Slashdot Mirror


NASA Puts Its New Spacesuit Design To a Public Vote

An anonymous reader writes "NASA, in collaboration with ILC and Philadelphia University, has designed three different cover layers for its new spacesuit prototype, Z-2. NASA will let the public decide which of the three designs will actually be built. Voting is open through April 15, 2014, at 11:59 p.m. EDT. Here are brief descriptions of the three designs: 'The "Biomimicry" design draws from an environment with many parallels to the harshness of space: the world's oceans. Mirroring the bioluminescent qualities of aquatic creatures found at incredible depths, and the scaly skin of fish and reptiles found across the globe, this design reflects the qualities that protect some of Earth's toughest creatures. ... "Technology" pays homage to spacesuit achievements of the past while incorporating subtle elements of the future. By using Luminex wire and light-emitting patches, this design puts a new spin on spacewalking standards such as ways to identify crew members. ... "Trends in Society" is based off of just that: being reflective of what every day clothes may look like in the not too distant future. This suit uses electroluminescent wire and a bright color scheme to mimic the appearance of sportswear and the emerging world of wearable technologies.'"

127 comments

  1. Options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They all look the same...

    1. Re: Options? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're all pretty fugly. The Buzz Lightyear looking one is the only one that doesn't make the wearer look stupid.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re: Options? by stoploss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're all pretty fugly. The Buzz Lightyear looking one is the only one that doesn't make the wearer look stupid.

      Ugh, I know. When comparing these options to the Z-1 suit at the top, I got this strange feeling like I had when comparing Windows 7 to Windows 8... "Seriously? Why can't we have the one that looks like something designed by a sane group rather than this abortion of an "upgrade"?"

      Unfortunately, the astronauts can't simply wear these inside-out to hide the horrible flair spewed all over the outside of the suit.

    3. Re: Options? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      What an excellent replication of the modern democratic process! What would you like to drink? Coke, Pepsi or New Coke?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re: Options? by kangsterizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know right, the most important thing in space is to look cool, not convenience.

    5. Re: Options? by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      At least New Coke was made with cane sugar.

    6. Re: Options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Buzz Lightyear looking one is the only one that doesn't make the wearer look stupid.

      The Buzz Lightyear looking one isn't part of the vote because it is just a design mockup that traded functionality for looks.
      The three options you can vote on are all the same physical design, the vote is for the colors/lights only.

    7. Re:Options? by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      It will be the one that the Colbert Nation votes for.

    8. Re: Options? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I agree the white&limegreen Z-1 looks better than all the others combined.

      More importantly, are there benefits to having bright or dark colors and can the luminescent lines be used for practical reasons?

      Assuming the visual design of these suits is irrelevant to it's usability (if not there should not be vote), why not let the astronauts decide for themselves?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    9. Re: Options? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's fitting, since spacewalking in LEO really is just falling with style :-P

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re: Options? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I know right

      From wrong?? Seriously; just because our speech might sound like abject, ignorant shit does not mean we can't do a little better when we're putting words down on paper (so-to-speak)...

      Then again, as Americans, I suppose we've got ourreputation to uphold. :p

    11. Re: Options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have some kool-aid, thank you...

    12. Re: Options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coke should just give up and quit. Even though it's the best option, they're splitting the vote with New Coke, which (although terrible) is still better than Pepsi.

    13. Re: Options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine scenarios where the pattern of luminescent lines could be designed in such a way to give at-a-glance 3-D orientation cues to observers in shadowed or otherwise suboptimal lighting environments. I don't think any of the luminescent patterns on these suits appear to be designed for that use case, though.

    14. Re: Options? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      What an "ourreputation"?

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    15. Re: Options? by davewoods · · Score: 2

      How has the internet been around this long, and you still do not know the phrase "I know right"?
      I think you just the entire thread.
      You not knowing that phrase hit me for maximum damage.
      Not knowing IKR has made your body explode into a fine bloody mist because you are only a level 2 druid.
      Um... Something about cats.
      THE END

    16. Re:Options? by endercase · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the only difference appears to be the lighting placement and color. So the title is a bit misleading, should be "NASA allows public to chose what sort of lights go on the suit". It looks to be a bid to make the public feel more involved and therefor invested. Honestly, I hope it works.

