Slashdot Mirror


John E. Karlin, Who Led the Way To All-Digit Dialing, Dies At 94

First time accepted submitter g01d4 writes "Who was John E. Karlin? 'He was the one who introduced the notion that behavioral sciences could answer some questions about telephone design,' according to Ed Israelski, an engineer who worked under Mr. Karlin at Bell Labs in the 1970s. And you thought Steve Jobs was cool. An interesting obituary in the NYT."

120 comments

  1. upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want to know if they are his fault. It's annoying to have phones different from everything else that has a keypad.

    1. Re:upside down keypads? by stevedog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apparently he did. From TFA... "The rectangular design of the keypad, the shape of its buttons and the position of the numbers — with “1-2-3” on the top row instead of the bottom, as on a calculator — all sprang from empirical research conducted or overseen by Mr. Karlin."

    2. Re:upside down keypads? by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Supposedly it is calculator keyboards that are upside down. Two reasons touch tone phones use the order they do:

      Touch tone phones replaced rotary phones, which already had 123 at the top of the dial, and 789 at the bottom. So it made sense to keep the same order that millions of people were already used to, in order to make the transition easier.

      Touch tone phones have the alphabet sharing the keys, starting with ABC on key 2. Thus the letters are alphabetic from top to bottom, which also properly follows reading order.

      Apparently no real research was done in the choice of calculator keyboards having the numbers descending from 9 down. It just happened, and since calculator keyboard layout was more arbitrary (it had neither a predecessor like touch tone phones, nor the alphabet sharing the keys), it would have made sense for calculator designers to match the touch tone phone layout.

      I don't know if any studies have been done, but I don't see any reason why one layout would be more intuitive than the other for pure numerical use to a human than the other. It's whatever you get used to. If calculators matched telephones from the beginning then today no one would feel something was inherently wrong with their calculator or that it is upside down from what it should have always been.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    3. Re:upside down keypads? by trb · · Score: 1

      Yes, the upside down keypads are his "fault." The obit has the info wrong. Adding machine keypads always had the lower numbers at the bottom, and so do computer keypads. You can google for about this, but I think he figured that American phone users (who mostly weren't adding machine users) were used to reading from left to right and top to bottom, hence the order.

    4. Re:upside down keypads? by hpa · · Score: 2

      The fail was that the analysis was done in a time when calculating machines were a speciality item few people were familiar with. 15 years later, they were not. It is worth nothing that some countries went with the AT&T scheme and others stayed with the 7-8-9 layout on their phones. Unfortunately the proliferation of letters on keypads (a lot of countries did not have them) in recent years have made 1-2-3 more prevalent.

    5. Re:upside down keypads? by stevedog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Although it wasn't based on research, it actually is fairly intuitive. Given that calculators were probably most commonly used in finance initially, I would guess that the most common number used (possibly even now) would be 0. Placing that most common number at the thumb position has clear utility, similar to that of the spacebar. My guess is that that served as the anchor, with the other numbers logically flowing from there.

      Obviously, all of this is coming out of my ass, but like I said, I don't think it's entirely illogical (though I also think that, for its own purpose, the phone's layout is equally logical, and emulating the calculator on a dialpad would have made the phone look ridiculous when it was released).

    6. Re:upside down keypads? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, the 1-2-3 on the top appears to be due to an R. L. Deininger, and probably some Bell execs who figured (npi) that it would look better with ABC at the top instead of PRS.

      What Mr. Deininger didn't realize was that the industries that already used keypads with higher numbers at the top weren't likely to change.

      Calculators started out with 900, 90 and 9 at the top, and going down to 0 at the bottom. Later digital calculators continued with the high numbers at the top, because that's what calculators (the human ones) were used to. So 7-8-9 went at the top.

      Similar for cash registers, which really were just narrow purpose calculators, but here there was also a mechanical reason. Registers popped up plaques with the numbers for the customer to see. The designs varied, but generally these were slotted in order from 0-9, with the 0 and 1 closest to the customer, to prevent fraud where the customer would see (and pay) a higher sum that what was entered. Having the low numbers at the bottom meant fewer mechanical crossings.

      Then there's the elevator industry. Buildings in general go upwards, not downwards, and placing the top floors, i.e. high numbers at the top was natural.

      So there were at least three examples of higher numbers at the top which Bell ignored.

      What bothers me is that ATMs also appear to have 1-2-3 at the top. I cannot get this to make any kind of sense, as they're used to enter sums, not mnemonics.
      Did AT&T perhaps "help" design early ATMs?

    7. Re:upside down keypads? by stevedog · · Score: 1

      It says "Putting “1-2-3” on the pad’s top row instead of the bottom (the configuration used, then as now, on adding machines and calculators) was also born of Mr. Karlin’s group: they found it made for more accurate dialing." I think when they said "the configuration used" they were referring to "the bottom" rather than the entire preceding phrase. Admittedly though, whatever they meant, it wasn't very clear.

    8. Re:upside down keypads? by arth1 · · Score: 0

      The fail was that the analysis was done in a time when calculating machines were a speciality item few people were familiar with.

      I would think that a sizable part of the population had operated a cash register or elevator, even in 1960.

