Slashdot Mirror


3G and 4G USB Modems Are Security Threat, Black Hat Presenter Says

alphadogg writes "The vast majority of 3G and 4G USB modems handed out by mobile operators to their customers are manufactured by a handful of companies and run insecure software, according to two security researchers from Russia. Researchers Nikita Tarakanov and Oleg Kupreev analyzed the security of 3G/4G USB modems obtained from Russian operators for the past several months. Their findings were presented this week at the Black Hat Europe 2013 security conference in Amsterdam. Most 3G/4G modems used in Russia, Europe, and probably elsewhere in the world, are made by Chinese hardware manufacturers Huawei and ZTE, and are branded with the mobile operators' logos and trademarks, Tarakanov said. Because of this, even if the research was done primarily on Huawei modems from Russian operators, the results should be relevant in other parts of the world as well, he said."

50 comments

  1. Setuid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I did a small study on a few USB modems in the US. I found several setuid vulnerabilities and a lot of strange behavior that I didn't have the time or resources to fully analyze. You may feel safe on your personal hotspot but it does open a few potential openings if not mitigated.

    1. Re:Setuid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a ZTE mobile phone. When I plugged it into a windows XP system, the autorun file on the virtual NTFS memory card system, would reroute the PC routing tables so all internet traffic went through the mobile phone. On a Linux system, it would mess up the wi-fi system - traffic would just not get through even though the laptop was rebooted. This would continue for around 24 hours.

  2. No suprise here by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mandated backdoors aren't very well hidden. The only alternative for the authorities is to arrest the people who uncover them. Soon the 'blackhats' will have to meet in secret to protect themselves.

    Tarakanov said that they weren't able to test baseband attacks against the Qualcomm chips found inside the modems because it's illegal in Russia to operate your own GSM base station if you're not an intelligence agency or a telecom operator. "We'll probably have to move to another country for a few months to do it," he said.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:No suprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know.. AC here.. but I know Ericsson are performing tests on the Huawei / ZTE stuff in their labs with simulated and real GSM basestations.
      Sometimes under contract from those companies themselves, sometimes for security reasons..

      A couple of times the design specs Huawei sends to Ericsson when on contract are plagiarized right off their own stuff. Even so badly there are still Ericsson logos left over.

    2. Re:No suprise here by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh... Keep telling yourself this. It's less to do with what you're talking to and more of a licensing rules thing. Backdoors in GSM are already known and the "baseband" attacks these jokers allude to are actually as much bullshit as the "security risks" they're talking to on these devices.

      http://www.pittnerovi.com/jiri/hobby/electronics/gsm/index.html is there for your reading for starters. It has nothing to do with what you claim it to be- because if that were the case, it'd be illegal pretty much everywhere and it isn't.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:No suprise here by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      it'd be illegal pretty much everywhere and it isn't.

      Well, it's certainly not for the lack of trying... I would say it's pretty straight up

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:No suprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backdoors in GSM are already known and the "baseband" attacks these jokers allude to are actually as much bullshit as the "security risks" they're talking to on these devices.

      Isn't a security risk eh? Can I have a key to your house?

    5. Re:No suprise here by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well.. of course they could try to lobby for experimental license.
      because it's like that in pretty much every country in the world - it's a licensed spectrum.

      doesn't mean that you can't do development in most of the world on the networks. they could operate that network in a cage for example... that's how many of the bigger operators test devices.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:No suprise here by TitusGroan8856 · · Score: 1

      is it still illegal if you do it inside a Faraday cage where it can't be detected and cannot interfere with legitimate signals?

    7. Re:No suprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get a basestation test set form someone like Rohde & Schwarz etc. and connect the modem via a cable, standard equipment for anyone doing baseband development

  3. So it's a "security threat"... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    ...for the owner of a piece of hardware to be able to reprogram it?

