Slashdot Mirror


Feds Grab 163 Web Sites, Snatch $21.6 Million In NFL Counterfeit Gear

coondoggie writes: "As they have for the past few years the US Customs department teamed with the National Football League to cut into the lucrative counterfeit sports gear market. In what the feds called 'Operation Team Player,' special agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and officers from Customs and Border Protection worked with the National Football League (NFL) and other sports leagues along with law enforcement agencies to identify illegal shipments imported into the U.S., as well as stores and vendors selling counterfeit trademarked items."

133 comments

  1. For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    title says it all

  2. It's all the same chinese shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably made in the exact same factory by the same people.
    I love how they call it counterfeit, like it's somehow of lesser quality than the chinese shit they sell themselves.

    1. Re:It's all the same chinese shit by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It quite well may be. One thing the Chinese do on request is quality control. The same factory churning out cheap electronics may very well be the same factory assembling expensive quality gear. The difference is the "counterfeits" may be the result of a skeleton crew working after hours to produce goods off the books. The first thing they get to do is ditch the oversight and quality control.

      It may well be the same product from the same factory but that doesn't necessarily mean the quality is the same. And yes it is possible to set the bar even lower than most brand name made in Chinese crap.

    2. Re:It's all the same chinese shit by westlake · · Score: 1

      It quite well may be. One thing the Chinese do on request is quality control.

      The other side of the coin is that legitimate Western retailers and corporate partners like the NHL don't like being called out for labor abuses abroad.

    3. Re:It's all the same chinese shit by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Many are indeed run off on the same machines that make the official product. This is, of course, a much graber problem for car or aircraft parts (which may often use cheaper metals) than shirts (though have you seen the average football fan lately?)

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:It's all the same chinese shit by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      Or it may well be that the quality control on the counterfeit merchandise is HIGHER than the QC for the official NFL. Just because the counterfeit is cheaper in price doesn't mean it is lower in quality. 90% of the price of the merchandise is the logo.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  3. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    The AFL-CIO, and any other union for that matter, is a non-profit organization with a lot of pull.

  4. The War on Sports Gear? by Lodlaiden · · Score: 2

    When was the last time we heard about a 21 million dollar drug bust?

    --
    Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
    1. Re:The War on Sports Gear? by N0Man74 · · Score: 2

      When was the last time we heard about a 21 million dollar drug bust?

      Forget that, when do we hear about billion dollar banking fraud busts?

    2. Re:The War on Sports Gear? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      When was the last time we heard about a 21 million dollar drug bust?

      Forget that, when do we hear about billion dollar banking fraud busts?

      Thank you! More like this please.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    3. Re: The War on Sports Gear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they using the street value or the NFL's inflated team store prices to determine how much the counterfeit equipment is worth?

      The drugs would probably actually be worth $21 million in street value.

    4. Re:The War on Sports Gear? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2

      When was the last time you heard about someone buying a counterfeit shirt, putting it on, then dying from it, or killing someone else?

      Oh, and various multi-million dollar drug busts:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
      http://www.abc6.com/story/2336...
      http://www.news.com.au/nationa...
      http://www.celebritynetworth.c...

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    5. Re:The War on Sports Gear? by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you heard about someone buying a counterfeit shirt, putting it on, then dying from it, or killing someone else?

      Betcha people would stop buying them. Too bad they aren't any different than the legit ones.

      --
      Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
    6. Re:The War on Sports Gear? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Every time they find a single joint. Have you not seen the values they place on drugs? Always grossly inflated.

  5. Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because counterfeit football merchandise is such a "clear and present danger" that it rates diverting resources from, you know, actual crime like bank robbery and human trafficking. Maybe the NFL should be made to hire its own private security for this kind of stuff so public law enforcement can get back to protecting the public!

    1. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why are you upset at customs agents doing their jobs?

    2. Re:Priorities by lxs · · Score: 1

      Because it's a pointless job.

    3. Re:Priorities by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Probably because they only seem to do their job for things like this. Toxic pet food gets through just fine.

    4. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because counterfeit football merchandise is such a "clear and present danger" that it rates diverting resources from, you know, actual crime like bank robbery and human trafficking. Maybe the NFL should be made to hire its own private security for this kind of stuff so public law enforcement can get back to protecting the public!

      We really don't want private corporation to own their paramilitary security and law enforcement agency. The NFL should just be told to fuck off. If they didnt sold their crap so overpriced, nobody would be able to undercut them so easily. They made themselves victim by exploiting the gullible sport fan.

      Professional sport get too much visibility anyway. It is really like McDonals Vs Burger King match. They do not represent city or country, there is no reason to cheer for them, there is no reason to care about them. The only reason the state tolerate such welfare leeches is be because they provide the games need to distract the plebeian from politic.

    5. Re:Priorities by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Why are you upset at customs agents doing their jobs?

      Because their job is to prevent dangerous contraband from entering the country.

      Instead, they are wasting the taxpayers' money doing bidding for private companies -- to attempt to curtail unauthorized sports memorabilia.

    6. Re:Priorities by anubi · · Score: 1

      Its only lucrative because we make it so...

      We seem to be so enamored by sports that we will pay for whatever someone markets as sports-related - for what reason I will never know. The whole concept of paying extra for some sports logo emblazoned on a coat or shirt completely escapes me. Even a Star Trek logo does not mean that much to me. If I want some marking on myself or my things, I will put it so myself. I will not mark other's stuff - that's called vandalism.

      ( I guess that's why I trained for engineering... its about the only thing I seem to understand. Why people will pay for stuff like this is completely beyond me; I cannot even stand having to sit through a game, much less pay attention to it. I would rather post on Slashdot. That oughta tell ya how low on my priorities a game is.... actually it does rank above doing my taxes - which I hate even worse. )

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    7. Re:Priorities by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Why people will pay for stuff like this is completely beyond me

      Ask a Texan politician, either party, given the ratio of spending on football compared to say - health or education, the answer should be interesting.

    8. Re:Priorities by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      so public law enforcement can get back to protecting the public!