    9. Re:upside down keypads? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The system with higher numbers on top goes back to the Roman and Chinese abacus, so it's not arbitrary at all.

      Also, push button elevators naturally had the higher floors higher up, so there was precedence for this system with push buttons.

    10. Re:upside down keypads? by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Never really noticed before, but you're right about ATM machines. The millions of POS terminals out there also match telephone keypads with 123 at the top. Guess it makes a little sense. You would enter your PIN into your phone when checking balance via a call to automated support, but you wouldn't ever type your PIN into a calculator. So at least you will always be entering your PIN on the same style keyboard (not counting computer keyboard numeric pads, but I really don't think the average person enters enough numbers to even bother using the numeric keypad on a computer - it would be interesting to see a study showing if the typical person even uses it at all).

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    11. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calculators did have a predecessor - mechanical adding machines and cash registers.
      In both cases, they had more than a '0' at the bottom, they often had the decimal point and a '00' and '000' button to allow faster keying of dollar amounts both for whole dollars and thousands of dollars.

    12. Re:upside down keypads? by NixieBunny · · Score: 5, Informative

      Elevators and cash registers did not have 7-8-9 keypads in 1960. Cash registers had 10 keys per digit, and elevators have always had one button per floor.

      The only type of machine that had a 7-8-9 keypad was the ten-key machine, used by bookkeepers and accountants to total receipts.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    13. Re: upside down keypads? by Sandman619 · · Score: 1

      Unlike a calculator which could begin at the top or bottom of the 10-key, the telephone has to have 1 at the top left, because we read left to right & top to bottom. Add in the alphabet which likewise needs to begin with A at the top left. Logically, when we associate numbers to letters, A is first, ie 1, and the rest of the alphabet follows in numerical order. So there is no logical way for the telephone keypad to be arranged Cheers !

      --
      Cheers !
    14. Re:upside down keypads? by Kotoku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that other cultures have done something may set a precedent but it does not make it any less arbitrary. To make something less arbitrary it has to have meaningful justification.

    15. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never really noticed before, but you're right about ATM machines

      What's an ATM machine? Is it a place where you use your PIN number?

    16. Re:upside down keypads? by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Supposedly it is calculator keyboards that are upside down. Two reasons touch tone phones use the order they do:

      Touch tone phones replaced rotary phones, which already had 123 at the top of the dial, and 789 at the bottom. So it made sense to keep the same order that millions of people were already used to, in order to make the transition easier.

      Touch tone phones have the alphabet sharing the keys, starting with ABC on key 2. Thus the letters are alphabetic from top to bottom, which also properly follows reading order.

      Apparently no real research was done in the choice of calculator keyboards having the numbers descending from 9 down. It just happened, and since calculator keyboard layout was more arbitrary (it had neither a predecessor like touch tone phones, nor the alphabet sharing the keys), it would have made sense for calculator designers to match the touch tone phone layout.

      I don't know if any studies have been done, but I don't see any reason why one layout would be more intuitive than the other for pure numerical use to a human than the other. It's whatever you get used to. If calculators matched telephones from the beginning then today no one would feel something was inherently wrong with their calculator or that it is upside down from what it should have always been.

      Sorta, kinda accurate.

      The main reason actually relates to the position of the zero. On a rotary phone, the numbers go 7-8-9-0 (phone phreaks should know that dialing 0 generates 10 pulses - just like 1-9 generate 1-9 pulses, respectively).

      On an adding machine and other such hardware, the zero is actually beside the 1-2-3. As at the time the numbers were in a vertical column, you'd see them as 0-1-2-3 ... -8-9.

      So when they went to the key pad, the phone engineers decided that since the 0 was besides the 9 on every phone they made, it should stay close to the 9 on the final phone layout. Hence 1-2-3 on top, 7-8-9 on the bottom, and *-0-# on the bottom. (Or on old keypads, 0 aligned with either the 8 or 9).

      LIkewise, calculator engineers saw that people who used adding machines expect the 0 to be near the 1-2-3, so they designed their keypads with that in mind as adding machine users expected 0 to be near 1.

      And look at your keyboard to this day - the number row reflects the telephone layout (1-2-3 ... -7-8-9-0) while the numeric keypad reflects the calculator layout. Presumably, this was because the typewriter guys saw that the telephone kept the 0 near the 9 so they kept their 0 near the 9 as well (being that more people would've seen a phone at the time than a calculator. I'm certain back in the late 19th century when keyboards weren't standardized on QWERTY and the phone was for rich folks, they probably had 0-1-2-3 just as often as 1-2-3..-9-0.

    17. Re:upside down keypads? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you telling me that the Romans and the Chinese are responsible for big-endian ordering?

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    18. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATM Machines use both orderings. Some place 123 on top and some place it upside down. Which means that you have to actually look at the keypad when you go to key in your PIN number.

    19. Re: upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, the solution to that is that we just assign the letters to different keys. Realize that the reason why phone numbers spell out interesting things is in most case the result of choosing the number the resolves to the words you want, not the other way around.

    20. Re:upside down keypads? by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

      You have an unbalanced parenthesis. You will be terminated shortly. Resistance is futile.

    21. Re:upside down keypads? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Last line of the article, apt on many levels:

      “How does it feel,” his inquisitor asked, “to be the most hated man in America?”

