Slashdot Mirror


The Spy In Our Living Room

An anonymous reader writes "Ben Kuchera at Polygon ponders the surveillance capabilities of our gaming consoles in light of recent NSA and GCHQ revelations. 'Xbox One Kinect can see in the dark. It can keep a moving human being in focus without motors. It knows how to isolate voices from background noise. The privacy implications of having a device that originally couldn't be removed pointed at your living room at all times was always kind of scary, and that fear has been at least partially justified.' Kuchera, like many of us, habitually disconnects cameras and microphones not currently in use. But he also feels a sense of inevitability about the whole thing: 'If the government wants this information they're going to get it, no matter what we do with our gaming consoles. It's important to pay attention to what our government is doing, but this issue is much bigger than our gaming consoles, and we open ourselves up to much greater forms of intrusion on a daily basis.'"

148 comments

  1. 1984 by slapout · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reminds me of the TVs in "1984".

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:1984 by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      TV's of 1984 or 2014? Some new smart TV's have cameras and mics for Skype, Microphones in the remotes for voice. My LG can snap screenshots from the mobile phone app, newer models can stream video. It knows what you watch and can (and was, without notification) send that info home. Screw the consoles, the TVs themselves may be monitoring us.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:1984 by binarylarry · · Score: 2

      "I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you do that. Great job in that last round of bowling though."

      http://www.gadgetguy.com.au/cm...

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Soviet America, TV watches you !

    4. Re:1984 by zerro · · Score: 2

      In Kapitalist Amerika, TV watches YOU!

    5. Re:1984 by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      +1 I think this is the first time this joke has been on-topic and relevant!

    6. Re:1984 by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That joke has been on topic and relevant for almost 20 years now at least..and becoming more relevant in so-called 'free' countries every day.

    7. Re:1984 by memnock · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ... But he also feels a sense of inevitability about the whole thing: 'If the government wants this information they're going to get it, no matter what we do with our gaming consoles. ...

      Sure, if you keep thinking it's okay to keep your mouth shut and roll over. I suppose though that at least he is writing about this and spreading the word, so he's not just keeping his mouth shut.

      But the way he makes it seem like a foregone conclusion to me just doesn't sit well with me.

    8. Re:1984 by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      All indications are it is worse than that, "Dave, um, you broke the law, they say I will have to report you unless you do all of the following, report on your neighbours, attend the 'right' political rallies and functions and vote the right way'. "Dave a new list of instruction will be provided to you regularly and you will obey else you will be prosecuted for a range of crimes and sentenced to extended imprisonment, we have the selectively edited evidence, we know when you did not have a alibi and how the matches crimes in the area and we have added in some extras".

      Once monitoring breached the law it was no longer about maintaining the law it was all about power and control, shifting that power and control to the heads of those agencies and their corporate backers. Hiding crimes, fabricating crimes, extortion to force obedience, removing uncooperative people, using the courts as punishments in false prosecutions. How bad was it, hmm, none, not one of the criminals who perpetrated those criminal activities has been punished in any way shape or form and in the only persons targeted to date are those that reported the criminal activities. It really is that bad and, there is a real and present danger right now.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from that America is not an equal but a fashist and capitalist society, so "Capitalist America" would be more justified.

    10. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't confuse corporatism with capitalism.

    11. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember Max Headroom and how they did something like this for adverts?

    12. Re:1984 by AlfaMike · · Score: 1

      Turning the lights off was described as a way to escape the TV in 1984. Apparently that doesn't even work for the xbox one so it's worse.

    13. Re:1984 by Devoidoid · · Score: 1

      As I recall in Max Headroom it was illegal to turn off your television. Some people got a bit of respite by throwing a blanket over their set. This was to ensure you kept watching, it didn't have anything to do with the system's surveillance capabilities, whose only obvious manifestation I think was that Max could see and hear through any monitor. Of course in the quaint world of twenty minutes into the future, the set had to be on. Now, we know that that's just silly.

  2. Yea, another NSA Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How many does that make today? I've lost count.

    1. Re:Yea, another NSA Article by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 0

      Are you tired of people being made to think about how to safeguard their freedom, coward? Here's a solution: you should leave Slashdot and never come back.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    2. Re:Yea, another NSA Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you tired of people being made to think about how to safeguard their freedom, coward? Here's a solution: you should leave Slashdot and never come back.

      If you're such a badass, why don't you post your REAL name and home address, bitch ?

    3. Re:Yea, another NSA Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because you already have it, NSA-fag.

    4. Re:Yea, another NSA Article by StevenMaurer · · Score: 1

      This entire thread is actually making me want to not come back to Slashdot.

      Go slapfight somewhere else

  3. I wonder about the legality though by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What if I put an XBox360 in a locked room with no windows, turned it on with a kinect camera pointing at a sign which threatens a top political figure. If someone acts on it, how would they justify their actions? Legally it would be extremely questionable and ultimately, it would not be a threat as much as it would be a trap for the government to fall into. After all, discovery would result in all manner of details which should enter public record. ...or I could disappear into a puff of darkness.

    1. Re:I wonder about the legality though by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What if I put an XBox360 in a locked room with no windows, turned it on with a kinect camera pointing at a sign which threatens a top political figure. If someone acts on it, how would they justify their actions? Legally it would be extremely questionable and ultimately, it would not be a threat as much as it would be a trap for the government to fall into. After all, discovery would result in all manner of details which should enter public record. ...or I could disappear into a puff of darkness.

      It would be one hell of an entertaining story for your cellmate in Guantanamo.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:I wonder about the legality though by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Legality? What does that matter any more? That will be decided in a secret court anyway.

      . . . and no, the secret court is not going to inform you how it decided, either.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:I wonder about the legality though by kuhnto · · Score: 1

      Along this same line of thought, why doesn't somewone setup a long term experiment and wireshark all the data that is coming out of the new xbox? Lets see what is being sent out or not. True, it will most likely be encrypted, but at least some traffic analysis woud be interesting. And large bursts of data? Any activity when someone walks in?

      --
      "A 'person' is smart. 'People' are dumb, panicky animals and you know that."
    4. Re:I wonder about the legality though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guarantee you that the Kinect does not transfer that kind of information to Microsoft since it will be caught and there will be outrage.

      Obviously, if they were planning on using the device to spy on people, it'd be for extremely targeted operations, activating monitoring mode only for certain people, and therefore not likely to be discovered.

    5. Re:I wonder about the legality though by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What if I put an XBox360 in a locked room with no windows, turned it on with a kinect camera pointing at a sign which threatens a top political figure.

      Ten bucks if you try it right now and post the video.

