Slashdot Mirror


Kobo CEO Says Not Selling Washing Machines Key To Overtaking Amazon

DavidGilbert99 writes "Kobo, the Canadian-based ebook company is number two in the market, behind the behemoth that is Amazon. So what does the CEO Michael Serbinis think is the one thing which will allow them to overtake the e-commerce giant? 'We don't sell any washing machines, we don't sell radios. We are not focused on the next server farm to offer data services. It is a question of focus.' Serbinis goes on to tell IBTimes UK: 'From an organization standpoint at Kobo, this is all we do. Everyone at Kobo, all we focus on is creating a great experience for book-lovers.'"

207 comments

  1. Focus all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Doesn't mean you'll be the best at it.

    1. Re: Focus all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      For me the value and Amazon is almost entirely in the user reviews that's why I go there; it's what makes me keep coming back. unless you're huge like Amazon you will have that kind of feedback from users all you really have in the product description and that's it.

    2. Re:Focus all you want... by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah but focusing *can* lead to superior results.

      A lot of Amazon ebooks that are OCR scans (rather than directly made from author's digital source) are complete junk full of errors. (example: 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene) Now if their "focus" involves having human readers who *like* reading books as a hobby go through the scan and correct OCR errors by referencing the printed book, then yes I would say their focus can make them the best.

    3. Re:Focus all you want... by dragon-file · · Score: 2

      I completely agree. This to me sounds similar to the proverbial eggs in one basket. If the eBook side of amazon suddenly flops, the company will have enough sales else where to keep it afloat.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    4. Re:Focus all you want... by lgw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last I heard, AWS was Amazons largest source of profits now, having pulled ahead of the entire retail business.

      It looks like Amazon is a "cloud vendor" now, with a retail business to fall back on if the cloud doesn't work out.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Focus all you want... by NoKaOi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that's just not how the market work. Focusing might sound good on the surface, but in reality it's not going to be the most successful. It might even be better for the customers that it has, but it's not going to make more money. First off, if you can buy everything from one place then you are used to and comfortable with buying stuff from that place, so a vast majority of people will buy stuff from that store. Who do you think sells more dog food in America, Petco or WalMart? Secondly, if you're a company with more revenue streams, you have more resources to develop new products, and you have more resources to hold yourself up between the time you release those products and the time you actually start making a profit off of them.

      You can argue that Kobo's focusing could lead to better results in terms of user experience, but they aren't going to beat Amazon in terms of market share unless they really come up with something consumers think is unique and amazing.

    6. Re: Focus all you want... by Longjmp · · Score: 1, Funny

      Can you translate that to English please?

      --
      There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
    7. Re:Focus all you want... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes. I just downloaded a Kobe book - so far, half way into it, I'm finding it a much better experience. Every. Single.Amazon.Book. that I've purchased has numerous, obvious typos. Every single Amazon book that I've purchased has crap for illustrations. They're horribly compressed like they were planning on sending them through a 300 baud modem. Trying to read a history book with crap for maps is unpleasant and unnecessary.

      The illustrations in the Kobe book are pleasant, readable, zoomable. The reader is even nicer. Color me impressed so far.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re: Focus all you want... by PRMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      He likes Amazon's Customer Reviews.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    9. Re: Focus all you want... by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      You must be a voracious reader!

    10. Re:Focus all you want... by webplay · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You heard wrong. The estimate is that it will account for about 20% of Amazon's profit in 2013. It is growing faster than the rest of their business, though.

    11. Re:Focus all you want... by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      Which is kind of ironic considering their cloud vending came from their retail business. Amazon used to have tons of extra server power set aside which was just used keep the site running smoothly during the insane blitz of online shoppers during the holiday season. Of course that only lasted for a month or so out of the year so they began to lease out that extra server power during all the months it wasn't in use.

    12. Re:Focus all you want... by misosoup7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except that's just not how the market work. Focusing might sound good on the surface, but in reality it's not going to be the most successful. It might even be better for the customers that it has, but it's not going to make more money. First off, if you can buy everything from one place then you are used to and comfortable with buying stuff from that place, so a vast majority of people will buy stuff from that store. Who do you think sells more dog food in America, Petco or WalMart? Secondly, if you're a company with more revenue streams, you have more resources to develop new products, and you have more resources to hold yourself up between the time you release those products and the time you actually start making a profit off of them.

      You can argue that Kobo's focusing could lead to better results in terms of user experience, but they aren't going to beat Amazon in terms of market share unless they really come up with something consumers think is unique and amazing.

      I'm just going to point out a few minor flaws in your argument. In Petco vs Walmart example, WalMart is still only in one industry, retail. This is considered relatively focused as far as the market is concerned. The issue with Amazon is that they've actually diversified outside of retailing such as Video Streaming, Cloud Vending, Logistics (third party sellers and Amazon then distributes), and other smaller segments. So Amazon is not focused. But on the other hand, Kobo is too focused. They only do one thing. But I totally agree with you that they need something amazing to beat Amazon since Amazon has such a head start on Kobo in the market.

      So I guess what I'm trying to say is that there is a spectrum of focus. 1. Ultra-focused: Petco and Kobo, 2. Focused: Walmart, 3. Not Focused: Amazon, 4. Conglomerates: 3M, Time Warner.

      Corporate Finance basically tells that Ultra-focused companies usually end up in niche positions. Companies like Walmart generally do very well. Amazon will still do OK, because their "diversified" businesses come from core capabilities required to succeed at their core business, ie logistics and excess server power. And then conglomerates generally trade at a discount in the stock market because generally the disadvantages of diversification outweighs the advantages, and individual investors can diversify themselves as opposed to having to invest in diversified companies.

      That being said, I don't think Kobo will be able to beat Amazon anytime soon. After all there aren't that many David vs Goliath stories unless there is mismanagement or the "Goliath" is resting on its laurels.

    13. Re:Focus all you want... by ThisIsSaei · · Score: 1

      A better user experience is unique and amazing.

    14. Re:Focus all you want... by jsdcnet · · Score: 2

      Which is kind of ironic considering their cloud vending came from their retail business. Amazon used to have tons of extra server power set aside which was just used keep the site running smoothly during the insane blitz of online shoppers during the holiday season. Of course that only lasted for a month or so out of the year so they began to lease out that extra server power during all the months it wasn't in use.

      This is a myth. AWS founder addressed in in a Quora answer: http://www.quora.com/Amazon/How-and-why-did-Amazon-get-into-the-cloud-computing-business

      --
      no longer working for cnet
    15. Re: Focus all you want... by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... which are full of fake, paid content. I stick to fiction with a better plot ... on my Kobo.

    16. Re:Focus all you want... by aynoknman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. I just downloaded a Kobe book - so far, half way into it, I'm finding it a much better experience. Every. Single.Amazon.Book. that I've purchased has numerous, obvious typos. . . .

      s/Kobe/Kobo/ ... Every.Single.Slashdot.Post ...

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    17. Re:Focus all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The issue with Amazon is that they've actually diversified outside of retailing such as Video Streaming, Cloud Vending, Logistics (third party sellers and Amazon then distributes), and other smaller segments. So Amazon is not focused"

      On the other hand, you could say that Amazon has simply turned those things into commodities, in which case they are still very much focused on retail.

    18. Re:Focus all you want... by jythie · · Score: 1

      *nod* and there is a lot of room there for a superior experience. Amazon's search has gotten worse and worse. Sometimes just finding something can be enough of headache to send me elsewhere.

    19. Re: Focus all you want... by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      you know i go to amazon quite a bit, sometimes intentionally other times by accident looking at reviews. I cant remember the last time I bought something from them or from an affiliate (well, through amazon anyway im sure ive dealt with affiliates) but the reviews are great, just ignore 0 and 5 and look at 2 3 and 4 stars, decide which ones are good and which ones are FUD and go from there.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    20. Re: Focus all you want... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      amazon has zero monitoring/takes zero actions to ensure that reviews are valid. Even yelp with it's questionable reviews is more reliable than amazon. Amazon's review system and google's are about the same in terms of reliability.

    21. Re:Focus all you want... by wisty · · Score: 1

      Wow. That Quora post has a lot of buzzwords.

    22. Re: Focus all you want... by citizenr · · Score: 1

      you can buy those at $1-3 per review

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    23. Re: Focus all you want... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I tend to aim for the one star reviews and see what the major gripes are. So long as it is a major gripe that I don't anticipate running into, or at least I think that for the price it's worth the risk, then I'll go ahead and buy it.

      For example I bought a cable recently, which had two single star reviews. Both were complaining that the cable was too short. The description said 4 feet. 4 feet is exactly what I wanted, so I bought it, and what do you know, I got a 4 foot cable.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    24. Re: Focus all you want... by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Also, Amazon's prices are among the lowest. Another big selling point of Amazon is that we already have our shopping data saved on Amazon (credit card, address, etc). In theory, if I cross shopped for typical items I buy, I could have saved a few bucks by buying from other vendors, but this means I have to spend time entering my credit/address data, and then deal with yet unknown to me return/support policies.

