Slashdot Mirror


Intel To Help Stephen Hawking Communicate Faster

hypnosec writes "Stephen Hawking's ability to communicate has been deteriorating over the years and as it stands, he is only able to communicate at the rate of 1 word per minute. Intel CTO Justin Rattner has revealed that they are working on an interface that will boost the scientist's speech to up to 10 words per minute. Beyond twitching his cheek, Hawking is also capable of other voluntary facial expressions which can be tapped to achieve faster communications with the help of a better character interface and a better word predictor."

133 comments

  1. the most interesting tech intel puts out these day by stooo · · Score: 0

    the most interesting tech intel puts out these days

    --
    aaaaaaa
  2. damn you autocorrect ... by Dark$ide · · Score: 2

    They're going to have to enhance the aurocorrect dictionary or it will make complete nonsense of Prof. Hawking's very technical speech.

    --

    Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    1. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      Probably the other way round, it might grab sense from the jaws of his hard-to-understand utterings...

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    2. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      The secret to time travel is to faux eat lemons.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    3. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by youn · · Score: 1

      Lol, excuse me while I go to te grocery store and get some fake lemon :)

      --
      Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    4. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

      "fish fingers and custard"

    5. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      if, as reported here recently, Watson can master Urban Dictionary then the literature for the grand unified theory shouldn't cause 'it' too much problems.

      Hook Hawking's wheelchair up to Watson via wifi/3g and you're all set...

    6. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      The beauty of computers is without a sense of context, the conceptual difficulty of hardcore physics vs urban dictionaries sailor slurs would be completely irrelevant to it. So your probably right actually.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    7. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      The secret to time travel is to faux eat lemons.

      The secret to faux time travel is to faux eat faux lemons.

    8. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Ah, ReaLemon. It there anything you can't do?

      Cat and bird spray, room freshener, food additive, and now time travel!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    9. Re:damn you autocorrect ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well obviously the autocorrect will keep "correcting" correct things to wrong things as it always does. This will be interesting coupled with Hawking's ability do the following : "twitching his cheek". The more autocorrect incorrectly "corrects", the more one will be tempted to twitch. My suggestion is therefore that the twitch is given one meaning and one meaning only "No, you stupid autocorrect, I do not mean any of your stupid correction options, I mean what I say, not what you want me to say".

  3. I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Instead of rehashing 1970s tech, could we PLEASE start understanding how the human body works and why some bodies destroy themselves in this way? It would be FAR cooler to have a molecule that goes in there and repairs this damage. Atoms arranged THEMSELVES into working nerves once, they can do it again.

    Is this too complex for us as a species? What happened to the "we choose to do these things not because they are easy, but because they are hard" spirit?

    1. Re:I have an idea by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well I suspect principally because a company which builds computer hardware doesn't have a very large bioscience division.

    2. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? They're the same thing when looked at the right way.

    3. Re:I have an idea by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Instead of rehashing 1970s tech, could we PLEASE start understanding how the human body works and why some bodies destroy themselves in this way?

      Could you PLEASE stop assuming that there aren't thousands upon thousands of people actively engaged in all areas of medical science trying to do exactly this?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re: I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to figure out if you are trolling, or just that ignorant.

    5. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The overlap is still too small.

    6. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The perfect is the enemy of the good.

    7. Re:I have an idea by Jmc23 · · Score: 0
      There is such a molecule. It comes from cannabis. Unfortunately it has to be directed by awareness.

      The real problem is that people are just too lazy to accomplish great things, they'd rather be handed a solution on a platter that requires no input from them.

      For example, people could learn how to use their eyes properly, or they can stick with the same viewpoint, ignoring the physical world, and buy a pair of glasses that supports their inflexibility.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    8. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Instead of rehashing 1970s tech, could we PLEASE start understanding how the human body works and why some bodies destroy themselves in this way?

      Could you PLEASE stop assuming that there aren't thousands upon thousands of people actively engaged in all areas of medical science trying to do exactly this?

      Could you please explain why one of the most brilliant men of all time is sitting in a 70's era wheel chair using a fucking joystick and his cheek to try and type words when we already have EEG-based headcaps that fucking MONKEYS can use to play goddamn video games?
      Seriously man, quit making excuses. Biomedical technology for the disabled is at least 30 years behind CONSUMER technology and at least 50 years behind where it should be. He ought to be walking around his house in a thought- controlled, self-powered exoskeleton right now, and no I'm not joking for even a second. At the very least he should have a head-cap based interface for using his computer system instead of a half-assed muscle-proxy mechanism. And that's with shit that's damn near available at WalMart, no fucking joke.
      The state of actual medical research to fix conditions like his is in just as sorry of a state. Companies are too busy pouring cash into penis pills and weight loss drugs to spend R&D money on tailoring targeted DNA rejuvenation treatments. No, it's not just Sci-Fi, or rather it ought not to be, but assholes like you act like this is being feverishly worked on around the clock when in reality nobody is doing a GODDAMN THING.

    9. Re: I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the presidential speech committing the nation to this goal, please? You guys got your fireworks decades ago, can we get biotech now?

    10. Re:I have an idea by amRadioHed · · Score: 2
      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    11. Re:I have an idea by ntropia · · Score: 4, Informative

      Name two.