    17. Re: Options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dat missing space. It be killing you - you lil ignorant shit.

  2. Because by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good engineering is done by committee

    1. Re:Because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't engineering, it's marketing. The only department they have left.

    2. Re:Because by killkillkill · · Score: 1

      The engineering is done. We're just voting on the colors.

  3. Wow, timing. by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was working on a personal design project with very similar features, for undersea divers - an electroluminescent (EL) panel or wire system for divers to use to signal each other underwater, even at distances where hand signaling would be an issue. Different colors for different situations, and the ability to 'flash' a sort of morse code communique to one another.

    A diver's illumination would also light up or flash when air reserves reach low levels or the diver is otherwise in distress, so others could recognize the issue and come to aid.

    Feel free to steal the idea and run away with it, if anyone reading this is in the industry. Like I said, it was just a personal design project that I was planning on giving away to improve the general state of things.

    1. Re:Wow, timing. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      How about touch screen attached to the chest. Rotated out for user access and left down to signal others and report user state as well as making control adjustments. Seeing us the upper part of the suit is rigid, attachment of the hinged screen should not be problem even for quite a large screen, adjustable stylus points can be added index and middle fingers. Vacumn wont be a problem but temperature likely will be.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Wow, timing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light is attenuated rapidly in water. Modern LED lights can still be effective modes of communication for short distances, though. In terms of a dedicated device, there is are a few people looking at using dive computers for this kind of thing. A few dive computers can already be tuned to eavesdrop on multiple hoseless gas monitoring systems. In this way, a buddy pair can always know how much breathing gas they both have (Such as http://www.uemis.com/ or http://www.suunto.com/helo2/). There have been a few forays into the idea of using the same communication channel to communicate other messages, mostly in the dive instructor community.

    3. Re:Wow, timing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inspired by giant squid?

  4. Technology FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please PLEASE make a red version as well as a blue one. We need to be able to tell N7 and and Cerberus apart at a distance.

    I know you read Slashdot, NASA. Make this happen.

  5. 4th choice... by x0ra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    None of the above.

    1. Re:4th choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waiting for the Yoga Pants space suit before I vote. I want the wearer to feel like they're wearing nothing at all.

    2. Re:4th choice... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "None of the above."

      I agree. I did not care for any of the 2 designs. Further, I have to ask: what's the purpose of decorating them at all? Especially if they're all going to be the same?

      Since suits are customized for the wearer anyway, I say: let the wearer decide how to decorate the damned thing. Either that, or just put a big goddamned number on each one.

    3. Re:4th choice... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Meh. s/2/3

  6. Just a skin really... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    From what I can tell the basic design and materials seem to be the same between them (perhaps a slight difference in materials of Biomimicry) and what you are voting on is really more of a skinning of how the suit looks and where the glowing areas are placed...

    It does seem like there is some design aspect at work though in deciding how to use the light emitting portions, I really liked the thought of the Technology suit having different designs for different suit owners, and that has practical purpose also.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Just a skin really... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Good design isn't done by committees, either.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  7. Planet Side by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Funny

    So how many Station Cash is each suit anyway?

    1. Re:Planet Side by sg_oneill · · Score: 0

      We only accept Gold Pressed Latinum in this station buddy. BY order of the Grand Negus.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:Planet Side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being so oblivious to Planetside you can't see the correlation between the skins and the 3 factions.

      Vote VS or expect totalitarian dictatorship.

  8. I vote for by BradMajors · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NASA's 2012 Z-1 Spacesuit design.

    1. Re:I vote for by gargleblast · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Surely those new ones just need a new logo

    2. Re:I vote for by azadrozny · · Score: 2

      I agree. What is wrong with the white and green? The proposed color schemes seem like they would blend into some Lunar or Martian environments. Wouldn't you want these suits to be highly visible, day or night?

  9. Tron by drall.kj · · Score: 1

    Are these rejected uniform from the last Tron movie? All they need now is the pointless lights in the helmet to illumnate your face like BSG (both the 70s and the 00s).

    1. Re: Tron by Spottywot · · Score: 2

      a) Baddie uniform. b) goodie uniform. c) Star Trek uniform. If this is the attempt to envage the public in space missions, I hate to say it but it's probably pitched about right. Think X factor in space. I shudder to think about it.