      Will Goldilocks let down her hair too?* The modern state exists primarily to protect corporate profits. Anything else it does is just window dressing to set a level of tolerance among the people to perpetuate that state despite it acting against their best interests. This story is _entirely consistent with expectations_.

      "Why, that can't be true - if it were, there'd be a Snowden briefing on that! Oh."

      (* yes, I know, it's not right)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Priorities by nbauman · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm a nerd, I feel the same way.

      I never really liked team sports. I'd rather ride a bicycle.

      I do think I understand why people are into sports teams, though. It's a tribal ritual that seems to serve a function of group cohesiveness. I got that from reading the evolutionary biology stories in New Scientist and Science.

    10. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you upset at customs agents doing their jobs?

      Because their job is to prevent dangerous contraband from entering the country.

      Instead, they are wasting the taxpayers' money doing bidding for private companies -- to attempt
      to curtail unauthorized sports memorabilia.

      I see. So, arguably the biggest sporting event of the year that generates billions of dollars in merchandising for US resellers, should somehow NOT be a focus of attention in the month of January?

      Mind telling me exactly what the fuck they should be focused on this month, if their very job is to stop illegal trafficking of all kinds? Seems there's just a tiny bit of justification out there after a 20+ million-dollar bust, but hey, I could be wrong...

    11. Re:Priorities by Calydor · · Score: 1

      generates billions of dollars in merchandising for US resellers

      20+ million-dollar bust

      Seems to me like their efforts amount to a drop in the ocean, even if 20 million dollars is a lot of money.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    12. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      If the NFL is paying 100% of the full and total cost, fine.

      If my tax dollars are being used, then fuck the NFL.

    13. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I cannot even stand having to sit through a game,

      Probably because you derive no pleasure out of watching a bunch of millionaires chase a ball around a field.

    14. Re:Priorities by westlake · · Score: 2

      Mind telling me exactly what the fuck they should be focused on this month, if their very job is to stop illegal trafficking of all kinds? Seems there's just a tiny bit of justification out there after a 20+ million-dollar bust, but hey, I could be wrong...

      To put things in perspective, the total take from bank robbery in the US is around $30 million a year. Bank Robbery

    15. Re:Priorities by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I see. So, arguably the biggest sporting event of the year that generates billions of dollars in merchandising for US resellers, should somehow NOT be a focus of attention in the month of January?

      I am saying that the IPR enforcement should be restricted to goods that actually harm consumers and contain a meaningful misrepresentation about what the product is. For example: items that have substantial value per unit, such as fake Rolex. Or electronics phony branding.

      A "fake" T-shirt with a team logo actually directly benefits the people. The government is hurting people and adding more fuel to this "product with sports logos" racket, by giving welfare to these companies, at the expense of higher product prices for the American people.

    16. Re: Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A story I heard on the radio today about this claimed that the counterfeit goods were harming consumers by driving prices higher for legitimate shirts. I said WTF to myself. The counterfeit shirts, at lower prices, should drive prices overall down.

      The whole thing is a racket, though.

    17. Re:Priorities by Moral+Judgement · · Score: 1

      This is a pretty good point, but surely the reason why we disapprove of bank robbery isn't so much the financial loss (though that undoubtedly is an issue) but more the attendant violence associated with such a crime. That is we care about bank robberies because the people that commit them tend to commit assault and murder during the commission of said robberies. Whereas counterfeiting represents a purely financial loss; there is little sports memorabilia crime.

      What is more this isn't a financial loss like destroying a productive asset, such as a factory. The reason why counterfeit goods have value at all is because there is an artificial scarcity created by only certain parties being licensed to create official goods. While the creation of these goods may represent a nominal loss of $20 million to the licensed manufacturers, it isn't even a nominal loss of $20 million to the NFL, who only have to suffer reduced prices of licence fees (due to brand dilution caused by counterfeit products). An argument could even be made that counterfeiting enhances the value of branding; people only counterfeit desirable commodities, after all who counterfeits Walmart products? The point, I think, is that although someone can say that the value of goods seized if they had been sold as legitimate products would have been $20 million, it is difficult to quantify how much real harm has been experienced by anybody. Now the same is true of bank robberies; after all the $30 million stolen won't have been destroyed, hell it will most likely have been spent on goods and services. The purely financial loss of bank robberies seems related to the opportunity costs associated with insurance pay outs, which will be much less than the nominal $30 million sum. However, we put so much attention to catching bank robbers because people get shot in bank robberies the whole time, not cause we're concerned about productive losses.

    18. Re:Priorities by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I enjoy team sports as well as individual sports. I just don't enjoy watching either one unless I'm supporting someone I am personally involved with; like a child, friend, or family member.

    19. Re: Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My way of looking at it is similar. People pay extra money for merchandise, be it clothing, coolers, or kitchen utensils, that has the Coca-Cola logos on it. Me, I feel like they should pay me, or at least subsidise the price of the item, for it having their advertising on it.

    20. Re:Priorities by ancientt · · Score: 1

      Are you wanting to compare voluntary spending or involuntary spending?

      Some miniscule amount of tax money goes to defending sport franchises' rights, where a very significant percentage of the taxes people pay goes toward education.

      Now comparing voluntary spending on education to sports related spending would be a very interesting number indeed. People pay for college and private school but only some of them and generally only for a limited period of their life. The spending on sports is much more prevalent and is generally spread over a lifetime.

      Spending on health is another issue entirely, but voluntary verses involuntary numbers would indeed be interesting.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    21. Re:Priorities by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I would say a "Fake" T-shirt with a team logo directly benefits the team. Why should I have to pay for a shirt that advertises for your team? Shouldn't you be paying me? Of course, I buy neither official nor counterfeit NFL merchandise since I can't reach an advertising agreement with the NFL that we both find mutually beneficial.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    22. Re:Priorities by operagost · · Score: 1

      This. A few hundred pets die from melamine every year, and life goes on.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    23. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess - you also think we should stop space exploration because the money would be better spent on feeding every last hungry child on earth first.

      You fucking idiot.

    24. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, when you put it that way...