      1. Martinovich I., Perito, D., et al.
      2. House, P., Greger, B.

      Notes:
      - these are only two papers that made it into the public media in recent times
      - it is a very conservative estimation to assume that each one of them involved the work of tens of peoples
      - it is also safe to assume that there are many others that are still "pushing the boundaries of Knowledge" on the matter but are not enough "media-chewable" so they never reach the notoriously sloppy AC's attention

    12. Re:I have an idea by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The state of actual medical research to fix conditions like his is in just as sorry of a state. Companies are too busy pouring cash into penis pills and weight loss drugs to spend R&D money on tailoring targeted DNA rejuvenation treatments. No, it's not just Sci-Fi, or rather it ought not to be, but assholes like you act like this is being feverishly worked on around the clock when in reality nobody is doing a GODDAMN THING.

      Two points: (1) Do you claim to have a solution that can be implemented? (2) What are YOU doing about curing the diseasse?

      I know it is fun to sit at home and bash medical R&D of focusing on weight-loss pills etc. But look at the statistics. About 5000 people in the US have ALS at any given time (and death rate is close to incidence rate of 2/100,000 per year: Citation). So in the US (300 million population) that is 6000 deaths a year. Do you know how many people die due to obesity? Automobile accidents? Heart disease? ALS doesn't even count compared to those: Rank of causes of death.

      Just so you know, I would love cures for a lot of diseases to be found (including ALS). But in the real world, companies focus on what makes business sense. Why should the NIH grants/Medical R&D focus on ALS when there are a lot more deaths due to other causes? Because one person who has it is famous? I'm sure there are a lot of smart/famous people (okay, may not be Stephen Hawking type of smart, but talented and contributing to society in other ways) who die of lots of other causes. We don't live entirely in a meritocracy that says Famous Guy's life is worth more than everyone else's and is therefore more deserving of resources.

    13. Re:I have an idea by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Instead of rehashing 1970s tech, could we PLEASE start understanding how the human body works and why some bodies destroy themselves in this way? It would be FAR cooler to have a molecule that goes in there and repairs this damage. Atoms arranged THEMSELVES into working nerves once, they can do it again.

      Is this too complex for us as a species? What happened to the "we choose to do these things not because they are easy, but because they are hard" spirit?

      Hey, we didn't know that was so important to you, or of course, we would've ''got 'er done'' for you already. So, all you need is a 'magic' atom, huh? I'll get right on that for you. Figure it'll get done by Tuesday for ya'.

    14. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but these people are describing the paint markings on the ICs inside a television without understanding the electronics behind them.

    15. Re:I have an idea by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Ah, modded down by the ignorant who know nothing about the neuro-protective role of endo-cannabinoids nor their directed role in neurogenesis.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    16. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a "magic" atom, please?

    17. Re:I have an idea by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Okay, 'Molecule' is the word the poster used. He wants a magic molecule or something that would magically fix problems in a human body. And he wants it yesterday. Modern medicine is good nowadays, but it's not 'that' good, yet. I want a flying car NOW already! Doesn't mean I'm getting what I want when I want it. That's all I was saying.

    18. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely it was modded down because it doesn't make any sense because you were high when you wrote it.

    19. Re:I have an idea by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      You got modded down I believe because you made the ridiculous assertion that there is already a cure for ALS-- legalizing marijuana! And that people just refuse to accept it. I assure you that if cannabis was the cure for ALS that so much money would not have been spent helping Hawking cope with ALS rather than just curing him.

      One might ask where exactly you got your PHD, and why you havent gotten a government grant yet.

    20. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this too complex for us as a species?

      Yes. At the moment it is. People are working on trying to understand it, but it is so incredibly complex, much more complex than the computer you are using to post to Slashdot or putting a man on the moon or even a 1-ton nuclear powered rover on Mars.

      What happened to the "we choose to do these things not because they are easy, but because they are hard" spirit?

      It seems the US as a nation lost that spirit many years ago, a few individuals still have, but individuals can only do so much.

    21. Re:I have an idea by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, the reason is because he doesn't want to use an EEG-based input.

    22. Re:I have an idea by zerotorr · · Score: 1

      Your're talking about what monkeys get and such, but i'm pretty sure what Stephen Hawking wants, Stephen Hawking gets. If it were possible currently, he would have it if he wanted it. Also, of course companies put money into what they can get out of it, penis pills and such, otherwise they wouldn't be companies! If you want something better, start lobbying your damn government to take it up and increase your taxes! Companies are for profit, because they are businesses need to repay their shareholders, otherwise no one will invest and they will stagnate. Government can increase R&D for non profitable research, but someone has to pay for that, and that will be you. And if you want to pay for it, then run for government or vote for someone who will make that happen.

    23. Re:I have an idea by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Why don't you get started on that little project in your spare time?

      I would suggest that you're looking at the problem incorrectly though. The atoms did not arrange themselves into nerves, etc, all by themselves. You've simply leaped past a couple of very critical things, like viable DNA donors, cooperating to create yet more healthy, viable DNA.

      Hell, if all that were required were a bunch of atoms, we could take hydrocarbons almost at random, throw them in a blender, and wait for a child to birth itself from the blender. Geeez, Louise.

      Before you ask - I have little idea what is the correct way to approach the problem. I'm no biologist, not a chemist, not a physicist. About all I can say for sure is, things are a good deal more complicated than your post suggests.

      Meanwhile, let's invest in nanotechnology. It seems that nano is actually starting to make progress in curing some of our (simpler) ills.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    24. Re:I have an idea by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I could make an argument that obesity is self induced. Auto accidents are mostly due to stupidity, in which one stupid person takes himself and a random number of victims out. Heart disease is often due to self induced obesity.