      --
      In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
  10. Don't worry, no functional parts included by gman003 · · Score: 5, Informative

    None of what's being voted on can be considered a functional part. All that we're voting on is the cover, basically some soft armor to protect the actual suit from damage. And then all that we're voting on is the coloration patterns.

    Oh, and this is purely for the prototype - it will never even go into space. So all that the voting public is being trusted with is picking out the colors of a protective cover for a model that's only being used for testing, not actual spaceflight.

    And since pretty much 0% of the voting public are experienced aerospace engineers, that's probably all we *should* be trusted with. I know the 150 hours I've put into Kerbal Space Program certainly does not qualify *me* for designing anything that actually goes into space and needs to work properly.

    1. Re:Don't worry, no functional parts included by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know the 150 hours I've put into Kerbal Space Program certainly does not qualify *me* for designing anything that actually goes into space and needs to work properly.

      Don't be so hard on yourself because the rockets don't work well. That can be easily solved by launching 50 rockets instead of one.

    2. Re:Don't worry, no functional parts included by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Moar Boosters!

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    3. Re:Don't worry, no functional parts included by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Wait... You mean all the time I spent playing Simple Rockets on my Android smartphone doesn't qualify me to build rockets?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:Don't worry, no functional parts included by bughunter · · Score: 1

      The "cover" or "skin" of the suit is also functional. As a systems engineer (for space-based sensors and cameras) I can think of a few requirements that need to be addressed right off the bat:

      - Visible Contrast, so that the wearer can be detected/identified by humans, from a distance
      - EM Reflectivity, so that the wearer can be detected/identified by active scan sensors (lidar/radar/whatever)
      - Customization options, so that wearers can be distinguished from one another
      - Glare reduction, so that the wearer's visibility isn't compromised under direct sunlight
      - Thermal conductivity and albedo requirements, matched to the performance of the suit's internal thermal regulation
      - Micrometeorite protection (probably addressed by deeper layers, but also a factor here)

      And that's just from 2 minutes of brainstorming...

      Of course, since this suit will never actually be used in space, the systems engineering process above can be abandoned in favor of public relations, which NASA spends a small but significant chunk of its budget on...

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    5. Re:Don't worry, no functional parts included by gman003 · · Score: 1

      However, all of those have already been determined. All of the presented options are functionally equivalent in all of those regards (note how each of them have illumination, for instance). While you are definitely correct that the cover can be considered a functional part, there are no functional decisions between the options we have been provided.

  11. Seems a bit of a setup. by Artifex · · Score: 2

    They only have one option that mentions immediately practical applications in its supporting information. That's the Technology skin, with the applications being easier crew identification, etc. Precisely the only reason why you would think they would invest the resources to play with pretty lights on the surface of a prototype, right now. The others are designs that might be nice to have someday, if there are large populations in these environments that might want to express individuality and creativity.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:Seems a bit of a setup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Easier crew identification? Just put all the non essential personnel in a red shirt.

  12. Changing my mind by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    I really thought NASA was the future, I've fought tooth and nail with naysayers over about NASA, It was incredibly depressing the space shuttle started and ended in my lifetime and we rely on the Russians to launch new astronauts to the station.

    But this? This is the first time I've started to question my fanboy support of NASA.

    Seriously? These designs are worthy of a poll or even posting?

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:Changing my mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The changes that caused NASA to wind up in this position have been at least 20 years in the making, probably more. NASA now has a culture of almost fetishistic worship of past achievements, and too much emphasis on playing it safe. If you want innovation now you have to run as far away from NASA as you can. NASA's only hope for actually achieving something anymore is support of private enterprise, and I think that they themselves realize this.

    2. Re:Changing my mind by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The other depressing thing about Nasa is how they've gone from launching people to the moon in the 1960's to telling people that driving their cars is going to kill the planet (Hansen was head of Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies from 1981 to 2013). No wonder they're not keen on launching actual rockets - those things must emit loads of CO2. I'm surprised Hansen would go on exhaling CO2.

      It's like something out of a dystopian science fiction novel about how a once proud, space faring society descends into ignorance and obscurantism.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Changing my mind by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      We'd be better off if it was CO2.

      Instead, the Space Shuttle Main Engines (3) burn hydrogen and liquid oxygen, emitting water vapor as it's exhaust. That's not bad.