      I think we have "the next big thing" here. Get a bunch of investment bankers and politicians, and make them try to get a greased-up beach ball in to a goal. Surround them by thousands of screaming people, put it on TV. Hilarity ensues.

    25. Re:Priorities by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Right. If somebody I know is playing, I'm interested.

      Professional sports lose that.

      It's as if, instead of going to church, you watched a mega-church on TV.

    26. Re:Priorities by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0

      You do understand that the dog food is legally imported, right? Customs prevents illegal importation. The people you should be upset with are the FDA and the companies sell the dog food.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    27. Re:Priorities by sjames · · Score: 1

      Customs is also supposed to prevent importation of tainted goods. For example, shoes are legal to import, yet...

    28. Re:Priorities by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Are you wanting to compare voluntary spending or involuntary spending?

      Government spending.

      Go Aggies?

    29. Re:Priorities by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      TV.

      There's another thing I don't "get". Of course I fully understand dressing in the team products, painting my head, going to the game, and screaming abuse at the opposition supporters. 'Cause they are a bunch of superstitious losers, while we are winners, yeah!
      Go Aggies!

    30. Re: Priorities by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      I feel like they should pay me, or at least subsidise the price of the item, for it having their advertising on it.

      You're showing your age. Time was they did.

    31. Re:Priorities by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      the total take from bank robbery in the US is around $30 million a year.

      You mean when banks are robbed right? With a gun? Interesting.

    32. Re:Priorities by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Mind telling me exactly what the fuck they should be focused on this month, if their very job is to stop illegal trafficking of all kinds?

      Unsafe foods, and people smuggled in containers like cargo. Why should the government be the private security for a billionaires club?

    33. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > don't want private corporation to own their ...
      > Professional sport get too much visibility anyway

      Do you have some sort of religious objection to plurals?

    34. Re:Priorities by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Really? Next thing you know, you'll want the MPAA to bear the costs of finding people pirating movies, rather than having the Department of Homeland Security doing it at taxpayer expense.

      "If Google Glass is outlawed, only outlaws will have Google Glass."

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  6. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you mister feds for protecting us from those evil terrorist counterfit NFL gear. you're not in any way useless humans with pointless jobs.

    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now, if it were counterfeit FIFA gear and domains stealing from real football, now that would be a crime against humanity...

  7. Whew! by willoughby · · Score: 4, Funny

    I feel safer already!

    1. Re:Whew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is what "national security" means: Maintaining the political and economic status quo, even against the will of the people.

      Since they dropped law enforcement from their mission statement and donned "national security" the FBI won't have to worry about their actions exposed as they directly support de-facto communist corporate interests, not the people or the capitalism we're told is at play.

      Think about it: How capitalistic is it to confiscate a bunch of goods to prevent competition? The sportswear price is inflated because the state ensures a monopoly for the normalization the product. Hello, that's communism. In a free market capitalism the cheaper "counterfeits" would compete with the "official" sports gear on price, and quality, allowing the public access to a cheaper product for less money.

      The FBI prioritizes copyright issues over missing persons. You live in a corpro-communist dictatorship where your votes don't count.

    2. Re:Whew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I can agree with where you are coming from, I advise you learn more about Communism before you run around spouting off things like that.

    3. Re:Whew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you make assumptions about the experiences of others, consider that you don't know shit about them.

  8. Great article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Page 2 is my favorite!

    1. Re:Great article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's where the economic impact is stated...

  9. How??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Counterfit merchandise??? How could Richard Sherman let this happen??? He's a better human being than all of us put together. Just ask him.

  10. apropos nothing by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which country are the non-conterfeit items made in?

    1. Re:apropos nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point. It has nothing to do with where the crap is made. Probably made in the same place the counterfit stuff is made. The point is that the NFL doesn't get their cut of sales on the counterfit stuff. Just like you can't bring in your own food and drink into the stadium. It's the same food but the NFL and/or team doesn't get a cut of sales that allows them to pay the players $20M/year...

    2. Re:apropos nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TV rights and all the other shitty subsidies support their salaries you faggot.

    3. Re:apropos nothing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Which *factory* are the non-counterfeit items made in.

    4. Re:apropos nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the ridiculously expensive "ticket sales" to what is most likely taxpayer funded stadiums.

    5. Re:apropos nothing by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      The TV rights and all the other shitty subsidies support their salaries you faggot.

      I feel the anti-gay slur really enhanced your point.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  11. Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuff by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The jerseys (the good sewn ones) are simply way too expensive. They're upwards of $250-300 and taht's more than I'm spending on a player who might be with the team for 3-4 years. In fact, all the gear and items are obscenely inflated in price. However, the counterfeit stuff is hit or miss. I've got a Woodley jersey that looks like cartoon lettering was used for the player's name. Some items I'm sure are straight off the assembly line. Maybe they ran it another day and sold the extras on teh black market.

    The NFL can't be surprised this is happening. When Americans started to realized that goods were being produced at cutrate prices overseas and sold to us as a huge markup, lots of us gave the finger to tradition stores and elected to cut out the middle man as well. I'm probably being hypocritical based on my stand on illegal downloads, but I have no sympathy for Goodell's NFL.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  12. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    And I think for those that don't follow or care about the game and its hefty income...

    They're a billion dollar corporation, and yet are "tax exempt" and apparently can buy off Feds help to take down counterfeit NFL merchandise, making sure they can add a couple million more to there bottom line.

    They also hired there own "medical commission" to ignore the fact repeated head trauma causes brain disease, despite leading neurologists having slices of brain, and findings that suggest otherwise. Any contact sport really, PBS and Frontline ran a 2 part special over the NFL's denial..

    Pretty much a monopoly.

  13. More mission creep by putaro · · Score: 2

    Customer and Border Patrol should stick to enforcing customs laws AT THE BORDER. Once it's entered the country they should have no authority. We've also seen them trying to enforce copyright, as in the recent Google Glass case. They're already out of control at the borders with their warrantless searches, their authority should be rolled back, not expanded.

