Slashdot Mirror


Spaceport Development Picks Up Steam In Texas

RocketAcademy writes "The Lone Star State is moving to become a leader in spaceport development. The Houston Airport System is officially moving ahead with plans to turn Ellington Airport, near NASA's Johnson Space Center, into an FAA-licensed commercial spaceport. The airport system has completed a feasibility study for turning the field into a spaceport for suborbital spacecraft such as Virgin Galactic's SpaceShip Two and XCOR's Lynx. In the longer term, spacecraft could link Houston to Singapore in as little as three hours, according to airport system director Mario Diaz. Meanwhile, state Representative Rene Oliveira (D-Brownsville) introduced a bill that would allow county commissioners to close a local beach for launches from the proposed SpaceX launch site in Cameron County. The bill is part of a flood of spaceport-related legislation that has been introduced recently in the Texas legislature."

116 comments

  1. Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hours.. by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Line for the 10-mile-high club forms to the rear of the craft.)

    "and thank-you for riding Virgin Galactic. We hope you'll come again."

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  2. Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Science, shame they don't teach that in Texas schools.

    1. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey guess what? I am a Texas high school student and I am currently doing chemistry homework.

    2. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey guess what? I am a Texas high school student and I am currently doing chemistry homework.

      No you're not, you are wasting time on /.

    3. Re:Science by sethstorm · · Score: 0

      That, and it's not theft only if you're a business and bring it to Texas.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    4. Re:Science by Dasuraga · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I get that it's a joke, but I'm really tired of hearing people demean Texas' education system.
      While the state might not do so well in math and science test comparisons compared to other states, the state excels at making many things available to students that are rare if non-existent elsewhere. The right to a good education is in the state constitution (which also asks for the foundation of "first-class" state universities: University of Texas and Texas A&M), and implements a very broad wealth redistribution scheme (Robin hood plan), which makes sure that even very poor school districts can pay for AP classes, music electives, sports facilities, the works. Children who show potential are given chances from a very early age to enter advanced-placement courses, and many efforts are made by teachers to identify children who can enter these.

      I honestly think that the low rankings of Texas in Math and Science comparisons is more due to demographics than the school system, and in more general rankings the school fares much better. In any case, it goes to great lengths to let children broaden their horizons with their peers, independent of social class.

    5. Re:Science by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 0

      So you're saying it's the people that're stupid and that it's not the schools' fault? Somehow, that doesn't seem a whole lot better or laudatory...

    6. Re:Science by Dasuraga · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, I'm saying that the demographics of Texas (5th poorest state in the nation by poverty rate, among other things) cause the lower rankings, not the school system. The school system gives the tools for motivated children to learn, but when these children don't get three meals a day....

    7. Re:Science by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2

      Gotcha! I'll buy that line of reasoning. I remember reading somewhere that when the school system provides a free lunch, kids do better. When the school system provides a free breakfast (also, or instead, I forget which...) the kids do even better. This is most effective when the kids getting the free or reduced cost meals are not pointed out and do not feel like they're different from the other kids who don't get the free meals (like not having special meal card colors or anything).
      .
      There's also the "discount approach" where the tax burden is decreased and people are told that the "extras" can be paid for by the parents or by extra fees. Then, the rich area schools get their enrichment or after-school program paid for by parents who can afford it, whereas the poorer neighborhoods all do without. Yet the political idiots can claim that all of the schools are equal because the same opportunity is afforded to all, the poor just aren't getting the money together to give their kds the bonuses. [french nobility idiot's quote: the law in all its majesty also forbids the rich from sleeping under the bridges as much as it forbids the poor from doing so. The rich just have no need for sleeping under the bridge].
      .
      Third rant [you've set me off for these rants, i apologize]: somehow they can always find the money for the football teams ( for the uniforms, for the sod to get redone yearly, for the scoreboards, for the extra bus trips, for all of those extra items), yet there's never enough money to do the artistic extracurriculars or the scientific or others (either enough money for math club or for model U.N. but not for both, or we have to choose between music programs or visual arts, but not both). Texas must have an extra large problem with football, at least if everything I saw on Friday Night Lights was to be believed. I live in La Jolla (San Diego, CA). What's the football situation really like in Texas? Does it really suck up all of the money and the oxygen from the rest of the school system?

    8. Re:Science by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Eh, teaching is overrated. When you have a GDP that is sufficient to land you between Australia and Russia, you can afford to simply import the folks with book learnin'. See: NASA.

      Of course, that doesn't stop some of us from getting one of those edjumacations. When I wanted to study Computer Science some more (instead of following up on one of the three separate internships I had in the space industry as an undergrad), I ended up pursuing my graduate coursework at a major Texas university, for instance. Now, I'll be the first to admit that having to type and move my cursor while on horseback took some getting used to, but it's really quite enjoyable after awhile.