      The Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters burn ammonium perchlorate, aluminum, and iron oxide (thermite) suspended in epoxy. This results in hydrogen chloride (among other things).

      Hydrogen Chloride + water = Hydrochloric Acid.

      All the "launch guests" were given a general safety statement in their packets of information, which includes a statement about acid rain:

      ACID RAIN STATEMENT
      - At ignition, the Space Shuttle's twin solid rocket boosters produce an exhaust cloud containing drops of hydrochloric acid. This cloud drifts with the wind after the launch, slowly dissipating as it travels. These droplets are not strong enough to cause anything other than a minor irritation and are easily rinsed off with water.
      - Launch viewing sites are far enough away from the launch site that there is ample time for visitors to return to the bus. It is imperative that you listen for all announcements and strictly follow all instructions provided by NASA.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:Changing my mind by Scorch_Mechanic · · Score: 1

      Why aren't they worth a poll? Awareness and support of NASA in the U.S. is low. Anything that NASA can do to raise awareness about themselves to the public is a Good Thing. You remember Mohawk Guy? His stupid hairdo brought a brief surge of positive public relations to NASA by way of meme. If NASA can get this (yes, silly) poll into the internet and circulating for a few weeks, they'll have gained positive PR.

      Besides, this actually makes the public feel like they're involved with NASA. Directly. Even if they're not affecting anything truly material, it's a definite step up from being several dozen steps removed from influencing NASA. If NASA can increase support for themselves in the public, maybe that public will be a little more inclined to vote for candidates who support space missions.

      It's all a game of perceptions. I hope NASA succeeds.

      --
      You should turn signatures off.
    5. Re:Changing my mind by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain. Still, Scorch_Mechanic in another post has it right. A little something to catch the eye of the public.

      It gives teachers a chance to engage their kids. If we have any engaged teachers, that is; it could be that the last time they were engaged, they were sitting in auditoriums across America, watching the devil's-horns of the SRB's wandering from the cloud of gas that was Challenger.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    6. Re:Changing my mind by davewoods · · Score: 1

      This was the best comment I have read this year. Very informative. A++++ Would read again.

  13. Null for Taxpayers? by drfred79 · · Score: 1

    I vote no.

    1. Re:Null for Taxpayers? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I vote yes.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  14. What does Putin Have to Say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, if not for Russua how you gonna get up there anymore?

  15. Forget public opinion ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... we need experts to judge these designs.

    What does Mr. Blackwell have to say?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  16. Option B is the both functional and representative by WiPEOUT · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Someone mentioned above that the vote has no functional meaning. I disagree.

    The glowing patterns, properly designed, can help astronauts see the relative orientation of other astronauts, particularly in low light situations. The more distinctive yet simple the pattern in terms of placement relative to the body of the wearer, the better. The first option (A) obscures this by not clearly aligning all the luminescent lines with the shape of the human body. For me, this makes "biomimicry" functionally less suitable. The third option (C) has lines on all limbs without much to distinguish between them, meaning that when observing from other orientations, there could be confusion for the observer. Granted, the illumination on the backpack mitigates this at some angles, but the second option (B) has distinctive front and back and clearly shows an observer the orientation of the wearer. Option B looks arguably most functional.

    As an added bonus, the luminescent pattern in option B can also serve to symbolise the origin of the astronauts, in the highly unlikely even they come in contact with another intelligence :) The second option's (B) "technology" pattern on the front approximates the bipedal shape of a human, while the others do not.

  17. NASA's attempt at Case Modding by Narrowband · · Score: 1

    Kind of sad that NASA's suit R&D rollout to the public seems to be focused on case modding the exterior.

    That said, they clearly need a "retro" cover. First look at the NASA design reminded me of a book I read as a kid, "Tom Swift and his Jetmarine," where he built escape suits for his submarine in the shape of giant eggs, like Humpty-Dumpty.

    1. Re:NASA's attempt at Case Modding by ttucker · · Score: 3, Informative

      The FAQ says that this is only the design for the cover that will be used during on earth prototyping, and that the actual flight version of the suit will not be styled at all.

    2. Re:NASA's attempt at Case Modding by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      How about we skip the taxpayer-funded fashion show and not style any of them at all?

      I don't recall a fashion contest before the Gemini and Apollo flights...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:NASA's attempt at Case Modding by miller701 · · Score: 1

      No, but they were made by Maidenform, a women's undergarment manufacturer.

