Gallifreyan technology by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure they use this stuff in TARDISes.

  41. Re:commonly understood by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Is it called chemistry?

  42. I am a Mormon. You are incorrect by portforward · · Score: 2

    Please before you repeat your misinformation, this is an article from a website called Philanthropy Round Table. The article is called

    A Welfare System That Works
    The Latter-day Saints are proving that private citizens can support a vast and effective social welfare system.

    http://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/topic/excellence_in_philanthropy/a_welfare_system_that_works

    Please understand that we have very, very few employees. Almost all of the funds that go into the church go to buildings, the universities, missionary work and charity. It is a common misconception that many people repeat. I had a responsibility in our local congregation and I saw the checks coming in and out. We helped people with rent, electricity, water and medical bills. Some people went to what we call the "Bishop's storehouse" which is kind of like a grocery store where you don't pay for the food.

    Seriously, before you say things about the LDS church, first check with a member first. We HAVE to tell you the truth. If we lie, we go to hell. : )

    1. Re:I am a Mormon. You are incorrect by blackwizard · · Score: 2

      OK, just wondering. Is it a members-only charity? Can I walk in [as an atheist] and receive benefits?

    2. Re:I am a Mormon. You are incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - and multi billion dollar shopping malls that enrich Salt Lake City TMB developers / contractors. Then tell me why the "humanitarian" budget is 1.5%

    3. Re:I am a Mormon. You are incorrect by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      We HAVE to tell you the truth. If we lie, we go to hell. : )

      Wow... your bible really IS different. Mine says "do not slander, e.g., bear false witness. If your kid asks "how do you like my pretty picture?" are you going to tell the truth, "gee, hon, sorry but that really sucks" or "That's nice, dear! I like it!" Hint: in this case, the truth is a sin. "Suffer the little children" and all that.

      My ex-wife is a mormon, and she scared the hell out of my youngest (25 yrs old) when she told her you have to be baptised to go to heaven. I pointed out Luke 23:43, when the unbaptised thief hanging on the cross converted to Christ, and Christ told him he would be in paradise with him that very day.

      And what's with the secrecy? Secret rituals, etc. My daughters weren't allowed to attend their mother's remarriage because they weren't Mormon. Is there any other single religion that does that? Your church, from what I hear from my daughter, is a lot more like the Christian Scientists than any real Christian church.

      My bible teaches that my sins are already paid for. If you accept Christ as your lord and savior, why would you have to pay for your sins when Christ already paid the tab?

      Sorry, I don't care much for your religion. Me, I'll stick to nondenominational Christianity. I've been in a lot of different Christian churches (Baptist, Methodist, Catholic, Lutherin) and none of them had any of the crap Joe Smith came up with.

      At least you guys are better than a certain church in Florida...

    4. Re:I am a Mormon. You are incorrect by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      OK, just wondering. Is it a members-only charity? Can I walk in [as an atheist] and receive benefits?

      I doubt it -- my ex-wife converted to Mormonism, and my daughters weren't allowed to attend her re-wedding because they're not Mormons.

      OTOH a Christian church will indeed let you, an athiest, walk in and be helped. Last year they completely remodeled the poorest (public!) elementary school in town and gave each family who had a kid there two weeks worth of groceries over Christmas vacation, because the poor kids are dependant on that school breakfast and lunch. Some kids, that's all they get to eat in a day.

      This year they're targeting the second poorest school.

      $90,000 went to Africa last year from my church. I'm pretty proud of my it (even though that's a sin ;)

      Other churches have food pantries and soup kitchens all over the city (well, on the poor side anyway), and they don't even ask for ID, just walk in for lunch. Mormons welcome, Catholics welcome, Muslims welcome, athiests welcome.

      God loves everybody. He even loves athiests. Somebody should tell that to the Mormons...

  43. You are incorrect about how money is spent by the by portforward · · Score: 2

    LDS church. Missionaries are mostly self funded. Also, the church has a well recognized welfare system. In fact, there was just an article about the LDS charitable system in a website called "Philanthropy Roundtable"

    A Welfare System That Works
    The Latter-day Saints are proving that private citizens can support a vast and effective social welfare system.

    http://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/topic/excellence_in_philanthropy/a_welfare_system_that_works

    The LDS church doesn't have a professional clergy, and in fact has relatively few employees. Most of the funds go to buildings, the universities, and charities. Before repeating the common misconception that the LDS church doesn't act as a charity, you should ask a Mormon first.