    I suppose it is, when the owner is running Windows.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:So it's a "security threat"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The researchers also found a possible mass attack vector. Once installed on a computer, the modem application -- at least the one from Huawei -- checks periodically for updates from a single server, Tarakanov said. Software branded for a specific operator searchers for updates in a server directory specific to that operator.

      An attacker who manages to compromise this update server, can launch mass attacks against users from many operators, Tarakanov said. Huawei 3G modems from several different Russian operators used the same server, but there might be other update servers for other countries, he said.

    2. Re:So it's a "security threat"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It would be a whole lot easier than that. Just a little DNS poisoning or a rogue DNS server and spoofing the update server directory structure. Poof! Instant zombie army. No phishing required.

    3. Re:So it's a "security threat"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An attacker who manages to compromise this update server, can launch mass attacks against users from many operators

      This attack is possible for any kind of software that uses an update server.

    4. Re:So it's a "security threat"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not where there is sufficient code signing and transport encryption

  4. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modem modulates YOU!

  5. Security Threat? by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously... I'm beginning to wonder about the quality of presentations at Black Hat if this was even there .

    The modems themselves aren't a threat. It's the fact that many of them cart around drivers and "manager" applications which could provide storage based attack vectors or through compromised versions of the driver or manager that you have any problems... Unsurprising and already well known by most security researchers.

    1) For many of those "security threat" modems, Linux works wonders as does *BSD as they support the devices out of box with OS provided support.
    2) There's a panopoly of devices that don't expose the machines to any of these vectors that runs $50-150 provided by vendors such as Zoom and Cradlepoint (in fact, it's what I use since it allows the LTE dongle (that doesn't have these "risks" by the way...) be able to switch between 3G and 4G seamlessly (Linux supports both, but NetworkManager doesn't support switching gears between the differing ways both modes are accessed yet...). The devices either have their own battery or not but allow multiple (more than a MiFi type device does...) devices on the connection.
    3) If you're wanting something with a few less moving parts and slightly more compact, you can always get a MiFi (which is what the Telcos are now leaning towards because it allows things like your Nook or Kindle to link up to the Internet as well as your notebook...).

    I'd be ashamed of myself if I were to try to have ran this "issue" up the flagpole at BlackHat or DEFCON. Really, guys?

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Security Threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > The modems themselves aren't a threat. It's the fact that many of them cart around drivers and "manager" applications

      Right. Guns aren't the threat, it's *triggers* that are the threat. If they just didn't come with triggers, we'd all be safe. This is already known by most gun users.

      Black Hat is not just for "l33t haxorz trix" to show off to the other "l33t haxoz" It's also fun to see just how widespread a problem, to see if it's a genuine and widespread threat, and to educate people who haven't explored every nook or cranny of security issues of some of the more interesting issues. This is a good one: there are very few manufacturers, their security practices are poor, the devices have become ubiquitous. A good test of the extent, and level of thtreat, of such commodity hardware is a *great* BlackHat topic.

      And that Zoom LTE devices are crap. The one I tested was fragile, the dongle connector breaks if you breathe on it, and the bundle of software with it is useless. And having ones own battery is not the point, the Windows interfaces to manage it don't work with the most recent Cisco VPN tools, and oh yes as you said, it doesn't work well under NetworkManager, and Zoom and my local computer store tried to play "returns are not my problem" ping pong. Buying "secure" hardware that doesn't work right is not a solution to anyone's security problem.

    2. Re:Security Threat? by Phizzle · · Score: 1

      2) There's a panopoly of devices that don't expose the machines to any of these vectors that runs $50-150 provided by vendors such as Zoom and Cradlepoint (in fact, it's what I use since it allows the LTE dongle (that doesn't have these "risks" by the way...) be able to switch between 3G and 4G seamlessly (Linux supports both, but NetworkManager doesn't support switching gears between the differing ways both modes are accessed yet...). The devices either have their own battery or not but allow multiple (more than a MiFi type device does...) devices on the connection.