      GP may have a point, in that we should cure those diseases that are not self induced, before worrying about dumbasses who work hard to kill themselves. How much money went into all that penis hardening research, anyway? Every single dollar was a total waste. We don't NEED more old bastards running around trying to impregnate young women with old worn out sperms which are likely to produce retards. (And, in case you weren't aware of my age - I speak as an old bastard whose penis no longer stays rigid 24/7.)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    25. Re:I have an idea by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Truth always seems ridiculous to the ignorant.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    26. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The profit margin is smaller. There would be too much start up cost for too little immediate gain. A bio-science division would likely take at least a half decade to get some feet on the ground, and 15 years to get a decent prototype of a project.

    27. Re:I have an idea by Waccoon · · Score: 2

      What never ceases to amaze me is how we treat such brilliant people. I was surprised to hear how old his equipment is, how difficult it is to keep running, and how little his personal assistants are paid.

      I understand he is not a rich man and caretaking is naturally expensive, but I would have expected more goodwill sponsors to come forward, if only for publicity's sake.

    28. Re:I have an idea by ryen · · Score: 1

      Oh really? Can you elaborate please? And are you also pursuing bioscience research in the same spirit in which you balk?

    29. Re:I have an idea by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Ill agree with you, and look at my nick. There is much to be done in the medical world concerning marijuana. I believe it is a great medicine and has the potential to be a cure, or at least helpful for many diseases. but my hopes and thoughts are no replacement for medical research. Yes we have come a long way, and yes we can say for sure that marijuana does have medicinal value. but we are not in the clear just yet, there is a lot more to go.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    30. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hawking himself is very careful about the tech he uses. The man, quite understandably, does not want to lock himself into any form of communication that has a chance of vanishing with the vendor that operates it. If your keyboard is faulty, you go out and buy another. But if Hawking's keyboard is faulty, it is one of perhaps dozens like it in the world, serviced by a single manufacturer. Asking why Hawking uses the tech he does is like asking why Debian is so popular for servers. That's why this story is news, after all.

    31. Re:I have an idea by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      As does ignorance to the informed.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    32. Re:I have an idea by mrvan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you were a very smart fellow in the 1800's with nothing but the most rudimentary knowledge of electricity, how would you go about understanding something like a portable radio transistor?

      Would you have advised the people in the 1700's to just stop thinking about electricity because they lacked fundamental understanding of it? How would that have brought us to where we are now?

      Do you think it would be possible to understand the human brain without computers (the cognitive models but especially the computing power needed for modeling) and electronic microscopes? Do you think it would be possible to build computers and electronic microscopes without a deep understanding of electronics (among other things)? And do you think we could get a deep understanding of electronics without the first crude experimentation with naturally occurring and static electricity?

      Sure, someone that would write a paper now on how a radio works by reversing engineering the circuit board without understanding the first notions of electronics is an idiot and would be duly ridiculed in the literature. An "inventor" from the 1700's who did experiments with rubbing amber or flying kites into the storm was a genius, someone doing it now would be an amateur at best.

      tl;dr: context matters

    33. Re:I have an idea by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Remember when he was taking applications for an assistant a while back? One of the requirements was that the individual would be able to repair his tech on-the-spot. Not just replace a keyboard, but do a teardown and get it back up and running again. That's another pretty good reason for him to stick with the tech he's had around for years. They can train the new people as they come in, and you're not playing catchup with new tech.

    34. Re:I have an idea by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Could you please explain why one of the most brilliant men of all time is sitting in a 70's era wheel chair using a fucking joystick and his cheek to try and type words when we already have EEG-based headcaps that fucking MONKEYS can use to play goddamn video games?

      Because you're too busy wasting your life bitching about what hasn't been achieved by society while doing fuck all to sort it yourself. It's pretty pathetic so sort your shit out.

    35. Re:I have an idea by 19061969 · · Score: 1

      Hawking is fairly conservative with his tech. As another post said, working is the primary requirement, even if slow. Remember, a FUBARd system is no use no matter how cool or fast it worked in the lab.

      Besides, Hawking has a nice media career going for himself: http://youtu.be/tOimeRod4TY (yes, it really Hawking help sell financial products!).

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    36. Re:I have an idea by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Theres grant money to be had if you can show the truth of your words; that youre on slashdot rather than applying for it indicates that there is no substance behind them.

    37. Re:I have an idea by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      I could make an argument that obesity is self induced.

      That it is. It may be rooted in psychological causes both genetic, environmental and acquired, but it is (almost) never the result of someone else force-feeding you, so any and all motivation and incentive have to come from yours truly and nobody else.

      Oh, and coming down from semi-obesity isn't all that hard (unless you're in a hurry). In the past year I've come down from 150+ kg to 96 kg today over the course of 13 months doing nothing more than eating at least one healthy meal each day (usually a 500g mixed salad), and only one serving at the other meals. I still eat junk food now and then. I still drink sugar-filled sodas. I still eat candy and chocolate. I don't exercise more, although I do tend to walk more. So it is possible without weird diets or exercise from Hell.

      So I tend to say that failure to lose weight is caused only by the person itself. It doesn't take much change to do it so failing to do that is bordering on pathetic.