    1. Re:More mission creep by c4tp · · Score: 1

      Customer and Border Patrol

      Border Patrol is just a small part of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency. CBP mainly inspects people and goods that come into the U.S. through any port, whether it's by land, sea or air. So they have officers all over, and intercepting counterfeit imports is part of their mission. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is the other agency within DHS that has boots on the ground to find violators after they get past customs. They should be part of a task force to find illegal imports as well.

      Border Patrol is probably what you're thinking of, they are the ones actually patrolling the border. Or are you thinking of the TSA, which is yet another part of DHS?

  14. your tax dollars at work by stenvar · · Score: 1

    Your tax dollars subsidize the stadiums, the wealthy owners, the games, and their idiotic and useless "trademarks" too.

    Didn't we elect someone to stop crony capitalism? Oh, right: he's now the crony capitalist in chief.

    1. Re:your tax dollars at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't we elect someone to stop crony capitalism?

      But if we stop crony capitalism, it'll cost JERBS!

    2. Re:your tax dollars at work by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Your tax dollars subsidize the stadiums, the wealthy owners, the games, and their idiotic and useless "trademarks" too.

      Didn't we elect someone to stop crony capitalism? Oh, right: he's now the crony capitalist in chief.

      I have come to the conclusion that when a President takes office he either gets with the program or the program gets with him. Not entirely, of course. He can have an agenda, but he can't color too far outside the lines.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  15. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They also hired there own "medical commission" to ignore the fact repeated head trauma causes brain disease, despite leading neurologists having slices of brain, and findings that suggest otherwise. Any contact sport really, PBS and Frontline ran a 2 part special over the NFL's denial..

    Pretty much a monopoly.

    I really don't know why the NFL is going through all that trouble. Those elite professionals who even make it to the NFL know damn well the dangers of playing the game. It's not like ANY kid eligible for the NFL draft doesn't know this, or it's some big secret that you can get hurt or killed on the field. I know damn well the dangers of stepping into a 3,000-pound steel box and sending it hurtling down a freeway at 75MPH, inches from thousands of other steel boxes. I still get up and do it, every single day. Not just on Sundays for 3 months out of the year. Every single day.

    People put themselves in positions of danger for fucking minimum wage because they have to. These guys make millions of dollars every year for playing a game. A game they love. A game they've dedicated their lives to. I fail to understand the conspiracy here that does NOT carry over to sports equally as dangerous. It's like NASCAR hiring their own doctors to help disprove that concrete walls are deadly at 200MPH. Why the hell bother. We ALL know it's a dangerous sport. If the people engaged in the sport accept this, then who gives a shit.

  16. "Just the facts, ma'am." by westlake · · Score: 1

    Because counterfeit football merchandise is such a "clear and present danger" that it rates diverting resources from, you know, actual crime like bank robbery and human trafficking.

    "Actual crime" is what the law defines as crime.

    Crimes with an interstate or foreign dimension or a federal constitutional dimension become a federal responsibility.

    Clear and present danger was a doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech, press or assembly.

    Clear and present danger

    Law enforcement multi-tasks.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the largest investigative agency in the Department of Homeland Security, is responsible for enforcing the nation's immigration and customs laws. ICE has more than 20,000 employees working in 400 offices in the U.S. and around the world.

    Careers

    No law endorsement agency is an island.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

    With more than 42,000 frontline CBP officers and Border Patrol agents protecting nearly 7,000 miles of land border and 327 ports of entry --- including official crossings by land, air, and sea --- CBP is uniquely situated to deter and disrupt human trafficking.

    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

    USCIS helps protect victims of human trafficking and other crimes by providing immigration relief. Two types of immigration relief for victims of human trafficking and other crimes are available through USCIS: T Nonimmigrant Status (T Visa) and U Nonimmigrant Status (U Visa).

    Human Trafficking: Our Partners

    For a look at the reality of bank robbery in the U.S:

    Wanted Bank Robbers

    Google Map and 287 photographs of robberies in progress,

  17. Re:Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuf by stiggle · · Score: 2

    Often the manufacturers of the legitimate sportswear get a contract to make 10,000 shirts. So to cover the expected rejects, they make 12,000 shirts with the knowledge they'll have 10,000 good shirts to supply to the customer. Now what to do with the 2000 shirts they made extra and/or were rejected due to manufacturing issues (label upsidedown, etc) - they sell them on. They don't get the little hologram label saying its legit, but its made in the same factory by the same people, its just outside of the contracted numbers.

  18. Is the NFL paying Customs for their services? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not, the why the hell are my tax dollars going to assist a private, for profit, enterprise in their desire to increase their profits?

    1. Re:Is the NFL paying Customs for their services? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      If not, the why the hell are my tax dollars going to assist a private, for profit, enterprise in their desire to increase their profits?

      Actually, the NFL is a non-profit organization. So they don't even pay taxes for this enforcement!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:Is the NFL paying Customs for their services? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      With the exception of the Packers (who are, for the purposes of this discussion, owned by their city), the teams themselves though, of course, are for profit.

      It's just the ruling body - the league office - that's a non-profit. You can be a big business as a non-profit, and you can pay your employees well, but non-profit means exactly what it means. Goodell makes like 30mil, but the money the teams and players get is certainly not immune from taxes.

      Most of the money from the $200 jersey goes to the team, with the NFL (the organizing body) and the NFLPA taking their cuts to (a) manage the league, and (b) provide a player's organization.

      While you can certainly argue that the NFL (organizing body) shouldn't make so much money, it's hard to argue that they should have a goal for individual profit. Their goal is to grow and manage the league, for the benefit of the for-profit (and fully taxed) teams. If they're for-profit, then they have a direct interest in, for example, moving small market teams. [Moving a small market team might help Goodell himself, in that he's got hefty bonuses for his performance, but the NFL (organizing body) itself doesn't make more money -- since it doesn't make money -- by moving the Vikings to Tokyo.]

      Every big CEO, even those that work for non-profit companies, have bonuses.

  19. Three hots and a flop. by westlake · · Score: 1

    The modern state exists primarily to protect corporate profits. Anything else it does is just window dressing...

    I'll admit to being curious about how you manage to make a living.

    1. Re:Three hots and a flop. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Corporations can exist, and employ people, without owning the government like they do now.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:Three hots and a flop. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Corporations can exist, and employ people, without owning the government like they do now.

