Slashdot Mirror


Spooks-as-a-Service Swarm RSA Conference

itwbennett writes "As the list of victims of sophisticated cyber attacks expands, so does the need for specialized, high-priced, and hard-to-find talent to help investigate and recover from those attacks. The latest solution: hosted services offering access to cyber intelligence and incident response. 'At the RSA Security Conference this week, companies large and small are trumpeting the spy agency connections of senior staff as never before,' writes Paul Roberts. 'These new offerings — think of them as spooks-as-a-service — typically combine some degree of network and endpoint monitoring with a cloud-based management platform to gather and analyze data against data aggregated from other customers and third-party threat intelligence.'"

38 comments

  1. What, me worry? Mad Magazine called it... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Spy vs. Spy slapstick at it's finest.

    This world is getting so ludicrous, it makes those 1970's acid trips seem tame in comparison.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  2. Don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aren't the spy agencies the ones doing most of the cyberattacks ?
    Why do I want them associated with my security company ?

    1. Re: Don't understand by gruntspeak · · Score: 1

      What you need is a Tracebuster-buster, yo.

    2. Re:Don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Aren't the spy agencies the ones doing most of the cyberattacks ?
      Why do I want them associated with my security company ?

      That's a nice little network you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.

    3. Re: Don't understand by anubi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In this modern land of anything goes I offer what we all need is a good, solid, minimal, and highly secure PUBLIC foundation system, of which we are all made very aware of exactly how it works, much like I had to "suffer" through years of English classes. Such a system would include a knowledge of HTML, TCP/IP, and a basic windowing system. Have this core system thoroughly understood and bug-free.

      If webmasters conform to this, we should be able to limit the amount of hostile code released as there is no receptor for it in our machines, however any webmaster putting stuff on the internet requiring extensions and whatever will take the same risk as those distributing halloween candy to kids.... make those "hold harmless" clauses about as effective as someone distributing razor blades in apples and handing that to kids.

      That little business phrase of "<insert applet here> required to view this page" would mean that business accepts FULL and UNLIMITED LIABILITY for mischief carried an any applet he required, just as anyone passing candy to kids also accepts full liability for what is in it.. Even requiring pop-ups would mean the business requiring the pop-ups agrees to full liability for anyone misled by an errant popup - even if that popup did not come from his site. I believe by now all of us see how pop-ups can be used for all sorts of phishing work, as once some hapless user is on some business site, he has to answer whatever the popup asks to make it go away. The popup may look real, but it could be just a planted bug to use the trust a customer had for a business.

      I get the very strong idea that such a move would have a very chilling effect on the proliferation of hostile code when the ones who are encouraging its vectors to be installed are also compelled to accept liability for its actions.

      If there is computing to be done, that oughta be done on the server side. In my mind, the client should be considered as dumb as a bag of rocks, only capable of sending and receiving data. It seems terribly risky to me to be running any sort of arbitrary code provided from "someone on the internet".

      I know there will be cries of "assigning responsibility will be bad for business", however I assert that that is the kind of business I would be better off not having.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    4. Re:Don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't the spy agencies the ones doing most of the cyberattacks ?
      Why do I want them associated with my security company ?

      Because they are the experts. You would be a fool not to take their expertise. Why would I want the services of your security company if you don't?

  3. NSA rules all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Accept your Masters and you will feel much better.

  4. Re:What, me worry? Mad Magazine called it... by gIobaljustin · · Score: 1

    That might be the case, but it might also not be the case.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  5. FUD sells by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 4, Informative


    With all due respect, but most companies don't need this, they need to get and keep their IT secured and that should be enough.
    If you *do* need this, you may not want to rely on a third party to provide you with this sort of service. Your assets are probably way too valuable to solely rely on a third party. The only reason you may want them is to keep tabs on the performance of your own resident spooks and SpookWare(tm), not to entrust the future of your company upon. While I do see a place in the market for these companies, the way they sell themselves is despicable and makes companies act lax and irresponsible towards having their security sorted out properly.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  6. Ex-STASI swarm the conference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fixed the title for you

  7. Cyber-war Profiteering by Burz · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's what it sounds like: Playing both sides.

    1. Re: Cyber-war Profiteering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Government is putting my kids through college.

  8. Cybereason has a cool video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mentioned in the article, the company has a cool video showing how hacking works:
    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8iUUirFjW5s

  9. WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Regardless of your connections as a businessman, you're not getting information out of a spy agency.

    I also would trust anyone who claimed they could.

    I also wouldn't trust the spy agencies not to be behind this as well.

    1. Re:WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly what makes you think that spy agencies won't give information to corporations?

