Slashdot Mirror


Smaller Than Earth-Sized Exomoon Discovered?

astroengine writes "Through the technique of microlensing, a candidate exomoon has been discovered in orbit around a free-floating planet about 1,600 light-years away toward the galactic bulge. The microlensing event, MOA-2011-BLG-262, was detected by the MOA-II telescope at Mt. John University Observatory (MJUO) in New Zealand and it appears to have a mass of approximately half that of Earth. The host planet is around 4 times the mass of Jupiter. Unfortunately there cannot be further studies of his particular exoplanet-exomoon pair (as microlensing events are transient and random), so the astronomers who made the discovery are remaining cautious and point out that although the exoplanet-exomoon model fits the data the best, there's a possibility that the lensing object may have been a more distant star with a massive exoplanet in tow. Microlensing surveys are, however, sensitive to low mass exoplanets orbiting massive free-floating planets, so this is a tantalizing first-detection. The study's pre-print publication has been uploaded to the arXiv."

25 comments

  1. That's no moon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    OK, proceed to normal discussions.

    1. Re:That's no moon! by dale.furno · · Score: 1

      you did not have to post that as AC.

    2. Re:That's no moon! by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      All I know is that there is little left to talk about now...

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    3. Re:That's no moon! by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      +1 Redundant?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  2. Is it there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    How do we know it's there? Sure they told us, but it's not like we can check it ourselves. It's not like we have a spaceship, which can take us there and see for ourselves. With all the NSA talk it could actually be healthy to think wider and more generally who can be trusted? This is specially interesting with claims nobody else can test for themselves.

    Having said that I have to say that it is entirely possible that this is the truth and I have no reason not to believe their reported find. I think it is interesting, but to be honest it is of little use. We kind of knew other planets could have moons and it isn't like we will start to mine this one or anything,

    1. Re:Is it there? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would serve any agency currently under scrutiny well to have astounding and spectacular tech or science headlines at this time. If you can get people that really that think to think about something else, ANYTHING else, then mission accomplished!

      That being said, anything we learn from outside our sun's gravity well may be new data worth examination.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:Is it there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, are you one of those "science isnt real we cant test it" idiots?

      Look at the data, make your own conclusions. Of course your conclusions will be "science is hard" and "its just numbers, it doesnt mean anything".

  3. you Faeil It?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    offended Some

  4. All These Micro-Lensed detected worlds are yours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    ...except Europa. Attempt no landing there. Use them together in peace.

  5. Winter Homes? by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Free floating planets give me hope. There are use cases for free floating planets. Stars explode. It's nice to know there are some places out there we can have low-maintenance long-term storage options deep inside, safe from cosmic rays or exploding stars -- We might not have to build them from scratch, or worry about how to power EM shields indefinitely. We ever make it off this wet rock before the sun explodes the Andromeda Galaxy will be merging with ours. That's a whole new galaxy full of resources, and it's heading our way. We'll probably need new stars and planets to harvest eventually, so that's a good thing.

    Unfortunately it doesn't look like life on Earth will be able to survive the sun's explosion, and we can't tow the planet in enough time to sling it away for posterity's sake -- Sure would be nice if we could though, maybe it's not impossible, but who can say what a few billion years of new technology will bring. It would be cool to visit the free floating frozen origin of our species rather than let it be fried to a crisp, and/or re-liquefied. The crust just isn't thick enough to burrow down in thanks to our large moon-making collision. C'est la vie.

    1. Re:Winter Homes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I daresay that at some point in the future we'll have access to a complete virtual copy of our planet. Just look at what Google Earth can do now, and extrapolate that technology a few hundred or a few thousand years into the future.

    2. Re:Winter Homes? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      If we need material from the Andromeda galaxy -- in that time frame. It seems to me that we will be such a widespread and dynamic race we will have built a few thousand/million new earths by then.

      And to harvest a galaxy worth of resources -- we'd have to move faster than light.

      I think before that, well have developed things like Force Fields. Which I'm now more certain of than ever, once you consider that Matter should be transparent and should not be blocking other matter considering how much distance there is between protons and electrons relative to their size. Force Fields are the only thing making matter solid as far as I can tell.

      So once you manipulate space/time to make it solid, perhaps you can fold space or poke a hole through it, or redefine your position (that's my most likely choice).

      As long as you are thinking big, you should think big.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  6. Zappa by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 3, Funny

    "... mass of approximately half that of Earth"
    How many moon units would that be?

    1. Re:Zappa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "... mass of approximately half that of Earth"

      How many moon units would that be?

