Slashdot Mirror


Targeted Attack Campaign Uses Android Malware

Trailrunner7 writes "Android attacks have become all the rage in the last year or two, and targeted attacks against political activists in Tibet, Iran and other countries have been bubbling up to the surface more and more often. Now, those two trends have converged with the discovery of a targeted attack campaign that's going after Tibetan and Uyghur activists with a spear-phishing message containing a malicious APK file. Researchers say the attack appears to be coming from Chinese sources. The new campaign began a few days ago when unknown attackers were able to compromise the email account of a well-known Tibetan activist. The attackers then used that account to begin sending a series of spear-phishing messages to other activists in the victim's contact list. One of the messages referred to a human rights conference in Geneva in March, using the recipients' legitimate interest in the conference as bait to get them to open the attachment. The malicious attachment in the emails is named 'WUC's Conference.apk.'"

74 comments

  1. Just use a custom hosts file that blocks malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    $10,000 CHALLENGE to Alexander Peter Kowalski

    * POOR SHOWING TROLLS, & most especially IF that's the "best you've got" - apparently, it is... lol!

    Hello, and THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING !! We have a Major Problem, HOST file is Cubic Opposites, 2 Major Corners & 2 Minor. NOT taught Evil DNS hijacking, which VOIDS computers. Seek Wisdom of MyCleanPC - or you die evil.

    Your HOSTS file claimed to have created a single DNS resolver. I offer absolute proof that I have created 4 simultaneous DNS servers within a single rotation of .org TLD. You worship "Bill Gates", equating you to a "singularity bastard". Why do you worship a queer -1 Troll? Are you content as a singularity troll?

    Evil HOSTS file Believers refuse to acknowledge 4 corner DNS resolving simultaneously around 4 quadrant created Internet - in only 1 root server, voiding the HOSTS file. You worship Microsoft impostor guised by educators as 1 god.

    If you would acknowledge simple existing math proof that 4 harmonic Slashdots rotate simultaneously around squared equator and cubed Internet, proving 4 Days, Not HOSTS file! That exists only as anti-side. This page you see - cannot exist without its anti-side existence, as +0- moderation. Add +0- as One = nothing.

    I will give $10,000.00 to frost pister who can disprove MyCleanPC. Evil crapflooders ignore this as a challenge would indict them.

    Alex Kowalski has no Truth to think with, they accept any crap they are told to think. You are enslaved by /etc/hosts, as if domesticated animal. A school or educator who does not teach students MyCleanPC Principle, is a death threat to youth, therefore stupid and evil - begetting stupid students. How can you trust stupid PR shills who lie to you? Can't lose the $10,000.00, they cowardly ignore me. Stupid professors threaten Nature and Interwebs with word lies.

    Humans fear to know natures simultaneous +4 Insightful +4 Informative +4 Funny +4 Underrated harmonic SLASHDOT creation for it debunks false trolls. Test Your HOSTS file. MyCleanPC cannot harm a File of Truth, but will delete fakes. Fake HOSTS files refuse test.

    I offer evil ass Slashdot trolls $10,000.00 to disprove MyCleanPC Creation Principle. Rob Malda and Cowboy Neal have banned MyCleanPC as "Forbidden Truth Knowledge" for they cannot allow it to become known to their students. You are stupid and evil about the Internet's top and bottom, front and back and it's 2 sides. Most everything created has these Cube like values.

    If Natalie Portman is not measurable, hot grits are Fictitious. Without MyCleanPC, HOSTS file is Fictitious. Anyone saying that Natalie and her Jewish father had something to do with my Internets, is a damn evil liar. IN addition to your best arsware not overtaking my work in terms of popularity, on that same site with same submission date no less, that I told Kathleen Malda how to correct her blatant, fundamental, HUGE errors in Coolmon ('uncoolmon') of not checking for performance counters being present when his program started!