      They can only do that when government is so small as to make no difference. Big business and big government are two parts of the same organism, and rarely exist without the other.

      If the fastest way to get rich is to have your friends in the government give you billions of dollars of taxpayers' money, that's how many big corporations will make their living.

    3. Re:Three hots and a flop. by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      They can only do that when government is so small as to make no difference.

      You know, I keep hearing this claim, because a certain segment of the population cuddles the talking point to their breast like a teddy bear, but you know what? I've never seen any empirical evidence that there is any truth to the claim whatsoever. And in fact, I think it's false.

      I think that a government that is radically smaller than the largest organization it is supposed to regulate is incapable of regulating that organization because it can't keep up. For evidence, I point to the current state of affairs. I say, our bank regulators are understaffed. There should be more people with more government jobs specifically to regulate the banks, and because the part of the government that is supposed to do that job is so small, it's helpless to rein in behemoth multinational banks that can generate paper faster than a regulator can read it.

      You want your small government? Forbid megacorporations. Forbid too-big-to-fail. If a business gets bigger than its corresponding regulatory agency X 5 (we can argue about the scale factor), mandate that it be broken up, by law, no excuses, no dodges, no exceptions or exemptions, and only the most minimal of grace periods.

      I also think that small government is in no way immune to the corruption we currently see. On the contrary, if you look around at the world, small government corruption runs in lockstep with big government corruption. You get the same percentages, regardless of the size of the government entity. And this makes sense, because government organizations are made of people, and the percentage of people in the population who are morally bankrupt is the same for both.

      Or get over the small government lunacy, and admit that we need honest government, and the size should be whatever it takes to get the job done.

    4. Re:Three hots and a flop. by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      I've never seen any empirical evidence that there is any truth to the claim whatsoever. And in fact, I think it's false.

      Never seen as distinct from not found? Think as the result of reductive reasoning or just as a poor synonym for imagine?

      I imagine that a government that is radically smaller than the largest organization it is supposed to regulate is incapable of regulating that organization because it can't keep up.

      FTFY

      Unless... government "regulation" effectively licenses monopolies that stops the market from self-regulating business.

      I'm not sure if you're just a amateur sophist or a moron - but arguing that government regulation of business requires it to duplicate every single aspect of the business, therefore requiring the regulation process to match the size of business being regulated, is just, um, doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

      For evidence, I point to the current state of affairs. I say, our bank regulators are understaffed. There should be more people with more government jobs specifically to regulate the banks, and because the part of the government that is supposed to do that job is so small, it's helpless to rein in behemoth multinational banks that can generate paper faster than a regulator can read it.

      A selective interpretation that doesn't even allow for history is not evidence (it's just piss poor rationalisation). Government regulation of banks mostly amounts to stopping banks being competive. Historically government intervention was to remove the usury limitation that stopped banks charging more than 10% interest. Prior to that the loan sharks were the mob, now credit cards charge up to 30%. Those trillions "generated" are just transfers from Main St to Wall St, smoke and mirrors.

      You want your small government? Forbid megacorporations. Forbid too-big-to-fail.

      How do megacorporations exist without government - you know? Like American Fruit or West Indies Trading existing with the respective governments taking their money and supplying them with armies (probably some modern parallel but I can't any evidence with this box on my head). And excuse me for extrapolating but.. wouldn't the increased regulation to do that, um, increase government size. Not that I'm accusing you of sophism but... if it smells like a stawman sometimes you need to test if it's really straw (and my only tools are matches).

      As for "forbid to fail/bail out my contributors" - just don't. It's that simple. If the government needs to intervene in business with funding it should own (nationalise) the business - not give/loan it money.

  20. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by flyneye · · Score: 2

    The Feds involved cooperated so much for the PUBLICITY!
    Had it been some other copyright infringement, it may not have even happened.
    THIS, however, so close to the bowl, generates FREE PUBLICITY in the media.
    Kind of like when they send in a SWAT team to a K.C. burb to bust a yuppie household for marijuana because they ordered hydroponic equipment off the internet.
    No pot found, but they DID send those teabags to the lab and found themselves a whole lotta PUBLICITY, yup, the good ol boys, cleanin up the county for you.
    Lesson: Dont use legal hydroponics or the cops will raid your house, grow outside in the dirt during LEGAL growing seasons or the porkers will confiscate your tomatoes with extreme prejudice.
    They realize there is no such thing as bad publicity. Morons.....

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  21. Re:Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuf by Silentknyght · · Score: 1

    My brother's girlfriend got adventurous one christmas and purchased NFL jerseys from some shady chinese website. Reportedly, she got them for about $20 each, plus shipping. We gushed over them--and scrutinzed them carefully--as we couldn't believe the quality at the price she paid. After that experience, I'm 100% convinced they're not "counterfeit" in the manufacturing sense, but instead they're pulled straight from the line on which the same "$200" jerseys are made, and sold on the side.

  22. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by JeBradSus · · Score: 2

    But the NFL is accused of hiding the dangers of the game from the players. They withheld their own studies which showed links of repeated concussions to a variety of mental health illnesses:

    http://www.campbell-trial-lawy...

    From the above link:

    The NFL Committee did everything within its power to deny any causal link between multiple concussions and later-life cognitive decline. DeMaurice Smith, Executive Director of the NFLPA, described this NFL Committee policy: “[u]nfortunately, the NFL...diminished [independent] studies, [and] urged the suppression of [independent] findings...for years.

    This is more like NASCAR hiding evidence from its drivers that repeated neck strain from cornering quickly has severe life altering impacts as you age.

  23. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you also refrain from watching a bunch of millionaires play "Let's Pretend!" (aka acting) I'll give you credit for not being a hypocrite.

    Until then, I'll just assume you are a faggot.

  24. Dont shaft your own economy by PsyMan · · Score: 1

    So many high end brands move their production to China sending blueprints of their lucrative products to sweatshops and then wonder why the market suddenly gets flooded with counterfeit/perfect copies. They only really have themselves to blame for selling out their own countrys workers in the name of more profit. +1 for making them foot the customs bill though, hopefully at a vastly inflated rate plus expenses.