    25. Re: Focus all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which are full of fake, paid content.

      Only if you're looking for mainstream trash.

    26. Re:Focus all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you'll find the typos are actually Amazon inserting a digital fingerprint in every copy downloaded. I noticed it a while back and checked a book against a friends device that had the same book - the typos were not in the same place.

      I'm guessing the idea is that if you somehow steal a book out of Kindle / Kindle app then they'll know who did it

    27. Re:Focus all you want... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      1. Focus on your core competencies.
      2. Diversify.
      3. ...?
      4. Profit!!!!!! (for consultants)

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re: Focus all you want... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2

      I also go to amazon quite a bit, but for book reviews I usually go to other sites like goodreads.com. However, for music, the sound bites usually give you a pretty good idea of whether or not you want to buy it. I've made a couple of bad purchases with that, but on the whole it works well.

    29. Re:Focus all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also have to consider how Amazon accounts for cost. If the retail part of Amazon suddenly disappeared then costs for the cloud services would suddenly appear. It is inevitable that the existing part of Amazon is carrying some of the cost of any new venture within Amazon.

    30. Re:Focus all you want... by bsane · · Score: 1

      >like they were planning on sending them through a 300

      Close- they're planning on sending them via cell service. A service that they only charge the customer a fairly modest fee at the time of purchase. Whatever their deal is with the carriers I'm sure it saves Amazon a fair amount of money to compress the hell out of them. That said, why should everyone suffer for the convenience of cell downloads?

    31. Re:Focus all you want... by bsane · · Score: 1

      This should be self-evident. If AWS was extra holiday capacity, they'd start shutting down AWS servers (or jacking up the rates) so that Amazon proper could get their needed servers back.

    32. Re:Focus all you want... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2

      I think you'll find the typos are actually Amazon inserting a digital fingerprint in every copy downloaded. I noticed it a while back and checked a book against a friends device that had the same book - the typos were not in the same place.

      If true, then that is so grossly unprofessional, it's horrifying. Have you taken this up with Amazon? It should certainly be made public knowledge.

      OK, I don't normally use Amazon for my ebook downloads (to be truthful, lately I've been using bittorrent to replace books for which I have already paid in dead-tree format, since I have recently moved home and don't want to have to think about reinforcing floors again to take the weight of bookshelves). But I have found that many retail epub files are inexcusably badly formatted. I don't consider myself a CSS guru, but I have learned enough about it over the last couple of years, since my normal practice is now to process any newly-acquired book through Sigil to get it looking presentable. This has also had the additional benefit of getting my regex skills polished better than hitherto ever been seen.;)

      It's a minor PITA that the first thing I have to do is rip out the DRM, but ePUBee (which runs happily under WINE on *nix boxes) copes well with Adobe's Adept. And I have more recently discovered Apprentice Alf which offers even more info re DRM removal, apparently including a plugin (which I have not yet tried) for Calibre.

    33. Re:Focus all you want... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      You can argue that Kobo's focusing could lead to better results in terms of user experience, but they aren't going to beat Amazon in terms of market share unless they really come up with something consumers think is unique and amazing.

      If I could justify getting another e-reader (I already have a Sony PRS-T1 with which I am perfectly happy) I would have a serious look at the Kobo Aura HD. Although I haven't seen it in my hands, it looks very sweet, although of course not as compact as my Sony device.

    34. Re: Focus all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fakes aren't usually hard to spot. Plus I feel there is more benefit to be had from looking at the negative reviews, to see what issues people have with the product. Sure you need to make a judgment call on how much weight to give the reviews you read, but I still find them useful.

  2. DRM? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

    Everyone at Kobo, all we focus on is creating a great experience for book-lovers.'"

    Come on, how hard is it to not implement DRM?

    1. Re:DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends... how easy do you think it is to find another line of work when higher powers decide you're a loose cannon that needs to be let go (without any sort of real parachute) simply for mentioning that you don't agree with that kind of business model?

    2. Re:DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Isn't it the *publisher* that decides whether or not to use DRM? In which case the distributor (Kobo , Amazon, B&N, Diesel or whoever) have to offer DRM or DRM-free according to the publisher's wishes?

    3. Re:DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is, but you discount the power that a big vendor can wield. If a sufficiently popular store offers you the choice between losing the DRM or being dropped from the catalogue, you'd be thinking hard about doing what they say. Of course, it cuts both ways, a big publisher might have more leverage than the vendor.

      Of course, there has to be significant pressure from the customers for the vendor to even want to drop DRM. They'd much prefer to have the lock-in if it doesn't cost them too many sales.

    4. Re:DRM? by Absolutely.Geek · · Score: 2

      I find that my Kobo works just fine with non-DRM .epub files....there are plenty available.

      Check out project Gutenburg

    5. Re:DRM? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Come on, how hard is it to not implement DRM?

      Easy, but it means the customer cannot read ebooks where the publisher added DRM. What you need to ask is: How difficult is it to allow publishers not to use DRM (hello, Amazon!), and how difficult is it to convince publishers to use standard formats that are DRM free. The first one is easy, and everyone except Amazon does it. The second one, tougher.

      Another question: Do you consider your email address embedded in a book to be DRM? DRM usually means "we prevent you from doing any copyright infringement, we also prevent you from doing things that you should be perfectly entitled to do". Embedded email address means "you can do all the things that you should be entitled to do. You can also commit copyright infringement if you want to, but you might get caught".

    6. Re:DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Amazon, Kobo clearly states whether an ebook is DRM'd or not on their web store. Now it is up to consumers to pressure publishers into not using DRM. Kobo aren't big enough to force publishers not to use DRM, so they can't really do much more than that.

    7. Re:DRM? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Pretty hard if you want major publishers to support your device.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The buyer decides not buy DRM.

  3. No Android App by swillden · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I won't even seriously consider them until I can read their books on my tablet and phone. I was an early adopter of eBooks, buying my first Rocket eBook reader back around 1998, so I don't have anything against dedicated devices, but there's no longer any need, and I already carry a phone and a tablet which both work great as eBook readers... and with all three of the eBook reader apps I use I can even bounce back and forth between devices, reading on my tablet when it's handy or on my phone when the tablet isn't nearby.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:No Android App by ttucker · · Score: 1

      I won't even seriously consider them until I can read their books on my tablet and phone. I was an early adopter of eBooks, buying my first Rocket eBook reader back around 1998, so I don't have anything against dedicated devices, but there's no longer any need, and I already carry a phone and a tablet which both work great as eBook readers... and with all three of the eBook reader apps I use I can even bounce back and forth between devices, reading on my tablet when it's handy or on my phone when the tablet isn't nearby.

      I will not seriously consider them until they make a point of supporting the Kindle as an eBook reader.

    2. Re:No Android App by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      I won't even seriously consider them until I can read their books on my tablet and phone. I was an early adopter of eBooks, buying my first Rocket eBook reader back around 1998, so I don't have anything against dedicated devices, but there's no longer any need, and I already carry a phone and a tablet which both work great as eBook readers... and with all three of the eBook reader apps I use I can even bounce back and forth between devices, reading on my tablet when it's handy or on my phone when the tablet isn't nearby.

      Probably relates to the DRM issue above... Kobo's had an iOS app for ages.

    3. Re:No Android App by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Informative

      They use Adobe's ebook DRM scheme, so I just use ePUBee to yank it out.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:No Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I personally don't have a tablet and my phone isn't anywhere near smart. But even if I had those, I probably would still use my ereader to read books. Having compared reading on a friends tablet and reading on my kindle, I vastly prefer the kindle (even to real books). Of course there is also the fact that I am very easy to distract. If I was reading on a phone I would likely be messaging every now and then or on a tablet quickly switching between browsing and reading. I find my books most enjoyable when I am really focussed on them, so for me, its great to have a dedicated device.

      Never mind that I get 30 days of battery life with the ereader, no crashes of the reader software (not common on tablets, but it still happens) and a rather good and light formfactor.

      To each his own, but I like that the ereader is a really dedicated device that does no more and no less than making books easy to read for me. Honestly, when you read, you usually will require stretches of more than 5 minutes, if not 10. Once its no longer a "pull out of the pocket and quickly glance at the screen" situation, there is no real problem in ensuring you have the device with you when you intend or guess you may end up reading.

    5. Re:No Android App by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link.

    6. Re:No Android App by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I use a Samsung Media Player 5 for an ebook reader with FBreader. It works well and it fits my pocket better. I need the 5" screen as that size seems to be perfect, big enough but not too big. Actually almost exact same page size as a paperback book without the margins. If I can't carry it in my pocket it is no good to me. I do like the kindle's e-ink display better though.