      Svartalf, what device are you using? Thanks!!

      --
      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  6. Re:Windoze is the only operating system in the wor by rubycodez · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    in round numbers it's the only consumer operating system laptops use, 93% of the global market. and the other 7% *isn't* mostly linux and open source bsd....

  7. academic by alienzed · · Score: 1

    yeah, all those 'universities' will have to pretend they aren't studying security and privacy in modern technology....

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  8. Application-based firewall by arisvega · · Score: 1

    .. so the 3/4G modem software cannot connect to that Chinese IP during startup.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    1. Re:Application-based firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      methinks you don't understand driver models

      [ WIRE ] [ DEVICE ] [ DRIVER ] [KERNEL] [FIREWALL] [APPLICATION]

      sometimes firewall and kernel have swapped location depending on OS

  9. Misleading Headline (go figure, its slashdot) by utkonos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The 3G and 4G products here in the US are made by Samsung, Novatel, Sierra Wireless, and others. None that I could find were made by Chinese manufacturers Huawei and ZTE.

    This article only applies to Russia where those things are even available. Headline should read "Russian Mobile Providers' 3G and 4G USB Modems Are Security Threat, Black Hat Presenter Says"

    But with that headline, nobody would care or read the article.

    1. Re:Misleading Headline (go figure, its slashdot) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that in Europe, the Huawei modems are very common. I've got four myself, from four different ISP's...

    2. Re:Misleading Headline (go figure, its slashdot) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Estonia (Europe as well) pretty much all 3G modems I have seen are Huawei's.

    3. Re:Misleading Headline (go figure, its slashdot) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing here in Finland. Greetings to Estonia, our southern strong little brother.

    4. Re:Misleading Headline (go figure, its slashdot) by m00j · · Score: 2

      Here in Australia Huawei and ZTE modems seem to be the only thing available from the majority of providers. Certainly the three major carriers have them (or did six months ago when I last looked), and I haven't seen a non-Huawei or ZTE modem from any of the MVNO.

      Perhaps because in the USA you have different frequency bands?

    5. Re:Misleading Headline (go figure, its slashdot) by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

      here in Scotland, I always have a handful of Huawei USB 3g modems. Useful for home-office broadband as a backup (plugs directly into the Vigor Draytek router); I have one in a battery backed portable wifi hotspot (which is great for camping or whilst on the road) and usually a few in my bag when I'm out on client site. I use them with Fedora Linux; they work very well out of the box through networkmanager.

      Top tip, use an external antenna and you'll get much better performance.

  10. Re:Windoze is the only operating system in the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can disable the cdrom emulation using QPST pretty easily and use native Windows Tools to dial (And not have to hack about ejecting the cdrom). (ZTE / Huawei doesn't seem to matter they are all qualcomm iirc it is slightly more annoying to enter diag mode on a Huawei but like maybe 5 mins more effort in total.

  11. Search harder by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 4, Informative

    ZTE and Huawei products are in fact for sale in the USA and Europe as well. I don't know about South America, but I presume you can get them there as well. Maybe the major US telco's don't bundle ZTE or Huawei products with their 3G/4G offerings, but the hardware is for sale for certain. Several EU operators (notably Vodafone) bundle these products. Assuming that because you don't see the products in the USA they are only available in Russia is kind of short sighted, the world is more than just Russia and the bundled hardware you get in the USA, you know?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Search harder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-Mobile and 3 in the UK also use ZTE and Huawei modems. Huawei's E160 is still pretty common, for instance.

  12. Evil modeswitching USB modems by Compaqt · · Score: 2

    Would this be the right place to complain about evil modeswitching USB modems?

    Used to be when you got a piece of hardware, you'd get a CD with the drivers on it. Later on, somebody got the idea to include USB modem drivers right on the device itself, since it's USB anyway.