    9. Re:Science by crutchy · · Score: 1

      there's big oil, patent lawsuits and guns... what else could texans possibly want?

    10. Re:Science by Opyros · · Score: 1
      The quote you're probably thinking of is this, from Anatole France's The Red Lily:

      The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

    11. Re:Science by Intropy · · Score: 1

      Football is certainly a popular sport in Texas both for players and spectators. Where I lived it was definitely thought of as culturally important to a decent number of students, but that of course varied widely across the student body. And it was well funded with a nice field, good equipment, etc. On the other hand other activities didn't seem to suffer from lack of funding. I was in Academic Decathlon, the chess club, debate, and the tennis team. We had art classes, theater, band, orchestra, soccer, lacrosse, basketball, baseball, and pretty much everything else (except model U.N. I do not recall that). I just visited the schools web site and it list 56 clubs/extracurriculars, 12 sports, and 8 arts programs. So I'd have to say plenty of oxygen to go around. I did live in suburban Dallas though, whereas Friday Night Lights is depicting rural Texas about which I have no experience to judge.

    12. Re:Science by Intropy · · Score: 1

      If you keep your extra battery under your stetson it's easier to balance.

    13. Re:Science by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Your comment would carry more weight if it didn't say right there in the headline that they were trying to build a steam-powered spaceport...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    14. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really depends on how school districts structure their cash flow, but most football programs do get a lot of attention and money. Similar to collegiate atheletics, successful programs can cover the majority of their own costs via student activity fees, fundraisers, limited sponsorships (bascially amounts to the game announcer saying thank you to a local buisiness either pre or post game, similar to PBS thank you spots) and donations. That being said if budgets get tight football programs are usually the last to suffer. The old movie Mr Holland's Opus pretty much hit the nail on the head with the line "The day they cut the football budgets in this state is the end of Western Civilization as we know it."

    15. Re:Science by Theaetetus · · Score: 0

      I get that it's a joke, but I'm really tired of hearing people demean Texas' education system. While the state might not do so well in math and science test comparisons compared to other states, the state excels at making many things available to students that are rare if non-existent elsewhere. The right to a good education is in the state constitution (which also asks for the foundation of "first-class" state universities: University of Texas and Texas A&M), and implements a very broad wealth redistribution scheme (Robin hood plan), which makes sure that even very poor school districts can pay for AP classes, music electives, sports facilities, the works. Children who show potential are given chances from a very early age to enter advanced-placement courses, and many efforts are made by teachers to identify children who can enter these. I honestly think that the low rankings of Texas in Math and Science comparisons is more due to demographics than the school system, and in more general rankings the school fares much better. In any case, it goes to great lengths to let children broaden their horizons with their peers, independent of social class.

      Straight from good points headlong into the racism we tend to expect from Texans.

    16. Re:Science by dywolf · · Score: 1

      add to that, if you're a resident of texas, and you join the military, your college education is free (at least to the state schools, honorable discharge required). And that's on top of your federal gi bill benefits.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    17. Re:Science by Dasuraga · · Score: 1

      Demographics was a bad choice of word. I mainly meant the fact that Texas is super poor(5th poorest in the nation by poverty rate), and there's a pretty well documented correlation between poverty and educational results.

    18. Re:Science by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      But your doing it for Jesus, aren't you.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    19. Re:Science by sycodon · · Score: 3, Informative

      What you and everyone else is missing is that Texas is burdened with educating hundreds of thousands, if not more, illegal aliens. In fact, Kids come across the border to attend our school. Why? Fuck if I know, but the courts said we have to let them in for some reason.

      So now you have to feed them, hire Bi-Lingual teachers, and then deal with the inevitable gang problems. Just look at San Antonio ISD.

      The district my kids went to is rated tops in the nation in all the math and science scores and guess what? 99.9% of the kids that go there speak English and are not in gangs. If you think I should pony up more tax dollars to make sure a bunch of illegals on the border get a nice stadium and band instruments, then I think you should too.

      As for Football, aside from the initial capital investments, the programs are run mostly on ticket sales and other fund raisers. Same thing with the Bands.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    20. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're just jealous that God has ordained Texas to be a spaceport state.

    21. Re:Science by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      Demographics was a bad choice of word. I mainly meant the fact that Texas is super poor(5th poorest in the nation by poverty rate), and there's a pretty well documented correlation between poverty and educational results.

      Fair enough. Criticism withdrawn.

    22. Re:Science by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The sports games (in theory) pay for themselves in various ways.

    23. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that doesn't get modded funny...

    24. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonono, fuck this shit. Demographics is not a racist word.

    25. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if he's he's doing a comparison study on steam powered rockets vs. ones with chemical propellants.

      (Spoiler alert: See /. article title if you don't get it)

  3. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by masternerdguy · · Score: 1

    Because the EM Drive is today's cold fusion. Call me when they have a working prototype zooming through the solar system.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
  4. Now you can leave Texas at Mach 10. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only problem is...nobody wants to come back.

    1. Re:Now you can leave Texas at Mach 10. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which explains why the state recently gained additional seats in the House of Representatives. It's growth rate is outpacing the national average by a decent amount since people are moving into it at a pretty rapid rate. And, honestly, having moved here a little over a decade ago, I can see why. Sure, there's some truth to the various stereotypes, but having lived for roughly equal amounts of time in California, Florida, and Texas, I'd pick Texas over the other two any day. The people are nicer, you get a LOT more bang for your buck in the housing market, and there's high demand for folks with the sorts of skills the commenters here at Slashdot have. You'll deal with crazy people anywhere you go, but at least the Texas crazies are pleasant enough to be around.

    2. Re:Now you can leave Texas at Mach 10. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

      But seriously, if you think Texas crazies are pleasant enough to be around, you haven't met JR.

  5. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole plan relies on people being lifted up by the Rapture.

  6. Re:Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Texans, please choose your Malaysian prostitutes.

  7. Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Private space ports! How glorious! Just like in the 1970s with OTRAG! Oh wow!

  8. Cronyism at its finest by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    Since it's for the few and does not cater to the many, it's just cronyism done in the traditional Texas way.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Cronyism at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to all those companies opening free spaceports for the poor, right?

    2. Re:Cronyism at its finest by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed! How can they possibly justify suggesting that a large-ish military/NASA airport within spitting distance of Johnson Space Center be used as a spaceport?! Why, next thing you know, they'll try and pass it off as common sense. One person I met had the gall to suggest that because Houston is one of the largest urban centers in the nation, is within a short driving distance of 3 of the top 5 seaports in the nation (which might make transporting parts for these craft easier), and has a high concentration of individuals connected to the space industry, it makes sense to put a starport there. How dare there! Harumph.

    3. Re:Cronyism at its finest by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      WARNING: A Texan's (and especially a Houstonian's) definition "a short driving distance" may not correspond with common definitions found elsewhere in the country.

      --
      -
    4. Re:Cronyism at its finest by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Quite true. It's worth pointing out that I was thinking in terms of cargo shipping rather than passenger transport with that particular point, hence why I added that parenthetical statement above. Obviously, a 4-5 hour drive from Corpus Christi to Houston (which is the most distant of the 3 seaports I was referring to) is more than pretty much anyone would consider a "short drive" (even a Houstonian!), but if you're comparing it against a typical drive that a flatbed semi would have to take to deliver a large part for a spacecraft to the area (e.g. taking streets/highways all the way from Florida and across I-10), it's a lot less difficult to deal with. Plus, Houston itself has the second busiest port in the nation, and that's just a few minutes away from Ellington Field.

  9. With all the stolen businesses from other states by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    It only accelerates the speed of cattle rustling of businesses to Texas(sans workers unfortunately) while making sure it is too expensive for regular people to use it.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  10. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by flayzernax · · Score: 1

    Cold fusion exists. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_transmutation - there's even articles citing NASA Langley types talking about how they think its a reasonable research but they don't for whatever politics or funding issues.

    The difference between this and cold fusion though is that this is cheap to experiment on. Copper and microwave frequency transmitters are not that expensive. 4.5 ghz at what power I don't know exactly though. But it doesn't look like a lot and from white papers I read on their website, their own and the Chinese ones it seems like it should be reproducible.

    We may not understand the math for this, but I am surprised some people out there haven't dumped a few thousand dollars into the tech to make it more efficient and powerful.

    There's been some argument that because you can't patent something you can't explain in a scientific way means no large industry will pursue the tech without math they can legally use to protect their investment.

    That doesn't mean me linking it here seeing if other people might be interested in it is dumb. Yeah I'm doing free advertising for what I think is the next best thing. It's a serious technology though. It's just immature and we don't have a way to make CAD spit out plans for us automatically. Its going to require trial and error.

    I'm seriously tempted to try and reproduce it on a small scale.

  11. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cold fusion technically exists but doesn't release any useful amount of energy. So stating the fact cold fusion exists doesn't discredit the OP. This drive is a scam and violates laws of physics. Go make one and tell me how awesome it is.

  12. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by flayzernax · · Score: 1

    Equating cold fusion to an emdrive and a scam makes stating cold fusion as existing relevant. Most people put it off out of hand. I put it here for people to do further research. There's plenty of debate as to whether cold fusion is feasible as a power generating technology. Its not out of the race yet. I believe the same thing about emdrive.

    If your refering to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive

    It doesn't violate the conservation of momentum because it is speculated to be an OPEN SYSTEM.