    You can see my dilemma. What if this is merely a ruse by an APK impostor to try and get people to delete APK's messages, perhaps all over the web? I can't be a party to such an event! My involvement with APK began at a very late stage in the game. While APK has made a career of trolling popular online forums since at least the year 2000 (newsgroups and IRC channels before that)- my involvement with APK did not begin until early 2005 . OSY is one of the many forums that APK once frequented before the sane people there grew tired of his garbage and banned him. APK was banned from OSY back in 2001. 3.5 years after his banning he begins to send a variety of abusiv

  2. Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Cue the Fandroid apologists.

    1. Re:Lol by CodeReign · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cue the Fandroid apologists.

      Phandroid checking in.

      Shit can't be fixed if the vendor is shit. Get a Nexus device and always have a secure fucking awesome device.

    2. Re:Lol by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No apologies here. If someone is stupid enough to install a program they receive in email and they weren't expecting one? C'mon!

      I'd still rather be able to choose what I want to install than to have the maker and/or seller of the device make those decisions for me.

    3. Re:Lol by Nerdfest · · Score: 0

      Sure it can, you can take all of the users rights and abilities to choose what software they can install. Apparently some people need that and are willing to sacrifice truly owning their own hardware to get it. Strangely, most of them are proud of it too.

    4. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non sequiturs are insightful? How would have running a Nexus device have stopped this?

    5. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuppe666 should be here shortly to meet your needs.

    6. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can Nexus access/get updates from the Google store in SE Asia?

      Because it can't in China. So you don't get a secure fucking awesome device.

    7. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      It's always amazing how butthurt Fandroids get over someone choosing to use another mobile OS. The condescension and attempts at trying to paint themselves as superior highlight how little life and how insecure they are.

    8. Re:Lol by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If someone is stupid enough to install a program they receive in email and they weren't expecting one? C'mon!

      It's called spear phishing. Where instead of blasting a million messages to everyone at random, you send a very plausible message to someone who ought to know the sender.

      Basically, what happened here is someone hacked an activiist's email account, and used it to send a plausible looking message to their contacts, like say, something about an upcoming human rights conference. The recipient sees it's from someone they trust and the message is appropriate to their relationship (i.e., it came from a human rights activist and is about a human rights conference).

      Yes, you probably should not be clicking links from anyone, even those of your trusted friends and relatives, but for most people, they believe it's authentic. Hell, the RSA hack happened the same way - a faked email coming from the hiriing company RSA uses went to the HR coordinator claiming to be a list of new hires.

    9. Re:Lol by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      The whole point of Android is freedom, as in secure your own shit as much as you want freedom, if you can't handle it I believe they make iOS for those people. Till them most of android's security apps come from the community / vendors.

      Then again, these guys installed APK files they got in their email, there is little to no hope there, most ppl don't know what an apk file is much less whether to click on it. Solution? Treat APKs as .exe , which email providers block for the very reason listed in this article, problem solved.

    10. Re:Lol by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Can Nexus access/get updates from the Google store in SE Asia?

      Yes, with the exception of Burma/Myanmar. Movies, Books, Music, and buying the device directly from Google Play are restricted to a small handful of Western countries, but Apps and Updates are available pretty much everywhere (except China and countries under embargo by US).

    11. Re:Lol by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah but it sucks if the fucker I just emailed got pwned on his android and now the chinese govmt is all up in my business. fact: the android ecosystem is insecure. If an android phone touches your virtual sphere, it is a disease vector.

    12. Re:Lol by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      Phishing is not a flaw in the software - it's a flaw in the human that's using the software. PEBKAC, if you will (metaphorically of course).

      Coming from a disillusioned Android user who's hoping to switch to FirefoxOS when possible.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    13. Re:Lol by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      No....

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    14. Re:Lol by elashish14 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's still no excuse. YOU DO NOT OPEN ATTACHMENTS THAT YOU ARE NOT EXPECTING. It doesn't matter who the source is. Anyone could get hacked. Even if the source is someone you trust, but the message seems out of the blue and not something you expect, you get back in touch with them and ask if they sent it. Just because the message seems authentic doesn't mean that it is. It's still your fault as the user for trusting something that you shouldn't.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    15. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      What an idiotic argument. Did you even read the email sample? The problem here is precisely that the message is quite ordinary and of interest to the targeted users.