      In fairness to Mr. Karlin, he figured out what "ordinary people" could handle, and the target of "ordinary person" has moved.

    22. Re:upside down keypads? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Touch tone phones have the alphabet sharing the keys, starting with ABC on key 2. Thus the letters are alphabetic from top to bottom, which also properly follows reading order.

      Touch tone phones were only following the pattern already long established by rotary phones - those had the same letters associated with the same digits.

      As a matter of fact, when I was a kid our phone numbers were usually stated with the first two digits being replaced by letters - so you might've said "my number is LE5-4192" for instance. That first bit indicated which exchange you were on, and was probably a hold-over from when operators had to manually make the connections.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    23. Re:upside down keypads? by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      ..., but I really don't think the average person enters enough numbers to even bother using the numeric keypad on a computer - it would be interesting to see a study showing if the typical person even uses it at all).

      People do in countries that use AZERTY, because on AZERTY keyboards you have to use shift or caps lock to access the digits in the top row. Much easier to use the numeric keypad.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    24. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not in Shanghai - the ATM keypad at the airport terminal has 789 at the top, like a computer keyboard. Couldn't understand at first why it kept saying "wrong PIN number". Got it on the third attempt (luckily!)

    25. Re:upside down keypads? by BlackThorne_DK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Denmark they actually reversed it a few years back, with all the horrors of people not remembering or mistyped their PIN number.
      Before it was in the Calculator style, with 789 at the top, now all terminals are with 123 at the top, phone style...

    26. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that is so funny I can not believe nobody has made that observation before!

    27. Re:upside down keypads? by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      Yes. they operated one of these early cash registers.

      Note the distinct lack of a 3x3 grid of numbers 1 through 9, because these cash registers were mechanical not digital.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    28. Re:upside down keypads? by rkww · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to your reference, they measured the time taken to dial using the 7-8-9 and the 1-2-3 keypads, and the 1-2-3 was slightly faster: "arrangement I-A had an average keying time of 5.08 seconds, and arrangement IV-A had an average of 4.92 seconds." which is pretty much the point of the article: they measured this stuff.

    29. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile here in Japan they randomize the keys on the touch screen for security

    30. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did AT&T perhaps "help" design early ATMs?

      Yes - most ATMs are made by NCR which, like IBM, have had a long relationsship with AT&T - even an aqusition and spin-off

    31. Re:upside down keypads? by quetwo · · Score: 2

      Having just two letters that represented the digits was just a transition from manual operators to a step-switch. Back when, people knew the name of their central office... for example, mine was Carriage Acres, plus a 5 digit number (95985). Shortly before we got that number, many only had three digit numbers -- Carriage Acres plus a 3 digit. When they started moving towards automated switching, they replaced our phones with the notifier (arm that you cranked) with phones that had the rotary dial and the letters on the numbers (first time we'd seen that). We still had to contact the operator to go outside our area for a while (or when we needed help finding somebody's number), but eventually they came up with area codes. People then forgot their exchange names, and started with just the two letters. Then the letters went away and we started with the long string of 7 digits (plus the area code). Then they took my nice rotary dial phone away and put in a crappy 2500. A year later, they replaced our 2500 with one that had the * and # on it. Then they broke up.

    32. Re:upside down keypads? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      Are you telling me that the Romans and the Chinese are responsible for big-endian ordering?

      Since they invented the computer, yes.

    33. Re: upside down keypads? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      The letters were already associated with those numbers, and were part of how the dialing system worked (since US phone numbers used to consist of both letters and numbers). Your suggestion would've caused untold chaos.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    34. Re:upside down keypads? by David_W · · Score: 1

      Interesting... how do blind people use the ATMs there?

    35. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. Your use of PIN number appears to imply that ATM machine is redundant. But ATM == Autonomous Transitioning of Money. So calling something an ATM machine makes perfect sense, as it is referring to a machine used in the Autonomous Transitioning of Money from the bank to you (ie, no bank teller).

    36. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But ATM == Autonomous Transitioning of Money

      Nope, "Automated Teller Machine"

    37. Re:upside down keypads? by vlpronj · · Score: 1

      I would guess by Braille, as seen or felt on Drive Up ATM consoles, at least in my area.

    38. Re:upside down keypads? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the proliferation of letters on keypads (a lot of countries did not have them) in recent years have made 1-2-3 more prevalent.

      Fortunately, the proliferation of touch screen smartphones puts you into the position to choose what you want.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    39. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good god for the moron that put Braille on drive up atm consoles.

    40. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh...

    41. Re:upside down keypads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of last year, all ATMs in the US are required to have it. Some people have made some money by going to the drive through ATMs and looking for missing Braille markings. If the markings are missing, then the people file an ADA lawsuit against the financial institution, which is usually settled.

    42. Re:upside down keypads? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      No, but they had the higher numbers higher up, which is the significant difference between phone pads and other pads.

    43. Re:upside down keypads? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I've driven my (then) girlfriend to the ATM, and her being blind, she would sit behind me and operate the ATM through the window. Thanks to the moron who put Braille and a voice option on it.