    I am putting more faith in the 2008 Chinese peer review then random wiki about it and it also makes sense the way its described on the emdrive website.

    It's plausible that you can get thrust from this machine. Regardless of the physics involved.

  13. Space launch has a very low rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The number of launches to space is very low. I believe the FAA put around 50 major rocket launches, in the entire world last year. All the world's rocket launches could be handled form a single space port. ESA's French Guiana spaceport is probably the best one. The United States already has infrastructure at Cape Canaveral. I believe there is a glut of rocket models and spaceports in the United States, and world wide. Texas should stay out of the space launch business because of that.

    1. Re:Space launch has a very low rate by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      In 2010 there were close to 75 launches worldwide, of which about 30 were commercial launches.

      That said, with the rapid pace of commercial space development, it's likely that we'll see new vehicles in the "near future" that could start to deliver on the promise of passenger spacecraft and the like, so preparations should be made with that eventuality in mind. Even so, we're several years away, at a minimum, and in the meantime Ellington is still being actively used by NASA and the military, so it's not like they're letting the airport go to waste. They're simply getting the paperwork done so that the airport will be ready when the craft are ready, and considering that Ellington is just a few minutes away from Johnson Space Center, there is an absolutely massive number of engineers, technicians, developers, specialists, and other sorts of experts in the space industry just around the corner in case they need to be consulted or something goes wrong. As such, locating one of the nation's first spaceports there makes perfect sense.

    2. Re:Space launch has a very low rate by crutchy · · Score: 1

      if it weren't for baikonur (or however it's spelt) and the russians, there would be much less (not to mention there would be no space stations to visit either)

      the russians basically ARE the global space industry, with only a few minor exceptions

  14. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by flayzernax · · Score: 1

    Also see the wiki talk page for more debate about the articles in question.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:EmDrive

    "Can someone edit the analysis page, it was blatently written by someone who hasn't read either the New Scientist article or the more recent Eureka article. It doesn't violate either the conservation of momentum or energy, as it uses energy!

    Every article on it specifically states that when the equipment accelerates it loses thrust. If anyone would like to check, this happens with every form of propultion and just because it doesn't spew matter out of it doesn't make it reactionless."

  15. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by akboss · · Score: 2

    We dont want your unwashed masses, if we did we get them cheaper just over the border (or home depot). We do want all your businesses to relocate here sans employees (we will provide). Gun makers should move here too as the rest of you really dont want or need them but they are part of our heritage. I bet we could swing a deal and send say Houston to Detroit and you give us Ford.

    --
    "Remember, politicians and diapers should be changed often and for the same reason."
  16. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not develop this technology so everyone can use their microwaves and a copper cone to have a spaceport in their driveway?

    Yes indeed .. why not? That's one of those quintessential questions. It's like the question "Why aren't we all driving around in cars powered by Tesla's black box" or "Why are we still burning fossil fuels when the problem of abundant energy was solved nearly a hundred years ago" or "Why are we all working 40 hour weeks when there's enough automation to work 12 hour weeks" or "Why are we clinging to a dying monetary system that serves no purpose" or "Why do people starve to death on a daily basis when there's no need for it" or "What's causing the current global environmental changes" or "Why does religion have such an improperly powerful position in society" or "Why do people raising valid question get modded as trolls".

    Take the red pill.

  17. It's not our fault... by Nova+Express · · Score: 2

    ...that other states keep driving business out with higher taxes, more bureaucratic red tape, burdensome regulations, and corrupt closed shop union cronyism.

    This is why California keeps driving businesses to Texas.

    Also, Texas now ranks higher than California in standardized test scores, both in aggregate, and in each demographic ethnic group.

    For a more in-depth discussion of these points (with numerous statistics to back it up), see Chuck DeVore's The Texas Model: Prosperity in the Lone Star State and Lessons for America.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  18. First they make a Linux port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First they make a Linux port, and now a Texas space agency acquires them! Awesome! This should make for an excellent version of space invaders!

    1. Re:First they make a Linux port by crutchy · · Score: 1

      the texan patent lawyers will be all over that

  19. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 0

    How does one steal a business? Am I stealing your wife if I tell her that I won't beat her as much as you do and she comes to me?

  20. Underutilized spaceports by Animats · · Score: 2

    New Mexico already was screwed by Virgin Galactic on this. The state built Spaceport America for Virgin. Then Virgin demanded a better deal, and got it. Once in a while Armadillo Aerospace launches some test rocket from there. The terminal building is used for bus tours.

    1. Re:Underutilized spaceports by dywolf · · Score: 1

      to be honest, what were they thinking putting one in New Mexico in the first place? int he future, it might be a great spot. but right now? its too far from its theoretical customer base. and what were they thinking building it before they even had a businees plan/model to make money from? Spaceport America was a cool idea, but it lacked a lot of common sense.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    2. Re:Underutilized spaceports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to be honest, what were they thinking putting one in New Mexico in the first place?