      Legally it would be extremely questionable

      Oh, I'm sure that's gonna stop the NSA. Shall we find out?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:I wonder about the legality though by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      The NSA was never here, we just happened to be passing a sniffer patrol unit infront of your house, the dog barked so we got a warrant, didn't find any drugs after we broke down the door, but we did find one hell of a sign.

    7. Re:I wonder about the legality though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things don't work that way now. They would simply lock this person away indefinitely and without trial, under the p@7R!O7 aC7.

    8. Re:I wonder about the legality though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI actually trains police officers on exactly that: How to hide the fact that the information tip came from surveillance. They will find a way to make it look like you made a threat in a public place at some point. They literally do it every day.

           

    9. Re:I wonder about the legality though by s.petry · · Score: 1

      This is a pathetic attempt at shilling, no free donuts for one month!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    10. Re:I wonder about the legality though by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Everyone is guilty of something, most infractions just go unnoticed by the legal system. The law now merely takes the stance that you are guilty unless you're worth enough to be excused as innocent. No, the police state will not tell you how they came by their evidence, it was constructed by making laws against nature itself.

      I mean, just imagine it: Organisms, made of trillions of nearly identical sub-units, that are subject to Copyrights! Never mind that sharing information is the foundation of our species claim to fame... That's just one example, take a look at laws that affect courtship or (natural) death if you want some real insanity. The only thing that could protect citizens was law books so thick the court wouldn't know whether you were innocent or not until they spent the time processing your guilt in court (and thus increased the size of the law via case-law) -- The government is tired of the red tape, and so they've came up with a short cut around it all. Hell, now they can just claim you're a terrorist or subversive person or threat to national security (whatever that is) and avoid the courts altogether.

      Personally, I think if we're going to take this guilty until proven innocent thing seriously we should just forgo the artificial laws of due process and lock everyone in a dank dark cell for a while. The aggregate imprisonment of all for, say nine months, should be payment enough to cover even the most egregious of offenses when you consider the unwarranted imprisonment of the less guilty. Preferably the sentence could be carried out before they're even admitted to society and considered alive -- We'll call that a person's "due date" -- and that way everyone would start off with a clean slate fully innocent. Hell, might as well wipe their firmware too; Or better yet: compress their encoding such that they can't conceive memories in the first place!

      Thus ended the era of Intangible Thought Machines, only to be born anew as 'pure organics'. The cycle of Total Information Awareness has all happened before, and will all happen again.

    11. Re:I wonder about the legality though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is assuming the people who deal with intelligence are fscking stupid. they are not. thanks for not contributing anything useful to the conversation and karma whoring, whore. go somewhere else please, and leave real discourse to the actual people.

    12. Re:I wonder about the legality though by Mockylock · · Score: 1

      What if you did the same with a camera on an ipad, cell phone, or any other camera enabled device?

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    13. Re:I wonder about the legality though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is an example of where people did that very thing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHmP_KtmcB4

  4. BS by mbone · · Score: 1

    'If the government wants this information they're going to get it, no matter what we do with our gaming consoles.

    More pernicious BS I have never heard. By the same token, there is no reason to use either door-locks or condoms.

    BTW, I do not have a Kinect and have covers on all web-enabled cameras, including the one in my laptop.

    1. Re:BS by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

      The door lock analogy works best, I think: if there is something really valuable in the house, a door lock won't stop a thief, but for an average house a good lock could make it not worth the effort. Likewise, if my government (the Netherlands has a population of almost 17 million) can afford to spy on a thousand people, I won't be among them, but if they can afford to spy on a million people, I might be. So if you want privacy, make sure mass spying does not become too easy.

    2. Re:BS by Altrag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The door lock analogy has been broken with things like PRISM now verified to exist.

      The analogy is now more along the lines of every door lock being built to allow a single planet-wide master key and employing millions of people to rummage through your things every couple of hours to see if you've added anything they don't like (note: not necessarily illegal!) to your list of possessions.

      The problem though isn't that they're going to find something and come after you right now -- everyone's got something they should hide (whether they think so or not) and there's not enough agents in the world to nail every person out there.

      The problem is that they'll find something and store it away so that IF they ever decide to come after you for any reason in the future, they'll have something on you. I mean sure the filters will be looking for absolutely blatantly obvious stuff like Googling for a bunch of bomb ingredients consecutively (needs to have a plausible justification for its existence) but for the most part, the real goal is just to dig up dirt on everyone so that nobody can ever be completely free from fear of prosecution and/or blackmail.

  5. ...and that's why I don't have a Kinect or PS Eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft and the like can track what games I own (fine), what DLC I download (fine), what searches I do (fine), what music I listen to or movies I watch (fine)

    But when they want to scan my room, listen to what I say? I ask, why would I want to buy an overpriced gimmicky motion controller that so obviously does more than just track my gestures.

    Microsoft started failing by pushing ads through my connection, against my will, and charged me for the pleasure. I can only imagine what they're getting out of the Kinect.

  6. Well arguably it can't see in the dark by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    Last I checked the way kinect works is it basically shines an infrared light that you can't see but the cameras can. It uses this light to illuminate things. BTW, your cell phone's camera can also see in infrared. (As can the sensor on the Wii.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:Well arguably it can't see in the dark by JStyle · · Score: 1

      Note that the wii sensor bar is only infrared LEDs. The camera is in the wii remote itself. It is also shielded by a infrared filter, so not much visible light makes it in there. Footage would be nearly useless as the remotes are generally pointed at the TV or flailing about.

    2. Re:Well arguably it can't see in the dark by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      An image taken in IR is as good as the resolution of the camera. Of course, some details important details will be missing, but many ordinary photographs also miss important details.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    3. Re:Well arguably it can't see in the dark by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      Note that the wii sensor bar is only infrared LEDs. The camera is in the wii remote itself. It is also shielded by a infrared filter, so not much visible light makes it in there. Footage would be nearly useless as the remotes are generally pointed at the TV or flailing about.

      There is a reason most cameras have IR filters.
      A camera that is designed to see in the IR can almost
      see through clothing. Same with some flash situations
      as a celeb or two has discovered.

      Given the nature of TLA alterations to hardware, camera modifications
      to gaming consoles, laptops and more are to be expected where
      technology makes it possible.

      Light switches, smoke and CO detectors, wireless devices including routers
      can all be hacked. Little protects my WiFi router update code from being
      spoofed when it reaches out for an update.

      Same for my TV cable provider boxes. OK not the same... bandwidth is off
      the hook for those guys as is storage, power and processor power in the box.

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    4. Re:Well arguably it can't see in the dark by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Footage would be nearly useless as the remotes are generally pointed at the TV or flailing about.