    7. Re:No Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like this app ?

    8. Re:No Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They've had a kobo app for Android forever...
      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kobobooks.android

    9. Re:No Android App by buals3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kobo has an Android app.

    10. Re:No Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you look? The Kobo reader is available through Google Play... just open Google Play and search "kobo". And there are other readers on Google Play that support Adobe DRM.

    11. Re:No Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the de facto industry standard is epub which Amazon deliberately refuses to support in favor of their own proprietory format, and your complaint is that Kobo supports the industry standard but not Amazon's private fiefdom . To each his own, I guess.

    12. Re:No Android App by Shrubbman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I won't even seriously consider them until I can read their books on my tablet and phone. I was an early adopter of eBooks, buying my first Rocket eBook reader back around 1998, so I don't have anything against dedicated devices, but there's no longer any need, and I already carry a phone and a tablet which both work great as eBook readers... and with all three of the eBook reader apps I use I can even bounce back and forth between devices, reading on my tablet when it's handy or on my phone when the tablet isn't nearby.

      Um.... did you even bother to check? Because yes Kobo DOES have an Android app, I've got it on both my phone and my rooted Nook Color.

    13. Re:No Android App by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Informative

      They do have an Android app. They've had it for years.

    14. Re:No Android App by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      If you want a pocket-sized e-ink reader, find a Bookeen Cybook Opus. They've stopped making them, but they have a 5" screen and the case is designed so it fits nicely in a pocket, all rounded edges.

      They support either epub or MobiPocket, but not both at once. (It takes a firmware flash to switch back and forth.)

      I like mine enough that when I broke it (dropped something heavy on it. Oops.) I hunted up another rather than get a larger reader, even though I wound up paying more.

      They also have physical buttons for page turns, which is a must for me. The touchscreen Kindles drive me up a wall.

    15. Re:No Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you take the stereotypical gay, they tend to follow fashion trends more closely. I'd think another platform is for gays, because it's currently more fashionable.

    16. Re:No Android App by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that info.

    17. Re:No Android App by lxs · · Score: 2

      I don't know what tablet/phone you have, but Kobo has both Android and iPhone apps.
      Of course the greatest selling point they have is that they are not Amazon. That whole employing Neo-Nazis to police their slave labour / fucking over third party sellers / software patents thing makes me want to spend as little money as possible in their store.

    18. Re:No Android App by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing with Calibre. As soon as I heard of that instance of Amazon removing 1984 from Kindles, and closing that blogger's Amazon account for it being tenuously linked to an account which was banned (ending her Kindle access), I started stripping the DRM from every eBook I bought and keeping the DRM-free version on my PC. So, now I have a Kindle full of DRM locked eBooks, and a DRM-free ePub archive on my PC. If Amazon ever close my account, or I decide I want to move away, i'm only ever a jailbreak away.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    19. Re:No Android App by lxs · · Score: 1

      When I broke my Opus (apparently it's not a good idea to rest your full weight on your knee on the screen) I switched to a Kobo touch and never looked back. The Opus really is showing it's age. It's slow, the buttons are unresponsive and display of pdf is mostly broken. But it certainly was small and light.

    20. Re:No Android App by swillden · · Score: 1

      Cool. I looked on their site and saw nothing but their own tablets and mention of the iPad.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    21. Re:No Android App by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      As soon as I heard of that instance of Amazon removing 1984 from Kindles

      ... That's what got me into what I call future-proofing my books. (Incidentally, 1984 is available fron the .au Gutenberg site, or in a more e-reader-friendly form here since it is only the US copyright pirates/trolls that have a problem with that.)

      Although my Sony reader is "authorised" to accept Adept DRM epubs, I strip DRM from everything before importing it with Calibre.

    22. Re:No Android App by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem with the buttons on the Opus being nonresponsive. (Though if I hit the d-pad on a diagonal, sometimes it registers two presses.) It's slow in menus and such, but I never had a problem while reading.

      Which firmware are you using? I use the MobiPocket firmware, and never had a problem with PDFs. Other than it being slow to load them initially - once loaded, panning around works okay. I do have to zoom the heck in, because of the size of the screen. It's not a good device for reading my role-playing game books on, but for its intended purpose - novels - it's hard to beat.

      In general, I really like e-readers for anything I'm going to read start to finish, like a novel or a biography or something. Reference I'm going to flip around in, I want a paper book.

      What I'd like is an Opus with a frontlight. I don't need a touchscreen, or wifi, or any of that. ... having said that, the Ectaco Jetbook Color with the color e-ink screen and 170 language translation function, SAT courses, speech recognition for its built-in foreign language courses, and such, would be a fun toy. But it's $500. And it's rather large.

    23. Re:No Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kobo Mini is a nice 5" ebook reader, which is actually still being sold unlike the other one that was recommended. The internal storage also uses a micro SD card, so if you decide 2GB isn't enough, you can upgrade it so long as you don't mind opening it up. Unfortunately I broke the screen on mine, and I don't read enough ebooks to justify replacing it, so I decided to wait for a version of the Mini with a integrated light to be released.

    24. Re:No Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I won't buy a DRM'd book unless I can easily deDRM it. I'd prefer not to buy the DRM version at all, like I don't have to with MP3s anymore, but hopefully that will come.

  4. French books in Kobo e-book reader by pbasch · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe because they're Canadian, I found that Kobo was the only e-book reader was the only one that provided a decent, free, French dictionary. As a native English speaker reading books in French, this is a great feature. I also really like Kobo's interface. Will they be "the best"? I don't know... that's such an American obsession. Maybe they'll just be really good.

    1. Re:French books in Kobo e-book reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only complaint about the Kobo reader devices is that the two that I might otherwise be interested in (the Mini and the tablet) don't have SD or MiniSD card slots. I tend to prefer to sideload ebooks and store them on an external card. So the lack of an external card slot on the device makes it a non-starter for me.

    2. Re:French books in Kobo e-book reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be "the best"? I don't know... that's such an American obsession. Maybe they'll just be really good.

      I'd just like you to know that down here in America, we're all truly inspired by your dedication to mediocrity.

    3. Re:French books in Kobo e-book reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sony reader has a French-English and English-French dictionary. You can click on a French word and get the English translation. Sony uses Adobe Digital DRM so maybe it can use the same Adobe ID as on a Kobo.

  5. Re: WARNING ABOUT SLASHDOT CONTRAPTION.... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt it.

  6. Except its a lie. by tuppe666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kobo Inc is owned Rakuten...who are Rakuten you may ask. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakuten Among its numerous online properties, its flagship B2B2C e-commerce platform Rakuten Ichiba is the largest e-commerce site in Japan and among the world’s largest by sales...in case you were wondering.

    Because I know you want to know http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&tl=en&u=rakuten.co.jp this is the washing machines they sell.

    1. Re:Except its a lie. by ikaruga · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That doesn't mean that Kobo sells washing mashines. That is like saying that Youtube, which is owned by Google, provides a internet search engine.

    2. Re:Except its a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it was true and Kobo was all on its lonesome, it seems more likely the bigger company (who can afford to have loss leaders, more advertising, etc) is going to win.

    3. Re:Except its a lie. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Woah, woah, careful now. There are people who might be deeply injured by sentiments like "YouTube isn't the entire Internet" or "YouTube is owned by Google."

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    4. Re:Except its a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, but in the same way the ereader designing department of amazon likely doesn't also ensure the servers have the needed uptime or sends out shipping orders.

    5. Re:Except its a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurr durr, parent company vs company. Kobo is a small Canadian company that just had a nice M&A instead of venture capital. It still is 100% Canadian operated.

    6. Re:Except its a lie. by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except you can now compare Kobo not with Amazon, but the e-book department of Amazon.

      I didn't really buy into the CEO's comments because I believe Amazon would have had an e-book team larger than their entire company. But I didn't think his conclusions must be wrong, because indeed the Amazon would adjust its e-book related operations to serve the enterprise's other interests.

      Now that I know Rakuten owns it, it's a different story.

    7. Re:Except its a lie. by sa1lnr · · Score: 2

      Or you could just use their English page. :)

      http://global.rakuten.com/en/

    8. Re:Except its a lie. by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Amazon Digital Services is separately incorporated. So it's like saying that the parent organization of Youtube provides an internet search engine. Which it does.

      You'll need to move the goalposts again.

    9. Re:Except its a lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So Amazon would just have to rename its book division something like "Cobo" and their book division would have tha wonderful ability to focus just like Kobe. Wow, blindered logic is simple! You just have to manipulate the words and don't have to bother with the meaning.

    10. Re:Except its a lie. by vistic · · Score: 1

      I joined Kobo when they had about 50 employees and worked there for a year and a half. They had recently spun-off from Chapters/Indigo and renamed themselves from Shortcovers to Kobo.

      The Rakuten acquisition happened shortly after I left, but I imagine the only real impact to Kobo is in terms of having more financial backing and maybe it even helps them partner up with different book retailers in different companies.

      I can guarantee washing machines aren't on anyone's mind at Kobo HQ.