      I spoke to a doctor specializing in diets once, and he 'revealed' that losing weight is beyond simple: Just use more energy than you eat, i.e. eat less or exercise more. Do that and don't cheat and you will lose weight. Eat more smaller meals and your metabolism will increase, thus using energy faster. Avoid mixing carbon-hydrates (sugar etc.) and fat and you can eat either without it ending up getting stored.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    38. Re:I have an idea by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Could you please explain why one of the most brilliant men of all time is sitting in a 70's era wheel chair using a fucking joystick and his cheek to try and type words

      There are several reasons. One of the biggest reasons, which is also the reason space probes have seemingly antiquated computing power, is that it has to work. EEG-based headcaps for playing video games is great, but how good is the fidelity? How good does it do when you need to be able to use it 24/7? Face it: most consumer electronics is simply not robust enough nor reliable enough for this kind of application. There's a good reason you and everyone else calls it "shit that's damn near available at WalMart."

      A second reason is cost: the kinds of technology you are talking about it really f*&#ing expensive. Who will pay for the R&D to create it? Who will pay for it to purchase onesey-twosey? How many people do you know who are in his position, medically, yet have it means, financially? That "shit that's damn near available at WalMart" is cheap because it is mass produced for paying customers. If you want to help this man and those like him, figure out how to leverage the economies of scale that enable consumer technologies to be cheap and ubiquitous.

    39. Re:I have an idea by necro81 · · Score: 2

      There are plenty of companies that would quite willingly give him their tech and 24/7 customer support, gratis. Intel has been such a "sponsor" of Hawking for years. However, because this technology must work for him all the time, and because he can't spend his days trying to learn the latest new-fangled thing you want him to try, he himself is slow to adopt new technology. Having a computer freeze up is bad enough for most folks. For him it means he is stranded and speechless until someone checks in on him.

    40. Re:I have an idea by bobintetley · · Score: 2

      Two points.

      1. 1. Stephen Hawking is British. We in the UK have a healthcare system that doesn't bankrupt people unlucky enough to have degenerative and terminal illnesses. Obamacare is irrelevant, but on that note you're a fool if you think any steps towards social healthcare are a bad idea and that the US' current mercenary healthcare system is good for anyone but insurance companies.
      2. 2. If you and the dimwitted GP could think of repurposing available tech, why do you assume that engineers at one of the biggest, smartest tech companies in the world couldn't?
    41. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Viagra was originally researched as a way to make a drug that could generally increase blood pressure. They did however find a few "side effects" and decided to market that to make even more money than they would have otherwise.

      However, erectile dysfunction is no laughing matter, especially since it's not only "old bastards" who get it. It can seriously contribute to psychological problems and depression, witch will cause those affected to be generally less productive in society, leading to larger health care costs and unemployment rates.

      An erect country is a happier country.

    42. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be a rather awful situation if something goes wrong with the input or speech generation.
      If it does he's not even capable of telling anyone that it has broken.
      Imagen if something breaks, but he has not been speaking for a while, and does not notice, and suddenly, a situation arises that means he has to communicate something, but finds himself unable to.

      Unless he could use both his old system and a new system at the same time, to learn the new while still being able to use the old one, I fully understand that he does not want to change what has been working reliably for many years.

      Also, the voice-box is his voice, his identity, and there are only two of them with the exact right parameters in existence, and there seem to be no one who can reproduce it accurately. It will be a cold day in hell before he gives up that voice-box.

    43. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, I'm very possibly wrong (correct me if I am), but isn't Stephen Hawking fairly well off? I mean, I somehow doubt that he has to get his food bought from discount-meats-R-us.

      If he wanted a thought-controlled exoskeleton, I'm pretty sure that he could:
      a) front the money for all of the R&D and materials
      b) Create a kickstarter or other donation-based thing to fund all of A.

      Now as you said, there's thousands of people that die from this, and I'm sure the absolute vast majority wouldn't have the money to fund this... but here we have an assumingly rich guy, or at the bare minimum a guy with an absolute truckload of support and fans that could generate money, with both the means and the reason to push this R&D.

      Why isn't he?

    44. Re:I have an idea by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Apparently you have no clue what is required to get a grant, let alone a licence to, conduct research on cannabis in canada. It's actually easier in the states, ironic since they're the worldwide cause of the illegality of cannabis. Anyways, even if you get a licence you either get schwag sprayed with thc from the US government, or a new canadian synthetic blend of thc and some other compounds. Either way, you lose out on the complex interactions between thc, cbds, cbns. If you weren't in the know, CBD's are responsible for most of the medical benefits, including neurogenesis and neuroprotectivity, of cannabis. When the government removes the CBD's when you want to test medical benefits...

      If you think all you need is truth to conduct cannabis research, I wish I could live in the same world you do.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    45. Re:I have an idea by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      As an anecdotal aside. I have used it to treat arthritis, restore my eyesight, and restore movement to nerve damaged areas (degenerative nerve disorders run in my family). However, like I said, it requires directed awareness. You can't rewire something without knowing where to run the wire or where to connect it to.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    46. Re:I have an idea by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      Seriously man, quit making excuses. Biomedical technology for the disabled is at least 30 years behind CONSUMER technology and at least 50 years behind where it should be.

      Designing general-purpose silicon-based microelectronics technology from the ground up is vastly easier (and currently, vastly more profitable) than deducing the function of an organic, naturally evolved, and vastly more sophisticated neural system. The fact that you would make such a comparison proves that you don't know a fucking thing about either. Try spending a decade doing biomedical research and then let us know how easy you think thought-controlled electronics should be.

    47. Re:I have an idea by the+gnat · · Score: 2

      But in the real world, companies focus on what makes business sense. Why should the NIH grants/Medical R&D focus on ALS when there are a lot more deaths due to other causes?