    The way they implement this is to make the device into a USB Storage Device upon bootup. Then, depending on circumstances, it switches the mode to a USB modem.

    This is evil because the protocol isn't totally well defined, and it usually works well only on a particular version of Windows.

    Linux tries to cope, but it doesn't always work.

    The article which is the subject of this thread just seems to confirm that these companies just make it up as they go along, and then pump out millions of copies of the same thing.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Evil modeswitching USB modems by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      hmmh? the way the dongles I used couple of years worked as both at the same time(as a modem and as a drive).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Evil modeswitching USB modems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's why apps like usb_modeswitch exist.

    3. Re:Evil modeswitching USB modems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to hear about the problems, but I'm sure that the one who designed that feature did it with good intentions after all.

    4. Re:Evil modeswitching USB modems by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      I haven't had any issue with Huawei and ZTE dongles from 2006-today on Ubuntu 1204.

      I support these dongles in my weekemd work @ a major ISP. Our lab has a Ubuntu machine.

      (No official Linux support AFAIK, which is weird, because all our issues are Win/Mac which both struggle with these. I've had Linux calls but that's usually to ask whether it's necessary to use the ISP software.)

  13. If firmware is part of the threat... by Burz · · Score: 1

    then one could still consider the device to be a security risk. Even Linux tends to use many vendor-supplied firmwares.

    Operating the devices under Qubes OS would help greatly in reducing the risk: It can use IOMMU (if present) to operate questionable hardware and drivers within VMs and even has a GUI for managing this.

    1. Re:If firmware is part of the threat... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Linux can use the IOMMU, too. Problem is, practically nobody has a usable one, for which you need both proper CPU and chipset support. The chipsets and CPUs which have working implementations have only recently become popular. It's going to be a while before this is a reasonable suggestion for anyone. It will be nice, though. It's staggering that we haven't had them all along.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:If firmware is part of the threat... by Burz · · Score: 1

      People who are interested in security won't stop at buying just software to get it. And the hardware isn't all that hard to come by anyway; just make sure the system has Intel sandy bridge or newer and also supports vPro.

      You can get the capability with AMD systems, but they are harder to come by (atthough Wikipedia is at least one place with a guide to AMD systems that support IOMMU).

    3. Re:If firmware is part of the threat... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      People who are interested in security won't stop at buying just software to get it. And the hardware isn't all that hard to come by anyway; just make sure the system has Intel sandy bridge or newer and also supports vPro.

      When reading up on this issue I discovered that my CPU has an IOMMU (Phenom II X6) but my motherboard has no support due to the chipset. If the situation is more straightforward on intel, more power to them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Any Ethernet Versions? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I don't really care if they spy on my modem, but I don't want their paws inside my hardware. Are there any ethernet-connected devices? I've seen some WiFi-based ones, which should be fine, but it overly complicates the matter and adds additional power requirements which wouldn't be useful.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Any Ethernet Versions? by geirlk · · Score: 1

      I have this one: http://dx.com/p/hame-mpr-a1-wifi-802-11b-g-n-wireless-3g-router-white-green-127771

      It's the router equivalent of a swiss army knife.

      Haven't tried it with any LTE USB stick yet, but I can't see why that shouldn't work.
      In a pinch, you can even use it to charge your phone.

      You can insert a eg. 3G stick, and access it via wifi, eth or usb (allthough, isn't usb a bit redundant?).

      A bit cheap-ish build, but hey, it works!

  15. You did if you had SPARC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got sun hardware from the early to mid 90s and it ALL had IOMMUs in it. I'm not sure how they compare feature-wise to the modern implementations, but you could segregate each IO device into it's own address space in order to avoid one device taking out the system.

  16. Where's The Actual Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other topics from the conference have posted their materials:
    https://www.blackhat.com/eu-13/archives.html

    I don't see any materials for this presentation. Does any body have the link to the actual paper/results/research?

  17. insecure software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is what i have in my pants