    11. Re:Except its a lie. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee washing machines aren't on anyone's mind at Kobo HQ.

      And I can guarantee washing machines aren't on anyone's mind at Amazon Digital Services either.

  7. Right.... by stanlyb · · Score: 1

    That's why after i bought my first (and last) Kobo, it lasted exactly one year, not a day more, not a day less. Keep going Kobo, but without me.

  8. So said by randomErr · · Score: 2

    So said the buggy whip manufactures around the turn of the century.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  9. Wrong. by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    The problem is that they don't sell washing machines.

    Amazon make enough profit in other areas of their business (eg: advertising) that they don't need to make a profit selling eBooks.

    They have shared infrastructure that lowers the cost of providing their eBook service.

    Even if they make a loss selling eBooks, they'll still make money from additional customers hitting their ads.

    Kobo must make enough profit to pay for everything - hosting, development, HR, CEO bonuses - from selling eBooks and eBooks only. Their product is going to cost more or they will make less or even lose money.

    1. Re:Wrong. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      At Amazon's e-book prices there is no way they can fail to make a profit.

    2. Re:Wrong. by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they don't sell washing machines.

      Amazon make enough profit in other areas of their business (eg: advertising) that they don't need to make a profit selling eBooks.

      This is actually the case with Kobo, too. As others have pointed out, Kobo is owned by Japanese internet giant Rakuten, which makes a lotta money. In their earnings statements, they don't even break out the Kobo division's revenue as a separate line item. So they said Kobo revenues were "up 143%" last year, but they didn't say how much they actually were. Thus I take their claim that they're #2 in the ebook biz with a grain of salt.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:Wrong. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      But Kobo don't share the same customers as Rakuten. Nobody is going to buy a DVD on Rakuten's website and get recommended a Kobo eBook the DVD was based on. Kobo are pushing themselves as a separate business, hardly anyone knows they're owned by a big Japanese company. In the American market that might even go against them.

      If you had the choice of the same product for the same price would you pick a local company or an international one? What if that international company was from the country that attacked Pearl Harbor and killed your Grandfather?

    4. Re:Wrong. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Not Amazon's fault. Apple's. Amazon used to sell ebooks at ebook prices - new $18 hardbacks for $9.99 in Kindle Edition - until the "agency model" gave the publishers the upper hand.

      I don't think Amazon is a perfect company, but they definitely are pro-consumer in the same way that great multi-supplier salesmen all are - they want the best deal for the customer, not the supplier, and they collect their money for providing good customers to the suppliers.

    5. Re:Wrong. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Considering that Kobo has very close to a majority marketshare in Canada (46% a year and a half ago, about double Amazon's), it doesn't seem surprising to me that they might be #2 globally. In the US, I would guess Nook would be second, but they don't sell it outside the US or UK, so it has a small marketshare globally.

    6. Re:Wrong. by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      It depends on the publisher. All of Tor's e-books are sensibly priced and DRM free as a matter of policy.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    7. Re:Wrong. by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Amazon wants the best for the customer? They were killing the publishers, and once publishers are gone, that's it.

      But since Iain Banks is mentioned, I compared a few prices (Amazon UK). eBooks they seem to be identical to iTunes. For audiobooks, there is a strange pattern: Hydrogen Sonata, £24.27 reduced to £12.74. At iTunes, £10.95. (At iTunes paid for with my stash of gift cards purchased 20% reduced, £8.76). That same pattern through all Iain Banks audiobooks. There's a high price shown at Amazon, heaven knows where it comes from, there is a much lower price that Amazon charges, and there is a lower iTunes price.

      By showing a higher price and making the customer think they get a bargain, while being considerably more expensive than Apple, they demonstrate quite clearly that they do NOT want the best deal for the customer.

    8. Re:Wrong. by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Google and Apple, both of which operate online bookstores, too. If we're going to talk about "the ebook market," I don't think tracking sales of ereaders is the way to do it.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  10. uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this a post or an ad?

  11. Good luck with that approach. by rjkimble · · Score: 2

    I now start at Amazon for pretty much all my shopping. And I buy a LOT of stuff from them. I think they have a totally correct focus.

    --

    Guns don't kill people -- people kill people.
    But the guns seem to help a bit. (apologies to Eddie Izzard)
    1. Re:Good luck with that approach. by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, claiming that focusing on one thing means you somehow have an advantage at *selling* that thing (vs. providing the "best" product regardless of sales) is pure CEO babble.

      Case in point - Walmart. They don't really do anything well except being price competitive and stocking about a quarter million SKUs in one store. Compare to local businesses that usually have great service and do one thing really well. And we all know how that's turning out...

    2. Re:Good luck with that approach. by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      local businesses that usually have great service and do one thing really well. And we all know how that's turning out...

      What great service, and what one thing do they do really well? I've never been impressed with the service obtained at the sort of store that Wal-Mart has killed. Wal-Mart is open 24/7 at nearly all locations. In big cities this isn't necessarily a huge triumph, but - actual example from ca. 2008 - your iPod adapter dies at 8 AM on Sunday, in the rural South, just after the start of a twelve-hour road trip. If you're lucky, there will be a Radio Shack down the road that will open around noon. Wal-Mart? They're open, the nearest one is visible from the highway, and it's only 20 miles down the road, because they put stores in towns of 5000 people. You go inside, get your adapter for far less than the Radio Shack rape price, and maybe even pick up some snacks for the road while you're in there. I don't buy my steak at Wal-Mart... but commodity stuff? Absolutely.

    3. Re:Good luck with that approach. by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      I guess you are either too young to have actually experienced real small businesses in a town or from a really crappy area. Also, who gives a shit when all you are buying is a silly adapter where you already know what you want? The point of expertise and customer service is when you DON'T know what you want...

      1) electronics/stereo stores (Radio Shack doesn't count, are you kidding me?). Last time I went into a decent stereo/home theater store the salesman spent about 20 minutes showing me their cool demo rooms, his favorite hardware, etc. And that was all *after* I had made my purchase. Only reason they are still around is because it's a high end shop that the box box stores don't directly compete with. But there used to be many places like this. Now you want the mass market electronics you can get a great deal but don't expect the Walmart workers to be able to answer any questions beyond "how much?" and if you are lucky "is is actually in stock?"

      2) record stores: you used to be able to go to a record store (sometimes even into the CD era) and browse, listen, even hang out as long as you want, and the employees would be music lovers who could pretty much answer any question you could think of, or just shoot the shit with other music lovers. Later, some stores (Tower Records, etc) expanded to movies and other media, but eventually a combination of big box stores and digital music killed most of them off...

      3) pharmacy (not even going to go there, but the rare experiences I have had with the Walmart pharmacy have made me feel lucky I even got the right prescription filled. Of course after standing there waiting for a half hour with the acrid smell of McDonald's french fry oil in my nose I almost needed more drugs.

      4) optometrist (similar to above) Their exam, frames, and lenses are cheaper. But you really do get what you pay for...

      5) hardware. Just TRY to find a single employee in the average Walmart who can tell you anything useful about plumbing, electrical, woodworking, whatever.

      6) gardening/nursery. Same as 5.

      I could go on forever with this! And I don't blame the employees at Walmart - you hire a minimum wage worker, how can you expect an expert in a field? Well, unless they used to have their own business for 20 years and had to get a job at Walmart after it went under...

    4. Re:Good luck with that approach. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I'm 38. Draw your own conclusions about how experienced I am. I'm from a small city in the South; Wal-Mart is not only cheaper than the stores that preceded it, it's better, too. Not all of us can live in Beverly Hills, and I make a metric fuckton more money living in a crappy little metro in the South (right next to both our families) than I would in a big city. The airport's only 15 minutes from the house, and you never need to get there more than 45 minutes before your flight leaves.

      High-end stereo shops weren't killed by Wal-Mart. I don't buy electronics at Wal-Mart for the same reason I don't buy my steak there: they don't sell high-end stuff, they sell cheap stuff. You're a fool to buy anything that isn't commodity-grade there. OTOH, I'm still using a $30 food processor I bought at WM years ago, because I use a food processor once or twice a year. Saved me about $300 vs a Cuisinart.

      Record stores? Those were killed by Amazon and piracy, not Wal-Mart.

      Pharmacy and optometrist? I buy contacts at Wal-Mart because my contacts are a cheap commodity. I buy glasses from a local optician because I have awful myopia and need the thinnest material possible, but they cost over $500/pair for the lenses alone.

      Hardware and garden/nursery? Hardware stores weren't put out of business by Wal-Mart; they've been killed by Lowes and Home Depot. Nurseries are doing just fine, they've moved away from the commodity plants and specialized in pots, better/rarer plants, and landscape/garden design. When I want to get this year's herbs (sweet and Thai basil every year, some peppers, maybe cilantro), I go to Wal-Mart because it's cheaper. When I want 400 impatiens, I go to a big-box. When I want a palmetto, I go to a nursery.