      Actually, a lot of the basic biomedical and technological groundwork that would be required to treat a condition like ALS using the science-fiction fantasies of the GP would be immensely profitable. If we could really understand how stimuli get in and out of the brain, and come up with neural-computer interfaces that not only restore full mobility to the patients, but allow direct control of computers, the potential applications far exceed treatment of ALS. Most psychiatric disorders would start to become treatable at their root causes (instead of the incredibly crude symptom-based treatment we use today), along with other neurodegenerative disorders, which are already a huge market and will only become more so as we accumulate elderly Western patients. But that's just a start; if we could wire human brains directly to computers, we could vastly increase our productivity, decrease our communications latency, and start to re-define what it means to become human. (It would also have military applications, which is why DARPA is now interested too.) The fact that we haven't done so yet isn't an indication that we're lazy, or that our priorities are misplaced - it just means that human neurobiology is an extraordinarily difficult subject. It really doesn't help when your primary research organism is sentient and has a 20-year-plus reproductive cycle.

      Seriously, the entire field of neurobiology is essentially dedicated to figuring out the answers to these kind of questions, and there are thousands of researchers trying to understand neurodegenerative disorders. Everyone would be thrilled if it were as easy as the AC suggests.

    48. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because bio-medical research is so little compared facial-expression-to-language-recognition software research....

          It's just not worth the money. You want breakthrough discoveries in highly unpredictable fields of research ? Stop cutting government funding to fundamental research.

  4. Yay! by Shemmie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He'll be able to do even more awful TV adverts for crappy insurance companies!

    1. Re:Yay! by lattyware · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Isn't it a little awesome that he has become a (general) idol? I mean, everyone cries out that the current celebrity culture is terrible, and yet here we have a man who is everything everyone should aspire to, despite terrible adversity, and he is in popular TV shows, doing adverts. Isn't that a good thing? I am glad that we are moving on and people who in the past would only be icons for the geeky, or those in the field can become icons for everyone, because it means we are focusing on better things in people.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    2. Re:Yay! by Shemmie · · Score: 1

      On the level you're coming at it from, it's wonderful.

      I hope it's taken that way. I hope people laugh at the joke...

    3. Re:Yay! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      If he wasn't crippled, he wouldn't be an idol.

      Sad but true.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Yay! by MartinSchou · · Score: 2

      He might not be AS much of an idol, but he'd still be as big an idol as say Neil deGrasse Tyson, Brian Cox or Phil Plait.

    5. Re:Yay! by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      That's actually a brilliant ad.

      Easily the best ad I've seen in ages, as it really takes the piss out of the company's own ads.

    6. Re:Yay! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I guess his scientific output would be more but his notoriety would be less.

    7. Re:Yay! by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      > If he wasn't crippled, he wouldn't be an idol.

      I respectfully disagree, at least in part. Sure, the public admires him because he absolutely refuses to give up, in spite of disease that would have made most people surrender long before now. I respect him for that.

      But to be fair, Hawking had already made a name for himself long before he landed in that wheelchair -- starting with the Adams Prize for his doctoral thesis (back in 1966). He's not just winging it or banking on public sympathy. He and Roger Penrose first established mathematically that time was a property of this universe -- that "time" as we know it didn't/doesn't exist outside of this universe.

      We lay-creatures tend to think only in terms of Nobel Prizes. No, Hawking has never won one. But there are plenty of other honors that, amongst physicists, carry just as much weight (if not more). Most of them you've never heard of.

      If you want another great example of an absolutely outstanding physicist who has never won a Nobel, it would be Freeman Dyson. He is just as well-regarded as Hawking, and has never been near a wheelchair.

      I think you (and some of the other complainers here) are way off base on this one.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    8. Re:Yay! by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      Problem is though that it's the fifth (or sixth? I lost count) in a series that have been doing just that - and it's getting tedious now

      It may even be time to get rid of my opera-singing namesake as their main character while they're at it, and come up with a new pitch...

    9. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he wasn't crippled, he wouldn't be an idol.

      Sad but true.

      Well, wrong. Einstein was not a cripple, but he was an idol anyway. The wheelchair probably gets him a bit of extra attention, but being the top theoretical physicist, uncovering secrets about space and time - that gets you some attention anyway.

  5. But... by ilsaloving · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's all well and good, but what will happen when Hawking dictates a formula that involves division?

  6. Hook him to the NSA's supercomputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Come on IBM, why don't you hook him up to the neural interface and the supercomputer you built to run the platform????

    Oh right...sorry...we all need to keep quiet that your neural research is coming from an unlawful human experiementation program.

    Dicks.

    1. Re:Hook him to the NSA's supercomputer by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      Or they could get Hawking one of these. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotiv_Systems A brain computer interface that is available to consumers already. With it they could give him a means of communication even if he loose what little control of his body he has left

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:Hook him to the NSA's supercomputer by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      They could definitely get one of those for you. You could hook it up to your spell checker, and it would hopefully figure out that when you write 'loose', you really mean 'loses'. :)

    3. Re:Hook him to the NSA's supercomputer by rikkards · · Score: 1

      You could hook it up to your Grammar checker

      FTFY

    4. Re:Hook him to the NSA's supercomputer by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      No, people say the right thing. I've never heard anyone verbally confuse lose and loose. They just fail to transcribe it correct. Hence, it's a spelling mistake.

    5. Re:Hook him to the NSA's supercomputer by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      *correctly

  7. it's pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's pity that person that have so many interesting things to say can't communicate normally with other peoples.