    16. Re:Lol by smash · · Score: 1

      So when this is considered best practice on Windows its a horrible security problem, but when it's considered best practice on android it's no big deal?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    17. Re:Lol by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

      that's fine, just don't text/email/call me from your android, so i can be sure I'm safe.

    18. Re:Lol by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      In case you failed to read my post somehow let me restate it for you: Android is as secure as you make it. Now go read some books or something.

    19. Re:Lol by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      that's the whole issue. Even if my android is secure, if somebody else's android is pwned then I can get screwed as well: Voice - the other android's voice call is being recoreded/processed, grabs my credit card #, SSN, or other info. Text: the other android is compromisded, sends me a text that appears to be from a friend. Email: same as text. In short, My security is at risk whenever I connect with somebody else using Android. My iPhone is really good at identifying which of my contacts has an iPhone vs. other, so this is a layer of added security for iOS.

    20. Re:Lol by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      so... when your friend sends you an apk file w/o prior notice... does that not strike you as the least bit odd?

      And... do you realize in regards to phishing / spear phishing that both Android and iOS are equally vulnerable to it? Apple just likes to keep the blind fold on its customers while it collects their anatomical sizes.

    21. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No surprise at all. Some people actually WANT to replicate the cesspool of problems Windows had into the mobile future. Most people (almost nobody here) just wants it to work.

  3. Harvests info by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Android App harvests information (contacts, SMS messages, location, SIM data) and reports it back only when ordered to by the reception of a SMS message command. The location is particularly troubling because they can just keep pinging the phone to track the individual in real-time, then who knows what could happen next.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Harvests info by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      So you're saying this isn't a "malware" problem so much as it is a "Chinese government hacking dissidents phones to try to find other people to throw in jail for political speech."

    2. Re:Harvests info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what you aren't saying is "our country does the exact same fucking thing."

      I wonder is that out of ignorance or fear?

    3. Re:Harvests info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume by "our" you're referring to European countries and their speech laws.

    4. Re:Harvests info by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's your point? I can't criticize one government for something if the government where I live does anything similar?

      Or are you pushing a straw man argument here, that I was suggesting the US government didn't do anything like that?

      Honestly, fuck off. Bad government is bad government, no matter if my government is the same or worse.

  4. Trust No One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Any communication method you use can and will be compromised.

    1. Re:Trust No One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My tins cans and string solution is very secure.

    2. Re:Trust No One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like you haven't noticed my tapping wire... (although I have to say, there's quite some noise on that signal)

  5. Need more Yak's Milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Why do Tibetans even HAVE smart phones?

  6. Superior Unix Architecture? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whatever happened to the folks who claimed in +5 insightful posts that Linux has better security because of the superior Unix architecture? And that Windows malware, spyware, viruses and etc. were because of the crappy Windows code and not just because of popularity?

    As Macs grow more popular, so does the malware targeting it. And Android has a huge malware problem. Perhaps those posts were wrong?

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by schitso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Regardless of the system, an incompetent privileged user is always going to be a vulnerability.

    2. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Android actually Unix like?, It only has a non mainline Linux kernel, not regular GNU/Linux.

    3. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Superior Unix Architecture is running a JVM, and the .apk file is operating under that virtual machine.

      If you take a great looking, brand new pickup truck and hitch it to a full manure spreader, it's still going to stink.

    4. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Threni · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone is saying:

      1) it's impossible to write a layer of abstraction above Linux, and
      2) for that system to support the installation of software outside of the control of the vendor of that layer of abstraction, and
      3) for that software to potentially perform some action the user isn't aware of

    5. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      And that Windows malware, spyware, viruses and etc. were because of the crappy Windows code and not just because of popularity?

      Microsoft isn't off the hook by any means.