    44. Re:upside down keypads? by gargleblast · · Score: 1
      That is an amazing paper, thanks for the link. But, John Karlin actually contributed to that too. Among the acknowledgments:

      The author would like to thank J. E. Karlin for his advice in conducting the latter phases of the program and in writing this report.

    45. Re:upside down keypads? by Gregory+Arenius · · Score: 2

      "Given that calculators were probably most commonly used in finance initially, I would guess that the most common number used (possibly even now) would be 0. Placing that most common number at the thumb position has clear utility, similar to that of the spacebar."

      To expound on this a bit, the design is not arbitrary. In finance digits don't actually occur with equal frequency. 1s are far more common than 9s for example. See Benford's Law for more info. Its used in forensic accounting to help detect cooked books.

      I use a '10 key' for a couple hours doing books most workdays and it would definitely be less convient if the numbers were flipped. Having said that I don't have a problem with phone keypads. I think this might be because phone dialing is almost exclusively done with thumbs on modern phones so you don't use the same muscle memory you do when using a '10 key.'

    46. Re:upside down keypads? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Azerty sucks for anything requiring punctuation, i.e. most programming languages & CLIs.

      I can't do the angle brackets on one without taking my shoes off.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    47. Re:upside down keypads? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The braille dots move around when it randomizes the keypad? How do they do that then?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    48. Re:upside down keypads? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The costs involved in tracking & managing different types compared to simply having them all identical would far outweigh the cents that an embossed plate costs.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    49. Re:upside down keypads? by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Yes! - I remember that!

      I were among those that discovered that the rubber keypad on the "Danmark" phones could be cut and the wires to the rows could be switched (individual wires), so we simply cut up the keypad in three rows, switched the wires for the top and 3rd row and voila! - We had the old ordering back.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    50. Re:upside down keypads? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      They should make a Dvorak keypad, with the most commonly used number in the middle.

    51. Re:upside down keypads? by trb · · Score: 1

      That's amusing. It's definitely possible to interpret the text the way you describe, and looking again, I'm sure that's what the author intended. But not only is the preceding phrase describing 123 on the top, so is the following phrase. So the parenthetical phrase refers to the 123 on the bottom, but in "it made for more accurate dialing," "it" flips back to 123 on top.

    52. Re:upside down keypads? by rpstrong · · Score: 3, Interesting

      10-key adding machines were also mechanical. I pulled one apart once; it had a series of flexible springs held between two plastic plates which translated the keypress to a series of wheels. The plate would move sideways with each keypress in order to engage the wheel for the next digit.

      I suspect that that the cash registers didn't change over as quickly for several reasons, including:

          - A cash register didn't have as much need to be as compact as a desk calculator.
          - The clerk could see the buttons that were pressed, confirming the price before hitting enter.
          - An accounting clerk had more need for a 'heads down' entry system.

      [I was such a clerk, I was once blazing fast on the 10-key, and I was always annoyed by the 'upside down' phone layout.]

    53. Re:upside down keypads? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      "So when they went to the key pad, the phone engineers decided that since the 0 was besides the 9 on every phone they made, it should stay close to the 9 on the final phone layout. Hence 1-2-3 on top, 7-8-9 on the bottom, and *-0-# on the bottom. (Or on old keypads, 0 aligned with either the 8 or 9)."

      Sorta, kinda inaccurate. The phone engineers did not make the decision, the behavioral engineers (led by Mr. Karlin) did. And they made their decision based on testing; people were simply faster with the 1-2-3 on top.

  2. Insight by foobsr · · Score: 1
    TFS: behavioral sciences could answer some questions about telephone design

    Kudos

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  3. This obit reminds me of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woody Allen's piece on the invention of the sandwich ("Yes, But Can the Steam Engine Do This?" in "Getting Even")

  4. As a life long Phone Phreaker . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I shall mourn his loss.

    1. Re:As a life long Phone Phreaker . . . by JustOK · · Score: 2

      whistle a mournful tune

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  5. Arguably.... by stox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He was also the Father of the User Interface. He was the first to take human factors into consideration in the design or products.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Arguably.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arguably the concept of the user interface is a bit older - at least a few million years old. Think of, for example, the knife. This weird and rare design has integrated business logic and user interface into one device, though the business logic of a knife is better known by the name "blade" and the user interface as "handle".

  6. Re:Steve Jobs???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, Steve Jobs invented the phone after all.

  7. Re:Steve Jobs???? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, Steve Jobs didn't want a keypad on his iPhone, so I guess he didn't think it was cool enough for a phone, directly contradicting John Karlin's life work in the psychology of telephone design. But we know Karlin was cool too, so now there's the obvious question, who was cooler? Because I need to know if keypads on a phone is hot or not.

  8. So it's his fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've worked jobs with nine-button phones and with mechanical / electro-mechanical calculators.

    Mostly, you'd take a breath and reset internally to make the swap. And hopefully notice not too many taps past the inevitable reversals. While cursing whoeverinhell didn't follow the established international keypad convention with the new phones.

    It's not like calculators were exotic. Sure nobody had them at home, but a hell of a lot of people used them at work. Basic kit of all clerical work everywhere.

    I still screw-up by 'reversing' sometimes on the computer keypad. It's a scar.

    But cheers John Karlin. I'm sure you did your best with a difficult choice.