    There are a lot of people that speak a lot and doesn't have anything interesting to say.

  8. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that brain to computer tech be useful in Stephen Hawking case? If they can use it to move a robotic arm why not word selection software?

  9. Time to use some of the brainwave interfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those just might actually do a good job as he should be generating rather detailed patterns.

  10. Good for intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, they are embracing overclocking.

  11. Idol - no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you give people too much credit. HE's a train wreck and people like seeing the truly gifted among us cut down.

  12. It will work just fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as long as it isn't based on windows.

  13. And by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they loading the urban dictionary?

  14. Engineers are problem solvers by servognome · · Score: 1, Informative

    After meeting with Hawking, Rattner said he wondered whether his company’s processor technology could restore the scientist’s ability to communicate at five words per minute, or even increase that rate to 10.

    A business person would probably have left and said, "boring conversation anyway"

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  15. Eye Tracking by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A quick Youtube search turns up this example of eye-tracking tech for character input. Yeah, it doesn't look to be much faster than Intel's proposed 10 words per minute but that clip is 5 years old and I'm sure it could be improved upon in a number of ways (instead of having to 'hover' over a key for couple seconds for it to confirm, maybe a twitch could be used instead).

    Only the other day we saw a demonstration of eye tracking being used with the Windows 8 interface. Something like that would allow him to browse the web, email, take notes, etc.

    1. Re:Eye Tracking by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

      Oh, and add decent predictive text like modern smartphone soft-keyboards have too. I think I remember reading that his current system has some form of predictive text but I'm guessing it's pretty dated.

    2. Re:Eye Tracking by vuo · · Score: 1

      There is also the option of using Dasher. You only need four controls: up, down and forward and back. The program shows a tree of the possible options, emphasizing more frequent words. You can write "the" by just looking at "t" and then at the "h e" that appear. This is pretty intuitive with eye-tracking, more so than a keyboard.

    3. Re:Eye Tracking by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Something like that would allow him to browse the web, email, take notes, etc.

      For the love of god, keep Hawking off the web. It seems we have one great mind left that's exploring how the world works, and you want to sidetrack him with lolcats?!?!

      Yes, I'm joking.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:Eye Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think Swype for Kinect :-)

  16. Big corporate helping handicapped man? by FreeTherapy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Intel is not evil after all!

    Now I will buy all their shit.

    1. Re:Big corporate helping handicapped man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all we know...

      Stephen Hawking diagnosed - 1963
      Intel founded - 1968

      Seems unlikely.

    2. Re:Big corporate helping handicapped man? by rwise2112 · · Score: 2

      For all we know...

      Stephen Hawking diagnosed - 1963 Intel founded - 1968

      Seems unlikely.

      But not impossible. Sounds like an Intel floating point error.

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    3. Re:Big corporate helping handicapped man? by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      They just dumped those chemicals very quickly.

  17. Tennyson - Ulysses by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tho' much is taken, much abides; and though
    We are not now that strength which in old days
    Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
    One equal temper of heroic hearts,
    Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
    To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

    It is not enough to have the ability to change the world. It is a rare combination of chance and circumstance, far more than any particular genius. Archimedes could not have formulated the questions that led to quantum electrodynamics. Nor is it fair to select a particular point of inflection out of a continuum of progress -- which discovery since the invention of the transistor is responsible for the processor in your computer?

    You judge beyond your ken, and far above your station. I hope that you are ashamed of your comment, but console myself that it will likely receive all the attention that it deserves.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    1. Re:Tennyson - Ulysses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not the parent, but I think you misunderstand the concept of poetry. You need individual examples to be inspiring. A poem about the faceless masses of scientist wouldn't be very inspiring to most people.

      (Captcha: "brooding")

    2. Re:Tennyson - Ulysses by drakaan · · Score: 1

      A poem about the faceless masses of scientists might be inspiring...if written by a talented poet...which was kinda what the person you were replying to was saying about Hawking's ability to communicate ideas and formulate questions. Sheesh.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  18. We all know where this is headed... by RedHackTea · · Score: 1
    --
    The G
  19. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please tell me you are joking. The reason why I advocate more people buy AMD is because frankly X86 has gotten so incredibly powerful on BOTH sides of the aisle that I think its more important to have competition than to win some benchmark and the difference is like going from insaneo speed to ludicrous speed.

    I mean look at some of the chips both have been putting out, even 7 years ago you would have had to spend just insane amounts of money to get anywhere near this performance and now you can get these sub 20w CPUs with multiple cores and GPUs that do full 1080p? Honestly people really need to take a moment to just stop and appreciate how fucking GOOD we have it right now. Hell even the Atom chip when paired with ION made for a pretty decent HTPC that used less power than a first gen P4 doing nothing, now Intel puts out these chips that just get totally incredible amounts of IPC and at an average of only 55w? That is just crazy, hell my Pentium D used more than that just sitting on the fricking desktop doing nothing.

    So I would say if anything the slowdown in PC sales and the reason i recommend AMD is because Intel upped the game so damned high that even a low end chip is like a top fuel funny car and just blows through any job your average user can come up with without breaking a sweat. If Intel wouldn't have kept raising the bar with the tick tock cycle I wouldn't be able to buy 6 core CPUs for just $100 or get my customers damned nice laptops for less than $500 delivered.

    The amount of power we get today just blows my mind and if you would have told me a decade ago I'd be typing on a website while listening to music, burning a DVD and doing a transcode and NOTHING would lag? Yeah I'd tell you to go back to your Star trek fanfic but here we are, where even the lowest laptop can do 1080P and multitask like crazy and our desktops are just monsters. I predict in 3 years, maybe less, we'll see ARM peter out as they aren't able to scale the IPC while Intel will just scale down a Core2 to where it uses like 2w max and runs rings around the ARM, it'll be like having a supercomputer in your pocket, just incredible.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  20. Re:Brain on a stick by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    Hawking was the first to make a cosmological model by unifying general relativety and quantum mechanics. That's not easy, Einstein couldn't do it.

  21. If nothing else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If nothing else, designing better communication interfaces to people like Stephen Hawking, will give better communication interfaces to everyone else who is in a position like Stephen Hawking. Neural interfaces where you just think the word and it appears on screen or sounds as speech. You might be trapped in your body, but there is no reason why you can't still communicate with the outside world, and no reason why they can't communicate with you.

  22. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by stooo · · Score: 1

    Yes, the x86 tech has improved a lot.
    However, the intel presentation at CES was empty. They presented a facelift of the same chip with stuff limited, and made false claims on it.
    The competition (x86 or not) is not sleeping like that. intel needs to wake up if they want to survive.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  23. Re:Brain on a stick by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    M-theory?

    Give me a break. It fails tests of Godel - and is based on a mathematical supposition of unobservable, multiple dimensions. It's like adding new axes to a graph - to fit non-conforming data into a pre-determined hypothesis.

    It is a sophomoric proposition illuminated by calculative sophistication. Wittgenstein, were he alive, would have ripped Hawking seven new assholes, and been mathematically correct in his exposition.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  24. no disrespect to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No disrespect to Stephen Hawking. His a brilliant man, who has overcome lot in his life-time against the odds.

    But for some reason this movie quote comes to mind... :)
    Donkey: Hi, Princess!
    Princess Fiona: It talks!
    Shrek: Yeah, it's getting him to shut up that's the trick!

  25. Re:Brain on a stick by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    And I shall be epigrammatic: "M-Theory is a tautology".

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  26. Re:Brain on a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one word a min is not fast enough for an epic rap battle.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn7-fVtT16k

    Sorry not sure how to do a hyper link

  27. That's great, but... by proca · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they can increase Hawking's speech rate by an order of magnitude, but that's a lot of work to accommodate people like Hawking: those with ALS that live more than 10 years. I think only 1% of ALS patients live past 10 years. Hawking has lived 50+ years with ALS, which makes him an incredibly rare case.

  28. Samsung swype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I used the Swype keyboard on a Samsung phone for the first time the other day (English is not my main language on the thing). Pretty stunning. I'm also amazed by how good text to speech has become (same phone). I'm sure newer versions have improved on this in the last year too. All that remains is to replace the touch-sensitive screen with some eye tracking tech (or similar, if he can't move his gaze any more), but that's been done yonks ago aready.

    just saying.

  29. Cure for cancer by phorm · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the cancer cure for (much of) cancer. This one was even on The news

  30. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by LRAD · · Score: 1

    I agree with your views. A cheap, low wattage AMD chip is plenty fast and makes modern OS's go fast. Problem is Intel's stuff is at LEAST a little better, cheaper and lower wattage. If you can save money with an AMD chip, invest in an SSD as well. As far as I'm concerned that is going to make a desktop snappy almost regardless of (modern) processor. If you haven't used one before you don't know how slowly you've been using your system even if you have a top end Intel.

  31. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you check Stephen Hawking's website:

    "... I have also experimented with Brain Controlled Interfaces to communicate with my computer however as yet these don't work as consistently as my cheek operated switch. ... "

  32. AC because it's easy, and not hard ;-) ? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Somewhat ironic you choose to post a provocative style message as AC. Did you choose to do so because it was easy, and not hard? ;-)
    Re: "could we please start understanding how the human body works" - I think you'll find that there are many research institutions and universities carrying out a lot of biological research. Why don't answers appear quickly? Because it's hard. A good friend has just finished his PhD studying Huntingdon's disease, he has made some valuable but incremental progress to solving genetic problems in this area. This stuff is really tough to solve...

  33. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by Crosshair84 · · Score: 1

    Exactly, you got me interested in the E series chips, before I was 100% intel, because that was what we used at the office and I just grabbed the old stuff. Now I have an E-450, two E-350s, and two C-60's. (People tend to hate on the C60, but it works well within its limits.) Only problem is that I tend to buy used off eBay and the AMD section is often limited.

  34. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Yes, the x86 tech has improved a lot. However, the intel presentation at CES was empty. They presented a facelift of the same chip with stuff limited, and made false claims on it. The competition (x86 or not) is not sleeping like that. intel needs to wake up if they want to survive.

    Have you been smoking what Charlie Demerjian is selling? Intel has a huge lead over their closest competitor, AMD. Since AMD resigned its-self to the value market a few years ago they have not even attempted to take a shot at leading. Intel has no immediate threats, unfortunately.

  35. Could you imagine? by cephus440 · · Score: 0

    "I... have... to... go... to... the... bbbbbathro...." "ahhh... nevermind"

  36. Re:Brain on a stick by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    all of the commonly used and useful quantum models also do exactly those things

  37. Re:Brain on a stick by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    all systems of mathematics are

  38. Re:Brain on a stick by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Which is why they are false.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  39. Re:Cool by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

    C'mon!