      Proximity to White Sands Missile Range, for one thing. It's almost like you build spaceports in the middle of nowhere because once the rockets go up, if anything goes wrong, you do care where they come down.

    3. Re:Underutilized spaceports by dywolf · · Score: 1

      except virgin galactic doesnt use vertically launched rockets.
      they use a mothership that drop launches a reusable spaceplane.
      as such, they can launch from pretty much anywhere, and the need of a clear "ballistically downrange" area is unneeded.
      and again: they are in the middle of nowhere, many many miles away from the things and people they intend to serve. my other post covers it better, but Spaceport America is absolutely stupidly located. they need to be co-located with existing infrastructure until the industry is large enough in its own right to justify its own infrastructure supply lines.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  21. Singapore spaceport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are they gonna put that one?

    1. Re:Singapore spaceport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In India, duh.

  22. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 0

    Please do not reply to my insightful posts with your idiotic ramblings.

  23. Re:Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    virgin Galatic and all these other new space

    what corp is getting ready to take over heavy lifiting needs?

    spacex,

    lol just saying, all other corps look nice on paper, when you deliver sometthing let me know, 8)

  24. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, arrogant pride. That's surely going to persuade. After all, you just want the freedom to dictate conversation, and since your words are so much better than anybody else's, you truly deserve that power.

    Thanks for convincing me not to drink the Texas Tea.

    Maybe you should learn some humility.

  25. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

    After all, you just want the freedom to dictate conversation, and since your words are so much better than anybody else's, you truly deserve that power.

    Thank you for being so reasonable. Many of you carbetbagging yankees simply don't understand how precious my opinions are, but I respect you for being one of the few to admit it.

    Thanks for convincing me not to drink the Texas Tea.

    So long as you don't stop eating Texas beef stew or Texas pizza.

    Maybe you should learn some humility.

    You're right. I forgive you.

  26. Re:Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hour by inflex · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because if you want the money to flow back to the "masses" you better find something interesting for those "rich bastards" to spend it on, rather than having it stagnate in some bank account. Money is most effective when it is in use, lubricating the economy engine.

  27. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How beneficent of you, why truly your forgiveness is worth slightly less than a used roll of toilet paper.

  28. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

    A roll of used toilet paper? Who the hell took that much used toilet paper and reassembled it into a roll. Something only a yankee would think up, no doubt.

  29. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by crutchy · · Score: 1

    This drive is a scam and violates laws of physics.

    the laws of physics don't "govern" anything... they are merely generalized observations

    i'm not saying that they aren't useful; they can predict behavior under the limited conditions for which the laws were based

    you're just one of those sheeple who think because you read something in a physics book then it must be true

    there are probably more sheeple that think jesus walked on water and was the son of god because they read it in a book

    keep drinking the religious kool aid... fool

  30. Re:Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hour by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    (Line for the 10-mile-high club forms to the rear of the craft.)

    10 miles is only 52,800 feet, which isn't terribly high. Heck, a lot of airliners these days are pushing that regularly. 100 mile high, now...

  31. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by crutchy · · Score: 1

    do you think chuck norris should learn some humility too?

    *punches you*

  32. Re:Messing with Texas by crutchy · · Score: 2

    you forgot: shooting their guns till Old Age

  33. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Soluzar · · Score: 1

    Recycled, used... is there so much of a difference, ultimately?

  34. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

    The photon emission of that device can't possibly produce enough momentum to create the observed thrust. The device has not been tested in a vacuum chamber, and no, a hermetically sealed box full of air doesn't mean it wouldn't move (you can swim around in a closed box full of water, for example).

    You might also ask why it's got such off-kilter marketing. It's a bad thruster, but implied it would be great at levitating something that didn't accelerate? Why is that not the headline element - reactionlessly applying a force to something with just energy (i.e. pretty much an antigravity device).

  35. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not reaction-less. Energy goes in and thrust comes out. Its an open system. I've seen the argument that the microwave energy is moving close to the speed of light so it creates two frames of reference. I don't fully understand this. This invokes Einsteins special relativity.

    The simpler explanation I can see is like voyager having a thermal differential and getting radiation pressure to speed it up. This normally would not work, but since the microwaves travel near light speed it does in an enclosure because the two different sized ends act like different frames.

    Anyway this is just a theory as to why it works.

    Ever seen the mythbusters episode were they electrically ionize the air around wires to levitate a wire ring? People use to think that was fake to until it was figured out.

    I can't say the Emdrive is a known technology. But its worth investigating rather then just quoting some textbook physics and saying "impossible".