  9. No, Steve Jobs was evil, not "cool" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure all digital dialing had its problems and not everyone thought it was cool either. It probably was more beneficial though than anything Steve "invented".

  10. The Mallina dude is the real Shiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to TFA a Bell Labs engineer named Mallina patented a touchtone layout years before anyone else had even thought about the problem, only it was two rows of five buttons (1-5 above 6-0), which was eventually rejected by Karlin's group.

    I think I'd actually prefer the two row layout in terms of dialing speed, although there would be a question of fit with today's phones.

  11. Re:Steve Jobs???? by Dracos · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I got my second cell phone in 2007, I also switched from T-Mobile to Sprint. I narrowed down my choices to the Motorola RAZR or ic502, both clamshell models. The deciding factor: the RAZR didn't have a raised dot on the 5 key, so I got the ic502.

    I hated that phone every minute of the next three and a half years.

  12. Cool part: 50+ years later, ur still charged extra by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    Doesn't the phone company charge an extra fee for digital dialing? As if it's still costing them extra?

  13. First "user interface" with any smarts by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He was also the Father of the User Interface. He was the first to take human factors into consideration in the design or products.

    No, that goes back at least to the Gilbreths. Frank Gilbreth created time and motion study for industrial work. His wife, Lillian Gilbreth was more on the product side. She is responsible, among other things, for kitchens with long continuous counter space with cooking surfaces and sinks at the same level.

    The first "intelligent user interface" is hard to pinpoint. Railroad interlocking control boards were close. They prevented the operator from doing anything that would cause a collision (that's why they're called interlockings) but didn't help set up routes. The General Railway Signal NX system in 1936 was probably the first automatic intelligent user interface. Routes were set up by pressing a button to indicate where a train was going to enter the controlled area. Lights on a track model board would then light up indicating all the places it could exit. The operator would select one, push one exit button, and all the switches and signals for the route would be set accordingly. The control system took into account all trains present, and all routes already set up, so only safe routes could be set. The operator could even set track or switches out of service and the system would route trains around the area of trouble.

  14. Professional Violinist? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

    Don't tell me: John Karlin and the Touch-Tones.

    1. Re:Professional Violinist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon; this is funny. Somebody mod Jane up!

    2. Re:Professional Violinist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Karlin and the Multi-Frequency Dual Tones.

      FTFY

  15. Re:Steve Jobs???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see you've been marked "Flamebait" and the parent comment was marked "-1 Troll". Let me just add my voice: lsulfate also thinks Steve Jobs was not cool.

  16. Re:Cool part: 50+ years later, ur still charged ex by adolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't the phone company charge an extra fee for digital dialing? As if it's still costing them extra?

    When I was a kid, we had a variety of telephones in the house. Some hung on the wall, some had dials, and some had buttons. In the beginning, all of the phones (including those with buttons) used pulse dialing. I remember two distinct conversations between my parents regarding this issue, the first from sometime in the 80s and the second in the early 90s:

    1. "Should we pay for Touch-Tone(tm) service?" "It's expensive. We already pay too much for phone service." "It's only a couple of dollars a month, and we can dial faster."

    And so it was. We had Touch-Tone(tm), and life was really neither better nor worse, just different. It was a line-item on the bill until

    2. "They want to sell us call waiting and three-way calling and distinctive ring services, all bundled up. Can we use those?" "Maybe. Then the kids would have their own phone numbers."

    And so it was. With the change of service, the Touch-Tone(tm) item dropped off, though I remember my dad calling to order package and insisting upon it being that way...

    And as an adult, I've never been billed for it. And these days, I don't have a land line at all. Come to think of it, it's been years since I've used a real phone that actually used DTMF itself: It's always either a digital office phone, some incarnation of VOIP, or a cell phone.

  17. Re:Steve Jobs???? by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No-one thinks Steve Jobs is cool, except the douchiest of Apple fanatics. He wore sneakers and jeans and black turtleneck. That is not cool.

    Actually, as a non Apple fanatic; I thought he was pretty cool. Went a bit too far in his later years though.

    I think far too many people think of him only in his "hip" later years, showing off the latest iGadget to crowds of adoring fans then heading back to Apple and being a "hard taskmaster" to the developers. They then retroactively apply this personality to his earlier years and assume he was always a douche. By all accounts he was a bit of a revolutionary back then; a "fuck the system, I'll do what I want" kind of guy. I admire that in business leaders in the technical world.

    He appeared to truly want things to be better for people. He probably didn't achieve that and definitely lost sight of some important aspects of "better" in his later years; but desire is what should be measured for the mettle of a man, not results. So, I still give him the benefit of the doubt - he wanted things to be better, and he tried really hard to achieve that result. That's something that I personally find pretty cool.

    (although I'd rather swap my toilet paper for sand paper than be forced to use an iPhone or iPad as my daily mobile computing device - so you can hardly call me an Apple fan)

    But you are right that this comment has absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic.

    --
    My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
    Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  18. Re:The Truth About Auschwitz and The FDA by nukenerd · · Score: 0

    The only way for upstanding citizens to protect themselves from this madness is to retreat from modern society entirely.

    You could start by cutting your Internet connection.

  19. Re:Steve Jobs???? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    Well, Steve Jobs invented the phone after all.