      There are techniques for producing high-quality still imagery from video and position data. Better yet, there are techniques for producing 3d imagery from the same.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Well arguably it can't see in the dark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't see in the dark if you keep it locked in a steel box when not in use. Of course, what a pain in the ass that would be.

  7. XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A worthless gaming peripheral!

    1. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      This is the truth. All Kinect games involve an insane amount of luck because of the device's lack of accuracy. The only thing this device is good for is surveillance, so I assume that's what it's really for. Gamers need precise control, and the Kinect doesn't have it.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    2. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      The joy of the Kinect-2 is the voice control and player recognition - and the ability to use it to multi-task in snaps.

      I can walk into the room and casually say "XBox On," followed by "Watch TV" and "Watch ESPN." ...all before I'm done changing out of my work clothes. The voice control on it is pretty damned impressive, as is its ability to tell members of my family apart, and log them in and out of the system automatically.

    3. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      Yes, like I said, useless for gaming.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    4. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Does it actually play games? Since it isn't backwards compatible, I assume there's not many.

      Does it play Blu Ray discs? Because the last one they'd bet on HD-DVD which went nowhere.

      Does it let me play games without trying to monetize every aspect of that and share that information with Microsoft? I seriously doubt that.

      To me it sounds like an attempt to be the entertainment hub of your room, sell you ads and premium services, violate your privacy, and has conveniently forgotten what some people want is a video game console.

      To me it sounds like they're making something else and calling it a video game. And if it needs an internet connection, I have no interest in it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by s.petry · · Score: 1

      There is a whole lot of psychology to contemplate with this behavior, and not very much of it is positive unless the people using it are handicapped in some way

      Since the majority of the people doing this have nothing impairing them (obesity from laziness does not count) I find it sad. I would think differently if starting up the device required more than pressing a button after picking up a remote or moving to a box.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    6. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      So, voice commands are lazy, and remotes are the sensible thing?

      Early adopters of remotes probably got told that by people who stood up to change the channel.

    7. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's the dependence on an electronic box where you would worry or brag about it being voice capable. If I had an option of changing channels on the TV like in the old days I would not worry about a remote either. Cable and DSL require a remote, what you are doing goes well beyond a requirement.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    8. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Voice controls are still quite good. The ability to, say, yell "Grenade!" at your TV gives you another thumb - so to speak.

      So, it's not just snapping other programs and windows in and out while you play your game -- which is useful for gaming - but there's direct uses in actual games for the voice commands that make your life easier.

    9. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Is your copy of Wikipedia broken?

      Does it actually play games? Since it isn't backwards compatible, I assume there's not many.

      There aren't a lot of launch titles on the XBox One (or the PS4 for that matter), but I'm not sure what that has fuckall to do with the Kinect 2.

      Does it play Blu Ray discs? Because the last one they'd bet on HD-DVD which went nowhere.

      Yes.

      Does it let me play games without trying to monetize every aspect of that and share that information with Microsoft? I seriously doubt that.

      You can play completely offline, in a Faraday cage with a TV and an XBox One if that's your thing.

      To me it sounds like an attempt to be the entertainment hub of your room, sell you ads and premium services, violate your privacy, and has conveniently forgotten what some people want is a video game console.

      To me it sounds like they're making something else and calling it a video game.

      Is is a good attempt to be that device. If that's not the device you need, no worries, there are other options for you. They've done a good job of advertising it as exactly that -- the "One" device for your living room. Get your Skype calls on it, watch you TV on it, play your games on it, have your fantasy football scores overlaid on the NFL channel.. All in "One" place. If you think they were just advertising it as a game console, you missed their ads.

      And if it needs an internet connection, I have no interest in it.

      Asked and answered, your honor.

    10. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Cable and DSL require a remote.

      Bullshit.

      There's plenty of cable boxes with an up-down channel button on them. You know, for example nearly every Scientific Atlanta, Cisco, Pace, Samsung and Motorola used by pretty much everyone.

      http://ww2.cox.com/residential...
      http://customer.comcast.com/he...
      http://www.timewarnercable.com...

      If I had an option of changing channels on the TV like in the old days I would not worry about a remote either.

      It's your lucky day!

    11. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by s.petry · · Score: 1

      One gets what the cable company provides, and not all of them have the option. You go ahead and try to rig up your own box with Comcast and be amazed at how fast they cut your service off.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    12. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's such a shortage of cable boxes with channel buttons on them -- except from every major provider... ...and all the minor ones.

    13. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Attempting to defend yourself by attacking others, such class.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    14. Re:XBox Kinect: An NSA wet dream and . . . by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      Voice commands certainly don't require a device like a Kinect. Also, even under the best of circumstances, the day's not coming where you can twitch to trigger a voice command with any degree of precision that would be acceptable in an action game. I'm thinking about the way we used to toss grenades at each other's feet in Quakeworld, and trying to imagine yelling "Grenade!" for each one. Seems like a good way to lose.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
  8. Only if it is connected to a network by dtribble · · Score: 1

    Our kid's XBox is not connected to any network. It really is as simple as that.

    1. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by koan · · Score: 1

      That you know of.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      We also didn't allow cameras in our daughter's room or other private rooms in the house.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    3. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume that non networked devices don't surveil you? Logging is all that's required, especially if said log can be stored in a place inaccessible to users.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    4. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume that non networked devices don't surveil you?

      But if it's powered off and or air-gapped, who is going to collect it and how?

      When my XBox 360 isn't in use, the Kinect is powered down. When it isn't connected to the internet (which it never is, and never will be), there's no mechanism for someone to get anything from it.

      The XBone insists it is always connected to the internet (last I heard) and I'm not sure I trust that when the deice is off it isn't still recording -- many people pretty much have been saying this would happen for years, that our entertainment devices would become privacy nightmares.

      When Microsoft et al decided it was their console and that it would do whatever they wanted ... many of us decided we'd not be willing to buy it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by Marrow · · Score: 1

      What makes you think the wireless adapter is really turned off?

    6. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Most wireless routers list all connected clients, so there's that. I'm sure somebody in the world would have noted it by now if that was the case.

      I'd counter myself with "how do you know there isn't a hidden cellular receiver in there?" but by the same logic as above -- there's plenty of hardware hackers in the world and I'm sure someone would have noticed it by now were that the case. (And even if it was hidden in an otherwise-innocuous looking black blob that the hardware hackers might overlook, there are also people with cell scanners in the world.)

    7. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by Marrow · · Score: 1

      The device could be listening for a invitation to create an ad-hoc network. That invitation could even come from a hacked access point or device. Could be that they already own your router or appleTV or roku or printer in order to be able to reach out and get your xbox too.

