MuseScore Aims Make 50,000 New Braille Scores Available To Blind Musicians
rDouglass writes "After meeting Eunah Choi, a blind pianist from S. Korea (video), and learning about the accessibility problems faced by classical musicians who cannot see, MuseScore is planning to radically increase the number of Braille scores available, to make them easier to find, and affordable to acquire. This effort is an extension to the Open Well-Tempered Clavier project, and will involve the creation of a free web-service that bridges the gap between open source MuseScore and MusicXML-to-Braille libraries. It also involves converting the 50,000 scores on MuseScore.com into Braille, and making the website more accessible to blind and vision impaired visitors."
At work, I can't really watch video, so could someone explain how a blind musician reads braille while playing the piano or most other instruments? Aren't both hands occupied?
(Please, no mods to me. Give them to the people who answer.)
If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
well, the blind musicians certainly have not seen it.
factor 966971: 966971
I wonder if they braille scored John Cage's 4'33"?
And while we're at it, let's make the Van Gogh collection available to the blind as well.
This is *music* - the blind are blind, not deaf. What they are doing is not just good, it is good marketing - there are not that many blind musicians, but all the seeing musicians that read the story, are now aware of MuseScore.
If you want to compare it to something, compare it to movies and other broadcasts being available to deaf viewers. That's why there exists Closed Captioned and Described Video and is actually mandated in many jurisdictions.
BTW, Beethoven was deaf (by any legal definition) for most of his life. Hmmm?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_van_Beethoven
"And while we're at it, let's make the Van Gogh collection available to the blind as well."
The Van Gogh collection is already available to the blind just as sheet music is. Anyone *can* describe the paintings to them just as anyone *can* read them the sheet music. This is just making the sheet music more accessible to blind people so y'know they don't have to commit a score to long term memory or have someone sit there reading them the music over and over again as they practice.
Also your argument is flawed and you're being just being obtuse, and really kind of an ass. Of course no blind person is going to be an art (by art I mean visual art) but a blind person can for sure be a musician.
art critic* my bad
Who can name some other famous blind musicians?
Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
Would it be cheating to refer to Wikipedia's list of notable blind musicians?
"making the website more accessible to blind and vision impaired visitors."
LOL. They could start by not following the stupid 'low contrast' meme which seems to have taken over the minds of almost every web designer on the planet, stop using grey text on a light blue background, stop using light blue text on a light blue background, stop using almost invisible light grey borders, underline links, put their navbar links inside buttons so they are clearly clickable, etc.etc.
But that would be asking too much. The 'web designer's' ego is far more important than whether partially sighted people can use the site properly.
If they already have scores encoded with MusicXML and there are libraries to translate that into a braille format why do they need money to carry out the translation?
I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
Actually, closed captioning is for deaf viewers. Described Video is for blind viewers. May seem strange, but television and movies utilize both audio and video, so if you're deaf, you can still appreciate the visual content, if you're blind, you can appreciate the audio content.
What the OP describes would be a blind and deaf person trying to watch TV or a movie.
I had a very small song I needed to put into sheet music, so I figured I'd download a demo of one of the main (Windows) notation programs, Sibelius. Great program, very full-featured and complicated. Awesome program, but HUGELY expensive for a guy like me. Then I grabbed MuseScore, which is free (as in beer), and WOW! What a fantastic program! It has most (if not all) of the same features as Sibelius, but it's open source! Now they are working to facilitate braille! I know anybody could be doing this, but this is the kind of thing that makes open source stand out. Good for them! A big-name software company selling proprietary software would probably look at the size of the blind musician market and decide it didn't make economic sense. Since open source software isn't about making money on the software itself, they do this because it's a good thing to do and, yes, it raises their visibility for about 15 minutes, but it's really just cool to do! Good job.
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.