  18. Re:Option B is the both functional and representat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The second option's (B) "technology" pattern on the front approximates the bipedal shape of a human, while the others do not.

    Well, so does the shape of the space suit...

  19. I vote for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the Dragon Army. We already have the uniforms.

  20. Back to the drawing board by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 2

    Since it will probably be quit a while before the next suit redesign, I have one suggestion.

    If you just have to have wires that light up, then having them individually change colors to reflect biological conditions would be a wiser use than just for the glow in the dark function. This way your suit could visually convey critical medical information to the rest of the crew. For instance you could monitor heart rate, respiration and pucker factor on a space walk or during the realization that you are wearing a shower curtain when tiny high velocity particles pierce your suit.

  21. Yuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of the designs are very aesthetic. Nor is the bio-luminescence very functional other than showing others where you are. I'd have to say the old orange suits look much better. Whatever happened to the designs that they had going that more resembled normal clothing. I mean if you're going to make a space suit that makes someone bigger, add more mech type stuff to it. If you're gonna be bulky...make use of it.

  22. Pimp my Spacesuit... by David_Hart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know that the whole Pimp-my-X meme has jumped the shark when NASA scientists think that they need Tron style space suits and that they actually think they look modern and cool...

    1. Re:Pimp my Spacesuit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Krogan find them very modern and cool.

    2. Re:Pimp my Spacesuit... by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      You know that the whole Pimp-my-X meme has jumped the shark when NASA scientists think that they need Tron style space suits and that they actually think they look modern and cool...

      Proving once again that NASA hasn't quite gotten out of the '80s yet.

  23. Missing option by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    I run with Cowboy Neal naked on Mars.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  24. Reminds me of someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gru from Despicable Me :)

  25. Really? by berchca · · Score: 1

    Multiple choice questions always miss the most important option: none of the above

  26. None of us is as dumb as all of us by AntiBasic · · Score: 1

    None of us is as dumb as all of us

  27. The batteries last too long! by tlambert · · Score: 1

    The batteries last too long!

    Quick! Add more electroluminescent wire! Hurry Robin, the the Maker Faire!

  28. Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They all look like something i would shoot at without thinking if i was playing an fps ;)

  29. society = violence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It struck me as wry humor that the "trends of society" (c) mannikin carries a gun...

    Paai

    1. Re:society = violence? by CayceeDee · · Score: 1

      It struck me as wry humor that the "trends of society" (c) mannikin carries a gun...

      Please, please stay away from me in a firefight. You can't tell the difference between a power driver and a gun.

    2. Re:society = violence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the power driver was the artists intention. But there are no structures with screws in sight and the stance of the figure is that of one wielding a gun.

      Paai

  30. Which polish do you want on your turd? by Mr+Z · · Score: 2

    I see three options: Blue waterbear with spaghetti, Grey Tron waterbear, and Frumpy waterbear

    1. Re:Which polish do you want on your turd? by davewoods · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I kinda think they look like the ancient race of aliens from the movie Fifth Element... But I DO like the word frumpy.

  31. Please patent it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please patent it or else some assholes would patent your idea and then charge everyone lots of arms and legs to use their products.

    If you intent to give it away, owning that patent ensure that no one else can patent that idea of yours.

    1. Re:Please patent it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you intent to give it away, owning that patent ensure that no one else can patent that idea of yours.

      Nope. You can patent it to hell, it still won't prevent anyone from writing a similar patent with a trivial change to use for trolling and the patent office will accept it.
      For contesting the troll in court you only need to show prior art and that has he already done.

  32. They're all stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore the lighting. It's all stupid, and it's being done to make them look sexy, at a ludicrious but very profitiable price tag.

    Pay attention to the joints, which strongly affect movement, the gloves, the materials. The "most advanced use of impact resistant composites" in the first suit means, to me, "no one has tested this in vacuum *and* head *and* radiation and it will probably shred due to unexpected outgassing of the plastics, ignite with the O2 that starts leaking from the shredded suit, and seal the new hole with frozen blood from our now anemic astronaut. But that saves fuel for the return flight, especially if they aim the leaks in the correct direction to slow their orbit!". The cruft sticking out of the back plate is also begging for trouble.