      Around 40. At least if you can assume the mass reported for Earth and the moon given on wikipedia. A simple division says the earth is 81.2797 "moon units".

    2. Re:Zappa by Scarletdown · · Score: 4, Funny

      "... mass of approximately half that of Earth"

      How many moon units would that be?

      Around 40. At least if you can assume the mass reported for Earth and the moon given on wikipedia. A simple division says the earth is 81.2797 "moon units".

      Okay. Then how many Franks or Dweezils does that translate to? Like, ohmahgawd!

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Zappa by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Okay. Then how many Franks or Dweezils does that translate to? Like, ohmahgawd!

      I wish I had mod points because that is fucking funny... like, totally!
      I think it works out to 0.75 Ahmet, but I have no idea how many Diva that equals...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  7. Ever noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    how truly pointless this stuff is? Sure, there are a few astronomy geeks who are able to make a living (from grants, rather than productive economic activity) studying this stuff, but it has ZERO potential to actually produce any benefit and therefore generate value in the economy - it will always be a charity or a hobby.

    Only one nation has even managed to put a man on the MOON (orbiting THIS planet) and that nation is not now even capable of putting a CHIMP into orbit (something it COULD do 50 years ago). It's unlikely that we will put a man on even the NEAREST planet orbiting THIS star in the next 20 years. At the current rate of progress, it may be CENTURIES before we put a man on any of the interesting moons of even the big planets orbiting THIS star.

    Even if we were ready to go now, it would take a spaceship thousands of years to get from here to ANY of the "promising" exoplanets - so the people who pay for the trip would never get any return on their investment, the people who embarked would die of old age having never gotten out of our solar system (the voyagers have taken 40+ years to just reach the edge). By the time any human got to any exoplanet and sent word back to Earth, it's possible life here could be extinct or the people here could be so introverted they do not care and are not even listening. Anybody from the exoplanet making a return to earth would die en-route and his descendents (generations later and arriving thousands of years later) might well be considered "aliens" rather than triumphant returning explorers. The distances mean that there is no possibility for commerce or other interactions between humans here and humans there.

    It's fascinating to contemplate distant worlds, but it's simply not a productive activity and will not be until we first find a way to travel faster than light. Every dollar spent looking for other worlds orbiting other stars is a dollar wasted that COULD have been spent getting man back to the moon, getting man to Mars, or doing basic research on faster spacecraft propulsion.

    1. Re:Ever noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The observatory that published this isn't even American, you fuck.

    2. Re:Ever noticed by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Only one nation has even managed to put a man on the MOON (orbiting THIS planet) and that nation is not now even capable of putting a CHIMP into orbit (something it COULD do 50 years ago).

      Notice all the noise politicians are starting to make about regulating and "permitting" mining and settling of the moon, Mars, asteroids, though.

      Collapse all economic dynamism, but god damned, we're level 95 and counting on our ability to pontificate and lord over the population.

      As Shakespeare might say:

      Permitting and permitting and permitting
      Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
      To the last syllable of recorded time;
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
      The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
      Freedom's but a walking shadow, a poor player
      That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
      And now is heard no more. It is a tale
      Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
      Signifying nothing.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Ever noticed by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only one nation has even managed to put a man on the MOON

      All those losers who studied the moon before we had spaceflight should have been doing something more productive, amirite?

      ...or the people here could be so introverted they do not care and are not even listening.

      you mean people such as yourself?

    4. Re:Ever noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it has ZERO potential to actually produce any benefit and therefore generate value in the economy

      So does posting stupid stuff to Slashdot, but people do it anyway.

    5. Re:Ever noticed by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      how truly pointless this stuff is? Sure, there are a few astronomy geeks who are able to make a living (from grants, rather than productive economic activity) studying this stuff, but it has ZERO potential to actually produce any benefit and therefore generate value in the economy...

      You bitching on the internet has ZERO potential to actually produce any benefit and therefore generate value int eh economy... so you you are pointless.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  8. So... by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    They gonna call it "Endor"?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  9. so the options are... by wbr1 · · Score: 1
    Its a moon

    Or

    "That's no moon"

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  10. neat-o by eyenot · · Score: 1

    There was this one time, when like, I thought this one thing was a bug, but when I got closer it was a pebble.

    Did I ever tell you about this one time when I thought I seriously fucked my toe up, but I only stubbed it?

    I remember once when I walked a long time, like it felt like tons of hours and miles, but it was only an hour and it was only like three miles. I dunno I guess I was tired.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee