Last Month's "Planet X" Announcement Was Probably Wrong
KentuckyFC (1144503) writes "Last month, astronomers announced the discovery of the most distant body in the Solar System, a dwarf planet called 2012VP113. They also said this body's orbit was strangely aligned with several other dwarf planets in the Kuiper Belt and that this could be the result of these bodies being herded by a much larger Planet X even further from the Sun. They calculated that this hidden planet could be between 2 and 15 times the mass of the Earth and orbiting at a distance of between 200 AU and 300 AU, an announcement that triggered excited headlines around the world. Now it looks as though these predictions were wildly optimistic. It turns out that the position of Planet X can be constrained more tightly using orbital measurements of other planets. And when this data is added into the mix, Planet X can only only orbit at much greater distances, if it exists at all. The new calculations suggest that a planet twice the mass of Earth cannot orbit any closer than about 500 AU. And a planet 15 times the mass of Earth must be at least 1000 AU distant. What's more, the New Horizons mission currently on its way to Pluto, should constrain the distance to beyond 4700 AU. So any Planet X hunters out there are likely to be disappointed."
Hopefully they will name it something beginning with "P" so mnemonics like "My Very Easy Method, Just Set Up Nine Planets" and so on all work again, or has anyone come up with a good one for the current 8 planet setup?
UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
Soon on all paranormal/extraterrestrial channels: "NASA confirms the existence of Planet X : New Horizons probe discovers a giant Earth-like planet 4700 AU away from the Sun"
Soon on all paranormal/extraterrestrial channels: "NASA/NWO shills on the Slashdot comment section spreading disinformation"
Duh, they were announcing planet X. Those anouncements have always turned out to be wrong! That was fun. We'll do this again in a couple of years.
Just go "My Very Easy Method, Just Set Up Nine ... oh."
Only the mad conspiracy hatters will be disappointed, because they already know that planet X is on a collision course with us. But then, they don't care about new findings,unless they support their theory. Amateur astronomers however will be just as excited when a planet is found much further away.
It's actually a very exciting and interesting article... it means that in the near future, we won't be searching for a needle in a haystack. We know pretty much where to find the needle, if there is any. To me, that is even more reason to search, which hopefully opens up some funding for the scientists who produce these awesome results.
For me personally, the really exciting thing is that there is so much out there. Perhaps no earth-sized planet, many more dwarf planet than I had ever dreamed...
When they find it (and they will), it should be named Nibiru, since that's what it'll be called anyway.
we call it our 'weather'? http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=tornado+swarms
The Man From Planet X told me all I needed to know about a rogue planet floating around the solar system.
I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
Did they ever figure out why the orbit of Neptune is "wrong"? They were looking for, again, Planet X, and discovered Pluto, but it wasn't large enough to affect Neptune's orbit. (or is it 'effect'?)
Just as weak as the proof that there is a new planet. The reason we haven't found many Kuiper/Oort objects is because they are dark. WISE can't see anything that dark. We're likely only ever going to see these trans-Neptunian objects if we manage to observe it passing in front of a star.
So does this now mean that Voyager 1 has, or hasn't, left the solar system?
Cos that's how I usually gauge astronomical retractions.
What is Planet X supposed to be nowadays? It was supposed to be a planet beyond Pluto. But first off, Pluto isn't a planet anymore. And there have been a number of KBO's discovered that that are comparable to Pluto. Does Planet X have to meet the actual definition of a planet?
So what's Planet X if it hasn't already been found and named Eris? Or Makemake? Or Sedna? Or should it actually be called Planet IX, since Pluto isn't a real planet anymore?
This whole Planet X thing sounds absurd. Between this, and the thinly-veiled slashvertisement for NoSQL "Ask Slashdot", and all the other crap articles that've made the front page, is it still April 1st somewhere or something?
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
I don't think my Tengu can make a 4700 AU warp in one hop :-(
Lookup "NIBURU" - perhaps that will shed some light on it for you, IF You haven't heard that name/term before, in regards to "Planet 'X'"...
(Personally, I think it's a hoax of somekind by this point... why? See below!)
APK
P.S.=> I was following that madness & lunacy for a bit there last year (better prepared than not type thinking, not conspiracy theorist :"they're hiding the truth from us" type stuff).
However - It NEVER "panned out" as was told about it!
(I.E.-> Niburu/Planet X allegedly being some "rogue planet" that has supposedly destroyed our civilization(s) in the past via gravometric stress caused by its numerous near passing to earth in generations past)... apk
See...with mathematics and Statistics, you can prove Anything to be true OR false.
If Planet X existed, we'd have seen it by now./ Sofia Koutsouveli