    I know it's funny, but someone modded it as "Informative"! (as at 1014 hrs GMT) Is there a way here of modding a mod as "funny"?

  20. Re:Steve Jobs???? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    But we know Karlin was cool

    Karlin was cool? Sounds like a jerk to me.

    1) Got numeric keys the wrong way up

    2) Shortens co-workers phone leads in the middle of the night until they complained loud enough for him to hear. They might have been irritated long before that point, and how would they necessarily know to complain to him. Could he not have confined the experiment to his own phone? Co-incidentally, yesterday I rigged a cord for an overhead bathroom switch. It only took a minute to fix an optimum length by trying it, and getting my wife to try it too.

    3) Replaces a rotary dial with push buttons - a no-brainer as all electro-mechanical devices were being replaced with electronics at that time.

    4) Believed that people can remember a 7-digit number - they can't, unless it is one they use regularly

  21. Re:Steve Jobs???? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    No-one thinks Steve Jobs is cool .... He wore sneakers and jeans and black turtleneck. That is not cool.

    Hey, steady on, sneakers and jeans and black turtleneck were cool (in 1963).

  22. Re:Steve Jobs???? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    If it makes you feel any better, you probably would have hated the RAZR, too. All but the very last GSM model had shit reception and its wasn't that hot either. They were awkward to hold because of their thin-ness and the battery life was crap, maybe half of triplets.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. Re:Steve Jobs???? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I think far too many people think of him only in his "hip" later years, showing off the latest iGadget to crowds of adoring fans then heading back to Apple and being a "hard taskmaster" to the developers. They then retroactively apply this personality to his earlier years and assume he was always a douche.

    But some people have read folklore.org and the Tao of Mac and we know that he was always a douche.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. Cause of Romans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The system with higher numbers on top goes back to the Roman and Chinese abacus, so it's not arbitrary at all.

    Gee, I can smell it already. Are you suggesting it's again all the way back to width of the Horse Arse !

  25. Re:Cool part: 50+ years later, ur still charged ex by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    My father refused to pay extra for touch tone, and never did. They kept charging extra long after it was all computerized and there was no more specialized hardware listening for clicks on the company side.

    Don't know about today, but about 5 years ago my old house only had rotary-enabled service, so we would dial to renew prescriptions and then switch he button to touch tone.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  26. Re:Steve Jobs???? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    1) Got numeric keys the wrong way up

    I don't know how you count in your country, but we count from 1 to 9 without any jumping back from 9 to 4 or from 6 to one.

    Which happens to be the order of keys on a telephone. Repeat after me: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    You probably shouldn't have watched Sesame Street episodes out of order... :-)

    --
    bickerdyke
  27. Obligatory Freberg by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    http://dmdb.org/lyrics/freberg.underground.html#A4

    Alas, I couldn't find a site with an actual audio recording of it--the tune was as funny as the lyrics.

  28. No need to dial on a party line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, we had, gasp, a party line. You didn't even need to dial
    to hear a conversation. Ah, the good ol' days.

  29. "And you thought Steve Jobs was cool." by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    No, I didn't.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"And you thought Steve Jobs was cool." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, that whole bow-tie thing he was doing in the early 80's.. what was up with that?

  30. Obligatory xkcd by Chemisor · · Score: 1
  31. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you thought Steve Jobs was cool to the touch

    FTFY

  32. Done right by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Western Electric took their time and engineered a marvel of function. Too bad nobody bothered to save the tooling for those things.

    A lot more engineering effort nowadays is rightly focused on the extremely profitable control of product life cycles.

    I wonder what sort of volume Unicomp is doing lately?

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    1. Re:Done right by foobsr · · Score: 1

      Unicomp seems to be well off, Wikipedia: "Recently, Unicomp has begun expanding their product line. Due to customer demand showing that this was no longer a special request, Unicomp now sells beige, black, and colored key caps, with printing and without. In addition, Unicomp sells replacement parts for older IBM/Lexmark keyboards, and will repair just about any keyboard manufactured by themselves, IBM, or Lexmark." (emphasis mine)

      No wonder if you are based on the Model M (I own two, both from the beginning of the 90ies).

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  33. Re:Steve Jobs???? by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

    '...sneakers and jeans and black turtleneck were cool (in 1963).'

    No, they weren't.

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  34. Re:The Truth About Auschwitz and The FDA by hoboroadie · · Score: 0

    Somebody spends too much time studying at the feet of Master Jeff Rense.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  35. Re:Steve Jobs???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4) Believed that people can remember a 7-digit number - they can't, unless it is one they use regularly

    What other seven-digit numbers would you need to remember? 867-5309?

    My dad's cell has been his primary phone for over a decade, and he still doesn't store any numbers on the phone. He dials an ungodly number of, er, numbers from memory.

  36. Jenny's phone number by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If it weren't for him, Jenny's Phone Number might have been "UNion 75309".

    Doesn't have quite the same ring to it.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  37. Oh, it's better than that. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

    Pulse dialing actually cost the phone company more for a long time, as I understand it, because it kept the switching circuitry busy longer than tone dialing. But they'd won the right to charge extra for tone dialing, and the more people shifted to tone dialing (for its obvious benefits), the more money they could get.