    2. Re:WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. Besides companies like Kroll Assoc et al, who've been in the corporate spy business for decades, now it's the 'fusion centers' that complete the 2-way info-sharing hand-shake on surveilance street.

  10. It's never a slapstick by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    Spy vs. Spy slapstick at it's finest.

    Before this, whatever we put online we have to worry about the spooks from China as well as the spooks from NSA.

    Now, we have to worry about the spooks from China, spooks from NSA, and the RESIDENT spooks.

    Whatever you want to call it - progression or regression - I call it scary.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:It's never a slapstick by icebike · · Score: 1

      Now, we have to worry about the spooks from China, spooks from NSA, and the RESIDENT spooks.

      I agree, hiring someone who wasn't good enough to keep his job at the NSA/CIA to protect your business, seems sort of crazy. They can't even use the knowledge they might have gained while employed there. Employing one of these guys probably attracts more interest in your network from those three letter agencies.

      And farming out yet more of your network to cloud providers and web based services just seems risky. Web based! Nobody has broken SSL right?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  11. Live long and prosper by Zardus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read that as "Spocks-as-a-Service". That'd be a waay cooler market.

    --
    You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    1. Re:Live long and prosper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I suppose you mean S'chn T'gai / Carl / Harold. Not Benjamin, then? Ok, great.

    2. Re:Live long and prosper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (arches right eyebrow) Fascinating.

  12. Two options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either unplug completely, or become a full time hacker! The digital world is so intermixed with economics that everyone will need black-hat cyber-warfair battle skills for basic survival! It's appearantly a free for all, crazy, just crazy... I say take a hammer to the box, and physically smash it!

  13. ISIS called by drewsup · · Score: 1

    They want Archer back !
    in all seriousness, will this lead to multiple independent spy agencies ala Control, KAOS, ISIS? That cant be a good thing.

  14. NSA conference by Threni · · Score: 2

    No-one's ever going to trust the NS..sorry, RSA again - might as well big-up the whole "we're in it together" thing while it lasts.

  15. Refresh My Memory, Please... by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

    What was it you called a country where the government and powerful, "connected" private business interests merge?

    Ohhh, silly me! *Now* I remember!

    A Fascist Oligarchy, of course!

    Welcome to the DRNA comrades! (Democratic Republic of North America) The new flag will be a black silhouette of a boot stomping a human face on a blood-red background.

    Just wait until they run out of money they can rape from the domestic economy and begin a policy of international aggression to keep their hookers and blow flowing. The world is going to burn.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  16. Re:What, me worry? Mad Magazine called it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Senior staff having spy agency connections turns my money to the direction of other providers. Selling their services to custom projects for the spy agencies doesn't, however, as long as they firewall their government businesses from the rest of market.

  17. The old revolving door trick by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    I just hope this doesn't become the IT equivalent of defense contractor morphing into DOD consultant and then back again.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  18. reformed? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Why would you trust one of these clowns? This is kind of like trusting a 'reformed' black hat.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  19. Outspooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like 70's and 80's banana republics, where every larger business had to have a one or more generals or colonels on its Board, in order to gain "business agility". Even small businesses and individuals usually saw it expedient to gain access to some retired military officer - to smooth over necessary procedures and eventual "misunderstandings". Such as having a kid arrested on a whim, or because of a jealous neighbor, etc., by thugs demoralizing their uniformas inside-out.

    Congratulations. Thugs for hire. Corporate, or "business" verion. Or, rather, "simply honest businessmen" version. As below, so "above". The same scam. It's a gangster Board. And, using the past to foresee the present it's backsliding into : "It gets even worse. Losing the metaphorical House, while trying to hold on to the devalued (I mean, inflated. No, devalued!) pennies.

  20. Next: 'flash crash' from 'intelligence' feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember how the markets escalated themselves down to a collapse when lots of automated trading programs, all watching each other's moves, made market buys and sells in a stupendous hurry and followed each other off a cliff?

    Now imagine how the politics will escalate into hell as the automated spying programs watch each other.

    One, two, four, eight, sixteen little actions ... after a while it's real trouble.

  21. say what? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    The one and only definition I know for the word spooks is an offensive, racist term for black people. What exactly are they using it for?

    1. Re: say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you, sir, need to extend your vocabulary.

    2. Re:say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're illiterate doesn't mean everyone else is.

      "Spook" is a time-honored (at least back to the beginnings of the Cold War, probably far older) term for anyone in the spy business.

  22. Treadstone 71 and SYNCSTATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the real deal here. Spoke with these guys at the con. Know their stuff and have a legacy running back 8 years