  12. Kobo is an anagram by erroneus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know why I am just now seeing it. I've always disliked the name and thought it was meaningless. But then I just realized it's "booK" with the letters all mixed up.

    1. Re:Kobo is an anagram by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Funny

      But then I just realized it's "booK" with the letters all mixed up.

      I've always assumed it's some weird endianness issue. Which doesn't bode well for the actual e-books...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:Kobo is an anagram by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      My guess is that they heard about this study's conclusion that you can reorder the interior letters of a word and still have it be entirely readable, then realized it was pointless to do it with "book" and said screw it.

    3. Re:Kobo is an anagram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feel bad, I didn't realise that either. But then it took me forever to realise that 'Beatles' was a pun.

    4. Re:Kobo is an anagram by damnbunni · · Score: 2

      Well, if we're admitting taking forever to get the joke, it took me damn near fifteen years to get that the name of Sonic the Hedgehog's sidekick was a gag. A real 'Oh, duh. ... how the hell did I miss that?' moment.

      (Tails's name is Miles Prower.)

  13. Physical interface by EdZ · · Score: 2
    No page-turn buttons? No sale.

    Sure, a touch-screen is nicer than a 4-way pad for selecting menu items, but I bought an e-reader to read books, not navigate menus. This is also my beef with the Kindle Touch/Paperwhite/whatever the non low-end models are called now. The basic bog-standard kindle, I can pick it up and hold it while reading without worrying if I'm about to accidentally turn a page, change the font size, exit my book, etc.

    I did briefly own Kobo's lower end model for about 2 days before returning it. That one did have buttons, but you also had to go and make a cup of tea between every page turn. Kobo no longer even sell that model, or any others with page-turn buttons.

    1. Re:Physical interface by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I've got two Kindles, the first is the Kindle Keyboard (AKA Kindle 3), and the second is the Paperwhite.

      I do miss the buttons a bit. If I had it my way, I'd have the paperwhite with both a touchscreen and page turn buttons. The touchscreen is enormously better for doing pretty much anything else on the thing, be it buying a book, selecting a book, changing an option, chapter selection, etc. But the physical page turn buttons were better.

      That said, it's not that bad, and accidental page turns haven't really been a problem.

      My parents have a Kobo Touch (produced somewhere between the Kindle 3 and Kindle Touch). Wasn't a fan, didn't like the interface. Kindle's interface has a bunch of issues, but the Kobo interface (at the time) just confused me.

    2. Re:Physical interface by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Have you used the Kindle Touch, or similar? I own one; The lack of buttons is not a hindrance at all. I can easily and comfortably slide / rock my thumb from the right bevel onto the screen and move to the next page. Even better, though, is if I want to move back a page, forward a chapter etc, all I need do is move the Kindle to my face and use my nose. It sounds stupid, but it means I can absolutely use it as an eReader one handed. You just can't do that with buttons.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Physical interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Nook with both the touchscreen and physical buttons.

      While the touchscreen does its job, I use the buttons a lot and I would miss them (even if they're not very good on the Nook).

    4. Re:Physical interface by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      ... all I need do is move the Kindle to my face and use my nose.

      Wow. I thought I was the only one who did this. Live and learn....

      --
      That is all.
    5. Re:Physical interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want both touch screen and page turn buttons, sounds like you need a Nook from Barnes and Noble. I've bought two and really like them.

    6. Re:Physical interface by EdZ · · Score: 1

      You just can't do that with buttons.

      For page turning, you can definitely use a Kindle with only one hand. If held from the back, you can easily hit the buttons on either side with either your thumb or fingertips. If held folio-style, you can press the page-turn buttons of whichever side you are holding with the flesh of your palm.

  14. B&N Doesn't Sell Washing Machines Either by joelsherrill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmmm... and it is working for them to beat Amazon.

  15. Great E-readers don't sell. by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 1

    It's all well and good to be a one product company that does one thing really well. The truth is, you need to work with a lot of different organizations if you are in the E-reader business. And E-readers are no more end goals than Phones.

    This is where the size of Amazon plays a big role. Sure, they sell other stuff. But they sell books (dead-tree versions). And music. And movies. And they can sit down with publishers and set terms, sign up authors, make money off advertising, and do a lot of other things that support their products. I bought a Kindle DX, and the lending library program is one of the big plus points for me. And I joined their Prime program, which gets me access to other digital content. These incentives keep me going back to Amazon. If I like one of the books I loan out, I buy it.

    An e-reader is a device. It isn't a goal in itself. The content is the goal. The iPhone needed a carrier - just selling an unlocked phone for $600 wouldn't have helped Apple (not to start a flamewar, use any phone you want in this example) - they needed a carrier's backing to take off. So claiming you make a great e-reader isn't worth much unless you have the infrastructure to support it - THIS infrastructure is what Amazon can afford to buy because they sell washing machines.

  16. IBTimes? this must be spam by Qwavel · · Score: 1

    Isn't IBTimes widely regarded as one of the slimiest sites around. Notice that, if you try to stop the auto play video it will wait a minute or two and then auto resume.

  17. Netflix for books by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    I know there's another site, can't remember the name, that let's you subscribe to all the ebooks you can read. If I were Kobo, I'd work something similar out. I'd give my ereaders free or severely discounted access to an online repo of ebooks "for rent". Also, make the damn things bigger.

    If they're going to say they're specializing, then they have to be the best in town.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re: Netflix for books by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      They did just announce a 6.8" reader, limited only to this year, to see if it's popular. It also has the highest DPI of any dedicated reader at 264, the same as a retina iPad. I'm actually sort of considering getting it.

      http://www.techspot.com/news/52251-kobos-68-265-ppi-aura-hd-ereader-is-coming-this-month-for-170.html

      I worry I will be disappointed by the title availability and price, and I really like Whispersync for Voice...

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    2. Re: Netflix for books by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      I read PDFs and epubs on my kobo often. It kind of sucks for PDFs, but it is usable and I've read plenty of PDFs that way. The navigation could be improved and the size of the reader limits reading PDFs to landscape mode, which makes about one paragraph legible at a time.

      I think I'd buy that if I knew the PDF problem was better handled...

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    3. Re: Netflix for books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. An ebook reader is meant to be used for reading ebooks, as the name clearly states. PDF has never, is not, and never will be an ebook format. Don't complain when your hammer does a less-than-amazing job as a wrench.

    4. Re: Netflix for books by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      It's still an eInk Pearl display, though. The different resolution displays all use the same eInk screen, but they put a different resolution of magnetic grid behind it.

      Having compared macro shots of my Kindle 3 and Kindle Paperwhite, I wonder if they're not getting near the limit of how much detail the Pearl display can resolve anyhow, regardless of the resolution of the magnetic grid behind it. On the Kindle 3, the pixels were very noticeably square, but by the time they hit the paperwhite they were a lot less distinct. As in, the eInk capsules are only so small, so you don't necessarily get improvements as you keep shrinking. They'd need to make the capsules smaller for that.

      I could be wrong, though, the Paperwhite might not be close to the limit, but take a look at the macro shots I made:

      http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27956537-

      The first shot is grainier because the camera ISO was much higher. The wavyness of the second shot is not photo processing, it looks like that in real life when magnified. The font size was set to the same on both Kindles.

    5. Re: Netflix for books by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      Dude, nice. I appreciate that! (I, too, have an account on dslr!)

      Can you tell me if the increased dpi/resolution makes reading PDFs any better? Like if I increase the resolution on my laptop I can display more information in the same area.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    6. Re: Netflix for books by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried PDFs, but I've viewed other images... It does look better, but the screens are small, and even being able to scroll with the touchscreen the scrolling is slow. It's not a fantastic experience

    7. Re: Netflix for books by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      Could I get you to load this on it, and see how it looks?

      http://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap21o.pdf

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    8. Re: Netflix for books by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Point form with random thoughts:

      - Zoomed out (to view the whole page) it's readable, but the text is tiny. The math formulas on page 202, the exponents are unreadable.
      - The PDF mode has a contrast setting that the text mode (books) doesn't, increasing the contrast a bit does help with the readability of the small print.
      - If you zoom in (pinch to zoom), it goes in a big chunk, so you can't zoom in just to remove the margin.
      - When zoomed in, scrolling is surprisingly smooth considering that it's e-ink. Maybe 4-5 FPS?
      - There seems to be a margin of whitespace around the PDF (even when zoomed in, you can see where the text cuts off), which is annoying considering the PDF itself has a whitespace margin. This reduces the readability. If I had to suggest a feature, I would add an option to disable the built-in margin, and to automatically trim the PDF's native margin. This would increase the text size and readability.
      - In landscape mode, the text is more than big enough such that everything is sharp and readable, but then you can only see part of the page.
      - In a pinch, it's usable, (the regular sized text is tiny but perfectly readable) but I wouldn't recommend this thing as a primary PDF-reading platform. Higher resolution might help, but the text is just too tiny when you take an 8.5x11 page and shrink it down to the pocketbook-sized screen. (it's 6" diagonal versus a sheet of paper which is 13.9" diagonal)
      - Combine higher res with automatic margin trim and a device this size could be pretty usable, but you could only do one of those on the current device (via software update).