  36. Money Money Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Round the bowl, down the hole, go Tide go."

    XD

  37. New Mexico Spaceport? by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    Designed, built and operated by the New Mexico Spaceport Authority (NMSA), Spaceport America is nearing completion of the first phase of construction, which includes basic operational infrastructure such as an airfield, launch pads, terminal / hangar facility, emergency response capabilities, utilities and roadways

    Umm, there's already a spaceport under construction and really close to Texas.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:New Mexico Spaceport? by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      I know in America we suck at geography.... but New Mexico is on the west side of Texas. Houston in on the east. When I was little we would drive into Texas from Louisiana (east side) and the sign on I10 read "Welcome to Texas. Beaumont 25 miles. El Paso 890 miles." You might consider 890 miles pretty close, but I think it would be one heck of a commute...

    2. Re:New Mexico Spaceport? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      it's "really" close to the western tip of texas.....which puts it really far away from 99% of texas.

      it's also in an absolutely stupid location. it's as if no one did a feasibility study or anything. there is no nearby population center. there is no nearby logistical transportation lines (major freeway, freight railline, major airport, etc). its int he middle of freaking no where. who's going to use it? super rish, super bored people....and thats it.

      in order for a space port, spance-trans company to work realistically, at this time, in the infancy of the industry, they MUST integrate with the existing infrastructure and existing transportation industries.

      Spaceport America is the equivalent of trying to create the NASCAR race in the 1870s, before most people even heard of automobiles, let alone used them or apreciated them.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    3. Re:New Mexico Spaceport? by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      Actually, those were listed as the criteria for locating the spaceport there. It's far enough from population, and that's good when things go south.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    4. Re:New Mexico Spaceport? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      and thats the thing. i thnk those criteria are in error. a spaceport shouldnt be a facility for experiment, where those things are a thing to be worried about, anymore than airplanes are expected to crash at airports. and whats happened is its now too far away for anyone or anything to even try to use it, to even try to start a new industry.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  38. Re:Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hour by khallow · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why on earth does anyone need to travel to another part of the world any faster than a private jet can already do???

    Because sometimes really expensive shit needs to be done right now. Putting it off for a half a day or more can cost a lot of money. Maybe your boss needs to sign off in person on a big deal. Maybe you need a one of a kind part delivered to keep a critical system up.

    Whether there's enough of that sort of need to support a suborbital travel industry at this time is a big, unanswered question.

  39. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by khallow · · Score: 1

    We may not understand the math for this, but I am surprised some people out there haven't dumped a few thousand dollars into the tech to make it more efficient and powerful.

    The math for the EM drive doesn't work because it violates conservation of momentum. There's no lack of understanding here.

  40. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by khallow · · Score: 1

    It doesn't violate the conservation of momentum because it is speculated to be an OPEN SYSTEM.

    With no mechanism for coupling the EM drive to the rest of the universe. Hence, why it breaks conservation of momentum.

  41. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by khallow · · Score: 1

    i'm not saying that they aren't useful; they can predict behavior under the limited conditions for which the laws were based

    Those "limited conditions" happen to be all of reality. We have yet to observe any sort of phenomena that violates the basic conservation laws. If the EM Drive was a true violation of conservation of momentum, then we would have seen the effect elsewhere first. It's not the first combination of EM and general relativity, for example. Particle colliders would probably see the effect as well.

  42. Disneyland with tax money by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    A "_____"port is a transportation and commercial node - but there's no transport or commerce of note taking places at these "space"ports... just glorified amusement park rides. They're being built (with tax dollars) for no purpose other than allowing airport mangers and commissions and various state officials to brag about having a "space"port.

    1. Re:Disneyland with tax money by zwede · · Score: 1

      By that logic the Interstate highway system was a waste of tax money. After all, before the highways were built there weren't that many people travelling between states.

    2. Re:Disneyland with tax money by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Wow... Not only an apple to... God knows what, as "apples to oranges comparison" doesn't even begin to describe the blithering idiocy and ignorance of your reply.
       
      In the first place, a highway is a route connecting two destinations (which these 'ports' do not). Further, the Interstate Highway system was (originally) built for military purposes - commercial use was a distant secondary consideration. (Though it later came to dominate as the highway system became a pork barrel.)
       
      In the second place, yes, there were that many people (and plenty of goods) moving between the states. They moved via land on railroads and existing roads. They moved via water on canals, rivers, lakes, and coastwise shipping. They were even starting to move by air...

  43. wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steam has only just been finished on Linux, and now it will be used for Spaceport Development? This is great news, I hope that this new Spaceport will be very interesting! Furthermore, it appears that development is happening only in Texas, which I assume can only be a good thing! Does Valve have a special Spaceport-only development team deployed in Texas?

    Congratulations to Valve for their continued success!