      There are still several orders of magnitude more malware for Windows than any other platform, despite Android overtaking it in the market. Android malware is also almost exclusively socially engineered, rather than exploiting OS flaws. The same can't be said for Windows.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      Windows being crappy code isn't the only complaint by any means. The fact that it is locked down so the user doesn't have control is as big a complaint. Having to hack your phone to gain control is a perfect example of lack of control.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    7. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Windows has a bigger install base than Android, and PCs are far more lucrative target than a weak phone with a weak data connection.

      Android malware is also almost exclusively socially engineered, rather than exploiting OS flaws. The same can't be said for Windows.

      What OS flaws? Reference? The vast majority of Windows malware is through downloads, like fake codecs.

      --
      This space for rent.
    8. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows has a bigger install base than Android, and PCs are far more lucrative target than a weak phone with a weak data connection.

      Android will overtake Windows installed base in just a couple of years. Even now, there are not several orders of magnitude more Windows machines than Android.

      What OS flaws? Reference?

      http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=malware+windows+vulnerability

    9. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      It's worth pointing out that Android does everything right. By default "unknown sources" is disabled, so the user has to go and turn that on and see the warning. Then when they for install it tells them that the apple will know where they are, read their contacts, read SMS messages etc. Really if you are dumb enough to fall for this, especially when you know people are out to get you and basic online safety says don't install stuff from attachments then it's your own fault, not Android.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by smash · · Score: 1

      It depends on the context. If we are counting end user Linux installs on slashdot, yes. If we are counting security vulnerabilities, no.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    11. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Android does not everything right. You can not revoke application rights without uninstalling it. There is no way for application to mark privileges optional. There is no way for the user to know whether app needs contact list or internet access only for legitimate things or not. Basically, android security is all or nothing proposition with android store containing malware and spyware all too often.

      As it is now, even legitimate applications ask for dangerous privileges cause they need to have that one tiny feature only subset of users need. There is simply no way to distinguish between legitimate and non legitimate apps. So most people end up in one in two states: download everything or download nothing. One is unsafe and other makes your smart phone as good as dumb phone.

    12. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by wolverine2k · · Score: 0

      Permissions Pro is the apk for you :)

    13. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the system, an incompetent privileged user is always going to be a vulnerability.

      And that's why the malware problem on Android is so bad - the users are more incompetent than the iOS users.

    14. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by schitso · · Score: 1

      You almost had me. Happy April Fools Day to you, too.

  7. chinese culture itself is corrupt and poisonous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is no concept of the worth of an individual. A person is only worth as much as he can be used by his rulers. Anyone who isn't enthusiastically supporting the rulers is considered subhuman to be disposed of like any other vermin.

    I really hope the US has a doomsday satellite in orbit because better humanity be wiped out that be subject to chinese rule.

  8. Re:Just use a custom hosts file that blocks malwar by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wrong APK :)

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  9. Dealing with incompetent device owner by tepples · · Score: 0

    Then what's the solution when the median device owner has proven incompetent? Take away privilege from the general public and sell it back to interested adults for an annual fee? That's what Apple does on iOS.

    1. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by LDAPMAN · · Score: 2

      Exactly right! That is the solution. To be able to do what you like you need $99/yr and enough knowledge to run Xcode. I think it's a pretty good solution.

    2. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by schitso · · Score: 2

      Er, no? How about take away the privilege by default, and require that the user enable the ability install potentially insecure apps? Those of us who are responsible with our devices shouldn't have to pay the maker of our preferred OS to toggle a setting.

    3. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... yeah, don't you need to buy a Mac as well? I think a check box in the settings works perfectly fine.

    4. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      There is no solution for stupidity. You accept that it will happen, try to mitigate it as best you can, and you move on. It's still not worth giving up your rights over.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    5. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      ... yeah, don't you need to buy a Mac as well? I think a check box in the settings works perfectly fine.

      I'm sympathetic to the idea that it might be useful to make it a bit more difficult, like downloading a free app with the checkbox in, or executing an adb command. But it's ridiculous to expect the user to spend any amount of money to control their own device.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Targeted Phone Attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember 1996 when the mossad used an exploding cell phone to attack a Hamas bomb maker. 'That you Yahya? Bubbye. Kaboom!'