  44. Re:commonly understood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful. You've just conflated mathematical periodicity with physical periodicity. They're not the same thing.

    A periodic mathematical function repeats infinitely: f(n) = f(n + T); therefore \forall n,k f(n) = f(n + k*T).
    A periodic physical property has discrete elements that obey the periodic relationship, but there is no implied induction / infinite continuation.

    Any proof that attempts to use the mathematical concept cannot be applied to physical reality without very strong additional proof that the property holds.

  45. Re:commonly understood by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

    It should be obvious that these would be identical in every way to what is known as "resonance".

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  46. the interesting bit.. by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

    the interesting bit, at the end, is about how this type of thinking makes a cyclic universe seem explainable as a time crystal, which i mean to take as a no-energy gain or loss ground state oscillating between it's states. but it was pretty hard making that sort of assumption, myself. i wonder what they see about that that fits our model so well; perhaps just because we have some math for it, being the universal language, pun intended.

    --
    CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
  47. Size does matter by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

    It occurs to me ... how large are normal crystals? Has anyone ever heard of a crystal a light-second across? If the size of a time crystal corresponds to the size of normal crystals ... picoseconds? Not very practical.

  48. Perpetual Motion is not impossible by lukeskywalker9m · · Score: 1

    Electrons are perpetual motion around nuclear. I think we can make a perpetual machine by harvesting universal expansion.

  49. pompous nonsense? by viking80 · · Score: 1

    I started reading and just stopped after the first paragraph:
    "Spontaneous symmetry breaking is ubiquitous in nature. It occurs when the ground state (classically, the lowest energy state) of a system is less symmetrical than the equations governing the system. Examples in which the symmetry is broken in excited states are common—one just needs to think of Kepler’s elliptical orbits, which break the spherical symmetry of the gravitational force"

    Can someone educate me, as this appears to be cargo science:
    - How can an "energy state be less symmetrical then the equation for the system". Seems wrong semantically, mathematically and physically?
    - How can on state that "elliptical orbits break the spherical symmetry of the gravitational force". How can a simple principle be misunderstood with such pompous nonsense?
    - and is the ground state *not* the lowest enerygy state in quantum mechanics as implied in first sentence?

    It only gets worse from there.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
  50. Cargo cult science by viking80 · · Score: 1
    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
  51. Heat - the Fourth Dimension by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    some think time isnthe fourth dimension..

    for others, the Fourth Dimension is Heat!!

    2cents
    jp

  52. Relatavistic physic by WillKemp · · Score: 1

    Relativistic physics can tell us whatever it likes, but it's quite obvious that time isn't a physical dimension and it's in no way similar to the spatial dimensions. You can move through the spatial dimensions, because all points (x, y, and z) actually exist. But only the present exists in time - everything else either has gone and doesn't exist any more or hasn't come yet and doesn't exist yet. It may all look similar mathematically, but in reality it isn't. And nobody will ever prove otherwise.

    1. Re:Relatavistic physic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your model is wrong and doesn't agree with reality.

  53. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    "Mormon fuck."

    Of course, the intellectual capacity of the leftist drone on full display.

    Thank you for proving my point.

    If being against a stupid recently-made-up religion is leftist, why would you want to be rightist?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  54. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by rgbrenner · · Score: 0

    ... bank account, not helping the economy at all.

    Money in a bank account does help the economy. It provides banks with more funds, which allows them to make more loans and reduce interest rates, allowing business to invest more.

    Of course, what that leaves out is that while consumer spending has reached pre-recession levels, business-investment spending is about $150B lower than 2008, and banks have plenty of funds (exceeding their funding requirements). In fact, business investment is the one area of the economy that has not recovered to pre-2008 levels.
    http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/07/the-mission-1-4-trillion-one-chart-that-says-u-s-business-investment-isnt-doing-fine/

    So for whatever reason (banks not making loans, or businesses not wanting to invest, or inadequate investment opportunities, etc), in effect you are right.

  55. Good news everyone! by jeffclay · · Score: 1

    Good news everyone!
    UK (University of Kentucky) does have smart people!

    I think I watch too much Futurama.