    The pleated armor is interesting, but unlikely to work well without a lot of hard use to get the kinks out. And finely detailed 3d fitting is unlikely to remain fitted for long missions: astronauts tend to lose weight in orbit, food is expensive, and they're working their *asses* off. So extremely careful fittings are pointless, their body shapes change noticeably while they're up on long missions.

    I'd want to see the linings. Do they crease in ways likely to chafe skin? Do they provide the needed flexibility for an astronaut to reach into a mechanism on EVA and still be able to make a tool work correctly, especially the elbow and hand flexibility? How is the range of motion? Does the lining retain body fluids from EVA and need rinsing or airing out after a lengthy EVA, or does it accumulate the rich funk of the locker room in hard to clean crevices and have to be sanitized by opening it and leaving it outside?

    Frankly, I really miss the idea of the "skin suit", basically a wet suit for outer space with a rigid helmet connected to a snug, low or no pressure body suit. Helmet air leaks into the suit, the suit leaks air a *bit* for cooling and CO2 exhaust, but it relies on the astronaut's own skin inside the suit to keep things together at low pressure. Much, *much* more flexible than the semi-armored systems we currently use, and perfectly reasonable for earth orbit missions.

    1. Re:They're all stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of a 'skin suit' as you describe it is a non-starter in space. The astronauts need their atmosphere (inside the suit) at a significant fraction of earth-standard (specifically the partial pressure of the oxygen), or the oxygen-exchange mechanisms of the human body don't actually *work*.

      A non-rigid 'skin suit' turns into a balloon under that pressure, and it becomes incredibly difficult to impossible for the astronaut inside to bend and maneuver.

    2. Re:They're all stupid by jo_ham · · Score: 0

      I see you didn't read the FAQ in the linked article.

      Oh, and you forgot to log in, kid.

      Classic slashdot; proclaim your superior 'common sense' knowledge over a professional science and engineering team while posting anonymously.

      I'm sure they'll pay serious, and I do mean *serious*, attention to your expert comments.

    3. Re:They're all stupid by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Hear hear!

      I suppose we could save NASA some bucks, though. Get rid of the engineering teams and find the AC that thinks of things that (obviously) none of the NASA folks were able to. In a throwaway Slashdot post, no less.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  33. Initial Reaction-Why should I care? by BoFo · · Score: 1

    I'll vote for the crotchless number in muted mauve. I like the suit, but could not care less about its decorative appearance. How about an orbital craft that takes off from and lands on a runway? I have my priorities, after all.

  34. Is it going to be used in space? by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

    Is the design that is selected going to fly to space?

    No

    *sigh*

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  35. why should we care? by Mishotaki · · Score: 1
    as per the article:

    Is the design that is selected going to fly to space? No, as the Z-series is still in the prototype or non-flight phase.

    why the **** should we care then?

  36. There is a functional difference by asylumx · · Score: 1

    These suits all have lighting apparently, and that lighting matters. Of the three options, the one that gives the most visibility to the wearer is the third, because the lighting extends down the legs.

    Other than that, I don't think it matters which of these is built.

  37. Think brassieres! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI I enjoyed this documentary about how the Apollo space suits were created.

    Moon Machines (2008): The Space Suit - YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY_4vSmPMy0

  38. Gundam? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    I vote for a Gundam mobile suit version :-D

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    1. Re:Gundam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely something to mount mini-boosters and laser cannons. Sweet.

  39. Re:Option B is the both functional and representat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hadn't thought of this at all, but you are totally right!

    I'd hate if during some daring space rescue operation, I had to jump across the gulf of space to intersect with another stranded astronaut, only to realize too late that I misjudged their orientation, and we ended up face-first in each others crotches, like some sort of cosmic 69. You never see that in movies because movies are never realistic and some amount of suspension of disbelief is always necessary, but for sure it would happen in real life unless all astronauts had an luminescent "up" arrow painted on their suit.

    PS: I'm not trying to poke fun at your observation; I really do think it was insightful and would have modded you up if I had points
    PPS: Like somebody else above said, those suits are really fugly, though.

  40. Re:Option B is the both functional and representat by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    In case we ever come in contact with another intelligence, I prefer the luminescent pattern to be in the shape of an astronaut smiling while killing an alien.