      Gotta be honest, I bought this thing to read books, so that's the only use case that it has to meet to make me happy, and it does that extremely well. Very sharp text, the frontlight seems magical, and having a whole library in my pocket is awesome. But if you stray from books, the experience will be sub-optimal.

      Do you have any particular pages you'd like me to take a photo of? I tried snapping a few with my iPhone, but my hands were shaking too much, so I need to break out the real camera and tripod.

    9. Re: Netflix for books by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      Do you have any particular pages you'd like me to take a photo of? I tried snapping a few with my iPhone, but my hands were shaking too much, so I need to break out the real camera and tripod.

      Actually, yes, I would appreciate seeing page 4 (numbered 200 in the pdf), if it's not too much trouble.

      It sounds much like the experience I've had with my current Kobo. I can only read PDFs in landscape mode, and it's only good for "in a pinch". I bet that experience may be better, but it's definitely miles off from what I'm hoping for.

      Thank you so much for the very detailed review!! People like you are what make /. worth it!

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    10. Re: Netflix for books by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Here's the photo:

      https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48490966/IMG_5277.jpg

      And here's the RAW of it:

      https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48490966/IMG_5277.CR2

      The jpeg one was adjusted in lightroom to make it look more like real life. I adjusted the white balance (the camera's auto white balance picked a rather blueish hue), bumped the exposure up a bit (was a tad underexposed, still is, but good enough), disabled the chroma noise removal (not enough noise in the shot to justify it), and enabled lens profile correction for the camera (remove the remaining fisheye). The RAW is included for comparison. If memory serves, this one was taken with the paperwhite on full brightness.

    11. Re: Netflix for books by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I see what you mean. From the scale of the reader, that is a pretty difficult zoom to read. Since zooming PDFs is such a huge pain on ebooks, the whole thing's not likely to work very well.

      I really do just have to buy a Kindle DX if I want pdfs!

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    12. Re: Netflix for books by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the Kindle DX was discontinued. While I generally dislike reading on tablets (I've got an iPad, but I'd pick the Kindle for eBooks any day), they would do much better for PDFs. They can do colour, they're much higher res, and they're available in a 10" size that is at least not THAT much smaller than a sheet of letter/A4.

      Looking at PDF-like documents on the iPad is definitely a much better experience than doing the same on a notebook, though.

  18. Kobo #2? Really? by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    I like how the journalist blindly accepts their claim to being the #2 e-reader, completely ignoring Google (aka Play bookstore), Apple, or B&N. This smells like a CEO blowing smoke in the hopes of unloading a money-losing business on somebody else.

  19. Linux access by dpilot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Forget the android app, how about Linux access?

    A week or two back, after seeing the Iain Banks announcement on Slashdot, I decided it was time to buy "The Hydrogen Sonata" and went to the Kobo store to get it. I don't have Windows or Mac in the house, and use Calibre to talk to my Kobo.

    I knew it would have DRM, but figured that Linux didn't have to understand it, as long as the Kobo could. But the Kobo store wouldn't even permit me to download any sort of file at all - it would ONLY work through an Adobe Digital Editions plug-in. Looking on WineHQ the current version of A.D.E. doesn't run on WINE.

    Happily Kobo refunded my money, though it took a little doing. I'd rather they sell me a file that can be read on my Kobo, even if not on Linux. It would have seemed to me that the Kobo would generally appeal to the same type of people who prefer the politics of Linux - but they've cut me out of their store.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Linux access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Works for me just fine.
      http://robert.penz.name/440/howto-install-adobe-digital-editions-on-ubuntu-12-04-and-use-it-with-an-e-book-reader/

    2. Re:Linux access by dpilot · · Score: 2

      I see you're running 1.7.2 - the one WineHQ rates as "gold". The current 2.0 is rated as "garbage". I've found and downloaded 1.7.2 from Tucows, but I think I'll try it on my public library before trying to buy another book from Kobo - and even then I'll buy cheapy first.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:Linux access by iiiears · · Score: 1

      You might as well compile WINE from source it's easy enough and you know exactly what you are installing.

      --
      15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
    4. Re:Linux access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are talking about which version of the Adobe crapware is required. Not that newer Wine works better with the steaming pile of crap itself.

    5. Re:Linux access by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2

      For future reference, the adobe digital edition version is the drm-wrapped epub for transferring to any compatible app/reader. For kobo store to kobo reader, they use their own format (though it's still epub inside I think) - the formatting is a little better sometimes than the epub version. So you can buy in the kobo store, on pc or reader, and then sync directly over wifi into the kobo without needing to run it through calibre or any pc first - once it's in your kobo store library, you can delete and download direct as many times as you like. If you don't have wifi, you can download it in the kobo desktop app (again in kobo's own library format) and sync to the kobo over usb. I haven't tried it in wine (the desktop app is windows or osx only), but that may work better for getting it onto the reader than going via adobe crapware.

      Of course, that still leaves you with getting a permanent copy to put in calibre via adobe digital editions, left as an exercise for the reader. Given you'd already paid for it, I'd probably have just pirated the drm free version...

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    6. Re:Linux access by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, the tech support lady didn't even mention going direct to my Kobo. She basically did the "reboot Windows method of tech support," then gave up. I never set up my Kobo on my wireless, largely out of laziness because of my 63-character (max length, as far as I could tell) pseudo-random wireless password. If I can cut/paste, fine - but I've never bothered to type it.

      I've found the ADE 1.7.2 version, and if I can download it, I'll at least have a permanent copy.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    7. Re:Linux access by dpilot · · Score: 1

      A.C. is right, but for the snide /. value, as a matter of fact I run Gentoo Linux, and I ALWAYS compile my WINE from source.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    8. Re:Linux access by Absolutely.Geek · · Score: 1

      I find that a VM works better for this kind of crap ware......yes I could pollute my main system with it by installing it under WINE.....but when I have an old WinXP VM handy for just such an occasion...then why not.

      There are those that would disagree, noting the extra storage spare and hassle of having to boot into a VM just to run random crap ware (tm)....but I also like the fact that it only runs when I need it to run....not doing extra background stuff just because it is there.

    9. Re:Linux access by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      For future reference, the adobe digital edition version is the drm-wrapped epub for transferring to any compatible app/reader.

      To clarify: ePub can be DRM free, or it can have DRM _inside_ the ePub itself. You are saying that Adobe Digital Edition is ePub that is itself DRM free, wrapped in a DRM wrapper, like an mp3 file could be wrapped in a DRM wrapper, and not ePub with built in DRM?

    10. Re:Linux access by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Not that I have an axe to grind, but I would contend that the smallest tool needed to do the job is enough. If you already have a VM set up, then by all means go for it, since the crapware(? given that it is useful here) doesn't take up lots of space. But if you don't, then Wine at least never takes up more room than it needs.

    11. Re:Linux access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That actually requres having a windows license for the copy of Windows you install in the VM. Also, I've never noticed anything I've installed using WINE to run stuff in the background when I'm not using it.

    12. Re:Linux access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kobo, Netflix... it seems that we Linux users just don't matter. I wish I knew what could be done about it... besides simply not giving them my cash. Don't want me to pay for Netflix? Don't want me to "buy" your ebook? Fine, I'll go to the competetion -- THE PIRATE BAY, morons.

    13. Re:Linux access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, there are DRM free versions to pirate vs DRM encumbered versions to buy? Sounds like a nobrainer, then, piracy is clearly the only way to go if one wishes to obtain digitally distributed content, first buying the DRM'd version gives completely the wrong message, sadly.

    14. Re:Linux access by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Well it's certainly pretty straightfoward to remove the adobe digital editions drm from the epub and get a vanilla, unrestricted epub at the end of it - as long as you have the key to download and open it in the first place, anyway. As I understand it, epub DRM is done as an additional layer, separate from the XML/CSS that makes up the document itself, and no particular scheme is part of the spec - once the drm layer is removed from the content, it's no different to an unrestricted epub. But the file itself is an epub extension, so the ADEPT DRM is admittedly inside the zip file, and you need something capable of reading adobe digital editions restricted epubs to read it, i.e. pretty much any e-reader except the kindle. For me, the drm layer is a wrapper round the content that once removed gives a vanilla epub, but as you define it, no, it's not a separate wrapper with a custom extension.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    15. Re:Linux access by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Once you've got the ADE version epub, you can easily strip off the DRM using a calibre plugin, so you don't have to faff about with authorising devices in future when you change reader/app.

      I did that with the books I bought for my kobo; I've since upgraded to a kindle paperwhite, and used calibre to convert the drm-removed files to mobi, and can read them on that now. If a higher-res kobo with built in light had been available at the time, I probably would have stuck with that...

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  20. Kobo isn't the only one who is on focus by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    'We don't sell any washing machines, we don't sell radios. We are not focused on the next server farm to offer data services. It is a question of focus.'

    Kobo's CEO may think that he's the only one doing the focusing and he's implying that Amazon has lost focus ...

    Well, he might have a point ... but then, he's not entirely right either

    You see, Amazon may have branched out to non-book categories, but that does not mean they have lost focus

    What happens is that Amazon has shifted their focus onto something else

    It's all about business viewpoints

    Amazon started out carving out a niche market --- selling books online --- but when that niche market is filled with competitors, such as Kobo, it's no longer a niche market

    If you're the first one who came out with the instant noodles, you got the whole market to yourself

    Even if you restrict yourself in selling instant noodle that came with only ONE FLAVOR, the customers will have no choice to buy instant noodle of that particular flavor

    But when you start to have competitors that came into the market selling noodles with more exciting flavors, what do you do?

    You can either fight back, selling instant noodles with even more choices of flavor ...

    You can fight back with pricepoint --- lowering the price of your instant noodles ...

    Or ... you can shift your focus away from instant noodles, into something else

    As a business person myself I keep on reminding myself to be extremely flexible and agile in dealing with the marketplace

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Kobo isn't the only one who is on focus by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If you're the first one who came out with the instant noodles, you got the whole market to yourself

      But when you start to have competitors that came into the market selling noodles with more exciting flavors, what do you do?

      You can either fight back, selling instant noodles with even more choices of flavor ...

      You can fight back with pricepoint --- lowering the price of your instant noodles ...

      Or you sue them...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  21. The Article Is A Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kobo is part of Rakuten, previously known as Buy.com. They're no different than Amazon.com.

  22. Slashvertisment by GoChickenFat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    um...never heard of Kobo until now. #2, yeah right.

    1. Re:Slashvertisment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    2. Re:Slashvertisment by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Since when are they ahead of the Nook? I've heard of them before, but I thought they had dropped way back in recent years.

    3. Re:Slashvertisment by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      Global e-book reader shipments in the fourth quarter of 2012 will reach 4.57 million units, hiking 92% on quarter but dropping 49.1% on year, according to Digitimes Research.

      Thus, 2012 global shipments will reach 9.82 million e-book readers, decreasing 57.3% from 2011. Amazon will be the largest vendor in 2012 accounting for 55% of global shipments, followed by Japan-based Kobo with 20%, Barnes and Noble with 10% and Sony with 6%.

      http://www.digitimes.com/Reports/Report.asp?datepublish=2012/11/14&pages=VL&seq=200

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    4. Re:Slashvertisment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're bigger outside the US:
      http://www.wired.com/business/2012/01/kobo-amazons-only-global-competition/

      Granted, the article's a year old.

    5. Re:Slashvertisment by mapuche · · Score: 1

      You know Europe? I bought mine there.

    6. Re:Slashvertisment by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Nook wasn't even sold outside the US until a few months ago, and even then they only expanded to the UK. So of course Nook would be way behind.

    7. Re:Slashvertisment by andrea.sartori · · Score: 1

      Nope. They sell in other countries, too. Just bought one, and I don't live in the US or UK...

      --
      Mostly harmless.
    8. Re:Slashvertisment by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Your ignorance has no bearing on their sales position. You might also tell me that you've never heard of Huawei, but that doesn't mean they aren't huge.

  23. Bezos originally said the same thing. by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Can't find the quotation, but early on he was very clear on Amazon having focussed on books, for what seemed like very good reasons. As I recall, the point was that there were humongous numbers of titles--far more than any physical bookstore could stock; there was a well-structured database of them--Bowker's Books In Print; shipping size and weights were manageable; and there were straightforward and fairly speedy mechanisms to get any book in print from any publisher--you or I might have trouble ordering directly from a publisher, but a modest-sized business like a bookstore or like Amazon did not.

    As I recall, he said that it was much more suitable business than CDs, I think because the number of books in print was far higher than the number of CDs "in print."

    He gave what SEEMED like a very convincing case for books being uniquely suited to Internet commerce. I remember being very surprised when they branched out into consumer goods.

    1. Re:Bezos originally said the same thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He gave what SEEMED like a very convincing case for books being uniquely suited to Internet commerce. I remember being very surprised when they branched out into consumer goods.

      Books were, indeed, uniquely suited to internet commerce. That Amazon leveraged this into a retail monster doesn't make it any less so.

      Of course, Kobo doesn't sell books.

  24. Adobe's DRM makes Kobo a dangerous trap by DonaldGary · · Score: 2

    I bought a Kobo eReader because I wanted to support my local bookstore and didn't want to support Amazon or Barnes and Noble. I think that their eReader is clearly third best (behind Kindle and Nook) but I'm willing to ignore that because they do have an Android app. However, Kobo uses the Adobe DRM which seems to guarantee that your library will become obsolete (maybe unreadable) in a few years. Adobe allows you to register as many as six machines (computers or eReaders) on your account and you can read your eBooks on any of these machines. If you buy a new eReader or tablet every year it will only take a few years to reach this limit. At that time you won't be able to transfer your library to a new machine. Adobe's literature implies you can deregister a machine but as nearly as I can tell doesn't actually tell you how to do it. I tried the obvious google search and found an answer (but not from Adobe). It doesn't work on my system (Windows 7/64 bit and Galaxy Note 10.1). The method also won't work if the machine you want to deregister is lost or dead. Finally, there doesn't seem to be a way to see the list of machines Adobe thinks you've registered. Thus, there is no way to tell if their list is the same as yours. (I did find a post by someone who thought he had accidentally registered the same machine several times.) Finally, what happens when Adobe decides to stop supporting its DRM or Kobo goes bankrupt? (An even bigger problem for the Nook.) I spend too much money on books to allow my library to become obsolete in a few years. I really want Kobo to succeed, but it has to be nearly as good as Amazon. I don't think it's close.

    1. Re:Adobe's DRM makes Kobo a dangerous trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adobe DRM

      Yes, and that is also the format used by my local libraries. So if I want to read digital library books, Kobo is the reader of choice.

      Now, Amazon's Kindle, it is not supported by the libraries.

      Then again, I still prefer paper books so I didn't buy an e-reader. I just go to the library, get a book, and read it, paper page at a time.

    2. Re:Adobe's DRM makes Kobo a dangerous trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Kobo and pay for all my books. I even use the DRM's versions on my reader. But I do strip the DRM and back them up for my own personal use. Just in case this ship sails they are not taking my books with them. It's a matter of trust and I don't really have any for companies.

    3. Re:Adobe's DRM makes Kobo a dangerous trap by hodet · · Score: 1

      I'm just the opposite, I have a hard time reading paper now that I'm accustomed to my Kobo. The exception being reference types books that are not read in a linear fashion. Those are just downright painful on an ereader.

    4. Re:Adobe's DRM makes Kobo a dangerous trap by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I think that their eReader is clearly third best

      There's some european and russian ones better than all those three but they cost significantly more and there's not really much of an integrated bookstore. Where Kobo wins is they make it very easy for you to find a book on a whim from the device itself, spend money, and get it in less time than it would take to google where to find a torrent.

    5. Re:Adobe's DRM makes Kobo a dangerous trap by dkf · · Score: 1

      Those reference works translate quite well to this technology called HTML that's been around a few years now. I hear that there are even handheld devices which can navigate those sorts of documents efficiently...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    6. Re:Adobe's DRM makes Kobo a dangerous trap by woe · · Score: 1

      I don't particularly like defending any DRM system, but Adobe's is not as bad as you make it out to be. Although this isn't documented anywhere, I remember once reading a forum post from an Adobe employee who explained that they automatically add additional device authorisations over time to account for device lifecycles. If you do reach the limit, Adobe customer service will reset it on request. I can corroborate this from personal experience. Also: ADEPT has been comprehensively broken. Stripping the DRM from ADEPT files is trivial with readily-available Python scripts.

    7. Re:Adobe's DRM makes Kobo a dangerous trap by lxs · · Score: 1

      Not being able to deregister a dead machine is a drawback (I have had that happen to one windows client and one ereader), but if you break the DRM as soon as you've downloaded your book (which is childishly simple and good practice comparable with making regular backups) you can keep a functional copy around for eternity.

      Yes, it's a hassle but for me not a deal breaker. At least with epub you're not restricted to a single vendor.

  25. Kobo was acquired by the Japanese in 2011 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it may be still based in Toronto but it's no longer Canadian.

  26. Re:Kobo #2? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course Kobo is #2. My daughter just make a huge Kobo in her diaper...

  27. Re:Kobo #2? Really? by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    I like how the journalist blindly accepts their claim to being the #2 e-reader, completely ignoring Google (aka Play bookstore), Apple, or B&N. This smells like a CEO blowing smoke in the hopes of unloading a money-losing business on somebody else.