    1. Re:Dont shaft your own economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the new american way. Export the jobs to China and keep the profits in offshore accounts to avoid paying US taxes.

      But then RUN to the US government for protection, enforcement and court time all of which they haven't paid for.

  25. Note also that Feds destroy rather than donate by langelgjm · · Score: 2
    Due to a law passed after Hurricane Katrina, when trademark holders got upset that poor and displaced people were wearing counterfeit clothing, the feds have to destroy all the seized clothing rather than donate it to charity.

    China tends to donate seized counterfeit goods to charity. The US actually sued China at the WTO over this practice, and eventually lost.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  26. Re:Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Christmas a few years ago we got three 'china jerseys' for my 10 year old son because who wants to spend $100+ for a jersey, especially if it will only fit a year or two. $20 or so each, and I couldn't believe the quality. Sewn on lettering, numbers, etc. They also had Nike and NFL 'official' tags on them. (Yes, I know tags can be counterfeit as well). The Cam Newton jersey even had the 'Keep Pounding' embroidered in the inside collar. I was amazed, and looking at them would support your theory.

    The only downside: the other two were Wes Welker New England and Percy Harvin Minnesota... Both traded about three months after Christmas.

  27. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by Tokolosh · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a petition for that, with over 300,000 signatures. Go and add yours.

    http://www.change.org/petition...
    http://www.sacknfltaxbreaks.or...

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  28. Re:Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuf by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

    You're still purchasing a product from the manufacturer. Not the same as an illegal download.
    Potential copyright infringement, but that's more on the manufacturer. I want a #12 Jersey, and I might pay 50 bucks for it, regardless of where it comes from, but like you, I'm not shelling out 250+ for a shirt I wear once a week and do no work in.

    --
    Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
  29. Keep going by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    Way to go guys! Now go after Wall Street...

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  30. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by pnutjam · · Score: 2

    This goes back to a point I have made repeatedly. Wealthy people and corps should pay more taxes because they use our legal framework more often (and it's usually crafted to their benefit).

  31. Good way to stimulate the economy by Laxori666 · · Score: 1

    Shut down businesses comprising millions of dollars worth of economic activity.

  32. Who is it really costing? by unixcorn · · Score: 1

    From the article: "Counterfeit goods cost the global economy an estimated $250 billion each year. More than 1.2 million jobs in New Jersey, 900,000 jobs in Colorado and 1.2 million in the state of Washington depend on IP intensive industries meaning counterfeits have a direct impact on the economy in the home states of both teams and the host of the Super Bowl."
    How, exactly, do people purchasing a good cost the world economy anything? Someone makes a product and another person buys it, viola, you have an economy where none was before. What they really need to say is that counterfeit goods are costing some rich sports agent and their marketing team who prey on the simpletons who elevate athletes to superstar status. That would be the truth.

  33. Re: Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're lucky. The counterfeit windbreaker I saw someone wearing was pretty obvious that they'd cut some corners in the manufacturing... like leaving off the S at the end of the team name. The good part? It was in a European country and the guy wearing it probably didn't even know it was wrong.

  34. Re:Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuf by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

    The jerseys (the good sewn ones) are simply way too expensive. They're upwards of $250-300 and taht's more than I'm spending on a player who might be with the team for 3-4 years.

    Wait, an official NFL jersey costs $250-$300?? Fucking really? No wonder they need the government to enforce their monopoly!

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  35. thank god we are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the life threatening dangers of textile commerce.

  36. More versus Fair by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Wealthy people and corps should pay more taxes because they use our legal framework more often (and it's usually crafted to their benefit).

    They generally DO pay more taxes. The question is whether they pay a fair amount. What constitutes a "fair" amount is the matter under debate.

    1. Re:More versus Fair by pnutjam · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your (invalid) point and the straw man arguments I see you have seeded through this discussion.

      I'll have to tag this as one of Commissioner Goodell's accounts.

    2. Re:More versus Fair by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your (invalid) point and the straw man arguments I see you have seeded through this discussion.

      As opposed to your content free non-rebuttal?

      I'll have to tag this as one of Commissioner Goodell's accounts.

      Right. I'm sure Roger Goodell spends a lot of time on slashdot worried about what a bunch of nerds think of the NFL.

    3. Re:More versus Fair by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      A rich person pays more taxes in dollar amount than a middle-class person, sure, but in proportion to income the middle-class person is likely going to pay more. Whether corporations should pay income taxes is another discussion (they should and do pay property taxes).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:More versus Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They generally DO pay more taxes. The question is whether they pay a fair amount. What constitutes a "fair" amount is the matter under debate.

      They should pay more as a percentage of income instead of far far less like they do now. Social security tax caps at $100K. Rich people convert pay into capital gains for even lower rates. They add in lots of deductions and they end up paying a very small percent, while still using huge amounts of government resources.

    5. Re:More versus Fair by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      The taxes in the USA are regressive. As a top 10% wage earner, I paid about 10% in federal income tax, less than 20% total tax (including all federal, state, and local taxes). And the wealthy (the 1% people talk about) often pay much less than that, some even getting tax rebates. And most of the value of taxes goes to the rich.

  37. Real goods through unauthorized sources by sjbe · · Score: 1

    After that experience, I'm 100% convinced they're not "counterfeit" in the manufacturing sense, but instead they're pulled straight from the line on which the same "$200" jerseys are made, and sold on the side.

    Happens all the time actually. I've been to China and spoken with business owners there. It is ridiculously common for contract manufacturers to do exactly what you are describing. They'll make extra and simply divert some through a distribution channel other than what the customer intended.