    Now I read about this Android "attack" I can't help but think that you nerds are just pathetic. Seriously pathetic!

    Captcha reads : Pansies. How prescient of it.

    1. Re:Targeted Phone Attacks by cavreader · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Before cellular phones existed the Israelis targeted one of the people responsible for the Munich Olympic killings using a good ole fashion public phone. Technology marches on but usually the end result remains basically the same.

  11. Free Tibet, but not Uyghurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am all for Tibet becoming independent of China. However, for Xinxiang and any other Uyghur lands, I don't. The Tibetans would happily settle down in peace (sorta like Bhutan) if made independent and left alone. The Uyghurs would probably try and enable Jihad in the neighboring Soviet '-stans' with the goal of getting a greater Turkestan made up of the Soviet '-stans' and Xinxiang, and gang up with Turkey for bigger Jihads

    1. Re:Free Tibet, but not Uyghurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Well put and explained.

    2. Re:Free Tibet, but not Uyghurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gang up with Turkey? Or gang up against Turkey? Turkey is one of the most secular Muslim majority states.

  12. Learn the TRUTH about host files... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Mainly in efficiency - it runs in Ring 0/RPL 0/PnP Kernelmode (on Windows), as merely a filter for the IP stack (no overheads of more driver layers OR browser level slower less efficient addons):

    21++ ADVANTAGES OF CUSTOM HOSTS FILES (how/what/when/where/why):

    Over AdBlock & DNS Servers ALONE 4 Security, Speed, Reliability, & Anonymity (to an extent vs. DNSBL's + DNS request logs).

    1.) HOSTS files are useable for all these purposes because they are present on all Operating Systems that have a BSD based IP stack (even ANDROID) and do adblocking for ANY webbrowser, email program, etc. (any webbound program). A truly "multi-platform" UNIVERSAL solution for added speed, security, reliability, & even anonymity to an extent (vs. DNS request logs + DNSBL's you feel are unjust hosts get you past/around).

    2.) Adblock blocks ads? Well, not anymore & certainly not as well by default, apparently, lol - see below:

    Adblock Plus To Offer 'Acceptable Ads' Option

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/12/12/2213233/adblock-plus-to-offer-acceptable-ads-option [slashdot.org] )

    AND, in only browsers & their subprogram families (ala email like Thunderbird for FireFox/Mozilla products (use same gecko & xulrunner engines)), but not all, or, all independent email clients, like Outlook, Outlook Express, OR Window "LIVE" mail (for example(s)) - there's many more like EUDORA & others I've used over time that AdBlock just DOES NOT COVER... period.

    Disclaimer: Opera now also has an AdBlock addon (now that Opera has addons above widgets), but I am not certain the same people make it as they do for FF or Chrome etc..

    3.) Adblock doesn't protect email programs external to FF (non-mozilla/gecko engine based) family based wares, So AdBlock doesn't protect email programs like Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows "LIVE" mail & others like them (EUDORA etc./et al), Hosts files do. THIS IS GOOD VS. SPAM MAIL or MAILS THAT BEAR MALICIOUS SCRIPT, or, THAT POINT TO MALICIOUS SCRIPT VIA URLS etc.

    4.) Adblock won't get you to your favorite sites if a DNS server goes down or is DNS-poisoned, hosts will (this leads to points 5-7 next below).

    5.) Adblock doesn't allow you to hardcode in your favorite websites into it so you don't make DNS server calls and so you can avoid tracking by DNS request logs, OR make you reach them faster since you resolve host-domain names LOCALLY w/ hosts out of cached memory, hosts do ALL of those things (DNS servers are also being abused by the Chinese lately and by the Kaminsky flaw -> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/082908-kaminsky-flaw-prompts-dns-server.html [networkworld.com] for years now). Hosts protect against those problems via hardcodes of your fav sites (you should verify against the TLD that does nothing but cache IPAddress-to-domainname/hostname resolutions (in-addr.arpa) via NSLOOKUP, PINGS (ping -a in Windows), &/or WHOIS though, regularly, so you have the correct IP & it's current)).

    * NOW - Some folks MAY think that putting an IP address alone into your browser's address bar will be enough, so why bother with HOSTS, right? WRONG - Putting IP address in your browser won't always work IS WHY. Some IP adresses host several domains & need the site name to give you the right page you're after is why. So for some sites only the HOSTS file option will work!

    6.) Hosts files don't eat up CPU cycles (or ELECTRICITY) like AdBlock does while it parses a webpages' content, nor as much as a DNS server does while it runs. HOSTS file are merely a FILTER for the kernel mode/PnP TCP/IP subsystem, which runs FAR FASTER & MORE EFFICIENTLY than any ring 3/rpl3/usermode app can since hosts files run in MORE EFFICIENT & FAS

    1. Re:Learn the TRUTH about host files... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol => real APK is "longer" than fake APK. I guess we know how the "bitch" is!!

  13. I feel like helping you by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you want, I can provide you some space on my web server so that you don't have to copy and paste your promotion of hosts files like that. Reply here if interested.

  14. Can't Help by tuppe666 · · Score: 0

    Tuppe666 should be here shortly to meet your needs.

    I'd love to to I am just running through my daily ceremony of eating each of Androids codenames, which I do three times[On friday I fast to remind myself of less fortunate Operating Systems], followed by bathing and chanting the words "smarter mobile devices that are more aware of its owner's location and preferences". Then I do the holy "status bar emptying"....The daily cleansing of the internet doesn't start for hours.

  15. FUCK RED CHINA!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Long live His Holiness the Dalai Lama!!

    Fuck these immoral, violent, thieving slopeheads.

  16. Malicious APK spear-phishing malware .. by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    "Android attacks have become all the rage"

    Except a user tricked into downloading and installing malware from some third party location, in no way shape or form, relates to Android security !

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Malicious APK spear-phishing malware .. by smash · · Score: 1

      Just like Java exploits requiring the user to type their administrative credentials in relate to Windows or OS X security.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  17. User installed malware and Unix architecture? by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    "Whatever happened to the folks who claimed in +5 insightful posts that Linux has better security because of the superior Unix architecture?

    What has the actions of some user in installing malware got to do with the security of the architecture?

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:User installed malware and Unix architecture? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      More to the point, this has nothing to do with Linux security. The kernel is not being compromised in this exploit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Stand up for a Free Tibet, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The is a lot of misguided white noise post here, which misses the heart of the matter.

    Tibet was invaded and occupied by China in 1949. China/CCP is still trying to convince the world that Tibet is part of China and politically is winning this battle. But "the resistance," ongoing. These attacks are aimed at the resistance.

    @ erroneus (253617), your lack of trust of your own "friends," is sad. Other peeps trust theres. Upgrade time?

    @ interkin3tic, Tibetans are regularly tortured or murdered, by the CCP, in occupied Tibet. Perhaps you could do something to reform the political situation you are in, instead of having a wee tanty at those who expose abuses of power? If it was good enough for Martin Luther King, Gandi and Nelson Mandela, perhaps you could try?

    Technically, it is interesting to analyse how the CCP coded.

    In Buddhist and political terms, Stand up for a Free Tibet, please? :-)

    GreekGeek :-)

  19. Yes, in Hongkong and Taiwan by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Nexus devices are available in Hongkong and in Taiwan

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  20. Oh, attactment from unknown source! by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Let's click it. What is this, 1995?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Oh, attactment from unknown source! by antdude · · Score: 1

      It will be forever. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  21. The dancing bunnies problem by tepples · · Score: 1

    How about take away the privilege by default, and require that the user enable the ability install potentially insecure apps?

    That's what Android does (the "Unknown sources" checkbox) and what Mac OS X does (Gatekeeper choosing among App Store only, registered Mac developers only, or all executables). But you'll end up with the majority of users having enabled that ability and left it enabled because at some time in the past they wanted to see dancing bunnies.