    They're #2 worldwide overall, although a lot of people don't realize it because they've had nothing but trouble trying to crack into the US market where they've been a distant also-ran from the get-go.

  28. Kobo? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Um unless there hardware has changed drastically they sold me the worst ebook reader I ever had. Couple that with DRM, a loading at that byzantine and no droid reader app. How about selling something that people actually want is the way to beat amazon? For physical goods prime is hard to beat.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
    1. Re:Kobo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kobo's had an Android app since 2010:
      http://gigaom.com/2010/06/18/kobo-reader-app-for-android-now-available/
      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kobobooks.android

      Which suggests your experience is based on their first-gen device. So, yes, the hardware has changed drastically in 3 years.

    2. Re:Kobo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second that. My wife got a Kobo Glo - it had some irritating SW bugs and the touchscreen was not great - not very responsive. After a bit the touchscreen stopped working in the top corner. We got it replaced - took weeks and they sent the wrong one (Kobo touch). Took more weeks to get the right one.
      During all this time my wife got annoyed by the wait and brought the Kindle paperwhite - completely different user experience. Nice to use, much more responsive etc. When the replaced kobo eventually got back I used it for a bit before getting annoyed with it too.
      I don't particularly want to support Amazon over Kobo but their hardware and software is far superior so it's a no brainer.

  29. No search in kobo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes kobo is so great you cant even search for a word or phrase in a book. So awesome.

    1. Re:No search in kobo by andrea.sartori · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. Perhaps you own(ed) an old one?

      --
      Mostly harmless.
  30. Amazon Showroom Effect by naroom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When Amazon started out, big-box stores became a showroom: people would look at that new TV, and go buy it on Amazon.

    Now, I go to Amazon to check reviews, but do most of my shopping on specialized vendors like Newegg or B&H Photo & Video. The specialized stores tend to have slightly better prices, or better selections, or better recommendations. Amazon is now my showroom for the rest of the Internet.

    1. Re:Amazon Showroom Effect by wmac1 · · Score: 2

      This.

      The point you mentioned is one of the textbook problems of internet marketing. All those shops are available within a click. You can see and compare the prices and you will eventually buy that same product from the most competitive (assuming that all of them are credible).

      That's the exact thing I do. I go to physical shops just to see and test the product and then buy it online for at least 10-20% cheaper price.

      The most attractive offering of Amazon is in fact its reviews and bigger inventory of books. But I have stopped buying physical books since a few months ago anyway. They are heavy, I am living in another country and I cannot carry back 200kg of books.

    2. Re:Amazon Showroom Effect by athenaprime · · Score: 2

      That's why Amazon's growth focus has been on products like Amazon Prime and the Kindle--both tools for making it worth your while to "one-stop shop" with them, rather than float on over to someone else's webshop.

      I will give them props for their prompt shipping--I've gotten stuff far sooner than I expected.

    3. Re:Amazon Showroom Effect by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      I actually do the opposite with my computer related purchases. I check Newegg for reviews then check if it is on Amazon. I'm a prime member so I get free 2 day shipping.
      I have never seen anything on Newegg for cheaper than it is on Amazon. They are almost always the same price unless it is from a third party vendor. Amazon actively checks prices on other sites and matches them, just like the big brick and mortar stores do with each other. Newegg does the same thing and typically matches prices from TigerDirect, Amazon, and other competitors.

  31. Amazon's own fault by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

    This is Amazon's own fault. The wife was looking for a ebook reading a long time ago, and the only realistic option was the Sony (the others were el-cheapo "Aluratek" and the like). Because Kindle and Nook were NOT AVAILABLE in Canada. And even when it was, you were importing it from Amazon US - no way to get it straight from Amazon.ca

    So Kobo jumped right in the big hole Amazon and B&N left by not offering their products in the Canadian market. People started buying Kobo's, showing it to their friends, who also got Kobos.

    And now Kobo is HUGE in Canada.

    --
    When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    1. Re:Amazon's own fault by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Nook still isn't, but the Kindle is sold by Amazon.ca directly now.

      When I bought my Kindle Keyboard, it was shipped from Amazon US, but the Paperwhite was a domestic shipment.

    2. Re:Amazon's own fault by Painted · · Score: 1

      "And now Kobo is HUGE in Canada."

      You sound like my boss. Full disclosure, I work at the largest independent publisher in Canada (if you cook in Canada, you probably have one of our titles)- and we went with Kobo exclusively for our ePubs. As a six million dollar paper publisher we sold... ... $15k in ePubs last year via Kobo, "the #2 ebookstore in the world, with 48% of the market!!"

      I've also noticed that when I travel, or talk to people about ePubs, eBooks, etc, I see iPhones/iPads (quite possibly running iBooks, Kindle App, or Kobo apps), Kindles, Nooks, etc.... I have seen exactly ONE Kobo actually owned by an end-user. I know that anecdotes are not data, but....

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
  32. shimpu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice information thank you ...best of luck

  33. Only size will cure it by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I ended up getting an ten inch onyx boox for PDF files. Turned to landscape with PDF files set to fit width (or point to point to cut off margins) it's pretty good. I've still got a Kobo touch which is better for epub novels. I recently stopped reading a hardback and finished it on the Kobo instead since I can bump up the font size to put it on the table and read while eating. The only downside is some books with illustrations (eg. Simon Winchester's "Atlantic") don't have them in the kobo version.

  34. Yep, Amazon's value is in the reviews... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I check Amazon for the reviews and then go buy it in a store.

  35. Although focus is not everything... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    ...and does, indeed, not mean you will be the best at it, focus still is the best way to becoming the best at it. This company has a CEO with common sense. My business is what they get.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  36. Kobo has awful customer service by jeaster · · Score: 1

    If you are in the market for an ereader, I implore you to search for kobo horror stories, my favorite is over on getsatisfaction.com. Typically, a user has a problem with their kobo (very common). They contact customer support, who are friendly and completely worthless. Customer support tells the customer they are escalating their ticket to level 2 support. Wait. Wait more. Complain. Wait more. Complain more. Repeat until fed up. Stay away from Kobo. I am waiting for the day they oust their worthless CEO or go out of business.

  37. Oh man, are you out of touch by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    There is no way a company only selling books will ever overtake a company selling EVERYTHING else including books. Leading eBook sales in Canada is not an indication of future success worldwide, and thats only because Amazon has only started offering Canadians the same services as Americans.

    Also lousy antiquated ports of Android on their devices is not going to be a win for Kobo.

    And not sure Kobo is going to make any headway against Amazon in big data. Kobo doesn't have the deep pockets simply because they DON'T sell washing machines and everything else.

    Finally, how is Amazon not delivering an exceptional eBook store as well as selling other consumer goods?. Last I checked the whole Kobo experience, from the tablet to their online services to the quality and amount of content, is subpar to everything Amazon does, even in Canada.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  38. Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're embarassing yourself Jeremiah Cornelius http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3581857&cid=43276741 since you posted that using your registered username by mistake (instead of your usual anonymous coward submissions by the 100's the past 2-3 months now on slashdot) giving away it's you spamming this forums almost constantly, just as you have in the post I just replied to.

    1. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, Paul.

  39. Shortsighted... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    When Amazon starts offering free washing machines with the purchase of a Kindle, boy are they going to feel stupid!

  40. Too small of a niche... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    You can also be overspecialized.

    Amazon is a big fat store. They sell stuff. It can be electronic or physical. This is handy when what you want is in one format but not the other.

    If you choose to ignore a large portion of the relevant product (namely books), then you are at a disadvantage to those that aren't so narrowly focused.

    Doesn't matter if it's Books, Video, or Music. Chances are that Amazon has it in one format or another.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  41. On the contrary by athenaprime · · Score: 1

    Amazon will eliminate your book reviews if you also happen to be an author, or if their algorithms determine you have any connection to said author, or sometimes randomly, out of sheer algorithmic butthurt. So rather than start your word-of-mouth marketing with friends and supporters, it pays to buy reviews from India or wherever.

    1. Re:On the contrary by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      wouldn't that simply make the situation worse?

  42. bad ebooks by athenaprime · · Score: 1

    Bad ebooks are often publisher!fail moreso than Amazon!fail. Especially digitized versions of older editions--those are frequently scans of print archived copies, or files that were taken by an unpaid intern and run through macros to get them out there quick before the authors asked for the digital rights back due to out-of-print-ness. A bad ebook for sale negates the oop clause in a lot of legacy contracts, often preventing the author from releasing a better, more updated version of his or her backlist.

    Also, Amazon uses the .mobi format where Kobo uses .epub - there are more validation checks and standardization in the epub process than in the mobi.

  43. Re:Kobo #2? Really? by vistic · · Score: 1

    Kobo has made a big push internationally where other companies aren't really doing much e-book business.