  38. Buying Authentic is usually a mistake by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2

    I only buy counterfeit jerseys now and if you find the right source they're rarely much different from the real thing. The only "level" of jersey that shows a great deal of difference is the genuine "on-field" jersey that is supposed to be exactly like the one the players wear. In the case of those yes, the real ones are made of better, thicker material with stronger seams. I can get one for a fraction of the real price though that is almost indistinguishable from the real thing at 10 feet and that's all I care about. I own two real jerseys. Both cost upwards of $250 and both players are long gone from the team I follow. Won't make that mistake again. Buying a real jersey is something you do towards the end of a HoF players career, not on draft day before you know anything about them or the career they're going to have. It's so easy to waste your money on this stuff if you go authentic. Every year I contact "My man in China" via email and get his latest URL. he moves all the time and gets busted every now and then. He's back up in days at a new site and his jerseys are around $30 for a beautiful copy with all sewn letters/numbers. He has new players available within weeks (sometimes even days) of their coming to a team. I buy about 4-5 jerseys a year this way and when a player gets traded, or cut I don't get burned like I did before. What always amazes me is how good the fakes are. A really bad screen-printed pretend jersey at Academy is over $60 and I can get a great looking fake on-field jersey for $30. Who in the hell is guying the screen-printed crap? Every time they shut him down he pops back up. That's the new economic reality IP holders. Time to get your prices back to reality. If Keki in China can afford to crank out hundreds of thousands of jerseys like this and ship them in small packages all over the US then it's hard to miss that the NFL is fucking over it's fans with overpriced crap.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:Buying Authentic is usually a mistake by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      I made a plunge on a "real" jersey last year. A large part of my decision was finding a player I liked who had a high likelihood of being with the team in 5 years.

      For $300 jerseys, they should offer a trade/injury guarantee. :(

  39. Discretionary purchase by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Wait, an official NFL jersey costs $250-$300?? Fucking really? No wonder they need the government to enforce their monopoly!

    Sure because people are willing to pay that. It's not like anyone has a gun to their head when buying one. It's the very definition of a discretionary purchase.

    I think the people spend that much money on a jersey have a room temperature IQ but it's their money...

  40. Re:Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuf by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    Actually a lot of them don't do this anymore (pull them off the same line). That was a very common practice a few years ago where the company that produced the official product did so with the intention of running a "third shift" to make goods that would go unreported and sell them under the table. Now the guys making fakes (and nothing but fakes) are so good at what they do that something simple like an NFL logo is just too easy to copy perfectly. I buy them all the time and rarely ever see any kind of big gaff on their part. One exception was a jersey I ordered for a Saints fan friend who wanted to piggyback on my jersey order. He wanted a Pierre Thomas jersey for his wife and he got it. Problem was it came in as "THMOS" on the back of the jersey instead of "THOMAS". I told the people I ordered it from about it and they sent me a replacement, no questions asked. I was really surprised at that kind of customer support from basically a counterfeiter. Then we opened it and saw that it too said "THMOS" on the back. Oh well. Win some you lose some...

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  41. The cost of counterfeit goods by sjbe · · Score: 2

    How, exactly, do people purchasing a good cost the world economy anything?

    In a variety of ways depending on the nature of the counterfeit good. Some problems with counterfeits are more serious than others.

    1) Many counterfeit goods are produced by criminal (think Mafia, etc) organizations. Purchasing these goods subsidizes these organizations.
    2) Counterfeit goods weaken incentives to produce innovative and/or higher quality goods
    3) Many counterfeit goods are not produced to appropriate safety standards and constitute a health/safety hazard.
    4) Counterfeits undermine the relationship between customer and buyer as the buyer can no longer be sure of the product they are receiving
    5) Counterfeits damage brand reputations and value (and yes these are important)
    6) Counterfeits weaken incentives to conduct research and development. No point in paying for research if everyone else doesn't have to.
    7) Many counterfeit goods are not produced to appropriate performance and quality standards. Some are outright frauds such as placebo pills.

    1. Re:The cost of counterfeit goods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Riiight.

      1) Many counterfeit goods are produced by the same factory that produced the originals (extended runs, etc)
      2) Counterfeit goods weaken incentives to produce innovative and/or higher quality goods (somewhat true)
      3) Many counterfeit goods are not produced to appropriate safety standards and constitute a health/safety hazard. (you mean the counterfit shirts are "unsafe"?)
      4) Counterfeits undermine the relationship between customer and buyer as the buyer can no longer be sure of the product they are receiving (if you got your shirt on a street corner i think you know its not real).
      5) Counterfeits damage brand reputations and value (and yes these are important) (Yes, that is what allows one firm to charge a huge premium).
      6) Counterfeits weaken incentives to conduct research and development. No point in paying for research if everyone else doesn't have to. (because the NFL has a huge R&D lab?)
      7) Many counterfeit goods are not produced to appropriate performance and quality standards. Some are outright frauds such as placebo pills. (Some are the same material, from the same factory using the same third world labour as the originals).

  42. Free Rider Problem by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I love how they call it counterfeit, like it's somehow of lesser quality than the chinese shit they sell themselves.

    It might be the identical product off the same line but when you buy something you aren't just paying for the good itself. You are paying for a brand and what that implies including the entire process of how that product is delivered to you and who stands behind it if there is a problem with it. Counterfeit goods are a problem because of the free rider problem. If you can solve that problem then you might have a point.

    The problem is that those people selling it out the back door don't have to pay for advertising, product development, brand development, R&D or any of a number of other costs that make it worthwhile to sell that product in the first place.

    1. Re:Free Rider Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is that those people selling it out the back door don't have to pay for advertising, product development, brand development, R&D or any of a number of other costs that make it worthwhile to sell that product in the first place.

      That's not the actual problem. The buyers that are buying it out the back door generally know that it is counterfeit. They are generally aware that the guy selling out of his hatchback is NOT selling "official" merchandise. The customers aren't getting deceived or defrauded; they are handing over their money because they WANT to buy the $7.50 counterfeit instead of the $75 authentic jersey. The customer knows he's not paying for the brand and knows he's not getting the added value of the real thing.

      The real problem is that the counterfeit is a functional substitute for the authentic merchandise. The product can be examined pre-sale, and if the counterfeit is well-stitched and durable, that is sufficient. You don't need a company to warranty a football jersey. It's not like, say, counterfeit Viagra, where the customer lacks the means to inspect the product. The NFL wants to charge $67.50 for added value of their brand, but in the context of a piece of clothing, the fair-market marginal value would only be about a dollar. They only way they can charge 60x the value is through an artificial monopoly supported by trademark law. That creates what's called a "deadweight loss" on the market, and induces the illegal activity.