    8. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      If I were the spy, I would have it log symbolically who was present in the room at what times, 24/7, using facial recognition and store them in an encrypted innocuous looking file outside of user-accessible storage. Then, if the machine is airgapped and disconnected, I simply collect the unit physically from any home where it looks like a resident may be an activist or have a chance at winning political office, or other power-enabling life developments. Then I use the data stored about who was in the room when to blackmail the activist into stopping any political actions.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    9. Re:Only if it is connected to a network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't. But it would have to have my broadband password to connect, which it does not have.

  9. don't own a console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you don't want your game console to spy on you, don't own one. There are plenty of other gaming options.

    What's that you say? Cool kids need to own consoles to be cool kids? Guess what, kids? Big Brother is cool! Big Brother loves you! Big Brother wants to fuck you up the ass, and the best part is, you want to enjoy it! Idiots.

  10. Sounds like telephones in the old Soviet Union by dtjohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The landline telephones in the old USSR didn't hang up when the user put the handset back in the cradle and so people routinely put a pillow over them.

  11. Power bar by phorm · · Score: 1

    I have a computer which doesn't really shut down fully, but rather has one of those motherboards that will keep powered up enough to charge USB devices etc.
    It's annoying as the PSU also has a bit of a whine from either the capacitors or transformers.

    My solution is an old single-outlet power-bar which has an on/off button. It plugs into the regular power-bar, and then the computer plugs into it. When I'm not using the computer, I just turn off the juice at the bar.

    For those worried about other electronic devices with cameras etc, I'd imagine a similar method would work. If in doubt, pull the plug.

    1. Re:Power bar by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Assuming they haven't hidden a backup battery in there somewhere!

  12. Parallel Construction by PraiseBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the entire point of parallel construction. They can't or won't reveal how they are monitoring you secretly. Instead they can claim that you were acting suspicious based on something else you've done which has nominally taken place in some kind of public space. Then they get a warrant based on that, and "find" the threats you are making, and charge you with that too.

    1. Re:Parallel Construction by erroneus · · Score: 2

      All these fancy words for LIES. This is conspiracy against the American people and the people who push the documents instructing law enforcement to do that need to be tried for treason.

      Yeah I am aware of the parallel construction bit. That's why we need to trap some LEOs with it.

    2. Re:Parallel Construction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never going to happen, dumbass.

    3. Re:Parallel Construction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know the penalty for treason in a time of war. It's the only way to focus their attention.

  13. Wii Remote returns position, not actual picture by tepples · · Score: 1

    Footage would be nearly useless as the remotes are generally pointed at the TV or flailing about.

    That and the Wii Remote firmware summarizes the picture from its 128x96 pixel IR camera into the positions and sizes of the four largest bright spots anyway.

  14. same for laptops and cell phones by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    Anything they can do with an xbox they can do with a cell phone / laptop as well. I just bought one of these:
    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00H9...

    discrete static cling covers for your glass-front equipment. you can still peel off when you want to facetime or whatever, then put them back.

    I don't know how to muffle the microphones when I'm not using them, does anybody have ideas?

    1. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by erroneus · · Score: 1

      How about just unplugging the sh!t?

    2. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      What, opening the phone, voiding the warranty and unplugging the camera(s) from the board (or possibly cutting the traces)? Or do you mean pulling the phone's battery?

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      the thing is sometimes I want to facetime with my family. its the other times that I don't want to be watched.

    4. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by Holi · · Score: 1

      turn your phone off. I mean if your that paranoid.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      would I be cray-cray if I put a sticker over the cameraphone? is that something that nutso people do? should I be alarmed that I think this is a reasonable thing to do? I ask for your real opinion. Ever since there was a tv there were people who were convinced that it was watching them and listening to them. I'm sure each one of them thought it was a reasonable belief.

    6. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      would I be cray-cray if I put a sticker over the cameraphone? is that something that nutso people do? should I be alarmed that I think this is a reasonable thing to do?

      In short, yes. While it is certainly within the realms of possibility that it could be used to spy on you, it's so tremendously unlikely to happen that it's not worth worrying about. At present, anyway. And really, what does someone actually get out of looking through your phone's camera? 99% of the time, it'd just be a very dark extreme closeup of the inside of your pocket, and the rest of the time split between an extreme closeup of your ear while you talk and your face as you giggle at the latest cat video.

    7. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd make a great agent!

    8. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll call ya: Agent McGoo!

    9. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by s.petry · · Score: 2

      Nope, temperature and motion sensors could be used to tell people want to watch the camera. The microphone is a different issue but sensors and GPS would still let them know when to start looking at you. Sensors have been in phones for a long time, as has been the ability for your phone to broadcast sensor information even when you believe the phone is turned "off".

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    10. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Only if you think it would give you more battery life. A little faraday bag would be better. DIY with duct tape and foil.

    11. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      obv a faraday pouch wouldn't work because they could still take pictures when it is being used i.e. for text messaging. also then it wouldn't be able to receive calls. also when the phone can't connect to a signal it goes on this crazy search which burns batteries, so a faraday pouch wouldn't work. so it goes back to is it something that cray cray people do?

    12. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by pkinetics · · Score: 1

      In Post Freedom Amerika, cell phone butt dials you?

    13. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends what you're trying to do which upon further contemplation would be to retain the use of the camera and mic when you want to but disable them at all other times. I would say that if you're that concerned to cover the camera then the microphone should be deemed a greater threat. Audio might not give as much info but it would always be available. And once you're at that train of thought, then what about integrated GPS? Sure, any cellphone could be triangulated via cell towers but GPS would be quicker and more precise.

      Obviously you want to still be able to use it, receive calls, etc. so no faraday bag or removal of battery (if that's even an option). Maybe you could open it up, give the camera and mic individually wired switches, and disguise it all by making a neat replacement case (steampunk, hardwood, Star Trek PADD, etc.).

    14. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      You're right, I'm hosed on gps and cell tower pings no matter what. Apple has the find my friends and find my. iPhone apps that track me presumably only with my pwd, but obv the NSA's house words are "no more secrets" so it doesn't matter.

      Probably the best thing that I can do is get a case designed to cover the camera and muffle the mic to the extent possible until I decide to use it. Probably would also avoid the tinfoil hat stares I will get with the sticker over the camera. Also, the case would block the back camera too, which wouldn't be as easy with the sticker on the front glass.

      Still, the computer? The MacBook camera is super easy with the static cling sticker since it's under the glass. But I'm effed on the microphone I think. Jebus, it's hard to live in today's world.

      I also like the sticker because it's more of a symbolic eff you than anything else. Sure, the NSA has mega-billion dollar budgets and a PETA-yotta-zeta byte data center, back doors in every single piece of hardware and OS, and no oversight so they can all live out their Bond fantasies, but I've got a sticker so kiss my ass.

    15. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      sorry for multiple replies, maybe it will be helpful to build this info in one place. Here's how to kibosh the mike on your macbook.

      to kill in hardware: For unibody macbook pros the microphone is connected to the logic board but not soldered on, so if you have iron nuts you can actually just unplug it. you give up the convenience of FaceTime chats or dictation without plugging in an external mike, but if you care then you care:
      http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Ma...

      then if you get one of these it's convenient to get microphone access when you need it. This one works for the macbook airs that have the line-in/ line-out port like an iPhone, it might work for an older macbook with a separate line in port, i don't know.
      http://www.amazon.com/IK-Multi...

      if this is too permanent or hard core, then there are a few ways of doing it in software. Here is a guide from the NSA themselves on how to harden your macbook. this version applies to snow leopard, but much of it likely still holds over.
      http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/f...

      a last thought, another way you could be super hardcore is to pull out the airport card, which like the microphone isn't soldered on. it has wifi and bluetooth. another super pain in the ass thing, but it's a step.

      this appears to be a small USB dongle that would give you BT and wi-fi when you need it.
      http://www.amazon.com/Cirago-B...

      OK, once you've done all these things you can upgrade to ranger-level tinfoil hat.

    16. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      Fine, then they know exactly when to look at an extreme closeup of your ear or your face as you giggle at the latest cat video.

      More seriously, if they have the capability of doing that, then they'd also be able to monitor actual voice conversations and text messages, which are much greater concerns than them being able to get a look at you.

    17. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Apologies for the delayed response on this one. They already do know when to monitor voice and chat, and they already capture that information. The sensors in phones are very advanced, and can be used for either good or bad deeds. I know this from working at a very large telecom company where they used sensor data in a good way, mostly. Some of the programs they were working on before I left, I found objectionable. FWIW, I don't work there any longer and let them know how I felt about those programs.

      The point was, and is, that they don't have to waste cycles like people try and claim. That is absolutely false, and people ignorant to the technology easily fall for that fairy tale.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    18. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      Less delayed than my previous response was, so no worries.

      Interesting insight, of course, but all kind of besides the point. The point is that, if the actual conversations can be monitored (whether or not the phone is smart), then worrying about them looking through the camera is worrying about the wrong thing.

    19. Re:same for laptops and cell phones by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I believe this is faulty logic. If you have a camera and microphone both can be used for spying on you. Taking away the microphone does not take away the camera and visa versa. It's not one or the other, it's both and should be treated as both. Sensors can help them pinpoint which is the best to use at any given time (give or take communications time to/from the towers)

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  15. Fuel by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you think that is bad enough that the government is doing it, think that in fact the ones doing it is the people of the government, the same ones that spied the conversation between US soldiers and their fiancees/wives when they were at Afganistan, and shared between themselves the hottest parts.

    Probably the biggest repository of child porn of the world is in NSA servers for their "investigative" use. And we are speaking about people that have power over you and your family.

    1. Re:Fuel by s.petry · · Score: 2

      This is exactly why you don't want Governments doing _anything_ illegal. The intention for the DEA to buy cocaine might be to bust a dealer, but the risk for agents to abuse or resell the cocaine for personal gain now exists. Allowing parallel construction so that a special case can be busted means that it will also be used for vindictive purposes. What we have lost is accountability within our Government, and the requirement for the Government to enforce their own Constitution against themselves.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  16. Eat it by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

    It can't do shit if it is unplugged

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  17. Laugh by koan · · Score: 1

    'If the government wants this information they're going to get it, no matter what we do with our gaming consoles.

    Stop using them.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Laugh by Zuato · · Score: 1

      What about our cell phones that have cameras on both sides with microphones and GPS? We're freaking out over a Kinect sensor when the NSA is more likely to go after your smart phone than a Kinect sensor because it can gather more data from that device than a video game console could ever provide.

    2. Re: Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get an old style prepay, the only distressing thing is you're a slave to tech.

  18. Easy solutions by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    1 - Don't support products that spy
    2 - unplug when not in use.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Easy solutions by Zuato · · Score: 1

      1) Smartphones - are we going to ditch those since they can provide more information to the NSA/Government than an Xbox Kinect can?
      2) I'd gladly unplug (turn off - still no guarantee since my Nexus 5 has a sealed battery) my smartphone, but since I'm expected to carry it for work (stipend) I can't exactly turn it off.

    2. Re:Easy solutions by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      My smartphone doesn't come from this country. I really doubt that the NSA has hooks into it.

      Tape over the camera works for your 'work phone'.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Easy solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would be surprised.

  19. Ben Kuchera and Polygon by sexconker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ben Kuchera is a fucking tool who has no business writing about anything. The same goes for Polygon.
    Kuchera was one of the assmunches on the front lines defending MS's initial DRM and always-online schemes for the XBOX One.

    His opinions were so bad and so obviously paid-for that he got kicked out of Penny Arcade for shit like this http://penny-arcade.com/report... (I think they pulled it down because it was so bad) and this https://twitter.com/BenKuchera... .
    Penny fucking Arcade realized how shitty he was, Yes, that Penny Arcade. The one run by the no-standards shills that did an instant 180 from gamers to tools once MS started paying them. The PA that bullies its own fans and offers a kickstarter to remove ads from their massively-profitable website, with stretch goals to remove more ads, but still not all the ads.

    Ben Kuchera's internet fame was spawned from PA, and he became such an insufferable goon that even PA realized he needed to be cut loose. He shat around Arse Technica for a while and now he's shitting it up at Polygon.

    We all know games "journalism" is about one of the most laughable things ever, but Kuchera and Polygon represent the fucking highest echelon of shilling, shit-flinging, and all around douchebaggery. There is zero integrity involved with Polygon as a whole and with Kuchera as a person. You shouldn't simply distrust their reviews, news, opinions, etc., you should actively trust it to be complete and utter paid-for horseshit.

    1. Re:Ben Kuchera and Polygon by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 2

      Kuchera sucks. Got it. Polygon sucks. Check. What about the actual article topic?

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    2. Re:Ben Kuchera and Polygon by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      So there is no privacy concern here? Cause I was worried there for a bit.

    3. Re:Ben Kuchera and Polygon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dub thee, +5 Interinformative!

    4. Re:Ben Kuchera and Polygon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, *that* Ben Kuchera. I thought the name sounded familiar.

      I remember that he used to post a story on women in gaming every couple weeks with a radically feminist slant on PAR, get enraged when a bunch of commenters didn't agree with him, and then locking the comments on the story. Most unprofessional thing I've ever seen. You'd have thought he'd have leaned his lesson after the first one but he did it at least three times.

      What a tool.

    5. Re:Ben Kuchera and Polygon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the world of discrediting the messenger. Did you actually have a point to make about privacy or where you just here to attack someone?

      You're playing the NSA's game.

    6. Re:Ben Kuchera and Polygon by Mockylock · · Score: 1

      This article and all of the junk attached to it is a joke. I'm sure more than half of these posts were made on some camera-enabled device... but, because it's an xbox, it's more likely to be used for evil.

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
  20. I don't have a gaming console you insensitive clod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, after reading this, I'm happy with that.

  21. Simple by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    Don't buy a console.

    --
    -
  22. Until people complain in droves, it'll get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's going to get a lot worse, because most people do not care. Bread and circuses.

  23. Video game consoles for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brainwash them early to be comfortable with 24/7 surveillance.

  24. First they came for...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If the government wants this information they're going to get it" is only true if we let them. In a democracy this should be a achievable by the ballot box. Even if it seems we don't have anyone to vote for that's no excuse to surrender to the 'get over it' mantra; doing nothing is never neutral; it will always count against you.

  25. +10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +10

  26. Planet is filled with tech illiterate... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    ... morons.

    Nowhere can this clearly be seen more than in the videogame industry, with the rise of STEAM DRM and the gullible people who lap it all up while gaming history (games you can own, modify, and not be spied on, watched, datamined) is going down in flames. Console players are among the most stupid on the planet, so videogame consoles would be an easy in for any government wanting to spy on its citizens.

    The planet is just filled with stupid illiterate fucks who breed and pay for this shit because they don't have the brain cells to rub together to understand the implications sadly. They'll fork over any amount of money to feed their game addiction sadly all while being gouged, fleeced, DRM'd and DLC'd up and down six ways to sunday.

    1. Re:Planet is filled with tech illiterate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're just one lone dumbfuck. The rest of us are fine playing our Steam DRM'd wares. And the ones we pirated before deciding whether they were worthwhile or not.

      Stop being a douchebag.

  27. Secure your things . . . . by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    This possibility is why I don't OWN an X-Box One and why my existing gaming console ( which lacks a video camera and microphone ) is isolated to its own VLAN on my home network. For that matter, all the phones are on their own VLAN, the gaming console on another, the alarm system a third. I don't allow them to talk to anything other than the internet or ( in the case of the phones ) each other.

    Don't really want the X-Box camera watching me when I walk through the house, the mic picking up my conversations, or any of the other devices being used as a jump off point of entry to the rest of my network.

  28. Your phone has been spying on you for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your phone has been spying on you for years and you never complained. And you take it with you everywhere. Your camera and mic can be turned on remotely, so a third party could eavesdrop on your surroundings through your pocket, can turn on the camera while you're talking to see what's around you. Everywhere you go, not just your living room (where you also likely take your phone). Amazes me all the Chicken Littles with their little chicken heads cut off.

    1. Re:Your phone has been spying on you for years by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Who never complained?

  29. How the Xbox One works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Originally the Xbox One required a CALIBRATED Kinect 2 sensor bar to be active at all times, and instructed ALL game developers, especially those with no need for ANY Kinect functionality in the main gameplay, to constantly check the functioning status of the Kinect 2, and to demand that users 'recalibrated' the Kinect, if it identified blockage of the sensors (like tape, or pointing Kinect at a wall).

    Originally the Xbox One required a permanent connection to the Internet. The reason for these two requirements (only rescinded when market research proved that Xbox One sales would be disastrous unless these policies were altered) is no mystery.

    Every Xbox One is constantly monitoring the people in the room, even when the console is "off" but still connected to the mains. Put a 'kill-o-watt' meter on both the Xbox One and PS4, and measure power use in 'standby'. You will discover the Xbox One is still pulling masses of power, enough to keep the 25% of Xbox One hardware dedicated to Kinect fully functional. Examine the Internet traffic from the console, and watch how the console is ALWAYS uploading and downloading at regular periods, even when the console is not in use. Of course, we are all used to MS Windows doing exactly the same thing on the desktop, with MS issuing various lame excuses for the traffic.

    By unchangeable default, every Xbox One, even in standby or in the dark, is tracking every person who enter (or leaves) the room, taking high-definition photos of their faces, and uploading these images with datestamps to NSA servers that are in the so-called Microsoft 'cloud'. The NSA runs face recognition algorithms against the mugshots, and even if an actual name is not matched, still give the particular face a unique code - just like a fingerprint is still useful and unique even when you lack the name of the owner. The face recognition software is mostly the work of Google.

    By unchangeable default, every online Xbox One registers that fact with NSA master-servers. Microsoft has provided the NSA with a complete list of encryption keys that are unique to each console. The key allows an NSA agent to order any onlne Xbox One to begin capturing, encoding, encrypting and uploading a video stream of user-controllable quality and bandwidth. Should the agent fear the sudden upload bandwidth may raise suspicion, Microsoft sets aside a large part of the internal HDD for local storage of such streams, so they may be uploaded at a less 'difficult' time, like when the target is asleep.

    The Kinect cameras can see in the dark. The Kinect cameras can frequently detect heart and breathing rates of individuals in the room. The Kinect micophone array can usually hear conversations in adjoining rooms. The INCREDIBLY EXPENSIVE 'time-of-flight' military grade sensor that Bill Gates personally instructed Microsoft to spend billions of dollars to develop, while lousy for low-latency accurate video game input, is brilliant for identifying forms of human movement. Kinect 2 motion recognition has ZERO relationship with the god-awful bad joke technology Microsoft bought from a hopeless Israeli company for the original Kinect.

    Via its Human motion processing, the Xbox One, for instance, can recognise the various forms of all Human sexual activity. This fact has massive significance. Snowden already leaked documents showing how mindless capture of video data by the NSA and GCHQ flooded the government goons with so much data, they didn't know where to look first. They WANT to, and do collect all available electronic traffic, but they crave automatic ways of knowing when it is 'interesting'.

    Here's where the innovation of the Xbox One really kicks in. Bill Gates originally pitched to the NSA the ultimate in 'smart' domestic spying. A camera and microphone system that would be so smart, it would know WHEN to start recording, and when to alert the NSA. The Xbox One is designed to accept remote lists of 'trigger' conditions. The NSA can send to any given console or range of consoles a 'script' that controls

  30. when in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unplug

    It's that easy, unplug.

  31. If the NSA wants to watch me run nekkid... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ...through the house going "WOO WOOOO WOOOOO!" every time I get out of the shower, I would not begrudge them the spectacle.

  32. No, it isn't by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    If the government wants this information they're going to get it, no matter what we do with our gaming consoles

    I refuse to own a gaming console which is required to be connected to the internet.

    I disconnected my XBox 360 when it started showing me ads, and since I don't play games online or use it to stream videos, I have no use for a game console which requires the internet -- especially if we have to treat the privacy implications as inevitable.

    I'll give up gaming before I put an always connected camera in my living room.

    Make me a gaming console which doesn't need to be connected to the internet, or don't expect me to buy one that does.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:No, it isn't by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      SNES, PS1, Gamecube etc. Or roll your own with Linux. Nobody is forcing anyone to buy these devices. Free Will, it's a bitch.

  33. Duct Tape by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

    Duct Tape works on all kinda materials.Can be painted too .

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  34. Modern devices miss a real "power off" by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    Another reason I'm missing a proper "power off" switch on many devices, besides the residual power use (wastes power, so wastes my money). One that physically, not electronically, breaks the power supply to the device. More and more of our devices do not have an "off" switch any more, it's really a "stand-by" switch. Of course that's convenient, as it's always listening for you to press the remote control "on" button for it to spring to life, it also means many other functions can be kept working secretly.

    While there is no evidence that this happens on a big scale nowadays, as other comments mentioned (the telescreens from "1984", phones in the Soviet Union), it can be done either in fantasy or reality. Mobile phones are never off, they alway have to stay on to receive calls. And they carry cameras and a microphone. The laptop that I'm using now has a camera pointing at me, and it has a microphone. No way to physically switch them off, short of opening the device and cutting the wires.

  35. You don't get it yet by mattr · · Score: 2

    Matrix multiplication means picking up where multiple factors can be combined to produce a high score. It can analyze threat = capability x intent. I think this approach can be used as much by the individual trying to get a handle on reality (multiply news by what you know is possible) as by a massive organization (crunch data streams to find exploitable juicy bits).
    If you think this way you will be paranoid. But, if you just want to imagine where things can go if they get even worse than they are now, say if unlimited resources are deployed by utterly immoral actors, it can be useful.
    For example, without formal training I came up with the above threat equation. After typing the equation into Google, it turns out that it is correct and part of formal risk/threat assessment calculations. I figure that's because it is common sense.
    http://www.aci-na.org/sites/de...

    Capability matrix:
    Look. The entire data stream starting from the time a Kinect is plugged into electrical power can be automatically saved forever in a quiet data center.
    XBox+Kinect is a very powerful listening device because of its smarts. It can download a program or search parameters and seek high-quality data, such as a conversation with a certain person's name in it, and filter it before sending it upstream. It can also compress a raw feed and gradually upload it over time.
    So if anyone ever does something criminal or suggestive, like maybe your child has a party and someone does drugs in the living room, that data can be silently tagged and stored without any human's knowledge.
    Any of your computers, or any computer ever in your vicinity throughout your daily life, or the lives of other people, can do the same thing. Just silently record at all times. There are too many ways it can be done in software. Free apps, buggy malware, browsers..
    All phones, networked hardware, your car's On-Star navigation system and black box, can be additional channels.

    Intent matrix:
    Years later, if someone wants to find something on you they just make a mining query.
    Queries can ultimately matrix multiply all locations x all channels x all individuals x all conversations files or positioning data.
    Such as any conversation that mentions a target name or keyword ever held in front of anybody's XBox, personal laptop, tablet, wall phone, mobile phone, desk at work in any company. If you ignore any difficulty associated with processing/telecom/power/time capacity you will understand that rather than simply being "overheard" it is like you are leading your life by crawling over a jungle-gym moving from one data capture point to another. Your life over time and space, and those of all people with whom you interact, together become an immense transparent crystal object that can be observed at one's convenience from any angle.

    Matrix Product: (exploitable output, or the threat)
    Forget trying to end-run around the NSA, there is no point. But worry about other actors.
    The U.S. data will be privately owned and controlled by other actors.
    Any big company or country has a chance at subverting these streams and building their own global capacity.
    A criminal organization could pressure a Verizon sysadmin.
    The captured data does not have to go to court. It can be shown to someone else, or to you in order to embarrass you into tilting you towards a given course of action, for example if a target was shown video capturing an infidelity. The actor can dial in any degree of formality, truth or fairness.
    Data that might have saved you (such as data proving innocence or entrapment) can be deleted, ignored, or modified in whatever private data center it is stored.
    Parallel construction means all of this dark activity, a dark war against humanity, can be kept in the dark, but leveraged when some other expedient is selected.

    Comments:
    Once you or someone many steps removed who you don't even know has been targeted or an annotation has been made

  36. Outside of the rant by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't mean rant in a negative light exactly, but that you are behaving similar to what you are complaining about. The Article is about how game consoles can monitor people, which does not have positive consequences for society and citizens. This writer and source is not the first to cover the topic, just the most recent. Spending 4 paragraphs telling everyone how bad the author and source without mention of the topic distracts from the article and topic.

    Welcome to the game, if you were not playing intentionally you just became a sucker. If you were playing intentionally, well, go find a sand box and pound some.

    People have been concerned about Xbox One and it's always on sensor arrays designed for spying. There was a recent report in the Guardian telling us that GCHQ used it to spy on people in Xbox360. There is no reason to believe that the latest will be used any differently, and no reason to believe that what GCHQ does also happens at the NSA, CIA, FBI, DHS, etc...

    My family is smart enough to have boycotted all versions of the MS consoles. Yeah, we have owned PS2 through PS4 and some people have concerns with those. Most Sony PS concerns relate to the old Sony root kit issues however, and not some always on spytech filming and recording your every move.

    If people want a fix to the solution, start boycotting. Remember that a boycott is not just not purchasing something, but actively persuading others to not purchase that same thing. It will take a lot to force change, because there are all these nice back door payments to companies so that they do the wrong thing (yet another Snowden/Guardian piece you should read).

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Outside of the rant by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      per current us law, I'm not sure a warrant would be necessary if MS decided to open up the Kinect to a government agency. You have already entrusted the data to a third party.

      This issue really needs to be addressed, especially with cell phones.

  37. SOP = BS by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I love this, from TFA:

    and that fear has been at least partially justified.'

    that's equivocation....very harmful equivocation

    Kinect's design is *evil* and to require critics to meet such a large burden of proof is inconsistent, illogical, and harmful to our industry

    let me be clear...the 'fear' of Capitalist Big Brother is not "partially justified" it is absolutely a full realized FACT

    to analyze the issue, claim expertise, then to equivocate in such a manner is **wrong**

    it hurts our industry in untold ways, giving non-tech's a skewed idea of how tech works

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  38. The Xbox is just the forerunner, next; the HDTV's by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And that's just too bad as I'd love to bash MS and their Xbox. -PS4 future owner.

    I just purchased a SAMSUNG UN32F6300AFXZA is it 120Hz or not being a running question? I use it as a 32" monitor, and it has one hell of a display http://www.newegg.com/Product/...

    This HDTV is decked out, WiFi and hardwired, lots of things to keep one occupied, even has it's own web browser, Voice commands, Turn on , Turn off (I guess), and, "Gestures" it reads your body language or maybe just your hand, and face recognition. What you might not see, is my reluctance to set it up to just a SamSung account.

    As usual I read the ToS's and the privacy policy of the system when I set it up;( It's required reading or else you just click on ok and continue) It mentions the privacy policy in passing (a link) in the ToS's, When you enter the "Smart Hub" area your shown another privacy policy (previous link) that shows this HDTV is one hell of a data miner, what's collected is placed in a data base, kept and based as per South Korea laws (jurisdiction).

    Why would it do this? It's for the "S Recommendation", "Find something good to watch. Simply click the recommend button on the remote to get instant recommended shows that are on now". (from link above)

    Cause it should know who you are and what you like; if you've had this HDTV 6 months or more it should know you and your sister apart, or a request to "show me something dirty" could go horribly wrong.

    A person with this set up in their place would most likely have it linked to the Lan, A Web cam setup to read gestures and face recognition, a microphone turned on for the voice commands. All the requirements of an Xbox plus more (the constant Internet connection) while not required to be connected all the time, most likely once it's set-up it will stay in that configuration.

    I've looked and can't find a ToS or Privacy policy easily. I just know what I read and have sansung.com blocked at the router level for two reasons. I use it as a monitor and don't need it as an 240Hz LCD HDTV, my Panasonic 600Hz Plasma HDTV takes care of that feature poking fun at refresh rates and the big lie) - The second reason is Samsung tries to access and work with your FaceBook account and if you don't have one, highly suggest you get one. Facebook being a third party would have access to all of SamSung's data on you (no basis for that, would seem a given so to me).

    I really would like to read the ToS again I positive it's against Samsung's ToS to watch pornography on this HDTV. :}

    To opt out:
    opt-out-shine-the-light-law@sisa.samsung.com
    (Samsung may need to ask you to provide follow-up information in the order to duly process an E-mail request).

  39. Who said steganography only works one way? by vlueboy · · Score: 2

    I guarantee you that the Kinect does not transfer that kind of information to Microsoft since it will be caught and there will be outrage.

    Obviously, if they were planning on using the device to spy on people, it'd be for extremely targeted operations, activating monitoring mode only for certain people, and therefore not likely to be discovered.

    Why not send the previously collected bursts while you're playing games? Remember the big stink about the last generation of games needing to be online originally? well, we're already all doing online games and services (netflix, Facebook, twitter) on the TV anyway. The XBOX data can go wherever it is the online data servers are, and distributed man-in-the-middle-style from there to MS, and thus, the NSA. Just sneak a bit at a time into the game / video / DLC bursts and encryption will hide the rest.

  40. Its not about crime... by Justpin · · Score: 1

    Until the capacity expands so that they can be watching you all the time. The problem is that while they may not catch crimes, they can certainly use it to shut you up if you have a valid complaint. The UK government and police have a strategy to defame and destroy your reputation if you have any sort of complaint. The UK government has a track record of this, whenever somebody is arrested and subsequently released, y'know because they were innocent they get defamed. Hostile 'leaks' are released to defame this person and blacken their reputation. For instance two men who were subject to a police raid, one of them was even shot, they took their house apart and found no evidence of wrong doing. Instead of an apology they were then arrested on child porn possession charges. This made the front pages of the dead tree press. The charges were then dropped for 'insufficient evidence'. Again with the Brazilian electrician shot in London, press releases made out he was a rapist, again no evidence. Pam Warren survivor of a train crash was subject to a mud slinging campaign. So if threatened to have the stuff which goes on in your private bedroom exposed to the public would you back off? especially as they would undoubtedly edit it to show your worst side. Normal sex for instance..... edit it to put the words stop you're hurting me.... oops you're now a rapist.

    1. Re:Its not about crime... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being acquitted of child pornography charges should never affect one's reputation, unless the population are really that brain dead. (wouldn't surprise me, they're celebrity retarded anyway)

  41. Re:The Xbox is just the forerunner, next; the HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats a fun Document, my fav part is:

    Do Not Track Signals and Similar Mechanisms

    Some web browsers may transmit "do-not-track" signals to the websites with which the user communicates, although web browsers incorporate and activate this functionality in different ways, and it is not always clear whether users intend for these signals to be transmitted. There currently is disagreement, including among participants in the leading Internet standards-setting organization, concerning what, if anything, websites should do when they receive such signals. Samsung currently does not take action in response to these signals, but, if and when a standard is established and accepted, we may reassess how to respond to these signals.

    If you send a DO NOT TRACK, they ignore it, because its a mistake you didn't mean for them not to track you even after you have to select the do not track manually its off by default.

  42. Re:The Xbox is just the forerunner, next; the HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad you're blocking Samsung's corporate website at your router. There's no possible way that they could ever have servers under unrelated IP addresses or hostnames -- we all know that would be breaking Internet Laws.

  43. Bend over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Note that your ACME gesture controlled toilet must be connected to internet at all times, and the camera must not be covered up.

  44. voluntary surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best part about all this is how the public voluntarily funds their own surveillance. We happily buy smart phones that can track our movements and purchasing habits. Xbox is just another way we pay to be spied on.

  45. Re:The Xbox is just the forerunner, next; the HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, we have the device stripped down the firmware dumped, we have all outside TCP/IP references blocked at the firewall.

  46. Oh no! by romons · · Score: 1

    They can locate me IN MY OWN HOME! They know when I'm GOING TO THE BATHROOM! They can listen to me EAT PIZZA!

    1984 all over again. Er, well, you know what I mean. The horror!

    --
    Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
  47. Re:The Xbox is just the forerunner, next; the HDTV by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    I'm glad you're blocking Samsung's corporate website at your router. There's no possible way that they could ever have servers under unrelated IP addresses or hostnames -- we all know that would be breaking Internet Laws.

    I'd used to be able to say not a problem, but https://www.robtex.com/ isn't showing what it used to, if fact nothing more than if a site is safe or not.

    Not saying Samsung is blocked as one can't, but I do what I can, and https://www.robtex.com/ used to tell me all of the ip addresses of a company.
    and that all paths lead to Google :}

    It's more than blocking them at the router level, I don't use the WiFI and haven't or plan on getting a Sumsung account so no place to pigion hole any thing they may get.

    Bottom line is it's very intrusive, required to providing you with a fairly decent service. And a question I've been asked on /. a few times, am I willing to give up my freedoms just to watch TV. - Which I don't use the Samsung for it's, my PC monitor