  56. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by dywolf · · Score: 0

    So much BS. Can't breathe.
    Oh and hey! +5 insightful too. Shocking.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  57. Dilithium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like this is a description of Star Trek's "dilithium."

  58. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How typical. Leftist: Everyone should be treated equally and be accepted by society! Except any religious people. Nice hypocrisy, man.

  59. Napoleon Dynamite? by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

    Is it April Fools in October?

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  60. Mormons help people who are not mormons by portforward · · Score: 1

    I have first hand knowledge of this, as I saw the checks and food orders* that went out and went personally with our Bishop at times. We almost never just hand people money but rather pay for bills and rent. But, since you can never believe random people on Slashdot, according to that article I linked to:

    "That spirit of generosity funds a vast private welfare system, one that serves hundreds of thousands of people each year. This welfare system serves mostly—but not exclusively—fellow Latter-day Saints who are in need. It is intended for people who have lost their jobs, who have been injured, or whose families are going through some other kind of hardship. Self-sufficiency is at the heart of its mission—both for the givers and receivers."

    In essence, Mormons believe that if you are going to call yourself a Christian, you must follow His example. Giving of yourself, your time and your resources to "mourn with those that mourn and comfort those in need of comfort" is central. The Book of Mormon is very explicit about this need of helping the poor.

    By the way, thank you for the respectful way that you asked your question. Most of the time we don't get that, and it never hurts to ask an honest question. There are some people who dislike our church for various reasons and spread FUD whenever they can. I will never mock atheists for what they believe, because at one point in my life I pretty much was an atheist. I can see how one could arrive at that conclusion. If you are curious, prayer brought me back.

    * Food orders come from the Bishop's Storehouse. Basically after you speak to the Bishop, you then speak to a woman who represents what we call the Relief Society. She talks with you about your needs, and fills out a form indicating that you need, say, five pounds of fruit, two loaves of bread, a Turkey, 10 cans of soup, a jar of peanut butter, two cans of peaches, a broom, diapers, etc., then you go to the Bishop's Storehouse where a volunteer helps you fill out your order. No money is exchanged. If you look at the picture in the article, you will see President Reagan talking with two men. One of the men is former LDS Leader Gordon B. Hinkley. Anyway, there is a sign behind them that says "Deseret The Brand Money Can't Buy"

    1. Re:Mormons help people who are not mormons by blackwizard · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Have you personally seen non-believers receive assistance? If so, are they expected or encouraged to give back to the church in some way? I personally would feel guilty about receiving assistance from a church. Welfare works because people who aren't actively using it are still paying into the system. I wouldn't feel as guilty about receiving unemployment (for example) since I have paid a lot of money into that system. It's too bad your church spends money on things I don't support, otherwise it might be worth joining just for the safety net. =) Maybe you can come out with a non-believers insurance plan - a mere x% of your income, and you too can have guilt-free access to these excellent benefits! ;-) Just need to hire a good accountant to make sure you aren't spending that on anti gay rights propaganda.

    2. Re:Mormons help people who are not mormons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I wouldn't feel as guilty about receiving unemployment (for example) since I have paid a lot of money into that system....

      That is really at the heart of the problem. This is the fundamental problem with government handouts. No one is embarrassed by free handouts anymore, it's now seen as just another source of income.

    3. Re:Mormons help people who are not mormons by blackwizard · · Score: 1

      I fail to see your point. To me, the church and the government here are doing the exact same thing: taxing people and giving them benefits in return. The "heart of the problem" isn't how people feel about receiving benefits. It's the fact that in our society, some people often get ahead at the expense of others who are left behind. That's called "capitalism". Some people, like the Mormon church, don't think that it's right for the system to leave people behind. So they come up with safety nets. I fail to see anything wrong with that.

  61. that's nothing! by HPHatecraft · · Score: 1

    The submitter obviously hasn't heard of PYRAMID POWER! I said "PYRAMID POWER"!! Yeah. Never mind. I thought it would work, but that was pretty dumb. PYRAMID POWER-R-R-R-R-R-R-R!!!

  62. Romney's Road to Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If one considers the

    Golden Rule
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule

    the

    Allegory of the Long Spoons
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_long_spoons

    and

    Obama's "We're All In This Together"

    vs.

    Romney's "You're On Your Own" visions for America,

    it becomes quite clear that Romney would lead us down the road to Hell.

  63. So that's why the time machine I bought... by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    ...on ebay didn't work! I forgot to add the time crystals!

    .

  64. beware the opening of the time tombs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Shrike comes.

  65. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by GoogleShill · · Score: 0

    Nice rebuttal.

  66. Wikipedia link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  67. Re:Attention Radical Free Software Leftists! by BevanFindlay · · Score: 1

    Parent has been modded down to zero, but he does actually make a point: your tolerance only exists as far as it exists towards the person with whom you disagree the most. While it is an over-generalisation, there are quite a few people who express the view "be tolerant(tm) to everyone except if I think they're intolerant." To again somewhat over-generalise, this view seems to me to be more common in those who are "leftist" than others (YMMV).

    (I put the sarcastic "(tm)" in there because "tolerance" has been taken recently to mean "don't say anything that might offend someone", whereas it actually - or used to - mean "being able to respectfully disagree"; tolerance only starts when you disagree).

  68. Re:commonly understood by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

    An important thing to note is that while periodic they are still finite; the periodicity ends at the edge of the crystal.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  69. To answer your question by portforward · · Score: 1

    I have personally seen non-believers receive assistance. Like I said, I was the Ward Clerk, so I saw the financial records at the congregational level. We support local food banks and national and international relief organizations. The idea is to build self-sufficiency. Once you are on a stable spiritual and financial footing then it is your duty to help others. Again, you don't have to be a member. I know that if, (for example) you are looking for a job, then after you speak to your local Bishop then you can get a reference to a job bank. It is staffed by volunteers. The vast majority of work in our church is done by volunteers.

    Look, I know that we have a weird image. Part of that is our fault*, but mostly it is because some people want others to think that we are this way. They are very vocal, and want to embarrass the church in any way possible. I don't know if you are aware of some of the weird stuff that goes on but when I was a child my parents took me to the Seattle Temple open house and protesters were hanging two former LDS leaders (Joseph Smith and Spencer W. Kimball) in effigy across the street at a fire station. There is a wall around the temple in Salt Lake, and it is customary for newlyweds to have their pictures taken on the steps. There are some religious groups that actually protested someone's wedding and screamed obscenities. I remember walking to our General Conference at Salt Lake City when a group of people were beating drums outside the walls. I've heard all sorts of things about my religion that if I didn't know the truth would scare me to death. But I know what really goes on, and so it just becomes an annoyance. As for "gay rights", the church leadership supports homosexual civil unions, just not calling it marriage. In the same vein, you can believe me or not, but we don't sit around much and talk about gay marriage. A little, but not much. We are pretty busy with other things.

    *For example members in good standing don't do illegal drugs, drink alcohol, smoke tobacco, or drink tea and coffee. While I don't consume any of those things, they don't define my faith. I often tell other members, "if we are known as 'the church that doesn't drink coffee' then we aren't doing our jobs very well." Instead we should be known for honesty, integrity, charity, kindness, helpfulness and love. Sometimes we do a better job than others.

    1. Re:To answer your question by blackwizard · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the response.

      As for "gay rights", the church leadership supports homosexual civil unions, just not calling it marriage. In the same vein, you can believe me or not, but we don't sit around much and talk about gay marriage. A little, but not much.

      I take issue with this. Your church should not be pushing its definition of marriage into law. If a gay couple can't be married at a Mormon church, that's fine with me. They can always leave. But that couple should be able to elope at a local courthouse. Civil unions do not provide the same rights, privileges and responsibilities under current law that marriage does.

  70. Oh, one more thing by portforward · · Score: 1

    LDS Welfare is intended to be a temporary thing. It is at the discretion of the Bishop how long to continue, or under what conditions they are to continue. Sometimes the length of the help is a one day thing (like helping a transient get out of the cold, a change of clothes and a shower and bed for the night) or long term help for rent. The intent is to get the person back into a position where they can work. Sometimes there is the expectation that they are supposed to volunteer somewhere, like move boxes at the Bishop's Storehouse. Sometimes there isn't. Like I said, it is up to the discretion of the Bishop.

    1. Re:Oh, one more thing by blackwizard · · Score: 1

      I see. Do you know if there is there a publicly available breakdown of the income and expenses? It would be interesting to know how much money the church receives from various sources, and how it gets spent.