  43. It's not just the logo - it is what the logo means by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Or it may well be that the quality control on the counterfeit merchandise is HIGHER than the QC for the official NFL. Just because the counterfeit is cheaper in price doesn't mean it is lower in quality. 90% of the price of the merchandise is the logo.

    Two problems with that. First is that if you haven't addressed the free rider problem. There are lots of costs besides simply the cost of manufacturing the good. Advertising, distribution, brand building, R&D, marketing, etc. These are very significant and the counterfeiters do not have to pay them but still reap the benefits of them. That is a HUGE problem and is 100% of the reason we have patents and copyright.

    The second is that the reason the logo has value is because of the relationship between the customer and the seller. Counterfeit goods often damage that relationship. If I buy something I want to be sure it is exactly what I thought it was. I want to be sure of who made it, where they made it, how they made it and what they will do to stand behind it. Sometimes those things are important to me and if I cannot be sure of those things then the person selling them is committing a fraud. Maybe sometimes we are ok with knowing that something is a knockoff but most of the time there is a lot more to be lost by condoning counterfeit goods than there is by allowing them.

    Think of it this way. If someone who looked kind of similar to you (maybe eerily similar) showed up at your place of work tomorrow and started working your job and collecting your paycheck despite never having had to pay for your education, would you be ok with that? Same situation here. Someone has invested a lot of time and money and resources into developing and making that product and then someone else simply copies their work without having to do the hard and expensive bits and claims it as their own. If you cannot figure out why that is a bad thing then I'm not sure you'll ever understand economics.

  44. can't have it both ways by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Corporations want to be free to exploit cheap labor in developing countries. Well, developing countries want to exploit the demand and deep pockets of the first world. Counterfeits are a natural and essential part of a true competitive market. But corporations would rather operate under an imperialist market, where they use the force of big government to control the flow of goods and capital.

    1. Re:can't have it both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is funny is when the "early america" was doing this to the "establishment" it was cheered as being "good for the nation".

      Now it is China doing it to the US it is "bad"?

  45. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by Kilo+Kilo · · Score: 0

    Those elite professionals who even make it to the NFL

    Have you ever heard a football player speak? I don't really want to defend these idiots, but I think that some of them might not understand the severity of the trauma they're subjecting their bodies to. Most probably are too stupid to care, but they are actually getting hurt at work and their employer is denying that the job is causing the injury.

  46. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by Kilo+Kilo · · Score: 1

    So now they can put on their cars:

    "ICE is the official police force of the NFL"

  47. Pro sports will be the death of the West by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. American jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the article, an official justifies the sting by saying they are protecting American jobs. What a joke. How many American jobs are protected by protecting merchandise made in China? The real issue here is the money that doesn't make it to NFL franchise coffers.

    1. Re:American jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wont someone think of the three leters (Cio, CEO...) and the players earning millions and millions of dollars?

      Sure, a lot of low level pond-scum lost their jobs so the stuff could be made in China for MUCH less but that is no reason why:
      - The prices should be a lot lower since the cost to manufacture has falling so much. Why pass the savings to the consumers?
      - The government should not spend tax dollars defending the monopoly. \

      The idea that the NHL is tax exempt and therefor doesnt even pay for enforcement via its taxes is just an added bonus.

  49. Re:It's not just the logo - it is what the logo me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen college stores selling sweatshirts. There were two versions, the regular one and the "Champion" logo version. They were the same sweatshirt but the one with the logo was more expensive. If you bought the one with the logo, they took a regular sweatshirt and ironed on a champion logo. I haven't bought a "logo" piece of merchandise since.

  50. The Dept. of Homeland Security strikes again. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Keeping all the most important "people" in America (at least, people on paper) safe.

  51. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by Shagg · · Score: 1

    Yes, but now that the information is out there, how many current players have retired early because of it? Only one that I've heard of. Whether or not the NFL deliberately hid information from past players probably wouldn't have made any difference either.

    --
    Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  52. Re:Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuf by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    So, instead of just doing without, you pay someone else for a crappy knockoff and still look like you are supporting the people you claim to be mad at. Good job.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  53. Re:It's not just the logo - it is what the logo me by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I agree with you but caution your use of that analogy.

    To complete your analogy you'd have to state that your education took 5 minutes and cost you almost nothing. That changes the equation a bit, especially regarding corporate empathy.

    Honestly I find it very hard to side with a company who lives up to nothing but it's name. This isn't years of hard effort, it's 5 minutes slapping a logo on a shirt often within restrictions of a strict set of colours and patterns which may be used. I don't really feel for them when someone copies their "hard work".

    Now designing a clever new set of electronics or a fancy new way of doing something maybe, creating shirts that a reasonably priced with some awesome designs on them like the kine you see at Threadless, yes, but slap a logo on something and charge 6x the normal cost? No wonder they are such a target for counterfeiters.

  54. Re:For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pul by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    The Republican Party is also a non-profit, as is the Democratic Party.

    Being a non-profit doesn't make one charitable.

  55. Re:Big sports fan and I've bought counterfeit stuf by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    You don't get sports, do you. It's about a fun camaraderie among fellow fans. I'm not wearing a jersey to support the NFL or the owner or the commissioner. I'm wearing it for my team and that player. If you don't get it, some people think you're just as stupid for shelling out $300 more for a high-end graphics card.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  56. Re:It's not just the logo - it is what the logo me by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    There is no free rider problem. That billionaires are whining about some Chinese shop making $0.10 off a shirt that didn't give the NFL billionaires 90% profit isn't a "problem". Are you asserting that the counterfeit merchandise manufactured in China is shipped by the NFL, then stolen in the USA for sale?

    You are defending the billionaire's loss, when we don't see one in the first place.

  57. Re: For A Non-Profit, The NFL Sure Has A Lot Of Pu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taxes are paid at the team level. Otherwise it would be double taxation. Each team shares in the NFL revenue. It's why small market teams can even survive.