    He's GREAT on that Futurama show! Almost as funny as Nixon's head, or that degenerate robot... Al Gore.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  40. Re:Brain on a stick by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    "false" is not the issue, that is from the realm of philosophy and of no import. a scientific model is USEFUL for predicting behaviour of natural phenomenon or it is NOT USEFUL. there are several quantum mechanical models that are very useful. you are presently using devices engineered with useful quantum mechanical models. scientific experiment has shown other quantum mechanical models to be useful.

    Interestingly, there have been recent astronomic observations in the realm of the intersection of quantum mechanics and GR, and more to come. We will soon see if Hawkings model is USEFUL or not

  41. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's competition. One company made a better processor and the other lost the race. It's how the world works. Nothing is "FAIR"..
    Stop whining...

  42. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    The reason I don't advocate Intel, well besides the douchebag compiler rigging and bribery they should have gotten an anti-trust bust for, is that they cripple their chips and moreover they cripple them WRONG. I mean cutting out POWERSAVING features on the lower end chips? Really? You have cache and HT and VM support you can cut, that isn't enough but you gotta make them laptop chips into pigs when you have so many other ways to upsell?

    And I have to completely disagree that Intel chips are cheaper and lower wattage, not only because they tend to cripple powersaving on their lower end chips but also because on the low end you can get insane amounts of power from AMD cheap. I mean I can get an Athlon Triple kit for $195 just add HDD and a fricking Phenom II Hexacore for just $210 just add HDD and burner. When you figure in the cost to finish those kits up I can have a completed product for less than an Intel i3 CPU, board and RAM, which would leave me with half the parts left to buy!

    And finally I again have to disagree when it comes to SSDs because until they fix the hot/crazy scale when it comes to SSDs I simply can't recommend them except for certain niches like a mobile device that isn't gonna have mission critical data on it, and that article may be a couple years old but if anything I've found that since going up to triple cells the problem has gotten worse. I have several gamer customers that buy top o' the line and they are up to double digits when it comes to SSDs because of all the failures, and we ain't talking OCZ, we are talking Intel, Kingston, and Samsung. In a way it reminds me of the first days of HDDs and how insanely high those early drive failure rates were and of course once it fails you can't wipe the drive so many of my customers are leery of even claiming on their warranty because they have no idea what kind of third world center those drives will be sent to and if they will be risking ID theft thanks to all the data on the now dead SSD.

    The funny part is its NOT the cells that are failing as you'd think, nope its the ARM controllers they have on the drives themselves. When that thing fails, which it ALWAYS does with no warning at all, you can't even get your data off because it won't even show up in BIOS. Now once they get THAT fixed? Behind you 100% although I have to wonder how much gain myself and most of my users will see since most just use sleep mode anyway and with Win 7 intelligent caching most of their programs are already loaded into RAM but in its current state frankly SSDs are even worse than Seagate drives over 600Gb when it comes to the number just shitting themselves.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  43. Re:the most interesting tech intel puts out these by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    I don't know why anybody would hate on the C60, its frankly a kick ass netbook or mini-PC chip and when I couldn't find an E350 for my dad's GF year before last I found him an Acer with a C60 to give her and she just loves the hell out of the thing, like with my E350 EEE she has no intention of getting rid of it and why should she? Unlike the crippled Atom systems the C and E series support a ton of RAM (she has 4GB on hers, I went ahead and slapped 8GB in my E350) and have full VM support as well as does 1080P over HDMI. She loves hers because the C series gets even better battery life than mine, after 2 years she still gets nearly 6 hours whereas after 3 years mine still gets a solid 4. But I'm glad to see you enjoy the Bobcats, I can't count the number of office PCs and HTPCs I've built with Bobcats and they are just great, low power, full 1080P, hell I play L4D and the Portal and Torchlight series on my netbook when stuck at the doctor's office and its a fricking blast.

    BTW Crosshair one place to keep an eye out besides Craigslist and eBay is to check out Cowboom which will have some insanely cheap AMD units from time to time. If you have never heard of them its the site Best Buy uses to sell all their returned and refurbed as well as trade in units and as you can see while they have a ton of dirt cheap Atoms they do get some AMD netbooks as well as the occasional full size. I picked up an Atom dual for $85 there that was like new, boy that was an easy unit to turn, as well as a C50 Gateway that was only $129 and also easy to flip. Its one of those sites you really just have to check daily as they constantly get new stuff and you never know what is gonna be there. The only AMDs they have now is a couple of single cores at $165 but last week they had a really nice E450 for just $130, you just gotta keep an eye out.

    Oh and also keep an eye out on Amazon because as you can see here you can get some insanely cheap AMD E series boards there, I mean $70 for the Gigabyte with 4 SATA, or $95 for the Asrock with a PCI-E slot? way too cheap. If you are building an office PC I recommend the cheaper Gigabyte but for an HTPC you can't go wrong with the Asrock as hybrid crossfire works pretty damned good on those E series and having dedicated VRAM makes for a sweet HTPC, but as I'm sure you know both do 1080P just fine as long as you don't cheap out and buy 1066 RAM, I found running 1333 does make a difference on those APUs.

    And if you do have an HTPC you ought to email me and I'll send you the links to the free programs I use, i tripped over some killer freeware that loads all the Metadata from IMDB into your media library so when you fire up WMC it has all the box art and synopsis filled in, hell of a lot nicer than trying to just find things alphabetically and since it loads all the metadata you can sort by genre, year, title, its a great way to enjoy your movies and TV shows.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  44. Re:Brain on a stick by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Galactic distribution discoveries are demolishing the usefulness of these hypothesis, like the fossil record smashing Old Testament "history".

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."