    I agree the pattern can be functional, I disagree any of the designs (including B) come even close to being functional.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  41. major flaw in design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two major flaws with this. More pink and it needs some COWBELLS attached to the helmet!

  42. *facepalm* Has it come to this? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Has it really come to this? NASA doesn't have cool technology and science to show us? It's down to fashion?

    Could we just focus on the core mission of putting humans in space without needing to rent capacity from the Russians?

    Or have we sunk so low that the only way to engage people in space flight is by letting the masses choose the outfits?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:*facepalm* Has it come to this? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Has it really come to this? NASA doesn't have cool technology and science to show us? It's down to fashion?

      Could we just focus on the core mission of putting humans in space without needing to rent capacity from the Russians?

      Or have we sunk so low that the only way to engage people in space flight is by letting the masses choose the outfits?

      Because the team that works on the non-flight-capable prototype suit cover design is the same one that works on the rockets, right?

      The main reason we're not putting humans in space is that funding for that is so slim. The US military's annual air conditioning costs in Afghanistan exceed NASA's entire budget. Without large public support for space exploration it simply won't be funded. This sort of outreach is part of the way of doing that. Get the public interested and the funding may follow at some point in the future.

      All of the cool "technology and science" is under the cover design - this is the second version of the new EVA suit. Of course, showing this to Joe Normal isn't going to engage him as much as allowing him to vote on three different "cool space" designs for the outside of the suit. All the "technology and science" is there as it was before, with various ways to access them.

      Just because they are also engaging in public outreach like this doesn't mean they're not also working on the "hard" stuff.

    2. Re:*facepalm* Has it come to this? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Just because they are also engaging in public outreach like this doesn't mean they're not also working on the "hard" stuff.

      Fine then. The Biomimicry one looks cool, with the Buzz Lightyear one being my second choice.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:*facepalm* Has it come to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a look at the public-facing website. The whole thing has gone from dull-but-practical to Flash-driven wannabe kid-site.

      These days, if you want to find something specific, like a recent image from a mission, do not ever go through the mission page. Always start with your favourite space.sci.blog and find the direct link on their post about the image.

    4. Re:*facepalm* Has it come to this? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      good answer

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  43. Re:Option B is the both functional and representat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "These requirements drive selection of specific high-performance materials and design details that would preclude us from using many of the features you see in these options for the Z-2 suit."

  44. Do we want to aspire to Dr. Who? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    They all look like Sontarans. So the next generation of space explorers need no necks?

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  45. Poor Design IMHO by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    To me, this suit seems extremely bulky, with poor visibility. The accent lighting, as presented seems rather useless and a waste of precious energy reserves. And I know it doesn't, but it sure looks like it is forcing the astronaught's head to be contorted forward.

    Is it sad that I could create a far better suit design in one day? (Engineering aside)

    So if I was to design a suit, I would first look at the human body, visibility and safety.

    - structure the suit for a relaxed body position, especially for space walks and low gravity (think more like the Craftmatic Contour bed)

    - increase the dome size, come on we should be able to give our astronaughts good periphereal vision (why not a larger and closer to whole hemisphere dome)

    - add display screens in front of the astronaught's portal, these would be hooked up to cameras that give a full 360 degree coverage and a location map of all parties (other astronaughts, shuttles, station, satellites, etc)

    - illumination, sure, have a light source, thats a given. But if we're going to do LED wires and such they should involve the following. 1) Display a color for identification purposes (perhaps around helmet) 2) display state and well being of the astronaught. (in this case a pattern that is color coded, and can display from green to red the current oxygen reserves, energy reserves, pressure levels, and basic 'naught vitals)

    - functionality...hands are great, but there are times you need a third hand. The suit seems to have nothing for assisting tasks. I'd add a Kangaroo pouch on the belly. This would allow the astronaught to essentially have a pouch that can be expanded to contain things. I'd equip each forearm with a grasping clasp. Say I need a wrench, I can just set it on my forearm and it will clamp down and hold it. I see very little design in this suit to assist with functionality.

    - feet, these should be adaptable. If I am in space free floating, something with magnetic or even suck type system makes more sense. Versus a suit to explore say an asteroid or Mars, in which a different foot pattern would be beneficial. So I'd make a sort of replaceable sole - like horseshoes.