  44. Yet Texas's(and others) government is complicit by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    While tax policy might provide an easy out if one of the states involved is California, replace it with a state not so far off the chart. The governments of these business-sycophantic states cannot create new businesses on their own but rely on other states to create and grow them. The mentality in these states is that if you do not own a business, you must be denied freedom.

    When a state government actively pursues businesses, they not only remove jobs from a state (usually with as much stealth as possible as to not alarm the public and block it then and there), they fail to generate the promised jobs in the new state, and most importantly fail to promote to workers that the new state is worth moving to for the long term (aside from few exceptions). This applies to any state that puts its living-in-the-flesh constitutents in a lower priority than those created of legal fictions.

    Individuals at fault? Not really.
    Governments to blame? Definitely.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  45. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's already had to do so. Though he wasn't half as senile crazy as Clint Eastwood.

  46. Re:Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hour by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Better be a pretty small part.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  47. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody can't seem to grasp that a used roll of toilet paper is...bare.

    I guess your ability to follow a metaphor is lower than I thought.

  48. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Texas has the 2nd largest population in the country (behind only California).
    Texas has the 2nd largest economy (again, behind California, and only slightly), larger than most independent countries.
    Texas is one of the few states that contributes more to the federal wallet than it recieves.
    Texas has a top notch education system that utilizes wealth redistribution (thats what it is even if not called that) ensures the poorest school districts still get adequate funding.
    On top of that it has many state run aid programs to put kids into college.
    Veterans who are Texas residents get a free ride through college.
    Texas has some of the healthiest residents int he nation, and one of the best healthcare netowrks
    Also, more hospitals per capita than any other state, and state programs to people who cant affords it.

    You can keep saying they're backward, but Texas is actually one of the most progressive states in teh nation, particularly for a "conservative" state (except its not really conservative; 45/55 split on votes, not very one sided).

    but what is clear, is that you're simply an ignorant moron who has never actually been there, and knows absolutely zero about the state.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  49. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used roll of toilet paper =/= Roll of used toilet paper.

    I think somebody has been staring into the sun too long.

  50. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by flayzernax · · Score: 1

    That's fine, I will not argue that. I will argue though that fire, the wheel, and a lot of chemistry was done without science as pseudoscience. Just because we don't fully understand something doesn't mean it cannot be harnessed and used and experimented on.

    To dismiss something because it doesn't fit our understanding and call it a scam is short sited. And frustrating to people who are curious.

    Anyway I thought I would be a smart ass and bring it up here. To see if I got any more informative replies, then it's impossible. Not that it's impossible is an invalid reply, but it was more or less already known as an answer ;p

    I'm not even sure we can bring in the conservation of momentum as an issue because of how it is claimed to work. I linked the page because anyone who's really interested in physics can go have a read of the pdfs and articles and decide if thats really the case. The wiki article calling it a scam and bringing up the conservation of momentum is biased and based on false information, thats why I linked the talk page.

    I understand that my lack of making a sound argument for all this without citations means I will mostly be ignored or flamed. And that is OK.

    Thanks for your time =)

  51. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Not to defend this drive or even enter into discussion on it, but...

    If the EM Drive was a true violation of conservation of momentum, then we would have seen the effect elsewhere first

    This statement is disingenuous. You could make it about every discovery.

  52. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Good to see that bigotry is alive and well on slashdot.

  53. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by khallow · · Score: 1

    To dismiss something because it doesn't fit our understanding and call it a scam is short sited. And frustrating to people who are curious.

    What "something"? There's no evidence or theoretical backing for the claim that the EM drive does anything. It's worth noting here that no one has seen a violation of conservation of momentum. Every such case where someone claims they have observed such turns to be observation error or fraud.

    I'm not even sure we can bring in the conservation of momentum as an issue because of how it is claimed to work.

    There's no mechanism by which momentum can be transferred from the system to the outside world, but the EM drive needs that in order to work.

  54. Re:Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hour by khallow · · Score: 1

    Better be a pretty small part.

    Sounds like any such suborbital transportation system would be moving several tons of payload at a time. It wouldn't have to be that small.

  55. Re:With all the stolen businesses from other state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's clear is that you're an apologist for Texas, providing a few bold claims about Texas, while papering over the negative sides.

    Notice no mention of anything like how Texas had to cover its budget deficits with Federal stimulus money. No mention of how Texas's Rick Perry went to California trying to poach businesses from the Golden State. No mention of how poor school districts in Texas are actually performing. No mention of the actual health of Texans (Texas is the 12th most Obese state in the nation and its sheer population means it has a lot of fat people) , or the problems with emergency rooms in Texas.

    You remind me of the Wingnuts to be discussed here:

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/01/1075007/-Wingnut-stereotyped-California-versus-wingnut-stereotyped-Texas

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/08/15/1007146/-Blue-California-s-Economy-vs-Red-Texas-Not-What-the-Conventional-Wisdom-Suggests

    Take out the oil business, an accident of geography, and Texas won't look so good at all.