    My wife and I were also holdouts, keeping our cheap electronic phones set to pulse-dial (hit "speed dial 8", then wait for the clickety-clicking to finish), switching to tone-dial as needed for voicemail. Even if it wasn't worth spending a few extra seconds a day to save a few extra cents a day, it was worth it to us to deny the phone company those ill-gotten cents.

  38. Re:Steve Jobs???? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    10th doctor - sneakers. Jobs was 33% cool.
    You've also just described what I was wearing frequently in 63 (at 9 years old) so thanks, I think.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  39. How the Rhinoscerous Got All His Digits by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 5, Funny

    When we were growing up on our little island in the Caribbean we could just pick up the 'phone --- and yes, oh best beloved, in those days an apostrophe would typically precede the word phone --- we'd dial five digits. And the call would just go through.

    Not seven, not ten. Never eleven! It is so obvious looking back, the seconds we saved by not dialing those unnecessary digits stretched into minutes, hours, days... by 1980 we were wandering, listless, the burden of those extra hours weighed heavily on us. Many would gaze at their telephones, silently pleading for some sign or answer. But the phones were silent too --- with so much accrued time it was pointless, there was nothing left to say, all had been said.

    Then one day a visitor came ashore and asked the number for such-and-such. While dialing the five digits they remarked, "We dial seven. This would not work where I come from."

    What an disturbing idea! Ripples of amusement and shock passed through our small society. 'Phones began to ring once again as people mulled this concept. It was unsettling, the idea that should we venture too far from home those familiar numbers we use to communicate would simply not work!

    But how far was too far, we wondered? In whispers at first. For now it was possible there was some unknown, invisible boundary surrounding us. For our safety and that of our children it must be mapped. So we asked for volunteers... and sent them out to neighboring islands at all points of the compass, and the US mainland --- and waited by our 'phones.

    We sighed with relief when the first reports came in from adjacent islands. Five digits, all clear!

    But then our worst fears were confirmed. From Puerto Rico, nothing. From The United States, nothing. We never heard from those brave souls again. Time accrued and the days became longer still.

    Then one day a village idiot --- the same who had once suggested we borrow a lug nut from each of the other wheels --- wondered that maybe there are really seven digits... but two of them are somehow invisible. A digits of the land and one of the sky he said, that are unknown to us because we live on and breathe them unaware.

    I was intrigued by this idea. What would those digits be? How could one discover them? There are only a hundred possibilities. We all were amused by this but I was perhaps the first one who actually started dialing through them. That is when I discovered that 'phones are patient. Unlike all the people I knew, my 'phone did not seem to mind if I repeatedly dialled numbers that did not work. I had found a new friend!

    It is hard to describe what happens after a lifetime of complacent acceptance, as one applies barely an hour of concentrated effort towards some insane idea -- only to reach a moment where you break through and the world changes forever. The call went through and my friend picked up and I heard a familliar 'Hello?' For In those days, oh best beloved, when we answered our 'phone we always said "Hello." We did not bark or grunt, and especially not the impolite "...yes?" or "what the fuck now??" of today.

    I shouted breathlessly "I am speaking to you from SEVEN DIGITS! SEVEN! Can you hear me??" Sure, he said, I don't think he knew what I meant and it was past midnight anyway. Being a scientist or explorer of uncharted waters is a heady responsibility. I circled and underlined the two amazing digits and proceeded to complete the sweep. The next combination yielded nothing, and the next. Finally --- the last.

    Only one circled pair of digits on my worksheet. I had concieved a simple experiment of technology that was bound to an existential question, performed an exploratory experiment and had obtained a clear and astounding result. We were all saved, we could dial seven digits now like everyone else... and all our time would be spent dialing --- glorious dialing!

    I hugged my 'phone.

    And in days to come I would discover that dialling a leading '1' forced long distance trunking to occur (Why are these local numbe

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re:How the Rhinoscerous Got All His Digits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just beautiful, man.

  40. Re:Cool part: 50+ years later, ur still charged ex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My father refused to pay extra for touch tone, and never did. They kept charging extra long after it was all computerized and there was no more specialized hardware listening for clicks on the company side.

    Don't know about today

    My Dad also refused to pay extra for touch tone, and I also thought it was a ridiculous fee after everything was computerized.

    I'm not sure when they stopped charging (early 90's, maybe?), but now it's no longer a line item. And my parents have touch tone service.

  41. Allen Sherman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in gradeschool this song came out: the Let's All Call Up AT&T and Protest to the President March:

    I was too young at the time to understand what it was about, but it is amusing now.

    1. Re:Allen Sherman by neminem · · Score: 1

      Heh. I wasn't even alive when that change was made; I still heard that song as a kid and was amused by it, even if its context was relegated to "historical curiosity".

  42. Re:Cool part: 50+ years later, ur still charged ex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Canada it was the same situation. $3 extra a month for touch-tone dialing from Bell. My parents refused to pay. At some point maybe in the late 90's new accounts were forced to be touch-tone, but you still had to pay the extra $3. It just was no longer a line item in the bill, tricky bastards.

    Older accounts like ours were exempted from the forced switch. And until I ported the number to VoIP last year we were still saving on that $3 every month.