    - tethering? I see nothing to facilitate tethering amongst astronaughts

    - utility/mission hardpoints, I'd want a suit that easily allowed dockable modules. Extended oxygen supplies, etc. Not sure the design pictured would be easily modified to support such.

    - plasma cannons, clearly the suit should be equipped with plasma cannons or an extended range particle projection cannon.

    1. Re:Poor Design IMHO by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      ...and frikkin' lasers on the helmet. Who doesn't put lasers on the helmet?

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Poor Design IMHO by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Laser AMS System ..... hoorah!

  46. EL and SCUBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EL isn't nearly bright enough in any situation but clear water at night. I've been unable to see bright dive lights during the daytime and in really mucky water.

    1. Re:EL and SCUBA by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it involved sound too. In fact, I came up with the idea the other day during a discussion with someone about the current missing plane crises - he asked why airplane black boxes (that end up in the ocean) can't transmit an underwater ping that could be heard for miles by listening stations. That would never be practical, of course, but it got me thinking about underwater signaling in general. I live in South Florida and am surrounded by boat and diver culture.

  47. None of the above by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

    I'd rather see this:

    http://news.nationalgeographic...

    --
    THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    1. Re:None of the above by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Yes, very nice. Using tight clothing to maintain pressure and hold the gooey bits together. I wonder how it does against micro-meteorites.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:None of the above by davewoods · · Score: 1

      Probably exactly as well as the current iteration.

  48. My vote.. by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

    .. is a spacesuit that doesn't drown the occupant in his/her condensation. Because drowning is not very stylish, or so I'm told.

    1. Re:My vote.. by davewoods · · Score: 1

      That is a feature, not a bug. Water for everyone!

    2. Re:My vote.. by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      That is a feature, not a bug. Water for everyone!

      After all, our bodies are mostly water, so all these whiners should just shut the hell up. (Because if they don't they may drown..)

  49. Rather retro by TimOBrien8837 · · Score: 1

    I'd rather they went retro and just use the suits from "2001" back in '68.

  50. Hu? by stackOVFL · · Score: 1

    Uuumm why? Our space program seems to lack any usable goals. Why don't we put this cash into a new shuttle design or something else that we can use to get into space again instead? Having to hitch a ride from the Russian's should be motivation (and embarrassment) enough to put a hold on the new space threads. Or maybe better put, Hey NASA it's 2014 where's my freak'n space car I want off this rock!

  51. As an American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am disappointed at the lack of a Red, White and Blue option with an Eagle emblazoned across the chest and corporate logos plastered all over the arms and legs. At least add and STP motor oil patch and R-Type sticker somewhere.

  52. Bikesheds in Spaaaaace by mrex · · Score: 1

    Seriously, they're all functionally the same suit, just with three different-but-equally-hokey electro-luminescent designs. I appreciate what NASA is trying to do here in terms of involving the public. Their intentions are laudable. This is as close to literal "bikeshedding" as it gets, though, and so it feels more than a little patronizing. Evidently what NASA thinks that the public cares about is style and no substance. Maybe that's not as untrue as I wish it were, but I can't see something like this as an effective way to pique the interest of "those" people.

    So, I guess what I'm trying to say is that I think, for the good of the space program, we need to make Justin Bieber an astronaut.

    1. Re:Bikesheds in Spaaaaace by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      "Beibs in Space!". I like that. It has a nice ring to it.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  53. Oh no, space suites by fashion designers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone's been watching too many crappy Sci-Fi movies, less modern art and more function. The Z-1 color scheme seems like a better option than any of those up for vote, maybe with the addition of some bands of green around the wrists so you can see arm movements from a distance/in the dark.

    http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/jsc2012e237800_alt_2.jpg

  54. Cashmere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just saying...

  55. Thermodynamics, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Existing suits are shiny white for a reason. What do you thinking the cooling burden on a black suit is in unfiltered direct sunlight?
    Even the gray and white suit will be worse. Has NASA kept any engineers around to explain this to the kids who think black is cool?

  56. "the space suit the public wanted" by AndyBaker · · Score: 1

    Why do they all have to make you look like stumpy legged, hunch backed aliens?

    They're all as bad as each other. It's a superficial skin so they can promote it as "the space suit the public wanted".

    Pass.

  57. Big Daddies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing I can see when I look at any of them is Big Daddy. They should make a design based on that.