  56. Great by PPH · · Score: 1

    Can we load all of Texas onto a rocket and send it to mars? One way?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  57. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by khallow · · Score: 1

    If the EM Drive was a true violation of conservation of momentum, then we would have seen the effect elsewhere first

    This statement is disingenuous. You could make it about every discovery.

    And you would typically be in error to do so. Particle colliders would be where a violation of the conservation of momentum would be seen first.

  58. Re:Houston to Singapore In As Little As Three Hour by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

    Suborbital also includes the recreational flights up and then back down to the same launch location.

    That Texas is going so hard for this business is interesting because New Mexico built a whole space port near White Sands just for Virgin Galactic and other enterprises - then the state legislature pretty much bungled it. VG has been talking about ducking out of their contract since NM hasn't met their obligations.

    With Texas going whole hog, it looks like "oops" for New Mexico...

  59. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

    It is reactionless. It does not use reaction mass (i.e. momentum) to produce thrust. This is a problem, because it violates conservation of momentum.

    That is what a reactionless drive is - for example, technically a car is a kind of reactionless drive, in the sense that it does not expel reaction mass to produce forward momentum. But a car conserves momentum because it pushes on the ground behind it.

    Textbook physics is textbook physics for a reason and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The people pushing the Emdrive have more then enough resources to produce this evidence, but have consistently failed to do so. The explanation for the Emdrive is not supported by current physics as is claimed. It is also not supported by anything you've said.

    Part of science is carefully considering our hypotheses so we don't waste resources. In a number of cases, the Emdrive has now been built (since it's just a microwave waveguide) but no experiment which does suitable controls for it has ever been produced.

    While I'm not of the crowd who believes the Emdrive's pushes are trying to scam anyone, they're not doing good science at the moment and I've not heard a suitable justification as to why we've never seen reduced pressure or no pressure results for operating the apparatus if they've been able to put one in a hermetically sealed box. I suspect, it's because you see exactly what you'd expect when you do - thrust decreases as you drop the pressure because the waveguide runs out of air to heat up.

  60. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by flayzernax · · Score: 1

    "What "something"? There's no evidence or theoretical backing for the claim that the EM drive does anything. It's worth noting here that no one has seen a violation of conservation of momentum. Every such case where someone claims they have observed such turns to be observation error or fraud."

    There is evidence, there's a video and a peer reviewed white paper translated to english.

    "There's no mechanism by which momentum can be transferred from the system to the outside world, but the EM drive needs that in order to work."

    What if it works differently then you suppose it could?

  61. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by flayzernax · · Score: 1

    This is the best response and I to wonder this same thing.

    I can't say that the drive is a scam flat out based on textbook physics though and thats mostly what I have been attempting to respond to.

  62. You seem to hail from an alternate dimension by Nova+Express · · Score: 1

    One where:

    Valero Energy Corporation
    Dell Computer Corporation
    Sysco
    Enterprise Products
    Plains All American Pipeline
    Tesoro
    etc.

    were never founded in Texas.

    And the rest of your post? [[Citation Needed]]

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  63. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by khallow · · Score: 1

    There is evidence, there's a video and a peer reviewed white paper translated to english.

    Evidence distinguishes between different hypotheses. These would exist whether they are right, wrong, or fraudulent.

    "There's no mechanism by which momentum can be transferred from the system to the outside world, but the EM drive needs that in order to work."

    What if it works differently then you suppose it could?

    Well, it can't work the way I "suppose" (which really is the way the EM drive creators suppose, I might add). So some degree of actually working would be an improvement.

    It's not too much to ask for such a claim that first, someone actually comes up with a working model that makes sense as well as a solid experimental demonstration. For example, that was done with Mach Lorentz Thrusters (MLT).

  64. No, just saw it happen between my state and GA. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The balance of my point still stands. Those kind of states rely on deceptively acquired businesses(proven through the actions of the Economic "Development" Board) while providing no substantial promotion for workers to move to a state with worse working conditions.

    The proof is in the types of jobs offered, the general hostility towards questioning business as well as the general Southern hostility to worker representation outside of employer-formed groups such as contractors and staffing agencies.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  65. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by tobia.conforto · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I can identify the sarcasm, if any, in your post.

    But would you care to elaborate on how, and I quote, "the problem of abundant energy was solved nearly a hundred years ago"?

  66. Re:Space ports are nice and all. by crutchy · · Score: 1

    Those "limited conditions" happen to be all of reality

    you must be the smartest person on earth if you can qualify that

    either that or you're a religious sheep and you really have no idea what goes on inside a black hole or the other side of the universe or whether string theory is correct or whether assumed conditions will remain the same forever or that there couldn't ever possibly be any exceptions

    there must be some good shit in that kool aid