    Now they pay $2 a month for a DID number service from voip.ms. Take that Bell Canada.

    Between VoIP for your landlines, digital terrestrial channels for TV, Netflix, 3rd party ISPs like Teksavvy and Wind Mobile for cell phones there *is* a path to freedom from the communication oligopolies that run Canada.

  43. Re:Steve Jobs???? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    4) Believed that people can remember a 7-digit number - they can't, unless it is one they use regularly

    What other seven-digit numbers would you need to remember?

    Any number, like the plumber's, that you have just looked up in a directory or got off the Web needs to be transferred to the phone pad. Perhaps I'm retarded, but I cannot do that without glancing back at the number part way through.

  44. Re:Steve Jobs???? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    ....... we count from 1 to 9 without any jumping back from 9 to 4 or from 6 to one. Which happens to be the order of keys on a telephone

    .... but not the order of keys on a calculator or a full PC keyboard. Se elsewhere in this discussion for why this is. .

  45. Press 1 or stay on the line by tepples · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm not getting the point of that strip. I've never run into a residential or cellular voice mail system that requires DTMF interaction to leave a message. If anything it's "press 1 or stay on the line". Which modern voice mail system is it satirizing?

  46. Re:Steve Jobs???? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    ....... we count from 1 to 9 without any jumping back from 9 to 4 or from 6 to one. Which happens to be the order of keys on a telephone

    .... but not the order of keys on a calculator or a full PC keyboard. Se elsewhere in this discussion for why this is. .

    Yes, but the key order on a calculator is the wrong one as it is NOT going straight from 1 to 9. Yes, there were reasons why they put them in a different order, but that does not automatically makes that the right order.

    --
    bickerdyke
  47. Another study by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

    It was found that telephone numbers could be remembered better if the exchange was last. If you look up a number, the exchange is likely to be a familiar number, one of maybe ten, while the other four digits are essentially new to you. You have a better chance of remembering the number long enough to dial it if the unfamiliar part comes first. Never implemented, probably because the nature of stepping relays made it impractical.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  48. Re:Steve Jobs???? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_plus_or_minus_two

    You're retarded, but you're in good company. Unless I can compress it some way I can't do 6 reliably.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  49. Re:Steve Jobs???? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    Oh, and :-

    6) Shortened phone leads from 3 ft, which sounds long. However in the 1950/60s office phones were quite scarce and often shared between several people. Desks were placed face-to-face in pairs or groups of four to share a phone, in which case that 3 ft was all needed, and more. But, Karlin worked in a phone company office, where no doubt phones were all over the place and that fact does not seem to have occurred to him.

    I have worked with people like Karlin. The same sort of busy-bodies who will change your chair height and adjust your screen brightness when you are not looking because they have views on the subject. They volunteer for the "Elf and Safety" courses and become the office safety vigilante, and get biscuits banned at meetings because they are considered unhealthy. They are jerks.

  50. Re:Steve Jobs???? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    Oh, and :-

    5) He thought that to go electronic and/or to extend the srange, the dial code needed to be all digits. Why? The old alpha characters were already translated into digits, so why couldn't buttons do the same?

    FTFA : "telephone exchanges that spelled pronounceable words were starting to be exhausted. All-digit dialing would create a cache of new phone numbers". Who said they had to be pronouncable? My postcode (zip code to Americans?) and most others are not pronouncable (eg mine starts "NP16" - the 16th area of Newport - and goes on with another digit and two letters which I dont want to put here) but neverthless are much easier to remember than all-digit phone numbers.

  51. Re:Steve Jobs???? by xenobyte · · Score: 2

    4) Believed that people can remember a 7-digit number - they can't, unless it is one they use regularly

    Really? - Numbers here in Denmark are 8-digit and I remember most of the numbers in my contact list and often dial them directly instead of using the contact list.

    Oh, and US numbers are actually 10-digit, but for most local and semi-local calls the 3-digit area code can be omitted.

    We used to have the same kind of area codes in Denmark (6-digit numbers and 2-digit area codes that could be omitted on local calls) but about 20 years ago it was decided to throw away the disposable area codes and merge them with the phone numbers, making them always 8-digit. This also allowed for portable numbers that could be moved all over the country, from provider to provider and of course from fixed line to mobile and back.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  52. Re:Old cash registers? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

    Those old registers reminded me of the first one that I used, an NCR (National Cash Register) that was already old for its time. The data plate called out the required power: Zero to 120 volts, zero to 60 cycles. And if the power failed, you could stick a crank in the side.

  53. Introduction of Touch Tone System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Touch Tone system may have been offered to private subscribers in 1963, but the 1962 World's Fair was serviced by a Touch Tone switch brought in especially for the event. All the payphones in the fairgrounds were Touch Tone.

  54. Damn 1- by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

    You know what pisses me off?
    To dial long distance, I have to dial "1-" first (which is OK, since I don't want to call LD by accident). But if I do dial "1-" and then a number that isn't long distance,
    it says "BEE-BEE-BEEP Your call can not be put through as dialed. Please dial again."

    Knowing what is long distance and what isn't is very complicated around here. If I start the number with "1-" it means "I don't care if the number is long distance".
    If I don't care that the number is long distance, I certainly won't care if it isn't.
    So annoying.